A couple days ago, House Democrats officially voted to impeach Donald Trump and immediately the media ran the headlines. Trump is impeached, Wikipedia publishes Trump is impeached, but that may just be media shorthand because trot is actually arguing. He has not impeached, try lawyers? Ask if policy delay means he isn't impeached. Yet you see the idea diplomacy out was that she would not trans the articles of impeachment to the Senate, but the constitution clear the house. As the sole ability to impeach and the Senate as the sole ability to hold the impeachment trial. Trumps. Lawyers are arguing if a Senate hasn't receive them. The impeachment formalised now many people will say it is a dirty trick. It is tromp he's desperate. He doesn't want to be peachy so angry, but in reality I'm sorry it's show the Democrats STAR Witness one of their star witnesses is Harvard professor.

Legal scholar who said trot should be impeached published this opinion. Piecing trump is not Until the house tells the Senate, I will bear the leaves got sexually quite simple. He said a vote is not impeachment. Impeachment is the process, by which the house confirms it and then tell was the Senate by gold. To the Senate and conforming impeachment. Here and now you must try the president so long. Nancy Pelosi holds up. The articles. Impeachment never happened. So I say I find this whole thing quite confusing, but I'm. Looking at the latest news reactions to the left and the evidence, it seems like the real goal may not have been too even dig up bad press on the president. I think what and see may have actually been trying to do was say she ate the blood lost of the left us to demanded the impeachment of the president, many of whom don't realize that impede, but does not mean removal, so I'm not to go through here, let's break down

I tell you this right now what Noah parliament is saying, is action fascinating It makes a lot of sense when you think about it. I think for all intents and purposes we understand they impeached the president, but I think for him Thorkel and legal context. We have to conclude today. Donald Trump has not been impeached. Unless our until the house can fly? by sending their managers trans many the documents and setting. It is official. Think about it. This way, if the house votes on a bill, but then the biggest one of the trail and the biggest one in the trash did they really pass the bill. I know it's pollio bad analogy, but the ideas there's more the process of passing. Something then saying we agree to do. It is actually gotta be a bill and some confirmation the Bell exists and is moving forward. So what's read the news before we get started had written yes dot. If you would like to support my work as a my workers, pay crypto option a option of physical address, but the best thing you can do is share this video and this one this one

it's gonna be contentious. Can I tell you this right now: people who like Trump resistance activists are not going to like this. Video there probably not going to touch it. Ok, so if you are watching it, if you did, I really respect that you decide to give us for your chance, I'm I'm telling you you should like or not like the present, I'm just letting you know. Noah Feldman is a Democrat, witness he testified then he is telling you right now they did not impede the president. Donald Trump is still. The president has not been nor has he been impeached simply because they are. That's a mouse said they did doesn't mean it is formalised. I think you policy, it's just trying to calm down the far left base. First want to show you the arguments from trumps lawyers what's interesting here, is that shortly after Bloomberg ran the story. Trump lawyers ask if Pelosi delay She isn't impeached, yet no offense, published his up in Bloomberg as Well Limburg reports, lawyers close to present. Proper exploring whether house.

We Nancy policies decision to temporarily withhold articles of impeachment from the Senate could mean the press. Hasn't actually been impeached. The case is, rhetorical one falling Wendy, Wednesday nights votes to impeach the president to articles, the: U S. Constitution grants the House of Representatives full authority over impeachment, but the It is part of an effort by the White House and Senate Republicans to maximize their leverage as lawmakers debate when and how to conduct a try, on charges the president abused its power to solicit an investigation into politics rival Joe Biden and obstructed the convention investigation into the matter. Now I want to up here and comment on this thing. They said: that's an order, and by the White House to maximize their leverage. I don't think that's they are considering Noah Feldman called for the import into the president and his actually upholding that same argument, saying no tromp hasn't been impeached shares. What do let's break down what Noah Feldman said, but I think there's one extremely important point.

You need to hear before we read why tromp was not impeached. Yet this is a list of impeachment, not yet the United States around the world. We can see here, I believe, ok it's not in chronological order or maybe it as it is. They say Donald. Country, United States, abuse of power, obstruction of Congress. Impeached by the House of representatives awaiting trial. In the U S and it unfortunate Wikipedia. This is incorrect. Donald Trump legally was not impeached. This Britain How am I to do a sidestep right now and just say this, the problem of with Wikipedia, and why am I not as big a fat ass I used to be they just PETE whatever the media said that the media is wrong. According to a legal scholar who a up by anyone would be the one we would prefer to. Yes, when he says troops should be impeached and yes way says he wasn't impeached the same true for Turkey and the other, you know oppressors if you're, an academic and you're an x on the constitution and you say: Tromp was unimpeached. I defer to you over the journalist, if you think trumped should be,

impeach on these issues. I will still too far to you over the journalists, but they say trot. Impeach the important point here we go down. We can see Bill Clinton somewhere Nineteenth eighteen. Ninety eight for perjury an obstruction of justice to statutory crimes. We go down delicacy Andrew Johnson, eleven high crimes and misdemeanours, The fact of the matter is Richard next who resigned before impeachment? All of the other president to actually faced impeachment we're being charged with statutory crimes. Trump is the first president to face to face. No statutory climb abuse of power is a political act. An obstruction of Congress is also a political opinion. Jared Golden Democrat from main argued against the obstruction charge saying it was rushed politically and the house did not use their legal remedies to go after tromp for refusing to abide subpoenas, basically, the house needed.

I am sorry the Democrats needed to go or the house yes needed to go to the Supreme Court to get this cleared up and they did not do that. Therefore, you cannot argue obstruction of Congress, but the fact remains that this this is wrong. First Trump isn't impeached legally, if we want to say you know no Feldman is correct, but there's also no crimes here. No statutory crimes is the as president, in U S history, to face no statutory criminal charge impeachment, but let's you know four minutes to say, and I think I think it's fair. But even if you're on the left, if Europe, if you're being, Some fair, you will recognise. Noah Feldman is correct. He writes now the House of Representatives has has voted to impeach President Donald Trump. What is this? constitutional status of the two articles of impeachment must be transmitted and set it to trigger a trial, or could they be held back The house until the Senate decides what the trial will look like, I said Turn ass, he plus has hinted the constitution, doesn't say how fast the articles must go to the Senate

some modest delay is not inconsistent with the constitution or helpful. Chambers usually work, but an indefinite delay would pose. A serious problem, impeachment contemplating the constitution does not can just merely of the vote by the house. Process of sending the articles to the Senate for trial. Both its are necessary to make an impeachment. Under the constitution, the House must the house actually send the articles, and so managers to the Senate to prosecute the impeachment an assent. It must actually pull a trial. Think about that You could theoretically argue based on Feldman statement that if the house refused to hold a trial. Try wasn't impeached now, that's a step too far, but I think he makes a very fair point, as the export before him and nothing is the only export a much he's the only person we should listen to what he said. That they must have managers and the articles of Senate confirming their formalised the impeachment process, simple,

The voting on it doesn't mean anything and it gets a fair point. He says if the house does come you its impatient to the site. It hasn't actually impeached the president if the articles are not transmitted- tromp- could lodge they merely say that he wasn't truly impeached at all. This is I mean this huge for four tromp. Let's I think policies transmit the articles, I think it'll happen and there are some far left, I almost forgot, but the more progressive conspiracy theories as to watch going on and I'm gonna break them down for you, but suffice to say many people on the left think the supplant asked Bernie Sanders and not from an interest an idea that I want? I want to go after, but first, let's wrap up what's going on here. I think it's fair point. These looked at them let us are making about Bernie Sanders. But let's, let's read the What about why Trop wasn't really impeached? He says impeachment the constitution means the how sending its approved articles to the Senate with her Managers standing up in the Senate and saying the president is impeached.

For whatever reason, Nancy plus you saying she's, not she's, not going transmit this. Yet some people think it's because She just wants the symbolic victory, but they know they will lose innocent it and it could give trump leverage, but the more That's the idea they have is that they want her to withhold the articles until it can do major Bernie Sanders and other democratic candidates who must be jurors because their senators, I've got an art, pulled up, but less freedom. As the headlines we saw after the house about saying Trump impeached. Those are a media shorthand, not a technically correct legal statement. So far the house has voted to impeach Trump. He is an empty. Until the articles go to the Senate and the house, deliver. The message think about this way, both for there was television and video and whatever they could vote on it. Nobody would know simply because we watched on television doesn't mean it actually happened. Yet that's the most import part of the process it was created before transition?

