To say the Democratic Party is a complete state of chaos would be an understatement in twenty sixteen, as we all know, the Dnc cheated Bernie Sanders out of the nomination to nominate a wildly unpopular candidate, Hillary Clinton who went on lose the general election and today we are still seeing absolute chaos, and Dnc is now being exposed. Plotting way to steal the election from Bernie Sanders, but weights, of course, The media is still going after tromp we're not done, but the latest store. Political shows that Michael Bloomberg, who bore. His way into the democratic debate has been privately being the moderate Democrats to support him in the event of a brokered convention. Right now, the latest five he ate prediction model shows that no one will win the democratic nomination. That is the most likely outcome. So Bloomberg is rallying the democratic establishment to steal away from Bernie Sanders, even if he gets the popular vote in the primary.

Because, as far as any ones as far as I know, we can tell us why, as I can tell the demo nominating process is rigged to allow hi high profile elites to decide who the nominee Welby now for all the things I disagree with Bernie Sanders on. The one thing we agree on is that if he wins the vote here, could be there nominee but of course The agency has the delegate process and the super delegate second round. Michael Bloomberg is hoping to exploit this so that at the deal, see at the Democratic national convention. The moderates we'll all side with him and push out Bernie Sanders boy. Can you imagine the absolute chaos in the streets of Milwaukee at the DNA when Bernie Sanders gets robbed again now there are some good reasons why the Democrats, are rejecting Bernie Sanders. His policies are not very popular outside of urban centres and the guy just had a heart attack but now we're seeing another thing. That's very interesting because the cheating, in my opinion, extends beyond just Bernie Sanders there.

They just going after the populace in general. They hate Donald Trump much the same, but they also hate Michael Bloomberg. First summary Then there is no unity in the Democratic Party, it is absolute chaos and the media can't decide who to smear Trump or Bloomberg. So, let's break this now first thing to do is show you the story blind you how the establishment is going to steal the nomination from burning and then only show. They're gonna, try and mere discredit. Donald Trump will see how things play up the first door from politico Bloomberg, quietly plodding brokered convention strategy, the efforts efforts is designed as a political backstop to block Bernie Sanders by poaching supporters. Joe Biden and other moderates. Now before we read on make sure you had over two TIM cast outcome: slash donut. If you'd like to support my work as many ways you can give, but the best do is share this video there's gonna be important news for Sandra supporters and imagine so if you find on the left. You should pay attention to this, this other gonna steal from Bernie Sanders. Now again, I think there's good reasons why there

scared of a Bernie Sanders nomination. All that really matters and here's the bad As for you on the left and the Democrats, you're gonna lose two Donald Trump. Now media is trying to mute smear the president, but the fact that the democratic parties fractured this heavily and the fat that no matter who gets nominated there have a bunch of weaknesses and pitfalls shows that tromp is walking into a winning fight, but again sharing this video good. How breaks in echo chambers over the rest of you. I noticed many people haven't subscribed. If you like this video, I want to see more. Please subscribe to this channel, hit that Notification bell, so that you too will finally start telling you and I have videos because they don't. Let's read the story from politico. They report my Bloomberg is privately lobbying democratic party officials and donors ally with his moderate opponents to flip there. Legions to him and block Bernie Sanders in the event of a brokered national convention. The effort largely executed Bloomberg senior state level advisers. In recent weeks, attempts to Prime Bloomberg for Second, about contest the Democratic National

mention in July by poaching supporters of Joe Biden and other moderate Democrats according to democratic strategists familiar the talks and on with Bloomberg now it would be I believe it is fair to say what Bloomberg is plotting here. Isn't overt cheating like the brokered convention? Hey, that's common, so Bloomberg wants to get ready because he wants to win. However, Bloomberg has bought his way into this race. If the, we're establishment, which has already catered for this billionaires demands now decide. They're gonna give him the nomination he will have bought and paid for the nomination. Stealing it from the actual popular populist Bernie say there's. Thus the whole big picture we stepped back is nothing but crony establishment. Cheating but hey, are you surprised, so surprised me that Donald Trump and other Republicans and the burning and mention the Dnc cheating everyone, issues with the democratic establishment, Steve banning

begin to build more said. He likes Bernie burning identified the problem under the wrong solutions. I think it's fair to say there is a pie, The list position shared by many Americans, the rejection of the elites, Donald Trump, the populace for the right Bernie Sanders to the left disagree in a lot of issues, but at the end of the day, everyone's point, the finger at the staff meant which is selling the position to Michael Bloomberg. Three more. The outreach has involved meetings and telephone calls are supporters of Biden and Buddha Judge, as well as unfair Dnc members in Virginia taxes. Florida blow my North Carolina according to one of the strategists who participated in meetings and calls with Sanders emergence as the front runner in the presidential primary Democrats in those its have recently raised the prospect of the devil Riddick Socialist, could be the top of the ticket. Liability could be a topic on top of the ticket liability. There's a high operation going on, which is genius, said one of the strategists was on affiliate with any campaign, and it's going to

help them when on the second ballot, they're telling them that's their strategy? This is why I have basic we set out to the Democrats. I was on voting in this primary has really excited for Andrea anger, tall see and I may have. The first somebody else the nomination, but I am so done with this. They are bragging about, how they are going to take away the nomination from the popular candidate to give based the elites, not let the butler him up. Bernie Sanders is very much pro popular vote at the national level hearing. Maintaining that same principle in the democratic primary. If I get the popular vote, I should have the nomination. I respect that the delegation press is not the same as the Electoral College and United States electoral college crater balanced between more rural areas and more. Been areas because worry or public, not a direct democracy. I respect electoral college in that regard. Super delegates are, Rony establishment elites who can subvert the popular vote with their own choice and theirs.

Reason they should be given this waited power at all. When it came to the delicate assignment process, PETE Buddha judge one more rural districts in Iowa than Bernie did. Thus he got more delegates to me that makes sense. He appeals to a wider based than by he does, but the super delicate process there bragging about as far as I'm concerned is overt cheating. Super delegates are party elites. They given the position and they're going to say, I want Bloomberg and Bloomberg paid for at all. Let's read some more its presumptuous play for a candidate who hasn't yet one a delegate or even here on a ballot and it could also bring haven't to the convention, raising the prospect of party in delivering the nomination to a billionaire over a progressive populist. We know how the Democrats are you're, a sand or supporter of your populist on the left. Don't I know,

People will consider themselves Democrats, but I think we can see it for what it is. The progressives are not Democrats Bernie as an independent, their insurgent campaign, sameness, tromp was and the establishment is outraged. Other candidates have been quietly in content for months with Super Delegate's, Dnc members, members of Congress and other party officials who cannot vote on the first ballot at a contested national convention none of showcase it as a feature of their campaign, as Hillary Clinton did and twenty sixteen asked about Bloomberg efforts, folks, woman Julie, wood said Thursday, we have an enormous apparatus that is constantly reaching out to all types of people for support and to explain why we think MIKE is the best candidate to take on Donald Trump saw. The story but the Washington Post wrote an article I I was an opt out. I believe that said we should give more

or to the elites to choose our leaders I met. I can only imagine the founding fathers would think. If that's the kind of rhetoric being pushed forward in today's politics, the elites should decide. Maybe they would agree, but in this country is founded upon the idea that, from the poorest the richest we get about, we get a say and who are representatives are today the establishment to make sure the cronies get to pick. How is that actually a democratic institution? I get it we're not a democracy, but we expect our vote to matter but if before you even get to the general election, that the Democratic National Committee decides, who you and even choose to vote, for we don't even have a democratic process for electing representative. Therein lies the big problem. They are refusing to give up their crony power and they might lose it because even if they stop Bernie Sanders today, com, the next election, it's going to be Bedlam ten fold.

I can only imagine what Anti fought and Bernie Brows will do in the streets of Milwaukee when it stolen from him. Again now you may think, let's say your Barney supporters, probably some of you You might think that this will happen and Bernie will win. Maybe the poles have been wrong, but check out this prediction model from five: thirty, eight, it recently just flipped in the past day, that no one will win the nomination now for a while Bernie Sanders was projected and for some reason after Bernie hits Joe Biden but Michael loan Birgus quickly rising because he's got the cold, hard cash to buy the process, and unfortunately it works, but now that we can see, no one will win we're going to a contested convention, and that means Bloomberg. Efforts will like

pay off, and that will give a warning to all of the people who don't like tromp, who find themselves on the left and want an alternative. I'm sorry, Michael Bloomberg, is ten to twenty times worse. What Donald Trump is he speaks ill, worse than tromp ever codec is actually enacted racist and bigoted policies. Look and brag about them, he is everything the Democrats have claimed. Trump is and worse. And he is buying and now stealing the entire process. I am not a fan of Bernie Sanders policies and a lot of things he has said in the past and I've been very critical of him, but I will absolutely maintain Democrats, choose Bernie Sanders to be the nominee, so be it. That is their right to choose, and I will do agree with Mr Sanders and arson centres, I would disagree with President Trump and will see how things play out, but that's not what were given being handed a crony ellida stability and there on the ticket? I hope it does not come to Bloomberg, but while the Democrats seemed

