On Wednesday's Mark Levin Show, a majority of Americans believe that Russia's aggression in Ukraine has a national security implication for the U.S. This slaughter plus Putin’s repeated nuclear threats are even more of a reason to topple Putin. Putin's history of assassinating dissenters and his past with Alexi Navalny seem to be forgotten on the pro-Putin wing of the Democrat and Republican Parties since they're busy attacking NATO. Then, Supreme Court nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson claims that she can't define what a woman is during her senate confirmation hearing. Jackson was pressed on her passivity in sentencing sex offenders (who went on to re-offend) and critical race theory. Later, James O'Keefe joins the show to explain how the federal government spied on Project Veritas by obtaining their emails from Microsoft corporation and then placed a gag order on Microsoft to silence them and keep it secret. It's now been revealed that Uber was also forced to hand over Project Veritas' ride history and it’s unknown how many vendors it approached to violate O'Keefe's first amendment rights. Afterward, Rep Ted Budd joins the show with an update on his campaign for the U.S. Senate in North Carolina.
Mark Levin Audio Rewind - 3/23/22
2022-03-23This is an unofficial transcript meant for reference. Accuracy is not guaranteed.
Ladies and gentlemen, the following segment of the pod cast is presented exclusively by hills: they'll, college fervour, one hundred and seventy five years for purposes have defined hills, Dales Mission, learning, character, faith and freedom
Thank you for listening and my sincere appreciation to our brothers and sisters at Hillsdale for their great sponsorship, the no broadcasting from the underground command post, the bowels of a hidden bunker somewhere under the Brooklyn Steel over nondescript building. We have once again made contact with our leader, the
The
Hello, America Mark Levin our number, eighty, seven thousand, seven hundred and thirty, eight one thousand three hundred and eighty one, one thousand eight hundred and seventy seven three thousand eight hundred and thirteen eighty one. When I asked about a month ago, when Russia started this war and invaded Ukraine, Ukraine allowed to win, or even the stalemate, the situation and apparently not you yes, but apparently not it's one of the reasons they can
Mig twenty nine said they want. There's a recent poll out, then he hot off the presses by Fox by sixty three
sent the thirty two percent Americans want the United States to do more. So this.
this argument that it's the
Washington war, machine or Washington, defense contractor.
Or the neocons is a lie is a lie unless you think sixty three percent of the american people fall in that category. Clearly they don't despite
the best efforts of the Putin Wing of the democratic republican parties and the media.
by seventy six to nineteen percent. The american people approve of President Zelensky Skis actions in Ukraine. I'd say: that's pretty overwhelming.
And whether or not this has a national security interest in the United States, eighty five to fourteen percent, eighty five percent say yes,
at sixty three percent of the american people. Seventy six percent of the american
Ultimately, eighty five percent of the american people agree on something is a big deal, I'm going to get to this.
cream court dont, where I was all over it yesterday, aiming to be all over it today. But I want to finish this.
We now hear the media regurgitating the russian propaganda, which is, if you doesn't.
make more headway in Russia. You know it's not enough to be slaughtering the people in Morocco and I'll capturing aid workers
fifteen of them have been kidnapped or sending
Twenty four hundred ukrainian children into russia- and God knows what else.
If fears the argument goes, he
I resort to nukes
that more of a reason to support efforts to take him out. I don't
in this. I really doubt this will be the first war in human history
greatest war, criminal war criminals in this particular war for sure whose threatening nuclear weapons against people, perhaps nato- perhaps even Us- is immune-
From the war, in the sense that that individuals not be targeted even by surrogates, even by surrogates of Ukraine, while he targets the play,
of Ukraine and has failed on several occasions with the vagueness, grew and the Chechnya is.
even while he's known to be an assassin not just to characterise ass in a real assess scores of reporters political opponents.
People who fall out of favour, they just wind up dead wherever they are in the world. One guy did in the hotel room in Washington DC in London in Germany and so forth.
and so when I hear this, I say more the reason to support at least quietly efforts to take up, even if he's threatening nuclear war,
bends? If he's a war criminal which clearly, he is if he slaughtering thousands of innocent people.
and if you believe, as I do- and the vast majority of american people do that this battle in Ukraine,
clearly relates to the United States and our national security? China's watching IRAN's watching North Korea's watching
the eastern european countries are well aware of what re Russia is capable of. Well, then it makes sense. Doesn't it makes a lotta sense? I guess I'm going to have to find this, I'm trying to find it, but I cannot.
I do notice that the Putin's wing of the media has been relatively quiet about a gentleman by the name of Alexey nevah me. Are you hurt me talk about this man yesterday, Alexey Nevada,
Like scene of army is the leader of the opposition most effective later, he also has run a group questioning the corruption that exists in.
In Russia and yesterday was given a nine and a half year sentence on top of two years that he's already served, and there now afraid
might be assassinated while in a russian prison? Why is it that so few outlets have even reported on this.
I noticed this I'm watching this and I'm really quite shocked by this. Why is there? Why is it that so few so called conservatives and conservative outlets reported on this, because I want to address this again. There is a difference, ladies and gentlemen, there is a difference.
Between people who have shorter, very a romantic pacifist, anti war mentality- and I think they're very dangerous, but I'm just saying there's a difference between that report. People may have from their perspective a logic.
An argument that this is an America's war as they say it, and yet people who
Effectively use in more ways than one Putin's talking points in the talking:
to the circuits in the United States and alive
about zeal and see and lie about the ukrainian people, the ukrainian people and not nazis. The president of Ukraine is jewish, his wife's jewish kids, your George, the family, jewish.
You can try and tie in this NEO Nazi group as one of these sort of soap
independent journalist, nincompoop stars. It's a look at this. The government is linked to this group.
The government not promoting the group.
I mean they sound like the left in this country, trying to link conservatives to the NEO
to use in the klansmen white Nationalists and all the rest
this may be, they see a confederate flag or maybe they Harrison.
But he used the n word, or maybe they hear somebody who is an anti spam, and this is amazing. Coming from the media who gives the real anti Semites in this country, they go mar A o c.
Tal Leave, etc, etc, etc. In the democratic party
and many in the media a pass, but the New York Times gets a pass despite its
long history of Anti Semitism. The Democrat Party gets a pass despite its long history of racism, segregation even slavery, they get a pass.
But this guy, who was jailed by Putin, gets almost no attention in this country. Why is there an n, NATO,
act when NATO decides decide going to move more troops to the eastern front of Eastern Europe which borders Ukraine,
I don't understand. Nato is a
what Terry Alliance, why wouldn't they move more troops to eastern to the eastern front where the threats exists? This is bizarre.
People want to know how many troops are, what kind of planes and what you're not going to get tactical information from our government
NATO, why would you? Why would you.
So of course, they're going to move military forces were military forces may need to exist.
So I know you the vast majority view in this audience. We all agree. Our view is quite a traditional view to reckon I'd, feel it's even a trumpet you and I
think that's why sixty three percent of the american people according to Fox what the american people to do more or not just the american people. Let me correct that
The nations of the world to do more in terms of assisting the Ukrainians, not talking about troops, are no fly zones. Why
seventy six percent cent, the proverbs Alinsky. What he's doing, despite the best efforts of Russia
and Russia mouthpieces and eighty five percent believe that you
And does matter to the? U S and our national security versus fourteen percent.
if you listen to the media depending what you list
to radio tv what you read. You would never believe at eighty five to fourteen you believe it's eighty five or fourteen against, but it's not
So are all Americans warmongers or all
cons. Neo coms
all Americans part of the military industrial complex trying to profit from this,
don't think so I'll be right back much folks, I'm here to talk
Do you about something very serious? Have you felt something changing in our country that too many people no longer identify themselves as Americans first, but instead group themselves by race, class or sex that were losing the common idea of justice, the melting pot that unites us? I'm talking about citizenship. Folks, and if we lose the idea of citizenship, then we don't have a country, but there's something you can do get educated and then teach others.
Friends at Helstone College, can show you the way hills deals. New free course on american citizenship will help you learn about what's happening and why the course is taught by our friend Doktor Victor Davis Hansen, who will equip you to help restore our country. You can sign up for free Lavigne for hills. Tell that calm, you'll learn
topics like the history of citizenship, the deep state and even there.
It reset. Please sign up today to take hill styles free course at Levin for Hillsdale dot com. That's Ellie VN, Free Hillsdale, dot, com, Levin for a hillsdale dot com.
american Greatness website is really now standing side.
And it is aligned
Not every way with a president.
Up in his policies and there's.
go there today by Paul Gottfried.
