It's quiet in the underground bunker doors closed blocks bolted. What the great one isn't just resting on our laurels. He's king sure you'll weekend is even better by giving you is best. This is the best more club in this espionage act of nineteen. Seventeen Was later amended, you know espionage and sedition, you hear these phrases throne or in the description of donald trump espionage, sedition. Espionage and sedition are intended for people who act in trees this way spies people who take our topsy it sink with them to the enemy s being.

Spies for the enemy. sedition who have as their purpose, to undermine the car. The commission and the role of a lan- none of that applies to donald trump, of course, but they keep throwing these phrases around. You can read the Espionage, active nineteen, seventeen as amended right there on the internet. This law has never been apply to a president or former president. Why is there anybody know? Because it can't be at least to forestall a constitutional republic of which there are serious questions by me. the espionage, the first sentence, as I said last night on fox the first sentence of article two

section one and article two is what creates the executive branch and the office of the presidency. The very first sentence, basically, is the sentence that provides that the president is the executive branch. Now the left hates to hear theirs, particularly their profit. Sorry, it doesn't mean he's a dictator. He just is in charge of one of the branches of government and they wanted one person. in charge, and then their separation of powers, and it is generally understood or used to be that you cannot pass a statute that diminishes Diminishes one branch or another or alters the constitution in any significant way, let alone and. Stick a regulation at the department of justice or anywhere else.

A regulation is the lowest lowest of so called requirements. Then comes the statutes, but the law, the line is the constitution when this law was passed and nineteen seventeen who's never intended to apply to a president or even a former president. War war wanted started in one of the worst president's in american history. Who was and out of the closet, racist and segregationist woodrow wilson, long time. Democrats so called progressive. and one of the early intellectuals of the so called progressive movement by the way he put this in place as a Broader part of other rules said he put in place. For instance, he set up.

An entire propaganda network and entire propaganda network, where he would threaten newspapers he would threaten newspapers. If they would dare to challenge his views on war, a war one, he used the espionage act to political opponents. Imprison. One of them was eugene depths by eugene. Debs was a fine at time, socialist party of america presidential candidate, it was very critical of our environment war war one he spoke, ohio and urged young men to resist the draft, so he arrested and charged with ted counts of sedition. Any

found guilty on all counts and he was sentenced to ten years in prison and he couldn't vote for the rest of his life. I appeal to the us supreme court: in the: u s supreme court in shank, verses united states unanimously ruled against them. They said that speech could put Chile undermine society that government particularly going, War so wasn't protected under the first man. By the way, you know who committed his sentence to time served a republican pressure. Banana worn g, Harding. yes being jack. Was used for such vile com, Doctors, julius and Ethel Rosenberg there were spying for communist soviet union and they go

leave the soviet union top secret nuclear weapon designs. They were spies. As well as information on jet engines and radar and sonar long trial. They were convicted, Down the espionage act of nineteen, seventy daniel ellsberg. He was charged with violations of the espionage act over the pentagon papers, but a judge dismissed all the charges against them Because the government had illegally collected and handle the evidence. Chelsea manning form, a: u s: army private. What's he called himself now Elizabeth manning or whatever it is. He had faced twenty charges colluding aiding the enemy.

The most serious sentence would have been a death penalty. He was convicted on twenty one charges. But he was acquitted in terms of aiding the enemy and he was sentenced to Thirty, five years maximum security, Barack Obama, commuted his her sentence, So they nearly seven years he she had served edward Snowden. charged under the espionage by the way more people been charged only espionage act since woodrow wilson, by modern times by Barack obama than any modern president's than any modern presidents.

So if you were to look at this espionage acting, you look at the history of it. It little has nothing to do with what is being done to donald trump and its also unconstitutional, as it applies to donald trump, I've been the first to say this. I think I have to write in indonesia, national review mister producer. What do you think we were First, to talk about how this was used as a subterfuge four january six and broader investigation, it was when the second our on monday, when we first heard of this news. And last night on life, liberty, Levine and I'll, do it again on radio? I pointed out that, as applies to the present the united states, the espionage act is unconstitutional, and why is that.

