A few days ago in Boston, there was an event called the straight pride parade. The event was basically one big troll and it was people who were conservative or just a troll who showed up to be silly. Some people dressed like clowns, Miley Annapolis, was the grand Marshall he's a game end. The whole thing was meant to probably, in my opinion, get a rise out of the several anti fascist organizations, organized protests. Many people associate with the far left. They ended up into clashes with the police, I'm not going to play the game of who did what, but several police were injured and believe there were about thirty six arrests. In my opinion, the people who shut up to protest a troll March are not.

I don't know where they're getting turned their information, but they genuinely believe they were going after fascists. Yes, the man dressed up like a clown, the true fascist. I think they were intentionally trying to be absurd, but whatever they did anti for showed up, and there were many many arrests. I talked about the prospect of a civil war. I don't know what will happen, but I have to say it feels that this is the end result of what's going to happen. Take a look at the story, Alexandria, because your quartets promotes fundraiser for Boston protesters associated with anti fun. Let's be real, they are anti five. Okay, it anti fall is not like a club with a membership card right, it's just an ideology. It's a far left militant ideology now receiving support from far left Democrats that are actually in Kong, not just AOC, but Ayanna Presley. So yes, it's the far

Democrats, unsurprisingly supporting people who are out of their minds. I've never seen a. I don't know of any situations where american citizens protesting their neighbors. I mean, maybe I'm just wrong. Maybe you can give me an example, but at least in my life most of what I have from the left was protesting against the government, others showing up to protest a guy just like a clown or a middle aged guy, carrying a Trump flag. I don't really understand if somebody wants to march around and be silly who cares, but they did and they did get violent and people did get hurt and now their fundraising on their behalf and calling the people at the straight pride rally White straight. I believe this shows that we may be rolling downhill, with no way to go back up, there's no way to stop the flood it's coming. This is how insane things are that you have high profile politicians with what do you have like five mil

followers saying there white supremacists, it was a guy was wearing a clown suit. Dude, I don't know what you think is happening, but we don't see the world the same anymore and there's nothing. We can do to stop it. I want to talk about what's going on with straight pride rally an AOC, but I also want to get into what's happening with Trump and the fracturing of media and this breaking of reality. I believe the left lives in its own parallel universe now because they are unwilling to actually do the research. So, let's get started with this story before we do head over to TIM, ask dot com, slash, donate if you'd like to support my work as a Paypal option, a crypto option, a physical lad, but the best thing you can do is share this video Youtube D ranks independent political commentary, so you know that they're, propping up CNN Msnbc Fox NEWS. If you think I do a good job share, this video on any platform really does help. But let's read daily caller reports. New York, Rep AOC promoted

a fundraiser for bail money for a group of counter protesters that included Antifa members after after a straight pride parade in Boston, Massachusetts quote: well, just read a tweet right here. One way to support the local lb, LGBT community impacted by Boston's White Supremacists parade. I can't tribute to the bail fund for the activists who put themselves on the fire line on the line protecting the Boston community, honey money. Leftover goes to Massachusetts, bail fund and there's also the tweet for minor Presley join me right now, I'm making a contribution. Thank you, the allies and accomplices who stood in the gap and laid their bodies on the line today in in a in a front LGBT hate March to everyone feeling on scene and volatile. Today we got you equitable outrage. Our destinies and freedoms are tied. Here's the point, at least it live the way. I see the straight pride thing. They want to prove that simply minding their own business would be offensive and get a rise. You might say

why does someone need a straight pride parade? That's actually a good point and the reality is they don't? They know, however, by simply minding their own business and being proud of themselves, the left will come and protest the same thing as those signs. That said it's okay to be white. They know that by simply being tepid, not supremacy, just literally saying, hey, it's okay, it's fine! They would get a rise out of the left they're trying to expose hypocrisy on the left there trying to troll them, and it works check this out. They say indeed, arrests did occur. Thirty six individuals were arrested Saturday with numerous charges of and battery on, a police officer and one you were not arrested for assault and battery by means of a dangerous weapon accord to the Boston Herald. I say reports from USA today and they're old indicate that many counter protesters identified with Anti fought a far left group that embraces violence to achieve political goals, one member of anti but told the Herald quote we're covered in black. So when we attack these guy

guys, we can't be prosecuted, they are fascists, one hundred percent. How else are you going to get them to shut up from what wearing clown costumes? I can do not. There was a guy just like a clown walking around as a clown, and many of these people do this. You know why it's intentionally embarrassing to the outside, think about it, the they they know they look absurd and they want that to be the case. They want anti for to shop and pro best clowns, and they are, they really are, is a mean right. The clown world mean, but when these people show up like clowns, the left goes. Oh my god. How embarrassing for these people that's the point. They want to look absurd and silly and embarrassing so that when people you know in black, clad outfits show up with crowbars and weapons. They look insane here the ramifications we see this story from the from the Boston Herald CALL Auntie for what they are

domestic terrorists. Well, I'm not going to read through the story from the first the day after the event, I'm not gonna read through this. They do much in the thirty six arrests and four police were injured. I'm gonna show you this from twenty seventeen. They already do that. The the the the I homeland security already refer to what they do, as as domestic terrorists, as a conference about commenced, call the anarchists that seek to counter white supremacists domestic terrorist. Well, let me let me explain something to you. Okay,. People doesn't like clowns are not fascists there, literally just walking around minding their own business anti, for is the authoritarian. You know scourge, but doesn't matter look I I've talked about anti fun many occasions they are out of their minds. We'll get to that point, and and why, but I want to stress what really matters is that people on the left and the right don't see the world the same way anymore. All it's actually moderates and conservatives who are united

and then the left, which is gone off the rails, and I believe this is partly due to media and boy. Do I have a really really great example, showing it's a it's. It's also ironic. You know I love using fire trucks on fire. As a good analogy for irony. You know fire trucks would put out fires when it burst into flames. It's funny in the hypothetical. Not if I was literally happening, I'd be shocked, but I have an article from Axios that talks about trump allies. Trying do you know, accused the media of lying story literally gets it wrong. It's a story that manipulate or lies about, what's actually happening and then claims it's Trump was trying to do it and I have the data to actually back it up. Well, let's go back to this story. They say call ugliness an violence. What is mob rule has no place on Boston streets. This is from the Boston, Herald editorial

staff. It's an editorial statement from the newspaper itself, there's a reason why I'm not going to read under Anna Cohens no disrespect, but this is our personal opinion which the Boston Herald is published. Well, we already know that Antifa is described as domestic terrorists. There's no classification system for making a group, a hate group or Harris Group doesn't exist so to all the people saying we must label anti fuzz terrorists that doesn't happen. It doesn't work that way. But here we have the Boston, help themselves, pointing out that these people, who showed up and gay, bring in large scale, intimidation and thuggery it was the left. It was extreme LE lists Bowling, harassed. Anyone they deem divergent from their group think they spit and punched and yelled hateful things, law enforcement and by Saturday night there were thirty six arrests, four injured officers. According to Boston, police, nine people face charges,

