They won't. You know I have an obligation to come on the air with data immaterial and research. I can't you say: trade stinks thanks for children in the dim, Bunge Notion alleged jump right in because we have no time for nonsense, ready to hear the truth about America. When I was a young man, I don't remember it being sexy to want to allow a nanny state to control my life on a showed its not immune to the banks with your host bomb Jean. I want the renegade Republican Damp on GINO Briefly Joe. How are you- and you are well glad to be here with a start? new neighbour facebook live in today's podcast as well episode, five, twenty so always the verge of breaking through new technological barriers, except for the fact that Facebook book Lesbian up for a while gosh. That's it

about yesterday. You know what the media coverage you would think. We were on the verge of nuclear installation and, yes, you have been about Bobby Seale out laughing it what's going on, issues are every bit. Let's take a deep breath, about this entire situation in north Koreans. We ve had an idea about their nuclear capabilities for a really long time. You're gonna get into that couple really. Goods long stories. I read today, one in the Wall Street Journal about a bit of a mess did make approach. We're we're taken right now want to discuss that too, but there, let's stay great international brought. You buy a buddies, a brick house nutrition, it over big fan these guys miles and Adam they been with me from the beginning, their young there hungry there always looking for products out there on the edge they're gonna make your performance Improve your lies, one of the products they have that I really like is done to task super busy life. As many of you do, I'm thankfully it doesn't a lot of manual labor any more, but it is still pay Bessie. I gotta be my game all the time daunted dusk,

energy product, they sell, won't give you these ups and downs from these energy drinks and coffee. We gotta have you no sixty cups of coffee a day and a new crash to really great product. It's called again Don T dusk. I get back on this Daniel at bonds. You know that com is email all the time. People love it from pilot military guys, cross bidders working parents p allowed there on the assembly line Pasadena their butts. All thanks for what you do Don t dusk and give you nice, ten, our boosting energy, no ups and downs go give it a shot, go to brick house nutrition, dot com, Slash Dan, that's brick, house, nutrition, dotcom, slash the and pick up a bottle. Don T does today on the North Korea thing there's a couple interesting angles. I wanted to take on this. I just what I dont want to do. Is I don't want a harp on coverage you ve already seen. Yesterday it's been a toy before our new cycle, about North Korea and to those you miss they had been or something they get emails. I say: don't die right to the story. I didn't see it. Ok, some of you may have. You were busy lies apparently the Washington Post broke.

Story that the North Koreans are now able to miniaturized a nuclear weapon to fit on top of an icy began, a delivery vehicle and entire continental ballistic missile, which would deliver the debt that weapon to the United States can hit. Hawaii can hit the continental united. So you know, obviously that's a major development. A major breakthrough in- and rightfully so was you know, was the subject of again nearly twenty four hours now of consistent news coverage. Now not retread all that stuff. There's a couple points I wanted they hit on this in the first one is a friend of mine, I'm George rashly rights. It conservative h Q brought up a fastened point the Joe you and I have discussed before you remember I'm a go when I brought and rashly wrote this in the past, where he said that one of the lessons folks, one of the lessons of foreign adversaries and frankly allies who just picked up strategic lessons from the initial go Gulf. One of the lessons they learned about the United States was now

or go to war with the United States without nuclear weapons. The the v leap the boss, weapon. We gave the Iraqis in the Gulf WAR in both of them the Gulf WAR was a lesson to foreign adversaries about one the technological I was the strategic prowess and the just raw power of the? U S military, ladies and gentlemen, you can't fight us, you can't beat us, there is no close. Second, you don't have the economic capability to produce a military or the technological capability or the advanced training. Our people do so. Here's an interesting quote, and it's in a peace that George has up a conservative, h, Q, dot com, which I will put the show notes today, always available podgy know that calm conservative view that comment. You want my show notes, email to your inbox with the articles just go to bonds. You know that com and click subscribed joined my email less than our email right criteria, but he quotes this. Indian chief, ass from the indian military, the chief of staff for the indian Army job and he says exactly that they say asked them