Bloomberg as their saving grace cause. People are scared of Bernie Sanders, you're wrong I will never vote for Michael Bloomberg. That will never happen and Annette Moderate that you want to win over now, I don't think, I'm representative everybody, I don't know, but I certainly think there's a lot of people like me who find ourselves politically homeless. Who used to be? I dunno fanciful by There are many people voted for a bomb afflict for trump you're, not gonna, win them back. Many of us people were interested and Andrew Yang what you lost them now, I all so think Bernie Sanders does present serious problems and I hate it. Because a lot of people you know, look I get it. Man and see is cheating your candidate for Europe for the people to the Barney fans, but a lot of people. The moderates just do not think he'll. When I don't understand how this is the choice I'm being given Bernie Sanders the socialist I'm not going to vote for it, but it's beyond just being a socialist. It's the flip flopping on immigration on workers, Rights

and on social justice rhetoric. I just I cannot support that. What you're gonna give me Michael Bloomberg. Now no, I might consider PETE Buddha Judge, but I just do not think he has the charisma and ultimately comes up like another establishment figure only this time, their pretending he's. Not so sorry, I'm just not interested in what you are offering, but Bloomberg is seriously if you put Bloomberg up its trop trump becomes the lesser of two evils: we'll take a look at the story from the posting Courier South Carolina is a seriously important state. You can see this Joe Cunningham slams Bernie Sanders socialism ahead of twenty twenty democratic primary. This is a guy who is a democratic congressmen. It's a! U S. Rep Cunningham is one of only two democratic congressmen from South Carolina forcefully rebuked. You

a senator Bernie Sanders on Wednesday jolting the states first in the south presidential primary race just hours after the Vermont Senator one in New Hampshire. These are the states burn you would have to win. I think what we are saying is that, regardless of the Democrats cheating, they favours, they split down the middle. I just do not a victory for them. I could be wrong now. Bernie Sanders has recently split from war, some or the far left Kenneth as a rift between him and YO see. I don't think it's a big deal, but I highlight this just to accept the point I made about the split even Bernie Centre, recognizes this and he has said either. Elsie has gone too far or not far enough, because there is confusion in the ranks about what message they need to actually, when and now here's where we all Bernie Sanders, poisoning anatomy slight dot com is anything but a right wing site. They are a left wing site and they this article, what are the chances Sanders has another heart attack before November. I d break it to you, but at his age, there's a fifty percent chance

that he will actually be hospitalized again and there's a thirty to thirty five, percent chance that he will act face another heart attack slight says by virtue of four incident. Fremont on the trail that number is now lower for centres. But his chance of another hospitalization between now in November alone, likely remains between thirty to thirty five percent Bernie Sanders had a heart attack, that's gonna, be bad for him in the general election, he's got supporters who say vile things and make them and take vile action, and this means, while you may think, he's the real progressive populist reserves to win and he's got that popular vote. It's gonna be bad news and the mainstream democratic establishment has a reason to fear him. But you know what I stand on principle. I don't care if you're afraid I dont care of Burma is gonna, lose

a lot of people, support Bernie think he will win more power to you. I think you'll lose. It doesn't matter, it doesn't matter. The Democrats are scared. He is the choice of the people assuming he is, then he should get the nomination. What I find particularly interesting is that, right now, Bernie Sanders has taken the lead Biden, Collapsed I show this is agriculture. The democratic voters, mostly because I dont I understand why some would claim to want to vote for Biden up until Biden lost now. They claim they want to vote for. Burning seems like money. The voters are our voting on a whim. The biggest issues for Democrats is probably whether or not the can we'll just win and be trump. What that fled from Biden Bernie, another rise of Bloomberg shows I'm sorry, you don't have the party unity to actually stop trump and now we can see how republicans have responded: republican revenge, record GEO P field forms on twenty mission to take socialists this to me was surprising because mindset

Republicans were laughing at the rise of the far left, thinking that they would win and what will be unstoppable of burning it's the nomination, but a lot of people are freaked out. Fox NEWS reports in twenty nineteen alone- seven honoured eighty one Republicans filed federal paperwork to run for the house, the most ever recorded in an odd year at the Federal Election Commission. That's up from five hundred and ninety three Gibby Kennedy, twenty seventeen when Democrats had an astounding, nine hundred and thirty seven candidates. At the same point, Rob Republican. Can it's across the country interviewed by Fox NEWS? So they feel momentum is on their side this time and our jobs by President Trump and as impeachment acquittal congressional hopefuls are making the case that, Europe needs a fighter like them in the house, or else the country will soon come to a socialist democrats. Plans quote I'm tired of seeing my president attacked every day said: Marjorie Green, a GEO be businesswoman and first time congressional candidate running for an open, Seton, Georgia's fourteenth district,

I'm tired of seeing our future threatened. I'm tired of seeing my children's future extremely threatened and it's time to get up the bench and really step up to the plate. This is the story I was. I was actually basement previous point off of down ballot. Republicans watch with Glee Sanders gain steam trumpet Republicans are suffering in the suburbs, but their confident voters. There will view Bernie as worse, we'll see how that plays out populist versus populist Frank, launched. The famous pulsar says it's gonna be a gruesome battle, but let's talk about you odd phenomenon. That is the media. Is the media likes to smear Donald Trump, but I actually think one of the biggest reasons Democrats are in freefall in and falling apart is because the media does not care they seek to exploit Republicans, don't trust the media, they ignore it. So they are unified under trumps message, but the left does pay attention to the media. In the media isn't giving them a cohesive message, I am

So what we have to point out this hilarious article from the Atlantic, titled tromp, is going to cheat o o Trump is gonna cheat couple, because I thought we already. Next, the Democrats, cheating and twenty sixteen and are actually witnessing it right now open its tromp was gonna. Do it ok, sure not tromp is gonna win tromp got an economy on his side. He's got unity on his side and you know what that's the problem of the Democrats by love. Other media is just trying to go to people into clicking their stories. This creates a serious problem for the Democrats. Check out take a look at the story from vocs the most mind now. Thing I've ever seen. I can't breathe about to do this, but I now have to defend Michael Bloomberg. Yes, I must do it. I have no problem defending Donald Trump when the media lies

defining Bernie Sanders in the media lies, and now I have to defend Michael Bloomberg, because the media is lying in the most insane way possible. Vocs reports might Bloomberg treated at doctored debate video. Is it polluter Spin or disinformation here is a good one from the new civil rights movement not come. Propaganda Bloomberg destroyed for posting, deep, fake hoax clip of his debate performance to make em better and over on Google. We can see just about all these sites on the left. Writing story, claiming that Michael Bloomberg doctored a video. Let me show you what really happened Brendan Car As a commissioner for the Effie see, I believe, atrophies. Currently, he says political satires, one of the oldest and most important forms of free speech, a challenge

Those in power, while using humour to draw more people into the discussion. Equating this type of political speech with doktor defects or illegal content is a serious mistake. You see, Michael Bloomberg is trying to win, but he's not going to. Even if the democratic US, applicant steals the nomination from burning because the media is not on their side. The media the sight of exploitation and getting clicks. Now. I think it is fair to say that a lot of progressive activists in media who lie to benefit their ideology. Perhaps here's what we're seeing with vocs and this left wing site a lot of these more progressive websites want Bernie Sanders Twin and are rejecting the democratic established So, as far as I can see, the democratic establishment has lost serious allies in media. Michael Bloomberg made a video that next it was. It was a long drawn out silence with crickets and the background meant to accent the fact that no other democratic started a business was obviously fake, because nobody

There were actually crickets inside the debate studio. Yet for some reason, all These outlets wrote that it was a doktor, video or misinformation and now we can see this response from people on Twitter political fact says this: the vet It was mostly false. It was selectively edited to make it look like Bloomberg. If the other democratic, headed speechless for twenty seconds selectively edited it intentionally made to be funny. It's called a joke. One guy says Kessler one as a seriously question the credibility of any campaign that would push such a manipulated video these reactions. Shots are unrelated to the two second moment in the debate. Dangerously slippery slope that will lead to a nuclear war of fake videos. It is a joke. You people have lost your minds than roads, as this is pure this information, Then we have paid a cossack doctoring. Videos in this manner would be career, ending in journalism, sure

Joe Roast bar sizes straight up this information. In addition to being cut, be undiluted and they should take it down. This is absolutely insane but of course the media establishment is split. I can't tell you why there so shocked that bloomer would make a joke. Maybe there People who don't like is buying buying the process, but its progress still the nomination. You may have seen this story. I love this. I tell you I do so many stories like this bombshell report Law makers are warned that Russia is meddling to re elect Trump. Oh my stars and garters, I was nearly in tears when I heard that twenty sixteen was happening all over again that Russia was coming to steal the election for Trump. Whatever show I do. But how about wait? Twenty four hours so that Journey can come out and say: oops, that's not actually what happened? That's right: Jake, Tapir publishes a thread say actually there now

trying to help tromp yeah yeah yeah. We get it. Here's what you call. He calls it pushed back from an ass. Security, official sang, that's the story being reported, isn't what actually happened? Why is it that, whenever a big story breaks about Trump doing something with Russia, we may twenty four hours and then nothing that's what they're doing Bloomberg right now and I hate to defend the guy is so similar, whether due to trampling tromp posts, a meme video, they call it doctored and manipulated. The meat is a mindless slog of just manipulation, attempts to get you to click stuff and then they how you that they falsely frame things. It's a trick. I'd like to think that in many ways the media establishment, the democratic establishment are intertwined, and they kind of are because the what the websites that are attacking Bloomberg for this add are the more progressive digital sites. But therein lies the main point. The main take away

the Democrats are planning to cheat steal the election. The media is creating a false narrative, smear trump and progressive, smiling broke, sparing smearing Bloomberg. What's really going on is the civil war is on the left. People like me are pushed out I'm gone, but then you can see progressive media smearing, the establishment, the establishment, smearing, the progressive and trump and then when it comes to the actual nomination, you ve got the Dnc establishment doing everything in their power steel, the nomination away from Barney for the second time you can't stop the wave you ve lost. The crony establishment has lost its over I'm, not a fan of these far left lying progressive websites, not offend the media, establishment lying about tromp or bloom either. I don't tell you, though, you want it. You want to get some real news. I hate to say it, but if you want every time cable news. Fox news has been more accurate than CNN and MSNBC. Take a look at Russia Gate Yup Fox NEWS was right. The arrest warrant and now you can see the New York Times said, look what really happened and, of course, its Jake Tapir of CNN.