Why is the espionage act, as applies to the president, that is tromp unconstitutional anybody? Now, let's go back to article two section, one, the first sentence and its generally understood that the press in the united states has absolute ultimate authority to classify declassify every once so prior to his leaving office, makes a determination that he is going to take classified information with him. Nothing can stop him.

The espionage act of nineteen seventeen can't stop him. If you have the power to make classifications and unmake classifications, then you have the power to We document whether it's classified or not as president of the united states, will mark what about the presidential, presidential papers act or whatever they choose to call. It was passed in nineteen. Seventy eight do any of you collected all presidential signatures and documents and so forth you see prior to nineteen. Seventy eight most of these things, Belonged the president who left office: that's why you're get certificate It signed Abraham lincoln and I had

possession a one time and gave it to the hills del college of they first appointment. But the first associate justice to the supreme court. It was in private hands, I purchase, didn't gave it to him still kullak And on and on not so was until nineteen seventy eight till this law was passed it to the administrative law. It's not a criminal law to administrative law, but that law does not tromp the constitution any more than the espionage act. Trumps. The constitution. I would argue that, as applies to a president, it too is unconstitutional the press, makes a determination that he is going to take the documents with him. People will say, but the government produced it. That's fine,

as it applies to everybody else in the government, but not to the president, he's the one to which article two section, one first sentence supplies he's the one. And nobody else, equality under the law when it comes to donald trump, is equal treatment as a president and former president under the law, not as Ernie Grabowski handling the friar mcdonald. The case of Hillary Clinton is so compelling because she never was president. She was nothing more than the captain secretary article two does not apply to her she's a subordinate in the executive branch under the unitary executive, which is under the president. It doesn't apply to her or any

The board, that is, the powers that are given to the president of the united states upon his election and the extent the espionage act for some paper. Pusher act attempts to diminish or reduce the sir a power that a president has their unconstitutional? You one? change your men, the constitution, that's what you're supposed to do now, of course, As I explained this to you, we have radical judges throughout the district of columbia, thanks to Obama Biden with a few tromp judges, did not appear to be all that sharp at the district court level. I believe if we have supreme court justices that understand what I say if they have been so thorough, intimidated by the dobbs decision. The espionage act to me as it was originally planned.

Was unconstitutional anyway, it certainly unconstitutional as applied to a prison, the united states. That's why it's not been applied to a president of the united states. That's why Turning general and a. U s: attorney had never attempted to apply against a president of the united. states? They have no idea if, as I speak, Barack obama documents with them, let alone classified documents. How would they know unless they issue subpoena to search his five mansions, they have no idea of george w bush has classified Information down there and why go our wacko taxes? They have no idea, they have no idea. A bill. Clinton has classified documents as I speak, They have no idea. Dick Cheney has that they have no idea. If vice president Biden took any none, because they ve never locked

They ve never locked. How are they now. Mark. You yourself said they a batch numbers and track, but apparently not its nineteen months to figure out that door tromp had mature related to nuclear weapons, which of course, is alive and I'm just playing at nineteen months. Some urgency. So I want to encourage those listening yes, espionage act of nineteen. Seventeen cannot be applied against state president, but what about a former president? He didn't take the documents. As a former president, he took Mr President,

in an economy like this. We all need as much help as we can get whether you're an employee or employer you're. Just looking for ways to survive, so innovation refunds can help small business owners. Listen up. You could be eligible to receive a payroll tax rebate of up to twenty six thousand dollars per employ. This isn't alone. There is no payback it's a refund of your taxes, go to get refunds, dot com, their tax. Attorneys are specialists in this little known, payroll tax reform programme. I do all the work with no charge up front. They simply charge a percentage of the cash that they get for you, businesses of all types can qualify as long as you have five or more employees. The team may get refunds, dot, com. As already returned over one billion dollars to businesses, and they can help you to seriously gotta Refunds, dotcom click on qualify me an answer. A few questions: gotta get refunds, calm, no risk high reward. That's get real funds that com,

The make it your weekend even better. This is the best of mark levin. Let's read part of this together, showing I think we shall attachment, be property to be seized, all physical documents and records constituting evidence contraband fruits of crime or other items illegally possessed and violation of eight. U s! Seven! Ninety three! She espionage jack, twenty. Seventy one records, production or fifteen nineteen obstruction, including the following. A any physical documents were classification Markings along with any containers boxes, including any other contents in which such documents are located,

as well as any other containers boxes, utter collectively, stored or found together with the aforementioned documents and container boxes, be information Including communications in any form regarding the retrieval, storage or transmission of national defence information are classified material, see any government and or prison presidential records created between january twenty. Twenty seventeen. In january, twenty twenty twenty one d, any evidence of knowing alteration to structure can the amount of any government and our presidential records or of any documents, but classification market.