I think it's fair to say you could. Our now that technology has developed, we use electrons, voting in the house. We all know they voted to impeach Trump colloquially. He was impeached based on. Legal standard of the constitution and what existed back then, just because the house votes Nobody knew they voted. Nobody would He was impeached until they go and confirm it with the Senate, Has it been each de now I do it's funny like another argument to show you about all these Liberals, cheering and dancing thinking. It literally means Trump is out of office, litter Nothing has happened yet, let's ride up, he says once the articles are sent? The Senate has institutional duty to hold a trial on the impeachment charges presented: failure for the Senate to or they trial after impeachment, would deviate from the constitution's clear expectations for the house to both to impeach without ever sending the articles of appealing to the Senate for trial would also deviate from the constitutional protocol. It would mean that the president had not yet

you only been impeached under the constitution and it would all oh, deny the president the chance to defend himself in the Senate that the constitution provides. So the process is incomplete. It didn't happen until Trump has a right to defend himself, because the impeachment process defines the prison try to defend himself. The relevant constitutional provisions are brief article, One gives the house the sole power of impeachment and it gives the Senate the sole power to try all impeachment article two says the President, shall be removed from office on impeachment for and conviction of treason, bribery or other high crimes and misdemeanours? Noting again, Trump has not been accused of any statutory crime, but the other presidents putting these three provisions together yields the conclusion that the only way to remove the president while he's in as it is in office, is, if the house, in peaches him and beside it, tries and conviction, The provision says nothing about timing taken literally, they do

directly say the articles of impeachment passed by the house must be sent to the Senate, but the framers definition of treatment assumed the impeachment was a process, not just a house vote framers drafted the constitution provisions against the backdrop of impeachment, as it had been practised in England, where the House of Commons impeached and the House of Lords tried the impeachment the whole point of impeach by the commons was for the charge impeachment to be brought against the accused in the House of lords. Strictly speaking, impeachment occurred and occurs when the articles of Treatment are presented to the Senate for trial, and at that point, this is obliged by the constitution to hold a trial. What would make that trial? Fair, separate question they deserve its own discussion. We can say with some confidence that only the Senate is empowered to judge the fairness of zone trial. That's what these soul power to try all impeachment means if the house votes to impeach, but doesn't send the articles to the Senate or send impeachment managers

to carry its message. It hasn't directly violate the text of the constitution, but the house would be acting against the implicit logic of the constitution's description of impeachment, a president Ingenuously impeached must constitutionally have the opportunity to defend himself before the Senate. That's built into the constitutional logic of impeachment, which demand they trial before removal. To be short. If the house just never sends the art its articles of impeachment to the Senate. There can be no I'll there. That's what these all power to impeach means if the house never sends the articles, then Trump could say strong justification that he has now actually been impeached, and that's probably not the congressional. Probably the message congressional Democrats are hoping descent night I don't like to redraft thing, but the context is extremely important. If I'm going to explain to you- and he wrote this down, let me reiterate: Noah Feldman was the Democrats, witness and he is now saying you didn't peace. The president got try to those articles

It's no surprise! Then we see this Mitch Mcconnell to policy. You can keep your because of impeachment in care. He sang fine, don't don't get sent him forward. Trumps team is arguing. He hasn't been it reached at all so much what Connell's going back and say by all means, send him our Amazon, am, I send dot com reports was the actual NBC is as NBC on its the examiner. I'm sorry that Washington examiner ok, they say majority leader, much Mcconnell said Thursday. He wouldn't negotiate the terms that trial without Speaker Nancy Blowsy, whose threatening to withhold the articles of impeachment. He said It's beyond me how the speaker and democratic leader in the Senate think with holding the article seven. Judgment and not sending them over gives them leverage. Frankly, I'm not anxious to have the trial. What there you go the next thing, so this business from closing The next thing for us will be and we see the process that is set forth in the Senate. Then we'll the number of monitors that we may have to go forward. Policy must appoint

democratic lawmakers to serve as managers to prosecute the case in the Senate. So up until that point he has not been impeached. The argument then arises. Why is Nancy Pelosi with holding the articles in the first place? Well, she sang she wants a fair trial in the Senate. Mitch Mcconnell is already said, he's gonna, walk and locks up with the president. Personally, I dont like that idea, which kind of to be fair, impartial and you don't need to act like you're gonna, be working with one s. Legal team to be fair and impartial and to recognise top should not be impeach for these things, if it, if you are opinion top has done nothing wrong don't need to say you're working with the president doing so that was a mistake. However, they did they preach the president and that's it matters so I wondered why Nancy Policy then voted on this and why she's really withholding these these these articles, as before a cause. It's their last, ditch effort. They know. They're gonna lose the majority in twenty twenty it maybe symbolic victory. The recently

transmit. The articles is because she doesn't want to lose the power once the Senate takes the reins. So now they want, they ve got near impeachment. Everyone cheers take a look at a story from the pluralist from pluralism. The from pluralist liberal on Twitter. Think impeachment means Trump is getting kicked out of office idiot swell This opinion is very clear there, but, yes, they do shit many people on twitter and you can just go. Look it up here, cheering and posting dancing videos and say the president has been removed. The same trump has been impeached and kicked out of the White House. There posing think saying Bob I, when first of all, sadly for these people hasn't actual impeached. Yet that's what's so funny about it. I think troll we appeased right. I think they voted for it. I think they'll get on with it. But let me do this while all of these people are cheering and dancing thinking Trump, isn't the present anymore. When he is this, will We go back and just make sure I'm at this point clear,

the Democrats and policy were worried that the base was celebrating and demanding impeachment. These model Democrats knew that if they didn't vote to impeach drop, there would be prime married and they would not get reelected Jeff Andrew switch republican Party. Here we can see what I think we can see what actually happened you see Pelosi knows she knows that people dont know impeachment means and she knows that they can actually not impeach presents along as they claim they did. So they voted for the left fears and they never actually formalize the impeachment, but now bases, wild up and happy thinking they ve won and pollution. Actually says both sides. A spring and their step. Perhaps that was the real point, but there are many things Bernie Sanders fans, particularly with another, can spirits. He theory see. Everybody knows, Donald Trump isn't going to lose this fight and dramatically helped. The president. This was, entertaining idea, I dont like play the conspiracy game, but let me

retain what people are saying on the left and I don't mean like establishment up? I mean the Bernie supporters, you see when you think about impeachment, and you see my complaints. Unlike everything, the Democrats have done with impeachment. Help Donald Trump. His approval rating is up he's waiting in the polls, new polish from CNN, showing Trop now basically beats everybody fundraising tens of millions of dollars. Why would they do this now when Trump is gonna win. Well, here's the theory is to take down Bernie Sanders two makes he cannot campaign to make other Senate Democrats, they don't like also kept compact campaign, but guess which two candidates can Joe Biden and PETE Buddha judge as right. They have no Senate obligations for the impeachment trial, Nancy Policy with, all the articles waits till after Christmas once we are getting into like full swing. Election seas with Super Tuesday come up then she transmits them. And the Senate trial begins and guess who

That's removed from the campaign trail Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth, worn guess who doesn't boat a judge and bite also Yang right check so this is stored from time. They say if the house from October mind you, if the house votes to impeach Trump thereof, catalyzing a trial in the sun? It? It will mark a profound politic. Historical moment, but it also usher in an extraordinary logistical challenge for the six sitting: democratic senators duking it out for their parties, presidential nomination in twenty twenty. They may you'd be required in Washington during the peak of the early primary campaign? I'm sorry, that's gonna knock out a lot of very him. You know top to your candidates and it's gonna pave the path for Joe Biden and for people to judge the established favorites people to judge is- it has always been the establishment favorite, but certainly rising in the ranks- he's corps Billionaire donors and Bernie Sanders call them off with it. Now I've been very critical of burning and it's worse, pandering but I've all

so given on respect for saying it like. It is like at that. One of the previous debates, Elizabeth refused to say they would raise your taxes and then Bernie stop at work. Raise your taxes and, unlike Give her being honest. If people disagree, another vote against you. I respect that. I think burns play the game a bit too much binding. It's fair to point out that, as of now I'm while the left is being smeared by the press and there and and the Dnc has been cheating for a long time, but I'm hoping that these people, sieves, anti establishment and populous left start realising you gotta admit it. Tromp was right about Chrome is the Dnc and Trump is right about the media. Junk you give the Turkey is running for Congress and they're pulling out all the stops to smear him in completely unfair ways. Now, look I've criticise, you know Genk and he yelled at me, but I Think it's fair, fair vertical, not for what is actually done wrong, not to lie about it. Actually, and they do the same thing to burning and they do the same- two young, but what would happen Joe Biden Joe bite

can do no wrong Joe Biden, Ukraine, no wrong and sure enough. Now, if policy with hope, these articles, until this, until we get into Super Tuesday season, she's, going to negatively impact these other Democrats and they don't like burn and then one stop and salt. Are you this right now on that saying the really there. Ok, that's what's your letter, saying in my personal, and yet I think it makes more sense is that the Democrats are just aimless out of control and have no idea what they're doing, but we had a new pull here excess from CNN Trump, is tied with bite him. He beats worn by two points: sanders by four Buddha judged by five yeoman impeachment has been just everything. Tromp needs. I got one more thing to end without its official tromp, announces former Democrat Jeff Andrew, is join the party with the hands and I believe in the oval office who say this done Tromp, announced Rep Andrew would be joining would be joining the Democratic Party. No you

republican Party as the former democratically. Men stood alongside the president in the oval office. You guys got a big old legal error right there, but Tom. I watch the video you can see it then its around, but more importantly, Jeff Andrews if the endorsement of Donald Trump- and I believe it coffee, I think also maybe pants their endorsing him there. And back behind him, and I think they're gonna put their full weight to make. In short, Jeff Andrew gets reelected to prove a point. That those a loyal to the president will risk give their support and will be the tool. Yes, but will see what happens in the end what really matters is: ok, listen but Tom. You this video, maybe Nancy Policy, transmit the articles I dont know so far, though I don't asks son in this, video tromp has not been in peace Yet you can't just say we all agree to impeach the present and then do nothing. You actually have to caen the process by sending the managers who are prepared to prosecute the impeachment, and only with one more point, I say:

as I stated not twice, you need recognize that tromp as the first president to be to be well almost peaches devoted the process, but the acute No statutory crime- that's important. I could be wrong, but I saw my understanding of what we seen so far just wrong. There's two grand next month's coming up at six p m youtube com slashed him cast news. It is it s different channel and I will see you all there. J K rolling came out in support, a woman who was fired for her tweets about Trans gender women, Harry Potter? author is facing intense criticism for backing. My afforestation who opposes the, Kay government's proposal to allow people to change their legal gender. The case has driven ash. I stand with Maya. You may have seen the stories I covered yesterday, but we have some interesting developments and it's kind of made me particularly frustrated. I have some bad news for people. Science is a thing,

You can't just say something is anti science without actually having academia to back it up. Now you have a bunch of active citizenship organizations condemning J K rolling because she said something that is currently backed by science. Now I got a warning signs changes. Okay, we can be wrong about things and we made learned and reassess and change how you, the world the fact remains until that happens, you are being anti science when you accuse J K rolling of being it s, that's, ok! Ok! I got slowdown lotta viewpoint. Like wait, wait what what's happening at first J K rolling. She writes Harry Potter. We all know that for some reason she can't seem to just stop like us. The past few movies that Brenda what things like. I said yesterday that not could not good don't like yeah You know, and so I shall have a funny tweet for you and I to show you it's from the sky Nathan Grayson, who is a reporter Qatar go now I can imagine that him being somewhat too could talk. We probably have political disagreements, but I think

I have to say I completely. I agree with them right here when he says J K Rolling will forever be remembered as a person who could have shut the F up after two thousand seven, but for some reason, did not ok This is an update to a story, so I dont want to waste too much time telling you everything, but basically there's a woman named Maya Force, data, she her contract expired. Sheep, cheap and wouldn't renew her contract. She apparent at a hearing, because the reason they wouldn't renew it because she's made controversial statements. I actually, I don't think, a controversial all, but I guess everything is controversial, because everything is anti signs and everyone's incitement anyway, They wouldn't renew her position and she's at using eggs couple of something that made it so that she couldn't work there anymore. She said I am perfectly happy to use preferred programme and accept everyone's humidity and right to free expression, transmit our trans him and that's great, but enforcing the Mother tradesmen are women is totalitarian. Ok, here's another!