Credit for this. Coming out saying on official, I spoke to us pushing back I'll write. You stories are fake, they ve always been fake, and this means because Trop supporters do not trust the media there, unified and Bird and Blue Bergwald Duke it out and will see if the Dnc successfully cheats and steals the nomination from burning, regardless of who gets it. Neither is going to win. I'm sorry: stick around Mexicans coming up at six p m at Youtube COM slashed him cast news. That is a different channel and I will see you all there. In what may be one of the most annoying mornings, I've ever had to deal with Russia is back on the menu. That's right, the New York Times. Law makers are are warned that Russia is meddling to realize. Tromp, don't make me do it. I don't want to do it. I wanted. I looked, I tried So sorry there is. This is the story the media's running with, because people are absolutely cycle- paths there.

Insane people who do things for insane reasons, they have no stated goals. It's like watching a good two giraffe play checkers does like national borders. There's no sane moves happening. I have no idea why they keep doing this in twenty sixteen days reached as low as possible Russia, and for years we had to deal with all This Russia nonsense, and you know what I tolerated I will see what happens here. We are once again the New York Times long because a worn, Russia's meddling, I'll just stop already you you do cycle paths are classified breathing down members is said to have angered the president, who complained that Democrats. Weapon eyes. A disclosure and then shown off, it was leaked to the New York Times and is now being weapon ized. What a stupid cringe were- the disgusting world. Now look at this

Former CIA director John Runnin, says quote: we are now in a full blown at national security crisis. These people all are mentally ill. There is thing wrong with them. This didn't, four years ago. It's not gonna work today. Stop saying this: U absolute cycle paths, Russia, Russia, Russia, here we go now. I gotta read this What story about stupid, fake news, whatever. I'm going to show you something in a second: that's gonna make you feel better by I gotta admit I theirs- Sometimes you'll see me, get really angry, like when journalists put out fake news, but right now to come nation of, like anger, frustration and I gotta admit I'm just dumbfounded- that this the smear they're going with stop and think for a moment. Russia gate, fake news, Ukraine, gate, fake news, so Russia Gate again. It's you

You kidding me. I can't believe it seriously round three season, three of the same stupid scandal. It's like these people who hate trump have no idea what to do and the just vomiting in each other's mouths. Former C. I a director John brought in his very disturbed by a new report on the new I'm such that last week that says last week members of the house. Intelligence committee were war. By an aid to acting director of national intelligence, Joseph Maguire, that Russia is actively meddling pseudonym in the twenty twenty campaign in order to get President tromp reelected quote We are now in a full blown national security crisis. Brennan said by trying to prevent the flow of intelligence to Congress tromp is abetting a russian covert operation to keep him at As for Moscow interests, not America's Brennan, Sir, as Syria, director from twenty thirteen to twenty seventeen. I just I did their insane there. There literally insight genome Americans

care about this. I am not exaggerating when I say Americans don't care about this. Brennan get it through your thick broke, skull. Adam shift. What are you doing argued its listen. A part of me wants to believe that everything they ve done. There's like of a facetious conspiracy theory? I say words like they must want to help tromp right, because every time they pushed stupid scandals. Tromp is helped by it. His approval writing is up after the impeachment and gallop says that could be due to him being acquitted in the impeachment trial Yet every single time they fail there just bashing. There is on the table over and over again hoping something tat will be different, it's what what with a definition of ants We tried the same thing over and over and over and over again expecting a different outcome. So I jokingly say something like: maybe there trying to get Trump reelected, maybe that's why?

keep screaming about Russia. Russia, listen even their own narrative about Russia. Was that not a single vote was changed, that it will. Something like a couple dozen accounts that reached, I go two thousand or more people, they spent very little money and they had almost no impact on the election. So it's like saying You put a ten year old kid, no room and say I would like you to help, get Trump elected and it turns out kids from Ukraine, and there, like Ukrainians, are trying to get tromp elected near like dude. It's like one person, who has literally no impact our what's happening, mature enough. They run with the narrative, so the Because they must want to help tromp. But no, that's that's, obviously joke, because Americans don't care about and there never gonna care about this, so I can only imagine that these people are mentally ill and there being voted in by people who are mentally while Brighton wasn't voted in, but Adam shift implosion. Whatever else. You guys you to go outside and maybe like tried

walk into a human being. What are you doing? Are you like sitting at the sitting on twitter and just so for Russia and then like out there somewhere between about Russia must be a thing. I got here doubtful now. I know it's just I don't like using single pollsters like using aggregates all showed the aggregate, a second most important problem. Where you might, you might wonder where is where we're we're Americans mines at what is the most important problem to an American. I gotta say surprisingly, this shocked me because all of the big problems people used to be concerned the past few years are no longer concerns for them to strange. Maybe it's because Donald Trump, as winning and taking care of what he said was to take care of which brings me to believe that Americans, for the most part, like Donald Trump, want him reelected a lot of Poles are wrong. This point could be wrong, so I don't even know what about, but I thought you basin gallops bull and using them

internal data compared to their internal date, I'll tell you this. Russia is fake news, its complete garbage and nobody cares trumps approval. Writing is above water for the first time, I've I believe, the first time for gallop at forty nine percent approval and forty eight percent disapproval, meaning a couple people. You know how to couple, but a couple percentage points are unsure, but now Trump is, is you know positive? The first, thing I want to show you presented of Americans mentioning economic issues as a nation's most important problem is down to ten percent during the fund crisis into an eight eighty, six percent said so and we can see when trumped not elected. It was forty percent in twenty sixteen it was four or other time you elected and its fallen. Ten percent, ten percent of Americans think the economy is the nations most important problem. Ninety percent of the people in this country are happy with the economy. What do you think is the most

potent problem facing the country today, so economic problems, rated around ten percent, like I said, and the economy in general gets two percent than theirs gap between rich and poor two percent. This is for January twenty, twenty unemployment, one percent of the country is concerned about unemployment, why the numbers better than ever the greatest Numbers in our lifetime says Jim Kramer of CNBC. What we have here, the federal budget deficit. Nobody cares taxes, nobody cares lack of money. Nobody cares wedges. Nobody cares non economic problems. Eighty two percent of the country are concerned non economic issues. The government and poor leadership is at twenty eight percent, not perhaps you're thinking but TIM, Maybe twenty eight percent of the population are concerned about Donald Trump. Now that would be fair if trot Approval rating is forty nine percent according to gallop and forty percent disapprove than a certain amount of those people properly disapprove of Trump Accept

the government. Poor leadership, may very well be about policy and humor and Adler. The Democrats and I'll tell you why, because the economy is working and Donald trumps AG get approval writing on economic issues is fifty five point: seven percent thirty nine point: four percent disapprove, but the spread is plus sixteen point. Three now Donald Trump Aggregate approval rating is forty. Six, the highest its ever been tied for the high has ever been disapproval is fifty point, nine percent, with a sharp drop recently in his disapproval. Writing if there are people who absolutely hate the president, but there still gonna, give him credit on the economy. Think it's fair to say that when it comes to government and poor leadership, twenty eight percent of Americans are concerned about it

decent percentage. I don't know how much it's not about trumpets about the Democrats and it's probably due to these psychotic stories, but I want to point this out again and I will read the Russia stuff. We well already that Brennan Garbage or act. Now over the New York Times, could see what their claiming and I'll go I'll tell us apart. But the funny thing about this whole story is how they say the classified briefing you know: tromp was mad. Cows Democrats would weapon eyes it then, right on to someone from administration, leaks the report and what Trump said to the New York Times and rot, and absolutely it's become weapon ized by the Democrats. The fact the New York than that that the media is putting this out proves it. There was a story that broke a couple days ago, an absolute piece of garbage fake news, claiming that Donald Trump offered a pardon to Julian Assange in exchange for a cover up of Russia's involvement and the Dnc hack. This was completely made up its remarkable. How made up it was

I just aren't even what's goin on me more these people of lost the plot. So I'll tell you what really happened, because a new story came out verifying. Oh, how is how is how is that always happens? Bombshell truck demand, cover up of of of Russia, Envy and unregulated offered a part into Julian Assange. Never happen is really up and a lawyer for Julian Assange said that Ex congressmen, Dana Roar Backer, had eating with Assange and off and sad that if he provided evidence that Russia wasn't involved, then Trump would give him a partners on things that affect they, then twisted that quote into trumped, demanded cover up, because that's there you- Know- that's the lie of the framing device and then a day later here comes the real news, roar or of his own volition, sad to Julia. Orange. Basically, if your claiming

she wasn't involved, then prove it and all present this evidence a trumpet see it will give you a pardon and nothing ever happened, how we get from that story three years ago, which was already reported, and everyone knew about to a bomb, shelter. A claiming Trop demanded a cover up and you go on. But if you read the stuff- and it's just like. You know, you know what man, I'm I'm I'm gonna be a bit facetious by sometimes wonder about why they banned Alex Jones because they're like this guy conspiracy theories harmful whatever and boy did they come after him hard. They banned him from literally everything meanwhile, you go and read it, and it's just these p, bull, are like drool dripping morons in the corner bashing there had on the wall, who believe insane garbage and they don't read it. But I got a blame. The press meant, I really do.

So when you look at what Americans care about, poor leadership is one, I think a large portion of this is policy. I do because there was appalled on twenty one. Half of Democrats said policy needs to go, so I think a large pour at their matter. The Democrats failures I'm because even if their mad at Trump pretty sure a lot of them are our anger. The Democrats have been ineffective and unable to actually do anything, and then you have people like Jeff Andrew quitting the Democratic Party, and then you have let you know the fact that always moderate Democrats ran kitchen table issues like Healthcare and then immediately warlike, but Orange man bad. So how many people are just fed up with this economy is great. No one cares what economic issues anymore. Life is good. Unemployment is down their love in it. The Americans are now is governed for leadership, unbiased here, but I didn't say I think for me. This absolutely does reflect my concerns right now. Life is great businesses boom everyone. I talked to examine a grand old time, making more money.