Sultan battery on police officers, our elected leaders need to call out and he fought for what they are. A hate group not listen like. I said, there's no classification for that, but here's what's alarming the Boston Herald can can point out exactly what this was. Who cares if these weird I was one of March around like clowns, they're doing it on purpose, but they're allowed to and they're not violent and not hurting anybody when Antifa shows up and claims they're fighting against fascists and far left Democrats in the house support them. I got to say: that's really alarming. Aoc doesn't seem to know what she's talking about half the time she has gaffe after gaffe. She lies. She turns her gaps into policy positions. She does she once claimed at twenty one trillion dollar accounting error like not real money could pay for more than half of universal healthcare. She then, she then claimed that billions of dollars in tax breaks

was the city of New York giving money to Amazon. She doesn't know what she's talking about and she's rallying a base that is clueless as to really happening because they don't read the news, she's rallying them to give money to groups that have been called a domestic terrorist by federal law enforcement. I just don't understand it. Here's happening okay, there is a fracture in the media lance and- and this is what we're seeing we're seeing a left and people like aoc- that don't do research, they're, essentially playing a game of telephone with themselves and believing this fictional reality. That's why moderates and conservatives tend to be united, moderates and conservatives actually look at the source material. Take a look at this story: Trump allies plot new war on social media- this is sort of in along with the New York Times. Did those that are familiar? The New York Times claimed that Trump allies were trying to target them over social media.

Interestingly, the latest update from Axios is that since the New York Times smeared, this loose group of Trump supporters, they've actually used the press to start fundraising, but we'll come back to this in this store they claim Trump and his allies are lying about social media bias to attack the press. Okay, I'm not a fan of Trump guy that everybody knows it. I have no problems disparaging things about him and I was on stage an event recently, where I said actually quite enjoying people make fun of the guy. I just want to rangement syndrome like any regular human being who's been involved in politics in this country. You don't like everybody and you can make jokes and insult the politicians. You don't like it's fine, it's how it's always been, certainly their extreme in hyperbolic statements about every President George Bush Obama, whatever I look, Trump is the guy who won and he's going to do his thing. It is what it is. Here's what I realize.

The reason why I don't have Trump derangement syndrome. I check the fax. I read the source material, the people left, who don't think they're actually looking at. You know the worst of the worst that the nightmare return of fascism, so they put on all black and the Going street beat random people. They've gone nuts they've been indoctrinated by a fractured and broken media and they're not really getting the truth. I know it's, it's probably pointless for me to say, because they'll accuse me of doing the same thing. However, I used left wing sources on purpose. Okay, I check all the facts and I use one slash three party meeting Agency NEWS Guard on purpose to check my own personal bias and I have to say if moderates and conservatives are seeing the world in a similar way and according to at least date, I believe, is from from Q. They they say they have a healthier news, diet from left and right sources. I think the left has gone nuts and they're just consuming and producing fake news money. Prove it to you, though, things out, I say

this campaign and key allies planned to make allegations of bias by social media platforms a core part of their twenty twenty strategy. Officials tell Axios well, we've been going actually went to the White House went over this. They say look for this just and sustained attacks on Facebook and twitter in particular. The sources say the irony, the social platforms, credit and staffed, largely by liberals, but often used most effectively in politics by conservatives. The data shows okay, let's assess that situation. That's true, I would say liberal such a progressive, because I'm a liberal, but they are used most effectively by conservatives and the data does show it. The left can't mean that's the joke right. Here's the thing because can service are so effective. It looks like they're being knee capped by the media companies because they don't like that. The left has become humor. Less look at their reaction to Dave Chapelle Comedy Special universal panning among the left, almost universal yeah, yeah they're, not funny and they're ineffective at spreading a message for whatever reason. I don't know why

hers and moderates have had a good time making means so so what these companies do, kneecap slow him down, hurt them, because the left can't figure it out. Let's read on why it matters Trump successfully turned the vast majority of his supporters against traditional media and he to do the same against the social media companies. That's just not true. First of all, this is an op ed. Do they say up at anywhere? Well, they should trump didn't turn people against the media, the media created Trump and if we're gonna play a game of you know to read it. You know finding the root cause and I think that's the the

fair assessment you can make. The media was so sure Hillary Clinton was going to win. She didn't the media. Look look trump didn't create this phenomenon, he's a symptom of whatever is happening. This fracture between the media and the people they claimed. Hillary Clinton had what ninety seven percent chance of winning and then Trump ended up winning. It could just be statistics, but the media couldn't see it. They were shocked, it happened and Trump got elected because whatever was happening was happen before him. Let's read more, they say Republicans. Internal data shows it stirs up the base like few other topics. Maybe it's because people are being banned unfairly. In the same way, we've seen trust and legacy media organizations to tear it over the past year. There are similarities of social media companies. A top republican operative involved in the effort, told me between the lines they say. The charges, overt bias by social media platforms are way overblown several studies have found, but if the exaggerated claims stick it could

the chances of regulatory action by Republicans. Let's just stop right here, I'm gonna give you some basic proof. Everybody knows that Twitter bans Ms Jenn during the fact now most people understand Ben Shapiro, for instance, one of the highest profile conservative pundits in the world, one of the top podcasts. He doesn't agree with that definition of Miss Jen during nor do any of his fans were most of France. They don't believe that you can just change your pronoun okay. That means Twitter has a rule that specifically targets conservatives that the easiest way to explain the bias. Of course, there are many other examples case in point. The Gizmodo story that broke the news that staff at Facebook were biased and we're removing conservative stories from trending or how about the leaked emails from Project VERITAS. You don't kind of like the they frame things, but the emails are legitimate, showing that Google staff were seeking to hinder moderate and can

personalities on Youtube by kneecapping their channels, reducing recommendations and suggestions. It's a it's not over exaggerated, because exaggeration is an opinion. It's literally happening and people get banned every day and they're upset by it. Trump knows this and people have a right to express themselves. This story is trying to claim there's no bias and it's trump who's trying to fracture. You know trust in media, but there literally presenting a biased opinion on what's really happening happening. We can claim it exaggerated or under exaggerate or over jet. Doesn't it it's it's a relevant. There is by spirit. What do you? What not they're? Not you want to claim it's a serious issue or not is an opinion, but it is happening. Let's read more, they say tech execs see the they know. The escalation is coming so they're cranking up outreach to leading