It is true that this is a strange case. When woman, when and then where flats, trousers and no make up, they don't become men. I said no indeed, and when, and when men, where make appeals dresses, they dont become women. The norm seems to be that we should pretend they do to avoid hurt feelings. These are the tweet that dotterine trouble and well then, in her not getting so if she wasn't fired her contract is being renewed. That's what's happening. She also tweeted that she doesn't see the difference. Tween a man claiming to be a woman and Rachel. Oh, that's all pretending to be black J K, rolling tweeted in defence of her, saying something like actually do? They have the tweet from Jake Irrelevant. I have another article I will show you she said dress. However, Please call yourself whatever you like sleep with any consenting adults who will have you leave your best life in peace insecurity but force women. Their jobs for stating that sexes real. I stand with my hashtag. This is not a drill. Here's the

we are now seeing tweets from some celebrities. That prove to me social media credit occult these people are salute the insane and you know what market you are not being spared, you know, what more can we, your voice, This is impeccable. You are the best joker of all jokers, in my opinion, an end with the enemy series, but but you know the veto against too is Israel. Her voice. It's the joke. I've been a growth at that became much respect and you're Luke Skywalker Argovie. I can separate them from the artist and absolutely commend you on being a tremendously great encounters. When it comes to politics, I'm sorry, I try avoid doing things like this, but I have to say it mark. You are being a spineless coward. Ok I'm not saying that, because I'm trying to hurt your feelings or just give you make an emotional dig. I'm saying that in the truest sense of what those facts mean, let me explain he liked the tweet from J Robin. I can respect that fine when a cat respect is this a woman on Twitter,

Why did you like this treads tweet, more camels, Botz ignorance is no excuse, but I liked the tweet without understanding what the last line or hashtags meant it was the first four lines I liked and didn't realize it any transfer connotation mark you just told us that, when you like tweets, when you interact with these things, You don't understand, I'm ok, I'll, be fair. Maybe it's the way Time mark didn't really understand what he was liking. Or maybe mark, doesn't really understand what is lacking at all and what is apologizing for he just said he didn't we are there any transfer of accreditation, and then that means to me he still does. I understand why does he's just saying up somewhere Some person on the internet got mad, better change political opinions. Bravo, I'm sorry! You have no spine. And it's not just more Campbell, Patricia our cat apparently said I do not stand with Maya for many reasons. Ok, you know what listen there's a differ

between protecting someone's feelings, respecting their humanity make. I'm sure that in our society will remain safe and have access to programs in healthcare, and all of that is important and must be accomplished as a difference between that and saying that females also are warning the same protections. Ok, that there is a distinction between transmit a biological female for whatever reason they don't want to. Do that I'll tell you what let me show you a few things, and you know we're going play this game this- why I First social media is is cutting occult and the evidence is that more camel has no idea. What is apologizing for because he doesn't even understand what's wrong with a tweet in the first place, basically he's bending the need to a random account. Could you imagine if, like there was oppressed and of a country, and he said we

in the past this law to reform this. You know criminal justice thing and then a random cartoon character on internet said. Are you? Are you you're, a big it? Oh wow, I am about to change a better backtrack on all this. What are we doing? you don't even know what happened. You even know what it was: transphobia you're, a better apologize. What if what? If someone else, we like you, know what- quickly, no matter what Mark Hamel likes now, just call transfer that go back out and realize I just I don't know. Because he does. He still doesn't know. That's what makes that makes it a cult. They have now no idea what they're doing wrong they're. Just scared of the outrage mobs of his age. If you tell me what to believe and all believe it, sorry, that's not listen. I like glad ok they treated but about, but I have to say you have a lot of organisations that I feel like our betraying civil rights for the sake of some kind of political brownie point based on weird cartoon avatars on twitter, complaining, overtime, Glad tweeted bans. People at has aligned herself with time

anti science ideology that denies the basic humanity of people who are transgender trans and non binary. People are not a threat to women and she didn't say that. Did she and to imply otherwise puts trans people at risk. Now is the time for feminists, whom no one support transit to speak up and support Trans people's rights to be treated equally and fairly. Well mixed up. First, in no way d, J, K, rolling, say that Trans border threat to women in no way fact. The original woman, my off, we're state or said absolutely respects the humanity and precise transit and Maya state or has a tweet where she said the issue is that being fee? male is immutable. It is a characteristic. It is protected class and if remove that distinction. You are getting rid of that protect class and that's what I've set, How can you expand the protection of civil rights by literally passing a law to take away civil rights protections from biological females? the crazy world we live in. We need, as I stated yesterday, why did

I think, was on this video. So this is But, as I said yesterday, If we really want to protect the civil rights of everybody, we do understand the distinction between the groups saying trans, women or women actually, Sir, to undermine both groups, indifferent ways? Nobody? actually say, trans people are protected for a variety of reasons. Women are protected for a variety of reasons and made a distinction, but because people want to just I, in their minds, literally, be something that at least based on today's technology. They can't be. We are under running, actual civil rights? That to me is not now. First of all my afforestation, then it means that they didn't opera up. Contract will that's too bad right. So you know to correct the last video the up Now I understand it, it's then saying your contract expired, have a nice day. Ok, you're done if somebody who want to we hire you well to bed, then it fire, because if it is going to resign or contract fine, I don't he's gonna dumb, but let's lets us to the nitty gritty in the science. The eight hour, human rights campaigner believe or not I've. Actually,

Used as if as a fundraiser, I used to canvass for the human rights, can and I have raised a lot of money for them. It was all a few weekends right, cried events and stuff and have a lot of respect for what they I guess used to do, Did you know that the eight hour see- and this is this- is just my understanding, is like thirteen years ago. They supported a bill that didn't provide protect for Trans people because they thought it was. It was more expedient. This at least what I heard from internal people working for these organizations and so there's a big a clash between a lot of other algae BT rights organisations and agency was leaving tranquil behind. So they don't have a perfect record on this, but you know what if they are now coming out and doing right by the Trans Community and therefore had to her that I can respect them now, getting on board with what they feel is. Principled, accept, let's look of a tweet trans women or women trans Norman, Non binary, people are non binary, Cecy, J K, rolling, ok, ok, first of all non by people on our non binary. Yes, that's literal, I agree

that's like saying a tree is a tree while right you called it a tree in the first place, that's transmit our men in a search The kind of social context that exists only for a small group of activists transmit our women. Also the the same thing, and I we know immediately. Is you know whenever sets up like this? It's like the left is gonna freaked out, but I have to tell you something: it's not my opinion I am not saying these things to be hurtful. I'm saying that currently based on here knowledge and the structure of the english language. What they said is just fundamentally false. If Google, the word woman. They tell you a woman is an adult human female and now we're going to the point where definitions literally, don't make sense. Ok and I told him if he will do, the definition of man is an adult human male. However, I would like to point something out: interestedly trans men are in fact man is defined, is that this is an you cannot argue. This fact know why, because men

is all a man, and men are also defined as humanity, in which case there really make sense. Now. I think that the issue is how they're kind of framing it that's not what they're saying, but that's actually actually, make sense. Semantically man, can be used as a reference any human being of any gender. Perhaps there is some kind of like sexist patriarchal thing. You noted to complain about their. Don't ask me the point of bringing up, I'm just noting that if you really want to get into the nitty gritty of like weather, makes sense. Yet the problem is trans. Women are women, becomes I mean both at what the agency is trying to explain, becomes complicated right. Here's though it could be the page for one. I have shown this many a time. It says a woman, is a female human being the word woman is usually reserved for an adult girl is usually the term for a female chowder adolescent. The plural women is also sometimes used for female humans, regardless of age as it phrases and phrases such as. These rights typically or ministry