Ever made the economy. Good news: what am I my angry about where my pissed off about the Democrats I mean die. It's been that way for awhile right, you get it, but look at what they ve been doing. My biggest complaint then that, instead of dealing with they emigration, healthcare, poverty unifying the country, they scream as long as they can at the Orange man is bad, saying words just three That's all there doing scowl in shrieking tampering papers and dance your Alec chickens, their head cut off. Meanwhile trumps crack and jokes having to go to I'm in the economy is booming. There's something I've been sitting on for wine. If I'm going to a video about it, the tweet from Andrew see Johnston who goes by at data crap political distribution of journalists based on their twitter networks, from a newspaper by John holding the modal

Journalists is somewhere between Bernie Sanders and Alexandria O cause Yo Cortez. Are you kidding me? Did you see what what what Joe Rogan and all right so last year, upon Catchword Joe Rogan, an end, odd Jack Dorsey, which I got it one of the things that came up with that in twenty. Sixteen journalists on the left only follow journalists on the left, but conservative journalist follow both it stands to reason that the data shows? That is still the case. This graph you're looking at is the proper example of how insane everyone is and why there insane the average twitter, right here in the middle and then you have the median Senate Republican Mitt Romney, for some reason is, is further right, but a but again this is based on who they follow, not their personal opinions. This is significant not for Mitt Romney or for me and Republican, because we know

their opinions are. This is not saying that Romney is more conservative in the average Republican, not at all and say that who he follows on Twitter is more conservative journalist, ideology, more low equals more liberal. So over here you can see, ok yogurt as follows. Very far, left people Bernie Anders follows pretty far left people and journal, follow a similar network in between them. This means, as far as I can How I could be wrong about this. It seems that most journalists or the largest concentration of journalists are following far left personalities. They are not paying attention. What's really going on. There are not listening what conservatives have to say: that's where they are and that's what they listen to your then going to find them skewing every thing and producing stories like that's. Why? Because that's who they're following on Twitter, they are trapped in a bubble of the fringe, but it actually makes sense.

I'll. Tell you why. Why is the russian narrative now re emerging? Twenty two percent of Americans are on twitter, twenty percent, twenty percent of twitter users. None of them was a twenty percent produce. None of those twenty. I think it's ten percent of twitter users- produce eighty percent of the tweets. So I will, I will say, right away: the average twitter user is just listening. Then you have around two point: two percent of actual Americans producing tweets of that we can split it around half, because the left does have more presence on twitter about one point two percent is left leaning about. Half of that is the resistance, whereas I bring you to about point five per cent of people that are tweeting about

stupid insanity. Lo and behold, when we looked down at what Americans really care about, we can see the situation with Russia has an asterisk. Well, that's not a number ass caress. Ask us: what does that mean? Gallop tells us That is less than zero point five percent just total more than a hundred due to multiple mentions, and there you get there, you have it less than zero point. Five percent of this country according to gallop cares about what is happening with Russia. You no, it's really scary, and why the New York Times as complete gutter trash, because this issue China is blank, no who cares that to me as freakish China is doing really really messed up? Stop I mean come on. First of all, we got a trade war with tear of that's a prob. We got, I can't say the name of the infectious pandemic. I could you not against eight you to prevent physical dimension of the word.

And end we have what they ve done in the weaker camps and other horrifying atrocities. You know in western China, South China, Sea and Americans don't seem to care that to me is terrifying. And it shows me that the media has failed utterly and completely failed. I think it's fair to say that conservatives are concerned about it on the cross and talks about China all the time. Why is it that China is literally engaging and espionage cyber attacks, and you know targeting our country they built for, while the hacked Google awhile back we have. What what we're on covering that China's is is secretly giving money to light universities and professors and there's corporate espionage like these are direct attacks against us are pressing the? U S military, another other jurisdictions and south trying to see their doing horrifying things at the media doesn't seem to care. They say. Trump is wrong to go after China. They state that they had

fact, Tom Cotton, because he was concerned about the Chinese Communist Party lying about certain certain pandemic. So they said it's a fringe conspiracy, theory being pushed by those who view China as a threat. Why would the New York Times defend China say there not a threat when their literally like spying on us and stealing our intellectual property and our technology, like their literally, does not a conspiracy theory? It's a fact. We facing cyber attacks from from China for what like the past decade, you can actually go online and watch. You know mock and like a simulated intrusions, because it that, but what will they do not take the date of the intrusion of than relic of virtualization on it? And nobody cares Americans are more concerned barely about Russia, a country that did nothing nothing of what was changed. There were some Russians that we're running Facebook pages, apparently in and it was promoting, left and right wing causes sobbing discordant, but it was particularly ineffective. That's

the intelligence agencies themselves said this. So you know a man. I got a bunch of stories pulled up some of my funny like sound ones, about like dating your thirties, and I think it's hilarious. There's one about ice. The New York Times, John Brennan, these people are saying worn a full blown national security crisis over Russia. Are you nuts? Are you paying attention to what's being testified before the Senate? What the UK is tat to find out to parliament or, however, they do in Uganda about what's happening. The chinese pandemic people of freaking out. They expect us to get worse, you're, not gonna national security crisis. It's not Russia! You crazy lunatics am, I gonna, feel I'll. Give you I'll give him this. I sit here in camps, about China made many, it is about China and sure enough. No one in this country cares either, but I think it is absolutely fair as a basis

facts that, if your more concerned about Russia than you are China, then you ve been lied to buy an inapt or complicit media in and you don't- americans- are mad about right now, poor leadership and if the economy, is roaring and no one cares of the economy anymore. I'm pretty sure Americans art super concerned about Donald Trump, at least for the most part. Obviously, a lot of people hate him, but when it comes to economic issues, even the people who hate him are giving him credit limit their Russia narrative nonsense. Here we go again I'll see you all at one p m on this gentleman sprang up. Immigration and customs enforcement are straight up, ignoring these state sanctuary laws latest story from the hill, undocumented images arrested in California courthouse despite state law, into the twenty nine Bill prevents civil arrests on courthouse grounds, while a person has a hearing pending.

The general idea there, claiming in California with their sanctuary law, is that if there is a threat of deportation, these people won't participate in the criminal justice system, but I gotta say criminals to really dont participate in the criminal justice system. If they don't have to, I mean a lot Thou shalt for their court cases, but typically when their trial, get a reduced sentence or they're trying to win its all oh, a violation of the criminal justice system to be here illegally to commit crimes and then try to avoid deportation. So it's a bit paradoxical to claim They will avoid the criminal justice system. While you actually help them. Do it it's kind of like laying out and just letting them avoid the criminal justice does it make sense, but there is a bigger debate here. Only be fair. Does the federal government- have the right to supersede state laws to really interesting debate. I've heard people bring up a bunch of difference. I guess arguments for this

notably having to do with the legalization of recreational pot use in California or medicinal use, because when they were doing medicinal dispensaries. The de was in writing. A lot of the shops and a lot of people complained that of cattle born. You want something to be legal. The federal government can't intervene, but there is another counter argument: if those If what California is doing well make ease of access for regular law and going the other states, committing federal crimes easier and the feds. Do it's tough. Let's read this and I want to come back to this argument because I think that are really easy argument as to why ice does have a right to rest, illegal immigrants when they occur the United States as a whole as a country illegally. It's a federal crime, so ices, going after people have already broken federal crimes. You get it. I stand, there still argument with dispensaries and some states wanting to make things legal one is not legal federally. What what? What we'll get? To that extent, I think

It's a good argument: their bullets. Reading the reports. U s. Immigration than customs enforcement agents reportedly violated a California state law that prohibits immigration officers from arresting undocumented immigrants without a judicial warrant on Tuesday. According to the appeal Two people were arrested in economic county superior court in northern the formula, one of whom was supposed to. Awaiting a hearing. This goes directly against assembly bill number six. Eight, the law that democratic. Are given Newsome signed in October, twenty nineteen. The bill reiterate: California's power to regular what occurs on state courthouse grounds and fundamentally declares that quote A person shall not be subject to civil arrest in a court house while attending a court proceeding or having legal business in a court house only the present A valid judicial warrant would allow officers either ice or other law enforcement tool, someone awaiting a hearing in California ICE justify

the arrest, the arrests by saying that California's lot does not supersede federal law. Which still grants immigration enforcement officers authority to arrest, remove aliens inside the United States. So I do think on our system, the federal government supersedes California, for the reason I you know up before when someone come in illegal to California. That's a crime against the entire country, not just caliph. One of the issues that we get to. It is, if California won't enforce their borders than you. Of all of these people in one under the country illegally using California, lacks security, and then just entering Country easily, because we don't have borders between states. I think I have an argument that many p I think I have a solution to this problem. That's gonna work for the left and the right and we'll get to where you gonna love. This quote, Our officers will not have their hands tied by sanctuary rules when in force Immigration laws to remove criminal aliens from our communities day

the Jennings ICES Field Office director in San Francisco said misstatements quoted in a peep Sonoma County District attorney Jill Red and San Francisco district attorney Chess Aboot in Peru, tested. The arrests ravage was quoted patch as saying ice, detention actions have no place in the court building where they have fact of scaring away witnesses and victims and undermines the district attorney's office ability to hold the guilty accountable and protect crime victims. It's actually a good point will address this. So now the county General Council Bruce Goldstein further called the arrests lawless, since no necessary judicial records were included both arrested manner from Mexico according to just in more a public our special was at the? U S: Department of Homeland Security, more exe. While the men had been arrested before tony overnight, as Lopez has pending charge. Against them, including domestic abuse, a D. Why and witness tampering lope. Also has prior convictions for in five do and a two thousand nine local ordnance conviction according to

for the other men arrested, was Pedro Romero acquire who occur. Two more also as five criminal convictions spending more than a decade, so just trespassing, driving without alike and send a DUI. It's a good argument. If you have a witness Someone whose only crime committed was illegal entry. Let's say there are dreamer, let's say there's someone who, just under the country illegally or overstate of ease up if they're gonna be a witness to a crime and help the criminal justice system put away some bad people. I can understand that argument if they think ice will come and deport them when they're trying to help the criminal justice system that can actually interfere. However, in this case bad argument, these guys are literally convicted criminals. One guy was actually got pending charges. They are being arrested because law enforcement is coming after them. For them having committed these crimes. But let's talk about my solution, I have a grand solution