This is one of the lessons to learn from the she'll Gulf WAR and he said- and I quote: don't fight the Americans without nuclear weapons and rest or its draws, a really interesting kind of hello there. He says: well, if that's that ace and he believes it. So when I do as well never fight the United States without nuclear weapons, could you gotta be destroyed and quickly Those who are pursuing nuclear weapons show our pride what we doing. So. Why? Because they I have some goal of fighting the United States. There I mean over simplified the situation. But why else would you pursue nuclear weapons other than as an insurance policy against United States military power, because you plan on doing something against the United States so again not to beat the north korean topic to death, but just something to keep in mind. I am not a and in an interventionist and on a massive scale. I think have you understand that my conservatory and leanings are strong in this respect? But you know we have to

You may have to be reasonable about this, and I know you said to me Joe before yesterday show you are concerned about north korean anywhere. You said that you in Georgia's really say allowed them to me before the show that issues, because where we talk about technical step, but he's like So this is really bother me and I think tat We are all asking is Is this guy Kim? Is he a reasonable person? I don't I don't mean intelligent. I dont need smart. I mean. Is he a rational, maximize or try to rationally maximizes own situation to use in economic terms? Meaning is that dumb to launch a first? nuclear strike against the? U S as their threatening and Guam understanding, job right as he reasonable, rational maximize or would that it will Salt in his immediate annihilation, unlikely the annihilation of his entire country by the United Bates. If you were to launch a first strike nuclear nuclear strike against the United States, everybody gets that right, Joe you get it. I get it Kenwood

these regime would not survive an attack on the United States, but the question is: does he care. That's. The only question: is this guy irrational is rosy reasonable, cannot smart, not moral, not ethical? Is he reasonable any answer? I think a lot of people would give you is, I don't everybody knows anymore so that the problem. I have with this, and I think that's why we have to look at this with open eyes and escape our you know. Whatever libertarian box or conservative box, our intervention, this box, NEO Conservative Box and say, listen, I'm a dad first, if this, a serious about a first strike against the United States, which I gotta much areas, and I want overdrawn. Without this situation, we have to look at this differently. Talk about a loose can get. I'm really no kidding showed said. Yeah for Facebook, livelier, sober Joe said, talk about a loose cannon and yet really what other angle on this earth these north korean story that I hadn't brought up in the past for a number of different reasons, but not my prior job when I was a secret service

it just to show you how the range this regime is. I remember early in my career, this back then, was by the way very sensitive information at its and an eye, Molly recent putting it out there now, because it's really not anymore, there's a Wikipedia page, there's an article in what is it that the telegraph I'll put up in the show notes in its an older article from twenty steam about the North Koreans and counterfeit. Now. How does this relate to me when I first got on the job with the secret service? Back in eighteen? Ninety, nine again this was concerned. Like highly sensitive information? There was a bill Joe. Most impossible to detect. Now that it was one of the members small heads, the small, had bills there was one of the member, the small heads, the small, had bills before we get into the big heads. You know that you know the big head back. Ben Franklin and Hamilton system. Those lol, head bills, there four hundred dollar bills and circulation that were- and let me tell you when you do come-

if it like a secret service agent, does every single there. You can see counterfeit joke like that in ITALY. In you just lucky: go yeah, that's whatever the Colombian you know Pino did. You know about dwellers, a printer notes, but the calamity eighteen, ninety four c, if peace is remember, maybe you could detect it like that. You know they all numbers and stuff. That's not! The year was made, but the classification, these bills were nearly impossible to detect the counterfeit hundreds and it was mystery. Who is producing them, while not nineteen? I deny, but would when they first showed up job and you had to send these bills that headquarters in order to vote why they were in fact counterfeit. That's crazy about that guy, when counterfeiters entire life has seen everything from like photo cop notes which anybody could pick out to at the time Colombia. Counterfeit, which was really really good. You ve seen everything and even they could not pick denotes out. They had sent him the forensic, a forensic experts in here That's how good these notes were

came out later on and again now its widespread knowledge. It's not you know, whip classified as well, Well, there's probably the North Koreans, who were state sponsoring this, and the conclusions was that there was no way this bill could be produced by regular run. Male counterfeiters, the United States currency. The time had a lot of security features, Joe that would have cost millions and millions and millions of dollars just to develop the technology to produce and who, as a kind of money, to produce counterfeit. If you add that kind of money, Joe you wouldn't counterfeit so just again another angle of this, to show you how the range the North Korea's war that they were actually developing their own printing press, for U S currency to make sure that they had hard currency even with was counterfeit to go by. Stuff to Github. Shuttle occur the border to bring back to give.