Ex chromosomes and is capable of pregnancy and giving birth from puberty until menopause female Annette. As distinguished from male anatomy, includes the Philippines tubes, ovaries, Yunus, uterus, vulva, etc, etc. Are yet point here's what happens a lot? trans activists or weird lefty, I know people it's what we met on the internet say things like soap, so actually matters in the in the red it threats for this story. People are saying, wait a minute. There is a social construct, but sex isn't immutable inimitable characteristic and then you see the same argument from any of his activists. Thing did you ever ask someone if they have a uterus before referring to them as she and their argument, but that doesn't change the fact that there is. There is not one thing makes some one male or female. Are this is the argued they try and use to argue transmit are women. But they're using social constructs soda, go to my a forced, forced NATO's point when she said

simply by our or echoes. In other words, if a man dresses of if a woman where's trousers, she does become a man and if a man was a dress, he doesn't come on in exactly this rates. A conundrum in what they're trying to explain with changing definitions, but let it let me upon this and come back to the social contract argument versus for transferring it sets a woman is a female human being. Ok, let's see what feeling means, however, it also says some women, our trans. That literally makes no sense. If you want it to be true, that's fine! It's it's not an argument, but opinions or ideology. I'm literally telling you you can't say multinationals say. At the same time, a woman is female human being, and some women are trends. The someone trans would then actually mean that someone, and our trans men. Ok, if there's woman means female and some female our Trans Trans people more female, introducing two male, our trans men

none of this makes sense right. Therein lies the big problem with interesting about Wikipedia. Is that because people articles based on their perception in their ideology there is, there is a SEC four transgender ism, which is completely at odds with the rest of Wikipedia science section. And I know I was before- but it all by european female is the sex of an organism or part of an organism that produces non mobile over eggs, barring rare medical conditions, most female mammals, including female humans, have two x chromosomes regional characteristics vary between different species, with some species containing more well defined female characteristics such as the presence of pronounced memory glands. There is no single genetic mechanism behind sex differences in different species and the existence of sexist, seems to have evolved multiple times independently in fishing lineages, the term female comes the Latin America, the dominion. A form of fat, Femmina, meaning woman. It is not

Emma logically related to the word. Male. That's really interesting to so. Let's eat us. They try to say that. Oh you up something. Jose Female or people who have babies, and then the latter we'll be alike. So well then has a hysterectomy she's, no longer female gacek? No! Ok! It is. Is it is a collection of general understandings and general characteristics to both groups. Typically related to the two dominant in a by model in a by model system, sexes, they say barring rare medical conditions. Most female mammals have two x chromosomes. What's missing, the whole argument. Is that will actually it's not missing it's just. What we're thinking up happening is your people, might try to give a simplified general understanding without being able to attack the new ones, and the left him at exploits that by saying so if a woman can have kids anymore after menopause, she's no longer went, that's not true, so let's throughout this up and on and on out of talking about the big problems that we're having from the left and why it's it's

not conducive to actually helping civil rights. First, as I said in my time, I think we need to make sure that trans people are protected. They can have rights, jobs that they're not to discriminate against. All of you protectionism to exist. If we want to make sure this but actions exist, we to make sure we can legally, we can formally the distinction as to what is being protected. Herein lies the big problem You claim gender is a social construct then, anybody wearing that. Then, how do you define what a woman really is? What makes a dress a woman if a person, puts on addressing a wig. They done. Become moment or they do if they say they are at what point. But more importantly, if a woman can wear it like it is, if an actual woman can wear a suit, a free pc, then if a man is wearing, if we pursue, can he saves a woman rights of the You becomes if your claiming there is nothing like Their simultaneously arguing that, if a female human being could wear mail. You know today

no gender role, clothes and still be female- that she should not anyway ashamed if she wants to where certain cloves and use and you ve seen many males are special. We on the left, who aware dresses and still defies mail, and they are doing to break gender roles. Ok, that I get What point does it become? A woman it simply because he says I am here, I'm not in which case the closer completely irrelevant. If you remove, all of the social contract. From the picture you basically have to. Individuals who can simply say they are or they aren't. How do we tat someone civil rights. If we can't even define what that person is. Therein lies the problem with trying to do this there way. If the activists, I'm trying to assert some kind of moral victory on the definition of a word. We could actually fine in legal terms. What a transgender person it's a person assigned at birth, one tax who, then you know use it. You know

I won't therapy. Are there are other issues to transition to another? You know too, to the other. You know sex or whatever it's complicated, because hormone therapy really doesn't change or sex in the first place. So what really need happened as a conversation around what sex is versus gender and how that, actually mergers or how they they they interact with each other. As I just stated, the main point, is that of gender as a socialist social construct, and there are infinite, genders Then literally, you know any any of these people. I could call the male or female, simply based on my own personal opinion of them right that here's you ve, Trans, on another woman, I can say they're both men other both women, or neither our men or other women, because there's no way to determine whether or not they are or aren't based on what they look like, because the activists themselves are stated. Gender is social construct solely for this to the agency. I need to ask you a question can you define the word woman and I I ask this in. Please sincerity, can you can you define that word recently?

we saw a video, an accurate, and maybe it may have been all our. Nobody was Joe Swenson of UK of a liberal Democrats. She was asked on a call to define the word woman and she could not her spots was, I think we all know what it is. I'm sorry, I don't ok, I don't I really. Mean I dont, because Wikipedia tells me it's an adult. Women female Webster's dictionary, adult human female. That's it So if someone is biologically mail and takes hormones day, they are not an adult human female there's, still mail, but they're taking hormones so there answer me two different back right. If you're saying they are women, but I need you to give me a legitimate definitions like an understand what your argument is. I would like to agree with you, I would like to agree with everybody. Ok, while that not everybody the point of making us, we want come to terms and understand each other and figure out how we can live together in agreement right. That means I need you to do fine what this means so that I can agree with, because right now, basically, I've, no

why deal you're trying to say I really really don't look at an end, and I mean that in all Since I have no idea what that means is just like Ike literally can understand what that is, because the deafened do not fit that and if an so far. I have not seen a single definition of what woman or man is from these groups other than saying transmit our women. Okay, if woman isn't about a collection of characteristics related to do you know your bylaws a structure which is basically what it has done him female. And its social construct. Then someone could work plant on their head and say it's part of being a woman. Like you know a man I'm again trouble. I want to wrap it up. There The main point I want to make with this. Is that so Libraries are insane, that's really it they just, They would have you know what gross spine. I you know, I wrap it up with this more camel. Do you really care that much man, that's pathetic? It really is,

some things are based in science and science can change, and if that actually happens and the definite This change and a new academic research comes out definitively stating we think it's do X, Y and I'm right here. I love it. Science works because We recognise that things in the past worked correct and we improve upon them and I'm totally What did that in any form the agenda tax trance. Anything so for not done that it just a bunch of ideological activists and celebrities virtue, signalling so calm down. Do the research change the actual science present, your thesis get your phd. Do the work, then come to all standard academic literature and change. It I'll tell you this if it turns out, because I guess I've read much of this academic literature, so there there I've, the arguments I am just saying right now. We are not in that place, so for you to say all of these things, sorry, ok, we're not there!

and you're gonna define these words for me. Otherwise, I have no idea what you're talking about a live there sickroom next, it's coming up at one p m on this channel, and I will see you all then following the major victory of the conservatives in the UK and the massive defeat of the Labour Party breaks, it has final the one I think, I mean they voted for it, but come on man, even with the majority of skeptical, we'll see it's been years, but we do have big breaking news. Uk parliament backs breaks it deal, in decisive step toward leaving the EU on January thirty. First, the decision, a significant breakthrough for Prime Minister Bourse Johnson, who swept to electoral victory last week on a pledge to get breaks it done historical, NBC News, but I've. Another story which makes me look. I'm worried Even what this majority something bad might happen, but I'll tell you what it keeps happening, until convinced it won't happen again, but- you just say. As somebody who is not british and dutch,

know exactly how the people whose country feel there is an overlap between the bricks voter trump voter, though working class individuals who want to have their voice heard, who are tired of being smeared and called racists and all of those things some of those people may be bad people. But to overwhelmingly generalised all of these people results in an overwhelming defeat for your party. This is now, as I understand it, the second definitive vote. Saint get breaks it done. We all see it lets me the news, but then I want to reign on your parade because I think there's rocky waters ahead, but but I must admit, I thought, We are seeing that the home stretch. This is, this is the final stretch, their coming to finish, I think they're gonna get it. I'm casinos report the british law makers on Friday finally voted to back a plan to withdraw from European Union Prime Minister Bore Johnson's bill, backed by a huge parliamentary majority, we'll take the country out of the twenty eight may a block on January thirty, first and laid the groundwork for sweeping foreign and

policy shifts the three hundred fifty eight two hundred and thirty four about marks, a significant breakthrough for Johnson who stormed to electoral victory last week on a pledge to get breath done the former mayor of London when the large conservative majority said Margaret Thatcher in nineteen eighty seven conforming His position, as prime minister after he took over from Teresa may in July? You that's really crazy about what happened. The UK look, I know a pot. I should say Altaforte Sargon are if you got difficult what sounds kind of disease from there? He knows better than me, but my standing as that there were districts that world were liberal, like leftist for, like a hundred years, that voted Conservative because of how messed up everything is and I'll tell you this breaks. It may have been the linchpin to get breaks at dawn was the big push and people were finally sick of the processing. Just do it not say this, you didn't just give Boris Johns

a path towards breaks it you get the conservative party, a majority for other conservative policies and now they're, apparently putting forward economic plans, and so far it looks like that. The markets and an end well, the british pound. You a dollar, it's actually doing really well, let's keep reading and basically supports, Johnson's majority of eighty seats in the House of Commons meant he was able to pay, the withdrawal agreement built legislation that implement the divorce deal hammered out with the European Union. Britain joined The EU that the European Economic Community, a precursor to the you and nineteen. Seventy three, his predecessor may failed on three occasions to win support for a deal. She had a great with the EU You didn't hurt to resign earlier this year in October, four Johnson was forced to break his own, do or die deadline to lead Britain out of the block after lawmakers, rejected his proposed timetable. To get the withdrawal agreement bill through parliament, meaning he had. He had to request a bricks. Extension from european leader

now here's, where things is worth things give mark. Ok, first, you So what they just said. Johnson was we're gonna do or die. It's gonna happen. Other lawmakers rejected its timetable, got pushed back. He was forced to go and ask for an extension in because of that idea was. He was then going to call for a general election which they one now meeting many of these people who blocked that breaks. It may be gone and again at the front people need tape. I know better but is already up ads popping up and this could just be the remnants of the resistance trying to stop Rex. It saying that there I can go to get this trade deal done and can be really really bad and I'm gonna be beholden to the? U S, but I gotta say as an American. I think I think the cousin cross, the part as an American Rose and men and women will do right by the UK the they want to trade deal with us. I think I think that makes sense right round the bill

