Like most of you, are probably aware that after Donald Trump finished giving his state the union address. Nancy Pelosi stood up and tore in half her copy of his speech. Many people saw this as disrespectful. Yet on social media and the left wing or democratic echo chamber there praising what Nancy plus He has done, but in the real world there's gonna be serious consequences for the Democratic Party. Shortly she did this c span, which is not a partisan news network by any stretch of the imagination, opened its phone lines to collars, and many Democrats called in to say there were quitting the party. They would not vote Democrat ever again why men, a Democrat for seventy seven years said this was at some saying they were embarrassed by her behaviour. My pants has now slammed her. Some have called for her resignation but, more importantly, she showed exactly what's wrong with a democratic party right now, instead of talking about

porn issues like Donald Trump was doing she just through fit and tore up his speech today did commentary on the saying that any opportunity for Democrats too to reject Donald Trump statements or chasm of lying Org. On the whole narrative is about Nancy Blowsy, embarrassing, the democratic party. At the same time, Donald Trump, just keeps getting more and more good news is likely going to be acquitted in the impatient proud today, on record so a bit earlier than one that vote takes place and Democrats Accord One story may have given tromp his best weak. Yet when you add what Nancy Blowsy just did I'll say what I have said in the past several weeks, it feels like there is no Democrat part anymore. When we look at the I will carcasses and the whole fiasco. Pete Buddha judge, some out, you know jumping in front of Bernie Sanders. Even though Bernie Sanders has the popular vote, nothing seems to make sense there, accusing each other of cheating it is all falling apart and an end to make matters worse. Amid this entire catastrophe,

people ass. He went and embarrassed the entire party. So, let's see exactly would happen. With the C span story, I have the transcript from the collars. I want to read the steel I want to show some of the reactions, and I want to show you just how good we have. We have excellent news. Jobs numbers are in men, Trump is, is, is headed for re election and one of the collars even said that Nancy Pelosi sealed the deal before we get stuck however, had ordered some cast outcomes lashed on it. If you'd like to support my work, their several ways can give there's a physical ads, Paypal options with the best thing you can do is share this video. I dont want to pretend, like these callers into sea, spanned c span we are literally every Democrat or represent the entire party, but I think it's fair to say on this network, which is not a part as a network. These people do at least speak for many Democrats, many who find themselves be in the middle regular Americans and I gotta admit what saying resonates with me: it's based

What I said this morning, it's what I said last night. What what she did was truly shocking, an embarrassing and when you combine that with all of the other night, nonsense that endless scandals and then they seem to be doing nothing for the american people. The only thing I see is trumps victory over into all that. First, let's start with c span. This is the state of the union reaction C Span opens the phones for viewers reaction to the present state of the union address. First, I want to reach What one collar said I have been a Democrat for, seventy seven years. It was appalling to me. I thought it very this so How can we stop these? These captions are not perfect. He says I found it or fax disrespectful. He is still the president. I am changing my mind. I am now we're going for a Democrat again, I will probably stay home. I am very ambitious just being a Democrat for what they did in the house with policy and the rest of them. They seemed like a bunch, idiot sitting there, the seventeenth

and families in this country of our family name? We, we will have a boat, we He will abolish all gets there again and boycott the Democratic Party. That is how I feel I am fixed. To hang up on you buy. He just stress these collapse transcribed, so the translations are not perfect. Some of the they're, not all from Democrats. Here's one call that set of media tried to make Donald Trump out to be a shallow entertainer. I think the reality is that there are things that are deep things, masses of people that it acted with. There is a little reversal of the Bob Dylan Song in the nineteen sixties. There is, thing going on here and you dont know what it is. Do you, Mr Liberal, we see this one the christian nation that we are has tons of The media and cable news networks and C span won't allow to talk about. With that gap. There is a thin between us getting to say what we really believe in a paradigm shift happening in this country, the

party is over for those that control the truth. Narrative, here's another one. I thought it was discussed Ass, I sat here tonight and watched the whole speech. It was just to watch a state of the union address and watch. My president give a speech on everything great that is happening in our country and yet and see policy and the others who were dressed in white just sitting over there never standing, never clapping for anything that might be good for the country. We stand for anything about that might be good for the country. I dont understand it. I used to be I'm a crap. I am no longer a Democrat. This one says I agree with the other callers. I am a Democrat as well, but no longer will I vote Democrat. I think it is outrageous that they sat when all these good things are happening to our country and how much we love. Country and they looked like they hated our country, Nancy Policy,. The whole time she was sitting up there with that disgusting. Look on her face. It is outrageous,

I will never vote Democrat again. I am sick of it. My whole Family feels the same way. My husband, Friends are sitting here all former Democrats we all voted for Hilary last time. Therefore. Never will we ever vote Democrat again. Ok, this is our there there's. So much more there's out, there's absolutely essential. These colours are actually, I think fair one collar says that look Republicans did the same for all bomber. You know they wouldn't stand and clap, but Nancy policies. Behaviour was an embarrassment for the party she supposed to be the time, democratic. Now, when you hear these regular Americans colonies C Span, that mean literally every Democrat, feels as we know it doesn't, and it could be just that that are the angry, as are the ones that are calling because, certainly on twitter, there are a lot of damage. That's cheering her. I think this is a grave error on their part, though you just lost middle Americans, you lost the independence and the lifelong

Democrats supported you and your cheering for it. I thought I was gonna comedy at this morning that but on social media, are saying. Nancy policy has effectively taken away Donald trumps, new cycle that state of the union address was gonna, have all of these great things that all the Republicans could talk about, but because of policy she stolen that, and now all there Doing us talking about how she snubbed the president, it so silly to me, Donald Trump got to say all of these beautiful things to America. Even the collars on C span, were saying all these great things. The Democrats didn't argue against it. The Democrats didn't call tromp a liar. I mean many. Did the main narrative is that Nancy Pelosi just tore up the speech. What is happening there no one will ever have that argument. The media cycle,

now dominated conversations like this and that's what I'm showing on Twitter. They say, I'm sorry, the top trot trend, Nancy Pelosi rocks Nancy, the ripper and the third Pelosi tanned. From now here's the thing earlier this morning, Pelosi tantrum was number one Twitter is not in representative of the entire country. When we are seeing top comments, rag on policy, you need to understand its about two percent of this country. Driving this conversation. I actually think it's much more fair to look at C span and see what these democratic I think now sure arms. I'm sure a lot of these people are gonna, say all those Democrats saying there quitting they're lying, not limit. Let me say this: I never consider myself a strong Democrat I've. Ever been someone who went around the d or campaign for his politician. Some people call me a Democrat for some reason. I voted for Obama await vote again and I did vote twenty sixteen, so I am not sure

wrong guests. You know lefty or democrat, but I have supported Democrats. I supported Andrew Yang until she gabert Scylla, big fan, and I have always consider myself at least to be if it ever came to voting Democrat Democratic, I'm talkin about so take their such statements for what it is, but that to me was was just a kind of like a last straw. I mean keep in mind. The cheating in the I will caucus, while our actions of the king and I will focus but the cheating with MIKE Bloomberg. You know they checked the dance, he changed the rules on the stage. Why am I gonna play any game with you sought out I'm completely out, I'm completely independent. I was looking forward to Yang or autopsy gabert, but I dont think voting for the matters at this point because the game is rigged. All around and policy is an harassment. What am I don't think so? Dishonoured the moment pen

slams policy for ripping trumps state of the union speech. I think that says it best right, but saw let's. Let's let's read some quote. I think it was a new No, I wasn't sure if she was ripping off the speech or ripping off the constitution pen. Sad during interview on Fox and friends Wednesday morning. The contrast here was President was spent an hour and a half making a speech about America and Nancy. Pull in the final moments tried to make it all about her, and I think the american people see through it. I think vase they see through the pettiness and see through the politics of all of it. He went on there's always a basic the quorum and a basic respect, but to have our stand up and tear up that speech really dishonor the moment, and I really thought it was beneath the d. Of a joint discussion of congress- and I think it will be- will be remembered as such, not below. That was the courteous thing to do. Look.