Now, there's a lot to unload here, but let me unload what really matters any this: a see any government and or presidential records created between January twenty twenty seventeen in january, twenty twenty one that would be drawing president trumps term in office or a let's talk about the fourteenth them. What does excuse me? The fourth amendment, one. Fourth, amendments say party your bill of rights, the right of the people but be secure in their persons, houses papers and effects. Against unreasonable searches and caesar seizure shall not be violated, And no warrants shall issue but upon probable cause

supported by oser affirmation that set affidavit here we go and protect Whaley describing the place to be surge in the persons or things to be seized, chick lily, describing the place to be searched in the persons or things to be seized and government an oar presidential records created between January twenty twenty seventeen in january twenty on twenty one are, obviously you can't know in advance. Can you give such documents exist, but if exist everywhere in somebody's house everywhere. What they search. Why did, in my view, violated the fourth amendment? Is a cave unconstitutional power, a grant of power

To the fbi and prosecutors, who have a head on four trunk to go into his home in search everything, we're not even try king here about the plain view doctrine which I talk about last week. Nothing to do with that. This warrant authorizes this kind of research. By this master, though, signed by a master, not a federal judge. Any government, an oar presidential records created between January twenty twenty seventeen january, twenty twenty one. You can search for them and sees them. Perhaps that explains why they went into maloney trumps, close closet. Because see at of aid C and d- and I would argue others, but let's stay focused on sea vial-

it's the particularity requirement of the fourth amendment. One more time. particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized. Why do we have a fourth mammoth Cause several states demanded it built without before they would vote on the constitution that was adopted in philadelphia. They didn't call at the fourth amendment, but there were very concerned about What recalled general warrants are writs of assistance. The british would abuse the colonists I, printing these general warrants, which became known as writs, of assistance in which the monarchy would grant soldiers these broad powers to search.

The homes that businesses the persons, the papers of the colonists. So they could search virtually any home they liked at any time they like for any reason they like or no Is it at all was happening, obviously, as they wanted to see who was joining this resistance, Then rebel revolution, so the framers of the bill of rights, which came after the constitution considered this to be unreasonable course. They were right course arrived So that the governments have a valid interests, such as public safety, which is a key one,. In searching through maloney closet in searching The entirety virtually of a living quarters.

Admiral argo of the trunk family public. safety issue were concerned about a potential crime apart from maintaining documents, apart from maintaining documents, which is why everybody's at first scratch their heads, it's? U dont a search warrant for Threatening the presently united states an unprecedented act because of documents because of documents. The presumption is even the supreme. Rolled a nineteen eighty under patent verses, new york. They search without a warrant is presumed to be unreasonable. Some cases they can be reasonable. For a number of reasons. I don't need to get into here, but there are. So cases where search warrants sir issued that our unreasonable, for instance, if they grant weight to bear,

The authority and undermine the entire purpose of a judge ordered, and, judge overseen search worn in the first place, so not only Is the espionage not a justification, in my view, because of the unconstitutional supply doyle, even president, By the way, the argument the present in his lorries make as they already declassified them. Want to get into that in a sort of a footnote point. But here I argue, these search warrant was simply way too broad. The judge this master author, As far too, of an ambiguous and generalized search parameters, it doesn't fix it by saying Oh by the way, I look for classified information and, of course they need There is classified information they ve been in there two months earlier and they didn't take it.

