Adam shift is being sued by watchdog group judicial watch over his failure to deliver documents on subpoenas he file where he got private phone records of a journalist. Well ass. His one has political rivals. So give a quick shut out to judicial watch for filing the suit to actually challenge what I believe to be a corrupt act. Adam shift claims he didn't actually subpoena journalists or Nunez. It was about supporting numbers, but for those at artfully with what happened. Adam shift relief a report. I should say: Thou Democrats, the intelligence Committee released report, their assessment of impeachment before I went to the Judiciary Committee in this report that private phone records of an american journalist, a private citizen of no wrong doing as well as Devon Nunez, who is Adam shifts chief political opponent in the peace process. As far as I can tell, this is an extreme abuse of power, and I get it. That's just my pain

I'll. Tell you what John Solomon, a journalist, whether you like it or not, did no raw there's no wrong doing there, there's no criminal act and even if shift accident, Italy came about the private information of this man. He should not have published it. Judicial watch wants to know what and so when they request that these documents saying that they have a right to it, it's in the public interest, it not receive them, so they are now showing ass. They are now suing Adam Shepherds What is more, the story we also have women from here. Pfizer courts are furious over the other abuses of power. So I figure, if we are to talk about what I It is one of the most agreed abuses of power. Let's talk about the five reports courts and a new Paul from us using showing most Americans think this is an abuse of power, the impeachment process and then look at some poles pertaining to the aftermath admitted things are slowing down for the holidays, but I will be here working. So, let's get started with this story from the epoch. Times judicial watch sues shift for documents related to really

of Giuliani Nunez CALL records. I do want to point one thing out: The media has smeared epoch Times, NBC News, particularly their reporting on the story the media has also claimed that judicial watches irresponsible and how they go about publishing information, though they are non profit. Yet filing requests for government documents and releasing them is what journalists are supposed to do: and when you see Busby do this, they I'll get praised, but you shall watch no. They get accused of being biased or of wrong doing the reality. Is For some reason, well, for some reason. These watchdog groups and these left wing fact checking organizations news view themselves as the default as always being correct. But if someone on the right does the exam same thing. Olives are no heavens, but let's take a look What's going on with this story, they say judicial watch that on Friday, filed a lawsuit against Rep, Adam Shift and the House Intelligence Committee for Subpoena and other documents requested by the government watchdog. The documents relate,

to the release of phone records of present Donald Trumps, personal attorney, Rudy, Giuliani, rap definition, as and other Americans. Earlier this month, The government watchdog set it filed the suit in federal court. After it received no response to a record request, sent on December six seeking all subpoenas issued by the intelligence committee on any telecommunications provider, including, but not limited to eighty anti ink for records of telephone calls of any individuals and any responses received in the course of issuing the subpoenas? Now, I'm gonna stop right here and make a point. I dont understand where the come, where the left is, where the Democrats are in complaining about the Pfizer court abuses. You know for those that are from, though, that story around seventeen accidents or mistakes. We have the fact that Carter page was actually working with the. U S government, but was accused working against the? U S: government the left used to champion challenging the security apparatus. United States challenging these powers,

but as soon as they can wield them all of a sudden moms. The word no one's has anything. Adam shift releases, the private phone records of american journalist who was done nothing wrong that the shocking to every single journalist. Yet what we hear crickets, where all of these news outlets were shocked. That Donald Trump is engaging in an attack on the free press because he insults them I'll. Tell you what the president is going to insult the press. Barack Obama insulted Fox NEWS at the end of the world. The president doesn't like that people scrutinise him Ass. The weight will always be what you'd think there would be journalists coming out, saying Adam Shift crossed the line. No, apparently not, apparently they don't care because they hate trop more than they care about the violation of civil rights. But again, let's get back to the story. Obviously I'm biased, I would be outrageous. Islands are really my private data.

When I did nothing wrong, but I guess they don't care because it's their side doing it right. They say the watchdog made request for the Democrats. Disclosed private details disclose you just a private phone call. I'm sorry private phone calls included. Of day and duration of each conversation of Nunez Republican Committee staff members to present our troops, personal, Turning including Giuliani and an investigative analysed John Solomon in their impeachment report. Their ports Dozens of call records in the April tenth twenty four timeframe, including calls between one of the president's Personal Turkey is ready, Giuliani and Nunez. The records reflect several conversations between investigative, Journalists, John Solomon and love partners and associates of do an associate of Giuliani Partners I spoke with Nunez and Giuliani the records show, The logs also feature calls between Giuliani and White House, among others what Adam she did when he published these records was essentially a guilty by association because Love Partner,

has been indicted all to do is show they talk to him and then make it. Seem like a hawk. Their includes together. That's actually what Adam she said. Now. Here's the important point, Adam Shift denied they actually subpoenaed noon. As he says, this is very important to point out. We did not subpoena Devon units call records, we did not subpoena any journalists call records, and that is simply false. Infamy and being pushed by the president's allies. No, you did subpoena. There call records because you targeted phone numbers that got their call records. I get. It will place him ex. They didn't look up the named John Solomon and then say give me a foreigner gets no, they had phone numbers and they said. Let me get the records of these phone numbers and perhaps the phone numbers were of love partners, but the reality is

as far as I know, they didn't know whose phone records these actually war, but, more importantly, a mocking, take Adam shifts word for it to Digital Watch requested these documents. Adam shift should supply them. Thus he is being sued. I don't care who you are. I don't care for republican or a Democrat. If you're going to abuse the system in this way and not be surprised when someone files request for documents in ensues, you may say today Watch argued in their court filing that was critically important to seek the records because the committee subpoenas were issued without any lawful basis and violated the rights of numerous private citizens. It added at obtaining the request wreck requested records would provide the public information about how this happiness were issued, quote Adam Shift, abused his power to secretly subpoena and then publish the private phone records in potential violation of the law of innocent Americans. What else is MR ship hiding? Perhaps nothing brats ship is on the level. However, as a public official, I believe it's bears a few me

right, we have a right to know how it came to be that a government actor with four no legislative reason is an investigative reason, not a legislative reason, subpoenaed the phone records of private citizens and public now get out, and I tell you this too. If your argument is that ship has a right to do it, why did he publish them If he's gonna argue, I didn't actually subpoena records of a journalist. Why did you publish them? It doesn't make sense. He says this is confident shift and his committee ran roughshod over the rule of law in pursuit of the abusive and each impeachment of President Trump, this loss. It serves as a reminder that congressmen, shit congressmen shift Congress are not above the law. They say the Democrats move to disclose the deed a phone calls received widespread criticism because the phone conversations working sensitive in particular Nunez his phone records noon, is the ranking member of the House Intelligence Committee. In a statement, Nunez called the Democrats move a gross abuse of power, but added

that was characteristic of the way ship has run. The impeachment inquiry he's needed going to need a long rehabilitation period when this is Nunez said shifts. Communication director did not immediately responded to request for comment. Well, look shift and others have been accused of abuses. Our I say this not because I actually you know I will hold on. I think he did abuses power. I think Trump didn't, although I think Trump is arrogant and he what I think what you did was was borne out in appropriate as more details command I'm beginning to think it's a whole lot of nothing, but when it comes to Ukraine but they want to sling modern, say tromp abuses, power will shift literally, did you can't as a government act or just go and dig up private information on people and publish it? no reason, no criminal wrong, doing nothing just for political expediency that needs to be called out. Well, they ve been calling it up Republican, say Adam Shifts Smear Devon, Nunez and reporting on someone This story from the earlier in the month, but here's what I find so funny they live in a story from

Fox NEWS, Adam shifts as it's hard to be sympathetic to Carter page amid Pfizer abuse revelations. Well, I think it's hard for him to be sympathetic to Carter page because he'd literally abuses, people's privacy rights much in a similar way. Carter pages rights were abused when it comes to Pfizer now, Adam Shift says: oh it's because Carter page lied in reality. For those I dont know, Carter Pay each was actually providing information to the CIA. That's the big controversy here. The FBI I got a subpoena against him accusing moving a foreign agent when in fact he was helping America and to turn to rest muse, and, although I do think its a bit unfair to use a single, all, especially for my muse, and who have been accused of being biased. What the president, I will say this I'll use the pole I it's interesting take it with a brain assault because of the existence of biased, but I will counter

I sang Rasmussen was actually very accurate in there pulling assessment for twenty sixteen, so some people don't like them, because their ports and to favour the present, it doesn't mean they're wrong and here's what they find. Fifty one percent agree. Impeachment is abuse of power by Democrats. So I know we started with chef he's being sued. I think that's the most important bit of information here, but move on, we can see that there is concern among a widespread portion of the population and the Democrats are abusing their power. I mean you look at what happened with the FBI and the fine Pfizer and Russia gaping investigation things. The Democrats. Wanted and then and the media we were cheerleading, turned out to be fake and now we're dealing with Ukraine, Gate and we're dealing with, you know publishing of private firm record's. I think we are seeing substantial abuse of power, but it's not just mean recipes and finds many people a great check it out. I say this: the latest recipes report

ports. National telephone and online survey finds at fifty one percent of likely. U S. Voters agree with trumps statement in a letter to the. U S house of representatives before the vote quote. This impeachment represents an unprecedented and unconstitutional abuse of power by democratic I'll makers, unequalled in nearly two and a half centuries american legislative history. Similarly, forty eight percent agree with how Speaker Nancy Policy when she said our democracy is what is at stake. The present, engaged in an abuse of power, undermining our national security and jeopardizing the integrity of our elections.