What immediate defences on the left is going to be that, while Donald Trump always makes it about himself and that's fair, but here's what you don't understand. The Democrats who called into C span and our quitting the party and people me we ve never like that. Donald Trump makes it about himself. We ve never like Donald Trump attitude are so blinded by their tribal zealotry. They think the only people upset by Nancy policies, antics art from supporters. No moderate and independent voters have bank have been repeatedly expressing these thoughts and opinions. Poles have ITALY come come out showing that more moderates believe that the left has gone too far left the law last thing they needed was a nail in the coffin of Nancy

see standing up with our smog, face and and and and thus marks, he was making the grimaces and then shredding the speech, the speech that included one of the last Tuskegee airman veterans morning- families- it was not just about Donald Trump Tromp was talking about America and, of course, has a republican Republicans were cheering for the most part, and many Democrats wouldn't stammered. Sometimes they Kirsten Cinema, for instance, is being cheered by moderates and conservatives because she gave the president respect because he get he had her back on parental leave. Legislation and I'll get I'll show statement, but now one of the more shocking results of this are not bad titled. Now, the policy should resign from Jonathan Turley I remember him as one of the witnesses in the impeachment trial and he said it. That's it. Pelosi should resign. He writes The house has its share of infamy is great and small real and symbolic and

has been the scene of personal infamy from brawls to canings, but the conduct of Speaker Nancy also the state of the union address this week will go down as a day in for me for the chamber as an institution while it has long been a tradition for how speakers to remain stomach and neutral. In listening to the address, Pelosi appeared intent on mocking pro and dropped from behind his back with sophomore facial businesses and had shaking culminating in her ripping up a copy of his address, her drop them moment. What a lasting impact on the house. While many will celebrate heard falling of the president, she tore up something far more important speech, Policy has shredded decades of tradition, decorum and Seville. That the nation could use now more than ever. The house be is more than a political. Partisan particularly when carrying out functions such as a state of the union, address a president

here in the house as a guest of both chambers of Congress. The house speaker represents not her party offers or herself, but the entirety of the chamber. At that moment, She must transcend her own political ambitions and loyalties. Tensions for this dress were high. The house in future, just set as a group in front of the president as a reminder of the ongoing trial that can be accessed. Used as a silent, but pointed message from the Democrats. Tromp hardly covered himself with glory by not shaking hands of policy. I'm gonna to stop there and make that point. Many of you may have noticed that as well that, when he handed the copy, I believe, is a copy of a speech to pants and policy she reached out to shake his hand and immediately turned around it's possible that he's not there? It is also positive, that penitent reach out his hand and trumped didn't really notice, and it wasn't intentional but more importantly, I to wonder why Pelosi tried shaking his head in the first place when there an ongoing impeachment trial that she started. Why

would she offer up her hand and expect trumped shake it when she has challenged the legitimacy of his office amid all of his punishments. And yes, I'm going to show you them. I don't know, but I have say I dont believe it's in my opinion trumped in snub policy by not shaking her hand, Pelosi snub Trump by trying to make him shake her hand. Amid all of the trouble she's caused and the failures that have that have ensued from it. But, let's ride on, I also strongly disliked elements of his address which bordered on it. Heck under your seat moments and the awarding of conservative radio host rush Limbaugh with the presidential metal of freedom inside the House gallery like a Marty, grub bead toss. However, if tromp made, the state of the union like opera policy made it look like the Jerry Springer Show. What followed was an utter disgrace. First, place dropped the tradition greeting before the start of address members of Congress. I have the high privilege, indistinct honour of presenting to you, the President of United States, instead

she's? She simply announced members of Congress, the President of the United States. It was petty and profoundly inappropriate. Putting aside the fact, this is not her tradition, but that The house is no excuse to note that the president was impeached such an endeavour He was not impose on President Clinton during his own impatient proceedings. Malicious jumped down to the bottom where, where he says, policy demolished decades of tradition, with this poorly considered moment of co many will celebrate her conduct and be thrilled by the insult a trump, but even the Us who disagree with his policies should consider what pollution destroyed in a moment of rage. She shredded the pretence of God with civility and dignity in the house, notably, she did not wait to wrap up her copy. Of the speech. Until after she left the house floor, she wanted to do it in front of the cameras at the end of the address and with the president's still in the chamber. That act was more important policy than preserving the tradition of her office. In doing so, she forfeit

the right to occupy that office. If policy cannot maintain the dignity and neutrality of her office at the at the state of the union, She should resign as speaker of the House of Representatives and guess what none of this excuse is anything Donald Trump. As has said, I keep hearing from the left. Oh all the trunk the porters all angry, but what about Donald Trump and what he's done? Yeah I I've criticized that too, and I've even question some of his policies. I think you're blind by your tribalism business insider Rights Democrats may have handed tromp his best weak ever and given him a crucial momentum for reelection. One of the comments from C span: said just that near the end of the segment, someone actually says this has solidified Donald Trump Ray election, I will say that with a simple rip of the paper. Nan, policy has pretty much sealed. The deal on a real,

action of Donald Trump, when, indeed that voters see that watch the rest of his speech, the optics offer being so childish to rip that speech. After the ending of the speech right for the soldier is brought and reunited family from Afghanistan. The objects of are so horrible. They are so childish. It definitely plays too, of the Trump derangement syndrome crowd when you have independent vote is that listen to the under that speech? They see that whole segment, Ripping pages you have lost, any independent voter that been wondering if I go with that person that is there or do I take a chance on an unknown in the Democratic Party and there it is but check this private payroll sore in January, the best monthly gain and nearly five years. How can this possibly be that Donald Trump has won at every turn? Impeachment has failed acquittal by the time you watch. This is probably already been

quitted, some Democrat senators are actually planning on supporting him mansion for then said he should be censured, not removed. Now it's gonna come out just like it did in the house. With democrat defectors. Impeachment was so miserable Democrats actually lost. Jeff Andrew now regular, all voters are expressing their opinions, as Nancy Policy has done. Everything in her power to destroy the tradition of the my credit party, and then you need only look at what's going on with Iowa now you ve probably been ff, following this too, is a couple things to point out? Voter turnout is abysmal, and now I get a voter turnout kind of moderate, but based on what they projected and what they needed to win. The people just didn't show up, more importantly, is the optics of what's happening. If the Democrats can't run a vote, how could they run the country or hub

the fact that, as of right now, they ve been slowly trickling out little bits of information Iowa makes it appear like PETE Buddha judges, the winner, while PETE Buddha Judge, is losing the popular vote to Bernie Sanders. I the Democrats were ragging on that system, electoral college, and they said no. It should be the popular vote. I guess up until it's their own party and their interests and they want Buddha judge to win now. They love the delicate system and they don't care for the popular vote. How about those objects or, in the end the insane comments made on MSNBC, which I'm not gonna, pull the article. I know we'll get me in trouble on Youtube where they claim The only reason that Democrats aren't turning out to vote in Iowa is because their white and feel no sense of urgency there. They are off message. They have no message there, spinning encircles, they didn't even try to counter Donald Trump message, or, I should say,

perhaps they did try, but in her rage, dancing Pelosi took away any opportunity, and now we can the media right, which is often very critical of Donald Trump, saying state of the union speech- Tromp beats Democrats at messaging game. You know why he did. I mean it's fair to say for one. He has a big megaphone as the president, but there was a democratic respond, democratic response afterwards, and I have a really seen anybody care pay attention or quote from it. Nobody is talking about with them that's responded with their only talking about the embarrassment. That is Nancy policy. While and I'll be honest. I actually defended her you know last year, especially with the rise of the far left. But now I can see she is the worst person for office in and dare I say I don't know if I want to come-

lately agree with Jonathan Turley about her resignation, but he makes really good points. I would say this: I'm not gonna play the game of tromp should or should be present, because he's got a bad attitude as well. I will take a look at both him and Nancy Policy and I'll tell you this trump is a bad character. I M not a day goes by don't talk to some local or neighbor who or what, while they can praise the accomplishments, they think is attitude is awful and they wish you wouldn't say things. He did. I agree you can't you you, you can't deny the economy is doing well. The numbers are great. We see the data, but you can deny that tromp is also a kind of a mean person. So here's the thing I'm gonna, let the voters decide come November and I think trouble get reelected, because people recognise his bed attitude but take a look at Nancy Policy and what does she extremely bad attitude. Lack of decorum all the should criticise Trump or suppose accept none of the accomplishments.

So I don't wanna say she should resign because people's in sending about tromp because of his behavior, I will say she should not be re elected because she's failed at every turn, an embarrassed the party and that's the most important takeaway I'll leave their stick around next. This coming up at Youtube outcomes. Lashed him cast news. It is a different channel, that'll, be at six p M banks rang out, and I will see you on next time. It would seem that in her rage, Nancy Pelosi made one of her biggest mistakes. Yet we all know impeachment was a boy mistaken letter today, doll drop is likely will, in all likelihood, gonna be acquitted, taking a huge victory lap and claiming is exonerated, but last night The state of the union address. Donald Trump was whispering sweet nothing's into our ears, telling us of this beautiful country and booming economy.