How to skip they would use the counterfeit us. Currency is hard currency to buy things. Another country, ship them back into North Korea and their leaders would give them out as gifts and stuff, but this stuff was a big big, big problem. So I'll put an article in the air from the teller, then the notes they read it. It's actually a pretty cool article even from last year about what the you know that it's called the soup, dollar, other super note and yeah. It was you I remember it was so good what whatever you guys off, that it might be counterfeit, disrupt quick eye. What what Tipp this often it was. Counterfeit. If I remember the story correctly, this thing circuit aid for years before anybody picked up on, there was a super savvy banker somewhere, and I like, for obvious robys reasons I can't say what it was but there was a feature on the bill that if I too Are you guys you'd be like no way they saw that no way like you?

a microscope to see it, but it was a little bit off from the regular note and eve. I remember: Sometimes you would get these suspect notes, they say this. You know a super note and you'll be like I don't know, I have to send the headquarters even with a microscope. So yeah was it, but It was this one thing on the back of the no not the front, and yet some bankers saw it and I remember everybody was freaking out, coordinate the story. I heard that well, what the hell is this. This is like some serious counterfeit, so good questions, one because you always bring it all right. So story number two today John Tammy, a really great up in the Wall Street Journal. It may be subscriber only I'll included the show notes anyway. It's it's a really good piece. It talks about it. Listen I I you know, I respect President night, I support its agenda when, in the lines we conservative values- which thankfully has been often

You know. I really appreciate a lady's, but doing that. Sometimes we have some disagreements. You know the trade think keeps coming up. I'm I think, he's a little wrong on trade, but it's ok I mean. Do you know about the both cannot defend what we believe, but one of the things have to disagree with them on, and I know I'm going to get a little bit of negative email. That's why I don't defend my position and you know you defend yours, but I'm always going to be honest with you is The present is we're talking a lot about the benefits of a weak dollar and in case you think, I'm making this up. Here's a quote: Tammany puts in peace from the president. He said, Missus presented Trump less money he said lots of bad things happen with a strong dollar now to be clear, to set the premise of upward. I can about really critical issue folks and having a lot of people, at this the wrong way: not only wrong way in an economically catastrophic wrong way and I'll explain my position in the second. Dollars just the idea that the United States Dollar, the Federal Reserve no, would mean we would consider an actual our green back is strong relative to other currencies, meaning your. Our buys a lot of stuff in foreign currency buys up. You know

let's say, image all rights, a relative term, but let's say you know, ten years to go. One dollar bought one yen in Japan. A strong dollar would mean whatever a dollar buys ten years now, and it s a really really strong dollar. But you get the point, I'm just trying to give you the explain, I mean by strong dollar costs of those people say that it is move on without explaining the premiership, now vote Let me say this in unequivocal terms. I have disagree with the present around this, though dollar- is not a good thing now when I say that I mean that on the margin near there are things. Of course, there are going to be benefits isolated. If it's in some industries to a weak dollar. If you have a company that exports right, you export The end and ninety percent of your items are home base dollar denominated stuff, so you're, an exporter that doesn't import a lot of stuff, yeah, of course, you're going to benefit from a weak dollar, and yet we can discuss this last week a little bit, but I have the redressing it keeps coming up because the present

keeps matching the benefits of a weak dollar and, frankly candidly, for something that's true. That would. But you know if you are in an export, or only which is rare and I'll, get to that in a second Why is that? Because, if you have your dollar week. That means other people's currencies are strong. So you're buying more with their money and aching by more of your stuff, because your stuff is sold in dollars, so weak armies, a strong foreign currency which allows people in foreign countries by more stuff with their yen, nor or renminbi or whatever. It may be makes sense, but the problem is that's a very limited approach and I'll get to that. So point number one the premises trying to do is to set in concrete here is that a weak dollar is a good thing as strong dollars to quote him creates bad things is that would make exports cheaper, but the problem with that is the folks. What's in export anymore, you may say well