Paleo and Putin,
Card carrying member of the old right for the last fifty years having suffered the slings and indignities that come with it
on the other members of my fraternity, who can't bring themselves to condemned Lattimer Putin's
for his invasion of Ukraine and its destruction of its people, this recognition of Putin's aggression and what it my poor, ten for Ukraine's neighbourhood to the West
it's not been lost on Europeans, including Europeans, on the right marine Layla LE pen
an arrogance, a more in France, the alternative Joycelyn Deutschland in Germany and the present concern
governments of Hungary and Poland. These are all governments, and so forth of the right have all been on record, condemning produce proof that choosing Putin's brutal invasion. None of these figures is in love with woke near sir, is kind words for
what now passes for constitutional government in the west, but they do understand that Putin is a russian expansionist,
And at the murder, and may him he's not-
down on Ukrainians is nothing. Do excuse is nothing new.
At least even worse, atrocities in Chechnya and later in Syria, the attempts to defend Putin's actions in Ukraine proceed from two unshakeable believes. Among US defenders on the traditional american right, the more grandiose explanation is TAT: Putin's the upholder of western conservative values, who has courageously battling algae, BT, Q plus enthusiasts, and his country he's also said- be fighting back rhetorically against attacks on the family. Coming from one time,
constitutional democracy that have fallen into the bands awoke totalitarians, Fewness, also supposedly men of faith, who devotes his energies to defend than the oars
Doc state religion and who is opening up monasteries in rebuilding churches in his country. We therefore cannot criticise him.
thou, endangering his sacred mission. If he smash
Ukrainian cities, while that's the price we pay for all the goodies doing. I've also
hearing from acquaintance that Ukrainian should not really constitute a nation, but are ethnic? Russians were missions
sleep denying their identity. He kept rust settlement. We talked about this yesterday that took place in the tenth century, was carried out by Scandinavians
was supposedly the starting point for the russian National adventure, and so called Ukrainian is just another name for Russian.
Who happened to be living in the area in which the russian state originally took form in any case,
you cranium leader, let em ears Olenska, supposedly just a corrupt lowbrow comic, who is built up by the EU,
government against his godly russian counterpart. You ve heard this on radio and tv. The second
He's in further this ruling depute in his head, he is not responsible for his aggression, the- U S State Department,
and scheming NEO conservatives have created the present. Tensions between the Russians
Ukrainian. This happens to be partially true if we reek out the US government's involvement in the overthrow of a pro russian government in Kiev in February, two thousand and fourteen and Joe Biden's recent hints to the Ukrainians about his fit
for NATO membership neo. Conservatives have incited hatred against Putin's as an anti democratic leader and have been confusing statecraft with eighty illogical wars for decades. I bitterly
person to defend these fanatical warmongers and having suffered profession,
at their hand. I have no reason to like them, but it was Putin, not the neocons who invaded Ukraine
and russian military forces. Not
Victoria Nuland at the State Department of the Wall Street Journal editorial page who
during ukrainian civilians. I keep telling friends
right who want to stress those other circumstances, so called leading to Putin
invasion, that by all means, let's discuss them, but we should preface that discussion by blaming Putin and his military for the havoc. They have wrought
they have behaved outrageously, no matter how defective american foreign policy has been no matter. How repugnant
conservative rhetoric may sound looking at babies
killed and maimed in the streets of car carbon mariupol. It seems to me
The blame should be ascribed to someone more immediately responsible,
blundering: U S! Farm policy maven, Sir Rabbit NEO, conservative journalists without delay.
historical parallels, I can't help noticing the similarities he between Putin's attack on the Ukrainians, who are
fighting like a nation and Hitler's invasion of poles.
in September, nineteen, thirty nine. In both cases, Historians Torrance could cite abuses that the invaded countries committed against members of the nations who are invading them
as in Poland, in particular with the year with the Germans, but
Brutal invasion and occupation characterized by the devastation of civilian populations, that's all
Another story
members of the all right who have told me repeatedly that Abraham Lincoln was wrong to invade the seceded south and that ukrainians have been sorely
transponder, russian real have undergone a staggering folks,
to talk to you about something very serious. Have you felt something changing in our country that too many people no longer identify themselves as Americans first, but instead group themselves by race, class or sex that we're losing the common idea of justice, the melting pot that unites us talking about citizenship? Folks, and if we lose the idea of citizenship and we don't have a country but there's something you can do get educated and then teach others, and my friends at Helstone College can show you the way hills deals. New free course on american citizenship will help you learn about what's happening and why the course is taught by our friend Doktor Victor Davis Hansen, who will equip you to help restore our country. You can sign up for free Levine for hills. Tell that calm, you'll learn
topics like the history of citizenship, the deep state and even the
reset please sign up today to take hill styles free course at Levin for Hillsdale dot com, that's Eli, VN, Free Hillsdale, dot, com, Levin for a hillsdale dot com, the mark Levin, the research, our of conservative media call in now eight seven, seven, three, eight one, three eight one, one alright.
So NATO's approving more troops for the eastern flank, as it should. Certainly, in my opinion, Ukraine's air force. How was it that this air force, which is actually quite small, is doing so well against the the heavily heavily armed
Russian heavily outnumbered was at peace in the New York Times each night ukrainian pilots.
Like annually loiter in an undisclosed,
Chris Hangar waiting waiting waiting until the tension is broken with a shouted one where a command air.
How he hustles into his SU twenty seven supersonic jet and hastily taxis to the runway, getting airborne as quickly as possible, takes off so fast. He doesn't yet know his mission for the night, but the big picture is always the same: to bring the fight to the russian AIR force as avert. That is vastly superior in numbers, but has so far failed to win control the skies above Ukraine. I don't do any checks.
He said the Ukrainian AIR Force Pilot, who had one hundred condition of granting interview, was not permitted to give his surname or rank. I just take off nearly a month into the fighting. One of the biggest surprises of the war in Ukraine is Russia's failure to defeat the Ukrainian AIR Force. Military analysts had expected russian forces to quickly destroy or paralyzed Ukraine's air, defenses and military aircraft. Yet neither is happy
Instead, top gun style, air aerial, dogfights, rare in modern warfare are now raging over the country.
every time when I fly it's for a real fight said the pilot Andrey was twenty five years.
Won't TED missions in the war. Every fight with the russian jets there's no equality; they always have five times
more planes in the year, and you know why their begging for those makes the success of ukrainian pilots as health protection.
Cranium soldiers on the ground and prevented wider bombing in cities. Since pilots have intercepted some russian crews missiles. Ukrainian officials also say the country's military shot down. Ninety seven fixed wing russian aircraft. The number could not be verified by the crumbled remnants of russian jet fighters, have crashed into rivers, fields and house
The Ukraine air forces operating near total secrecy, its fighter jets, can fly from airstrips in western Ukraine. Airports had have been bombed, yet retained
left runway for. Take off sore landings in from highways. Analysts say they're vastly outnumber Russia's believe the fly some two hundred sorties per day, while Ukraine flies nine hundred and fifty five Ukraine. Pilots do have one advantage of most of the country. Russian planes fly over territory controlled by the
military, which can move anti aircraft missiles to harass and even shoot down planes. Ukraine has been effective in this case,
because we operate on our own land yearly and not a spokesman for the Ukrainian AIR Force said the enemy flying and our airspace,
is flying into the zone of our air defence systems. He described the
At a gm luring russian planes into their defensive traps, Dave to patrol the dean of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace studies and the principle,
tat plainer for the desert? Storm air campaign in Iraq said the impressive performance or ukrainian pilots had tub counter their disadvantages in numbers? He said Ukraine AUS roughly fifty five operational fighter jets, a number that is join D, link from shoot down mechanical failures as Ukraine, pilots are stressing them to max performance. I gotta say: don't get these additional migs, I don't know what they're gonna do be. Cranes president's linsky has appealed repeatedly to western governments to replenish the Ukrainian AIR Force and his ass NATO to enforce a no fly zone.
Over the country. A step western leaders, of course, refuse to take Russia troops have already fire nearly one thousand missiles that Ukraine countless bombs. Mr Lehne is Olenska said into a video. Our governments has now it's eleven hundred pilotless drones.
also a tool in ukrainian military Arsenal, but not in the battle for control. The airspace. Ukraine flies turkish made armed drone, the Barrack Car TARP Tb to a plodding propeller aircraft that is legally effective and destroying tank, Sir artillery pieces on the ground, but cannot hit targets in the year if he cranes, air defences,
fail? Russian jets could easily picked them off, as in other aspects of Ukraine's war effort. Volunteers play a role in the air, but also of all turn network, watches and listens to russian jets. Key
and coordinates and estimated speed, and also to other private ukrainian pilots have removed up to date, civilian navigation equipment from their planes,
and have handed over to the air force in case it can be helpful here, Erica
but has been rare and modern war with only isolated examples in recent decades. U S. Pilots, for example, not flown extensive aerial dogfight, since the first
direct war, ninety ninety one! Since then? U S fighter jets, have engaged in air to air combat on just a few occasions, shooting down ten planes in the balkan wars. One plain in Syria: according to Mr Dep Tula.
the night sky and wholly this is the ukrainian pilot. Seti relies on instruments to discern the positions of enemy planes which he says are always present. He shot down russian Jasper
is not permitted to say how many or which type
He said his targeting system can fire at planes a few dozen miles away most
if tests of hitting airborne targets of intercepting enemy jets, he said I wait for the missile to lock on my target and then I press,
when he shoots down a russian jet. He said I am happy that
This plain when no longer by my peaceful towns and as we see in practice, that is exactly what russian jets are doing.