So there was no urgent. There really was. And so the privacy and the property was violated. By the government, in violation of the fourth amendment. In addition, we learn more today. Of course, the justice. And opposes the release of the underlying half david say there, it would serve as a road map to the governments of stagnation, provide specific details about its direction, unlikely course in a manner that is highly likely to compromise future investigative steps. Talking about a future president have no ideal. why they would have to say this. but the present in the united states waded out. Oh great. His bit adjust been learned that the ep behind its now,

famous rate omar larga, took boxes. I'd privileged attorney, climb material Also exclusive privileged matter Which they knowingly should not have taken by copy of this truth, I respectfully request These documents be immediately return and location from which they were taken. Thank you. I heard one- legal analyse say that there can at the set up what they call, like it or not, a chinese wall within the department of justice. Where there are certain lawyers, Who will be on the other side of the wall, the independently view the documents to make a determination of whether their applicable edna. That might be fine when you're dealing with. Discovery matters.

italy when you're dealing with discover requests involving the department of justice where it needs to make such decisions over, but when you are dealing with a search warrant in doc In some boxes has already been taken, you can make the presumption that it any climb privileges already been pierced because, at least theoretically of I don't believe that this, but even according to parts of the wind at lease. Theoretically there looking through the boxes right there, there nine and a half hours. How can you prove a negative if you're, the defence. so the presumption is, they violated, attorney, climb, privilege and the debate justice doesn't get to decide whether they did or not. A court has decide whether they did or not. So there is far more.

boy as a result of the way the department of justice conducted itself. Let people make it seem yes attorney. Client pretty It does actually apply to donald trump, even though I know they keeps meaning his lawyers are getting warrants and taking their documents and saying, there's the crime from exception and they make these these assertions and just start grab and all the documents you wouldn't want that to happen to you. What would you. President, a chance them the return, I don't believe they ve got an answer. President also points out in another tweet in the radio The fbi, they stole my three passports. One expired along

Everything else this is an assault on a political opponent at eleven ever seen before in our country third world. Why don't they return them? Where are these boxes whose Charge them this court overseer. Has the court done anything about the attorney general? He concerned about the constitution is concerned about a turning point. Privilege he's not supposed to do that: eddie work, the bad administration of the democratic party. Would it be the hatchet man for who s attorney hatchet. There are supposed to be a lot of protection in place on the criminal side.

So once again it's my contention that the espionage active nineteen. Seventeen cannot apply to a president and a year's president at the time that it takes the documents and leaves office. That's one number to the sack was never intended to apply to ex expressly under any circumstance. That's why it's never been applied, and we have no idea of the living ex presidents, what they have in their homes and in their offices the living vice premier it's what they have in their homes and offices. Neither does national archives they can assert while they follow the rules. Doesn't mean they no other their files in their homes? businesses of these individuals there are the five just idea: none.

Number three: the search warrant in my view, was way too broad and therefore defective under the fourth amendment and unconstitutional way too broad. mark you, wanna sitting to the best of mark laverne, so Joe Biden signed his putrid law that he's been pushing fifty one to fit de in the senate to honour and twenty two and seventeen in the house. Let there be no mistake that every democratic voted for it ever Republican voted against. This is a mass of spending bill, destroying our energy independence, further destroying our fossil fuel industry

their subsidizing, billionaires and millionaires and corporations, while they pretend that they care about the little guy, the inflation reduction act. Has nothing to do with reducing inflation another lie and other distortion and. Version of the english language we reached a point in this country is not new, but it's gotten ridiculous. were passing laws that fundamentally alter the relationship between the individual citizen and their government. in a way. In a way that is detrimental to the individual citizen and empowers the government is celebrated. Please consider progress. Fundamentally altering their country. That's an achievement.

attacking our economic system, attacking the fossil fuel system, attacking our drug industry, attacking our maybe formula industry, our meat processing industry. attacking our sovereignty by refusing to secure the borders, our constitutional system, separation of powers, the supreme court supreme court justices. This is prague ass, a boarding more babies in aborting them on demand and aborting them, even though the science says there actually human beings that progress It's a civil right. and that's where we are Joe Biden now going to travel. A country talking about the republicans who voted against this monstrosity are actually for the special interests

the one subsidize the oligarchs, big tech. In silicon valley he's the one advising the teachers unions against the parents and children he's on subsidizing these massive nonprofit democrat slash marxist organization, to bring endless lawsuits. He's. The one subsidizing illegal immigration. he's the one subsidizing communist china. By forcing you to purchase electric vehicles have batteries I require call both seventy percent of which is produced in congo. One hundred of that seventy percent. One hundred percent control by the Democrats excuse my yes communist chinese dammit.