They say nearly as money. Forty six percent disagree with policy comparative forty percent. We disagree with drop. It is important to note that rest Musin reports did not identify the source of the statement in either question now. This is good news for the president that the slight majority believes the Democrats are abusing their power and I think that's why they highlighted they didn't tell people. It was Trump who said this, but in the end we can see there's still a very divided population. Around half of all people, you know pulled. Think Nancy. Blowsy is right that trump abuse this power and slightly more believe that it's the Democrats abusing their power. The reason this is significant, noting again recipes intends to be favourable to the present. Take with great assault is that poles have been flipping in favour of trump, since the impeachment process started. The reason why

I think this is likely to be accurate is because we can see from the real clear politics average. Most Americans now oppose the impeachment and removal of President Donald Trump. So, even though this is just rest museum, I know not an aggregate. It stands to reason that with I'll swing, this direction, there's probably going to be a lot of Americans who think the Democrats are abusing their power, and you know what even the Pfizer courts are now furious. Over what happened a magazine, play game and say that the FBI and Democrats Walkin Lops lockstep. I think it's fair to point out this. Probably a lot of FBI agents who, like Trump as a culture war, but also fair to point out Democrats, championed the abuse of power by the FBI. They abused power themselves and Adam shift. Case, and now you are of the view that the media on their side the whole time Pfizer Court investigating F B, I warrant applications.

The foreign intelligent Surveillance ACT, court that approved FBI surveillance of former Trump Campaign AID Carter Page is now investigating other applications. Its received from one of the agency's attorneys accused of making an inappropriate change to the page. Location the review, which is announced in an order released Friday, hens that a comprehensive effort by the secretive court to read evaluate surveillance. After the Justice Department, Inspector General report found errors in the page application process. I am not going to tell you it's happening you know the wrong Paul me more. It's happening in those flesh, colored unlock. I tell you that I'm not gonna pretend like this is the first no moment and were now seeing the floodgates open and oh, oh bombers, gonna get busted. I don't think that's what's gonna happen. Nor do I think over almost nearly involved as many people think he is they bore. Seeing is that there are some things coming up. You know what the Idee report it wasn't as big as many people on the right. We're expecting it to be, but we still big enough, even James call me had to command admitted them.

You're not coming up in it and admitting there was Pfizer abuse and they mocked avenues when the five abuse was was first reported on one other forced to admit it is the biggest I'm John the world. Nobody is, it is fairly decent. Now we turned to the Durham investigation. John Durham is doing the restoration of the origins of the Russia Gate, collusion narrative, the hopes as tromp calls it and its expanded to criminal probe. Many people are putting their hopes in this, but I get your warning if your trop supporter, you know I'll, tell you this With a smaller investigation, every Democrat every person in the media This was gonna, be it oh. This is exam what we need once the Mulder Report comes up, we're gonna know for sure, and then you Rachel, almost crying now she denies it, but it looked like she was on the verge of tears when it turned out sorry Trump didn't colluded with Russia. That's fake news! Salty! This! You may hear the news about Durham and its true. The left has been wrong on many of these issues as possible. You not considering the right has been more likely.

Correct that there is something big coming from the Durham investigation. I think we'll see something but they weren't a sea. Whatever one expects to see, I don't think we're gonna see a grand exposure of this deep state conspiracy. I think there will be some people will build accountable by think it'll, mostly just be a blip something for the history books for sure, but I'm not willing to bet that we're going to see the floodgates open up and then you know purple, I don't think so. Now there have their. There have been some pretty interesting stories as one story right now, maybe I'll get to a later today about a former FBI agent who actually illegally access the email account of Jack Bergmann over trying to you know somebody with Robert Mauler, and so we have seen some weird things pop up, but look away, see you, you know Hillary Clinton inherent gossip. I don't think so. Now we're going to see you know, Obama being scrutinised in the press. Of course we won't. I just don't. I don't think it's going to happen so this video may end up being a little bit shorter will see. We get to set up a rapid up here by saying, with with one last little little bit here what

What I have for you today is just the current president: Trump job approval ratings and it just keeps going up now. Look it went down when the impeachment process started that will, for whatever reason and slowly recovered their. And I wanted to highlight this- is amid all of the allegations of abuse with this Paul from ass musin. We have a lot of people saying that Donald Trump approval rating today is higher than where Obama's was and the reason is important- is that even in the face of these these allegations impeachment, this conflict were seeing I think, there's more reasons to suggest that Trump is on track right, twenty victory. If Barack Obama was pulling less than from, if trumps approval writing as recovery, and I think it stands to reason that if Brok of Alma was re elected, you know Tropic some in in a similar position, noting that, outside of all of you,

is at an end and here's where I bring this up, I want to make sure I can. I can connect this appropriately for you, because the abuse is giving credence to claims made by Trump its vindicating some of what Europe has been saying for a long time and its lending itself to the fact that, yes, maybe Democrats are abusing their power. Yes, maybe Parliament is an abuse of power. The Mahler investigations are nothing barber, and now perhaps Trump is correct, and that's why approval writing is go up. Is going up, people don't care anymore. But I want to base our to show you something it's true. According to gallop at the same time in an open Most presidency, he was actually below where Donald Trump yesterday Gallop has Donald Trump at forty five percent and Barack Obama was at between forty about forty three to forty two percent, so Trump was higher, but now, if you look at this graphic, isn't important. It's only up to this point, so I want to make sure it's clear. You know we can.

Go back in time to do you know of a few months ago I went into the Obama has consistently been above Trump in need in the same point as presidency, but Obama wasn't facing the scrutiny, the scandals, the reason this is important when you see that tromp was right or the Republicans were right about Pfizer abuse. When you say that Adam ship is being sued, you can see that they are, pulling out all the stops to go after tramping shutting down, and even amid these allegations, the media still points the finger at tromp yet for some reason, Trump is now doing slightly better than Obama in the polls. According to gallop that says to me, trumps approval ratings probably actually much much higher than the polls show, because all of the negative press and all of the abuse and all of the weight being thrown at Donald Trump probably holds him back. So if you were to get rid of this stuff, if you're too look what's going on Pfizer courts,

and you're looking at him. She is doing and sort of indication that Europe is experiencing. I think stance reason if all that was gone, trumps approval rate would be much higher than Obama's. However, I am not one to prefer singular poles. So, I saw this claim that Trump has now surpassed Barack Obama. I said ok, but let's, let's do it an aggregate comparison and according to real clear path, six. No, it isn't really. It doesn't really come close in the aggregate. There has been a bit of a back and forth between trumpet Obama. So if we're gonna be fair and only its fair to say that today, but Donald Trump is beating brought, Obama, from where he was rising, it's fair to fair to say that Obama saw massive downturn around the same time. An trump has surpassed him at various moments, but it's a bit of. Fourth, it's not fair to say in my opinion, that Trump is beating Obama. But that no I mean tromp has remained stable, What really saying is that a certain point in Obama's presidency, his approval ratings to drop by a lot Donald Trump approval rating has

we ve been fairly stagnant and it's an assembly a good or a bad thing. We drop in and recover a drop in and recover and then that just kind of spikes up and down- that's true for many other presidents. I think, what's really significant here- is that Donald Trump has been fighting a negative portrayal from the press for so long that we're seeing as approval writing slowly climb where the inverse was true for burma- who had actually a lot of positive press coverage or, I should say, substantially less negative coverage and if we go back ok now it's not gonna load. If we go, you can actually did. Obama was going down over time so think about that. It's an inversion, overtime, Obama's approval writing dropped from around sixty five per and floating down towards at now being around even with Trump. If you want to make a gamble, you could say: maybe it's a mirror

and now we're gonna see trumps approval ratings are going up a lot more, especially when the term report comes out with the Pfizer abuse allegations. Maybe trump peoples are you know thinking? Well, actually let me stop you gotta admit what do you like the guy or not comes got an attitude problem? You does Some people like the fact that his boastful an arrogant and you know a nasty- do common horse face, but that's gonna, that's gonna play against them, but what I think it is fair to say that I bought for whatever reason, why not stop and say this in all bombers. Presidency was very different from from trumps, but the main take away from this is that about I saw a massive downturn and Trump actually saw pretty stable number. So I don't think it's necessarily that significant, but I do think it lends itself to say for another reason, you know: jumps gonna, be reelected I'll leave their stick around a lot more segments coming up at Youtube COM slashed him cast news, starting at six p m. You do. I just want you to get those nice rang out. I will see you all there.

One of powerful tools and the twenty sixteen election were means used by Trump supporters to convey ideas in concise and enjoyable ways and that allowed certain ideas to propagate well now we are seeing that Instagram facts checking programme is killing means. Now you can think All the conspiracy theories you like about how they're coming for our means shut it down, because people are using its broad messages, but I think saying something: much more dangerous theirs. Misunderstanding as to what facts and truth really really are. But also what we're see from this fact checking of names they really believe everyone is stupid and this might actually prove that there are too many stupid people and that, I dont know how to solve so here's what I wanna do for this morning segment. I, what I'll show what's going on with means gotta do this. You can clearly see that many of these means our political

being sad to be fake, its fake news. Yet there jokes, we understand their. What you want. I want to show you. You see the daily wire recently, God, downgraded by news guard for those an art familiar news Guard is a third party extension and it's a group of journalists company and they basically facts. News organisations determine whether or not they are credible. Will it anyway got downgraded, but Buzzfeed New, Who is is perfect across the board? I dont completely disagree. But I want to prove to you how the establishment doesn't actually have. On their side they claim to because they don't actually do the work to figure out. What's real or not, the end result is that Third party fact checking organizations hired by companies like Facebook or not hired, but given the keys to the castle who then common, and so your means are fake or

your news is fake, even when they themselves publish contradictory information. First, here's what they say over reclaim that which mind you is not raided by news guard. Instagram was once the best place best places for sharing and enjoying means. However, earlier this year, Instagram Mass purged over thirty popular mean pages. And reduce the circulation of means on the platform now at the recent mass roll out of its fact checking programme. Instagram has started to slowly kill off the remaining means by hiding. Many of them are behind a false information notice, as reported previously this missed, this notice was used to censor a meme of climate activist Gretta tune which shows are eating on a train well, hungry african children look out from up for look, look on from outside the train window. It I'm sorry if, if some

You can't tell this border was fake. We ve got different problems just because people don't realize it's obviously fake and she's, not writing a train through an african village. Ok, you can't sensor block it or tell like declared their seriously backtracking jokes at this point. What what are we supposed to? Do? We get make a joke, because some people, too stupid, aroused a joke. I dont know what to tell you man, but I will point while we're here have you noticed Mr Byrne, the climate change activist, using single use, plastic bins and single use plastic bags and say that that was paper anyway, I'm being a bit of a jerk on this one. They say, however, this tune. Burg name is just one of many that has been fact checked, blurred out and hidden behind a notice on Instagram. Since the programme was in used December eighteenth. Now, if I interesting, but I do have something scarier for