a couple other I'm gonna bring into a bunch of other stories, because I think the Democrats have lost the plot on the border issue, but I was thinking about ten fifteen years ago or how long it was ago- and I was talking to friends about medicinal marijuana use in California. The state said we think this should be legal. Our people want to use this product. And the de. I would still go in and read these dispensaries, even though their operating legally under California law. The argument was that the federal law supersedes California as much as a bomb, a sad we're gonna stop doing this. They were still doing this and there is a good argument. If someone can go to these dispensaries and get easy access to lots of, you know federally banned substances, they can easily then cross state line and you know then breaking federal law having bought in the first place a breakdown of law, but then they can easily two other states. Where isn't legal, thus creating a problem for the federal government that is trying to regulate the substance

first and foremost, I dont think they should be regulating these things and glad to see that across the country we're getting a little bit more liberty and what people decide to do and there are private business now. Libertarian on the issue. I think you should. I think you should be some pretty. Have you restrictions, regulations on these kinds of things, but let's talk about immigration zombie chosen as an example the poor in front of us a lot. Format mad about it, but now we have something similar. It's different, ok, but the similarities. Here's my solution builder, water, her uncalled for bigger boom, problem solved in every capacity. If California wants to be assessed, sorry. State they're gonna have lacks border protections, they're not going to port people, then literally just put border checks around California, I'm not seriously saying we should do. It did be ridiculously expensive, but of Trump wants to build the Wall and California wanted here, too federal law and they're, making it easier for emigrants to come into the country and exploit you know: taxpayer resources and infrastructure. Will there,

problem solved. You solve the middle no marijuana problem. You solve the immigration problem. If somebody wants to buy somebody to spend, in California. They come that border checkpoints, there's gonna be a fellow border godsend: none, we ve walled off California. Now you don't need a passport to travel through shoe. You might You gotta prove you're an american citizen right because I'm trying to do I'm kidding by the way, but you get the point if California is creating the is opening doors to a lot of these problems and they won't enforce the law that negative impact negatively impact the rest of the country than what should the federal government due to deal with. This is an interesting question.

I think, when I was younger, I would have been much more in line with the defy the federal government and because I'm a milk, toast, liberal I've fallen more on the reform side. Vote. Fear you no vote for the people, you think will represent you properly and help pass the laws you want, but I gotta tell you some men just because I think certain substances should be legal doesn't mean they should be legal, because I recognise other people I agree and I think those people are wrong, but you know what I am not an emperor, I'm not God. My morality does not supersede literally anyone else's and I think a conversation. Intellectual debate is the right way to solve these issues. I would like to see this country become more liberty in mind in certain respects. But if someone disagrees me, I'm not gonna show up with it with you know, dude and Jack boats. That's what the left wants to do, apparently

we know that what they do they want to come. They want a common enforce their ideology with people wearing a ski masks with crowbar common people on the head. Now I think, of those people. I disagree with the best thing we can do is debate this and come to a cooperative conclusion. That's why I'm a lefty, libertarian I'm on a local compass, I'm pretty much a political liberal, because I recognise in a hard realities, but my idea of like a a good place to live, is convincing other people, not necessarily to agree with you that you're right, but to be willing to work with you and give you a chance. There are certain instances where, to a conservative and say: ok, I'm not gonna win this one. That's let's do this. Let's try your way, let's see how it goes and if it works out back off. Let's try this one other thing my way and if it works, then you back off. That's that's com, reminds and figured out of work together, even though we know we disagree, the challenges, the increasing polarization

but here is just want to show you. The left has absolutely drifted far far away very far away. The parties have flipped the new Yorker the New York. Ok. This is like a left to avert pretty leftwing publication, the case for open borders, a kitchen from my sturdy in a new Graphic Nonfiction book, a libertarian economist conjures. An alternate alternative reality in which Migration is unlimited all over the world. What Bernie Sanders and twenty fifteen said open brought. Borders is a Coke brothers proposal and now here we are. We know that there are liberty, Ryan's. You know free market people. Very, you know go right. Wing, Reverend column, saying open borders, a good thing and imaginary borders. Don't make sense all this stuff, yadda yadda, I disagree. I think borders are designed to protect a community of people who have you know?

share resources and common interests. Things like that. Do we want global access to everything I think in the future, to be great If we were a unified under a set of you, know founding principles that people could agree to, but here's the problem, the principles I want and agree with our american- and we have this great thing- called the bill of rights, the constitution, all that good stuff. While countries don't have that in some countries go to prison for the joke. I do not want these. You know out what dangerous idea, logs smugglers and criminals, exploiting my community building the wall. The answer- I don't know you don't look There are a good argument in the laughter than its expensive sure I guess, but we can do it so I know, but I do think we're Americans and we're not yet at the utopian future. These people think they will have with open borders. This story from the new Yorker Autonomy libertarians view on it and that's fine, but rotarian view is economic they're talking about how p

would be able to freely move about work and open businesses in other places, but which are not considering are the loop tick idea logs, who want to strip away civil rights from people. Look in Amerika we grant civil rights and equal access to people of varying marginalized greenow positions. To put it mildly. There. It was nineteen sixty seven that modulation laws were finally struck down by the Supreme Court, allowing my family to have free access to this great country, which is supposed to be free for everybody. All men grated equal, yet we had gender segregate. We know we have. We had like gender segregation in civics voting rights. Things like that when a woman suffrage, we add racial tenants going back hundreds of years we're going one of these things were improving, we're doing a really really really great job of it. In my opinion, but there are many places in the world that dont grant these civil rights to people. Some of these people are dangerous zealots who had come here and do very dangerous things, so you know what we decided, because we are not a global unit.

World we have borders for more reasons than just economics, notably this first story. Ice arrested, undocumented immigrants, who had already committed several crimes like driving, drunk, look man, it's bad enough. We have to deal with our own citizens who commit crimes, but why would we open the door to others, people not a part of our community to commit crimes? Here we say: listen! Thereupon. The people were born here who are part of our community who grew up with our culture. We don't like they commit crimes, but you know what they're from here, and we have to figure out how to deal with those people. But if you come here as a guest from somewhere else committing crimes, not you get in the boat. Sorry and you ve taken advantage of our good will. But here's work- it's even I guess stranger illegal immigrants in Cambridge won't be arrested for unlicensed driving are, are you? Are you kidding? What would you would you mean?

Regular Americans can get arrested for not driving without a license. So now there there there there increasingly pushing the barrier over it. Look we're headed towards lawlessness. I know it's a bit hyperbolic. It may be exaggerating but you're literally saying like well. These people can break the law on don't arrest them. That's literally California, saying these people have broken the law and we don't worry law enforcement to arrest them. So we made a law saying: federal agents can actually arrest criminals. People who violated federal. What's I'll tell you I'm in one of an argument about State lovers, federal law, I'm listening, but can the state actually tell the feds the feds aren't legally allowed to enforce federal law? I don't think so, like the argument about the dispensaries. Is that California,

Spencer, is our good? How much shirked out I'm pretty sure as not it's not that not the case at Californian law sang the feds can't enforced federal law against us. They just said we want this legal and the feds came an enforced federal law anyway. This is different. This them saying the feds literally broke state law, or I told you wanna do California want to secede. I gotta be honest. A lot of people in this country won't care if you did, and maybe them will actually have to build a border barrier around Californian Rush, United States. Interestingly, Mc Mulvaney recently said that the? U S is desperate for more legal immigrants, and I do want to wait a little bit about this, because I then what could it? Because legal immigrants are very different from illegal immigrants and is an important point and a lot of people are trying to use this to climate like discredits trump, because the narrative game they play on the left is that they combine illegal and legal immigrants into the same category and they're. Not the people in California who committed several crimes include ably felonies or be

deported, are not the same as a hard working legal immigrant who want to come to the? U S, to get a good job. So I'm going to read the lead here. They say: acting White Ass, chief of staff, Mc Mulvaney told a crowded, upright gathering in England on Wednesday night at the trumpet ministries It needs more emigrants for the? U S, economy, to continue growing according to an audio holding up his remarks obtained by the Washington post. He said we are desperate, desperate for more people. We are running out of people to feel the echo. Growth that we ve had in our nation of the last four years. We need more immigrants. The trumpet Minister we want those immigrants to come in illegal fashion? Mulvaney said accorded recalling what makes a whole lot of sense. To be honest, now there are a lot of people who don't want immigration period. Trumps talked about, let everybody come in, but legally legally. He says, This good news by curbing illegal immigration as as as much as Trump has done. There is now going to be an expert. To expedite the process of bringing legal immigrants to think of it? This way, if you have a thousand p

waiting in line to coming to this country. And the U S saying we can't, because the people who jumped the line are clogging up the system. Now that truck stop that we can actually move illegal immigrants faster and better track was coming and where they can work, what they can do and that's it good thing? That's a great thing. We also make sure we're not gonna get criminals and people who might be on vaccinated or sick. This is exactly what we wanted to happen, so it makes sense

of course, the last thing I ll end on. As we talk about the weird world of immigration today, protesters are rampant. Nevada democratic debate were immigrants, rights activists. This is this is this is the thing that gets me confused the most, how we went from the Obama administration and twenty sixteen to now about four years later, look at more than a limit less than four years later, and what Obama did is considered wrong. They are bowing Biden, Biden, apologizing sang. It was a mistake. We should have done it. Maybe that's why Barack Obama won't endorse Joe Biden, because Biden is supposed to be the moderate, but he's actually rejecting the policies of the Obama administration. What happened in these few years that made everyone on the left lose their minds? I think