that's. What's the difference time to celebrate, progress he's been dying to sign this thing. The stupidest. And ever serve in the senate. The stupidest man ruby vice president and others still this man to ever. Be president His hand around the throat of the golden goose. When things go south, when they go sour, he blames putin, big oil, big capitalism, but when things seem to going going better by his view, he takes all the credit. His plan did this and what is his plan to spend and choose me to spend and borrow and tax like a drunken

That's what he does. Penny expects you to vote for him involve first party. Because he's for the little guy can't you tell you ve been Us restore lay he's what a little guy you have a baby there This formula he's Little guy, when you go Your school board, one school, starts again suggested for many. I knew you dare to speak out his attorney general target. You with the fbi. Little guy, don't you know little guy the middle class hardworking americans, which is why too million illegal aliens are going to cross the border this year alone for the little guy. Twice gonna unleash eighty seven thousand, no irish agents against you. Then I needed first.

hundred billion airs. Needed for yo worthy Hanging fruit and he intends to pick it small businesses, middle class americans. The overwhelming majority of orders had been done against you in the first place you think they're going to stop and what about inflation? Not only does this thing not. Address inflation in any positive way. It adds to it in the last. Thirty two, forty days, the Democrats in congress have spent another trillion dollars. Another trillion dollars, you don't think that's gonna catch up with the economy. you think the economy can be legislated away,

Pass a law that fixes things they pass laws and destroy. things is a reason why the constitution places limits on the federal government and on each branch of the our government there's a reason why I say we live in a post, constitutional america. What kind of commerce has the power. To manipulate our lives, this way a bureaucracy, a president To manipulate our lives this way, the question: is and what are the limits on government? The question today is what aren't the limits, their involved and everything: employment, unemployment, pensions, food.

Ere, the water. What goes in your house? What goes on your house, where you can build your house are there now engineered your truck your boat? What else everything there either. Stickers on your washing machine. Your drier, your washer government, approved your life, all your ladders. The tires on your car, the engine in your car, the parts to your car, the paint, the roofing, the government. What goes into your car in terms of gasoline, whether it has ethanol or not? Oh, yes, everything everywhere. One

Government is the biggest landholder, it's the biggest lisa, it's the biggest insure its the biggest employer. The biggest employee Scott, more weapons in the private sector. The government is massive. What is the government involved? Oh yes, and it's all good or righteous, also the positive have they control. The people have taken All these private companies have that the control entrepreneurs have that control thought happened. Controlled discussions have been controlled. Competition.

Forget everything in any one out of the way of the government's mission, another omnibus bill with ominous: how comes more spending more borrowing, more, Or mass of interests, more redistribution of wealth. more war on one part of the private sector or another. I people for the most part who ve never worked in the private sector or never succeeded in the private sector. But they wish to control it. And yet, if we had to rely on the government for water, we would die.

We had to rely on a government for food. We would starve to death. Had to rely on the government for housing. We'd freeze to death in the winner. we had to rely on the government for our sustenance. There would be no sustenance. We are now the servants of the government. There are no our governments servants we're the servants of the government, that's where we are. I now law enforcement is being used law. for some. It is being used to. Forced the will of the ruling class Polar actually started to ask questions now about this warrant that was used against president Tromp was a too broad

say I wonder where they heard that or that Grabbing of all the documents and so forth, at a moral largo? She was to be unconstitutional, you dont, say, or that, of course no precedent ever been charge for violating the espionage rack. We'd never gone here before. This raises serious constitutional questions, We, what did you hear that before? What did you hear that before I went January six supposed be the worst day in America? Now it's not the worst diana mark. That's right the words the line between How'd you get election, whether you choose different electors will erase cos Since in georgia, whether you

courage, a sector of state to make recounts between politics and criminality we ve, done this before? It's all brand? No! U s attorney. Biden, appointee attorney general bognor, pointy, deputy attorney general Biden, appointee associate attorney general Biden, appointee headed the criminal division Biden, appoint. De in a land, a Democrat, Any genuine albany democrat D six committee, Nancy Pelosi, Democrat better committee, the democratic party, hates america. That's why bills like this this on the bus ominous bill? his push through in a week the ten days time before the people can tell

representatives what they think about. Try the borders open. No, the people don't want the border rope, it doesn't matter what the people want. It's a farce. Mark. The great one makes your weekend even that here this is the best of mark le then. Centre for disease control has received blistering blistering report about its conduct since. In a we had the virus and so forth, trying to pull this up for you, and. I want to remind you.

