There are many metrics by which it seems that the right is actually winning the media war, television rights. is newsprint circulation and digital media engagements gathered Emma Second Channel, I was reading an article about american polarization and in it they linked to a study from news with this This shows that on social media, the most actively engaged with page for the left is occupied. Democrats, a propaganda conspiracy website, whereas the right typically engages with Fox NEWS, which, while it is partisan, is considered to be a credible, piece of information. I started dig into more data and does seem that across the board, whatever is happening right now, it looks like conservatives are consuming and engaging with media way more than the left is I don't oh how that will translate into the mid terms, but I think it can have a significant impact. So, first, Let's take a look at television ratings to see just who is winning spoiler alert. Its Fox news

before I get started, please patriotic outcome, forts lashed him cast tops for my work. Patrons are the backbone of the content. I could if you like these videos- and you want to see more like it and you like the videos on my second channel, please consider going to patriotic dotcom, slashed and gas to help support my ad weak. Has the scoreboard for Saturday October six, the latest ratings from major cable news programmes, as was published just yesterday, Now we need only look at a few data points. First in the key demo of twenty five to fifty four Fox news. Prime time was five hundred and eighty three thousand CNN was a hundred thirty six Amazon. She was eighty two and eighty Ellen was ninety two. If you come by ain't, CNN and Amazon BC. Fox news has more than double their view. Worship. You could even combine all three. Fox NEWS is still dominating and it gets really. Interesting when you look at total view, worship Fox news. Prime time was three million three point: three million.

If you are a combined CNN, MSNBC and H. Alan Fox NEWS is still around three times higher. In total view, worship in past videos, I've made. We saw A Fox news was about a hundred thousand viewers, more than CNN and MSNBC, combined in total of your ship Fox news. It have like two point: five million CNN plus MSNBC would equal about two point. Three two point: four million now from this past weekend in total of your ship Primetime Fox NEWS has more than three times there of your ship. Now is actually shop, A lot of people like to make the claim that Fox NEWS is viewers are old and they're all dying, but when we look at the key demographic, twenty five to fifty four, we can see that true CNN does like two Brad their view. Worship is on average younger by about four or five years, then Fox NEWS, but does that really matter when five? News has more than four times the viewer ship in the key demo. They can sit there and

rag. All they want of Europe is younger, but Fox NEWS has four times the younger viewers. So does it really matter, but where things start, to get pretty scary, in my opinion, is when we look at this report from news whip, partisan publishers and political content. Everything you need to know about the state of political news across social media. The top Facebook pages for Political Content Fox news with ninety nine million engagements and occupied Democrats with ninety five million engagements. The important thing to realise is that Fox NEWS for conservative.

It's actually a news website. Fox news, dot com is considered to be widely credible by many sources though there are people on the left will accuse them of being partisan and biased. They are partisan, unbiased, but they are not fake news. Occupied Democrats, however, is considered to be absurdly fake news and don't take my word for it. We can go to pull it effect where they say occupied Democrats file and the poet effect scoreboard shows that occupy Democrats has no definitively true articles, one that they viewed as mostly true but their mostly half truth. us or even pants on fire, and if you dont trust, put a fact, we can look at news Guard NEWS Guard gives ratings to various news organisations. They say for occupied Democrats. Dotcom proceed with caution. This website generally fails to maintain basic standards of accuracy and accountability. They repeatedly published vague content. They do not gather information responsibly. They do not clarify errors, they do not handle the difference between

It was an opinion reasonably they have deceptive headlines, they do disclose ownership, they do label advertising, but they dont reveal who's in charge, including possible conflicts of interest. They do provide information about content creators. If we look at the same thing for Fox NEWS, we can see that they do get some criticism. Overwhelmingly NEWS guard says this website generally maintains basic standards of accuracy and accountability present. For me, She was rather alarming to me if you watch my second channel you'd have seen me talk a little bit about this for those that are watching now. I think it's kind of shocking that the most engaged with page by the left is a conspiracy propaganda site. That is rated to be not noble as much as Fox NEWS, is a partisan right wing site people who engage that are actually getting credible information, even if it is partisan. But let's talk. why the left may be losing the media war. According to news with the first thing to when we are looking at left versus right in terms of content production is that there are significantly more producers of right,

when content than there are of left wing content. Only eighty eight publishers are identified in our left wing category compared to three hundred fifty seven publishers for the right. I want to point out here: it's possible news. Whip just did a bad job, however news which is trying to sell it. Ology that tracks trends across social media. They use machine learning and algorithms to track down partisan content. So this is equally not the result of an individual editor, but software that attracts posts and determine who was left and who was right. We can see that the right substantially more digital outlets. Then the left they say