National security and many other great things, including the new trade, deal the benefit to farmers, and very often he got a standing ovation from Republicans and periodically Democrats actually did you. For him, especially as the honoured many of our servicemen but Nancy Policy, in her rage, shredded Donald Trump speech. As he closed his state of the union address what this did was shifted the inquiry and the entire conversation from trumps speech to her rage, of course, on Democrat ECHO Chamber social media, there praising the move, saying, ah all of trumps talking points now there being shifted away and that the new cycles no longer talking about what he was saying. Another talking about Nancy Policy

internal, five, even seen some conservative say the same thing. We should be talking about trumps achievements in a speech, not Pelosi dont. Let us take the narrative they're saying she emasculated the president behind him where's, the big problem. You see the talking point the Democrats needed was that tromp was lying. In fact, it's what try using in the first place, but now there is no opportunity to refute what Trump said. Let me pay you a picture. My friends are all sitting here. Listening to address were giving commentary were cracking jokes but for the most part were saying that's a good thing, tromp saying good thing and we are all fairly be no moderate waller. Some conservatives here, but you know me and my buddy are fairly. You know lefty and work I like, I mean these things are not bad things. Trump saying he's a great great things, yet the unemployment is down. Seventy two percent of new jobs. Went to women. That's amazing and the Democrats wooden clapped for that stuff, so when Nancy Pelosi ripped these things up.

The conversation, the opportunity to address what tromp had said, ceases to exist, Let me show you an example: I have the story and then we'll Ambler, a little bit you tell me share. Is it? Has the hill reporting Pelosi rips up Trump speech at conclusion? state of the union, but let me just show you how not to these people are in praising plus you for doing this. My immediate reaction. I tweeted policy shredded trumps speech seriously. Ask these people what is wrong with them? It's got three thousand four hundred and twenty eight retreats. Now three and I said there's because I was genuinely shocked. That's my legitimate reaction. Tromp finished his speech. We are talking at met at an inn. The studio about how we hear all these great things were Trump and what did I say, and what what are my friends all say? Well, of course it sounds good because Trump

telling you all the good things where's the rebuttal where's, the counter where's, the criticism. Of course, if trumps going to give you a speech you're going to like what he has to say, that's the point, not everybody, of course, but at least most of it will sound good. Well, thanks Lucy, that was it instead of us actually may haven't conversation about trumps talking point and whether they are true or not. Now we're talking about Nancy Policy and that's exactly Republicans needed. This means that Donald Trump was able to whisper sweet nothing's into your ears. With out criticism, without push back. Instead, we saw Nancy, plus you throw a temper tantrum and that doesn't make her or the Democrats look good. It makes them look petty. Take a look at the first response an hour to Omar Bizarre who responded much respect. I appreciate that he was actually trying to standpoint. He said what more upsetting to you, the meaningless theatrical of the opposition or the dozen plus false

or misleading statements. The present told the american people. He then linked to a store of many times. I think these two tweets exemplify exactly why Pelosi made a huge, huge mistake. At least some people A critical of trump are trying to stay on message. Trump told you all these good things. Please. Let me counter what he said. My genuine reaction was not that he asks me more upsetting to the lies with a theatrical I'll, be completely honest, the theatrical. You know why, because trumped says, and I have no immediate reason to assume these- that the data points it was giving on unemployment- anything not our or otherwise, where necessary really wrong. It doesn't mean. I trust him it made to set up such a thing and now it's your turn to come out and tell me otherwise also in Trump speech. He praised servicemen and and he talked a reunited a family. With someone who is deployed, I mean things had nothing to do with facts or or or anything. It was heartwarming to see the British, the now brigadier general

that's the last dusky airman stand up and salute, while everyone cheered for him, that was that was heartwarming Nancy policy rip that two so of course her shredding. The speech was shocking there. If there were more, earning families there she ripped that up to so yes, I will fully admit after drops out everything me and my friend we're talking about whether or not he was only tongue ass, the good stuff, and now we're not talking at all, and I really this morning? When I see the top trend on twitter policy tantrum, I find it funny. It's not. You know, praise to policy its most people being like wow. She had a ten percent, and what what we see from these two tweets is that my reaction was nothing to do with Trump. There will not be a conversation about what Trump said being true or false every network is probably in IRAN worldwide coverage of policies, reaction and she said,

Something like it was the appropriate thing to do you not consider any alternative, which is what well for a first want to show you this united trends policy. Tantrum number one in the: U S, well, Donald Trump himself Treating about it, we can also see unbecoming, be a Nancy. The Ripper Nancy, the Reapers, probably both positive and negative unbecoming for the most part, is now and there was another trend popping up that was you know, Nancy. The policy rocks or something like that, but it was only a few thousand tweets so unbecoming in twenty six to twenty six thousand, but the number one trend in the: U S is policy tantrum They have successfully allowed Trump to say whatever he wants and now no one will ever think twice because she shifted the narrative get it now. Tromp was able to.

They all these great things to everybody, and that's all will hear of it. Let me show you this: the White House tweet, they said speaker, pull see just ripped up, one of our last surviving Tuskegee airman, the survival of a child born at twenty one weeks. The morning families of Rocky Jones in Callum Mahler. Ah, sir, members reunion reunion with family that's her legacy. You can criticise the president, but now the space has been taken away because Nancy Policy was angry and what do you think democrat bubble? Social media sang their praise? her for doing it, let me show you some the number one post on our slash politics, and this is a really good example of what's wrong with red. It you'd think our slash politics would be a space for people to actually engage in politics, but it's not the Donald where people actually support the president is quarantine. For dubious reasons and our slash politics, which has a lot of the same nonsense. You know

and is extremely partisan is one of the most prominent sub credits on the platform. Here we see the first First, when asked about ripping ripping the speech question, why did you tell the speech policy because it was the courteous thing to do. It was the courteous thing to do considering the alternative. The next comment: it was a clever move, romp just held a state of the union speech and the old, thing the media is talking about, is Nancy blowsy. She hit him right where it hurts. That's all! I'm seeing in Australia and media. My four heck. I am against. It not even getting my friend who has no interest in a met. My friend has no interest in american politics. Just ask me who ass. He was and what was she ripping up? That's Nancy, the patron saint of Shit, saint of Shade bugger me was not expecting this is another one. It's even better when you consider trumps reaction, which is stand by closely staring off the distance as the one

behind him, emasculated him on national tv, oh boy is foe news ever going to be busy today. I wish he'd do a twenty minute, long call that has the couch crew itching to let him get back to work, sir. Let me let me let me collapses and see what the next thread comment. Is I like this, making bigger news in anything tromp had to say he lie for two hours, this is not news anymore, and there, it is everything Trump said, went into the ears, the hearts and minds of the american people and the Nancy Pelosi stopped the conversation, their convinced Trump lied. That was there too. In point now, they're praising that it will never come up in the media. Look man when I'm talk. My friends and their saying what trumps eyes sounds good and they were walk away and that's all they heard Trump, just one water. I can't believe any of these people This is absolutely absurd. There's a Jeff of it. I guess

did anyone else noticed trumps sign an autograph to an old guy with a literal stack of money popping out of his shirt pocket, and then he says I ve been form their fake forty five dollar trump bills, which I don't it's funny that serves a guy who had forty five dollar bills, trumps uniforms of president, and it was like sticking out of his pocket Trump signed them. Here we go. Great Jesus the pro tromp responses to this on Twitter, their clutching every per on the hemisphere and popping the global monocle supply over how disrespectful this was have these people. Never encountered even to unscrupulous sentences by tromp wholly ass. I can't even fathom the cognitive dissonance here they say trot laughed about grabbing women's genitals, a woman reps up his and she's, the one being told she's road went there a nice one when you get down to it. It's just about her being a woman and him being a man trumps, a man and you, rich, so is allowed to do what he wants because he's a stay genius TM, and he knows sport is a woman, so she no her place. Ok, literally, no one said that that's how

see the world? No, they don't the same mentality. They apply when calling african Americans uppity, they see some, I believe, deserves to be downtrodden, expressing any form attitude or disrespects toward their authority figure and blows their minds. We stop right. There is what's funny to me: they live in a bubble. You know as its come up many times. You know Jack Dorsey mentioned on the same hairs. Podcast came up with Rogan last year, when I was on his podcast with with Dorsey leftwing journalists were only following. Leftwing journalists and conservative journalists were following both I tend to follow. Both these people have no idea, what's really being said, I'll, tell you this. I talked to a guy who lives near me who voted for the president and he complains about trumps attitude. You look at the at the polls. Fox news does, or the or the men, industry, interviews and people say things like. You know, they'd vote for tromp. They just wish. He wasn't such you know

bore a boorish old man or braggart, or crude and crass everybody criticizes Trump for his attitude now is die hard supporters, loved cheer him. You can criticise them, but that's not the sixty three million. That's the smaller handful of really die hard. I can do no wrong people, whereas most of the Trump supporters are critical of him to a certain degree, but risk but Anderson and that for the most part you never completely agree with the president and now looking at Nancy Policy, was offered up no real solutions to the problems the country is facing other than to constantly complain about the president is my favorite peace? Here's my favorite bit about all of this. I have never been a big job supporter, never I'm ambivalent for the most part and a kind of don't like the guy. That's why I've always been I laughed when he won, but whatever it's another, didn't. I I've criticized him for his behaviour. I've criticized Andrew Yang for calling him a fat slob and I will criticising and see policy right now for tearing up that speech. Yet they act like it is,