So nursing homes situation that we were the first. to talk about this when we were tipped off on the air by a doctor, It was an administrator nursing and I would go through the stance that were provided by the cdc, and I will tell you that the definition of just cold this confusing? It seems overly broad that thee. reckon I was being given was contradictory. I had people on my show life labour. Levin people behind this mike and if where I was attacked as it denier who said denier of war. I do not deny there's a virus Worse, I didn't deny that there is a virus

There were a lot of questions to be asked and the cdc was not up to it. One of the reasons is because a polluted Safe, which is not a top subject of this report, Because they would respond to democratic interest groups like the teachers union. Which really wasn't part of the report either and, of course, We have found she who said tat where. Asks and then wear masks where boots were burgers were goggles double mask. And nobody serious was buying any that, except, of course, the media pushing the agenda. and now the cdc director will linsky she amidst the cdc did not reliably meet expectations on covert. Ninety.

They had had a review of its structure, systems and processes that are going to have a shake up. The head of the centers for disease control and prevention. Today,. the agency, fell, short of expectations The corona virus pandemic, announced drastic changes for its operations, but Lansky said For seventy five years, cdc and public health have been preparing for cover. Nineteen in our big moment are performed. did not reliably meet expectations and a court Found she's one of the reasons and, of course his hand should be kicked out and kicked out fast. My goal is a new public health action, oriented cultured cdc than emphasizes accountability. Collaboration committee Asian and timeliness notice should, Some say eliminates politics,

the agency enable announced a review of its structure. Systems are processes, and the review came after criticism. The agency was slowed, alter covered nineteen guidance in the face of changing science often produce confused Recommendations are difficult for the public to decipher. Changes would also include the appointment of mary wakeful of former obama administration health official delete. the agency's move towards stronger public health focus additionally The cdc will strengthen the response team for health emergencies. New york times The other things I want to look at is diversity at the highest level. So let me tell you this: you ready, I think, a lot of this. The response is the opposite of what you. A normal, regular american would think

We're gonna get more of the world politics in this department, this agency, more of it not less. That they're gonna remain political when they talk about communications and so forth. Neither bringing in an obama flak as if that's going to clean up anything as we know it won't clean up anyway,. I am old and apology. Many people around an apology. I don't expect one, I'm just underscoring the point and of course there are fantastic: fantastic experts, yale stanford, oxford, yeah, rockefeller college, so many in so many other mrs, is out front and knew exactly what needed to be done.

we're not only ignored in many cases they were derided and, of course, big taken the oligarchs they rejected any contrary opinions even from experts and scientists and medical doctors. They banned them. They ban them, they gave the scarlet letter. And now we know also that the cdc work and the white I work with these big oligarchs from well, who now have received fifty billion dollars or so from you and me. In order to silence contrary voice. And that's the problem you see, ladies and gentlemen, the more centralized the government gets, the more ideological and the more it is invested in port its agenda, no matter what that's the problem,

centralized healthcare decisions, that's the problem, centralized environs decisions. That's the problem of centralized economic decisions. You know stolen yes, stolen stolen, his people were starving, the russians were starving to death. But he was not going to give up the communes, we're not gonna. Up his massive stealing private property, the organization of agriculture, and so he and people put out lies about production, lies and when they would meet their goals, he would have them in charge of the processes executed because

Wasn't bialik ideology, you see it was the people because they can never give up the ideology till they have it's. The ideology. See CDC admits had failed to respond effectively to the covert crisis. Leaping reorganization indeed changing the agency's culture and restoring public trust and to make the agency more nimble them. Just what they say it admits covered nineteen response, and it says its It out a plan to become more nimble unaccountable. I don't think so. Bringing their obama again. If you're talking about workers and effectively none of that an improved science, none of its can improve the management of the organization you see.