conservatives and trying to push hard on data showing that conservative voices, often outperform liberal ones irrelevant. The performance of a conservative voice has nothing to do with whether or not smaller channels are being deleted or banned or suspended. Just because some conservatives are better at the internet than liberals doesn't mean their rules aren't by yes, the story goes on reality check from Axios Chief Tech in the freedom. What is re is that most of the platforms have policies against bias that some conservative figures have run afoul of and there's your reality check. Okay, I'll accept that you know why, if, if, if you have rules- and it tends to be conservative- that run afoul of those rules, isn't it fair to say that perhaps those rules overwhelmingly target conservatives? Are we done here? They don't see, I understand what bias means. Does it mean the tech

get us are saying we hate conservatives? No, it means they said here. A list of rules can service. Hey. Excuse me. We don't agree with your idea of Miss gender ring too bad. They say and then Bam those people right, that's called bias. It means that the internal world view of the people running these companies is at odds with conservatives with a legal right to speech. It's the story is incredible, but is the main point, because I'm I'm- I don't spend too much time on this. Our nation without share truth, will be hard to impossible to govern it's true and that's one of the reasons we have trump, not Trump didn't create this problem. The media didn't see it coming. That shows

the media has already lost what ever shared for truth with the public. It's it's what the public doesn't trust them there. You go now Brian Stelter, recently around this story, saying why Trump's constant attacks on on an independent press are so dangerous. An independent press, actually quite the opposite. Trump is railing on the corporate mainstream press and it's actually super boarding the independent speakers. So no, in fact, I was invited to the White House summit. It's really funny. I routinely rag on the president and call him boorish and I make fun of his care his character and his behavior on I've. Criticized many of its policies. It's funny, though. I'm not gonna make a million with videos screeching that Orange man is bad because CNN does it for me. I don't need to, and also I don't have Trump derangement syndrome. I don't think it's the end of the world. I just kind of don't like the guy. That's and that's okay. I understand they're conservatives who don't like MIKE

people either and say to him. How could you support someone like Tulsi Gabbert and they say? Oh you're, not you're wrong. Great, totally, respect your opinion, but you don't have you don't see tulsi derangement syndrome, in fact conservatives and to be supporting her because the Dnc is cheating so that the moderates exist and and told his kind? It's it's actually a progressive okay, but the media they they. They want you to be in their cult of orange man, bad or else, and they claim they independent. Sorry I was invited to the White House and I am not a KN ally off the president or or you know his policies, quite the opposite, but I guess the way they see it is if you're not walking in lockstep with Trump derangement syndrome. You must be support

in him. It's mind blowing to me. I can literally be like okay. Well that thing he did was kind of okay, but I don't like that military thing he did and that's considered support seriously. Tepid criticism of the president, like leaning away from they, considered support they're, trying to claim that Trump is creating a problem, but that's the point he's not, but here's the best part they say. Look at this. Some of what trump posts about the media is legitimate criticism, but much of it is misleading at the root of it. All is a lie that legitimate news outlets are fake. When he says journalists routinely make up sources out of thin air, for example, he has no proof of the charge. He either miss our stance on the press, operates or is misleading people on purpose he's been saying it for you and he's been corrected for years. What the so at this point, the latter is more likely there's actually a story about some German didn't. Have it pulled up? Who literally made up news but uh? Let's play a game. Um I've actually pulled up evidence of

news. What you're seeing here is one of my favorite citations, because it's actually but old to the life and death of the Seth rich conspiracy theory by the Washington Post, changelog from website hold news deaths and we can see that it was first archived may twenty two thousand and seventeen, but some for some reason it was changed in November. I wonder why that is well thanks to new steps we can compare with previous. The reality is it's quite complicated, but the story itself is fake. It's fake! The story claimed that Kim dot com. It may have been hacking into the pride that G email account of the set of South Ridge or something to try and call he ate. I try great proof of a conspiracy, but Dave Weigel literally made it all up. He did and then six it's months later he went in and changed it. I'm not gonna to the whole thing, but you know it's there, you can. You can search for the story. You can go to news, some pulled up. You

can see how he changed it from to insinuate that Kim dot com was hacking into this person's account in center just count into it's just you know, you know it's a speculation. The point is: here's a story where they literally framed as though Kim dot com did this several high profile reporters share it. It is fake news and then six months later he changed it. You know why that way. If you go back to the original story, it doesn't you don't see, they were the fake news. So here's what happens when the story goes public. It gets a ton of traffic six months later. He makes the changes and says what happened. I don't know, but the internet is forever and we know, but I got a couple more stories, or at least one more. This is I'll leave on this note. Okay, look. I want to make sure that the main point is is is what you get a straight pride march: a troll people dressed like clowns, clearly not serious, very tongue in cheek and meant to be ridiculous, but these people are seeing show up, show far left extremists who show

up are serious and deranged. Why? Because they're being inundated with fake news completely. Excuse me completely inundated by fake news, but they live in this parallel reality where they think Trump created it. They seem not to have the ability to do it. Research, they don't seem to understand basic policies, they don't seem to actually hear the interviews and they believe they're right and it's scary, fake data, fake research is produced by organizations and it gets published with impunity without fact, checking and now we're all stuck in this world. They claim Trump and his allies are trying to claim that there's a social media bias or there's a bias in the press, Trump didn't create the bias in the press. The bias in the press exists channels like mine exist because we cut through the noise and we call out the b s.