in Amerika. We export stuff overseas all the time right, right, ok, you're right, but some of this stuff we sport overseas is up a good chunk of are imported items into the final export, so Tammany writes about a couple things, one of em sensitive to me right now. He says you know the F one. Fifty truck I just bought a rapid and by the way this car kicks all over point us all yeah. I know it's been a loved this car forty did a great job with the raft urban drive in it. So I get broken in right now, but the F one, fifty job Arap there's a kind of effluent. Fifty, one. Third of it is imported parts what you're saying all know, we're exporting to foreign countries and a weak dollar is good because it makes their currency stronger, so they can buy more raptors yeah, but one slash three of the parts in the end of F one hundred and fifty or third of the parts have to be bought from Farhan Khan. With a weaker dollar. It has make negative sides not only that miss all that

one car. Now the jeep wrangler before tourist, these all have one third, parts are imported. Point, Tammany makes, which is a brilliant one, I know we ve covered on the show before is it it makes energy more expensive as well. We still, even though producing a lot of hydraulically fractured oil in the country. Right now, through fracturing inaction, oh gas! We port, a lot of oil stolen lot of Petra petroleum products. Folks, if we are buying, with a weak dollar its, us thing us more in work to get it because we have to pay with more dollars to get the same oil because the dollar is weak. Now, Joe, yes, energy this kind of a component of just about everything. We do just about everything the view and I outside sorry to veto, eating and breathing and functioning we're, not second up a lot of energy to do the pot. Guess I've Amigo camera running. I have a computer running

however, an Ipad. What are eaten up alive energy, but everything even a service oriented industry like would show in Ireland in content production. We're not Joe and I are both in our butts on an assembly line like you know, work is hard working manufacturers. Would I like what we HU. I appreciated, but I appreciate their per manual labor debt, but their workers. There's a lot of energy. My point four energy is built into the price of every product you buy everywhere across, the country, so we we, the dollar and we increase the cost of energy. How is I couldn't make our products cheaper for other people to buy overseas or not the answer it's not going to make them cheaper? It doesn't make economic sense. Listen I get. I You stand what's going on the white ass. There are competing interests there. There is some some, your men factoring based industries that do export, and maybe there

Joe, is say. Ninety five percent domestic made that they would benefit. There's no question because far and money can buy more their start right. The problem is overwhelming numbers of companies in the United States. Do not have products that are exclusively made here. That's what they call them the name. If you want to sound economically pseudo sophist, I hate these to tell them that you know the breaking up the global supply chain meeting their due. Really are in any exports and imports anymore. I know I discuss this unless we put its important hammer home, because the re emphasis right now, the White Ass, a weakening the dollar. This is a we bad idea. Okay, so just to hammer home point, one they'll say: oh, it makes export sheep or no it doesn't. It increases the cost the energy and it doesnt defined. What an export is, what, if an export as one third info, that's how you gonna make it cheaper. It doesn't make sense. Here's a second point: they would you want to make our exports cheaper. This is that the Tammany brings us up, as was another great point, when we,

Gus on the show, constantly idea productivity. You really want to make cheaper in an economically efficient, and more rational way, then we need to focus on investment productivity. Forget it making our product cheaper by cheapening the currency by the way, Joe we're all paid. Are paid in, U S dollars, why would you want to weaken the currency? Ladies and gentlemen, exports or not, more than the price we pay for imports. Do you have to understand that concept to understand the new wants, a trade policy exports are the price we pay for imports. If countries around. The world wants to sell us stuff fur for peanuts. Frankly, if they want to give it to us for free we should take it- and I always use the example of two islands, do you have one day, and I would be forget, the whole country analogy cause it can attend to confuse people based on the numbers. If you have an island, the people a hundred people about Ireland Day and its and the world than a hundred people on island be an island, It produces food in Qatar,

prison and how products and whenever in fishing poles, and they want a ship them over to Island day for free. Why would you not take it now? You don't have to build them stop. You can do other things, you can go to the first enamel thing in member that gillikins island they always have like exercise bikes, is doubly when everything was made at a cocoanuts Gilligan such my ass God. Yes, that's right maybe that's what you can do. Instead, you now have more time to produce other things. It's the whole idea of command Van driver just because we can make stop there. That means we always should folks either It's a really insane idea. You want to make our exe it's cheaper. What we should be doing is allowing people to sell us stuff cheaply so that we can take american workers, invest in them and allow to produce more output with the same amount of input, we shouldn't investing in it in an assembly line Joe and allowing them to make Ford cars cheaper and allowing