No matter what trump does it's bad? So, when John Stewart from the daily show now retired chiseling called Baltimore an asshole, they laughed cause John Stewart Good funny man good right when Donald Trump says the same thing. They called tromp racist. So now that Donald Trump ascend, we got curb emigration, but people can come here legally. They had to tell him that was bad. They have nothing to offer the american people, so the only thing they think they can do is contrast tromp with conflicting policy ideas that Americans don't care, for. I think Donald trumps is characters is makes people uneasy, but when it comes to policy, he's actually grabbed a lot of what Americans want to see happen. So the only thing Democrats can do and offering a policy is to say the Orange man, bad everything he offers is batten, Alice I'll, tell you what the Democrats should have done is complemented Donald Trump Policy and criticized his

Havre and the character that he brings to the White House and I'd be willing to bet they'd when to bed. They couldn't do it, though they were too busy spinning around in circles, because Donald Trump tweets and place them like like a cheat violin. He knows lower to say to keep them off base and its work the entire time. So the democrats- you report you so that all around us all up- ok

Let me let me know what you think actually cause. As one of you knows, forehead scratch, or to me I mean this: should the federal government have a right to supersede state law? Think about the two, a argument in Virginia with certain districts saying we're not could enforce these state laws? Should the smaller jurisdictions have a right to say no way these laws are unjust and is it wrong for the feds to come and arrest people I'll, throw to you my opinion and in the end? This is that if these people have committed crimes by entering the country illegally and then by actually committing felonies, I dont think California should be up to be able to pass a law telling federal law enforcement agencies are not allowed to enforce laws. If California wants to make with these men did legal. California can do that. I think the feds can still enforce it. If you want to change, have a conversation and sea will change, but I leave their stick around next augments, coming up at four p m at Youtube: com slashed him gases. My other channel that will see well, then never forget that in the media, world framing is everything they can tell

something really really good in a bad way to make. It seem like it's bad when it's actually really good case in point black support for Donald Trump this NBC News story, it's a pole, actually talks about the the great game. Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden have made with black voters nationally sang Sanders, ground on binding with black voters nationally trumps approval rain with black voters, stands at just fourteen percent, just fourteen percent. It's the work just I find interesting in awhile what what? What? What percentage of the black Vote Donald Trump receive in twenty sixteen eight percent He is merely doubled his support in the black community, and not only that the story shows that he literally, he basically doubled his support among black? men standing at around twenty four percent- that's huge that's absolutely huge, Lukman trumps, not perfect, but

What always drives me, what we're the biggest motivations I have for you, no political commentary is the media lies about what's going on and they do it in sneaky ways. They they they take data. That's really really good vote, campaign and you make it sound bad. What's right, story and I've got some some other tweets I'll show you actually yeah. Ok, anyway, they say is Adam Credit primary battle turns to stay with more racial diversity than the first to nominate contest in our New Hampshire, newly released from the enemies from NBC News. Walter Journal Pole finds that Vermont Bernie Sanders now enjoy similar levels of support among black democratic primary voters as former vice President Joe Biden does, while all of their other, What's with the exception of former New York City mayor, my Bloomberg have the gain any meaningful traction with the crucial bloody voting block. Absolutely important point out as well. It's very, very good news for Bernie Sanders who struggled to gain support among the black community. So, as we can see, that is good news, but they're not framing it s, bad news.

I mean, maybe later in the story, will be more fair tromp. But of course framing is the net is, is the name of the game are three more? but the same Paul also shows that all black registered voters give President I'll approval, writing of just fourteen percent, and they overwhelming leech chose they wouldn't they would, I've overwhelmingly chose any of the Democratic Kennedy over him and a general election. Now there is not a direct correlation between approval writing and Donald Trump. What does that mean? They give him an approval. Writing a fourteen percent. Does that mean that someone is on a scale of one two hundred how much they oppose the president or up disapproval at fourteen? Or is it that way ask a hundred people. Fourteen percent said they support Donald Trump, Pretty sure approval? Writing is calculated by asking people if they generally applied

so they do something where they'll say like somewhat approve slightly approve disapprove. You know that you are those things work if fourteen percent say they approve of Donald Trump, but last time The eight percent voted it's good news that they should be riding like. Interestingly, Donald Trump Support has increased since a twenty sixteen election now sitting around fourteen percent and while low it does show that Donald Trump efforts to gain ground among the black community is paying off. Least somewhat, maybe not as much as he actually wants, but he's done trauma east, very, very hard to gain ground in this manner. Now, when you look at the actual data parentage, twenty four percent men, which shows probably Congo, West's impact I mean it- I'm not trying to downplay only anything here can you was extremely influential and popular among a lot of people out the black community. Kenya was probably a massive impact on dollar trumps approval writing whether anyone wants to admit it or not. Deeds famous, especially

among evangelicals and the evangelical black community. There was a really really. Awesome video I saw. Where can you brought in Ceuta and she sang a gospel version of I think what was what would a camera? What's on your husband was really really cool. That's influence! That's going to work, that's gonna, help droplets read more. They say according to the newly released data by and has the support of thirty one percent of black democratic primary voters, while sand captures the backing of twenty nine percent The NBC News Wall Street Journal Paul using over sample of black voters to gain greater insight into their views, the twenty twenty field, because the margin of error, black democratic, primary voters alone. Samples of a hundred. Thirty nine respondents stands at a high eight point: three one percent: it is difficult to differentiate the true levels of support for each of the candidates, so, theoretically Trump could have no support or massive support. I sure will we'll see how things turn out. Still the close margin shows that Sanders has made inroads in a community previously dominated by Biden. Aggregated data from

nineteen shows that Biden led Sanders among these voters by as much as thirty percentage point and NBC News Wall Street Journal a national Poles last year. Bloom who s saturated the tv and radio airwaves with more than in a million dollars in personal spending. Less ten weeks received about half as much support with black primary voters as either Biden or Sanders, while all other democratic candidates were mired in single digits, so, unlike on super interested in Whereat with club, which are or or or Buddha judge. I really want down to the Donald Trump numbers. They say this, while the all may show muted enthusiasm for much of the democratic field among black voters. One candidate elicits particularly strong disapproval present Donald Trump. Trumps approval. Writing among among all black photo, stands at just fourteen percent with eighty four percent disapproving, including sixty nine percent who say they disapprove of him strongly

President fair, slightly better and their ratings of his economic performance, with twenty three percent approving and sixty two percent disapproving of how he handles the economy, which brings me to the big question when it comes to elections. If you hate somebody will you vote for the economy? You might disapprove of Donald Trump, but if twenty three percent of proof of the economy and that's what they're really after I thought they'll still pull the lever for Donald Trump among all black voters. Nearly eight and ten say they are very uncomfortable, his candidacy for President twenty twenty. There is a significant gender gap in views of the president among black men. Twenty four percent approve seventy four. Seventy two percent disapprove. All among black women, just six percent approve and ninety three percent disapprove. You know a hard truth for a lot of people on the right is that women don't like Trump Think bench appears at something about it. People on the right got mad. It's true.

Nearly seventy percent of monuments are Democrats because they do not like Donald Trump, think he's gross, and there is a big it. I just did a sit down You two were aerial scar, Zella, who announced she was leaving the left, and she said tromp is bad on women. I think that's one of trumps weaknesses. I don't know how we improve that, because its trump, but I think you can see the data now. Look. This information and is still really good news for tromp, because previous data suggested that Trump had four percent approval among black women. So even that is up and about fifty percent. But the twenty four percent approval for Donald Trump among man, that's that's pretty incredible. Amish worrisome tweets year, Abbe De Philip he's seen and political correspondent tweeted. Looking close. We are thus NBC Wall Street Journal, Paul of black voters, the gap between black man in black women in their path, full of tromp is very notable different measurement.

But it is a much larger gap that exists in twenty sixteen example. Twenty four percent of black men approve Trump six per cent of black women, so they highlight that section. I just showed you take a look at this graph race engender exit pole. We can see that black men for Tromp thirteen percent and black women for peace and I know they're not the same numbers very, very important point out. These are people who actually voted approval. Doesn't necessarily mean they're going to vote or not vote, but I think it's fair to say if people are more likely to approve of tromp on economics. I think economics can be driving factor for people in Poland, Africa's money talks and BS walks, social links to the pool, but We then have this tweet from Michael Mc Atoms, who is national press secretary for the and our cc sang the take away, is real

Donald Trump, has nearly doubled. His approval among black men, if this holds he's nearly guaranteed reelection, is fascinating. The saying goes that if Republican can get twenty percent support among the black community, a Democrat, he'll, never win again. I know they say the again. I think it is basically means if tromp can get around twenty percent. He one hears thing he's a fourteen percent, so the guarantee ok, he's six points off his guaranteed reelection, but you combine the economy moderate swinging for tromp, pushing away from the left with fourteen percent approval among the black community, and I think it stands to reason. Trumps guarantee is their source. They will more time he's not at twenty four

but fourteen is still really really close, with a long way to go until the November elections. And if the Democrats keep plain silly games and if tromp keeps pushing on his campaign to speak with black voters, I think he's going to be successful in cracking that twenty percent number keeping in mind three other poles have trumpet thirty six percent. This is the outlier. Well, actually, the three maybe outliers, I'm not sure, retarded it's hard to know because a lot of poles, but when you have three different poles showing around thirty percent support, you can't describe them as just static ripe ever so. Often in all of our report and you'll find one spikes or dips really hard in a certain direction, and you gotta be careful way. Aggregates are important, but this is now another Paul. It's not it's not nearly the same thing as half as much support as they Emerson did, but it is showing that Trump,

think, if we're going to calculate a margin of error with repulsing he's above twenty percent once and he slightly below- think it's fair to say he's probably at that number Democrats will never win if they lose a tiny fraction of the black community. They say unhappily pipe hypothetical had had match. Ups overwhelming majority of these voters also say they would choose the democratic candidate. Joe Biden lead with them over Trump. Eighty nine percent to eight percent sanders some eighty seven to seven and Bloomberg leads him. Eighty four to eleven club, our and Buddha Judge Fair slightly worse, but would still enjoy about three quarters of black support in these match. Ups Buddha judge leads over Trump seventy five percent, the sixteen which our lead seventy seven to fifteen, I guess we could only wait because we're still just about eight and a half nine months away from truly figuring out what happens?