Unfortunately, I have seen many people give you actually are. Example from today I made a video, my second channel about this study, claiming that Youtube feeds people. You know down a radicalization pipeline, it's not true the study, actually just mission mixes and matches channels claiming they hold on ideologies. They don't and even one instance claimed. One person was two people and make no sense. It made no sense, but the data is fake. I made a video pointing it out. Ah far left activists posted on Facebook, and someone told him I was faking. They said no, it's Riel, they posted my video. I refuse to watch it, they said well, there you go, they refuse is to read the news that could break their bubble and it's it's. This bias that humans have where they've invested too much into this reality and they refused to break it. Could you imagine if you worked for years to build something only to find out, you were wrong the whole time your entire life was a lie. Humans refused to acknowledge it,

but the scary thing is: if they want to live in this parallel reality of insanity, they're going to drag us all down with them and that's what we get now AOC is calling for these people to to to other comparable to donate to these lunatics, who show, I think, they're fighting against fascist and they were literally pro testing, like dudes dress up like clowns. That's how insane it is look. I know it's funny, but I have to stress this point. People marched as clowns had no weapons that had no shields and the police said: okay, we're gonna, let you march you're legally allowed to, and these law resist types people with delusions of grandeur are marching around getting into fights with cops and Paul. Petitions in the house are supporting it. We have some kind of growing, don't wanna call it infectious ideology, these p,

we have lost it and there are dangerous. They are very dangerous. I'm not going to get into bigger details 'cause. I know you're going to punish to this channel for talking about it, but it's getting bad what we saw with aggression, facilities, numerous facilities that were attacked, it's getting bad. Well, I think what five now and that's been pushed by people like a c. These people are nuts okay, there, I'm gonna say it one more time, I'm sorry if I'm, if I'm at, but I have to drive his point. Kazuyo Cortez, a Presley, far left Democrats. Are raising money for a group of people who showed up to protest with violence to to get what to riot against people who are dressed like clowns, not all of them, but seriously that's what was happening straight part of it clowns what it? What do you think is happening? They've gone nuts,

go home, crack open, a soda watch, some tv man chill out, but if people can't dress up like clowns and wave little flags and wear red hats anymore, I don't know what to expect next, but you have politicians supporting it so I'll leave it there stick around next time it will be coming up at Youtube: dot com, Slash TIM cast news at six p, dot M thanks for hanging out again and I'll. See you all next time. Suicide rates rise two hundred and sixteen year high across the UK. The stories today also have story from June suicide rates, for you, teens and young adults are the highest on record and by a sharp rise in suicides among older teenage boys. I can't tell you exactly what's going on, I can only give you my thoughts and opinions on why this might be happening by think social media is playing a huge role in this people aren't really interacting anymore. I think that maybe the like a big

issue, but for young man. I think it's also a lack of purpose, a lack of drive, and perhaps men are just more likely to succeed. I've read before that men and women aren't necessarily more likely to try suicide but menus more brutal methods which work more often. I've also read that women try more but use methods that result in them being saved. I don't know, I can't tell you for sure well read the story. What I can say, though, is that in my opinion, we have seen a ridiculous trend of heightened anxiety and fear and panic among so many people and we've also seen a dramatic lack loss of purpose. Young men are virgins until, like you are dead, large amount of them they're not having relationships they're, not doing anything. They're playing video games are living in their parents basement that I finding jobs, they're not going to school with a serious crisis. There's a there's, a cultural crisis outside the culture war. I don't act like it only impacts guys, but I don't know where it goes from here. You know I

don't know what to expect, but I can say when we see stories over and over again about you know Orange man, bad and a woman. The other day saying please stop wearing red hats. It seems like anxiety, is reaching a tipping point and now we're gonna see stories like this. Well, that's right the story and see what's actually going on and I can say the commentary for afterwards, but in the Uk- and I got all other stories I want to highlight: increase large driven by suicides among boys and men, while self inflicted deaths among females under twenty five. All so see a considerable rise reaching highest rate on record for their age group. I just want to make sure I say before we start reading that, if you're feeling, if you're feeling depressed or sad or concerned, you know reach out to somebody, every single person on this planet has a purpose and value, and if you can't find yours or you're feeling things are hopeless, you you can do it trust me when I say

that and you can you can reach out to someone and you can find your drive and I've talked about. How I think Jordan Peterson is a is a great example of this, and we even now see some people on the left as a guardian story. Talking about how he's right, Jordan, Peterson says, find the heaviest thing you can carry and carry it find your purpose. It exists. You can do it even if you just build a little, you know go out to the words and start willing to stick into a little statue. Just do something do something find your passion, the independent reports, the rate of suicide in the UK. It's had a sixteen year high after surging in the past year, following one slash two decade of decline, new figures show data from the office national statistics. When it's revealed, six thousand five hundred and seven suicides were registered last year, marking a twelve percent rise on the previous year and the highest rate since two thousand and two that's insanely high, that's a huge

increased. The rise appears to be largely driven driven by suicides among boys and men, with the male rate, having significantly increased from fifteen dot. Five deaths per one hundred thousand to seventeen went to. There was also rise among girls and women, but this is not judged by the onus to be statistically different to that observed in the previous here. So it would seem like this is exclusively a male phenomenon, and it's so funny. I think one of the contributing factors is that there are people increasingly looking for a community to try and deal with the anxiety, the fear, the depression, they're feeling and all of these communities are attacked and belittled in the mainstream. I have to imagine if you're, a young guy I and you're feeling stressed out depressed because of certain issues you can't overcome in society, and you turn to a group of community of say you know, make tile or something like men's rights, your bill little for it. They make the problem worse. I just saw,

but it called in tears- and I think it's one of the most disgusting and nightmarish things. I've ever seen, you're talking about who have social anxiety disorders. Who do you know sure they may be narcissistic angry, they may be, you know, have really they. They may say really nasty things, but it's because they're suffering and they're angry right. The purpose of this subreddit is to all people who are suffering and sure, maybe they're lashing out. We understand that when people say are they lash out, but there's a sub subreddit. I see it pop up on our slash all. Maybe it isn't with it so far I don't know all I know is it's it's it's it's a separate dedicated the ball leading men who are in pain, yeah. There are people who are not such developing socially well and then what happens is when they try and turn to a community try and find some solace there be little and mocked, and it's okay. The media allows the attack on men

listen. I understand the whole argument about patriarchy and- and you know, feminism and all that stuff, but you have to recognize. Not every single guy has power, they don't seem to get it. There's a bell curve right. There, certainly men on top, but the average woman. The middle is slightly above the average man in the middle and then the belt that the back end of the bell curve for men goes beyond women, meaning in circumstances like women. Judge men too, really really high standard. Like ok, Cupid Data shows this that they gave you almost every guy is below average. Then you have intelligence, have a lot of factors. This is going to create a lot of men who are suffering and incapable. It's also. You know society itself when have a mainstream media that thinks mocking and belittling men is okay. Like the Gillette add

you wonder why this happens? I don't let's, let's, let's, let's talk about you, let that for a second, you look at Gillette's ad for women and what do they do? They show a morbidly obese woman and they say you go you do whatever you want, even though it's toxic and unhealthy, literally it's toxic being morbidly obese is dangerously unhealthy for everybody, man or woman. The point of making them is that Gillette shows this morbidly obese woman and I'm not trying to be disrespectful to the woman herself. I'm just trying to this point and they say good for you and then they that then they made a commercial about toxic masculinity and they say what do you do? Man, your bad, your bad, your bad? Okay, now I have a bunch of young man growing up hearing this women do no wrong man, bad yeah, and then we see a spike among men, they're being it's a culture that thanks it's okay, to tear someone down and if you try and call this out I'll, probably get criticized for simply saying it was real, but