to make you know: Chevy trucks cheaper and allowing them to make jeep wranglers cheaper. I mean american good american products whenever carrier whatever it may be, that we have that carrier thing where they move their plan, allow Then the make products cheaply here investing in assembly lines that allow them to make more products at a cheaper price technology enables you to do. That is why a flat screen tv you can get for two under fifty bucks companies, figured out a way to investment in their product lines how to make these products cheaper. That's the way you make him cheaper, you don't do by chief the dollar at silly. It's not gonna work and it fine one more point, I will move on a different story: s up! That's really interesting member, where paid in dollars. Folks, you, paid in dollars- and I Paden Yen- You'Re- not paid and men be Europe in krona. You are paid in. U S dollars, cheapening. Currency you're paid in that allows you to acquire products and services you need is never going to be the way to economic prosperity. I'm sorry so, output, Tammany peace in a really good one, but it does kind of itself

in a way why this emphasis on our side? dollar brings about bad things is just not accurate folks, I'm sorry, it's economically doesn't make a lot of sense or another Sorry I saw today which was interesting because it hammers home this abuse of statistics that goes on more people are trying to make a political argument. Now I don't know this woman, and I know she has worked for a left wing, think tanks, or I'm not sure You know I m sure intentions were pure. I think she may have just kind of you know skewed in a little bit. Eighty I Abby Mcclosky piecing cato- I don't know the woman again, I'm tried impugn her motives here, but she had there's a quote. She has a twelve percent of private. Check your employees of access to paid family leave from their employer and everybody kind of freaked out over the statistically. But how do I get a lot of comments or Facebook LIVE acres data? How are you folks. This family leave thing. This is another push you get out of my trying to harp on the White House today and hammer them in, but this has been a big push by. If I go to push repaid family and the statistical,

please drone round. As this statistic, the one I just told you. Twelve percent of private sector employs of access to paid family. Employer people a freak out over at all my gosh only twelve percent, while this grape sing Cato that debunks this completely unsuitable that doesn't comport with reality. It doesn't make sense and is just to show you how sometimes statistics can be abused by by the way folks saying just by liberals, although I do a lot but by people, any party want to advance in writing. This is a very bad idea by the way to an event is pushing this to push for a government program for mandatory paid family leave. I think it's a very bad idea. I don't think the government's going to solve the problem. I don't think the government has the capability of the intellect to solve the problem Seeing this statistic is wrong hears why, in the Cato peace, the author decades it surveys of this. When you add, when you Joe, when you actually go out to the workplace and ask people pay view too can family leave to take care of your are paid families. Take your family moment of birth of a child sixty

three percent of people say. Yes, we have aware, my weary time out red flag up for review right, if only to percent of the workforce, according to the Bureau of Labour statistics which, by well, you should already be like all kinds of government can Anthony, so that you should always be sceptical, but if only to Percent of people have family leave. How come sixty three percent of people in a certain way say they took pay family leave, it doesn't make sense. There is always a kicker. Here's, the kicker on this one to be less is, is using the definition of leave to mean leave only usable for paid family, so in other words, job say you in- and God forbid, you have a family health crisis over their enormous cost wants to take a leaf from his w c p m job in the morning, Joe you you have carried over from last year, twenty six days, five sick. They, I don't know ten sick days. Thirty vacation dates.

You may say of the jobless and I'm gonna take some time off to spend some time, but little Joe I'll be back in two weeks. Ok, go. They clapped thanks Joe, I hope you're. Ok, haven't. I start thanks for your hard work, seeing a couple weeks right now. I know not all, but that's not. How did with the B l s being less known, ass to be specifically forfeit repaid family. If only it can't be sick time, it can't be vacation time. It can't be anything else which is ridiculous. If Joe, if you use your leave and we're getting paid while you're on leave and you're still taking care of your family. What do you care They categorize it now, I'm cool with. Of course, your call But then, if I know you're cool, because you call the because you need to pay check, you need your job and you need a job to come back to. While you also cause, I know Joe loves his family. You need to take care of your family first, so the hope this thing is this is again the government and my camera? a pile on the White House. Today I mean, I just think is a really bad idea. This is the government finding problem for a solution.