Mostly the Earl Combat in Ukraine has been nocturnal as russian aircraft attack in the dark when they are less vulnerable. They are defenses in the dog
it's over Ukraine Armilly said the Russians have been flying and a re, a modern Sequoia jets, such as the s you thirty, as you thirty Foreign S, you thirty five.
You said I'd situations when I was approaching a russian jet to close enough distance to target and fiery said I could already detected but was waiting for my missile tools
on while at the same time, from the ground.
tell me that a missile was fired at me already.
He said he maneuvered his jet through a series of extreme banks, dives and climbs in order to exhaust the fuel supplies of the missiles coming after him. He said that
I might have to save. Myself depends on how far the missile was fired at me and what kind of missile
God is such a brave man, brave man. These pilots are as brave as can be
till. He said in an interview on a clear sunny day. I can still feel a huge rush of adrenalin, my body, because every fight is a fight and every flight is a fight annually. Graduate
From the car key, therefore school after deciding to become a pilot as a teenager
neither me nor my friends ever thought we would have to face a real war. He said, but that's not how it turned out. Angeles moved his wife to a safer,
are Ukraine, but she has not left the country said she spends her days, weaving homemade, camouflage
it's for the ukrainian army? He never.
As family members when he's gone.
on duty. He said calling only after returning from a night flight. They only have to use my skills to win he's,
My skills are better than the Russians, but on the other day many of my
engine. Even more experience than me are already dead. They need more jet.
They need more makes sixty three percent of the american people believe so as well, and that includes a majority, a good majority Republicans and want to go.
back to this fox poll? Just so, you know you're, not in the minority, as you would think,
depending on who you're listening to and how much you're listening to. I see here Mister producer and pulling it up looking for it. Ah boy, sixty three percent of the public says we should be doing more to help the Ukrainians. Seventy six per cent say that they view the Lens
in a very positive light. Eighty five per cent say Ukraine matters to the United States. What do you think of that? I think are right now, let us or let us dig a little bit more deeper into this. How about Republicans and let's take a look
this is, I pull it up. Eighty two percent are concerned about the invasion. Seventy six percent approve of ukrainian President Zelensky. How he's responded to the issue
Kratz Republicans large, you agree, and ninety percent of Democrats and eighty five percent of Republicans think what happens in Ukraine makes a difference here at home, made in ten Democrats and Republicans approval, Zalenski and two slash three.
Party, want to do more for Ukraine, there is almost no difference between the parties on this almost no difference in these in
over overwhelming. So the nation is united. In this we have the Outlander.
Here's some of them. You see some of them. You read. Some of them are the outliers, some of them repute nights. Some of them are pacifists, some of them just legitimate,
opposed this they look at Afghanistan and Iraq and men
there are very young and they see the whole world through Afghanistan and Iraq and those wars rather than through the bigger picture
a war war too, and circumstances like that
You don't hear a lot of novel thinking for most of these people. It's like why. Why? Because we don't want to
their war. Will you send your kids if we're going to watch the you
brain borders. Should we watch cars and there's an answer to all that, because that's really silly, but we ought to watch her border. What does that have to do with the ukrainian border? Nothing. So what's the point of that kind of
we should be securing our border and helping the Ukrainians
You gonna going to send your child. What kind of an argument is there between about national policy? I don't
kid, a cop tricky to fire fighter. You gonna send your kid into a burning building, you're gonna say I mean that's not the point of a military to projector own,
personal life. On top of the military. You re standing professional military and shall we get to a draft, then everybody's firm,
will be affected by that, but until then the norm,
tear army, the oven,
Majority of Americans are not okay,
and what about this argument that we could be causing nuclear war Werner, causing anything we didn't invade anybody we didn't threaten any by. We ve been extremely passive, very pass.
And provocations, if any that occurred here is a result of the possibility of the present it who's in the oval office. Right now,.
The way he surrendered to the Afghans, that is
Taliban, I should say in
he is surrendering and providing the Islam or knots regime in Tehran with everything they want. Look even before this.
what I said
That our enemies are rooting for Biden now
rooting for him more than ever more than ever
we'll be right back then folks, I'm here to talk.
do about something very serious. Have you felt something changing in our country that too many people no longer identify themselves as Americans first, but instead group themselves by race, class or sex that we're losing the common idea of justice, the melting pot that unites us talking about citizenship? Folks and if we lose the idea of citizenship than we don't have a country, but there's something you can do, get educated and then teach others and my friend said hills to college, can show you the way Hills deals, new free course on american citizenship or help you learn about what's happening, and why the course is taught by our friend Doktor Victor Davis Hansen, who will equip you to help restore our country. You can sign up for free Levine for Hills, Delbert, COM, you'll, learn
Topics like the history of citizenship, the deep state and even there
It reset please sign up today to take hills, styles, free course at Levin for Hillsdale dot com, that's Ellie, VN, Free Hillsdale, dot, com, Levin for Hillsdale dot com. The next hour. I want to jump into the Supreme
Claudia Schiffer. Let me start now,
you're, lauded as a historic pity, because you, the first black
whenever nominated to serve in the United States, Supreme Court Run.
Near ass by another woman, a senator
from Tennessee Marsha Blackburn to define woman.
and you say: you're, not a biologist. Are you a biologist, MR producer? Your biologists, Mr Cosgrove
I'm not a biologist, but I can define a woman not particularly complicated. Yes, most little kids can, if they haven't been brainwashed yet so what exactly is the problem here? The problem here is that this is an extremely radical nominee.
with a very nice personality, and she knows how to define a woman. But she also knows if she d
Fines are women. The old fashioned way like a biologist, as a matter of fact or like a third greater, shall come under attack from the algae Bt Q. I plus community.
And she wants to be able to rule on these cases, which clearly will come to the Supreme Court as virtually every culture issue. Does
because the court has nationalized that area of public life and has taken it.
when done great damage to it. So the first blow
woman or african american woman, nominated to serve on the Supreme Court will not define woman were told. This is historic, she's a black woman, but she cannot define woman,
Well, she can't define woman and woman, doesn't mean woman and a pretty use words like, rather than she it or birthing person. Then, what's so historic.
If we cannot recognize that she is in fact the first black
woman to be nominated to the Supreme Court and we cannot define woman
then, what's so historic, I'm confused, but there's no need to be its utterly illogical and they do this. They do this. Why? Because their pushing a perversion their pushing a lie, the pushing and immorality? That's why and there are bracing it and she,
I want to show that she is in fact, as radical. As everybody really know, she is particularly her supporters. Let me say some
about little Dick Durbin, the chairman of this committee, little Dick, is acting like he's the poem
he's, cutting off legitimate areas of inquiry based on what Ketanji
Brown Jackson is actually written and actually said and actually ruled.
and this is a no no. Ladies and gentlemen, you can accuse a Cavanaugh who I've never liked, but you can accuse him of gangrape. You can go back to his
high school year book? Looking for pictures, ask him about beer. Ask him about his sex life, go on and on and on try and destroy the man, and you can do it at the last second.
cause your media support. But if you ask contain
a brown Jackson. Can you define woman?
apparently you're a racist and you're blowing a dog whistle
more when I return podcast
lucidly sponsored by pure talk. Pure talk offers great coverage.
Save your family money on your wireless bill, every single month go to pure talk, dot com to find the plan. That's right for you. Thank you again for listening and thank you so much,
sponsorship. Your talk now broadcasting on roaming, underground commandos than the bowels of a hidden bunker somewhere under Britain, steel of alarm the script building it we once again made contact with our leader. Tell America Mark Levant here our number eight seven, seven, three one, three, eight one, one, eight, seven, seven, three, eight one, three of three eight one, one James T project their cars will be here this hour to discuss frankly what our governments been doing to his organizations. Absolutely shocking shocking when they target you what happened
Little Dick Durbin today at the hearing for Canton Brown Jackson he's covering up forty eight thousand pages of documents from the sentencing commission, because, obviously
There are things in there. They do not want us to know before they push her onto the Supreme Court for a lifetime. Appointment caught one go: yes,
the turn of your nomination, turned out to be a testing ground for conspiracy theories and culture war theories say this is a thing there hasn't been as passive adhering, even though there was some passion here, but it's passable hearing in a couple of decades, as you've seen with this nominee.