more they say are, however, self inflicted deaths among females under twenty five. So I considerable rice reaching the highest rate on record for their age groups. That's in sting, even though they don't think it's statistically different from last year, still also reaching up the highest on record for the age group. Males continue to account for three orders of suicide deaths in two thousand and eighteen Nick's stripe, head of health analysis and life events at All- and I said we saw a significant increase in the rate deaths registered as suicide last year, which has changed a trend in continuous decline since two thousand and thirteen, while the exact reasons for this are unknown. The stay to show that this is largely driven by an increase among men who have continued to be most at risk of dying by suicide chief exit. But what does that mean? Chief executive of this to me, Samaritans Ruth Sutherland, said the figures were extremely worrying and call for the issue he considered as a serious public health issue, urging that suicide was not inevitable and was a gender and inequality issue. I

every single one of these is a tragedy that devastates families, friends and communities, whilst the over all rise has only been seen this year and we hope it is not the start of a longer term trend. It's crucial to have a better understanding of why there has been such an increase. She added. She also raised concerns. There are no cross departmental. I don't want to get into the nitty gritty of the hospital stuff over the conclusion here. They say: well, you know what let's, let's move on to the next door, because the issue is not just confined to the UK. I did cover the story back in June when it came out suicide rates. For U S. Teens and adults are the highest on record and they say it's driven by a sharp rise in suicides among older teenage boys. According to new research, no passion community, I think that's one of the big issues, but I also

thank you know I was reading something about power dynamics. I don't know if this is true or not, it was kind of just someone's comment on a reddit thread and they said the male male power fantasy, like we see in movies, is to be the hero who saves. Everyone is to protect everyone and the female power fantasy is to live in luxury and have everyone love you? And so, when you look at like the rom coms, you know overseas, like the action movies, you can see what truly trip hop plays into that you know whatever you wanna call cultural, otherwise, but I do believe man need something to do it's. Why a man have hobbies? That's why you know men are more likely to do certain things was then women? Now you can call it a cultural or societal, whatever that's fine, but in my opinion, I'm not surprised that with everything we've seen in the culture war outside of just you know, young men not going to school and not getting jobs. Do you have the direction from media, but for in you on

experience, I grew up with low tier positions being almost a exclusively for women. So let let let let me try and steps back and try to explain I'm trying to say, because I think I'm gonna get confusing here when I was younger, I dropped out of high school and I was trying to find work and all of the entry level positions and like the service industry, for instance, which is like most jobs working the working register being a server. We are working on a clerk at a shop, we're all being given to the younger females and not to meet, find it up homeless could find a job. When I was twenty one, I went to a bunch of bars and they wouldn't hire me. They said they hire young women, not guys, and I think seeing this trend or what are I I feel like it's in a total. For me I don't know a naturally. My response to this was not necessarily anger but drive like I will solve this problem and I will figure, but I did, but I think things are getting worse and I there's a lot of contributing factors to it. I think we're

saying this shift from you know you had when you had the roles that gender roles and now you don't, and I think we're at a hybrid point now, where I can't tell you, if it's possible for for us to live in a society with no generals, but I think what a point now we're seeing a bunch of young men who didn't grow up hearing about their role in society and now it's being eroded, and now they don't know what their purpose are passionate. So I don't know it's it's it's it's probably too complicated. All I can really do is say that it's happening and we're seeing another story. That's that's happening in the UK and the US and we're all okay. It was even happening in the air force. So the reason I bring up this story for a couple days ago is that I you know as much as I might think it's a loss of purpose. If you're in the air force, you know you've taken that step towards doing something, but even that might not be enough. So while we're definitely seeing an increase of suicide across the board, maybe it's nothing to do with gender rolls. Maybe men are just more likely to succeed, or maybe it has to do with social media hysteria. You know maybe ever

buddy is hearing this insanity over and over again they're being told that you know, there's nothing you can do to solve the problem or that you're bad. You go on social media and people attack and harass you and people like being angry online and some people can't handle it now. I imagine this. I think, about the the the mathematical equation here. If the people who don't want to engage in this behavior, you know, I don't like the the the anxiety online and social media and in our culture, are ending their lives. All that's left are either people who engage in a corrosive toxic. You know behavior online and those who are resilient to it. I don't like the prospect of that that we're moving into a place where we're gonna have a one of just really vocal angry nasty people and the other half just kind of just shrugging it off and ignoring it. While the toxicity increases, I don't know yeah, I don't know. I thought it was an interesting thing that should be talked about. I can't tell you necessarily

may maybe in the end, all that really matters is that humans as a whole have have no more purpose because we're living in luxury luxury compared to where we used to be one hundred years ago, everybody had to be working. You know the kids were working in factories. Two hundred years ago everybody was working on a farm and you had to work nonstop, otherwise, you'd literally die because you know it was there's. No technology and lack of food and energy- you know fossil fuels, contribute to a great rise in technology and exponentially increase the amount of food we could produce reducing the workload of the average person. So back, then everybody was working all the time so that a purpose today I got air conditioning got cameras. I got a computer got video games. What do you really have to d'oh? You have food, you have everything, so I think

you know. Let me say this. I know this dude this a couple, a couple of people who are extremely wealthy and they told me this was like ten years ago. I was told by this guy that the moment he became truly wealthy. He had hit an existential crisis. It was very quick. Ah it was a relatively quick rise to well if he started a company than he sold sold. Ah some digital products that went viral and the net worth skyrocketed. All of a sudden. I had all this money and then he didn't even have to do anything anymore. He had no more. Yes, he did the work. He had the money, he was done. Millions and millions upon millions of dollars like tens of millions of dollars, and so he said he said he and his friends they've talked about how they had an existential crisis because they ain't gonna work. So what do you do with your life? Some became depressed sitting around bored, while all their friends were at jobs and working all day, they had nothing to do. I heard another story: famous musician who sold the song for millions of dollars, and then he would just layer

in this house all day board. He was going crazy and he would call his old friends and they'd be like I'm working man. I can't hang out, but now that he did it, he made it and he just had so little to Dio. He just sat around board existential crisis. I think we might be seeing that on a larger scale, we as a civilization in the? U K in the? U S are extremely wealthy: everyone's gotta refrigerate air conditioning everyone's got a comfortable life. We have cell phones, we can talk to each other like that. We can play video games all day. So what do you have to do? I think people need to discover their passion. I think that's going to be their saving. Grace, like Jordan Peterson, said, find the heavy. This thing you can carry and carry it even literally, no seriously, even literally like, if you can't figure out what to do just got side and find the heaviest thing you can carry in literally pick it up and carry it just exercise, you know getting out and getting sweating exercise.