really the die, hard tromp, Muggah zealots who actually care about this. This is why they will lose in the real world in America. Regular. Africans were sitting on their couch. You know eaten nachos, ordinary people. So whenever they were doing that night. Maybe that fried chicken for dinner- and I watched Donald Trump say all of these beautiful things. Now everything topside wasn't great everybody some of the things he said probably made some people not so happy, but he talked about some great economic stuff and regular Americans are gonna love that, they are not sitting there. Screeching about you know, trumps behaviour they're not die hard trump supporters. Irregular Americans who her great thing

and then saw stand behind the president. After all of the good things he promised an accomplished, Pelosi tears it up. Imagine if you're in the rest about you know Michigan Ohio, Pennsylvania. These are states that voted for Trump. Imagine you're in Michigan and Ford is bringing back that plant. These are a lot of people who don't care about politics. I went to a furniture store. Ok, we set up this new room. This new podcast YO and the sales woman told me last year was the best year of her career terms of how much money she made the sales she was doing and she was not super political should know a lot about it. So imagine this these people, who don't pay attention of politics who don't know about what what trumpets, promising or otherwise are now being told. First that he's a liar. The economy is doing well. The Democrats gonna stage- that's not working for everybody wants working for most wages are up economy is growing record low unemployment, a thing

workin out for people, but they tell you it's not. Ok, I'm pretty sure you tell that salesmen, who just told me she made more money, dear than any other yearn for life and for the first time, I've heard it from other people there's a business twenty nine it was amazing. You tell them you kind of bad they're gonna, to look at you and so on, are all bottle that, but then the only real opportunity you had was to call out the president on anything else. He said, but policy decided to take it all away policy in her rage. That's what she did. So it's funny to meet to read these comments on right it where they absolute We believe it was the smart thing to do and that why they lost in twenty. Sixteen, that's why was low. Voter turnout in Iowa do you guys know that you have you been falling? Might my comment to make my commentary and this they were talking about record voter turnout- I was I was going to see that was gonna, surpass that

two thousand and eight and they needed record turn out in order to beat Trump instead, the Caucasus, the disaster, the talking points from most Democrats and most of the left is chaotic, accusing each other of cheating, accusing Buddha judge of being a spy. It is it is, it is falling apart, and what do we see now? Take the dancing cheated to get Bloomberg under debate stage. They could not even handle their own caucus, they can't count votes they couldn't using up and then Pelosi thought it was appropriate to shreds speech. That was shifting the whole discussion to decorum and that's what we see now. We don't see the Democrats off. Promises. They haven't gone on tv and sad, here's with accomplished for the american people all there. Ever said is Orange man bad the past several years, without Russia get Ukraine Gate, impeachment and other presents gonna be acquitted, and what does not? what does a regular American see this year, President who says here

I've done for you and she rips it up. They see a president who goes on trial for impeachment get acquitted, Now many will say yeah, but the Republicans said no witnesses do think the average American knows or cares, as they even pointed out. The guy said my friend asked me how Nancy, and what does she rip up yet exactly? They don't know anything about that that the nitty gritty of politics, like most of us, do so I'll. Tell you this Nancy Pelosi made a huge missed. Like she was angry in her rage. She just helped Donald Trump and it seems like that keeps happening. Let me let me end by saying just one more time. The Democrats needed to counter trumps speech me in my and were hearing great things from him, and I say, but keep in mind his own.

I'm telling you the good stuff, that's what he's going to do so, where were the Democrats to come out and say now? Here's what you missed then happen because Nancy Policy shift the entire new cycle to her tougher tantrum and as much as these people are like how you go Nancy. I assure you regular, Americans are not saying. While it was really great that the speaker of the house just throw fit they're going like yikes, I was my reaction so you want to act like it's all trump supporters who are going to God and clutching their pearls. No, no. I criticized tromp furs his attitude. I criticise Yang for calling the fat slob you get it. You get it as a regular Americans or anything I'll leave it. There stick around neck segments coming up at one p m on this channel, and I will see you all them. I can't believe it. James, O Keefe of Project, fair toss, suspended on twitter. Demanding of attraction from a journalist who posted false information, oh heavens, who could have ever seen this coming accept literally,

Everyone saw it coming, but that's not the first time. Verities has been censored, I've been censored for talking about project veritable, they might be delete this video, some bringing it up? You see, a couple that it was. It was a couple days ago. It was the day of the iolcus, the third, when James O Keefe published a video exposing and Elizabeth Warren staffer who was, She's too focused on these. These woke issues and regular Americans. Don't care about it. Well! For some reason, Twitter went back to January twenty second to a tweet where James requested a retraction from Dave, widen I believe, still of the Washington Post and they sat. Apparently it was what what what we'll see what they claim to what I think it was harassment or like private information. It was journalism. Find a really interesting that no one in the media world cares for the most part, when James O keeps rights to publish news as a journalist are threatened and for obvious reasons they don't like the fact that he makes their ideology and there

he'll tribe, look bad, you see, one is other journalists like it was. I think it was channel. Four in the UK did an under cover sting o everybody loved it when the all right was exposed and an undercover thing while the media loved it when James Oki filled Bernie, sit, filmed burnt Zander staffers talking about gulags for conservative well all of a sudden it. But this is illegal. He's he's invading privacy or it's out of context, but he's editing it. Ah, yes, that's right, the media's biased they say. Let me tell you some we're in a red about James O Keefe. He should not have been I didn't I'll show you the tweet its absurd, but you see I did a video about James O Keefe months ago. It was the pin to restore things. Last year you tube deleted the video out right it has gone from my channel and even notice. A few days later, people started messaging me saying: why is this

video about where it has gone. Sharks I looked and there it was it was completely removed. It was it was weird. I never saw anything like it. I think it a notification. Eventually, I found something buried in social tab of my email and when I reached out to Google and said YO bring my video back. They said no and the Gimme a b s reason that oh, but you published someone's name or something I didn't. Then a publicly available website. I'm commenting on a new story going viral too bad. Well, guess what happened on the day of the ILO caucus when I published a yo about project, their task with commentary some strange happened around four p m BC. Ninety nine point: nine percent of my political commentary. Videos are monetize and confirmed their something called self certification. All videos on my main channel, their typically me talking, but the political process. What is what is the port of, whole numbers or the Democrats do this time was going off impeachment, and so I

a story about a war in staffer, criticising her forgetting to woke and ignoring kitchen table issues, and I commented on it. I got a lot of Asian that, at the very last minute, when the point of view, was to go, live around four, that the video contained sensitive issues dealing with war and terror. Well, that's certainly not true, but you know what happens when they give you that notification, the video gets suppressed viewer ship was down by around fifty percent of the average, and I thought to myself. You know that this has happened before I've done videos but anti FA, which I'm soup, which surprisingly they suppress learned my lesson when they d monetize a video and tell me things like that. I have no choice but to move it. I've talked about the past and after this channel is for a lot of these videos get suppressed a lot of em, No, you won't see yoga notifications either my main channel them do one video per day, so I tried make sure it's basically the biggest culturally rubber,

store in right now. That's that's typically politics! So when I did a video, a democratic headquarter, an anti fought and they said: I said I was like woe and I didn't I, I realized I went on, I blurred a bunch of stuff and they were stored. It so sure. Whatever well sure enough? I sent a request to Google and I said this is a false flag like a false flagging of the vote. Oh there's, no war or terror. In this I'm talking about Elizabeth Warren, my video got suppressed James O Keefe got suspended from Twitter weird right. Well, something happened around too. They were stored. The video that's right. They restock the video the primary was over and then email saying sorry about that. It's been fixed and then I my analytics. Some of the views start to come back This oppression was removed, but guess what, from the time period of publication too too, I am views were suppressed by over for the hour, I would say around fifty per and, by the time they restored it, it never recovered. In fact, you

go to my channel. You can look at the worn, video and compare the views on it to the views of the past several videos and you can look at the past years. I don't I I've done on the project, fairness expos eyes, and I think it's fair to tutor to say, based on. Me actually having to email, Google and back, please remove a suppression and the fact that the video did getting more views at around two hundred thousand the other videos the day before three hundred they're very toss, videos, three hundred three, fifty four hundred, but this one was knocked down. I think it's you know. Look, I don't think it's a conspiracy. What I think, It is our people who work at the social media companies who love Elizabeth Warning. So in project vera, started. Doing this x pose a they dug. They dug back to an old tweet from the twenty second and they got him shut down. And when they saw my video, the people working in California who manually flag videos, maybe

an accident. Maybe it was bias. I don't think so. I dont think was an accident again, not a conspiracy, but highest person being like this is too sensitive for you suppress, that's probably what happened and that's why I escalated at this. Had sorry about that removed it. I can't imagine, was an accident that ninety nine point, nine Some of my views are always monetize. In fact, I dare I say in the past three months, one hundred percent monetize. I think it's strange that the one time They suppress it. It's around the same time, the iolcus when James O Keefe gets a splendid, two or three little, but the store this Twitter has suddenly locked project vartos founder James, O Keefe out of his account after each after he treated at port from the Washington Post and successfully requested a retraction Ryan's of it. Tweeted Twitter, suspends project virtues founder that we get it. So here's the image from James O Keefe