But you simply are not allowed to ask questions your
Simply not allowed to use the individual's own writings and words to raise questions about her radicalism, the same writings in words that the White House bind the Democrats embraced in order to see
what her nomination in the first place this same riding in words the radical radical marxist groups, use to run a
money campaign to support her.
And so to even raise questions about. What's on, the public record is a bridge too far for the american marks go ahead,
the more bizarre the charges against you and your family,
Restoring the social media scoreboard lit up your streets. Is someone against her family? Mister Bellew nobody's done anything to her family home. You know who's in her family.
Go ahead, sorry that we have to go through this. These are not there,
is there in the mainstream of America, but they agreed and presented here
what what what what theories you know this coward will never come on the show. I want you to ask him again to come on the show mister producer
Little Dick has never wanted to come on. The show previous reasons MIKE Lee says that the carpet
What is the problem here? Why you calling our legitimate questions a tax cut to go? Most of this information was public
in the Washington Post five days ago. Alright, this is
confidential information when the Holly attack on
judge started. We requested more information. The White House did
And then shared it with us within the day, and you now have the same copy that we have in store. Is it fair for you to characterize
similar Holly's questions or the questions raised by any of us as an attack. I do not have as our sole attack. This is agent with greater other legitimate question regarding our
It's in regarding the most heinous crimes imaginable outcome. Although these your rid legitimate questions, Mister King, went, don't call them attacks like and just tell you I've characterize them is attacks.
other things as well. I think it's pretty clear:
What's going on here, abuse MAC, you pots, Mr Chairman,.
Marsha Blackburn. At the hearing yesterday cut three go: can you provide?
the definition for the word woman can I provide
I definition, though yeah I can't you can't.
A case kind to act like I'm not ready should serve on the Supreme Court, who cannot provide a definition of women are refused,
because they have a a radical extreme political agenda, start from the top again cut three go.
Can you provide a definition for the word woman? Can I
By definition, though yeah I can't you can't,
your case contact, though not in biology of the word woman, is so unclear and controversial. The two can't give me a definition.
senator in my work as a judge
What I do is I address disputes. If there
a dispute about a definition. People make
Arguments disputes right now, there's litigation that it will work its way to the Supreme Court over the definition of a woman, and apparently this judge fines is very controversial, so controversial might to feed her nomination and Dick Durban finds this same concern.
SIRI, but he's always been a very, very stupid individual go ahead. I
so I'm not. The fact that you,
You can't give me a straight answer about something.
As fundamental
What a woman is underscores the dangers of the kind of progressive education that we are hearing about.
Just last week, an entire generation of young girls. What.
It is our taxpayers: funded institutions permitted a bias
Magical man to compete and beat a biology.
go woman in the end
double swimming championships. What message?
You do you think this, since two girls who aspire to come
eat and women and sport.
at the highest levels.
Not sure what message
it sends if, if you're asking me about the legal issues related to it
Those are topics that are being hotly
As it is, you say I could come to the court, so they could come to the court
which is why you were a circling back. What's your definition of a woman.
and at a one side of your mouth you say: well, I'm a judge. You know why I you know I I handle disputes,
and then you ended by saying this matter could come before the court matter of what.
the courts not going to decide what a man or a woman is seriously.
I would ask the male justices to use the men's room or the ladies' room. I would ask the female justices: do you use,
Ladies room of the men room men through, I suspect.
The female justices use the ladies' room,
male justices use the mail and unless, of course, they were bare from in their own office, which they may TED crews cut forego
So yesterday, under under questioning from Senator Blackburn, you told her that that you couldn't define what a woman is
that you are not a biologist which, which I think you're the only Supreme Court nominee in history, who's been unable to answer
the question. What is a woman,
I ask you, as a judge.
Would you determine if a plaintiff had
I three standing
to challenge a gender based rule regulation policy. Without being
to determine what a woman was
so Senator. I know that I'm a woman, I know that Senator Blackburn is a woman and the woman who I
admire most in the world, is in the room today. My mother
sounded is, though, well but little last June, but why am I ask and under the modern leftist sensibilities if, if.
I decide right now that that I'm a woman, then
apparently I'm a woman? Does that mean that I would have article three standing to challenge a gender based restriction
to the extent that you are asking me about who has the ability to bring lawsuits based on gender? Those kinds of issues are working their way through the courts, and I am not able to comment on them. Ok, if you, if I can change,
engender. If I can be a woman and then an hour later. If I decide I'm not a woman anymore, I guess I would lose article three standing. Tell me does that same principle
apply to other protected characteristics were example, I'm I'm in a smack man could good. I decide. I was an asian man. What what what I have the ability to be an aged man and
in charge discrimination because I made the decision.
I am not able to answer your question. You're asking.
About hypotheticals and how you would assess standing? If, if I came in and said, have decided an asian man-
would assess standing the way I assess other legal issues, which is to listen.
To the arguments made by the parties. Consider the relevant
precedents,
and the constitution,
principles involved and make a determination while
a long way around? Isn't it must reduce and that's it perfectly sensible line of questions way over the head of anybody? Who is a host, a guest producer director executive? It s hollow sti, beyond their comprehension and of course same was CNN. So here we are the insanity of the left.
needs to be addressed in this hearing, but she won't answer the questions and the Democrats don't care. So I want all of you to know all of you. Parents out there who are concerned about your children. The Democrats do not.
Care. I'll, be right back much. I've been telling
Folks, for a long time, if you're still with Verizon eighteen to your t, mobile you're, simply paying too much for wireless, because pure talk gives you the same exact, great five g coverage for a fraction of the cost, but don't take my word for it: listen to what Chris
four from grand Forks North Dakota has to say said I used to
we a Verizon customer before switching to pure talk, and I absolutely love it. Pure talk has the same great service that Verizon does and a little over a half of the cost, and I got to keep my phone thank you for being such a great company.
You should join me and make the switch right now get
limited talk text and six gigs of data for just thirty dollars a month. So do this go to pure talk. Dot com find the plan, the trade for you,
This month enter promo code, Levin Podcast, that's l, e v, I n podcast and you'll save an additional fifty percent off your first month. That's pure talk, dot com promo,
code, Levin, podcast the reminder I'll Hannity tonight on Fox nine thirty pm eastern time we James O'Keefe
say a brilliant young invest.
The gate of reporter an organisation that is created, project veritable Jane
seems like the governor,
has been illegally well illegal.
Tracking you guys explained us what's going on here, yes, Martin
bombshell, report, Microsoft, corporation legal documents released by Project VERITAS revealed
The department of Justice filed a series of secret
french orders in order to spy on Project VERITAS, and then they tried to gag order. Microsoft from from
talking about it. This is an with Ashley of Diary Matter, Biden, diary matter that the FBI had rated me back in November and then the federal judge
the master over this issue? But now is we ve uncovered Microsoft, cooperation
how's Microsoft Outlook determine justice, went to Microsoft, got my emails and asked Microsoft to keep quiet about it. This goes back to January two thousand and twenty
eight months before we even were made aware of his diary.
Do you know to this day what emails were turned over to the government by Microsoft, and we don't know that we, we believe, all of their data, tanned, all these emails and again, eight months prior to us even learning about the diary and then doing some reporting again we didn't publish this Ashley Biden diary. I thought.
I might I couldn't get corroborated, but what's most troubling about this development, and this isn't an extraordinary series of events for the Department of Justice to spy on journalists is that, after the special master was appointed by this article, three judge in New York in December, the article three judge cited journalistic privilege. First amendment issues. Then the government went back to Microsoft.
I tried to get a continuance on this gag order. This is USA, twenty seven o five to prevent Microsoft from telling us a journalism organization that the government had seized our emails so mark. Apparently, the the Department of Justice went behind the federal judges back to spy on journalists. The only other precedent for this during the Trump administration. They tried to do this to Google, but they didn't try to gag Google, so the New York
fight them. This is unprecedented to the fundamental abridgment of the first amendment. We never seen anything like it in modern history and clearly project us must be doing something right for them to talk. It's me like this.