Let me show you some these images. What you can see here is that this person, lush socks on Instagram posted a meme, is blocked. It is Lord out and its as false information reviewed by independent fact, checkers and the reason is They say there is no evidence that Hillary Clinton killed Jeffrey Epstein. Why? Because it was a joke, it was a joke, says I killed Saddam Hussein, but oh Mamma says I killed someone. Lawton then Trot says I killed by daddy and then everyone says she killed Epstein joke. If aha, they actually blurred that out their fact checking jokes, as you know, I don't know man, I'm sure something but will say it's because they know that these means make people laugh and it creates an inn group of people more likely to support now trump but let me show you how this becomes more nefarious. Take a look at this post. This supposed that

So what you're? Seeing as a test post I made on November eighteenth, where I basically copied what Prager University I posted Facebook. Prager you as a conservative, you two general on, and they do Instagram and tunnel media. They Prager you posted on Twitter. Did you know and a thousand six Hillary Clinton voted for a fence on the mexican border, so did Barack Obama an chuck humor and twenty three other Democrats. Now a border wall is considered racist. Why is the left? it did so far on the issue of immigration, so I basically took what they said and as a test repose, because here's what happened when Prager you posted this image, it was it was blurred out. Let me show what it looks like you can see partly false information, so you can't actually read what they said, The average person will see then say: woe fake news right,

The reality is. It was completely true information when they fact checked Prager, you undermine their post, the link to a story from political fact that says: half true did top Democrats vote for a border wall in two thousand sets hold on a second. Why would Facebook link a story? asking whether they voted for border wall if Prager use that they voted for border fence the different things now you might be. And playing semantics. We know programme was wrong. Actually not true the political fact article that was linked, actually says they voted for a border fence unfortunate. I guess for the facts. Workers over at Facebook Prager, you was being bit concise. There are saying they voted for fats, so wise a wall racist like if, if the argument is a fence, isn't racist, what makes a wall racist, legitimate question, so I posted this. This post is part of a test and will quote Prager. You so tell us why a border wall is now racist. I posted the

source everything in the Prager you, a statement from Twitter was sourced by pilot affect guess what happened. Facebook actually took down this path as they they said, of blocked at the soft answered it. Putting up an image saying this is false information on my post, even though any clue. The source their own. Source which confirms all of that information, Where becomes dangerous, when we have fact checkers trying to determine what is true, what isn't because the fact checkers our justice? bad as any other person. More importantly, I mean, if only to make a joke in fact jacket. We got serious problems so You know some people might say it's politically biased and politically motivated, and I think it's not so much of the system was built to be biased, but that these journalists are in fact biased, and I can prove it and I'm gonna take some swipes at you. News guard because you'll make too many mistakes now. First, let me stop the Mattel everybody

I only use news guard approved sources with rare exception. There may be an outlet with a star where are those verifiable and because of the original source I'll use it. A typical. When I do also keeping in mind- whose guard rates this negatively. The reason I do this is because, if the biased left Journalists are saying this sources credible? Well, then, you can't get mad at me for using them because they have in the past. News guards, as Fox NEWS is credible. The daily cholera, Credible the daily mail is credible. I make sure that, if, if and when news, it takes some one off their credibility. Lest I stop using them when I recognise news garters wrong, it's kind of a ok here's, where put it you're journalists are biased. So if I use your biased external and find information that makes that that proves. You know certain things you can't accused me of pushing lies, can where's theories because I'm using same journalists. Everybody else's right, take us out. We can see,

whose guard recently down rank the daily wire. They did an upper limit. You can see here. It says does not repeatedly publish false content, but when it I'm still gathering and providing information responsibly, correcting clarifying errors, handling their fingers and opinions. Possibly avoiding deceptive headline. Just causing ownership and revealing was in charge. They get access across the board which gives the site a red exclamation point meaning proceed with caution, this website severely violates basic standards of credibility and transparency, the daily, the daily wire. I would, I would say this is an absolutely incorrect assessment of the daily wire, but you know what, for the sake of of airing on the side of, you can't call me wrong if I'm using your sources, I have now phased out using daily wire for my four for my videos, so that a liar you may be what about this in my own region. But let me show you this actually thing. The daily wire tends to be credible. There are some heavy criticisms. Absolutely in agreement with what from news guard. So they said this at the bottom.

Following a new review of content on daily were actually that's all. I'm sorry. If not familiar, the daily wire is Ben ship euros, news outlets, its primarily a commentator and conservative aggregation of news, this it is falling A new review of content on daily Wire NEWS Guard opted in this matter, label, on December, seventeenth twenty nineteen to reflect its determination that, contrary to an earlier version, this label daily wired. I'm fails to meet new scarred standard for gathering embers, ending information responsibly for avoiding deceptive headlines and for clearly revealing who's in charge. Now I want to show you why I could compiler. Of why news guard itself is not credible as much as I do use it right, fork, sort of a political argument. They say: that's right here does not repeatedly publish false content thumbs up green checkmark.

Ok, thank you that thank you bank, that union's God for letting me now that there are severe issues with with daily wire, but at least are not publishing false content right. Actually, they say this credibility. However, the daily, why are frequently publishes false and misleading information? Ok hold on You told me they don't do that and then in your own content about it, you say they do do that. I got a contradiction here. News guard has made a factual error. I'm sorry, This is evidence that news garters published false content, and I can also show you that news guard also publishes more false content, which would stand to reason new start itself would receive a red exclamation point for not being credible because they repeatedly publish false information. The point here is- and I am being a bit hyper, Balikh or sarcastic-

sense, but if they, if they say they both simultaneously doing don't, publish false content, then clearly something is incorrectly and they published on the false. Let me show you this Buzzfeed NEWS was the news. According to news, guard is cleared across the board as credible does not publish false content is get gather, information responsibility responsibly, this one handles the difference between news and opinion responsibly thumbs up good job news guard fantastic, Thank you for letting me know that little that that ninety percent of the opinion pieces that appear on Busby NEWS are, in fact not opinion. Even it didn't label them, you see the problem, is that news Guard says: Buzzfeed handles the difference between a penny. And news responsibly. In fact, they do not they, literally don't that is false and I can prove it simply look at the headline story as of today San Francisco spent a decade being rich, important and hating itself. That headlines

literally in opinion hating itself as a fact that someone's opinion, whether or not a city hates itself, but guess what we cannot. But the story, it doesn't say, opinion it's as Buzzfeed, quarter, are passing us off like it's a straight up news article. If it is tech, it's not an opinion. It's not listed as an opinion. It's listed as a fact and if we go back page we can see. There are several opinion pieces that are not labelled as opinion because Buzzfeed, as far as I can tell, does not have that distinction. So. Why are we trusting our content to Third party fact checkers, so and photo stories that will challenge your view of the world. That's an opinion. I get it. It's Buzzfeed click bait. The pointers Buzzfeed gets a green checkmark across the board when they was fake news and I'm really gonna Hamerton this one's. For you Guard buzz news, dot com they going to talk about how Buzzfeed reporting on

The Mulder report was unparalleled. Listen, I'm excise on Europe problem is dispatching organisations if you use Buzzfeed as these standard for what is true, then You will find conservative ballots are fake news because you can say: hey butt. Speed says you know one plus one was three but the Federalist says one plus when he calls to wheel. Buzzfeed news is more credible. Therefore, Federalist is wrong. How'd, you determine what is a fact. If we're trying to way every news organization against source material. You see the point if Buzzfeed comes out with fake news and they do all the time, why would they be considered to not repeatedly publish false content? What is their criteria for it for what it? What qualifies as repeatedly on excise on must be published. A story are early this year about Robert Mahler sang the mother. I have ever that the exact details, but it was the right one of the rare moments at the Mullah team and Robert

himself came out said. The story is not true: Buzzfeed stood by their reporting. Ends up done the same thing. Why would we, and consider Busby to be credible when The source of the story says fake news. Don't ask me news guard just determines that their green across the board, even though they don't differentiate between news and opinion. What makes Buzzfeed news I have no idea and my understanding as in the past, they actually if Buzzfeed an ax for differentiating between there's an opinion, but now, I want to really drive the sound, because I can give you fake news from Buzzfeed more recently announced and I'll tell you what man I'm actually on the verge of getting. I talked about what we're working on expanding suffers and there is a plan for an external fact checking entity, that's going rate, will basically what particular randomly sample hundred articles will fact check them. Right now,

and then do a writing based on that complicated and we ve been even you know it's on the back burner, but on its it's on the list of things you plan to do legitimate faction anyway, soothe me, I'm gonna Fraga, my throat, let me show you the story. Buzzfeed NEWS reported last month, a man was stabbed to death in a fight over a Popeye's chicken sandwich that Line is literally fake. The story is made up. Buzzfeed made this up. As a real journalist. You would actually go and talk two witnesses and family members determine what really happened in this fight and, as it turns out the fairest assessing. Of what this story was. Was that too, that several people were at a Popeye's and it may have had two main had to do with the fact that Popeye's had released chicken sandwich? However, a fight broke out, for someone cutting in front of other people. Some guys I've taken outside the other guy pulled out a knife and stabbed either guy. They were not fair.