This category nation is based on third party definitions of political affiliation with the sites then tagged as such and our database, and we can see here top right wing publishers. The number one right wing publisher is daily wire with one hundred and thirty two million engagements, the top left wing publisher is the route with only twenty five million engagements. In fact, we have to go down to the daily collar, the fifth place, to figure out where the left would even stack up the top five positions of right wing. Publications have more individually than the top publication on the left. In fact, the daily wire has more engagements than all left wing publishers, combined, So what does this mean for the men terms? I have no idea, but the ratings for Fox NEWS our way up relative to the past few months. I've been tracking them and the rain foresee. An anonymous NBC combined can't really keep up, but it's not just about mainstream publications. It's not just about digital publications. There's also alternative sources like Youtube and vice ran this article

from last year why the right is dominating Youtube and why the left needs to own the future of online video too, is a tiny echo chamber, I'm not sure the left under stand, the monumental asked whipping being dished out to them on Youtube, thus reads: a tweet posted by Info wars editor Paul Joe. Watson who you may remember best as the right wing blogger, who it certainly promised every journalist in the world a free holiday to Sweden, as with most things Pga W does. Nowadays, the two It was immediately and widely mocked, but, however fun mocking Watson might be. There was a curious hollowness to the whole affair because on this issue, breaking the habit of a lifetime. Paul Joseph Watson is right. Now this is just an article from vice and is presumably someone's opinion. I dont know who does dominate Youtube in terms of left and right, but it really does seem to be the right, and I think this is exemplified when you look at the liked dislike ratio and comments section of basically every video when I go to Youtube channels for people like David Pachmann, they do have a lot of left

and progressive viewers. The young Turks do as well, but you'll see that a lot of conservative people will give them thumbs down, will come into the comments and start posting conservative ideas or even sometimes very far, right ideas. When you look at the ratio on far left, content is typically thumbs down across the board and when you look at conservative content is typically thumbs up. I started to wonder if this was true, because in my experience my observation shows that Youtube does tend to be conservative. I asked someone who works for Google and they told me that, yes, in their experience, working with news on Youtube independent craters tend to be either politically independent or conservative. There are very few prominent progressive channels. The exits don't get me wrong, but for the most part, the audiences and the creator, tend to be conservative. Maybe the reason we see so many conservative being censored. Band is because their substantially more of them who engage significantly more people,

or espousing leftwing values aren't as prevalent as right wing personalities. Thus we will end up seeing more rightwing personalities get banned or suspended. Now it is true. We ve heard statements from employees talking about how they do target. Servants- and it's funny to me that among the main stream personality is on the left, they say it's a conspiracy theory when we literally had Facebook admit war, censoring conservative news stories, but the fact remains that looking up at all of this, It seems like conservatives are winning now, there's prob a lot more data. I missed. These are only a few points that I've looked at. Some people probably want to contest the things that have Robin that's: that's fair this is not an exhaustive research study. I just pulled up ratings. I pulled up ratings for news websites, and I looked at an article about Youtube, doesn't mean any. This is definitively true, but we can say Fox NEWS: has more than triple

the prime time viewer ship, as of this weekend than CNN and MSNBC combined. This might mean something really profound for the mid terms. It may explain why the right has dominated all three branches of government, and it may explain why Trump is winning because whatever After doing it isn't working. I tweeted something out early about how I feel about all this, and I found that in my experience the left has no problem exercising you. I consider myself to hold a left wing values that doesn't mean I'm part of any tribal group. A lot of people say dope, don't support them. I don't. I support my personal values, but what I found is when you talk to people on the left. No one cares. You are still not left wing. If you talk to people on the right, people will accuse you of being right wing. That means politics can only flow. In one direction and as people on the left yell at me for calling out things like this for saying, hey, listen conservatives consume more news than you do. Conservatives, watching more news than you are. They get mad at me, because the left has no problem

removing me from the group. Meanwhile, conservatives are actively trying to recruit. So to me, it feels like politics is flowing straight into the terminates, I dont know what that's gonna mean for the elections. A lot of people are still saying that the Democrats are gonna, take the house and it may be true, but maybe this means something when it comes to out fund raising a political opponent. Those funds are used to hire people and to do press to buy marshals, but if conservatives watch significantly more news, that means those ideas are more likely to be shared and when it comes to engagements social media, the daily wire. has more engagements than every left. Every top left wing source combined, eliminating the commons below, will keep the conversation going. Are you feel about all this? Do you think it's true? I mean I have a lot of data here to back it up, but look this report from news.

They have numbers, it doesn't mean anything there saying is true: they're trying to market a product. I dont think they're going to lie to newsrooms. This report, I'm reading is intended to show how valuable their analytic service is. So I lean towards trusting it, but always take these things. The grain of salt as further tv ratings from ad weak. Those tend to be credible so really does seem like conservatives are dominating, but again talent below will give a conference you can follow me on Twitter at Timcast a tune, new videos, everyday at four p m, or videos on my second channel Youtube outcomes. Lashed him cast news coming up at six p m thanks, rang out and I'll see you My son.