And the thing is to be perfectly honest with you. If you had published this diary, you still would have been on fairly firm footing because you didn't steal the diary. You were the recipient of the diary. Let me ask you,
more questions here, James, because this really is appalling. Do we know what entity within the Biden Administration or within the government I should say, has been involved in this or is it F b? I is that the
mobile division. Is it? Is the Eu S attorney's office in the southern district? Who is it, it was born,
streets of New York, which is the federal jurisdiction of southern New York. State
the New York City. We do not know who authorized this for
was it the attorney General United States, the attorney General United States. America expressly forbids
the addition of search warrants against journalists? For obvious reasons, journalists work with sources if a source obtain something improperly? The journalist still has a first amendment right to publish what were given so long as we played no part in the act
wiring of that document and that's what happened here. We don't even think the diary was stolen. It appears to have not been. It appears to have been abandoned, but we still have the first amendment right to look into the matter when someone sends or something so they would never do this, of course, to the New York Times marketed these other organizations and they attack us for being quote non journalists. In fact, the US attorneys in the southern
argued before the judge that were not journalists and the reasoning that we don't get permission from the people that we report on which
the thing to say feel it and it's exactly why project character exists because we don't work in concert with the government. We investigate the government and they at the New York Times and Washington Post often times do work in concert with the government. So to answer your question, it's the southern district. We don't know whether Washington Department of Justice authorize this. We don't know if it was someone just in New York City, but what's remarkable is that I don't think they ever anticipated us getting that special master, and especially two months ago in January, they went back to Microsoft and asked them to gag at Microsoft, wrote emotion, trying to challenge it. The government backed down this week, someone in Microsoft, contacted me and said James. This is happening, and now we've found out mark this week. Uber corporation also had this happen to them
So for all we know they went to all the Department of Justice went to all of our vendors and got everything emails texts uber, you name it. This is unbelievable, so you're going to go back to the master and what are you going to ask the master project? Your thoughts are just filed a motion in court. Yesterday we went to the federal judge because they went through six magistrate: judges, apparently behind the federal judge's back booklet. Both many of this much of this happened prior to the special master being appointed,
the they went back to these magistrates in January two months ago after the special master been appointed, and they asked to for a continuance on this non disclosure order. Gagging these corporations, so we might were going back to the judge and we're asking them to have to take a look at this and and to um immediately cease are doing what they're doing we've filed a motion. Yesterday I made the motion public. I'm and the southern district of New York has basically lost to retribution campaign. That does violence to the first amendment and while this special master litigation proceeded,
The government obviously misled the court by omission, failing to inform it failing to inform officers, journalists and and that the government already obtained the contents of the privileged emails from us, including sources and donor information from our cloud. This is just such an egregious violation. It just says that such damage to the first amendment, I'm.
and and the government already had the opportunity to review project retarded journalistic attorney, client privilege materials even before they
I did process with the special master
You only have a minute. So if you don't mind, I'd like to hold you over you've got the sort of sort of two avenues of attack against two. At the same time, you've got this New York Times activity
got the government, even though there is an overlay- and
I assume they're on separate legal tracks. Is that correct? That is correct.
Although they often work in concert with each other and
when we come back I'd like to know what's the status of the New York Times case
And I want to further pursue the egregious activity of the.
increasingly, I would call this regime in Washington DC will be right back with joy.
It's O'Keefe project,
who's on the front lines of fighting, for our liberty will be right that I've been telling you
works for a long time, if you're still with Verizon. Eighteen to your t, mobile you're, simply paying too much for wireless, because pure talk gives you the same exact, great five g coverage for a fraction of the cost, but don't take my word for it. Listen
Christopher from Grand Forks North Dakota has to say said: I used to
a Verizon customer before switching to pure talk- and I absolutely love it- you are talk- has the same great service that Verizon does and a little over a half of the cost, and I got to keep my phone. Thank you. For being such a great company,
Well, she should join me and make the switch right now, get unlimited talk text and six gigs of data for just thirty dollars a month. So do this go to pure talk, dot com find the plane
the tried for you then, this month,
a promo code, Levine Podcast, that's l, E, the iron podcast and you'll save an additional fifty percent off your first month. That's pure talk, dot com, promo
code Levin Podcast the mark Levin Great One, the great one Mark Levin dial in now, eight seven, seven, three, a one three, eight one one James O'Keefe is my guest project, VERITAS, first of all, James. If people want to support your group, where did they go? Thank you
project veritas. Dot com is a website where registered. One c three with the IRA
If your donations are tax deductible, also VERITAS puts at Protonmail, that's the e r, I PS tips at protonmail dot com. Obviously we're talking about the F B, I rating us and the Department of Justice now issuing secret
water is secret warrants against our email, vendors to spy on us, but Marcus has not deterred our sources. In fact, more people than ever are coming to us through Protonmail or including inside the the department defense when he broke that story two months ago, an Anthony patchy, but let us be clear so far:
federal law enforcement, southern district of New York likely the public integrity section of the criminal division, and perhaps other aspects of department of Justice have
number one used swat to grab you and grab information from you, and it really.
To this diary of Biden's daughter of which you
diary. You did not use that's number one, and nor did you steal it.
Number two: you now know they have put out these secret warrants so that you can't challenge them in court to Microsoft and maybe others for all. You know to get
emails of yours and Yorick organizations and innovation.
In your organization,
your consent without your knowledge, so you could challenge it. The reason for subpoenas you could challenges a subpoena, so they use the
secret warrant, as you call it or as they call it. I suppose to get this syndrome,
nation, to this day you dont know exactly what they took and now you're
back in federal court, challenging that and obviously are being targeted. There's no question about it
so the trying to take it down you yap and then
the other side. We have this New York Times case remind everybody what that is and where you are with that
Yes, where we see the near tired for defamation mark back last year, they said that we were given part of a coordinated this information campaign. All we did was quote a maniac
the man on tape, saying he was harvesting ballots? I quoted him saying this and I said I was coordinated disinformation I sued for defamation and I won a historic victory. In that case, we got passed motion to dismiss in New York Supreme Court. It's a very difficult hurdle to get past. As you all may know, I'm a public figure and I have to prove malice. I proved it at least the judge thought I did to get that far because the New York Times defended itself in court by saying your honor. It's just our opinion and then the judge replied, but you put it in the first sentence of the news article in the section of the New York Times, so they get passed motion to dismiss and then the F b I rates my home in November and remind your audience. What happened is within within minutes of my being in handcuffs federal agents. Put me in handcuffs
We published this video last week mark on online. It's terrifying video! Actually, it's it's! Actually it's violent! What they did to me and my family, and they came in with a battering ram- they put me in cuffs at six, am on a Saturday. They took my phones and then and then within minutes. I got a text message from a national security reporter
New York Times and somehow knows the subject of the search warrant knows all these intimate details. So the southern district of New York, that's the federal jurisdiction in New York, the Department of Justice's United States attorneys. There are working in concert with the New York Times National security reporters and then Mark just in December. They published by attorney client privilege memos. All of this again comes on the heels we just found this out this week that the Department of Justice issued so secret warrants against Microsoft. Corp we use outlook
Well, as you believe, uber corporation and God knows how many other vendors- and there are obtaining all of our private information- this is so unprecedented. It and, and and the New York Times has been, has been sort of working in concert with the southern district sort of, I guess
goal is to get me incarcerated. These are journalists at the New York Times. It's what they call themselves. They're angry that I'm suing them, and this is what happened
This country, when you try to do the right thing to you, try to tell the truth. Try to hold people accountable. They want to destroy you.
After you, we will not be intimidated. I will not stop. I will not bear false witness. I will not. I an innocent
man. I'd never break the law and- and- and I hope with this- and I know that this will blow back in their faces, including and then by the way, God bless Microsoft or if you go to upset, you can read the motion they filed. They defended the first amendment. They they went after the government and and the government backed down this week and and and
and then these these mag orders, these twenty seven, oh five, be secret warrants are now public, thanks to Microsoft, fighting the Department of Justice here,
Now this has the cost some money to your organization and for you, how do you raise this million
We re at the body we leave bought, we we have tens of thousands of jobs.
all donors, many of which listen to this program and and
and I don't take it for granted by the grace of God and the hard work of my employees, we just work as hard as we can
raising money, but we don't we we don't have a commercial imperative. We have no advertising, we were not for hire. Where were the nonprofit investigative NEWS organization and the legal bills are in the millions and obviously that's
Probably one of the objectives is to where you down and where you out, but we
never really lost the this litigation fight. We an end were continuing to win and and mark. The question is: does this federal Judge Analisa Torres is her name in the southern district who appointed the special?
after that, the legal term special overseer because of journalistic privilege and first amendment,
privilege in this case she appointed a special master over the FBI. What is going to be the consequence for these prosecutors going behind her back and doing secret spying on us? There are, I think there will be. I think that she's not going to like that and I'm, and we hope that there is going to be a consequence, but most people sold in this life. Most people don't keep going most people get worn out, get you'll get bankrupted by this and we refuse to be defeated and we depend upon your
he has. The support of the project will not come project their task. I come MR producer. Let slap them up on my social side says
as limited as they are. That's project, VERITAS, DOT, com, America,
also put it on at least for the evening
on the mothership website. Mark Levin show dot com where a lot of people do go and, of course, people also
here hear this on my podcast that project veritas dot com what's being done here is a disgusting disgrace, and these people need to be exposed
and we need to make sure that you have the funds to continue to.