dubbed W b by bricks. Watchers commits Britain to leave the European Union on January thirty first and to conclude trade talks with the blocked by the end of twenty twenty five all stages of ratification will take place. After Christmas, however, they should not be confused with the and of bricks it as we are only nearing the end of stage one- and this is where I want everyone- listen I'm not telling you like, I think, there's a pitfalls, two bucks, it I'm not british! I don't know I'm just saying if the people- so they want it. You probably should just do it. Ok for for better or for worse. My position has always been you can rag on tromp all day and night, but I tell you this: the guy one but wanted him to win and they get to live with his decisions, good or bad breaks. It is the same thing, but I'll tell you this now, it's the end of stage one somewhere around in your. Right I guess print. I guess if you're someone was really really into brakes. If you happen to live there or you're, an American who wants to get done, I'm tellin you, man, there's a lot of time and I think what I said. What we see brought bourse Johnson, doing get out of the EU by the thirty first and then

start. Negotiating trade was the smart move, because, if they tried to play like they would get a trade agreement before leaving it would never never happen and that's the complaint up open a second as much of the acts of rex it since Britain voted to leave. The European Union enjoys. Sixteen has centred on the divorce itself. With that indoors, by Parliament Friday. The UK must now pay two negotiating what breaks it will actually look like for citizens businesses alike, first United, that will enter a transition period that lasts until December twenty twenty in which it will continue to like a member of the European Union. In the meantime, top of the agenda is the finding the nature of Britain's future relationship with the European Union Post divorce and there it is nothing gonna change for a year. I'll. Tell you this man. How much do you that and I'm warning you, you might think, I'm crazy, but which it general election, I dont. Look, I'm not illegal I'm not a british citizen, but I'm worried

there will be another flap, there will be another. You know something bad will happen, someone like look, they voted for Rex it over three years ago and they can get it done. It's been a back and forth uptown. Right. If you, if you rest on our laurels now as budget support or if you like, we didn't Johnson's and we're not gonna go home now you're gonna Euro is there are taken away from you. I do not believe this even I'd be seen as saying: don't confuses variant of it, because much is their say will be up with thirty first they're going to act like a member until twenty twenty. What happened today yet negotiated trade deal. What happens and if you see a mounting effort by the Labour Party, they get rid of carbon, whose unpopular and deeply anti semitic apparently and they find someone who's more modern and more popular who wants to remain and then start playing games. I just know believe it. I really don't. I think you know you Norman, I listen to a speech by Nigel for eyes, and I was really impressed. Did you now. If the UK, as a house of lords, I didn't understand I thought it was like the house in the Senate know it too.

The House of Lords, like appointees, of like land owners from historic time, maybe I'm wrong, but my general understanding- and I was talking to- I think it likes argon and angular, and they were like give Europe so Nigel Fridays are abolished, the House of lords and I'm like? How have you not well being Bye the money. Like literally it's like we're, noble, sir we're in charge. Now on play that of an American and America. You could be from the gutter, you could be a bar tender from New York and become a Congress person. Yes, I respect they receive for making that we so America's all about. I can criticise for being ignorant now, even all that, but I love the fact that in America you can be a bartender, you can be a working class and say uncommon in I'm. Taking, you guys down and no we're not gonna be subjected to historical money and lords. I must admit, though, the system all that direction, the matter what we do anyway right Senators are all super wealthy. You know we have legacy politicians I get it, but at least at least it's not built that way.

And we have some safeguards, you know you can see, people come from modest means, the american dreams, a real thing, Sir Nigel Fries. Also I've got a constitution and I think that's what the biggest problems, I've seen as somebody who doesn't know a whole lot of how the UK works. I am generally confused when they're like. Oh, it's a new government. Over switching now we have a general election. Unlike the. U S, more rigid than that. You know we know what our elections are. Gonna, be. We know what our rights are in and in the end there essentially immutable. I mean that's I say, essentially because really really hard to get rid of a constitutional right. You know we We we ve, we have amended and got rid of some things like prohibition was was, was taken away. I think that was that, when the constitution, right anyway, our government is based on founding document. You can ever so and is a lot of countries that don't let's wait a little bit more than I'll, bring it to the to the to the worrying news. They say: bye Does the council Levin wants to strike a trade deals, ambitious. Johnson, has insisted that he won't agree to any more delays. Pledge has that of alarm bells among businesses who fear Britain could crash

the European Union, with no future trade around in place of big enough? Twenty? Twenty one and audio break It is widely considered a nightmare scenario raising deposit only a short of food and medicine, civil unrest and conflict. In Northern Ireland, but I tell you this. I think Trump wants a symbolic victory so you may have heard about Jeff Andrew for those that are Eric and who are watching he's a Democrat. Who is now hoping to become Republican, it's a huge risk, but I think the Republicans are gonna protect him. You know why they want the symbolic victory of proving they ve defeated the less If, if Jeff Andrew is voted out only make Republicans look weak or or disloyal, so I think trumps going behind Andrew Are you going to say he was a smart man is a moderate and we respect his voice, even though we disagree and Republicans owing to support that to prove my point not only that a lot of republicans are probably moderate to disagree with them. John certain issues, but here's the point. Donald Trump has

reason to strike a trade deal with the UK before the end of twenty twenty, even as soon as possible, and I ve been told about it. Apparently there some fake news about the? U S like interfering with their national health service or whatever. Apparently, that's fake news insight began to something. I have no idea. The points think about symbolic victory of trumped If you know, nationalism and fair trade agreements know cry, and the. U S embassy eight, which even there he Pelosi says was Fantastic Donald Trump and steps up its borders. More Johnson says: don't worry about it. We got your back, you ve, got to leave the EU and will make sure that vote stands Donald Trump Populist Right Rex, it a populist, rightly movement, Bourse Johnson, is the same thing. Babylon B, a typical website ran a joke. Article sang labour. You know labour voters shocked, or you know cry our scream after after seeing Boris Johnson pull off mask to revealing, actually Donald Trump. The point is: if Trump wants to make an example of the defeat of these left,

policies and positions. He needs to make sure that UK doesn't face food shortages, civil unrest, etc. The UK, is going to face civil unrest, no matter what, as will the Eu S, but I think it's a big opportunity. We're trapped to say, if you want to take care of yourself, we got your back, but it's your country, you want Leave the EU. Congratulations to you did it. Your people voted Soviet, now wondering Trade Deal with you guys trouble payment another major victory on a fair trade deal. That's good for both countries make sure that you can doesn't collapse. An inch Stanley creates the strange, historical inversion where the colonies were. Once under the jurisdiction of the crown, and now the crown and is seeking assistance, a trade, the automated states, so it created critical. Billy Balancing factor now I get a lot of people will say the U S came in safety K a hundred years ago. You know with world WAR two and stuff nine. I know it's funny, but like we used to be,

under the crown- and now it's the crown coming to the: U S and ass being like we got your back, and so it's funny stuff. But let me you're a little bit more. I wanna make sure with this historic vote. For Rex it you make sure you stay vigilant, diligent Another Brooks crisis next year is almost guaranteed from the irish times. Trade experts are you Thus there is no time for a major. Eu Trade Deal before December, and that's why I talked about prompt and his symbolic victory and why he would want to have a trade deal with the UK to prove a point to claim these women and that really rally his base. People in the UK will be really rally by that look: a lot of bricks of voters. They liked Trump too, but if you think the Labour Party and the left are going to back down in the face of wrecks it you're sorely mistaken Donald Trump One, the presidency have dealt with nothing but years of psychosis. Ok, they refer who is to accept it. They hate the man so much. They tried to impeach em in effect,

didn't actually mean peach em I'll, get to that the next time and at four p m. But I tell you this: this is the budding crisis that you will start hearing about moving forward to make sure bricks? It does not happen. Trade exe It's our unanimous. There will not be a time for me your Eu Trade deal you're gonna get all these people working class people too concerned is, is the economy in a tank? I wouldn't have short food water medicine. What's gonna happen, we really need that trade deal and then, when they start, you know hammering Oda economies, gonna crash and the recession line, there's gotta the massive outrage that this is the we all this the seed being planted to major works. It does it before it's the last, effort of the left or their mounting resistance. It over will never be over the ends. Don't justify means because you will never meet the UN's, perhaps bricks it will actually happen January thirty. But, as you saw they're going to act like members, if you'd you until Twont until somber, twenty twenty, so basically another year. That's a lie on time for people to try it

do something rather understand they'll be a formal. You know they will formally if the EU and a thirty first, I guess, if you like rescue but across your fingers, because they ve been somebody blocks and delays. Who knows what will happen? Not say this? I would be out my my bet. My prediction for what's gonna happen with the UK, is trumpets gonna to swoop in with a very very UK favouring trade deal. I think they'll there'll be a trade deal that will fully favour the UK. Absolutely I dont think it will be bad for the: U S, I think it will be slightly better for the UK. The reason, like I stated they The symbolic victory they need make sure the UK proves that their populist movement works so I'll, try as a trade deal with that hurts the UK and they struggle that proves it doesnt work, and it proves that in this direction, is bad across the board. Lee in the EU and not getting a trade deal with the EU. If that's true will be bad for for many people in the UK, Ireland and its further point out too, however,.

