Recently in an interview with sixty minutes, Alexandria counterpart has floated the idea of a seventy percent top income rate on people who make more than ten million dollars per year and immediately the political debate erupted. People the right said that tax rate is way too high and you're going to encourage the wealthy to go, invest in other countries. The left said its own They are people who make more than ten million dollars its tiny. This is absurd and there is some new wants to this debate. I don't think or TAT was actually saying this, what you want. You floated the idea, so it should be debated, but there's something bigger at play here. It seems like for some reason or cause your protest, as is the poster child for Democrats. She is the most important Democrat just more followers, Nancy Policy does and her career just started. I have to wonder why people take what you

as so seriously when she's just a congresswoman who just started her career. In my opinion, she is the most important Democrat with many people on both the left and the right saying she represents the future of the Democrats. I believe there is a good possibility, she's on a path towards the presidency, hear me out, based on the press, and I dont want to save session, but the constant conversation about her all its doing. Making them more and more famous. Today, let's take a look, What's going on this tax rate idea that people are debating, and I will talk about how the press impacting her career and how it's going to benefit her and alive run before we get started place at over. The TIM casts doubt comforts life. Don't it if you'd like to support my work,

innovation option. I take crypto cursing I've physical address and there is even a shop where you could buy clothing. I designed myself a couple days ago. We saw the story from hot air a yo see how about a tax rate of seventy percent to fund my green new deal because you quartet set an interview. You know you look at our tax rates back in the sixties and when you have a progressive tax rate system, your tax rate, you know, let's say from zero to seventy five thousand- maybe ten percent or fifty percent etc. But once you get too like the tippy tops on your ten million dollar, sometimes she tax rates as high as sixty or seventy percent. That doesn't mean all ten million dollars are taxed at an extremely high rate, but it means that, as you come up this ladder, you should be contributing more. I think that it only has ever been radicals that have changed this country. Abraham Lincoln made the radical decision to sign the Emancipation Proclamation Franklin Delano, Roosevelt may the radical decision to him.

On establishing programs like Social security, that is radical when asked if she considers itself to be a radical Cortez says you know, if that's what radical means call me a radical immediately. We see defence from the left that her idea actually make sense. New York, MAC said: okay this report has a seventy percent. Top tax rate is a moderate evidence based policy. They start by saying when Ronald Reagan took office, apple, Americans paid a seventy percent tax rate on income above two hundred sixteen thousand dollars the decade. Since our countries, highest earners have seen their annual pay skyrocket, while the media household has barely budged. As a result, America's a hundred and sixty thousand richest families now lay claim to ninety percent of its wealth. Studies suggest that this kind of inequality erode social trust of bats, plutocracy and depresses economic growth. Politicians from both major parties routinely suggest that they see inequality is a major problem, not find the whole tax debate interesting and where I

And typically, centre left, I'm not entirely opposed to very high tax rates on very high income, and I think the conversation is actually nuanced. I believe it is a fair statement to say that many wealthy will not invest in the U S, because when they realise that income above ten million dollars is Textron, extreme debris they're going to look elsewhere for a base of operations, they're not going to want to earn money here, because it will negatively impact them personally. But it is tough. They are genuinely few people who make that much money relative to the world So Cortez idea of taxing people that high doesn't necessarily mean she's, going to actually generate income from these people. In all likelihood, court has is wrong and that higher tax rate won't work for a few reasons. First, as conservatives point out, people might just leave the country best elsewhere. However, the other issue is that people just try to find ways to reduce their tax liability. You'll, see people making them much money reinvest in other programmes which, in my opinion, our good thing, though reinvesting economy which could lead to growth, and it is typically why I'm

kind of in favour of the tax, not necessarily because you actually generate revenue from it, but it encourages people to put back into the economy. When you know you're going to reach a certain bracket, you're, better off spending that money or investing in something, then just paying the tax on it in some instances. Oh, I think it may be too. I am more of a centrist than someone far left to agree with her, but I do think the conversations and nuanced, in fact an interesting point on the taxes from last year was that Steve Bannon actually advocated for increasing the tax rate. This story last year from Vocs Steve Bandit, is right. Donald Trump should raise taxes on which they say, White House chief strategy. Steve Benefits, a big idea that, according to access, he's, been pushing aggressively within the trumpet ministration raising the top income tax rate is reportedly telling his colleagues. The top racket should have a four.

front of it now, ultimately, Steve Man, it is no longer working in the White House and a forty percent top income tax rate is much less than seventy percent, but it's not unheard of that. Even people associated with the right are willing to consider increasing the top marginal tax rate on people who make over a certain amount of money. That's other progressive tax system works. A lot of conservatives disagree, but beyond the tax argument, there's something else, I think is much more important. The fact that Alexander Abkhazia Cortez matters this much I mean. Why are we even talking about her idea for tax rate she's, just one congresswoman of hundreds? Why is it that when she steps forward and says something everybody wants to talk about it now? Obviously, when it comes to her guests