You know what I was in, that secret service was the same way. You add a bunch of art Judy. I wish there was leave you add that were sick leave. You add the m. I pity, as an unlimited when I was a cop, has an limited sick leave policy, if you're taking out to take care of her child. This it's out they are. The solutions are already out there that Joe free people are making agreements with free employers to make it work for them. The governments, not to be able to fix this, I'm sorry the governments just going to exacerbate the problem, make it worse, as it always does so. I'm gonna put that peace in the show north. I strongly suggest you read it not just because it debunks left arguments about only twelve percent of people. I may act the family, which is wrong, but because It shows you again. Governments statistics be very, very careful what you read a united. Morning. I wanted to talk for some reason. I had this act with pay family, but may trend, and I saw Kate all my co. Perfect is Cato pieces. Terrific

I Didn'T- show, also brought you by our friends at my Patriot supply gosh. What today to talk about the eminent emergency food supply man alive, my patriot supplied with me for a long time. I'm a really big fan Paradise and if any view out there a reading this north korean story and are aware of the threat of any MP and electro magnetic pulse, which would be a new. Clear, detonation the atmosphere which, by the way, the North Korea repeatedly threatened use, be concerned about it if you're not gonna. Suggesting anybody. Panic, I'm not suggesting we're on the verge of nuclear wars in some people had meltdown yesterday and I M in the media, but I am suggesting it makes, absolutely zero sense and not be prepared occasional Where would an MP would do by the way an atmosphere it get? Nation would knock out most of our power grid and we don't have the Cape it would be right now to produce transformers on a massive scale. I don't mean transformers, like the movie transformers, more than It's the I about electric Ella Electric transformers that required to get any He ain't your household, we don't have the capable.

Them on a scale produces. If you know that a lot of them are protected, with those faraday type cages. You would have no electric for potentially a year's folks. This is really important stuff that where prepare just be prepared, simple, my patriot supply will say you have one month: survive emergency food produced ninety nine box, it's it just ninety nine dollars. So one month, supplies one person. I have four people, my household sway of have quite a few boxes at my house: go grab it issues, ninety nine box better to have it not needed them. Not have it being prepared matters yet go to prepare with Dan dot com. That's prepare with Dan dot com and pick up you one month, supply of emergency food. Today's breakfast lunch dinner at last twenty five years. That's a really really long time. I will be old and decrepid, potentially not even alive by them, but people get upset when I say that, although I say it all the time because I'm followed, part as we speak right now, are I thought less story of the day. I saw with job again it just speaks

the futility of the left advocating for this failure? That is Obamacare and I hate to keep talking about the Obamacare topic. As I know it gets to be a nuisance. But it's not just like what I the current surplus it drives people, while that Bill Clinton never had a surplus. But liberals will insist they do and it's not about the current surplus is just about the media. Insisting something happened. They didn't happen that anybody can look up. I keep talking about the failures of Obama care because it's just dynamic of how liberals will defend the fella failed idea, no matter how much information comes out about how failed that idea is benefit shook, and I took a screen shot of another interesting piece by a Cato, the neighbour drudge. They have a rasmussen, Paul and some use and the number of the day Joe Sid, six point. Five billion? People are now paying a fine for Obamacare. So think about that, I want to emphasise the lives and to conservatives out there. This

the level of Obamacare is now off the charge so badly that I dont understand how liberal still, with a straight face without a smirking defend this abomination. Sir submissions number that they six point, five million people in the United States are now paying a fine to not have to buy your barbecue think about this job. People appointed I rest by the way you know this as well as I do. People will do just about anything to avoid paying their their tax law they. Well that's where tax evasion criminally I'm talking about tax avoidance, Some people will dominate the charity to get out of a taxable demi. Most people don't eat the charity. Does he like charity? But, let's be honest Do it because it's good tax benefits, do it some p? or by you, don't muni bonds to avoid the tax or on that people will do just about anything We avoid paying higher taxes Joe Dearest, point: five million people in a country of only three hundred plus million who are paying the IRS extra body to get out of buying this crap sandwich