Over a chicken sandwich. There was no shortage of which it can sandwich. Anybody could have got a chicken sandwich and a family member said he did not die fighting for chicken sandwich buzz feed want. To publish a sensationalize, hyperbolic fake news headline do get clicks because apparently Buzzfeed thinks it's funny, or something or interesting or click baby, to make a story about two. As part of the funding to the death over chicken. This story particularly, was offensive to me it because it is somebody most agreed fake news with our but it also combines the left's penchant for taking rate put forward bending not to be racist but pushing the most racist concepts you ve ever imagine buzz. Literally wrote a story that is fake, arguing that two black men fought to the death over fried chicken. That is fake news. It is fake as it comes, and it is racist

and I am disgusted by yet Buzzfeed for some reason is told we were told there completely credible salt Thus, the daily wire is not perfect, their mostly commentary. It is a critic. Conservatives have received for a long time there. What relative to the to the left, conservative don't do journalism, they dont do on the ground, reporting the aggregate and they do commentary daily why're. You can criticise for this, but you know what honestly, the daily wire is allowed to create a conservative commentary website and that should be considered when you're checking whether or not their credible some of the. Articles that are right, it is false, are just hyperbole, it's not fake. It's just a conservative. You know we're being hyperbolic, like everybody does but I'll MSNBC is MSNBC you're gonna get right, it is false. Rather lies they pushed for Rachel. Now talking about Fargo

winter and Russia shutting off the power they don't. So here's an answer. Patenting the default for these fashioning agencies is the left. So Buzzfeed NEWS can publish repeated false information, but because the default is the left is correct, they say, but we must be credible. They dont repute repeated repeatedly, publish false content, but I'll tell you what I'd be willing to bet. You give me a few days: and I can pull up a list of dozens of stories that are fake from Busby, especially when it comes to the culture. Worse, there repeat their repeated articles from Buzzfeed pertaining to count Dracula. Sargon that are so insanely misleading or false. For some reason, news guards like you must be joking, even other. Basically, the entire front page of the website is unlabelled opinions. Ok, maybe that's that's exaggerating right, but but seriously there's tons

the falsely frame stories, misleading headlines and opinions that are labelled as such and that's credible, but when daily Wired does essentially the same thing. They give him red x across the board and even contradict themselves. I'll, tell you what I know. A lot of people say why You bother using news, Guard TIM, their biased and they have no credibility right. I agree, but I'll tell you this when I hope, a story from CNN. That says Something like you know how, but this thereby, I believe to see it and pulls recently showing that impeachment has, as is now failing opposition to impatient. You can't tell me I'm wrong if I'm using, Cnn written are rated as credible by biased left wing outlets and it saying Trump as winning. Therein lies the big challenge for those who hate watching my video. The left they do want to do it. I've seen the comments there. I refuse to watch propaganda. Oh I'm! Sorry, I'm

getting Sienna? Oh, you thinks you announced propaganda they're, the ones who hate Trump and there the one saying Trump is winning. So therein lies the big problem, we'll take it back to the means means or jokes fact: checkers are now step in an removing obvious jocks one at removing but censoring them making it harder to see harder to share and negatively impact on people who make jokes? This is the world is being developed, biased, ignorant fact checkers, who can't tell what a joke is and are trying to protect people who, and from jokes, but when it comes to the actual facts, when it comes to what we really need to know about the default is left. I ask you this: why should Buzzfeed get green asked the board must reach it. Have several axes avoids deceptive headlines. Are you kidding me a man was stabbed death in a fight over a Popeye's chicken sandwich is fake news. You know an ominous, in this spirit and whose guard

because your are biased to such an absurd degree, and you probably don't realize it, but I'll tell you this right now, If Robert Mahler comes out and says Buzz, feed is fake news. Well, then We have to decide who is telling the truth or not, and if Buzzfeed does fake trash like this, when fan, we members even say it's not true. You have a serious problem. Now, look a wrap this up and say this some of the criticisms news guard has for daily wire there actually on point the problem I have is not that there saying daily work: your publishes, fat content daily wire has published hyperbolic, falsely frame door. Exaggerate content totally think they have. Slowly, but buzz feed literally does the same thing. The difference, Buzzfeed prick tens, it's better reporting Buzzfeed doesn't use commentary style, they make things, look like their reporting when, in fact their falsely framing stories case in point, a man was fighting over fried chicken fake

news. You know I just really bothers me. I'm from Chicago I've seen senseless violence. I grew up with. That's a senseless violence all around me and they never care to come to our neighbourhoods, and People would actually going on in why this look at this happens. We don't do it, but I'll tell you what if Buzzfeed can find a holy, Obviously, racist narrative about black men fighting to the death of a fried chicken, you better, damn well believe they're, going to publish that fake news fake headline and when I'm message, Ben Smithy editor he stood by it. He stood by fake bs. Get me all riled up, so you know what that is what it is. I live. There stick around next segments coming up at one p m youtube com slashed him cast: and I will see you- then them I've gotta, give credit to progressives far leftists and socialists who have recently come out questioning impeachment and doing it. In my opinion, in the Right

you see, I wouldn't let me say one thing before we get started. I have no problem with you if you're communist, so long as you're principled, argued in good faith and we will debate policy, practical application of economics and ultimately I will disagree with you, but I think, if you're being polite respecting me, I guess democratic institutions, anti authoritarianism But I have no problem haven't conversation. I was in Berkeley met a communist, tending literature and I asked them we thought about anti FA and he said their bad because their violent and their hurting people- and I was like one- hey man by all means be a communist wave, your flag and if you're talking about you know actually argue in debating ideas may only be with you is that I think your opinion is bad and I think conservative bad opinions to its the authoritarian. It's the lies. Its duplicitous ness deceit, the media. All of these things are bats. I'll. Tell you this right! Now: Genk Huger of the young Turks he's running for Congress. I really disagree with a guy in a lot of issues, but the meat

is lying about in their smearing him and I think that's wrong, so actually defended the guy, more importantly than his tweet about Nancy plus you, which I like, is this article from Jacobin which is basically social, I'm pretty sure it socialists right and I want to. I don't wanna, you know be wrong or to say As far as I know, it is a very socialist publication. What's the point of impeachment, I gotta headed to I will. I will give a clap and respect Jacob in because they made the correct point. Donald Trump is not being impeached because he did something wrong seriously. They actually argue Donald Trump has not been paid for doing something wrong. It's not first policy if not for immigration, it's not for strippers or any kind of bad behaviour. Jacob in says, rightly so. Donald Trump is being impeached because the offended the delicate sensibilities of establishment Democrats by going after one of their own, they don't care. If Trump does things wrong, they don't care of. His policy are bad there, mad that he question

Joe Biden. That's the issue. I love it. I love is not necessarily honestly that I completely agree with everything there saying what's really important point. Say this: if Donald Trump truly abused his power was it not, a commando raids in Yemen, which resulted in the loss of life a little of a little girl on american girl and, if ass, the case Obama also abuses power in doing very similar things. I think the better question about abuse of power, or is firing Tomahawk missiles into Syria? Whether or not you ve correctional approval to do so? Hey I'll, throw call back to a bomb and George W Bush on those same issues, but there are impeding, but then that they're not impeaching Trump or that there are peaches trump because he dared to question the shady dealings of Joe Biden. How dare you? How dare you come our secretive club of Ivory Tower elites. Now that is an impossible events, but let me start with Genk. You give the young Turks who has a tweet. I completely agree with Jack said:

incredible how much the national media gaslights us into thinking. Pelosi is com don't let alone a master legislator. She's making major mistake. By holding up the impeachment articles, optics are terrible, and she has no leverage and doesn't seem to understand that send it. I completely agree: let's get on with things Nancy Plus? He is doing nothing and yet For some reason, the establishment wants a pretend like she's, some, our mastermind am in agreement of junk. You give young Turks where we disagree on policy and whether not trompe l b ultimately be impeached are different thing, But I can respect this, but when I saw this article from Jacobson, I couldn't help would say You know what you're right, if you think Trump abusers power, wouldn't you talk about things is actually done instead of a phone call, apparently not because the Democrats best case is that he didn't answer subpoenas. You eat. You told his staff not to answer subpoenas. Ok, take over the court's workers posted

then even do that as any abuse of power. Are you kidding me for having a phone call and saying something potentially inappropriate? That's it and Jacob in being far left. They really don't like tromp. They got tedious across the board, but I think they're pointed out they say you know. Tromp was caging, kids and all these things and listen. You know what I'm not super far left, so I think there's an argument argument to be had with far leftists about practical application of Executive authority. I'm fine by that ultimately, though, I think tromp skirts by because the executive branch has too much power and ass. It was before I actually think, there's a light. You know an open window in what's happened trump in that it is good to see executive authority scrutinised to such an extreme degree, because it will come back a Democrats and I'm gonna like

the executive branch has been gained way too much power for wait too long. So you know what my bigger problem is with the deceit, the lies and how the Democrats don't actually care about what is right or wrong what they really care about. Is that will Joe Biden one of them and trumped up at one of their own, so they're gonna pull out all the stops to go after him, ignoring all of the policy things that could actually argue on us read the story: what's the point of impeachment rights, Jacob in getting rid of trump would be great, but Congress isn't going to do it. We actually have to vote him out. I agree with that. If you want to get rid of trompe gotta vote and impeachment a therapeutic ritual for MSNBC hosts and an act of school or settling by the national security state isn't helping. I completely agree that is that that is so apt and I am glad to see you know what you're not really warms my heart. What's the most incredible thing about impeachment, right now is that we are seeing the far left and concern

lives and even moderates holding hands and singing songs under a rainbow in agreement that the establishment media on the crony Democrats and unless NBC, else. House are complete. Trash now come on. I get it Jacob, probably degree product Jacob improbably disagrees, eighty percent of my opinions in my political views. But if we can come together under under something other things we do it. Like I'm gonna tell you what men Jacob been spot on when they say that impeachment, as a therapeutic ritual for Amazon BC, hosts an active score settling by security state. It's not helping job. It's literally, not anything. So I have a say in the whole time, so some people believe is where Mention to my video, the dimensional. The real point of impeachment is not about tromp it's to stop Bernie Sanders. Because Bernie Sanders now that their withholding the impeachment articles, if they don't push them,

throw until I January and the trial happens in February. In burning its recall, you can't campaign before Super Tuesday, but guess who can job. So why are they? Basically say you know this, they say essentially what I said keeping in mind. This is Jacob S right, socialists. They say this leaving aside constitution, because it's part of the problem Trump wouldn't be president. Were it not for mere unalterable relic of slavery days. The electoral college. Well, I disagree with with them on the constitutional council shows great because it does get amended, but they say this yes, Trump is awful and would be a blessing to be rid of him he's a big it Griffith her and it would be a thought. Carrion, but impeaching him less than a year before the election is not the answer to much of anything. It's a distraction from ejecting him from the most definitively possible beating him decisively and election. Yes, yes, this this, the Democrats could have been kept. Painting on issues that could have been talking about what Jacob in is talking about, not that