You can think of the trade arrangements, is kind of an addiction. You know your game, all these others, food and medicine stuff from you, so you become less self reliant. You start working with trade partners wait. Tromp has worked, things has brought jobs back, I mean try bring it in three thousand. New jobs. Apple is now going to our manufacturing products in United States. I think there may be some hardship, but the general ideas even without a trade deal at all Britain needs, to make sure it self reliant and they can handle their own food stores in their own medicine. Yet because on their own, they are in trouble, but but again here's my prediction and wrap it up here. I think, I think tromp is going to come in with a very, very favourable deal for the EU arms. I'm sorry, not the EU for the UK to make that point out loud. Look. How well they're doing you tired of winning yet that's gonna, be the flight I could be wrong, will see what happens. But I'm unilaterally with one final note you're someone who likes breaks it and you're, and you sit back get your feet up, don't be surprised if they pull out from underneath you,

This has been delayed for three years. Don't think the fight is over even NBC News saying it's not over, yet the ground excitements coming up at four p m. You did that comes lashed him cast. It is a different channel and I will see while there I got bad news for all you, good God, fearing Christians. Merry Christmas is officially hate speech. Ok, not unlike big social media platforms but at least in certain contexts were about to cross. That threshold is he recently a comedian appeared on the continent. Brian show in what may be when the most relevant caught relevant conversations. I've seen him actually have so much respect Conan for husbands, conversation comedian, Whitney Cummings says in turn, reported her to each hour for saying merry Christmas. The story is not a joke. She's actually sounds like a believer, but

I believe for it. You know why I ve another story and other stores and a few days ago, but it must I must bring it up. Neil Gore, sick Supreme Court justice appears to validate war on Christmas conspiracy during Fox and friends. Amazing They are claiming that Neil Gorse, it is violating the worn Christmas conspiracy simply because he said merry Christmas is people are insane. This story is not ok, mind you, comedian, Wendy, Cummings, told late night, Postcolonial Brian Wednesday,

It was reported to human resources last year for saying merry Christmas to enter, but it's worse than that. She was actually saying by everybody. Merry Christmas and an intern heard it and reported her, and she got in trouble. How insane has this world become? I don't care if you dont celebrate Christmas. I don't care. If you celebrate Hanukkah our Kwanzaa were literally anything. You can make up something and if you come to me and say happy Hanukkah I'll, say it right back. I dont care. You know why. Well, I'm an adult, and I recognise that different people live different lives, so I'm not gonna get mad at you. If you say the wrong thing to me,

I understand the sentiment your expressing their, but I would say it is that someone could be trying to be nice to assuming, like I don't know what you're really your religion as are what you celebrate have have a merry Christmas. They were trying to say a positive thing to to make you like it's a good thing. It's like. I hope you have a great time. I hope you feel well, but it wasn't the right things precisely so it's time we punish you for it. What are they

marriage is Toby and world we live in. Coming. Studies have been told, o Brien, enclosed Andy Rector, those stressful part of holidays, with shopping admitting earlier in the segment that she was a week after as well as at as well as the terminology spawning season. Last year I was working on a tv show gotten. I wasn't. A tv show gotten trouble at human resources for saying merry Christmas twin intern. Is that true, o Brien asked that's true? I was leaving. I was like by guys merry Christmas, like just a formality. What you would say come as explained I come back like June sex age. Our calls and they're like hey. We need to talk to you. One of the internet is pissed off that you said Merry Christmas and twenty eighteen coming served as kosher run around ABC Networks infamous Roseanne reboot. The comedian set her. It was just a formality. Adding I dont even care how your Christmas was its literally like it's the holiday, I'm going to say goodbye outside this man.

You are a change society you dont want because they may Christmas, you dont, do it this way. This is nuts. She did nothing wrong. You punishing people they're trying to beat you down. You simply say to our next time be like I don't want to be a net picker but because we don't all celebrate, would you mind- and you probably say, shore flies and honey man right, o Brien brought up that merry Christmas? Could offender trigger someone in these times coming experts I ain't that she asked the humans resource official what she could have said before they informed her before they informed or the intern was now, that's a basically she's, like

realize it was a church, tentative religion. So, like what should I have said she goes, I was like no, no, no! No! You do not get to do that because, had I known this person was agnostic. That would mean we are in a relationship like that would mean we are intimately connected. I should not know who believes in God and who doesn't? I also can't guess either you know? Yes, that's the point, and this is where we get into the world of Supreme Psychosis when salon dot com accuses a Supreme Court justice of pushing a conspiracy whites because he just said merry Christmas. Ok. You know what then, let me just say right now: it is the twentieth Christmas is approaching. I wish you all a merry Christmas. I am in no way entertaining any conspiracy by doing as such, and I will

so add, because I am respectful to all. If you celebrate something else, I can say happy Hanukkah. I really don't know what else you know what other holiday season things there are, and I mean no disrespect if I didn't say happy whatever holiday, you know you may you may celebrate. Let's read the story: Associate Supreme Court Justice, Neil Gorse it whose appointed by President Donald Trump here's to validate the dubious Fox news claim that there is a war on Christmas during a rare live interview, Tuesday with AIDS. We your heart, because the Fox in France Corsica, appeared to dive into the narrative about an alleged war and Christmas when he pointedly smiled and wished Earhart a merry Christmas at the top of the segment of the president's ferret favorite morning. Show I'm sorry, that's it. It's literally all tat had happened

Karen I'd delusional reality. What banana? Let's stop or second, I'm limits. I some their literally entertaining the idea. They don't seem to understand that people just say Merry Christmas, because they're trying to wish well upon you, he didn't open the show and say I'm sick and tired of people refusing say merry Christmas, I'm gonna say right now, no use a slight though she was like New York. That's gonna, showing us make Christmas that, with its literally becoming hate speech like they will take any any instance of you just like waving in saying hi. Merry Christmas and they're gonna turn it into some kind of offensive gesture. I love that you say that your heart responded, after which she returned to the reading your heart. Peers in an advertisement for vaccination, disturbing platform for Fox NEWS, which celebrates and all American Christmas, yet does not appear to include any people of color

people are saying, while you know what my favorite like mean images, was that a picture of a bunch of women in Scotland for Miss Scotland and some one said like look at all the diversity and then someone responded like dude, it's Scotland did you know that in Scotland people are white like that, such a weird thing, they're they're, angry that a commercial for angels ear Does it include people of color what the commercial probably has like what three people limit these these people are insane there being driven mad by algorithmic manipulation above this quick, I love this subject. I should really draft an article on this, like a really fifteen, a feast of some sort, but basically the articles like a shared well on Facebook include the most insane bombastic

rage and gazing, but more key words. So by combining all of these ideas, Christmas conspiracy, Gore sick Supreme Court people of color, it's all in the story, so it gets more shares, see the way you two works. They don't actually track the words I'm saying to us. Certain degree they do for like swears and get my money way. But if I say something like Supreme Court, it as a verbal phrase, that's not necessarily going to play recommendations it might. They might be changing things, but I absolutely do this. Ok, I do try and makes raise enough specific words in my descriptions, which also notice for these videos take nothing into descriptions. I don't want anything for them. This is how the after craft a story around the key words ticket shares. They say Fox NEWS. Has a long history of claiming there's a war on Christmas tracing back, twenty doesn't for segment by former talk, show host billow, rightly called Christmas under

each this is insanity. He literally just said. Merry Christmas, I love you say that we all know what that supposed to mean other than merry Christmas. There's like a hidden think about you, don't really funny! Ok, I'm already this, but I gotta mention if you think that a fox housed and a Supreme Court justice simply saying merry Christmas, I love it. You say that is actually them trying to validate conspiracy. Theory you're, actually, the one pushing the conspiracy

theory but not by, but I will ask how long do you think? I'm really start actually banning people for saying things like this. They say they gonna think they go and actually talk about billow, rightly segments from two thousand for who cares? The do just said. Merry Christmas on tv, the woman just said goodbye. Merry Christmas, you got are in trouble, as salons Chauncey De Vigo wrote last year, there's another dimension to the war on Christmas as a broader rightwing obsession with the culture wars, both are examples of white identity, politics and a deep desire. You, you know what man this is the epitome of just. You know what I've never seen a more insane leftist article. I'm sorry, I'm sorry, ok did you know. Did you know that Latinos, like people in Mexico, for instance, overwhelmingly Christian, like overlooked flag, ninety percent or more agenda many the migrants,

the US very that Christian did. You know that I feel is not without and they say merry Christmas and you you're, acting like it's a right wing at an white identity, politics than is actually a lot of people in this world who aren't white, who celebrate Christmas in, like other parts of the world, there are people in the Middle EAST or Arabic who are actually are yes work shortly. Christian

so if I don't have a lower limit limit, let me let me read, like they gonna say both are examples of white identity, politics and a deep desire to maintain the cultural and political power of white right wing Christians over all other groups. In many ways the war on Christmas is actually a proxy war for white supremacy. I gotta give you a standing ovation on that one. You know I'm really impressed I'd seen some articles that stuff key words with nonsensical conspiracy theories, but this one takes the cake. This is beyond Alex Jones and I know many of you might actually like Alex Jones, but I'm sorry Jones does talk about crazy stuff. He does. It does tell towers, mutants five g, a lotta, crazy stuff. Ok,