Quotas Obamacare, that's number number one for refugees number two. Fifteen million people would drop Obamacare, for it is legal to do so. Folks, do you understand work talking about right now over twenty million people, we're talking about new ten percent of the population, the United States and, by the way, a very You have been actually subjected to Obama characters. Remember it was for the individual market right. So up that you're talking the overwhelming number of people that we pay or would do anything to get out of this thing tomorrow. They would pay off Why do the IRS and fifteen million people would drop it tomorrow if they wouldn't have to pay the five, because it sucks that bed and yet they still argue for, but that those are old numbers there's another? sincere and other. I quote in the piece of Rasmussen put it the show notes again, as while the rest meeting

peace is governed by a health policy, analyse name Bob Lazuli. Forgive me Bob from saying your name. Road might have put you did, but it seems pretty straightforward, Joe, but listen what about the take as they get? This is solely the futility of this disaster, put your Bob Use E health policy analyst he. Forty percent of those eligible for subsidies have side, therefore coverage in what other business or government programme. Would such a with such a desire acceptance rate by though it was intended to serve be considered a success. Think about the number of children that that would forty per those eligible for subsidies, folks, the pearl sucks so bad that only four out of ten people who are being given money by other taxpayers to buy a product to buy it Obama care. Comply and insurance plan, the video individual market. If you get a group of ten people and you're giving them taxpayers, money

other taxpayers. What you said here, it is free you, it's not free to other taxpayers, but it's free to you. Work saying this to you to buy Obamacare only and a half of whom are taking the money. Now he brings up a great point, health policy embassies gush. What other business But what would this be? A success rate imagined job you're, giving away. You have Programme is that you have a new business and in say, Pat rocks and you're sitting on a street corner at people are walking by and you're giving it Ray, and I want it that might be a coup that your product really socks or you're in a store and you're You know you're in the bread I'll and every eye, Miss for sale and abroad. I accept this one. I mean like free, Brad right here and everybody I pass. It goes to pay for the bread tat be a sign that the bread really really sticks, but not the lips. The fact that you can't give you can't

six out of ten people money to buy Obamacare defected six point five. Million are paying a fine to not bio Obamacare and fifteen million people would drop it tomorrow if they wish, was legal to do so. This is a clear to you at all. Are you ever open to an alternate? you pointed out, or are you just so committed to your blind allegiance to a bomb? It has failed programme that you will say anything to keep this thing. Go it. I mean it's an abomination. I that now Is it a mom watching a fox hunting. Tobacco ensures to withdraw from Obamacare marketplace: Edna, anthem, Harkin, humanity, minute and help I mean the list goes on and on and on immediate just insane some guidance to my facebook? You stop yelling into the mighty freed up as the benefit of their facebook live. Now you don't listen,

POD, guess, Clare. I one more point. I wanted to make on Uno bombing hears a really great peace in Cato. We cannot put this in the universe is well folks, Obama cares, the affordable care act anymore. Why really talking about, of course, affordable care act was the legislative name for Obamacare, no note on donor folks, the original, affordable Correct, no longer exists. What is open, I care now is not the affordable care and in Nepal, in Canada, we talked about, I'm gonna go to all of them, but he talks about T ways, Obama As we know what the original affordable care is not Obamacare. Now it's a completely different. Thanks when you say too liberal, for you say to your liberal friends, you know who defend the affordable care twenty ten to twenty forty, something we brought up repeatedly my care you talking about yesterday's Obamacare. You talk about the Obamacare that actually passed. So here are a couple of things: I will Congress to remain in the Effie HP from twenty eight ten to twenty forty, something we brought up repeatedly there

They congressional exemption for Obamacare right. They are in the FDA be by the ways the Federal Employees Health Benefits programme. I was in my last job. It's actually a pretty well run programme because the government doesn't run it is paid for by your government tax thousand federal poise camps. Their own programme Congress was allowed to stay in that when they were supposed to buy their insurance as party affordable care act from from the exchanges, but that didn't happen so again the affordable care. I no longer exists, as we originally know it. The baby of exemption severely scaffolds abilities. Former h, H S secretary under Obama, issued unions and other firms from various regulations. So again, if you're a big believer in the affordable care act which one the one that where's unions and organisations, to do these a b and c or the one where they were all given. Exemptions, the one that force Congress to I owe bomber care from exchanges or the one that exempting them from doing so, which one do you support? I mean you can't even argument liberals, because the goalposts keep moving