think I wanna certainly win by things. The right move, I think its principal it's the move with integrity, not some foe, impeachment attempt here's here's the best part. Its telling that Joe Biden is named in the articles of impeachment for the democratic leadership, trumps worst offences, the catching of children, the apologize for Nazis, the feel tee to asset strippers plutocrats, the endless vulgarity or unpleasant, but not fatal. Despite all of those offences, they didn't begrudge him and extension of the Patriot ACT. Which is a funny set of powers to grant someone to Sup too, to grant a someone so awful. What really set Nancy Policy at all off was the alleged conspiring against one of their own reported by CIA officer Eric, and it gets his name on you to someone who worked closely with your bomb administration. Dams want to keep his name out of it, but is it knowing but is it knowing ones accuser, a cornerstone of american law? Woe

the socialists agree that tromp has a right to confront these accuser. I have great. I have great respect for a lot of organs that they're making. Now I disagree with the framing of the apologies for Nazis and feel fielded added shippers and things like that, but I think the point actually has merit that if you really as a Democrat were offended by trumpet thought, Tromp was all of these things. Wouldn't you target him this way with your campaigning and set up some fake impeachment, but most of us think about the remedy for moving the president as much as they all believe. The orange man is the worst possible thing on the planet: Orangemen bad, even Jacob, and thinks you know trumpets the worse, the worst. The Democrats, only a couple tried to remove him for bad tweets. The actual movement with mass support from the Democrats to get rid of tromp was because he challenged Joe Biden. Think about it

the Democrats, really care about what Trop says. No, of course not trunk and sail the worth words in the world. They don't care now the voters care right and left the left us, the socialists in the voters. They don't like what Europe is doing. The Democrats are playing a game. There establishment they want to win and they want the same powers that I want to challenge the power. But when Trump science says borne by the way, Joe Biden, olives and gas heavens. We must stop at nothing to remove Donald Trump because he dared challenge vital, but they do to Barney. Sanders is really funny when the Dnc cheated the primary process, robbed from Sanders where, whereas the outrage of the Democrats, while there was totally gabert who step down and refuse to endorse Hillary Clinton, and you see what the media does to her after the fact. So we can see. The issue is whether trap is a good or bad person, not at all that this, the establishment Democrats dont care.

Air, one that I really do want to read out. What will keep on real that more. But I really really do just love they. They call Adam ship a tool and I'm like yes, absolutely man. I think what we're really seeing is establishment versus populist or your person of the people. Do you suppose the the abuse of power and things like this and trumpet innocent actor, but Trump is an anti establishment. You know leading the populist right for all his faults. He still stands apart from the circuit from a security state and and the democratic establishment, and even the republican establishment they ate him trumps changed. Everything took us up aside from the offence against Biden. Trump has seriously disrespected not only the CIA, but also NATO

much up much to the distress of national security tools like Adam Schiff. Yes, these are the least of trumps offences, but there what really move the party leadership MAX thinks we can hijacked the process for our own purposes, whatever those may be, but a Nancy policy, that would doubtless be just another green dream or whenever I have never understood the point of impeachment from the from the first. Even when it's a cause being pushed by the Claude, whom I otherwise admire a lot. I dont admire the squad a lot and I also don't and understand the point of impeachment, because a lot of reasons why it may or may not being have be happening whatever its origin policy highly skilled politician in the short term. Technical sense turned it into a defence of the old order. There's no chance a Senate will convict Trump is much Mcconnell has made clear, so the house passing this narrow, legalistic indictment, looks more like perform

once and a weak one at that in politics is about taking a stand, making a gesture and not changing the world. What does the end game for impeachment MAX swears? There looking for a restoration of the Obama Clinton order, much less the elevation of President Michael Pence, but should Trump be convicted or move from office as fast falls at scenes, the result would be the location of pants ass for the restoration angle, there's a species. Of mainstream Democrat, who seems to think that everything was pretty much Kane, you I'd, say it's before January: Twentieth, twenty seventeen and if we just get back to the status quo, will be well on our road to recovery, that's biting main selling point and a core belief of democratic establishment. I really look man, I liked Bernie, and you know you, don't I think you don't you don't. I think I think, there's a reason why there is a certain type type of person who would like the vetoes I make, even though they might like Trump and why I criticized Bernie, I think it's populist, that's where they will support its about its about being a right wing, populist nationalist. Whatever it's about. Do you oppose, authoritative,

you know deep state type structures, I'm not saying a literal, deep state, I'm saying these. These ivory tower elites tat. You know they they kicked Bernie out. They cheated him. We can see for all the concerns we might have about foreign policy that it states about the expansion of the military, industrial, complex, etc. The Democrats don't care than ever cared. The only reason I want impeach Trump is because this point the finger at them, and this is what I say back to these socialists. Here's what I leave you with to the socialists who are questioning impeachment. I ask you when you do when you can see that for all of trumps fault and all things you really like a bottom he's going after Joe Biden. Isn't that a good thing, What makes me makes me wonder, I'm not you know, I'm unfairly, ambivalent, sure you might not. Let me because of that, but the way I see it is, I describe it this way before trumpets a bull rampaging through their ivory tower, the security apparatus hates him, the FBI, the CIA, these people, really hate him at all them right as a culture work on, but a lot of Is these all establishment types that were heavily criticised by the left for the past DEC

gate or longer, I'm in forever, arguing torn apart by Donald Trump. So what What point do the Socialists not kick back and say? Well, you know what we want, the guy. That's how this come. Twenty twenty or twenty twenty four we're gonna get a chance to actually get Bernie Sanders end because the establishment will have been destroyed by Donald Trump. The establishment cheated Bernie Bernie may have one in twenty sixteen, but it was Clinton it was the Dnc they kept him out. If you really are a socialist, what You now sit back and say the media is lying. Its performative art impatient makes no sense. They are only met it trump because he's targeting the Euro there cronies and then catches, adventure blood. You know what I want a little target, the cronies. It doesn't mean you stop fighting for causes, it doesn't mean old chap

Mr President, when it doesn't get unlike stick up for your principles, defend what you believe in, but at the same time, why would you support this impeachment? You got twenty twenty coming up. If tromp is going to damage these crony intelligence agency, establishment Dnc, whatever it's only gonna benefit Bernie Sanders, but I'll tell you this impeachment will hurt Bernie Sanders, because impeachment will take Bernie off the campaign trail. It's gonna make him go to the Senate and act as a jar and we get super Tuesday coming up. That means violence, gonna be about, can't, go, go out campaigning and so impeachment really does hurt Bernie Sanders. It hurts Trump a little bit. Kind of I mean, but for the most part, is poles are flipping he's making all these gains I'll tell you what man I'd be willing to bet the establishment. Would four tromp over Bernie. I really do mean it because I think I think I don't look. Ass trot necessarily is a revolutionary. I look at tromp as a bull rampaging through saying the people are sick and tired of what you ve done

we're gonna Burnett, we're gonna change things and bring things back to the way they were before. They make him at a great again. Bernie Sanders calls it revolution, you want serious, dramatic change, I do wonder about the Dnc hates Trump or they hate him, but they hate Bernie way more, and this impeachment isn't going to hurt trumpets, gonna help them, but will hurt Bernie. So at a certain point, I'm wondering why don't we, the socialists just say let trump tear apart. You know: do these investigations and figure out what Biden was doing because it's only going to benefit Bernie Sanders right. So I'll leave you this I'm impressed. I am I agree with a lot of the principal the sentiment coming from Jacob and about why they really want to impeach Trump yeah. I agree, I don't think they want impeach trucks and it is a bad guy. Like his policies read. I think it's because he key point the finger at their crony establishment. I think it's always been kind about that. You know at first

he defeated Hilary and they were mad. This should have happened, but now is literally saying investigate, Durham BAR. You know what I am saying is investigate with Durham with bar and then saying, investigate, binding and now now we crossed the line nothing trumpeted before was on the line, the complained about it right, but by those crossing along Oliver there. Let me note you think, I'm in August I think you know most of the people watch me a programmer centrists I am I am. I am literally a cap Lest you now I lean laughed and policies, meaning I like the idea of social programmes, but they need to be fixed and corrected. I recognise the corruption that a system that perfect on anything but a socialist. I am far from that, but I think at least I can have a conversation right now with the people who oppose the crony Democrat. Establishment gave no principles policy and I've actually praise post.

In the past as well. Mind you and and lead to a lesser extent, show more noble I've. I've because they ve resisted people like agencies, insanity, but but, but what now? You know what I want to make sure as clear as it. I view Pelosi Schuman, Adler, you know into any even Mitch, Mcconnell in some ways, other public and just people who just want the keys to the castle. I think we're seeing a new breed of politician emerging, you know, finally, not perfectly, but there that we ve got some got some good people. I like to see, I think, in my opinion, controversial or not. I think policy is the best politician we got and I disagree with her I see the principled stance which is willing to make I've seen that the statements made about the second amendment like Walmart, I don't get it all that, but basically totally voting present shows she's gonna buck. Both you know, whatever tribal nonsense is going on. I respect that and then I, like Dan Crunch, I think, is wrong. A lot of things like ran Paul lot rung a lot of things, but you know what I would prefer to see

principled, but incorrect politicians over crony multi, millionaire Goldman Sachs speak in whatever nonsense politicians, so I will absolutely say: hi five Jacobin yes, you're right Trop is challenging the machine and that's why they want to get rid of him. We can have an argument about socialism and costs and feasibility. I think you'll, is the argument, but I would rather have that argument. I would rather have the voters decide then some stupid crony nonsense. Ok, I'm done the ground executes. Coming up at four p m at Youtube COM, Slash TIM cast: it is a different channel and I will see while there I did it I got to the click. Bake didn't die, but but not in all fairness. I'm gonna make a old and likely incorrect assumption, based on what we are seeing and actually I'll, say it and I'll walk it back. I think I think we're seeing, I guess a kind of demise of the Democrats and I will say in twenty

Sixteen is at the same time whether publicans is of their organs are falling apart and their over. So I get it, but I can't shake the feeling sixth demo to draws six million viewers, lowest figure in current cycle, and they stress Democrats have gotten Aware nearest clubs as I believe it's ugly was twenty four million p oh Tuned Embassy, Donald Trump. I think these endorsing seeing the outrage over pigment the failures, the failures to campaign on anything the economy. Don't let me show you some. Let me show you something. I got this tweet. This is a tough chart for Democrats from James, though political case of bypassing an aim wrong. I present wrong all the time but we can see that low wage industries are seen wage growth over the past four years major spike. In the Trump years and months it's all about tromp. I'm just saying, I think about it, he's doing really really well impeachment become very unpopular people. Think it's an abuse of power.

