Now, once again, the now, once again the Democrats impeachment backfired on Capitol Hill. We have shown you earlier tonight the Democrats, violent reckless rhetoric over the last four years, violates the own standards. They themselves would be guilty of inciting insurrection and, furthermore, the only way the Democrats can make their case against Donald Trump is to deceptively, as they have been editing his remarks and lying about what he said on January. Six. This impeachment trial is devoid of facts, devoid of any compelling evidence, devoid of any constitutional basis here, to react to all of Us South Carolina Senator Lindsey, Graham, and if you compare the words that we played of Stacey Abrams and Hillary Clinton, and you intersperse comment of the managers with the insurrectionist language of the left, guess what it suits perfectly. It fits perfectly doesnt. It yeah. I hope the defense team is

watching your show, but let me your viewers, the not guilty vote, is growing. After today, most Republicans found the presentation by the House managers offensive and absurd. We all know what happened at the capitol was terrible. I hope everybody involved that broke in the capitol goes to jail, but I dont remember any of the house managers saying a damn thing when they were trying to break in my house and going after Susan Collins and spitting on all of us. If this is a problem for a politician to give the speech that President Trump did well, then Kamala Harris has a real problem because she actively engaged in bailing out rioters. Here is what I suggest. If you are a politician trying to raise bail for people accused of rioting, you are inciting more riots, something that nobody talked about. That is important. If there is preplanning there is no incitement. Do you agree with that? Yes, sir

youre asking that here is what the managers did im asking you. People said I didnt pay attention today they are wrong. They are wrong. The managers have got this cockamanie idea that they were monitoring the proud boys and the far right websites, and they knew it was going to happen and they encouraged it that looney tunes. They are saying that because if the president didnt Know- and it was preplanned- he is not guilty, so they are trying to create a story line that he was in on it before it happened that he was monitoring the proud boys and the crazy websites, and he knew they were come to Washington with the violence on their mind and he encouraged it. This is not evidence. This is a democratic, liberal,

novel presented as evidence im watching all of this and im applying the language and the standards that the Democrats are using. In this case now they are saying that the president is challenging election results. Hillary Clinton still never accepted to this day that she lost to Donald Trump same with Stacey Abrams in Georgia. The reason I think you tell me if im wrong, they have to go backwards. To lay the foundation is because the exact words of the president did not incite violence. Nor did anybody ever know now that we know people were plotting scheming. Steeper you go. Can I say something quick you bet new evidence makes you do that. The only reason they are trying to create a bizarre story line that Trump was in on it with Dan Scavino, because we now know after impeachment done without a lawyer or hearing or without witnesses,

that the F dot Bi and the Capitol Hill police actually now understand. This was preplanned. They were planning bombs the night before so the whole story line that Donald Trump caused this by the speech has fallen apart, good to the good law enforcement activity. What did Nancy Pelosi know and when did she know it if it was widely known by the F dot Bi and the Capitol Hill police people were planning to come to Washington before the 6th to create violence? Did he is know about that? The whole story line was that Trump created this from the speech. Now we know they had it on their mind. He spoke and they are playing a game of trying to get trump in on it before January six. This is why you dont want snatch. Impeachments evidence does matter evidence matters big time, because its now coming in all right now walk us through the rest of the process. Here

you get sixteen hours to prosecute the case. The president lawyers dont need sixteen hours. Do it in three or four max walk us through what happened? Okay, so here is what I would do take all of your videos. Literally, you have got the democratic politicians being silent or encouraging acts of violence. You have a sitting vice president, as a: u DOT S senator telling people they are not going to stop, they shouldnt stop and trying to bail them out. If I were the Trump team, I expose the hypocrisy here and go after the argument. It was preplan and the idea that the president was in on it is absurd. This is collapsing before their eyes, not guilty vote growing, so it will be over by Sunday. I hope for the good of the country, the constitutional argument. It was preplanned, meaning he couldnt have incited it and the insurrectionist.