she says in the peace, the threat civilian made to insurance. You spoke publicly in truth, we about the cost of those regulations. I remember that one. Civilian soliciting funds for Enroll America from company she regulates. This was basically Catholics who is the age secretary under a Obama, was looking for fun, is the advertise for Obamacare from the health in industry company. She actually regulars nothing wrong, they're, folks, folks, ass. I call that a government shakedown, because that's not what it is that just the government that their gently asking Zira things to happen. Of course, if you say no, we see the deuce easier, the Supreme Court rewrite, individual mandate, twenty twelve again, which Obamacare do you support the one where Burma one on tv in an interview with a major network news, Channel and Obama, said the individual mandate was not attacks? We, I know that sound cut. Yet we will never get it.

We're a barber actually when I think was restored, Stephan opulence and he asked them about the penalty for not buying Obamacare said. Is that attacks on? Oh now, at a rate of tax? That's what he said. Words up my Dennis this is general and went to the Supreme Court argued for Obamacare argued that the interval, individual mandate to make a constitutional court acceptable argued. The individual mandate was attacked folks again, which with it, which one is it if you're the ending Obamacare. Is it the Obamacare that said the individual mandate was not attacks, like Obama himself said, or a? U defending it. Mama care they defended in the Supreme Court. That argued that the individual it was in fact attacks which one by the way those macho man cuts? We gotta get? You gotta keep those MIKE Instant stand by for the future. You know I love that's watched antibody. Oh yes, but Joe this morning did I had pulled the nose. I love macho man. Savage don't know

Joe, you gotta have those we once in a while. We got it, you are. We won't overdue or my promise, but once in a while Joe pulled up an o, yea and equally pull up a no no two right. We need that because that would be perfect right now for this segment. I should tell you for this, but good job on end, unless a couple more let's see, Obama's illegal if you, like, your health plan, fix grandmother plants, exemptions, in other words, memory, you like your plane, you could keep it there. I always knew that you couldn't keep your plan. They re, hold a lot of Obamacare to make sure you could not keep your plan, it was all nonsense will get, which one do you support by just two more. It will move on the Obama administration, making illegal cs our payments. Folks, this one is important. It keeps come. You have to understand that the liberals, right now are arguing for a policy, these cost sharing reduction payments, their monthly payments from you, the taxpayer, to health insurance companies. Liberal.

Are actually advocating for this, and sadly the trumpet ministries, your forest, continue. These payments, for I get it it's going to disrupt the insurance market, but you cannot argue on one hand that the evil health insurance companies, as the liberals argued by the way these evil health insurance. Destroying the country and, on the other hand, argue to taxpayers should be sending their monthly payments listening, yesterday's show, or the day before we go into this little more. Finally,. Let's see the Obama administration, I legally diverting reinsurance payments from the Treasury to insurance companies. This one was a killer day. The treasure There were payments, reinsurance payments ever supposed to be made from insurance companies making money under Obamacare to company, TAT were struggling. Well. What was the problem Joe again how Obamacare is was written written so, which one do you support that one or the one worthy reinsurance payments were taken from the treasury? Now you may wait? You just said that reinsurance payments were designed the robot care to come from insurance cover

he's making money in a flow to insurance companies that were struggling to quote Joe stabilize the markets. But what happened Joe. What what happened was. Nobody was making money so that Treasury Attica bid and back feel that those payments were supposed to Made back to the Treasury went up when money was be by the insurance companies which, by the way Joe did not happen. It didn't happen. Those payments have been made, which Obamacare do you support folks, these number, the devastating- and it's really really is its difficult. It's getting difficult right now to argue with brought about which Obamacare they support why they supported, because they don't seem to be reasonable anymore. They seem to be too, CERN with defending political ideology and the Euro. They leave the legacy of Barack Obama, rather than actually defending the economic affair, given this financial effectiveness and and healthcare arena effectiveness of Obamacare to really disgrace it's. Why get frustrated dealing with these folks Iphone takes the opportunity- and I really appreciate it-

I'll see. You are just ten Bonn GINO. She did more than all mine in time and conservative review dot com. You can also get dance, podcast zone, Itunes or sound cloud and follow then on twitter. Twenty four seven at De Bonn, GINO.