it says your account has been locked for violating the posting of private information twitter as determined that as a journalist, you have no right to post certain. Things, because the information James O Keefe got wasn't secret information, it was publicly available, but we see how they are, they behave if it in instance. You have you: VE I am sorry in the past, you ve had actual democratic candidates. Outright threatened, adopts people called look at Covington case, none those people got suspended or banned. It was all a okay and we talked about this project or sea, but they did seem to care I mean they did at its unfair, but I would say they pretend they seemed. Care, that's the right when it, but they seem to care, but in my opinion, likely did not theirs. They all You'd understand Simon, listen, he said retraction request date odd. If waigel of the Washington Post to the subjects featured and expose twenty twenty are not sanders. Volunteers, both Kyle

and Martin Weisgerber are still paid. Employees of the Bernie Sanders campaign kindly retract another factually inaccurate. Bit of reporting twenty second and they finally, can there. Now, I'm sure they were you. Not people were flagging. James O Keefe, I'm sure they flag. Almost every treaty put puts out claimed, that is, videos are literally illegal. Why now? I don't know, I guess I can honestly say They say yes to remove the tweets that violate our rules. Twitter claims, o Keefe its rules around posting private information after he responded to a tweet I'm Dave Waigel report, the washing I was that accused project where toss putting moles in the campaign to find that sanders. Volunteers talk, I already like they do on Twitter Waigel was going to undercover videos from project Berytus which spoke Sanders campaign, staffers, Kyle, Jerk and Martin wiser, wiser weisgerber, wiseguy resident calling for violence, o Keefe tweeted back at Waigel

ex featured we're, not volunteers, there still paid employees might extending. They still are waigel deleted this tweet minutes later, and there you have it. James was right, It appears that Twitter suspended Oki for posting, either the names or the paste. Ah, but despite both individuals being newsworthy subjects and paced up being publicly available on the F p C website, o Keefe will now be on. Between from his account until the suspension is lifted, o Keefe lamb, suspension and said they dont, suspend Dave Wiggles account. They suspend us for for rectifying the erroneous information that Waigel tweeted surprise. Surprise like whose whose shocked by this I mean it's a things really really bad. You don't have to you know the biggest problem we have with these. These journalists activists is that when they approach news, the first question is not: is it true, the first car as does it help or hurt my ideology. So when I look at James O Keefe, the last thing I consider or what

I should say down the list of things like of considerations is his personal bias. It plays a role in my assessment of his work. The first thing I consider is: is it true? Well guess what very ass publishes videos and you see their mouths and lips moving. Ok, mine, findings that James has numerous retraction from tons of people who have lied about the work he does. If I see a video clip and someone says ABC one: two: three: is it possible it's out of context? It is in this circumstance I tend not to think that's the case. So those are the considerations down the line. First, there's a video of theirs text and I'll do that. Only one left or right. When I read a story, it's the same way these other journalists, work. The Washington Post and is these other companies the first thing they it was. They say, but is James, O Keefe, conservative or they say he's conservative I don't consider the actual information presented until after they question his,

bias, which is why they always things like all right wing journals. Instead of a journalist, they consider his or is planned who orientation is a conservative first and not him as a journalist. I wonder that Now, you'll often see that I will do. That is why I say a left wing journalist and that's kind of the point right We are entering a world now where that those The considerations that are being presented, and so basically everyone now as a journalist is defined by their political ideology. I dont know what I would call me because I think it's funny that conservatives call me a liberal and liberals call me a conservative, because maybe I'm just in the middle, but you know it doesn't seem to work from home. Nobody else region. They say in the Caucasus and other popular twitter account. Comfortably smog was temporarily suspended after tweeting out where's hunter fat, a reference to twenty twenty presidential candidate, Joe Biden, calling a voter fat and days

the Caucasus the Twitter account of zero hedge with suddenly hit with a permanent ban after Buzzfeed planted at dawn. Someone by sharing publicly available information ice I did last year if you thought it was bad in the past few years, wait until twenty twenty and as we get caught, our two November, it's gonna, light up baby. I hope your trapped in and ready for that rollercoaster. One of your favorite accounts go belly up and get purged from the internet because it has begun. The I will cost is here. My video got suppressed for dubious reasons. James O Keefe a suspended for completely bs reasons, Other accounts have been suspended for nonsensical reasons, but they all tend to flow in one direction. Are we seeing progressive, Bernie supporters getting suspended? I mean it happen, sometimes, but not real are we seeing establishment corporate moderate, what I've been a column Democrats getting suspended, of course, not even after Covington they didn't get suspended and yet

Dorsey image, I gotta had the gall to look me in the eye and say it's just not true TIM and they it's funny because kind of like some one lying to you over and over and over again, and I'm expecting you to be, stupid enough to be alike. It's just fifteen hundred mistakes every single time it happens. It's me. It's just a mistake at a certain point, come on then, like we get it James, O Keefe has had you to videos deleted. I think, actually, I might have the that's the story from bright Bart. Youtube, sensors Project, vartos video, exposing anti Christian, buys Pinterest. They deleted my video to, and in my video I actually pointed out that James O Keefe was biased in a line in his lead. When he exposed Pinterest as banning live action above it was anti media no I'm not saying it was is biased, was a net negative on the story. A story was correct, were absolutely censoring live action. I noticed and

the media. I know what it is: it a left wing, Anti war website and a lot I know a lot of these left wing anti war personalities. They vary and anti democratic establishment tunes we're gonna get along on certain issues. And that was an example of bias. The first thing I considered is James story. True and I checked it out and it seems to be had the evidence and then after few steps down. When I looked into his bias, I noticed here's something he missed and I think you should have included it. I think I think absolutely should have, but the framing from his perspective. In my opinion, is still true and it wasn't in any way taking anything out of context. He was focusing on one issue, so that's where we're biased comes and bought, but anyway, you should consider that for four media is there more to the story right. The pointers I've been censored, he's been censored. Several people have been banned in suspended. Now Facebook says, they're gonna support for expression, we'll see well, they re in, eight people like Laura looming out Jones and in a positive I doubt it

While Europe was, I doubt it. I don't think so. I think there are now having purged the people they need. Depart now they got a will now we're going to change our tune, but after the damage has already been done right. So I guess we'll see what happens as the time goes on, but I think we're gonna be hadn't Dounia. I you the work. Fastest and most fun roller coaster you ve ever been on so had your bats plan for the future, because you might not exist on social media again. If you thought it was bad when they are banning people the past few years way tell your small twitter cat with twenty followers postage like President Trump, and they call or russian, bought and delete you, because I've talked to so many people who have had happened. I have talked to endless people at parties and events that say, add something like seventeen followers and they banned made, and the thing is James. O Keefe is a big fish. He's got Tanaka, worse when they suspend him. We see at we know about it, but think of

how many small channels how many small accounts smaller You know. Individual and social media are banned every day every minute, and you just don't know if you see the big fish going down rest assured there and down substantially more smaller fish, the grass roots efforts and that's why, in my opinion, When you go on right it. What do you see the front pages dominated by left wing? Talking point? That's that often make very little sense or on our meeting. Kinds of information, you gotta our slash politics, but which has five million. You know subscribers threaded channel and they post activist websites and then go to the Donald and their quarantined because that bit they accuse them of threatening police. Tell me that doesn't sound in saying when you hear that conservative trump supporters were threatening police, so

It decided to shut to quarantine that the threat it channel yeah. That sounds like something you made up, because those are the people who way the blue light matter flags, so yeah baby is be a whole lot of fun. We will all end up sitting in our basements with no social media access and all the influences are gone and all that's left is brooded judge, because apparently there cheat and when will see what happens Stick around the neck segments coming up at four p m. You tube dot com slashed him cast. It is a different channel and boy is this I'm gonna, be a doozy Kay, ass after the state of the union, the impeachment trials common, I hope, you're ready for this. While rye that is twenty twenty, I will see you all in an excitement. Thanks rang out. With all the news about the state of the union and the economy, tromp successes, I was wondering the media. Undemocratic establishment didn't have trump derangement syndrome would trump actually be

one of the most popular president's in. U S, history. We have this pole Washington examiner asylum is, I believe, a sum gallop that says record economic optimism under Trump better than again Clinton and Obama. So why is it that, with this roaring economy? this tremendous success. With the new trade deal with this economic optimism, trumps approval, writing isn't higher, not mentally tribes are providing based on guy, the data is actually higher than Obama's for the same time period. So I mean that says something, but I do think. While there I was absolutely worthy of criticism and you don't have to agree with this. See, plans, I think, is absolutely held down I a lying press at not an anomaly, They were. I think all of the press is always like I'm saying their people and media who lie and they play the game for the trouble, but I want to show you something right here we can see that As I mentioned Reagan Clinton Obama trumpets doing better, but the story impeachment get set