And yourself and pursue them, so I would encourage all of you to to provide a tax exempt or tax deductible better, yet a tax deductible contribution to project vera.
us, okay, James, keep us informed on both fronts again. Thank you. Thank you. Mark
God bless all of you and stay tuned. Alright, God bless you too.
did you ever think it see nothing like this? It's really it's a shocking Qatar G Brown Jackson is not just soft on crime she's a disaster when it comes
oh yeah. She would hunt down January Sixth, trespass
It is to the end of the earth. She would have Donald Trump's tax.
Turns hunted down to the end of the earth, but do not even ask her questions about child
biography and her lenient sentences. Her sentences under the sentencing guidelines her excuses
In which he handed out weak sentences to true perverts and dangerous men, mostly.
look at child pornography on their computers. As an example Lindsey, Graham you gotta, give him credit, he's been pounding away, Lindsey grants to continuity grounds,
accident or hearing today cut my go senator with respect.
The computer, one of the most effective deterrence is one that I am posed
the case and that judges across the country.
The imposed in every case, which is substantial, said, stand
Charles Supervision
lay wonder, judge you think it is a bigger deterrent to take some
who's on a computer. Looking at
images of children and the most
State way is to supervise their
cheater habits versus putting them in jail,
No senator! I didn't exactly what you said. I think the best way to deter people from getting
computer and doing thousands and hundreds in overtime
They may and the population the hull of children being its
Lord, it and abused every time. Somebody click zone is the put their ass in jail, not supervised their computer usage
Senator I wasn't talking about versus you just said he thought it was a deterrent to supervise them. I dont think as a deterrent and think the deterrent is pulling. My jail, certainly have a deterrent component. You see there is. There is little Dick little dick turban interfering little Dick turban who couldn't contribute enough to the smearing.
And libeling of kavanaugh- and he wasn't the only one, the little dick was involved- and I told you before over the years, Senator Fred Thompson was a friend of mine, Senator from Tennessee
many of you will remember he ran for president. I thought he would have been a great present. That also was a movie actor and a prosecutor for years, good
and unfortunately, passed away early in his life. But we were free
and he once told me over dinner that Dick Durban was the least trustworthy, biggest scoundrel and the Senate? Forty topping that's what he told me and you can hear it go ahead.
The sentencing have a deterrent component. Yes, senator deterrence is one of the purposes of punishment and Congress has directed courts
do consider various
means of achieving deterrence, one of them
as you said, is
incarceration another, as I
Tried to mention was
substantial periods of supervision once the person, if I could may ask you in your view, is more of a deterrent to have
somebody substantially supervised in terms of their computer use who's looking at child pornography than it is to put,
in jail, senator I'm not saying it's more or less glued you're. So what I did, what exactly what she sang, because those
pointed supervise use if you're already in jail right, MR producer,
you're you're letting the person out of jail and in Louisville
in jail, you're, giving them very, very substantial supervision. Then what
saying is what are talking about at first
there is never going to be enough supervision of what they do and the computer. But what are you talking about? What kind of it the Terran is this I am not so
It's more or less yes, you are, he says and he's right, that's exactly what you're saying you're giving them supervised, supervised use of their computer as opposed to being in jail. That's exactly what she said. No wonder little Dick Durbin felt the need to interrupt this. Lady is choose me. We can define lady, we can define woman
This person is a disaster I'll be right. Back Ahmed I've been telling you.
hugs for a long time, if you're still with Verizon a t and t t mobile you're, simply paying too much for wireless, because pure talk gives you the same exact, great five g coverage for a fraction of the cost, but don't take my word for it. Listen
Christopher from Grand Forks North Dakota has to say said. I used to
a Verizon customer before switching to pure talk- and I absolutely love it- you are talk- has the same great service that Verizon does and a little over half of the cost, and I got to keep my phone thank you for being such a great company,
you should join me and make the switch right now get
limited talk text and six gigs of data for just thirty dollars a month. So do this go to pure talk, DOT find the plane.
The tried for you, then this month,
promocodes dot com
mode, Levine POD guest of well aware, there's a lot going on in your lives and in the world, but this is what
the things that must be the topic was.
About this radical nominee that Joe Biden wants to impose on you all you, parents out there and grandparents, you need to listen to me in two thousand and thirteen Wesley Hawkins pled guilty to possession of child pornography.
recommended prison time sentencing guidelines. Ninety seven to one hundred and twenty one months, the prosecutor recommended twenty four months. He got probation in eighteen months, Judge Canton G Brown Jackson, sentenced him to just three months in prison in twenty nineteen Hawkins reoffended. She sentenced him to three months in prison,
three months? Three months, the guidelines said ninety seven to one hundred and twenty one months. Prosecutors had twenty four months with probation for eighteen months. Judge Brown, Jackson sensed him just three months in prison and he re offended two and a half years ago. She Walt define a woman because she's part of the radical
gender? She is promoted critical race theory, but she warning knowledge that, because she's part of thy radical engine she's been pro buying, an air tight, try
while she's been on the bench in Washington D C, highly political they're, desperate to get her on the bench as fast as they can.
If she were a black woman who was conservative, like another judge, grounds should be fell, be filibustered and stopped way round was for two years by Joe Biden.
I'll be right back. Ladies!
gentlemen. I want to ask you a question: did you
Withdrawing your cash from the bank can be very risky. That's right.
Banks are required to spy on us for the government and the report any
Maybe they think a suspicious it's true.
shocked. When I read the secret war on cash from Swiss America, the new
or against cash is really a war against the constitution against.
while freedom, loving Americans, so you need
Read the war on cash, get your free copy by calling
eight hundred six three zero fourteen. Ninety two, eight hundred
six hundred and thirty one thousand four hundred and ninety two
America, dot com, this war,
Cash is growing daily and also includes
all forms of digital money, please.
And read the secret oral cash Free Tom, my listeners, by calling now eight huh
Six three zero fourteen. Ninety two: eight hundred six trees.
One thousand four hundred and ninety two
Swiss America, dot com, the no broadcasting from the underground command post, the bowels of a hidden bunker somewhere under the brick and steel over nondescript building. We have once again made contact with our leader mark the american mark. Levin here are number eight seven seven
three hundred and eighty one, thirty, eight thousand one hundred and eighteen, seventy seven, thirty, eight one hundred and thirty eight eleven. So I see it
Cavanaugh, never raped any body, never molested any body. There was never any thing to it, yet they smeared the hell out of this man.
And yet men who are involved in child pornography, particularly those who consume it. They deserve a break. This is according to the. I don't even know how to say this anymore. How do you define a woman if Judge Brown Jackson can't to find a woman? I don't know how I'm supposed to define a woman. I mean there is the old fashioned explanation, but
it's just too old fashioned, I'm too square Josh Hawley, who really led the effort here early on the confirmation hearing yesterday asked her why she apologized to a convicted pedophile at a sentencing hearing
Fourteen go. You also said to to this individual, who is an adult
tried as adults, eighteen years old. You also said to him besides entity
the victims were his peers. You also
there's no reason to think that you are a pedophile.
And then you went on to say again. That's another reason why you weren't going
give him your only going to give him three months, because you would to judge that he wasn't a pedophile and then you said- and this is something I'd I really
need. Your help. Understanding venue up
just to him- and I don't have to
I can't quite figure this out.
I! This is a truly difficult situation. I appreciate
Did your families in the audience, I feel so sorry for them and for you and for
anguish. This
caused all of you. I feel terrible about the collateral consequences of this
fiction and then you go sex offenders are truly shunned in our society.
Short? If your judge is here,
make them here or the victims, the victims, Europe saying that you
are you're apologizing to him, you're, saying you're, sorry for the anguish. This is caused him. There was a victim in,
statement. In this case,
It didn't get read into the record, but it was there. I've described
The videos that we have you say earlier in the case you talk about how heinous these crimes aren't you describe them to your credit, you describe how heinous it is to your
and yet here you are
giving him three months and
ology icing to him and saying you feel sorry for the anguish it's caused him and also
You think that sex offenders are truly shunned in our society. So just just talk,
help me understand immunity. Is he a victim? Is that your view here? Is that what you said this is that we can,
amateur I I
again don't have the entire record. I remember in that particular
I considered it to be unusual in
for the reasons that I described
by the way for all you, Joe Manchin fans out there when he was
confronted in a hallway arrest question somewhere by reporter about the kind of questions that were asked this nominee. He said I was at Josh Hallway. Well, what expect you only wish? You had half the intelligence of Josh Holly, Mr Mansion, that you do not have.
that you do not have, and so you would see it would seem to me. Ladies and gentlemen, there are so many people are so many people. There would seem to me that this woman is unqualified to be a Supreme court justice, not because of a race or genital you're, not because
Or intelligence, not because of her her educational pedigree having gone to Harvard and so forth, but because of her parents who are both, I believe, educators because she's a radical activists leftist, that's what that's why she's unqualified you won't get a fair break in front of this court in this courts being treated by buying, and the Democrats, like some kind
hola, Para, not a single one of them, not a single Democrat on this committee, not single Democrat in the Senate,
I matter not a single Democrat in the house, even though they don't have a vote. Not one has objected to this nomination, not one
In fact, you haven't heard a o c complain: Talib Omar
you haven't heard any of them complain.