This is low hanging fruit. For Republicans, they can point out how crazy young new progressive Democrats are when even Polyte effect has given in Alexandria cause your protest. Numerous pants on fire and mostly false ratings, when the Washington Post has factor and given are multiple Pinocchio is its fodder for public and to say the Democrats. If this is the future you're in trouble now many people on the right have said she is the future. They saint negatively people left, say it positively. It's a good thing: she's progressive, she's, a minority woman. This is what the Democrats are going to be in the future, and I gotta admit. I think that a cause of protests does actually. We have a path to the presidency. I really do but hear me out. She just started a career and she already as more followers than almost all of the other Democrats. Many of them combined just more follow. where's the Nancy Policy, the speaker of the house and she's rivalling Elizabeth worn, whose

early running for the President court has says things often they're wrong, but it doesn't matter. The left is willing to forgive her shortcomings because they like that she's on their side. She represents what they like. Many people on the right are willing to forgive Donald Trump shortcomings because he represents their side. He opposes political correctness, he's a tough guy. He wants border security. They like that. So, if dropped says something wrong will say hey, but you know forgiveness. The left does the same thing for Cortez when Cortez says something and everybody I want it to be the story. It just seems like she's, on a path for mass celebrity, and one thing we heard into doesn't it was that Barack Obama was a celebrity president, but the reason he was able to win was because he was just famous and he had better brand power than everyone else. I could say the same thing for trump many people mocked they ridicule tromp. They said he would never win, but they couldn't stop talking about him. Every time trumped did something controversial boom frightened.

On tv. Cortez is on the exact same path, and now we can see the other day when a compromise was dancing nothing Times claims that it was meant as a smear and yes technically s true, but it was just one person. In fact, the reason this story went viral in my opinion is because conservatives we're talking about it to no one really criticized for dancing, but many people on the right, the sun.

And the left appropriately said. This is ridiculous. Why are you making fun of a young college and for having fun with her friends? It's not it's not a story, but that made it a story. Every one was talking about its own response than your times, and many other news outlets want to write about what happened and they framed in such a way that it seems like the right was actually criticise inner they worked. It was one person on Twitter that had barely any followers who called re nitwit. Why is that news is actually not news? When you note happens when every high profile person comments on it now, it is news the story isn't that this one person criticized the story is that everyone criticized the one person all that really matters is once again. Cortez is front. End centre in the spotlight

but did you got somewhere between ten and twenty million views, and that is pure brand power. But things like this keep happen. The way I see it, it's a snowball, rolling downhill that can't be stopped here. I am making a video about how everyone keeps talking about Alexandria, Cassio Quarters, and this is only going to for more attention. Now there, but a lot of conservatives was at ten stop talking about giving our attention and, like I, I dont care she its attention, I'm not here to support or pose anybody

I'm just here to commoner. What's going on, so I say this to conservatives for one. If you think that this is bad for your wrong, tromp was ridiculed, it was good for him. He got free press, they estimate five billion dollars in free press because people loved the controversy and sure it may. The left gonna go nuts in terms of hating Donald Trump to a real ridiculous degree. In my opinion, it still gave him the attention to make him a front runner, no matter how many times trumps has something controversial or does something controversial. He comes out on top and you could argue the same thing for Cortez if you think, or policies are crazy and she can't win because of that, I think Europe onto it, doesn't matter what policies are it matters that she represents the tribe and it matters that she's famous? If you're famous you win and that's why so many celebrities are talking about running for president? So look: do I really think you

president. I don't know, I think it's a pretty bold statement, but I think she certainly on track to be. If you play cards right in the next ten or so years, he's gonna get a ton of experience is going to work in DC and he's gonna better understand the game. It it's possible. She gets better at reducing the amount of gifts or she can making gas, because it gets her attention. You can argue all day and night that you silly that you stupid she's lying is wrong, doesn't matter when she says these things it works in her favour. The same is true for Donald Trump. I've seen this before, I feel like she is the left's version of Donald Trump. She has a populist candidate. She has many controversial statements that have been marked by the meat and she won her district in spite of the poles she's on a similar trajectory. When I talk to people about marketing, because I've used to working on profits, I say the best products in the world will fail. If no one knows about it and the way,

first product and the world will sell by the millions if everyone has heard of it? If you don't have good marketing, you don't have anything. Marketing comes first, and that means, regardless of what court has actually believes. We ve got a tribalism problem. The left was a porter, no matter what they will defend her to the teeth, and they will criticise me for calling out her guests, which rightly so, should be done as it matter them. You criticise, Cortez, you're, the other and they will defend or no matter what so the more brand power she develops. The better her chances of gaining significant power will be the way I see it. The right is going to me her into the presidency and the left is along for the ride. So you have to believe me tat. You can argue with me all day and night common below, but for me, as someone who's moderately as a moderate sitting in the center, I look at what have with TAT and I thought was hilarious. The left was so snooty an about how they would never lose about. How trot could never win, and you have that famous clip where

it was, I believe, is on Bill MAR they ask an Coulter who has the best chance of winning. She says Donald Trump. They all just burst out laughing yup. You might think it's silly, but if you don't pay attention and you go get you're you're dots in a row, you will end up with President Cortez in maybe ten to fifteen years. Maybe not, though, I think it's a pretty bold protection to make. I'm just saying, with ever that's going on she's going to gain power. Our policies will get past because she has support from the Democrats plain and simple so long as she's loud enough and people supporter Sherwin below mentioning the comments below gave a conversation going that a couple of different things talk about Let me just what a seventy percent tax rate because look, I'm almost interests than Eileen left, so I think there is theirs.

to enact a higher tax rate. Seventy percent might be a little ridiculous, but I think there is theirs unintended consequences that are necessarily bad, like wealthy people being forced to reinvest in the economy and just general like I'm on the left are much who opposed to it. But if you're conservative and you think it's too high- it doesn't make sense for tax in the wealthy that much then common below the conversation going and let us think about her on her path to success. How do you think the media is is playing its role? You think it's on purpose to advocate the conversation gone. You can follow me on Twitter, attend guest statehood enough everyday, four, p, M and I'll have more because my second channel Youtube com slashed him gas news story at six p m thanks bring it up, you will next time.