These seven times more tv time, then trumps economic successes. Could that be why trumps approval writing has been as low as it is. I mean, even though it is right now relative to Obama a bit higher. Perhaps because as most of us know the media's lying about it or they're, not talking about it. It's a lie by omission or their bias is in what they are talking about. All they do is talk about impeachment, which he's gonna get acquitted its complete nonsense, but what matters? The american people isn't being talked about a single over this story. They save economic optimism has reached a forty four year, high and economic gloom, a record low under President Trump in the lake. Survey that shows people are cheering their best personal enemy in decades. For the first time in its history, the gallop mood The nation economic survey found that fifty nine percent of people believe that they are better off a trend that is sword under tromp? I have to admit, I certainly am the

eyes that are helping me put together. You know that they like concrete. May I put that go to my a gram instant at its edge insarov such to guess you'll, see their point. Concrete our stock and some of these guys in their saint businesses great you know I wanted the furniture store, I the stable, they said, was the best you're of their lives, and I buy agree because To me, as far as I know, and most of all in talking to every once in a really good mood, seems like Trump pulled somethin offer? They say it is higher than President Ronald Reagan made his economy, a campaign rallying cry and better than this. So called tat gum bubble under President Bill Clinton and gallop found at the who feel that they are worse off our down to twenty percent, the lowest ever ever in that means we can talk about the economy being great. And a lot of people certainly think they're better off, but what's important as that Those who are not doing so well still, don't think they're that bad relative to other areas is an insane. Someone might be.

Like the economy is not doing well for me, but I'm not doing their bed. So another Democrats come out and say what economies at working for everyone in a moment People are saying: yeah body in arms, doing better than I'm still doing. Ok sought as bad as it used to. Or the gloom is just the lowest its ever been me. That's amazing, and this is our are. The positive survey comes a day after gallop reported that tromp had reached his highest job approval as president. I gotta stop right here and say something. You know someone once asked me: why is it that you don't like tromp but often make all of these videos defending Trump, and that to me was interesting comment because it sounded just like the same framing that the left says TIM claims out like trauma, but then makes the videos videos defending him. Ah, this is data, as I always say you don't have to like him too nice things are working and we can all you about foreign policy and that's my biggest criticism- and I can talk about General-

public and policy which I'm a fairly muttered individual, but like the easiest. His rival have going through a big list of always policy. Ideas is up our approach, choice and stuff like that like the old school, Democrat republican arguments that we used to have learnt any more seriously, it's happening, I say I'd. Like a moderate Democrat who wants he's Annabelle limits on you know like pregnancy termination type issues. That's that's a big one. Is the easiest go to for me right because it's a classic issue that that that create a stark divide between what used to be the left and right? But right now now, when I talked to conservatives there actually like yeah, you know third trimester that kind of stuff, so big agreement now- and I think I know why. Admittedly, with what happened the other day, you know with Nancy Policy, and I talk about a million times now and Donald Trump State of the union I think we ve already started seeing as a cover to my main channel Democrats quitting the party they they don't want to Emma ever again, I certainly agree I mean for me

more so the cheating right, the cheating with with, in Bergen, whatever is going on with Buddha judge I'll cover than the next segment, but yeah trump doing better and better. The country is doing better and better. There really is a certain point where, just because tromp is an awful character who does really bad things, you can't deny it because what's the her native, and so I will say this, you know typically my approval running of the press really has tracked very closely to the real, clear politics average. I woods I would say you know over the past several day, like the pass. You know several weeks or months instantly relic of forty three to forty. Four right is at a point where I'm like really gonna want to vote for my brother, but for somebody else and I dont vote based. You know thinking someone else's worse or better. I vote if I think I want to endorse this so right now at forty nine in gallop and Rico pot, rip real, clear politics has

I'm just shy of forty five percent and this kind of where I am like that, like forty five percent of what from those I'm approach and agree with actual noted the back, I think a lot of forty does. I am in agreement with, but I do think that the presidency is a bit more specific in its requirements of then just being able to do the job. It really is a nuanced. You no problem, and I also also thinks it think it comes down to you know I'm kind of trying to hold out that there is some kind of hope for what they are Rats can offer in the end. But we're really worries me is that, where I am political recognising the economic boom, the successes of tromp, how people are feeling better? Even democrats are feeling more optimism. Never, even though I can recognise all that there is theirs, concern. I have that if all of the people in a similar political space to me, which has just slightly centre, left concede and say we have to vote for this. It's all!

have. Then we really do lose a very important piece of what makes his country great. As the saying goes, you need two strong wings to fly if the left wing is being damaged and torn apart, there need to be some people who are willing to stand up and say you know, em and remain steadfast and whether it's the ashes crumbling of the Democratic Party and then something new emerging. I don't think it's safe to just walk away, because then it just the eagles. Walls. So I know a lot of people are willing to concede on political points. They don't necessarily agree with, because Trump really is the better option at this point, considering what's going on the Democratic Party in the Caucasus, whatever that nonsense, as I have a concern, and that if too many moderate individuals just concede, then you have a dramatic imbalance in the force. If did you not to say it lightly, if there isn't a decent balance and some real pushed back because we're not getting it from

rats like it may be too late already, then we're gonna see the rise of this fringe. Deranged laughed running around doing crazy things. That's gonna be really scary and dangerous. Blessed. Let's move on the point of trying to make us. Let me just put simply It is becoming harder and harder every day to argue against voting for the president for one simple reason, while Trump touts his factories and we see it in the polls and we see it in our pocket books at a certain point. The Democrats have stopped arguing and so While I can certainly say trumps got a bad character and I think that's very import for the presidency. Trumps foreign policy he is starting to clear up relative to wear. Obama was not trumps, not saint he's on command, none of these things are very, very concerned about, and it's a bit of what I just it's. Why dont vote but of the Democrats can't mount a real reason? What s happening is people watch the state of the union? They hear all of these sweet nothing's from Donald Trump, and I say I'd like to hear an argument against this. It's gone. There's none impeachment! No evidence here

big it and I'm sorry he's got rising support from the black community. I just don't see it's. You ve lost the argument, the only real things like trumps kind of a gross character, but I think it's fair to point out how the media, smearing em and I kind of field this next term for Trump, assuming you winds, and I think we are assuming you whence his populaires gonna spike dramatically. I mean you, ve got a lot of people start a recognised just how good things really are and no matter what his character is. I mean look at a lotta people vote that anyway, so I think I think it's fair point out. For me at least my approval writing typically floats around. And you know where the r c p averages, but I tell you I took a serious hit to that got the other day with Nancy Policy with the state of the union with impeachment. I tell you this man

I'm hearing people say they want to vote for Trump simply because of how insane the Democrats have have been in treating him and I'm like. For me. That's not good enough. You know Trump would really have to be a person that I wanted to stand behind and unfortunately he's not, but I do think it's fair to say at this point you cannot deny he is done a tremendous job and succeeded. Had he needed to succeed. Now. Here's the problem, the well. I think I think I'm gonna hit the nail on the head already, I'm not gonna eat too much. I do try to be short, but if the me the only ever talks about impeachment. It's probably the main reason why people have negative opinions of him into such an extreme debris like for the most part, I'm ambivalent. I think trumps. Funny I really do is a funny guys up deprecating often- and I think, because you don't hear about what is what he's doing for this country. The assumption is, he's just playing golf and he hates everybody needs stealing money. But when you actually

attention. You're, like is not due to bad job, he's just not my choice and that's the big difference, but I think for people like me and my friends, man? You know I'll I'll. Tell you this. I really do think some of my friends are gonna vote for Trump. I really really do out. Ok, what's the big deal, because a lot of people are gonna say also what him none and listen man? Ok, I grew up with skateboarding lefties you know and Arco type people and now they're saying, but all the stuff trot just told us to say to the union was awesome like that. Sounds really great, and the Democrats never came back with a rebuttal changes, rip the speech up and walked, and so it's kind of like did you just concede. Is that what that was? Did you just drop your gloves and walk out of the ring and now my friends are kind of. Like I don't know, I don't see what the problem is. There. We go trumps, gonna, win the media. Narrative is kind of crumbling, because the Democrats haven't mounted a legitimate criticism of the president, and, as I mentioned in my main channel earlier with it,

Are we doing really really well and all this shenanigans? The Democrats have given Trump as best we cover. But will see what happens coming election time. I out you this, as I said last time to I'm not vote in the primaries. On my vote. For the Democrats, it doesn't mean I'm Vodafone Republicans, but I'll tell you Where I met, I got a couple more segments coming up in a few minutes, and I will see you all shortly. How many times have we had to hear from Democrats complaining about the electoral College, saying that the will of the people is the popular vote? Not your colleague Jacques Yet it does it work, and why should people in Wyoming get more vote power than someone in California, Hiram FI say no matter many times? We told them why this is because we're republic not a direct democracy, they don't seem to care, and people like those with Warner have come. Pained on removing the electoral college one hour Something interesting is happening in Iowa. We are at the time