New York times- is all in washed and posters. All in an joy reads. All in all.
Joy read over it. I myself see what
she had to say, cut fifteen go. We know that they don't care about protecting.
Women and Girls-
protecting them from things like rape or child
You are a sick.
You are truly evil, you're, just evil. The facts.
I have a media platform of any kind- is amazing to me shocking disgusting, you're, just you're just a disgrace.
other than discuss what this nominee has done in her career, how she has ruled what she has written and I'm not going to play this for you. She goes into the
Thomas hearings, the allegations against him,
When are the allegations against him, which he called credible, the attacks on tromp the
allegations against him and by the way Stormy Daniels lost. Her case knows Trump three hundred thousand dollars, she's just repulsive and thuggish, repulsive and thuggish, which is what she uses for to define you cut sixteen.
What they care about is performing because their real job, much like Margie Green, is not to legit
it is to perform to perform for the Fox NEWS audience to perform for
right. Voters who are terrified that their children will learn that slavery was bad and that those who dared ask questions about.
This nominees background, her essays her writings, her opinions, things. She said it seminars, then you're just perform
for the far right you see, jewelry doesn't really believe in equality or equity. She doesn't believe people should be treated the same way job.
Italy believes that this nominee should skate without any questions whatsoever being asked. Why have a hearing she's a historic figure, even though she doesn't admit that half of the reason she was chosen can in fact be defined, but she chooses not to define it. The
Idiocy that this represented during the hearings was not the senators who were questioning brown
some but a brown Jackson and that entire movement, and so
We have this repulsive thuggish joy red, throwing up everything she could think of slavery, slavery, q and on how she does this later on, I'm just not blowing up. He went on she's a rawhide case. She's upset she's unhinged.
And so are her guests and clearly some the executives at MSNBC, NBC and Comcast. Who insist that this fool
should be unleashed on the american people, but the american people are buying it CNN's going
to go through a a complete change.
If you will. I transition.
And MSNBC won't be that far behind, because at some point you're going to cut your ties to Comcast and you're, going to tell them why cuz, you cannot stand these racists, these bigots these buffoons. May I say these radical Democrats who are on television these american Marxists.
Because that's what they are I'll be right back
As ladies and gentlemen, the time to time, we take a look at a race that affects all
as well as a particular congressional district or state, were take
in North Carolina this evening. People who get elected
the Senate vote on issues that affect us all. It's like a Supreme Court justice is
in just a matter for inside the Bell way. It's a matter for all of us TED Bundy,
running in a crowded primary republican field.
To be the nominee for the Senate in North Carolina TED Budd TED. How are you
and tell the nation about yourself mark. It is an honor to be with you in enjoyed
at you a couple weeks ago,
in North Carolina as the Donald J Trump endorsed candidate for us Senate two. Twenty twenty two has made a huge difference, got a great relationship of working with,
Trump supporting America first policies, since I was first elected also in two thousand and sixteen for the Us Congress came through a big primary. Like you mentioned, I'm I'm a conservative fighter, I'm a
small business person, I own an indoor gun range and training center and down it for the police department eleven years ago
and they encouraged me to open to the public, so I did and also I know how to win because mark in twenty eight clean. I was in the puppet republican District in North Carolina and their people. I see
put me on her list of thirty three members to eliminate and by God's grace and a lot of hard work, we beat Pelosi's hand picked multimillion dollar candidate by six points in this time in the Us Senate. Mark we're going to do it
Chuck Schumer. Now among those you're running against the republican primary is
a very well known, rhino, correct that is correct,
yeah the unreliable conservative is a career politician. He is appointed people a so called moderates that ended up advancing CR t, a critical race theory in our state and a bad judicial or nominations. You know trump knows all of us in this race, but he only endorsed me in that ex governor that you referred to. Mark he's a two time. Loser in this or in this great state of ours, he's lost North Carolina twice and
can't go backwards and we've got a Republican. Now we can't go and or lose it to a Democrat, because now we we needed a seat. We need the seat desperately, and the other thing about this
republican governor he'll. Do exactly with Ms Mcdonald tells me that it will do exactly what the republic in establishing washed and tells him the dinner you ve had the deal with that, and you have fought that and you're part of the Freedom caucus correct. I am absolutely I joined the freedom, carpets and fight and backing twenty seventy
I'm Jim Jordan has come out and endorsed me and supported me and I'll. Tell you. What are people think you go to Washington and there's great dialogue and debate, there's very little discussion, but that's a great group for people have real debates about real policy and they care about the people back home in our districts. So it's been an honor a, and I am still a member of the Freedom caucus
The border, the spending, the bill of rights, all these things had her under attack ice.
when you consider these absolute priorities to deal with, I was down at the border march. Back before thanksgiving of last year, I was riding with border patrol agents that were off duty they slammed on brakes. They said, I'm sorry, I've got to go on duty. They arrested cartel members,
coming across right in front of us, their radios barely reached back over the mountains back to headquarters in her steel laying there that have been laying there since January 20th when Biden took office, there's diesel
structure, equipment to erect a wall that had been laying there sitting there idle since January twentieth of last year, and they came back to the truck after they had arrested these guys and they said the sad thing is they're going to be back in the desert.
Mater Dei or hours and we just need
the that has our back
absolutely I'm with law enforcement, whether it's at the border or whether it's in all thirty, two
at the counties or whether it's our great cities
we have to have a law enforcement back. Can you believe the defunding effort from the Democrats? We have to fight against that. We have to give our law enforcement the tools
support they need, including our moral support and our prayers. What we did meet a club for growth that event
my wife and I met you. We had a good chat. You were very impressive
And who is the candidate for club for growth? Well, that would be
and even though, what the hamper low taxes and for smaller government and Bert growing our economy and, ah, that's why they support me and I'm honored to have theirs
tell if a healthy or not, you got some bigwigs already, but I like to make my own decisions about this and I'm going to.
Horseshoe for the United States Senate
North Carolina and that obviously includes the republican primary. You are, in fact the most concern.
If the person running that's how I judge these things, you're a constitutionalist
So I want to wish you all the best, and I want to just let the people
listening to this problem in North Carolina know that you have my full support, my wife's full support TED. So we wish you all the best mark. This means the world to me. Thank you.
much I'm going to be fighting for our country fighting for north Carolinians and your support means the world to me. So thank you and your wife, both M and Godspeed, to both of you and you to my friend, you take care of yourself wait a minute. Is he still there
yeah, I'm still here, man TED? If people want to help you, where do they go? I apologize. You go to TED Budd, dot com, it's tdd with one day and Bud B. U D d with two d, so TED Budd, dot com, that'll, get you everything you need TED
dot com, the former rhino republican governor, who would be a Mcconnell light in the Senate. We don't need that. Ladies and gentlemen, please we need conservatives.
Carolina we need your help, he's going to need.
raise a lot of money. Cuz he's up
it's a lot of Washington and corporate is money. That's TED T e d, Bud B; U D d, dot, com, tent bud dot com if he can help him
please do and again I endorse him with all. My support will be right back, wait a minute. I've got three minutes. Alright, then, let's move on.
Alright right. There was one other thing I wanted to get here to get to hear Joe Biden announcing
Day that the Russians will use chemical weapons now, this is the thing folks, I dont believe Putin would have used chemical weapons or done any of this.
If Donald Trump were present in the United States, because the last time you use chemic
weapons in Syria. Trump hit their base, hit the rare field and killed up to three hundred Russians. The word.
Deterrent was used, the word escalate was not used, except by the Putin.
of the media in the republican Party. Accept them. But let's take a lesson.
To buy outside the White House today. Go ahead,
I beg you
they're getting a lot of intel inside. In now,
at saying anything that I know for sure so doesn't really matter, but obviously
somebody in and around the Kremlin
that is providing information to surrogates of ours other countries.
And then passing it on to us who has very good information, and so this isn't the first
and Biden has said this or others around him have said this, and so the question is: why
are they telling Russia right now. If you use chemical weapons on the citizens of that country, we will do x.
Why are they drawing a line right now? Why
making it clear to Putin that there is a price to pay for this
that's. What Reagan would do? That's what Trump would do? You can't leave
Ambiguity like this. You've got to take control of the,
call feel rather than surrendering it to the enemy
wouldn't going, gets tough. The tough get my
only now seven
one one, three, eight one one, and once you do this,
the sand remit on Emma sell Us Data Day, the corruption of the media, the degradation of the first amendment they losers, who are dressed up as journalists. It just incredible.