Actually you know what help, although I I understand what your peers and trying to say he's you know he's saying: take some responsibility do something I think that may be a contributing factor to the culture war in the end, so we're going through like a a civilization, accidental crisis. Where perhaps, is it perhaps we're all so wealthy? Now we've lost purpose because we don't need one. We don't need to farm, we don't need to milk, the cow is it's all done for us, and Americans are getting fat. So our people in the UK, because there's just too much abundance and maybe now purposes becoming ideological and that's why we see the rise of of you know the ideological left because they have no purpose so they've made one, that's why they say everyone's a fascist, because otherwise they have no purpose and otherwise they'd be suicidal and some people who and see that not everyone's a fascist might just be I'll leave it there stick around next time. It will be coming up at one p pm on this channel seriously. If you guys

feeling down if you're depressed everything I I you know, I I'm words by don't matter I'll, be honest. I you, I feel, like everyone always tries to tell you something like hey, don't worry, but in the end it's internal. Nothing, I can really say, is you'll, probably feel bad, but tough or not, but go clean up your room find the heaviest thing you can carry and carry it. I got. I got a lot of respect for George Peterson, I think, is worthy of criticism for a lot of you know silly things he said and done, but he's right if you're feeling depressed I'm, I can tell you you know everything will be okay. I have no idea all I can tell you this is find the heaviest thing you can carry in Kerry. I think that's pretty sound advice from from Doctor Peterson and I think you know in the end, you know I don't know be strong, be stronger overcome. I grew up what

being animal right? I know a lot of people think it's it's like you know they make fun of anime characters, but one thing that all of these characters had that I always was really inspired by is a refusal to give up and the harder things became they would respond by becoming stronger and that's you, you name an anime character. I I ii, you may not be a fan of any of these animations, but there are several characters throughout some of the biggest. You know shows that kind of Japan and they many of them share this characteristic. There beaten down they're losing and they refused to give up and they respond to desperation by growing stronger, and that's always how I've viewed every problem I face when I've been feeling down and depressed, I get angry, but not at anybody else. I get angry in general kind of that myself that I have to use that and overcome and take control. I don't know everybody can, but that's what inspired me growing up those of us those of the super heroes. I looked up to the people who would never give up no matter what.

I hope that helps. I don't know the ground I'll see you in the next segment. I wonder why it is that so many people on the left don't know anything about guns. Don't do racer x guns, don't bother to look up what the laws being proposed are and then sound silly Joe Biden he wants to ban. Basically, every single gun beta O'Roark also wants to ban basically every single gun. Now they'll tell you that's not true, but let me clarify the assault weapons bill as proposed would ban almost every single gun. I am not being hyperbolic. I am being actually, if anything, I'm kind of toning it down, because some would say that it's a complete conversation of all guns, Joe Biden. He called for a ban on all magazines. Now, maybe you could say it's a gaffe, but he sort. What do you say

any any magazine that can hold more there? We go multiple bullets. He said magazines that would hold multiple bolts, literally magazine. So what would end up happening? Is semi automatic I'm going attend like it's a bunch of liberals who don't come out guns, semi automatic means you put the you put you you love the the the the gun. You pull the trigger and put another ball the chamber. It doesn't mean you pull the trigger and keeps firing in spring. I mean one trigger pull one bullet: that's the overwhelming majority of guns effectively like a river over a semi auto because it you know rotates, but it's not necessarily so the assault weapons ban would basically banned everything other than like revolvers. You can also have a lever, action and bolt action rifles and it has been proposed that you can still own a gun if you can fire one bullet at a time. Every time you load, but that's that's basically banning all guns. Here's the thing!

Okay, I'm not a gun person met a gun nut. I don't own one I may in the future, but most Americans, most Americans oppose ban on assault rifles now hold on here's another big problem gallop and I'm actually quite offended that. Well it did this assault. Rifles have always been illegal assault. Rifle find as a selective fire rifle now again, I'm probably preaching to people who know way more about this than I do, but that sort a fire means you can do burst full, auto or semi auto. So you can switch between the meat is use us all rifles there. Fifteen is not an assault rifle. It is just a standard, semi automatic rifle. In fact, when they talk about, you know who wants to get a hunting rifle they're, basically the same thing: well, there expanding what they're calling for and here's the here's. The reason why I'm doing this video, because again, I'm not a big gun, not okay. I I, I probably fall with most Americans,

saying stricter gun laws. Make sense but hear me out stricter gun laws doesn't mean not allowing people to own guns. It just means like. Can we do a mental health check, a background check for which pretty much exist as it is so I want to be. I want to be careful on the stricter gun laws thing because maybe stricter isn't the right word, maybe more effective, more effective to ensure that people have the right to bear arms and under the constitution, but also that we're thinking smart about. What's going on with these young, these mass shooting events and how we can effectively embrace some kind of policy or law to protect the right to the innocent and safeguards against those that are not. I'm not saying I have an answer. I don't so maybe stricter isn't the right response, but I would imagine there are a lot of people that view it. Similarly, toe I do, as you know, is a moderate. I don't want any of these things band, because I done the base level research. I've looked up and seen

at you know, most people who own guns legally don't even commit any crimes and barely ever use them. Some people do it for sport, you're allowed to do it, but now we have both Joe Biden and Beta O'Rourke, calling for essentially a complete confiscation, and I really do mean this can not being hyperbolic. That's the important point, not a gun person, don't own a gun not being hyperbolic. You need to read the assault weapons ban. It specifically says semi automatic firearm capable of accepting a detachable magazine. Let's click this and you can see it's its basic, really, every single handgun, that's how they operate sure you know, there's there's revolvers or whatever. Let me make sure I show us again just to make sure you guys understand a assault weapon, as defined in the United States,

says: semi automatic arm detachable magazine. Okay, Joe Biden said Ban magazines that hold multiple bullets multiple more than one. So what is he suggesting that you can buy a handgun that can single load a ball and fire and then single? That makes no sense, I'm not even sure those things exist. I guess three D printed ones do, but he again they say: common attributes used in the legislative definitions of assault weapons include semi automatic firearm, capable look of accepting a potential magazine which in foods these standard handgun, like I say, standard because that's like what every cop has what most people has and Biden's has no compromise. He goes extreme all magazines and he's going after people in Texas

themselves look when Joe Biden said this. My immediate reaction was: is he gassed thing? You know, assaults, assault, type, weapons, magazines that can hold multiple bullets in them. It's absolutely mindless white. What would that you're? Basically saying ban all guns, so we get it Joe Biden's aghast machine, and maybe he meant high capacity magazines, but that's not what he said. He said, here's the reason I think it's a gaffe for one he's, a gaffe king magazines that can hold multiple bullets in them is literally all magazines and if he meant that he probably would have said all magazines, he probably said ban magazines in General ban the ability any gun to fire more than one, but being we loaded but Beto O'Rourke has gone one step further. They don't work is literally called for the confiscation of all ninety something percent guns. Okay, I'll try to I'm trying to avoid being hyperbolic, but as I've shown you already he's talking about handguns.