Some this video only looking at around seventy one point: four percent of the votes being tallied, guess who's winning PETE Buddha judge. Yes, wait. You probably heard this, but who has seen that coming I mean there's been a big kerfuffle kerfuffle whatever. What's the kerfuffle carefully I don't know whatever the word has been a weird conundrum problem having to do with the caucus results. People think there's cheating going on there call on Buddha, judge, mayor, cheats, cozy and out paid money for this up. I will hold on ignore that the real issue is the results. Pete Buddha judge has more delegates pledged Van Bernie Sanders, Bernie Sanders has the popular vote. Now I think it's fair say a Yossi as RAG and electoral college and she she supports Bernie Sanders. So I think be safe to say, shall come out and say the popular vote in the primary is who should get it? But what about the rest? The Democrats who cried

in screaming the whole time saying trumped shouldn't have one: it should have been Hilary issue and the popular vote which you voted for booted, judge, jury, saying good judge should lose no, no, no, no wait. Get it. I want to do that now, because their person is winning right, come on obvious? They only come but the electoral college when they lose the electoral college. I know that progressives complaining about that the system, because an end they do believe in the popular vote, respect to them maintaining their integrity on that issue, it's the democratic, stabbed instrument that will play the game and then spend around as fast as they can the moment it hurts them. So we have. The store clad CDC, why does Buddha judge a lead and early Iowa Caucus results if Sanders has more votes their Bernie Sanders Vermont leads in the popular vote. Tell you as the our democratic caucus results trickle end for the twenty twenty presidential race. The New York Times analysis, work is data shows. So how is it possible that Peat Buddha judge former mayor of South Band Indiana is

The lead in the result that matters most for Monday's contest. It all comes down to something called State Delegate: Equivalence with seventy one percent of precincts reporting midday Wednesday Buddha Judge had enough four hundred and nineteen state delicate equivalence to Santa three hundred ninety four. According to the eye, would Democratic Party next Those early results with Senator Elizabeth Warrant of Massachusetts with roughly two and eighty seven state delicate equivalence. They gone. The Washington Post reported Tuesday when six. Two percent of votes were counted that Buddha judged tentative and the state. Delicate equivalence is most likely result of him fairing better than centres in rural areas. We there are more delegate's per caucus. Scour sounds like the other. Zero college. Doesn't it boy boy when those moderate democrat establishment types need the electric car on their site, certainly works out for them. Ok, we're on fragment the auto college, we're talking there caucus system which

much looks similar down. The actual college does work. Do you think people just gonna come out and say I can see the Sanders because he got more votes now I'll, never happen. The same thing will happen if Hillary Clinton, ass, the popular vote, but one electoral college she'd say that's the game you play. Every one will say it all the time I don't care what Party Erin, ever advantages someone gets their justified and taken that they say that I'm on my son, promote anyone. Remember twenty sixteen presidential election the Clinton one millions more votes across the? U S. Overall, the present Trump one, a substantial majority in electoral college votes which determine the actual winner, This is possible because of how state delicate equivalence are distributed and BC. Political correspondent, Steve Corn, you set on twitter of booty judges leader. Basically, rural Areas tend to get more bang for their book at the expense of college heavy areas. And why should it be that a dense pop

nation area would just dictate what the rural areas get to do. I hate to say it, but it does make sense. It's the same exact thing Buddha Judge appeals to more people, indifferent communities- that's important in my opinion, think this way. If you have sweet of rural areas, the people on one side of the state not necessarily agree with people on the other side of the state. They probably agree a lot of things like most Americans do, but there in different areas one might be farm territory, one might be oil country and they have different focuses many, the farmers might have concerns about pollution. While the oil people have concerned on how the regulation on on certain environmental issues impact their business, so they might disagree and if Buddha Judge or anyone running for office appeals to a wider base, its actually safe over the country than key hot pocket areas of like

You know a specific ideology dominating entire conversation, because you might have a big faction of people who are socialists and if you, if you only two delicate by you, know popular vote or vote but orgies. No general action by popular vote. You'd get an overwhelming group of people of one ideology, dictating the conversation and then everyone from different areas who aren't being catered to our talks. You're gonna get angry and fighting could break out. Clashes could break out. People are gonna, get upset their not being listened to. So, if you look at it who can appeal to a wide base and more people than just one community, I think you're better off, so it does makes sense as a state delegate, equivalent projections matter, because that's the number that Cates. How many? I would delegates democratic convention in a walkie will support each candidate, the I wouldn't party define state, delicate equivalence or, as the EU, as the projected number of State Party Convention delegate's the candidates,

receive based upon results of the pressing Caucasus Nazi you some important minor standing. It's a private process, not a guy a process, so cheating yeah, they can do it the I just wanted to review the security on the app they use and they rejected it. No, we don't want that. That's right outside a mouse too, even though Bernie Sanders is losing indelicate count. It may have to do with well out of the way, twenty five to twenty five delegates he's down by there are some coin tosses that are kind well suspicious, to say the least, some viral videos showing people doing coin tosses between booted judge and burning, and then it I'll just leave it there. You are, the video in your confused as to how they actually called it. When the guy catches, the coin and looks at inflicts around what the coin before calling it seems not to make total sense. But here's what happens if you have to burn people and to Buddha judge people and someone for the coin and then lies and gives it the Buddha judge the Bernie people can see

yet and say: hey you're, cheating and the beauty of the binding people can say here cheated. I'm sorry, Bernie people can say your cheating, but the Buddha Judge, people, blackness, archer and then a fight Naga physical fight. But, like all as an argument. So they look coins they round up and down, and there are many areas where Bernie Sanders. One like there was one famous one, you got a hundred one delegates debilitated, sixty six and they the same delegate count so check this out. Wall Street Journal has Sanders technically in the lead, because their basic on vote, percentage, Bernie has twenty six two percent Buddha Judge has twenty five point, two percent, but who did judge has way more delegates, which means when it comes to before the vote that nomination process. Boded judges got this one, but I will went out some of the more interesting conspiracy theories. I guess the funny one being their trickling out the results one posted on twitter that yesterday they had come. You're all of these these votes, but for some reason warrant releasing the data now

can't tell you why, but I can tell you what many Bernie fans think by slowly trickling out results that keep booted in the lead. He does victory lap after victory lap after victory lap and as the cycle of psychology data shows. People are more willing to vote for someone who is winning people want to be in the winning team, so them we reject gets through those victory lapse, as they claim he's an elite he's gone around saying. It's me I one yes maybe a few days or weaker whenever they finally released the data Bernie Sanders will squeak just ahead. But at that point, what new sure, is already over. Some of these key caucus states have already passed a primary states of our past, and Buddha judge used that media cycle to advantage not just that, but with with booty judge in the lead, I'm sure he's getting a tonne, of press requests so even have CNN, you can have MSNBC after all, these other outlets being like he's these in the lead for now, let's get him on tv

ask what what's goin on you're the leader here: the front where that is not yet what do you think and all of that press access will boost Buddha judge in the next elections? I think they eat, I dont know what's happening here. Nor do I want a plaintive conspiratorial games with indian seats the rules for Bloomberg because they cheat, I cheat and twenty six they'll cheat again and they want you to know they cheat so that you give up hope. I'm not a fan of Bernie Sanders, not offend a warrant binds and fourth place. I'm a fan of democracy, democratic detentions and I think of the people want Bernie Sanders. They have every right to have Bernie Sanders, be their nominee and a plague thirty games. I mean you count me out. That's what I said I'm set over over again on the plains game anymore: I'm not gonna go to their primaries. I'm not gonna, give him a vote of confidence

but I will absolutely defend Sanders voters if they're getting cheated as much that I like the guy. I said the same thing for Trump, but you have a right to vote for my respect to understand for the most for why you're doing it as the ways country works. If the people choose Bernie, that's what happens so all the popular vote for burning the delegate, countess, Foreboded, judge, admittedly not completely opposed to the how they do that system. As I explained, what I am opposed to is the weird goings on that seem to benefit the establishment, the entire time or the millionaires. Yet the game is rigged. They want you to think it's rigged and you know what it'll be read next time. Maybe this is the end. Maybe it's their last ditch effort, maybe Bernie will pull it had. The poles are showing it may be, who finally get in and push out the cronies. I don't know, but only the Ali that their stick around. I got one more segment coming up in a few minutes and I will see you all shortly. Elizabeth Warren spotted getting off a private jet in Iowa, as troops,

porters accuse her of trying to hide behind a staffer when she realises she's being filmed and let me just say boy: does it look like Elizabeth WAR and is trying to hide from the camera because she was spotted getting off a private jet yeah man, you don't have to to fly privates so expert so it's a waste of energy but of course, they're going to do it because they don't really care The environment? I have three words for Elizabeth Warren: how dare you how dare you go around claiming to care about the environment preach to all of them? people of the world to reduce we're consumption and you maximize your consumption and a quest for personal power. Make a statement fly first class on. First class is still awesome right. Ah