An Android Mitchell is certainly the leader that parade, or certainly one of them, whether Buddy Truck Todd but
I want you to listen to this on MSL
we did Andrea Mitchell go ahead
The warehouses planning college of my colleague drew the aims laid to try to expedite and prioritize activists, people who I didn't if I is actually Bt Q, who would be an end in trouble for
retribution. If Russia were to occupy journalists, family members of Ukrainians, already in the U S
so we're going to prioritize people who identifies algae Lgbtq, and I guess that list is going to grow. When you think MR producer.
If you want to get the hell out there, you say: hey, wait, wait me too, I'm bisexual, I'm a woman whatever that means, I can't define it, how about you prioritize little babies and little kids? How about your prioritize women? How about you prioritize political activists, people who have stood up against the russian regime? How about that? That's just unbelievable! It is unbelievable to me if you asked me today and just how serious, just how serious is the United Nations in our country
about really standing up standing up to these enemies, just how serious what Jennifer Granholm an excellent reported Fox she's at the I e a
Ministerial meeting
sorry Jennifer Granholm, not Jennifer Griffin, who is a lousy good for nothing Energy secretary, I'm stuff in trouble. With this I apologize Jennifer Granholm. Is she serious not really
twenty two to go and have, as evidenced by minister, tailors virtual attended.
today, while he held
Australia respond to yet another devastating
Climate disaster, natural disaster. The climate is not going to wait on our efforts to confront autocrats. Both
Cs need addressing now. What is it amazes me that
people who have a fifth grade. I Q and a third grade knowledge of science keep lecturing all the rest of us about what we have to do and they're making us poor. You feel it they're creating
Can you feel it the destroying our fossil fuel energy? You feel it the Idiot
runs General motors and there have been idiots who run general motors. The ceo. There is now moving his entire fleet over it to electricity. Now the fact is: there's a shortage of nickel, which is critical in these batteries. There's a shortage of other essential materials to make these electric vehicles. They call them ie vs. Now you gotta get with it
we need more ease but he's moving headlong. His ten year plan is now.
Five year plan, just like MAO had
ten year plan or five year plan or whatever it was great leap forward,
General motors might be hitting a wall, but I would ask the CEO of General Motors and I would ask Jennifer Granholm,
Who is a certifiable moron? Where does electricity come from? Where does electricity come from?
is California right now having a problem with energy, including electricity, this California Brown out some blackouts. Yes, it does. They have energy shortages, electricity shortages, look what happened! The Texas, the Republic of Texas, a great conservative state- well, not so much in some respects,
It moved at breakneck speed toward wind, energy and solar energy. Then they got to a freaky blizzard. You know climate change, a freaky blizzard, so they had clouds. They couldn't produce enough energy. Their public utilities are, depending on alternative fuels,.
They can't produce enough energy, you saw what happened to the state. Did you not in the middle of the winter, this freaky blizzard wow
And so now we all have to abandon you see we are have to abandon fossil fuels. I dont want or abandoned fossil fuels. I love them. What happens when there is less and less oil produced which goes into building?
Europe's packaging materials even goes into your automobile, goes into making tires, goes into making virtually everything
an assembly. Why needs or natural gas just gas? All these things in your clothing, polyester is and so forth. You need a legal of shortages, avoid we're gonna dragged down this economy
Why are we listening to these people who have already brought down our economy but Jim
four home. She knows just because we're facing an autocratic tyrant doesn't mean we can't destroy our fossil fuel industry. Maybe we'll keep begging, Venice.
and Saudi Arabia maybe will keep begging our enemies and our adversary, the bed
I have because we all know are american homemade oil creates more pollution than oil from Venezuela and Saudi Arabia to proven fact, it's a proven fact. Now, it's not, of course it's not. These are all stupid people,
These are all central planners. These are all people with political science, degrees or law degrees or whatever other degree. I don't pretend to be
engineer a scientist or anything else, but all these left. This do.
dumber, they are the more expert, they aren't everything caught twenty three, please go.
As Minister Ryan has said, this clean energy transition could be the peace project of our time. They pour every thing they can into their nonsensical positions.
the peace project of our time? You see, ladies and gentlemen, Russia would never want to conquer Ukraine with a former.
Captive nations under the Soviet Union or the former empire under Catherine, the great no, no, no
Why don't they read what I read? Why don't they read what Putan wrote in July this summer? Why don't they look at what he said, because if they look at what he said, they would know that this is not since they don't want to look at what he said. They don't care.
They don't care, but we have so many things confronting our nation today. Don't we mister producer, like this systemic racism,
Country and Kamala Harris's more than happy to tell you all about it, because she's been systemically.
Racially discriminated against. One of the dumbest human beings on the planet is now vice president, the United States. Why? Because of her color
Vacations is one of the dumbest human beings on the planet. You know Willie Brown, who had an affair with her. You remember the former speaker
California Assembly, the former mayor of San Francisco. He warned us.
he warned us in a column that he wrote,
that he couldn't see her in his present the United States,
I vice president, I suppose what a joke she is
just like her boss pine, what a joke. He is too jokes for the price of two jokes.
at twenty four Kamala Harris GO. Appraisals are meant to be fair and objective estimates of the market, value of a property. There's a lot that rides on that estimate of far too often for far too many
people. They are not fair and objective. You know who she sounds like to me now that I think about it. Jake tapper she sound like Jake Tapper to you mister producer. She does to me go ahead test her.
heatedly leash that black homeowners are more likely to have their homes undervalued than other homeowners.
What has repeatedly so that research.
Since its a crime than go after them, maybe they're telling the truth, the appraisers, depending on the community- I don't know they throughout these these these broadsides, it's impossible or no research and thought she was going to say,
Ray economist. You know, research has repeatedly shown black homeowners are more likely to have their homes undervalued than other homeowners. Now a home is valued based on
value on the market on that street, in that neighborhood right, must reducer and they look at like values. How hard can it be.
So if you have people running around who are saying, oh, that homes owned by a black person, so I'm going to devalue it more than that
I easy to find out and easy to punish. What's the
of the speech of the Vice President United States. You know the president. You know the attorney general, what the hell's the problem. What are they
always need an issue of bank people over the head with America can never be anything but systemically racist, no matter how much progress people make no matter how much free
there is no matter how much opportunity there is the greatest nation on the face of the earth. It can never be anything but systemically races, right, Comstock,
I'm cast, an embassy and MSNBC all the way down to the frauds, who are their hosts, there's nothing we can do about it. That's the whole idea of critical rice theory, and I want the parents who rose up in this last.
Election, whether it's Virginia New Jersey or New York or Colorado or Texas, anywhere in the country? I want you to understand something when the Democrats had an opportunity to
take a stand against critical race theory: pull back to take a stand against this transgender movement, the movement or less poor, back
They nominate nominated somebody to the Supreme Court who embraces them both, and that means no matter what you
at the local level, no matter what kind of activists you are organized, you are no matter if you change your local school board. One day, these
the shoes will come before that court and voting will be brown Jackson. I believe. That's it. Yeah good, tangy Brown Jackson could tangy Brown Jackson and shall be voting against. All of your parents shall be voting against opposition to critical race theory shall be voting against the indoctrination of your children, the age of four five, six, seven years old on transgender ism and other aspects of sex or genitalia or lack of genitalia, and the falls at Disney.
are still complaining, still threatening still going to strike because of the don't say, gay law that was passed and far too. The only problem is a dont say. Gay law was never passed in Florida. It sir, keep your hands off my little babies law do not indoctrinate them about sex, do not promote among them trains. Gender is, do not keep secret from parents who pay the bills, whether they be Democrat Republican, whether they be people of faith or not. What your teaching their children,
It's a don't say gay bill. That's a get out of my face bill, I'll be right, back was love him and the show go seems like it went very very quickly to me, but then again I'm the host, but sometimes even for the hosts. They can go slowly, but I feel this one went very quickly. You know people think I'm like, given a heads up about what I'm going to discuss on Hannity or something like that, I'm not
I'm not your also noticed many hosts need their monitors. Why did they need? Monitors must produce.
Because that's right there, monologues or put him a monarch, wouldn't even call those things I forget.
at proctors, see only remember what they're called folks. I've never used a teleprompter in my life.
Otherwise, you would see me reading on the board going back and forth plus with this. I I'd probably get a word here and there wrong.
So when you see me on life, Liberty and Levin on Sunday, what you see is what you get as they say. I speak what I'm thinking right. So it's
the cough, but it's, but it's it's reasoned out. It's something I've been thinking about before I get to the studio. It's something I've been thinking about the night before so that's how
Do it and I'll be on Hannity in thirty minutes, I hope you'll join us
We salute our armed forces, police officers, firefighters, emergency personnel.
All of our trucker friends in our freedom fighter, friends in Ukraine,
God bless. You all see you tomorrow,
take care.
I.
Transcript generated on 2022-03-26.