Also a little bit of this and I'll tell you a story. Politico reports and this a couple weeks ago made a work called a for gun licensing and a mandatory buy back program for assault weapons. Expanding on a controversial gun control platform. He advanced in his return to the presidential campaign, the previous day, part of a proposal to address on violence and and white nationalism. What pressure the dude who was in Ohio was in a white nationalist. Our work said that, if enacted, anyone who fail to forfeit a banned assault weapon would be fine. The mandatory buyback proposal goes further than most Democrats in the two thousand and twenty presidential field, though Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, has suggested she support such a program. So let me stress it's the most important thing he's talking about handguns. Okay, I went to the March for our life thing. Where are your people marching against weapons? And I asked I basically asked every group: do you think that, like a glock should be banned on

it is often Van and they say no, of course not. I say: well, then, why are you supporting a law that would ban them because they didn't read the law? It's all. You know what man yeah you know, I'm just the Democrats are knots. They're. Absolutely! No! I believe in fixing the environment, I believe, can be sound gun policy. I wanna call common sense. That's a stupid buzz word no, but I think if we actually sat down and talked with the firearms community, there would be a way to for one. We probably have to remove some laws in some places and then create a bowl like a off national laws. It's hard to explain, I guess for one. I don't append pretend, like, I know more than the average person, so I guarantee already going to be a ton of people, commenting saying here's what you got wrong. I get it and that's why I think we need to actually sit down and talk about the current laws, the current capacity of the weapons, how people on average get them and why we're talking about in the first place, I would stress there

I mean going around talking about preventable deaths, of which rifles account for like very little, in which case I I believe it's conspiracy to seize your guns. I think it's a it's a it's a boogeyman. You know these. These air fifteens looks look scary, and then we see these. You know these these tragedies, the tragic events, and so the Democrats are like even no it's not a serious problem relative to you know like I know, heart disease or something or peanut allergies like which kill way more people, it's scarier. It's also why he talks about white nationalism and not the fact that there are far left militias that are armed as well, because the media doesn't talk about him. They're, not scared. By this. They poo poo it actually, oh, and it was no big deal so what they, cracked, a guy with that and put it in the hospital, and I'm not talking about Andy, no talk about the guy in Portland. Actually, Andy was in Portland two okay, two guys in Portland were cracked over the head with with with brain injuries because of anti phone. They don't talk about it. In fact, there was recently a mass shooting where the perpetrator killed ten people in high school.

I am and then talk about that either and many people believe it was eight a because it didn't fit the white nationalist. You know racial Meredith. They found a boogeyman. They want to use that book and it to gain our right to rally voters, but most people disagree with this. It makes me wonder you know, I think what what what what what you often see in the in the primaries and, of course many of us talk that talk about this before they pander to the farthest of the left, the activist base, so they can, when the primary and then bring it back to the center for the general, but they've gone too far, both bite in and walk, calling for. Basically, a ban on ninety five percent of guns when we can see according to get all up Americans do support stricter gun laws, but not banning assault rifles. The important thing is assault. Rifle makes literally no sense because they're already illegal but sure what they mean is assault, weapon and they're confusing the issue they said is a big support. You know, what's what's poor

background checks, I'm pretty sure they're already are federal, federal back background checks, I'm not entirely sure. I know it's been an issue in the mainstream, the conversation about them universal background checks. The importance of gun control is a voting. Issue has increased in the past two decades. Americans supported six of seven ways to deter mass shootings a month after parkland. They say. At the same time, Americans thought prevention efforts. Mental health screenings would be more effective than stricter gun laws. So it looks like a you know: a man made O'Rourke and Joe Biden are pandering to no one, because the average American is that really embracing this from a kind of a kind of common sense. Point of view, I also want to stress, is not a conservative issue because states like New Hampshire and Vermont, for instance, they're they're, blue states, but people their own weapons

Maine. For instance, I'm pretty sure mine is blue, but the gun laws are ridiculously lacks there. Like I'm, pretty sure. If you can live there, you can just go and just show up and buy a gun, I'm pretty sure they do a background check, but it's pretty quick and I think they have no permit concealed carry. There are some states that are like. I tend to be red, but this isn't a conservative versus liberal issue. It's a woke, progressive, far left issue of banning everyone's guns and I got to admit nothing makes sense anymore. Nothing makes sense for one reason they claim that Trump is a fascist, they claim the white nationals are taking over and then they backed the guy and which I think is fascist, to take their guns. So I don't know man, you know I I I saw these these two stories and the the the Joe Biden gaffe. I ordered. Maybe it's not a guest maybe be wants to ban all magazines. I mean, theoretically, the assault weapons ban would do that, but it seems like they're getting more and more extreme and they're crazy

magazines hold multiple bullets. That's the point. This call from Biden would ban most handguns right except for like revolvers or I guess, single load guns which probably exists. I don't know anything about it, though anyway Joe but ends by saying. I think there is no compromise. This is one we have to just push and push and push and push in push in you'll. It will never happen if they banned all guns. That's the quickest way to see I mean first of all, I really doubt police department would enforce that law. I'd be shocked, maybe in big cities, but not an urban area and we've already seen some police up in the Pacific Northwest refusing to enforce some of these bands. So the Democrats have gone nuts I'll put it that way. If most Americans don't agree with you, why would you pander to a policy? Nobody wants? I don't know whatever bit off the cuff but I'll leave it there stick around next time it will be at four p dot m in the main channel youtube dot com