I'm not gonna tall. You right now time flies time. Absolutely flies feels like just yesterday. The guy got elected. Actually, I don't know it's kind of crazy we're getting really really close to see that the actual you know I guess vision of the american people. The media can tell us everything in the world, but November will be the true deciding factor. Are the american people happy with Donald Trump or are they upset with him? The vote will speak in the vote. Tell us, that's it's just that the media can say whatever they want. None of it means anything everything. I say meaningless. We're gonna see truly how people feel come reelection time. Stick around next islands coming up in a few minutes, and I will see you all shortly. Of course, because of the way I title this video, I had two it's the story. A lot of people are going to be really really angry and probably all of the feminists, because in this story from

I can say story but report from Blend Guerre Phd psychology. Today, women, the gene, There are causing the shift in politics in political discourse in social justice attitudes, cancel culture, people getting banned from colleges. These things are directly correlated to gender and because too, Women dominate higher education, we are seeing more of these things occur. It's actually enter singly, biologically democratic, gets kind of weird when you have slightly more than fifty percent of a particular body being female, they vote for certain things. These things and it happened up happening sexual interesting, but I could be framing it poorly. Let me just read for you, this gendered values in higher education, universities. Gone through enormous shifts in basic values. Now this individual Glenn, clue. They trigger warning, say saying that,

I'm going to begin as article potential represent a potentially uncomfortable argument: the Russia, this art we'll try to convince you, there might be something to it. The argument, without, understanding, the role of gender demographic changes and higher education. It will be impossible to fully understand many of the modern social movements like trigger warnings. This invitations, safe spaces on college campuses here for me this I'll start with a noteworthy event in a college class at some point, the converse, in the class turned to one particular prominence psychologist who had made some comments that could be interpreted as ethically ethically questionable one student, the class indicated at the scholar, should not be invited to two to college campuses. Speak in light of the ethically questionable ideas that he had reportedly expressed in one of his writings. My peers expression of outrage, led to a quite quiet, see

nodding, heads and supportive gestures at that point. In my academic career, I did not know what to think by the end of the class period, based on not having actually read materials related to this report, an incident and having no counter argument postulated. We had a son We come to the conclusion that the outrage student was right. This party the scholar should have been banned. Campus writ large, we were metaphorically asking for his head the background. They say some of you may find find the store. Pricing. Some may agree with the viewpoint of the students someday. Italy disagree. I absolutely disagree brain at ideas. Let's be that I just hope and some you think I am beating at horse. But regardless of one's belief, I have come to realise this anecdote embodies a deep, ongoing politicize debate regarding political correctness and free speech on American College. Purposes. The rise of speakers, invitations, the use of

spaces and trigger warnings. The increasing liberalism, homogeneity encompasses the complex relationship between emotion and reason, and fears of shifting educational values and of a coddled new generation. College students. I must not right here, Mr Glenn Alot of people who are listening to me speak right how are probably rolling there I sang TIM. We all already knew this. You know why, because seventy per and of millennium women are Democrats. Ok, it's actually sixty eight percent by last tracking those pew Research and its those people that are typically opposed to free speech who want hate speech was who want trigger warnings, it's not conservatives and though the millennial left is dominated by women. So the point this guy is going to make she actually has data to Support- is that certain characteristics that are that tend to appear more in women are the same traits that people who are social

Let us warriors share, therefore: it's not one hundred percent that if you're a woman you'll feel these ways or if your manual feel certain ways, but that women tend to be agreeable and emotion and less emotionally stable than men and people who are agreeable. Less emotionally stable, tend to be social justice activists. Well, I'm Let me read for you. He goes on to say thereof. There have been many different causal Donations for these movements on campuses, but one landmark diagnosis of this new age college culture was delivered in Gregg, Lucan, Offs and Jonathan Heights the coddling of the american mind, that's the reason book stronger I should have a right of myself, but I hear great things rooted in technological overload over parenting, lack of free play, high stakes, testing, political polarisation, foremost university policy and left leaning, ideological agendas, the authors argot the current generation of undergraduate college students, have been raised in a way that is uniquely position.

To embrace a culture of victimization. In other words, agenda action of students who determine truth for subjective feelings, are highly centre two emotional slights and feel the need to protect the marginalized above and beyond. All else. Let me also add that capitalism plays a role here, as does social policy welfare policy, but the capitalism slant is that when these whiny babies, screech that someone said a naughty word or has a bad idea. The people who run the college, say the car. Denmark is always right and cater to the students. Instead of being authority, figures who say our product as discipline and intelligence, knowledge and training, they say: look man wore a business that wants to make money you're the customer will do whatever you want

It's happening. Why any student comes in and says burn the book and they say you're paying the bills will do whatever you say they shouldn't do that it's a bad product. Now these kids parents need to step in when the sorts happening, but they don't because a lot of what Jonathan Height and gradual lucky enough programme has a name. Look look: look offs, research, the cobbling of american mine, snowplow parents, all true the combination of all these facts. But what's my married, he says they posited at the emotional and social needs of students have taken precedence over other academic goals, such as the freedom of intellectual exchange height. Additionally, argue that emotional and social values are also taking precedence over the value of pursuing truth on the other, and critics have argued that Lucan often height are on them. Are off the mark. These writers positive that one the relationship between helicopter parenting, lack of free pay play an emotional for. Kennedy would mostly apply to economically privileged students that other mac-

level causal factors of students, emotional turmoil, we're not addressed like things like student at and three, the historical disenfranchisement of distinct student populations in universities must be taken into account. When trying to understand the current social movements on campuses, the point he's bring up is basically that we looked at all. All of these different factors and argued, but what we did actually look at was gender changes because its act, We are fairly recent phenomenon that the majority of the student body has become female. I dont think gender play is necessarily a predominant role in whether or not these things will emerge. I think it's a combination of all the factors, because, even if you had forty eight percent female, while of course they would still bring these things up if they were concerns, the reality is in combination with a majority female student body and snowplow parenting entitlement

and a capitalist at enterprise that seeks to gouged students with massive student loans and then give them whatever they want that have actually teaching them. You have a corrupt disgusting system that is failing, but I really think it's fair to point out. As much as he found a causation link between social justice and and and gender we know or or a biological sex. I really don't see it is playing a huge role, because if the universities maintained authority and said, oh here's what we do and why we do it, then it doesn't matter what the make up of the student body is. It's not you see like I grew up on a sausage cargo where you had all girls, high schools, they weren't overly social justice oriented. It was because there was an authority figure telling them here's what you shouldn't shouldn't do, but high schools aren't for profit businesses and colleges typically are coming to a certain degree of this public holidays. But a lot of colleges require you to choose to send your kid there or

choose to go there and pay money. That system means that the customer will always be right. Maybe it's because you have a majority student body another as female, but in the end it really comes down to the people who run the system and they say yes or no. They could easily say we're, not changing these rules and is inviting people stop crying and a people don't want to com. You can leave Bob I, but now they whatever you say dear will, give you, wherever you want, So here's what you did he did it needed a study. He asked about five different moral positions. You know, should someone come because it doesn't matter how people feel should someone come in the pursuit of economic truth etc? what we found is that is, as always, the port to address what we can and cant connect from these results. First, our food things were correlation, or rather than causation, ok, now to make sure that I think I may have got it wrong, he found a correlation. Not accusation is unclear the result from our study directly course

to behaviour in the real world and three, our measures of academic values, our novel and meet replication, so It is nevertheless, with these limitations in mind. We generally found that modern college students put a lot of emphasis on their own emotional, well being as a value. Their education and this study, while my students were generation Z he does mention is a lot of more data, and thus I was able to bear the economic values of younger adult students, verses older students, so putting the pieces together. I'm trying to go quick, the result, support many of Luke When Heights claims regarding the political and social attitudes of university students, specific, The conservatism played a central central role in predicting all academic values and was the most salient predict Social justice and emotional well being values further generate differences in the value of social justice and emotional while being were present. Importantly, we damage

waited and now argue that look enough height and other commentators have missed a critical factor. Gender he's has over the past fifty years. The gender demographics of college campuses have, changed enormously. The ratio between men and women were forty eight to us, I'm sorry, fifty eight to forty two percent in nineteen seventies, while a recent pawn twenty seventeen showed that women now comprise approximately fifty six percent of the college population, in other words the gender majority of college students in United States as reversed over the past five years. This demographic change matters because extensive research has shown substantial differences in personality traits. Conservative and value orientation between men and women. Women too, to be more liberal than men, sky, higher on measures of agreeableness and openness and have lower. Scores on emotional stability and the ratio women to men in social Sciences is far grey when the ratio in the hard Sciences, so that's like psychology versus they stem importantly

research demonstrated that one higher agreeableness predicted higher ratings towards social justice and emotional well being here to that lower emotional stability predicted higher scores, of the an emotional well being and social justice and three lower scores conservatism predicted hires wars, unemotional well being and social justice and lower on advancing knowledge and academic rigour. For that hard sign major scored, higher and advancing knowledge and economic rigour and lower, and social justice and emotional well being, in other words, the constellation of factors that predicts things such strong values, unemotional well being and social justice. All are conflated with gender generally compared with men men tend to hold these values without accounting for gender differences. We mean a central link that appears to connect these disparate trends. I'm gonna keep it Rahman Rapid appear because I try to keep these short. What what he is saying,

that we have at least one preliminary study showing gender plays a role in the politics of these universities. But what I find truly fascinating is the economic policy that results from this desire for emotional wellbeing. If men are working and stem and women our in psych. It's not no surprise that the social justice activists don't want to go to Mars and the men do. It seems You have an extreme hippy dippy laughed a female perspective of being a happy family on a farm and smiling, and then you have a more aggressive capitalistic. Male perspective of conquering the world in travelling to the star, and then there is a saying rational in between, but I think this is a really important point to be made and we can talk about snowplow parenting. All the time It seems like there is some correlation between traits typically found in women, which may be social. I'm not saying that there are totally biological, maybe a little bit, both theirs

relation here between the rise of social justice, obviously feminism and gender. I know a lot of people think it's obvious, because he saw these trends in politics, but now we have some hardy I'll leave it there take a photo well stick around. I've got another video coming up in a few minutes, and I will see you all shortly: the story was truly silly and kind of funny the woman who treated it was being silly and it was and of a joke, so I saw the silliness of it. I had a chuckle to myself and I moved on, but then something interesting happened. The story became increasingly viral. Let me tell you what the story is. Women's very strange first date sparks twitter debate. I know want to feel that way again, a romance author shared a first date mishap on Twitter last week to very mixed reactions: Alisha re POE.