A lot of people are entertained a bite, but this I'm sorry man, I'm out. They should be to it. What what this is a sort of viable gay? Oh, oh! Oh I'm! Sorry! It's also anti semitic added that do you know what men up over it. It's really funny that there's a bit of a paradox in this segment. In that I am arguing that there actually going to you're in trouble for saying Merry Christmas, while simultaneously their arguing, there's a conspiracy of a war on Christmas, and I'm we don't. You know what men welcome the twenty nineteen twenty twenty is gonna, be a who help your excited. I wish you all a merry Christmas and a happy new year. Valise Navvy, Dodd, happy Hanukkah and what's the other one festive festivals that worry about, that is some Seinfeld right, whatever whatever it is, you celebrate up, you enjoy yourself gave a good time, and I hope we all come back in the new year with with glee and,

boy in a positive outlook, because you're gonna need to know why twenty twenty is gonna be insane stick around. I got a couple more Simons coming up in a few minutes, and I will see you all shortly in the UK, the conservatives absent, ITALY and I elated the Labour Party, which is basically like their leftists, and there was a really great article that was written by somebody. I think that they were from the Labour Party. They like it. Basically a democrat right. Imagine if a Democrat said the party, abandoned the working class there preaching cultural? politics that people understand therein. Halting the working class and that's why you lose something that something to that effect, but dammit. You don't seem to understand this. Hillary Clinton I'm going to shut down coal jobs, they keep saying it remember when the Democrats represented Labour Donald Trump. One. And apparently CNN. I don't see the segment by eighty people talking about it where they say Trump is basically these New York Democrat and so the damn cracks are moving left. Trumpet actually moderate relative to the american people, he's not far right at all to deliver the story by

in says he's what- to sacrifice hundreds of thousands of blue collar jobs in oil and gas oh good, sir, if there was anything you could say to guarantee your poles were dropped dramatically. That was it lets read the story, and I have more to add to this because you'd think someone like a casual Cortez would be if on the working class, but no same problem, they dont actually care there, the ivory tower elites. How quickly did Elsie turn shares our interviews immediately the left, our calling about saying she was pulling away from her mood or left Wing Europe's cultural and socialist roots, though she is still pretty far left she's now actually voting? She bought a gap, voted against tax deduction, for are you no end of infinite contractors and I'll get through its complicated? It always is- and I don't want to over simplified by one, we, the Biden thing: first, the collar reports form of former vice present, Joe Biden said during said during Thursdays, democratic debate that he's willingness.

Precise hundreds of thousands, blue collar jobs in oil and gas and effort help fight climate change. When you stop right, there is you thought on in France for the past year, riots in the streets, yellow vests, that's part for the most part due to them, trying to hide the price of gas because of climate change. What do you think's going to happen when you go to me? soda. Look that forty year old man in the eyes and say you know that job you just got back the Trump economy, Trump troublesome economy would what we're both jobs. I'm taken that away from you. I am going to pry from your hand and you won't meal in poverty, as your family suffers to that They want to take away your job. Look, I gotta, I personally like oil and gas. I am also not crazy. My idea, realistic future is a green utopia renewable energies and trees everywhere. I would love to get there the best way we do. It that was through sane, rational policy. We don't get there through just Bert

it all down and sang common had caught up hundreds of thousands of jobs, because what you get instead is not agreeing. Utopia revolution, fear an and chaos. We have a system under control, let's fix it, lets guided and, let's make sure people's lives are destroyed in your ideological pursuit. I certain I have one. I would love to see you in technology. You know we ve grass on their on rooftops, solar panels when generators homes being self sufficient, but I also don't think my biology should destroy someone else's life, which presents a v very, very serious conundrum. How do we attain that future where we protect the environment at the world and make sure humans, arts suffering because of our personal ideologies to challenge. But threats have consistently said. We don't care about you, we don't care about you the individual, we don't care about hundreds of thousands of jobs. If it means we get what we want, because we think we are right as leadership. That is this token. As authoritarian

One other moderators during Thursday debate asked Biden if you would be willing to sacrifice. Some of these are some of the growth that three concession. American President's have seen in the economy. Is economic growth has occurred partly due to oil and gas? the answer is yes. Biden said, even after the moderator noted, the move could displace hundreds of thousands of jobs. The answer is yes, because the opportunity, the opportunity for workers who transition to high paying jobs as Tom's tyres. That is real we're. The only kind That's taken great crises and tat. Them into enormous opportunities, Yo Yo, I just said he just said too the Americans, the millions of Americans watching us, learn to code. We know how that went over that play very well among moderate voters, didn't learn a code. Your call,

God is gone, we will take it away and we're gonna. U can gears Peter Laptop, you figure it out. You think that's gonna work, it's not gonna work. You can lose I'll. Tell you what my problem with this is you do not win elections and push your agenda forward by telling people you will take from them their jobs. The so, let's put this way, do you think Donald Trump and other Republicans are going to be at already active in trying to better the economy, reduce carbon emissions, incentivize, a market that supports renewable The answer is no- and I say this when you go to these people, hundreds of thousands of voters and I'll, take your job, what you're going to do about four tromp because keep their job and protect their family then your agenda of Troy, to change the system and technologies will never happen. Guess what compromise is probably the only way for you to make gains and your cause. Unless really do want to burn the whole world down the way. I see it as there are things that I want.

A clean environment better quality, renewable energies and a reduction in carbon emissions and climate change is a serious problem. Recognize our alot of people that disagree with me I'll. Tell you what what can I give and then I will also in exchange makes some small changes that won't destroy your life, won't take your jobs, but can better our chances towards moving in a certain direction. These are people who yours you are saying you're, an export oil engineer, your petroleum engineer, your call minor wealth through no the fault of your own. We will restrict access to the economy. We will take away your the food and resources and then something up complained about a lot The problem I have with unrepentant. Capitalism is that it does just that that you could be an expert I then because of some new development you now are no longer allowed to have a home or food, and that's bs, the example what say you work for thirty years and is in it was an engineer and certain company or like at the Post office, Now we are seeing. You know,

action in the use of these facilities because we're now doing Amazon other companies emerge. Let's just say you no other audio and Barroso. You them you're a clerk you're, not take your only high skilled labour. You, the cashier at a restaurant- and you ve done your you done it your great at it like that much money, one day they replace it with a key ask through no fault of your own, you ve done a good job. You ve been a loyal. You know about are you of this company. You are now told you will know hunger receive money. I don't like that. I don't want that person now is to lose their jobs and suffer because of technology. That's why drew Yang is talking up some sense. We gotta figure out how we deal with this. We can't just take away P access to the economy, because they be because their skills are now obsolete, because robots are coming and think about what Biden saying about this we're I take away your jobs for our ideology. It's not even about obsolescence. Women, even down to the point where we ve developed biology to actually put displaced these jobs and is already talking about taking your job away

like Andrew Young man, not only that I want to get a shot of the man, because he said of debates. We gotta stop talking about in peace, in Trump and start and talk about what got trouble like that in the first place and its this, they can't see it. The Democrats, a regressive, topside, trumps hundred jobs are being sold there being given away we're gonna bring those jobs back and he won. And if you got a problem with that, need to figure out what the american people really really want and then figure out what you can say to them in exchange for your path to you agenda. So I'll tell you what my position has always been. We will not do so you're jobs. We will make your economy sustainable, your job sustainable and you'll have a good life, but we will try to to create. Parallel energy economy that will create opportunities for future growth and other areas, just because you on Mosque is Craig motorcars. Does it mean that all the car industry is collapsing there

we'll be away to transition after you have slowly that people's lives are being done, Lloyd into a new energy market if it basically, means this. I think there will always be a net negative, but we will minimize it to our maximum capabilities and unwieldy. Our best to make your american people do not suffer, because we have ideological worldview. I I believe I went hunting sent correct. I absolutely I believe we must correct environment, carbon emissions, climate change, all that stuff. Extremely adamant about it. The problem is look to what you see is doing and I see no path forward. I see chaos, I see Failure to negotiate- and I see No, what victory failure, not one Carson voting on the green new deal, complete failure, she's getting nothing I'll, tell you what man take one solar plant over nothing they're saying give up, give give give us over. No, that's not gonna happen, because you're, asking too

away from somebody else. You recognize compromise is the only way you're going to move forward. Otherwise, you will get a year of rights like in France, which echoes out ABC splits, the working Class New York working class New Yorkers to vote against, repeal of trumps salt cap basically I want to get into too much of it. You know because again I'll say. For the meantime, these these issues are particularly complicated and they're, usually reduced by the press into a sound bite that isn't exactly fair, but the general idea here is that Trump repealed the salt cap. What just read? Actually they say this this described. Socialists voted against Moving the salt cap, which would give way in class citizens in high tech states like New York and New Jersey, a brake on state and local dues, the bill which will likely be dead on arrival actually narrowly past smile understand. I could be wrong- is at salt has to do with personal deductions. If you're I got some proprietor or like a ten ninety nine contractor and those are taken,

and are trumpet alot of people panicked about this. They are upset. There was a text cut across the board. So that's that's important point out as well, What would it wrote? The reason I'm bringing this up is because I dont know the idea that Democrats would pretend to be all about the Working class republic. Are unabashed. They have no problem, saying they're going to bring your jobs back and they also have no problem saying they dont, believe climate change is real and they want to expand oil production there telling due to your face were abducted job we're to make more well jobs, at least there being honest the Democrats are saying we're gonna make a bunch of jobs. While not you wanna, take your job away. It seems duplicitous to act. You're in favour of the working class, but then to say on a debate stage will take your job to get from you. So I'll tell you what man you? Don't you you'll want em all you can't winnable, there's not gonna, be a clean sweep. Democrats you're not gonna, come into just take everything you want, it's not gonna happen and the more

you, try the more trump wins. So if you want to make some game, I'll tell you what you did you dont vote for impeachment. Now you gonna lose all your districts. I guess they. There was no matter what, if you want to the environment, and you want to work towards it The future you have to compromise with those who are part of our society and pay taxes alongside you, you can't just take from them. They won't vote for you and you'll, see exactly what happens in the UK, with a massive majority of conservatives dominating, because the Democrats, when you abandon the working since they will take away hundreds of thousands of jobs, don't be surprised when those voters go running single out. I got one more second coming up for a few minutes and I will see you all short. Unsurprisingly feminist for the Mary Sue have written that they actually praetor I too, like bad movies with bad characters, because there can. Earned about how it would look if the movie was and it had a female lead. I guess

can't really understand it, but I can say this: I have problem saying. A movie is good of its good of its bad of Tibet, Ghostbusters TWAIN. Sixteen is a trash fire star wars. Last year I is also a dumpster fire. Wonder woman was great one nineteen eighty four looks really great. I'm excited for those films, black widow, particularly excited about, but I will say the woman, the wonder when nineteen eighty four trailers, like one of the best trials, have ever seen in my life hands down. I love that are cast oh remix of Blue Monday to the beat it was incredible? I don't care for us. Antagonist female, direct or otherwise of the movie looks good I'll, say it's good. Yet we learn something different here. The Mary Sue lights figuring out how to talk about female characters? You dont like when you're a feminist? It's simple just say you don't like it doesn't change. The factory I missed. You can be a feminist and not like a female character, its fine politically I'm a bit of it I like wonder woman. I lie.