The the cdc like eighty chairs, like all the rest of the alphabet,. Has enormous red tape. layers layers of long and the tooth bureaucrats star, was found, she among others and they're not talking about the kind of changes that are needed to truly fix. Market, oriented competition, taking more Vice from serious outside scientists and medical doctors I even acknowledge loan apologize further work with the big oligarchs, some big tech. Its people actually know what you're talking about. Now. Why are they coming out now in doing this? Why? Because they

believe the republicans will take the house when they take the house, they will have to testify and there will be investigations and they're going to point to this great report that they've done And how they responded to it that we're going to make changes, we're going to do much better we're going to be responsive to the public. We're going to we're going to consider. This one in that one. We know we have a problem, so this is a preventative effort to take some of the heat. god willing, when the republicans take the house, because they have said that this will be one of their top issues. So they want to come in and diffuse. The whole thing We, you know we worked on this and we we agree and we have a problem and we're we're really working on changing the bureaucracy and the response and and and we don't

disagree and Barbara nominal? They need to be held to account. this overhaul they're talking about major overhaul. Why do you think they're making such a big deal of it? the we're giving you nothing, but the best. The best of mark le then ran Paul on the fbi let's listen and cut to go where you know. I think the burden is on the f b I to justify this raid. This is extraordinary. This is also the same f b. I that used a foreign intelligence warrant to snoop on and spy on the trump campaign to investigate them for over two years. So I The burden really is on. The fbi had been wrong in the past broken the law in using these foreign intelligence warrants. Now there domestic warrant, but I do. they need to release the justification for this, because this is

ordinary and we should not lose sight of the fact. This is never ever happened before for good reason, because we need to have confidence in the fbi. We need to have confidence. our intelligence agencies that are there Let us not to go after people for peace, Well purposes, so the burdens is on them to prove that this is not a politically motivated which aren't. as I listened to Senator Paul. My think about these things. Where exactly is the department of justice going with us? A ladies and gentlemen follow me on this one: are they going they covered up for?

hunter Biden. They refused to investigate all the connections between Joe Biden and his paymasters in communist china and elsewhere. They refuse to go after a secretary of state former sector stay for her violations of the sba measure, act and subordinate to the president can be charged for violations of the esplanade jack They refused to go after former fbi director, actually leaked government information to the new york times and took a bunch of at home where exactly the going with this. If these democratic prosecutors have their way they're going to indict two former president non state.

The I want you to let that really settle in. I want you to digest that if they have their way, they're going to and indict a former president of the united states and, quite frankly, very likely a future candidate for president of the united states. For what. If you look at these statutes, I've studied them. I know them the espionage act. No, you have to turn that statute inside out to charge a president. former president was violating that statue and yet it peers. They may be willing to do exactly that.

For insurrection, obstructing an election and more because he. he wants to try and challenged the election in different states he's encouraging them to send under electors he once fraud or is believed to be fraud, to be investigated, they're calling structured in an effort to stay in office. You can indict a former president for that for that.

Now I understand the self righteousness of the trumpeters, whether they be in the department of justice, the? U S, office, the fbi, And the democratic party generally in the white house, obviously Mitch Mcconnell once Donald trump taken down its clear because he so effective that may become, but this is where we're going and I'll have a trial.

The trial in Washington dc before one of these judges like jackson, that's what we're gonna do I'll have the country looks and absolute stunned, shock and amazement. what's happening to our country, and then we are admonished by so called republican leaders, not criticise. Don't raise your voice, let the process player. The process play out each played out. Why do prosecutors issues search once. because they are looking for information

Information to do what to bring charges against somebody with its general six or the yes, but whatever it is. That's why this is so unconscionable and shocking and then. Thanks to the new york slime, said the watchman compost to news week to see and to others they don't add up. This is a massive ongoing Multi headed investigation for anything anything I can find anything They will use local prosecutors And had a ladder, they will you stay prosecutors in albany, they will use federal prosecutors and wash Do you see and south florida

they will use a committee of congress to do their dirty work. They will do whatever they have to do. they have now criminalize the leader of the republican party effectively, that's what they ve done. The ruling class, the democratic party, the match, Mcconnell Republicans there, never trappers, the moderates, who are phony so called conservative, columnists the breadth and width of what's taking place in stunning. Absolutely stunning.