And now are seeing that the democratic Debate- six mill. In viewers. You know my trump card, currency. Twenty four million viewers so when I think about this, unlike what men nobody cares Democrats are saying any more because I'm not really saying anything impeachment its health care for non citizens, its things that aren't really acting their lives. Meanwhile, while Trump President is doing better, better not like characterize, that's biggest these biggest fault, the economy, you know, as the saying goes, the economy, stupid right Couple stores I want to show you check out this up ad from near post. Why identity, politics and minority candidates are winning over voters? a kind of voters, and so I saw this- I saw this right at so I saw them. Another store, and I saw that the love your account and unlike here's, what's happening. Donald Trump in all three in reality. Right for those that are actually tracking politics is a moderate. He really is they want to claim. Is

all right. No trumps, trumps, a New York Democrat. The only reason we our public as because democratic, never elect a billionaire but Trump adopts certain euro republican policies. Oak argued this one and then he comes from an economic, populous position. He runs with you know like, but it's like Bill Clinton. Essentially, some people of competitive tromp is not far right. Staunch conservative he's the actually has conceded some ground, unlike the algae, be deep q fights, but he's not a Democrat united me. Like I mean it. Let them join us by there's an old school democrats like in the nineties. I think with CNN. Those at that point is because tromp was able to attract new borders. The republican Party, many of which are more moderate than past conservatives, as we saw from near times are publicans, have moved a little bit towards the centre under Trump progressive nothing, a campaign on? What are they challenge among? In fact, they voted for book border financing in securing a southern border back you know, tat, ten or so years ago are now Trump is basic

adopting a lot of the policies you can put it this way trump later right. He said what do people like about democratic proposing and what do people like about what Republicans are proposing and he adopted many of these positions, creating a populist centre right position? What can the Democrats do? The only way to contrast themselves as to adapt, identity politics I mean for the most part. Would you gotta say? Oh the economy is really bad tried that nobody is buying it their economies, not bad people in their pocket they know how much money they have read the story from variety. They say six democratic debate draws Six million viewers, lowest figure and current cycle there. It is men, nobody cares what they have to say. Last, Its democratic debate, which inevitably dealt with the recent impeachment of president drop, drew just overseas million total of yours for PBS and political according to meals and figures topics such as the economy, climate change, racism, Afghanistan and taxing the wealthy were also on the agenda. Apparently nobody-

I would therefore say that total, which counts the PBS broadcast and the simultaneous on CNN and CNN and, as a makes it the least watched debate so far in the current cycle, only just behind the previous MSNBC debate, which is six point, five million Last night squaring off reached more than two million viewers across PBS stations nationwide and was seen on CNN budgets over four million people per PBS. The debate lies dreams across CBS News, our political, PBS, etc, and all the digital pulled at about eight point for me, endures. Yours, none of the democratic debates thus far in the cycle come near, but twenty four million view worship figure posted by Donald Trump. First debate on Fox NEWS in August of twenty fifteen. The most watch debate from the cycle to date was the very first NBC which drew fifteen point three million total viewers, while the Democrats

debate record to beat is the fifteen point seven who tuned in for forty CNN debate from the twelve sixteen election cycle between Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton only seven Kennedy stage last night: are they going to name it? I don't care, I don't watch debate. I didn't it's the you know the BP previous debate, then I get six point five I had on in the background and then I muted it. You know why I really dont care what they have to say to us. Your post, at only politics and minority candidates, aren't winning over democratic voters Willow reloaded about this, but so you won in unit I'm worried about I. I grew up, ok and actually experienced racism. Growing up. Ok, you know it had happened and I grew up in a mixed race, aerosols Chicago, so I saw these things. What's my biggest concern today is an identity politics, not in the way their framing it the way, the actual I'm sorry it is the way their framing it and the what their pushing, which is, the poor

problem, I'm concerned also for someone like me. I looked at them like. Not only do I not like what you're saying we're not going to care for the most part when I do less and, unlike I think, you're wrong, they which Britain is dangerous, saw all put it this way. You know it's really hard to have political discussions, because everyone's always trying to own the other, but I had a conversation David Pachmann and he asked me about identity, politics and ice, and I basically tried to explain it. Listen when do there are some people who simplify the right, identity politics to mean the authoritarian application of colloquial expression. So when, when I talk about civil rights and editor politics as a whole, I always try to make sure I say there are good aspects to it and what I'm really referring to is the authoritarian application of you know we're going to ban you because of the color of your skin things like that. If we are to talk about saying you can't discriminate em all cool with that. If we talk about schools suing and being supported by the ACL, you saying you can discriminate based on race. I'm not.

What was that, so we say: identity, politics, we're talking about that. Of course everyone said to him. You know David own, damn because TIM said identity, politics or whatever, but it's stupid. But the point is the Democrats are offering me a solution there offering me problems. You understand this. You know you might not understand how I feel and that's ok. This is the issue, let's say you know, maybe maybe some of you on the left in your watching, and you say your totally wrong about this. These things are good, fine, maybe they're good. Maybe they are but to listen. What I'm telling you? I don't feel that way. I dont see what they are doing is a good thing. There scary to me, because I have dealt with these things so so then

it becomes kind of obvious. You take minority individuals, mixed race people, you put them in front of this and then like it turns out according to the hidden tribes report. It's mostly white people saying we know what's better for you and sure enough. What was the debate stage? What that those hashtag debate so white? Yes, it turns out. It's no the wealthy white progressives who know better than the minorities. So when I see them glanced agency work to do all these things on, like Doo, Doo, doo Dorimont, making things worse from you're freaking me out, I don't got a lotta want dynamic. I support that, but I think what it really comes down to is. We ve hurt him right we ve heard at all when Donald Trump does a rally, people turn tv on I gotta be honest, even fox you, don't you get it and Fox. Doesn't air trump rallies as much as the uses do all of another? Do some of them. So I think what we're seeing from four to be fair to completely fair to the Democrats is that in the age of social media do We need all of these debates, but

stop myself there and say: well, I think that's a fair point. It doesn't addressed the issue of Donald Trump. Getting twenty four million viewers and twenty fifteen and twenty fifteen ok social media is in full swing and Trump certainly use it. Obama used Facebook so can't, say social meat as an excuse us. Why? No one cares what the Democrats, when you factor that and I think the Only conclusion we have is the democratic campaigning things. No one can about their saying nothing. No one cares. They have to say, because the reality is Americans, don't care that I'll drop as a bad guy, and I went, but when I say that I mean like his bad moral character, you know mimicking body slamming people incomparable horse face there. Will it up like explained it several times the past few days? If you got two people, one person's, often your pen, the back and handshake and other guys, you know insulting you, but often you hunt our bills. I think we know which direction you gonna walk and you can say that's that's. You know questioning integrity of the american people insulting and in another moment I saw how bad is it that Donald Trump is a mean

person. How bad is it if the economy fails and ass, it really comes down to it. Comes to american voters sang the Democrats have offered me nothing other than the risk that things get worse, but I can accept someone saying horrible things and being bad if the greater out of that, if the larger outcome is a euro economy is doing really really well, my kids are going to school at a job. So in the end, I think the Democrats are looking for some. A campaign on Donald Trump has the economy. Donald Trump foreign policy, as you know, in middle, not perfect, but you know it's less intervention is that we ve seen from other people in some areas. Trump is not perfect, but then you think about what Democrats and campaign on. Are they gonna come out and say we also agree with border security. Again. Do that then people just for Trump big. But what will you do come out and say economies going really great vote from anyway? No people just look for Trump sort. They do they come out and talk about a dandy politics and other nonsense. Nobody cares,

has no bearing on their lives, I dont care. I mean I've actually have a politically no the waste that is going to go. It's actually freaky railway. The point is look. This is it. The Democrats were supposed to be there for the working class. There was to be there for helping You were secure your labour rights. They are not doing that anymore, they're doing the opposite. Joe Biden say we're in a sacrifice: hundreds of thousands of jobs, Hillary Clinton, saying she's gonna, shut down coal jobs at the Democrats want to come out to be the party for the Ivory Tower Elites of New York City. Congratulations, done it they're all their starin at you, but regular Americans don't care what you have to say anymore. I dont know how the Democrats will recover from it's entirely possible. I you know this excitement I produced falls in the annals of history. Just like the Orange Sea has over articles twenty fifteen so sure I recognise that, but I can't take this

that so long as the Democrats are not campaigning on what people and contractually want. There won't be a democratic party. That is a consequence of this way. The viewer ships, it's kind of a vote right trumpets: twenty four million yours: they want to go it s a lover, Marheyo Democrats downward spiral. Nobody cares anymore, whose is it what's gonna happen? Twenty twenty, they know they're gonna get swept, they know, they're gonna lose so they threw him the wants aerial unless they can wrap their minds around a real manifesto, some real ideas. There was theirs, there's nothing but a fractured party that no one cares about. No one cares what they had to say. I want. I want to repeat this one more time as a sign of six million viewers. Obviously there are some people care, but in the end, for the most part, the american people are not interested in what the Democrats are selling does not bode well for their future. Stick around. I got a couple more Simons coming up in a few minutes, and I will see you all shortly.