Seeing it? I like the idea here is what you said before you know an people. The right, like this less I said, come on guys right, you get iron man, you get Captain America, and you get for you get the big France, as are the marble say, make universe and it's all white men. I have no problem with them being white men, no problem with that making war movies about it. My position is just surprise when a movie comes out with an asian lead or you know, with a black lead or asthmatically. I don't think reality. Anyone really cares. I think it's it's for wanted an to false narrative that conservatism Outraged when you know it's not a white male lead, but the reason I say that some people, like less, is because coming and saying something like it's time. We get a person of color and set about more white men is too legally seen more in line with you now social justice politics, but am I warn you now unnatural totally in favour of diversity and these policies absolutely

I would love to see more more movies, a female leads I'd love to see more more mobile people of color in leading roles, but there's gonna be movies. That's really audits, my praise, for it thence like the Spiderman filming spider, verse yeah. Ass, moralities after Latino. That's fine! I don't care, I like the You know that you're gettin a movie with you now or urban culture perspectives and people of color but that really matters, the end is: did they make a good we can say this. I don't care if the Lee it is one color another I do like it. I like hugged her and whispered back. I think the wonderment nineteen eighty four trailer looks really bad. I also don't like re. So what's your aloud and not like an actor good, for whatever reason, because you just must pretend otherwise will be an offended whatever then everybody, It's what you ve done, wouldn't it be great if we had more movies that you know had female leads, I personally think it would be great so long as they're good movies, but guess what, if their bad, I'm gonna say it lets read. Even I rambled a bit too much last night, I was talking to a friend of mine about star wars, discourse once you son,

stopped industry and whispered to me, don't tell anyone, but I just don't really like Ray. I think she is boring. I hugged her whispered back, I think the wonder, woman, one thousand nine hundred and eighty four trailer looks really bad. I also don't like rice, so what you're allowed not like a character that change anything. Your politics are still here. Politics, whether deeply frustrating aspects of working in this industry is seeing how, quickly and often the leading conversation about a woman led directed movie, especially if it is action comic book. Film is what men think about it and as a feminist pop culture I do not care about elevating that discourse anymore. I want to have Conversation with other women with complicated feelings about tourism characters that are for us. You know its money, we're doing. I'm already doing that. You know it's like what what differentiates captain Marvel from wonder, woman human, what makes them different, they're, both severe foams they're, both storing women- and I think I think they bore

might be directed by women or maybe just wondering what what? What is it? What's the difference, why's that Captain Marvel must be defended outright, no matter what and no matter how at times I praise one one woman, they never say anything. They never Satan, here goes TIM Pool again making a movie about how much he loves a female led. It's always, I can't believe Temple doesn't like Captain Marvel what it would at what a loser massage earnest. I'm I'm I'm a sergeant look at the marble, but I'm not a feminist, when I do like wonder woman, so explain to me what the differences that isn't that difficult she says I do like and I think that a lot of the lure of her is getting is- is getting to have a better female genoa and media as important. Yes, there also what a sofa- and there are also other female jet eyes in the principles of it and have really strong leading roles. But yeah you got no soda, that's the name right! not a big fan of the loan wars. I didn't watch a lot of it, but they sell toys of a female Jedi I guess she became a night in the under it anyway.

Ray is also a star wars, protagonist which right that substantial you, you know, I guess so goes to, but the film which means as an element of boring, typical protagonist aspects about her when talking with aspect, we are doing it to say that she shouldn't be powerful or edges of Mary Sue and the priority of sense a friend was saying is that re feels like a canvas rearmament to put themselves into and not fully realised character and there's a valid criticism. I dont understand white so hard to just say the movie was bad. I guess there so desperate to claim a cultural win forever reason. They can't just say I didn't like the movie That's also weird. They always pretend, like all of the movies in the past, with women leaves and directors, don't exist, but they do the the fact She feels worried about, saying it because it might make her look on feminist is disappointing rally. Will you whose fault it is not you personally, Mary Sue, but some of you, yes, because when I

made several videos about what was wrong with Captain Marvel, and that was pondering- and it was just like super thick in politics and unemployable these peoples, So I started insulting me. This. Our making posts about mean an end to writing me. So if you want complain about it, you're the one, who are insulting people over this because, like I said How many videos to make about wonder woman I made several and not once did you come out here comes to pool again praising feminism. Now that that wasn't the case or, like I said at the beginning when I said A while ago, a long time ago, back during captain marble, I would appreciate you can't expect to see, nothing but white male leads in all of these films. Asian people, like you, know things and you're gonna start seeing these things, and I actually like that idea. I liked the diversity I do. Heavens. Going to insult someone forming a white male, I'm not going to get angry that they make too many white male movies, I'm not gonna be negative about it. I'm gonna be like others what was really great. I really love the marvels of our universe, all what's that

you're making a wish. You know what you're making you know black Panther ghoul on that site. For that sounds fun glad to see some awesome diversity. Let's see how it goes, but it said doktor strange like actually my favorite movie, so they makes movies, with different. You know with female leads that black widow. Finally, I'm super excited for that. I like The idea that we're gonna have different perspectives. Characters and all that stuff, but why? let it be so mean about it, you gonna be like. I think the big problem is, if you're a comic book fan you came out had problems will be their attack you for it, even if you're a feminist you're not allowed to have a problem with it. That's the problem. The problem is from you not from that the people who are talking but how they feel and I'd be willing to pay. I'd be willing to bet a million bucks, most conservative, literally dont care when you announced, are going to do you know Shan T or some cat like an asian late Nokia. We all want checking, chat and gently. We love those movies. Ok doesn't have to be staring typical, come food or a kind of is, but most will don't

here as long as you're insulting them for it and that's the thing I can come and say something like. I would prefer it if the next Marvel film was a female person of color and people are gonna, be like who care it doesn't matter if she is she isn't now. I think that would be nice. I'm also I'm gonna get mad if they dont do it. I'm just gonna, be like here I suggestion and if it does, happen: I'm not going to complain, Bilbil. I know you know it's not my not my company, not my movie, but here's. What I personally believe- and I think you'll find, because this is what I find typically, because I don't insult people. Make it up. You know when that, like a movie comes our something because I'm just like I can respect you not liking the film that typically Donna problems. It's like this. I was I mention this as at the airport, and there was a burn. Support and a chump supporting we're talking. We all got along just fine, because nobody was mean to each other, the Trump voter, like. I don't economies good and the Bernie voter was like yeah, but I just don't like him and his I gotta get it. I stand by. You would feel that way, and that was it

MILES laughs kind against girls. The problem. Is it's not the anti ashtray. W types that well some of em they're, not perfect. They're, not the ones that are attacking people for liking or not like in the movies with Gamer gay with comics gate. Whatever these things happened, it's always the feminists criticized targeting and try to change the perspective or opinions of somebody, because their upset about a certain change and Even when they recognise the content is bad. They refuse to acknowledge it. So I tell you this here's what I respect from the Mary Sue their admitting it and say we need to change your doing the right thing. I agree. Tremendous respect I look forward to reading more articles from you, because you're saying this, I absent I would love to see a feminist film. I mean it. I mean it. So long as you're not bashing, the over the skull and insulting me the whole time right. The problem, The marvel is it's just not that great a film, but the marketing was. For the top, because of that I've said I really

you have no interest in going missing at seeing a film is marketed as feminist, because I have a feeling about what you're gonna do. You're gonna make dumb male characteristic insult me I'll. Tell you what we, The woman is absolutely a feminist felt, the female director in a female lead, and I looked or to seeing more of these acts, especially nineteen, eighty four. So if your will to join me and legitimate criticism of bad characters when they happen to be women, we're gonna, get better feminist films and then real feminism right, I mean in the true sense of the word. Instead wealth, very little bit more that were at the subjects. As my lack of interest in wonder, woman is well noted and for a while I felt really bad about it. I felt I was. I was joking other people's young and I felt like I was. Sing something by not having the emotional reaction. Other Manhattan when I realized that wonder woman while a character, I respect what never an icon for me in that way, nor Images of beautiful white women in power poses do it for me. In that way,

how can accuse you of being an anti feminist or a big it, because you don't like a feminist film that I happen to like. I absolutely respect you don't like wonder, woman and guess what there are many people who are like aunt, I actually w, who also didn't like it, and I respect their opinions because we all have them. I really liked, wonder woman. I thought I was a great contract between realism and idealism between you know correspond character and Delgado, and I'm super excited for nineteen. Eighty four: I said the trailers amazing, but I respect your pay. I don't think you're a big it because you don't like the movie. That's what conversation. We need to be having that some one could not like a film. I just be irregular person who doesn't like to film instead alleviate this, what you all most of you who I can already now, if you criticise ghostbusters you're massage earnest, if you dont, like a certain actress euro, massage earnest, and when you do like us, are an actress mums. The word they say nothing they say literally nothing says he's. Gonna change were allowed to criticise, p without being bigots. It isn't

what you're race, gender identity or anything as nationality religion, if you're a bad person, if you're a bad story, if it's a bad character, were allowed to say that I'll leave it there. Thanks rang out stick around, I will see you tomorrow at ten, a m on this channel cast everyday at six hundred and thirty to six hundred and thirty p dot m. I will see you all then.