you don't want to wait in line. You wanna, take your car through the gates and go to your private jet. It's just so much faster, isn't it so? What about what you're? We were worried about? What you're talking about? What about your preaching? You think we're supposed to believe you're being honest malleson. Maybe she really wasn't trying hide behind people, because the camera spotted her, but she still in the private jets. They all do this man all Celebrities go round braggin like all. We gotta do better for the world, but not me rules for thee, but not for me see. While I want you, to reduce, reuse and recycle. Personally I got eight hundred K. Cops are gonna private jet we're not back to limos in front? In fact not just a limo we're gonna limo for my dog, behind it, ok, exaggerating but less read the story. The daily mail reports, Senator Elizabeth worn was spotted getting off a private plain ahead of the eye of a cautious with tromp supporters, accusing her of trying to hide when she realized it was being felt and, thanks to you what's the Democrats

presidential candidate touchdown, in deploying on Monday on the private out of the Caucasus footage obtained by Fox NEWS, showed the seventeen year old, stepping off the plane with several campaign staffers. We they include the sweet from parts of Watson, Elizabeth Warren, Life on earth is at risk because of co2 emissions, but not at risk enough for me to go. The convenience of flying on this private jet. Then hiding behind a staffer went on caught. The mask You set senator could be seen thanking a member of the ground staff before making her way towards the airport building. She was filmed following folly, closely behind to female staffers, several trump supporters quickly see started. Quickly started sharing the footage on Twitter, as they accused warn of trying to her behind the staffer when she spoke the camera, some pointed to her, being a green new deal advocate and claims it was being hypocritical by flying on a private jet. Yes, she is now? It is entirely possible that she was just

standing in a walkie behind the staffer, but at it really does seem because, ok at first when she gets off the plane, they're all war hang together kind of side by side and you can see her and then she looks up and look straight at the camera and then all of a sudden, looks down and turns and then begins walking perfectly behind therefore you can't see her. You can only see a little bit of her behind like it really feels like that makes it so much worse. She should have just waved and bill. I pay as you go in and have explained. You know, listen with to make sacrifices and should have given some some hypocritical speech about. Best thing we can do is win and we have to use the resources available to win, and you know it. You know what will do our best to reduce things, but we're up against Donald Trump and gotta understand sugar set any of that now she didn't she just ducks down. So there's that some photos of it, here we have a warrant. Is a tweet former that says trumps. First, H, H, secretaries doesn't repaid taxpayers for the private jets he took while flying to rip

health care from millions by repealing the icy. But it's ok, though it states donors to warrants campaign or paying for a private planes about that. Hey Senator Warren. Why you? trying to hide behind your staffer every just got off at gas guzzling private, plain guess: climate changes a hoax, a bit hyperbolic, I might add, Charlie Kirk's here's green new deal advocate Elsbeth warranty boarding her private jet when she really real when she releases shoot when she realizes is being felt she tries hiding behind or staffer she spent seven hundred and twenty thousand five hundred thousand private jets last quarter walk Oh that's not now. Look I get the general idea of why they do it. They claim that basically, they secure

Issues because having to go through the airport is assuming another's tons of people everywhere and then have security with them as potential nominees. So it's easier to take a private private plain, but it's still listen. What's what's more important, your time or the world, what message are you sending? If you claim people need to cut back and then you won't, because you think you deserve that position, yachts called a rock and a hard place. It's hard for us find a solution. Shall we have people like Donald Trump, not only being proud of his private planes, but Trump literally has a jumbo jet pull up behind him. When he's doing as rallies he's the opposite of them. I get people at times thanked him. Why don't you call up Trump for flying in a private jet? Excuse me, excuse me Donald Trump isn't flying a private jet technically, it is like a seven. Fifty seven very different from the colloquial understand- I want to private jet is the pointed. Yes, it has its own Donald Trump. Like seven, it's a seven. Fifty seven hours and forty seven things affords

Judge I've been was rallies and they part the plane behind the hangar and, unlike the dunes, gotta giant plain behind him, Trump embraces it and rags about it and cuts regulation. And it's one of the reasons. I am not a supporter of his because I dont, like those things I'd like warned us that flying private planes to I'll. Tell you what I understand that truck comes out and says, I do not love it at stopping hypocritical his racing his ideology. Unease is is in line with what is telling people War and, on the other hand, is doing the exact opposite, and so people like lunar to capture an Al Gore. Why should believe any of them. I believe Trump he says he doesn't? He doesn't. You know is not as concerned when we deregulate you know the oil industry or when he flies around on his own private jumbo jet, I'm like yet that sound, tromp he's a billion answer is gonna. Do a lot of people like it. If you're, somebody who doesn't doesn't believe that man made climate change or

that man is creating or causing a massive problem, or that it will be a great catastrophe. Why would you care trumps banana with you the whole time he says you didn't care, he says it's a hoax and gives it a bit plain and flies around, that sounds like success personally, I disagree that climate change is a big problem. I think we should take it seriously. I dont think lying to people or tricking them is. That is the way to solve these problems. I dont think screaming how dare in people's faces a way to solve the problem, and especially don't hide when you get caught flying in a private jet, so on this is a much more tweets, I'm going to read it here, I'll read: two more is present, said Elizabeth WAR the board's private plan in Iowa them. Parties when she looks up notices the camera then ducks her head and hides behind a staffer as they can to you know, walk they already caught you Warren, stop. This person says the best path it is after she realizes she's common camera exiting a private jet. She attempts to hide and are staffer. Well I'll. Tell you what

Everyone seems to know that these world leaders are complete. Total hypocrites, like this story from the guardian from today, when, how Mr Climate hypocrisy, Canada's leaders have reached a new low on you, gotta love Gratitude Burg, cozy, and up to these hypocritical world leaders taken these portfolio but then yelling at every one else. She has no idea what you're talking about. I feel kind of bad for her ass. She sits there yelling. How dare you stole my childhood, but then take smiley pictures with just in Trudeau, and they say eight a toward that as point five percent of the earth's earth's population that plan to use up. Nearly a third of the planet's remaining carbon budget. Excellent photo opportunity. Gretta Listen, you need to be standing next to just in our employees sitting next to just in Trudeau. The store from a guardian reads: Americans, elected Donald Trump, who insisted climate change was a hoax. So it's no surprise since taking office. He's been all in for the fossil fuel industry. There's no sense despairing. The energy is better

spent fighting to remove him from office, so they say: Canada? On the other hand, elected a government that believes the climate crisis is real and dangerous and with good reason, considerations, arctic territory. Give it a front row seat the fastest woman on earth. Yet the countries leader seem likely in the next few years to approve a vast new, tar sands mine, which will pour carbon and the atmosphere through the twenty sixties? They know yet they and bring themselves to act on the knowledge. Now that is cause for despair. Thank you. The people! who elected Donald Trump, no all did a hoax. I'm sorry. I have a disagreement with that, but it's not hypocrisy it's actually standing by your your thoughts, what you believe, but how is Canada Gonna come out house no gonna sit with Gretta and their literally gonna build this tar sands mine. The story says the Tec. Mine would be the biggest our sands mind. Yet a hundred thirty square miles of petroleum mining located. Just six

seen miles from the border of Wood Buffalo National Park. A federal panel approve the mine, despite conceding that it would likely. Harmful to the environment and to the land culture of indigenous people all while so now you ve not here, had all the intersection of points Your literally going after marginalized groups are destroying the environment and you don't care man talk about hypocrisy, Yes and I'm alright, the shopkeeper short how we're gonna rag on people and then find a private jet. How are you gonna rag on people and scream? How dare you, but then you have this village. These people, you take photo ops, knowing or both leaving their destroying the planet and just doing it anyway. If you really thought the planet was falling apart, you'd stop, wouldn't you So why should anyone believe you I don't? leave any of these people. I think Gretta believes it. I think she's been fed a bunch of crazy nonsense. Now there wasn't gonna end an eight ten or twelve years. And yes, we can we not fossil fuels in a couple decades. It's not a big deal there. Are

the issues will deal with them. Human survive new technology will emerge because necessity is the mother invention. I have faith, but I think she really believes it. Trudeau is other governments, they dont believe they're lying. That's why they're carrying on as other waters and ending its why their buying ocean front properties? Why would they do that together? Investing in Miami Beach condos of all the places, the buy property? Why do their. If you're really thought the city would be underwater, you wouldn't buy the property, would you so? No there? They say that they don't believe this their hypocrites and while it may be. We have serious issues because the scientific community is saying, hey, we're gonna, do these things, they just don't care. You know why, because these are the people who just want the keys to the castle. Their attitude, as you know what it's good for me. Who cares what anybody else and they pretend like they care? Well, I hope as with worn, enjoys a