You, and I can't stand about the modern democrats- is that their wonder biggest talking points? Is that you're a failure and you'll? Never six deed and there is no chance in this world unless you vote for me, never trust them. Nay oil salesmen tells you you can't do it. You need me period, you wanted It's in summits, the sure you know you can't fly a plane. You need a pilot, I get it, but you see all the time the leftist saying because of your race because of your gender. Because of some characteristic about you, you can't succeeded fake news. The world is your oyster. You just have to figure out This is like hacker one or one. The way I view the world is like a network of branches. Sometimes, when you're watching your pat when you're walking down one path, it was a door, is locked, do stand there and complain and stop on your feet to the doors like it's not fair

or do you say I need to find another way ends looking around? Well, if you follow the Democrats, they're gonna tell you it's not your fault. The door's locked any should sit there implant your feet. No, someone opens the door for you, whereas typically their public and say figure it out for yourself. Now I tend to fall over to the left. I believe you got it. You gotta fight for yourself. You gotta be successful, but I do believe in yes. Sometimes you might need help opening that door and you might get stuck somewhere needs and help. So I don't think it's about staunch meritocracy by using it be strongly meritocratic. That brings me to Mr Robert Reich are harming pronounce. Them is a very, very anti tromp. Guy he's a burglar professor former are former suck Secretary of labs inequality of labour. I guess inequality, media whatever he says, movies, saving, capitalism and inequality for all on Netflix books, the common good and saving capitals, and while this guy is is

pretty lefty and my recent is pretty added trot. Here's retweeted just a casual reminder that sixty percent of all wealth in America is inherited, pull yourself, but by your bootstraps, is a sham. In fact, it is not a sham. In fact he is lying to you or is just stupid, ok relations, they stood ignorant or naive, or he doesn't understand for me. I find it particularly offensive because did Paul myself up by my bootstraps have been homeless several times High school dropout from outside its cargo- and I worked hard and I learned- and I studied- and I used libraries to go on the internet as another reason. I lean left him issues I very saved me really helped government programmes, I've used them and that's why I think they're good things and those that that's the help that allowed me to fish. I put it this way. You can teach a man to fish, but it isn't it a fishing rod. He can't fish anyway rights I'll, tell you what here's the compromise dont give someone a fish, give them a fishing rod and top teach amount of fish right, you're still giving on something you're, so giving up something

outside of just knowledge and there's a quote here: it's from one of the king. It says it's alright to tell a man left himself up by his own bootstraps. But it is true, but it is cruel. Just say to a bootless men did that he ought to lift himself up by his own bootstraps. Now be honest, you can fish without a fishing rod. You can stand there, so the animals, the fish, are caught. You know, get accustomed your presence and then dart. You know doc your arm in their great that fish and you done it yeah kind of impractical kind of difficult. I think you know what let's teach people to fish, but then we also can figure out how to get them. She rod and put them on their way because we do want to help right, do not believe the person who tells you this, because let me show you a secret, is I've got a secret, but I guess Canada's when he says a casual reminder that sixty percent of all wealth in America's inherited. Well, here's the reality. Seventy percent of rich families lose their wealth by the second generation. I kid you not it's, because the ability to

build. Wealth is not something that you just you just have or you don't just because someone gives you money doesn't mean you not. I maintain that wealth and there's idea on the left that all rich people are in unfairly rich. The case Jeff based us was not a rich guy when he was our Lord s position, as I mean to extent there like middle class and upper class people by means of billion are now we got started. He was of more modest means. He builds up that wealth events have happening you too rich person than you know so well, but this way, if I would have kids, those kids would grub much better. Then I grew up, and so I am very conscious of this. So well I mean honestly, I kind of don't. I don't really live all that. Well, I mean I have a house but Zaga Jeff basis. An infinitely more, but it is true. You know I've been home lesson. Might you know about my family had waited bankruptcy, we lost our home, and things like that is behind us. Only my kids would deal with but we should probably you someone who s substantially more money right, so you look at a celebrity who grew up poor, become soup because

super wealthy, multimillionaire billionaires, another kids are living in penthouses in New York. And so they really don't understand what it means to have nothing. That's where the biggest reasons why I think within the second generation, seventy percent of rich families lose their wealth, so you wanna talk about wealth being transferred. This is what they don't tell you most of the time the money is lost because the understanding. You know growing up in squalor learning that real hustle, so that you can save money not meeting an infinity porn pass in New York, you save money, you make money David Dementia become you wealthy and then you can live in then you can have the infinity pool the kids grow up without understanding, true hardship becomes spoiled, and I dont know how to make money because they just have it and then by the third generation. It's gone. Let me let me read you. The story is important stuff. They say when Stephen level used to visitors, grandparents as a kid it was like entering the world of coal porter or the great gets me people dress.

And took citizens it cocktails. They owned boats, airplanes, a hobby form, not dimension a lavish mansion and Interior Canada and a summer home in Southampton. New York is an article four point fifteen. By way, he estimates this grandfather who founded the John Forts ICE, Forsyth sure a fortune of at least seventy million dollars in today's dollars, but through a combination of bad decisions, bad luck and alcohol dependency. The next generation squandered that money? I think about it? All the time says level a financial plan or in Walnut Creek California? Indeed, seventy percent of wealthy families lose their wealth I can generation and a stunning ninety percent by the third. According to the volumes group, wealth can consultancy. So this is one of the big ol befell caught a misunderstanding of the left when he says sixty percent of all all has inherited. He wants you to imagine. You know that

wealthy Lord from Britain coming over here and a fancy boat and giving his kids all money and those kids. I want you to believe that the old money goes back generations, hundreds and hundreds of years and reality. Well, it's true much of the wealth is inherited, especially because you know if your somebody who bought a house when you die. If you pass that house on right but the reality is it's not one family. It's not like ten families owning all the wealth there, certainly royal families. You know me there certainly dynasties, but most of the wealth being transferred is someone who comes from humble means who did pick themselves up by their bootstraps to a certain degree, making a bunch of money passing into their children who then squander it and then that those kids don't pass on very much of anything. A different family that makes my and peasant undercut that's what you see how it works is why the american dream is a real thing. Ok, I did not. I come from very modest. And now I'm doing very, very well. I,

when I pass on, and I give my inherent and wait for me number as though high school dropout, mixed race, self cider from Chicago, is old, money you you don't really what's really funny about this on explain something. First of all, I wanna make sure it's clear the point I'm trying to make as there is a solution to our problems and there's a path forward, and maybe you can't see it and that's a challenge, but it exists. You can do better during occupy Wall Street. I had people say to me we would have conversations, they say things like man you're. The perfect example of how the system has failed. You like a bright guy, you're you're travelled you know you're you're, honest, and where are you you know no good job? You know high school dropout sausage, cargo that proves it mixed race that proves it. Patriarchy whites primacy up until some people are right, magazines about museums, really funny they like to praise

he sang see you're a good example of the problems in the system. Shouldn't someone, a smart and honest as you be successful system is broken. What happened in a month or two when they were correct and I became more sex So, all of a sudden now these people started saying that I was white privileged silver spoon in my mouth trust one kid and that's why I'm successful others just accused me of working for the federal government. It was put out the same people wanted to use me as evidence of their ideology and then, when it prove their ideology wrong. They claimed. I came from extremely wealthy beginnings, which is absolutely not true. My family we lost our hominid and a bankruptcy had to move around. I've been homo several times, but the reality is that I want to admit it did not want to admit that that's their fault, but they do want to admit that. Look, I gotta be honest.

Everyone is going to have the skills or ability or the energy to run a fortune five hundred company or to be the best of the best and to be the wealthiest some people, my only ever be really good at making cheeseburgers. You know what I dont think at less of anybody, because they have to be a janitor. I why I think it is wrong to look down upon someone simply because their agenda to me it's not about how much money you make out about the status. You have it's about your willingness to work hard and its end and that its role it comes down to I have from I have so much more respect, for you know a cleaner, a local doesn't Craigslist and says I will clean your house. You know like these are people who say look. I don't have all of the skills in the world. I can't perform neurosurgery, but you know I can do. I can clean someone's house and I will offer up that service and I will work hard and I will do my best and maybe they will never own a massive cleaning empire but their willing to work hard to succeed.

And they deserve so much more than the whining people complaining, but how they deserve the means of production or the people would lie to you and say you can't pull yourself up by your boots that it's a sham celebrity baffling. Mr La Russa, right players. Self up by your bootstraps is not a sham. It is true that everybody has boots so the way I view the world is, I actually left on this. I will absolutely buy you a pair of boots and I will do my best to you now to give you person, you know, to teach you perseverance, to explain to you how to how to succeed to teach you to fish. If I see someone sitting by the creek and they're saying I'm hungry I'll, say you know what take my fishing pole, let me show you how to use it and from now on you know you can make sure he's gotta do first, yet catch some fish, don't eat all fish, sell some of the fish tradesmen fish and make sure you have enough for a back up fishing rod.

Stop your brakes. You can go out and fish again in the worst case scenario, if a storm comes in, a flood comes and destroy that fishing rod come back and I'll do my best to help you, because I can So I'm I'm I'm a bit of a lucky. I like these programmes, but the reality is the truth is closer to the middle. You can play up via bootstraps if you have boots, and you know what most people do. Ok most will have the means to succeed. Not everybody, though, so I like to help those who don't, but if you're gonna go around telling people they can never succeed, you are creating the problem. You are worse than those who would tell some without boots. I would rather, I would rather see people saying I don't care. If you have boots are not unique to figure it out. You deploy herself up that a bunch of people saying you can never do it, because the very least, even if you didn't have the bootstraps, which is its a metaphor for the means, the resources you can be homeless. You can have no clothes. You can be in the middle, the woods

but you can pick up a rocket. Congratulations and I ve got something you can start doing something: go: watch, ancient technology on you to my love, these channels. You build a mud, Hoddan and having got house, you build a house amazing, a dirt dirt, mutton, fire, brilliant, absolutely brilliant and and people dont want accepted. They get mad. When I argued against socialists that we should take the means of production and unlike Gnomon somebody built that you might not like the way it was built or how the system functions, but you will responsible for yourself and it is possible, but the problem is people like this will tell you it's not don't, listen to him entirely possible to improve your life there. There may be an upper limit. You might not be smart enough. You might need a million dollars from your dad. Maybe you'll never be possible, but don't be jealous two other people figure out how they got where they are. If you're looking at someone who got somewhere unfairly, because I didn't hear their wealth or look at that person, look at the person who built an empire or who, but a small business figure out what they did. Ask them for advice, and you too can succeed, ignore the hated

want to hold you down. The only reason I won't tell you can't do it is that you swear you religions to them. Thinking you must be dependent upon their system, not true. You can teach yourself how to fish. You can figure it out, but I do agree with helping people. Just don't listen! These liars stick around! I'm not a segment coming up in a few minutes, and I will see while shortly the space force is a fish and I gotta admit, is actually really really cool. For some reason, there are a lot of people ragging on tromp, for wanting a space force, and I gotta admit, is the cool thing. Tromp has ever done and I'm not very critical, the guy in terms of foreign policy and military. It's not like that. Right again. I know one nuance: every freak out, no credit words courts do, but I think Its use following a long line of stupid foreign policy, he's a little bit.