I mean they been exposed for what they did in the twenty sixteen election. In early on in the trunk presidency, they ve been exposed. The fbi no, not just senior levels, but even mid level. Lawyers that the fbi they better expose. Replanting evidence that dossier I'll be here. For the Democrats, they been exposed for changing documents presented two courts, baited exposed for leaking committing families.

we urge reporters get pulitzer prize and then it turns out these are lies and they keep their pillar surprises and where's george bush, dick cheney and his daughter, their part of the ruling class they're. Fine with this truth is the most dangerous man in history. Oh yes, storing is four years a president.

He violated the constitution? He rounded up people, he executed people. He said the military have! No, he didn't do any of those we have for years of experience with donald trump. He followed. The law, unlike Joe Biden, refuses to institute the existing immigration laws and is destroyed title mine for women, and is destroyed so many things, but don't worry jos on our role. Man he's been successful, step back and look at the big picture. This is the party that wants to destroy the independence of our court system. This is the party that sends its thugs and its militia out to harass the constitution. On the court and fraud in the phoney, who sits in the attorney general's office, has no interest

charging. Anybody with a violation of federal law would only mean a search warrant. Just look at that there they are arrest them now. We want why he won't say he won't say. This is the attorney general sits on his thumb when our board, being overrun with criminals and fed now people are dying in the streets from this drug. He does nothing to secure the border he's for law enforcement. Don't you know nothing. Their murder right going through the roof prime through the roof, but don't worry mega trap in their sights. America, don't worry, the republic and later in the senate on their side. He speaks very loudly by his silence.

His silence is deafening definite, so you see this. I see this. That's why, when we see editorials and papers like the washington examiner the new york post, we go. What are they living in the same world as we are? What and then we sit there and say why donald trump drink, his tea, properly pinky in the air. What does any properly take his cloth, napkin and chuck it into his collar? He fights back. Tens of millions of us have wanted a fighter who fights

If he fights back, then people sire. If we want this drama, I dunno I mean the guy. He tweets, he fights he Jessie J Kenny, let it go. What do you think they'll do this at the santas they've already started with the set you'd think the local Democrat DA's in florida or if they get a democrat attorney general one day, are going to lay off the santas. Now they're not going to lay off the set and they're not going to lay off trump and just look at what we talk about now. Every day they drive this agenda

They drive this agenda and notice that Joe Biden he's above it all. He doesn't even know about it. We're supposed to believe he doesn't know, know how Joe now it has no about that. He doesn't know what his son stirring, o crooked has no idea just because you, MR ten percent and the big guy, just because He is multi million dollar imagines after spending a lifetime, in the same way, no problem, no problem at all. It's joe bother, Joe. Picking up other hunter, I mean we may have to acknowledge kids, a crook, coquette and all the rest, but you know.

off his family with the only family we attack is the trump family. This is a big deal. This is a big deal and I know this government control by the Democrats. I know this government its. Oh, my god, it's him, Instinct, I know they're listen under their show. I know they're watching my social media I know, they've stolen some of my email. Oh yes, I know this is what we're dealing with now.

And now they're going to have eighty seven thousand more individuals to monitor your bank accounts, the checks. You write, the deposit you make to see how you conduct yourself business or as an employee. Now the surveillance state feels like it doesn't many ways and china doesn't it here. We are massive debt, massive inflation people are suffering and the government creates positions where eighty seven thousand more.

arrest agents, always enough money for their. I sure hope people understand what's going on in this country. So let me ask you a question where the democratic party is ruling, but do we have, but we have to, we have safety? Do we have health care? Do we have functioning schools? Do we have functioning public transportation to have clean streets? I'm hoping enough democrats or listening to me who live in these areas are not turn about party apparatchiks. You know little commies, urban,

Do step around and make their money off the backs of the people of a particular city. I'm saying look at all these cities. Now one democrat cities functioning in a humane and civil way, not one. now one of them has a functioning police force, because how the politicians have destroyed them, not one has safe streets now, one, not one has good schools, not one. Not one is clean streets, not one. That's the democratic party and then, when you look at the national level they project what you ve done in the cities to what they were due to the knave impoverish the people, the people, to work for the government rather than the other way around put. Here in the people with a now mass of power

For irish and so forth,.