That, on the day before Valentine's day, she went on a first date at a coffee shop. Everything was fine up until her date went up to the front count front counter to grab their drink order and returned with two treats for himself. That's the story, It actually got picked up by Yahoo and, of course, Alisha was being silly, but of course, on the internet everything's, literal, so here's what she tweeted. And it was. This is amazing to me that this went viral. She's got twenty thousand followers, so she's, not a random nobody's, got these Thank you said yesterday I met a guy for coffee and he asked what I'd like to drink and went and fetched the order, and he came back with to kick. Ups and I was like all that's cute and then he ate them both in front of me so like he's, clearly a monster right, obviously she's joking, I can't believe people thought this

was serious, but apparently people dead and others have only joke. I do think it's funny circumstance that shines a lot on something interesting. What's funny about this, when she says he's a monster, is not that he's really a monster? It's that he bought two cake pops and ate him. It was rooted inconsiderate, which truly fair, But the story, though, as you may have caught from the title, is that pronoun twitter, not every single one of them, but the people who put their pronouns in a twitter account are supposed to be International feminists fighting for equality actually are complete meaning about this guy's a hold on a second, this, a blue my mind. First, I want to make very, very clear, Alisha RE was being silly and I'm surprised right. I'm sorry. I think people are taking your weight to seriously at the joke as funny he's a monster because eight, a cake pop, that's the joke, he's not really a monster, but their p. Oh I'm not gonna, go through every single one, and I want to single out

like singling out small twitter account whatever, but I checked a few of them sure enough. There, international feminists, with pronouns in their accounts, and they're saying things like. Let me explain to you why this man was so rude and why this was wrong. There's a twenty about it. I am confused by this desire for equality, but then a demand for a chivalry man to procure you treat when you didn't even ask for it. There was a story that I covered you. This was maybe we go about a feminist sociologist who interviewed a bunch of men and women in Silicon Valley Francisco and found that, although they basically all said they were feminists when it came to dating they default to traditional gender roles. Now now, that's fast. Dating right that you have a woman who says I want to be in an egalitarian relationship of equals, my partner, but that you straight up says he's gotta pay the bills he needs to be in control. All of those things.

I also saw day another study of Sweden. That said when women get promotions there more likely to divorce. So we certainly have all an end is not true for men. This the same is true, for men went one, then manga promotions likely of divorce and not go up, stands to reason that when it comes to relationships, people like traditional gender roles, maybe the social contract. Whatever I made an ardent, I'm saying that this is the data they found. You would think that the people on the further left of the spectrum. The pronoun bunch who have unique pronouns I've made up and talk about all this crazy intersection, Amity inequality and opposing oppression. Would woods would would push back on this woman's cake pops? Laurie and say the man was under no obligation to give you a cake, but because you are strong women right now, the rapidly once again defaulting to traditional gender roles, the man

should have gotten you the treat he should have unprompted, provided you with a cake pop now look. A part of this is actually quite simple if any one man or woman date or otherwise shows up with a bunch of food. Is it in front of you? You might think its rude, but I don't think that's the case here. First of all, she's talking about a date and, second of all, if my he walked in eating candy. I wouldn't be shocked that he didn't give me any, but if you're on a date with someone, you expect them to share your here to share a moment to spend some time together, but sure enough. The people who are supposed to be the locusts default and claim the mansion done. The right thing. I think this says something: I'm not gonna pretend like its scientific data, but they chose money. These people are hypocrites bullies and they often just want power case in point. The fact that these people are responding, saying you're right, he's a monster. Now I get a lot of people are being silly, but hear me up if someone is gonna claim that the man was wrong for doing acts latte there like a man called me, you know he whistled at me.

That was wrong. Ok, sure, let's let let's say they re going to defend that women should take charge and be in control. But then, in this circumstance, when it's a network pointed at a negative direction, they take the scent a stance pointing than negative reactions to limit. Let me try and clarifies what one front essays no matter what the circumstances there on the I just side and the other person is bad and wrong. They can simply be, like you do in this instance, I think the guy was actually right now the menace wrong, no matter what So Alisha says it's a whole day, almost twenty four hours later. Still marveling over this man who was on a date and by two to hold cake pops, which is equal to the number of people. When this date and doesn't, for a single cake pop too said date. I think the tweets funny, I think, she's being funny. I think it is funny. But I am surprised that so many people take it seriously and its lemme tell you there's it's not concern

I will actually knife out of the back. There might be some cause, the more traditional view with the more conservative you at the man should be buying food for his date. She said I never want to feel that way again. I should add we're valentines cake pops with little hearts. Hunt them if you like, my tweets than promotes are book which is peep with people on Twitter. Do so, if you're part of the humorless Twitter, and have decided to spend days. Berating me for being clearly the wards world's least ambitious gold digger. You may not like my books or really anything, I M I'm sorry. Now here's the crazy thing to me. There's actually people call being that she is being like entitled for joking about not getting a cake pop look man. This should just be proof that everyone is insane but level. Just get to the point here. I've I've another store, I wanna go through in a similar vein. I will stress that she is telling a joke. Please everyone, calm down

so dumb, but the point I'm seeing here is that this is another bit of anecdote. Evidence alongside the data that I presented before at Stockholm study that no matter what someone might claim they really want. What did what the data tends to find that people default to traditional gender calls for better or for worse a month, and it should it shouldn't. Be that way. I'm saying the replies to these and I want to show onawandah you no single up specific accounts. I get so much flat for doing it, but there the pronoun twitter sang the man should have given you and I'm just like. You know what men, because I've been on data feminists before and they do All of this they expect me to do the masculine chivalrous hold the door pull the chair and, unlike we gotta hear guy into another. Perhaps ok now actually do so that sometimes but saw it brings me to a totally different story that I thought would be fun to and because it it's just silly nonsense and we're gonna, you know we're going to go through some of these posts that I find funding. The daily The stories as dating in your thirties is just waiting for the good ones to get divorced. Free

Strayed Singleton reveal how much harder it is to find love when you leave or twenties behind. They say the course of True love never did run smooth, but for some singleton it seems dating a stricter than ever people from around world revealed their candid frustrations about dating in their third. He's an anonymous thread shared on whisper among the admissions, is one a new set of trying to find a good catch in your thirty's is like finding Peter PAN Neverland another person called dating rough and said they were just waiting for all the good ones to get divorced. I'm gonna be offensive right now, so I hope your prepared all eight percent of the women who watch my videos, but I'm pretty sure most of these posts are from women because the guy eyes. War posting a really, obviously guys and it doesn't sound like they're having trouble dating in their thirties and its because guys date down and have access to resources. They have no trouble attracting younger women, for the most part the first one they say, denning authorities just wait to get divorced dating intimate thirty's.

Going to a grocery store midnight before they ve restocked, all the good stuff is gone and everything else is picked over undamaged. Maybe you might find something I think that could apply to men and women, but because men typically date down. I do think this is mostly women just posted about how they're not find in deeds. Here's one says thirty's get laid easy, finding love nearly impossible yeah, but you gotta be osity, that's true, no matter what it's always been easy to go on a fling and find date. Finding true love has always been been a challenge accept. I guess, if you give it a more traditional environment where you literally grow up with a small pool of individuals, have no most of your life early thirties dating poor shallower, dirtier, judgmental and packed with unwanted baggage. However, by mid thirties, it goes the flow. Thank God.

This person says they deleted their facebook in their own Dayton and real and in real life. This once, as I have to admit, meeting men in my thirties is so freaking easy and fun. Confidence comes at age, Ladys, I'm in the prime of my life nazi that bucks. The trend that you'd imagine based on the data must be harder, but hey, not true for everybody right once you are thirty tables, turnin dating men, will be looking for younger off younger and women you're looking for younger. Women and authorities realized they are losing their looks and we'll settle in many occasions, God that seems like a maybe written by a man. I thought Atm authorities would be easier but is actually harder. I miss having a job you in connection with someone there's one says dating as a single mom rough, but there's one. I really want to get to Cypher s. If you know I wanted it to one this one says ever since I hit my thirty's. I swear the eighteen to twenty two year olds are consistently more attracted to me. Working out eating healthy and staying single has been good to me. And the last one says dating authorities will have the last one, but getting authorities like

I find the least broken appliance and a threat store. Here's what I want to highlight. I want to highlight this. One look man. There are differences in gender and dating all that stuff, but all that really matters is that you eat you exercise and you're going to stay single, but I'll, be in the exercise and take care of yourself don't freak out. If someone doesn't give you a cake pop or if you think that if someone should have given someone gave up. I don't know I just now we fund to cover this we're dating story, because I see a paradox here. Long story short, I could hardly be shorter. I just have this personal experience. What I think the cake pop stories kind of silly, because I mentioned a moment ago, I've dated feminists who wanted me to be masculine. One to be the man in the relationship, and I find it hilarious, no problem. I will. I actually actually appreciate that, but it's weird that you're gonna preach feminism and being a feminist and wanting equality, but then expect me to be,