Better in some ways than a bomb was but come on. Man, TA, Mok missiles, Yemen raged minarets. Drone strike me look like a gonna million years. I dont want to, though, because at this point I wanna see some cool the space force. I imagine the future is gonna, be so dramatically different, but its awesome that were now and during what was once consider this to be like a sigh, fi just a sigh five future. You know not not real, not a real thing. You know we have all these shows. You know yet Starfleet STAR Trek any of you. This siphoned these, where there is like a fleet, not our space. This is the beginning of that. Ok, so you might not like the Orange man, that's fine, but think about what this means. After the orange man is gone and how we can improve this and actually start colonizing the stars. This is where it begins massive investment into space infrastructure. Could you imagine a child today? Ok, somebody who's like six or seven years old, and there asked They want to be when they grow up and they want they set out

a servant, a space force and I want to be a rocket plain pilot. You know we have people say I wanna be a firefly when I grow up. I want to get my wings. What about your propulsion? Jets weapons? Go this cool stuff. What three the story and here's? What means from the air force times? Airforce officials on Friday told reporters that people are clamouring for information on how to join the military's latest branch. The short answer is about to wait: awhile Tromp, officially sign the space force into law on Friday. But now all that means is everyone at air space command will now be assigned space force or the next eighteen months official set a finer details. Of Manning and training, the new branch will be hammered out and set in motion. Quote it's going to be really important. We get this right, a uniform, a patch song it to the culture of a service said: Airforce, general, J, Raymond, the head of AIR Force Base Command and U S space command

who will lead space force until a chief of space operations, is confirmed by the Senate. There's a lot of work going on towards that end. It's going to take a long time ago that point: that's not something we're going to roll out on day, one on very critical, a lot of things American America does in in terms of foreign policy, I have no opinion in terms of what America is doing in terms of space policy, because we don't really have that intergalactic interstellar solar power. That would you describe it right up to a point that is ok. Ok, we got do this right. Think about fifteen twenty years from now we're gonna be like President Prodi, President Johnson. Ok at this,

space policies nuts, the unit you know that's the thing is proposing with the moon base and Mars launch is a waste of money or think about this in twenty years. President Johnson, if you want to build a border barrier on and on the moon, to separate the? U S, colonies from the China colonies, and I think it's a mistake. I know you might have issues with the idea of a wall I just they could be called opposition have only lords of future, and I think right now to see me a lot of young people out of kids, who are seeing that syphon dream that STAR Trek future. I note very different, but that's the real life version of it. Some people have criticised it saying you know the air force already did. This is a big difference between the air force and the spaceport, and I get it they could argue. You know the air force could eventually become the space worse because just about you up, but I'm thinking about fifty two hundred years from now right,

what technology will bring us. Will we eventually discover some kind of propulsion technology that doesn't require hard fuel, like you know, like massive yours, like look at this shit, you know to get into space requires a lot of energy. Will we have till we get some kind of like low energy alternative, maybe some kind of anti graph technology or something, and if that's the case, we might actually have territories in outer space and therefore flocking to deal with that, you could argue the space force gets. You know technologically advanced enough to the point where, if we have ships that can float around like the ufos do than they could essentially be our airforce anyway, so fine, maybe in the future, it will become obsolete or those adopts semantic symbol.

Technologies- and I tell you this year, the army as boats right people might be brought up. The naval no army, as I think the army is more boats in the Navy Navy- has the pig, crazy bucks. That's my understanding, so I wanna okay. So this is fine right, but we're gonna have a little bit more functional and I'm not gonna sit here and just tell you about the space force I want to. I want to dive into the mysteries in this world and the reason why some conspiracy may think space force was, really being formed, what's really going on behind the scenes now. Let me stop here. This is serious. The space horses cool I'm excited to see what this becomes so far. So good. Ok, you don't like the president to recognise space forces, cool, aren't Ip Borg in a language that the trumpet they trump so much. We got a space for stew

some, but now, let's have some fun, and I want a preface by saying I am not here to push stupid, conspiracies or anything, I'm just here to have a little fun with these UFO stories you see over the past year or two, there have been them our expansion of stories about your foes, credible ones, and I've talked about it because I love talkin about things at a kind of unknown. I might launch it at war, repairing a different podcast to take all of these stories that we can't solve. You know basically the point of news to, but here's what we know these stories are to be like yours, we don't know ripe quote, it did not obey the laws of physics. Pilot who, spotted famous Tiktok UFO breaks silence after fifteen years, it was going from like fifty thousand feet to a hundred feet in like seconds which is not possible. Is he the story is new. The story just came out, some people believe

for the past few years. The reason we ve seen a credible stories about your vows that aliens are real, yes and that they that the governments of the world that need to get us warmed up to the idea all of a sudden. At the same time, space force emerges So we can play silly games and act like you know. The aliens are really you're not gonna walk back, but I will say there is something interesting that should be mentioned, that we have an uptake in all of these credible stories about Ufos Navy pilots going back years saying this is real men, all the son, a space force being signed into law. Is it possible that in reality, it's not about eighty since its about the fact that governments recognising finally- and they are that there are some there's something happening in space in an atmosphere? We can't understand and we're going to need to investigate why we're going to need to invest and investigate

what's going on waiting to invest in a space force that could actually deal with this in a much better way. If it's, you know, I think the fairest assessment, if we're gonna combined stories, is that for the past several decades we ve learned that there have been credible sightings from servicemen saying we see weird things: these techniques in do that that domain laws of physics. Now you ve got tromp sang. Perhaps it should have a space force, because for whenever this, as we don't know, we should be exploring this area. You see the air force was always about the air, not above it, maybe there's something that needs to be to be looked at. So there's a story about a: U S, fighter pilot whose plain filmed the famous and still unexplained Tiktok UFO footage and has spoken for the first time about his cousin counter jet Underwood, broke fifteen years of silence on a subject describing the oddity record over the Pacific Ocean, as

behaving within the normal laws of physics, is that it was going from like thirty thousand feet, two hundred feet in seconds, which is not possible, then I'm sorry is possible. We don't have to do it yet you know there's some people that argue that anything is possible in the matter of figuring it out. So perhaps we're looking at technology. We don't understand perhaps as a simple ascend, Russia, developing technology. We don't know about or its american technology, from an undisclosed branch of govern. We don't know about. Perhaps the sexually part of a black operation space force and the technology will now be rolled out to the public over time. Could it since it is a few conspiracy to entertain right,

Is it possible that the? U S? Government is scared. Whatever these things are and wants to launch a space force, is it possible that these are actually made by the United States in secret and now because we want to start using them to agree to show our military might we needed? We need to explain how they, actually, you know how they could come to exist, perhaps not the space force in the next few years there in a bag. Look at this thing we built, even though we ve already have the technology. For a long time.

I just like the idea thing. It's fun, I'm not telling you it's true. I know all the stupid luck as we look to push as you have a conspiracy, Ultimo, calm down. Ok, the stories real from the independent leftwing site. I think it is right to talk about the Tiktok so called because of its rounded shape and white color was caught on video as the. U S, Navy attempted to identify a series of objects spotted on radar flying off America's West Coast in November, two thousand for the authenticity of the film which was first made public and twenty seventeen was finally confirmed by the Pentagon. Earlier this year, official said they still have no idea what the recorded object was, whether phenomenon member craft and birds have all been ruled out. So, but this way a major doctrine. You watch Fox news all time. You're not, the most sophisticated person on the planet- and you hear news about Ufos and then he probably turns the pants and other people and says: what's what are these things? We know this is, and they said we don't want the funniest

Folks, I things on Joe Rogan. They sad. If aliens were real Donald Trump, you think a geek. He could keep his mouth shut about this stuff. Now, I think here's what we're say I have is that I'm gonna tell you: if aliens existed and the U S knew about it yet Trump would be. We can really. It's reaches blurted out any talk about it. He's not, though, which says to me promote the case, and I think you know he's had something of the fact of life that they did. They did really is a budget for documents, and he said it was about time this. Here's what I imagine these stories get prominent just because their interest, and not because its new or what by independent, I recognize it and there's tromp sitting down and he sees on the news. This isn't about Europhiles and he looks over and says we don't do. We not these things are They must present, we don't wait, we don't know this was, and then he paused something like shouldn't. We- and there like we're, probably showed me goes. Where were we do and what we do with this stuff in their like the air force, typically deals with it, and then Trump probably said what about space? What, if your ufos, let's do a space force and they went

Yes, so I do think it's connected right, but I dont know these objects are a mockery to speculate in play games. I just think it's fun. I think it's cool we finally space force. I think it's cool, Finally, there is something that I think can young people can aspire to a kind of a common vision. You don't even states went to the moon. This was like an american thing: everybody's like we're gonna. Do it what what Americans unified by today? Nothing really I mean people even hate the space just dumb. It is an expensive. You know, package shocking criticising expense for sure. But you know what we're gonna spend more than anything really did military will at least up my biggest problem with taxes is not taxes. It's the technical to war. I'll tell you what, if you take my tax money, you build spaceships space colonies a moon colony stuff. Can I give you more money to do it like out gladly pay more for people to go and do these things? I'd love to see on a mere you know

human colony on Mars and the moon and there's talk about it. Chop talked about it. Yes, please, more of this, this stuff, I will absolutely brace promise more than any other theirs. They around next video, be tomorrow at ten, a M podcast everyday six, thirty p m, and I will see you all them.