TIM cast. I is a different channel and I will see you all there as an addendum to the main video I did they don't make channel. I want to talk about Trump allies Ray using money to target reporters see the action. The story is that there are some people who are conservative and they had been digging up old, embarrassing tweets. The New York Times was shocked and outraged that anyone would dare try and expose them for their bad behavior and then claimed it was a loose knit group of Trump allies trying to discredit the reporters in response. It would seem that there's now go to be. I guess, an official fund raising effort using the press. The New York Times congratulate New York Times. You've played yourself so I'll. Take a look at this story before we get started head over to TIM, cast dot com, slash done it. If you'd like to support my work, there's a Paypal option, a crypto option, physical address, but of course just try this, but if you like it, Schering helps overcome the do

ranking that you two dollars to my channels and other independent political commentators. That's right! That's because I don't I'm talk more. I wanna talk about more than just what the Trump allies are doing. I want to point out. First and foremost, the left has been doing this forever. Media matters, for instance, exists and there's also this study, which is actually a couple months old, which shows that the left absolutely hold a double standard in how they want to apply censorship, which makes sense when you, when you, when you realized how they target these trump supporters for doing exactly what media matters does. Let's read acts Theo's, which I'm not a big fan of reports. President Trump's political allies are trying to raise at least two dollars million to investigate reporters and editors of the New York Times, the Washington, Post and other outlets. According to a three page, fundraising pitch reviewed by accepts why it matters Trump's war on the media is expanding. Oh Trump's war. This group will talk it reporters and editors while other GOP, two thousand and twenty

go after the social media platforms. Alleging bias officials tell us the group claims it will slip, damaging information about reporters and editors to friendly media outlets such as bright Bart and traditional media. If possible, people involved in raising the funds include GOP consultant, Arthur Schwartz, and he quote: loose network of the New York Times reported last week is targeting journalists. The operations are to be run by undisclosed, others, they say the prospectus for the new project says it's targeting the people producing the news, the irony. It's actually really irony, the New York Times exposed an extremely improvisational effort that it out at a times, editor for past anti semitic tweets the new. This new growth is now using the exposure to try to formalize and fund the operation. There you go New York Times, you've done backfired and played yourself organizer's joke that their slogan should be brought to you by the New York Times under quote primary targets: the

let's CNN, MSNBC, all broadcast networks, New York Times, Washington, Post Buzzfeed, having a post and all others that routinely incorporate bias and misinformation into their coverage. We will also track the reporters and editors of these organizations. They going to say this isn't an entirely new concept. The liberal group media matters monitors journalists and publications and goes public with complaints of bias. But being this blatant specific about trying to discredit individual reporters is new. I actually don't really think so. I think this is what media matters overtly. Does I mean? Do they re? We hide it, I got to say I'm really. I feel really sorry for people who read this website thinking it's really seriously wait hold on. They got a green check. Mark okay; no, they don't they don't. Okay, so news man, news guards as media matters doesn't post fake news, but they don't correct errors. I wonder if, as an about section, we can dig dig into probably not okay, we go through the about section. For me

matters they say. Media matters for America is a web based not for profit progress. Several research and information center dedicated to comprehensive monitoring, analyzing and correcting conservative misinformation in the? U S, media. Is that a way you're saying lie or mislead, because I can tell you right away: they've lied and misled people about me, so I can certainly assume they would do it about others launched. May two thousand and four media matters for America put in place for the first time the is to systematically monitor a cross section of print broadcast. Yet he look. We get the point. Media matters is literally what they're claiming the Trump supporters now want to do, so maybe they should name it something similar. But whenever we talk about the media and the bias there are literally nonprofits where they employ people to do nothing but but watch conservative content and then smear,

and then, when Trump supporters say hey we'll do that they go you get Haram. Fi say how dare conservatives call them out? Look at the New York New York Times actually coming out with a story saying Trump supporters are trying to to come after us because they don't like are reporting what what have you guys been doing? Okay, welcome to the party, you started your lucky conservatives held back as long as they did now. Here's the thing people on the left think they're the benevolent dictators they tend as a as of today used. It didn't used to be this way. They're not fact checking their just believe thing whatever it is. They hear on the internet, of course, they're conservatives who fall into this trap too, but it's overwhelmingly the left and this one model and conservatives tend to agree on a worldview and liberals don't. But there is this study here called the ideology of censorship and they have the abstract, essentially proving

the left wants to censor ideas that they don't like, and they don't want to censor ideas they do like because they don't have a consistent principle backing what they're actually doing, they just say, rules for the, but not for me. I get power, you don't so. Why would we ever want to empower group of people that want power for no reason other than to have it? That's the last person who should in charge right the person should be in charge of a person doesn't want to be, which is one of the biggest problems we have. Is that you know everybody who wants to be a politician. Probably shouldn't be: let's read this: I'm not going to read the entire up. You know people cation much of this from a few months ago. This is from is the ideal ideology of censorship. A research gate by Bo Winegard, Corey, J Clarke and even

so so only say this two of what I've. Maybe I've been wrong in my assessment? Let's read this, so we can get their actual assessment of what's happening, that the study says. Recent work has suggested that liberals have sacred values about protecting low status groups and thus are particularly prone to bias against any information that portrays the group's unfavorably in a pre registered study and equals five hundred. Fifty nine we tested whether liberals would support more censorship of information that portrays low status groups unfavorably, that quote out, so they say that many involved to be better leaders and when in doubt and and they gonna talk about Islam in terror and white people, intelligence, etcetera. That's the that Ben similar information that portrays high status groups unfavorably. So you know what they say: that women involved to be better leaders that man, Christianity, is violent, etcetera. So you can even see how the inverted it. The results very clearly supported predictions. Let

rules consistently displayed double standards in their censorship preferences, such that they deserve to censor information that portrays low status groups. Unfavorably, more than information portrays high status groups on favorably moderates and conservatives supported more similar levels of censorship, regardless of whether the information was favorable toward relatively high or low status groups, but conservatives display a small preference for censoring christian violence over islamic violence. Exploratory analysis also revealed that millennials might be slightly more in support of censorship and generation x in general, but baby boomers sent but baby boomers censorship. Support generally fell between that of generation x and millennials, perhaps that what to do with millennials being the children of boomers for the most part, but we can see something couple things interesting here: first, what are they using to determine what a low status group is?

I'm sure it's probably in the research- and I you know, I'm not going to pull up the full text of the pdf got a sign up into my stuff like that, but they they do so. I'm not gonna read through everything, but I guess yes, it's all here right. Well, anyway, here's what here's, what I want to point out, what makes someone a low status group and why I find this study work, do something a low status group to the in the eyes of the left. Isn't necessarily those without power, they believe multi millionaires are low status. People who are you know you can't criticize, or are you can't try and you know their power, their individuals who are extremely powerful in politics? Ocasio Cortez is one of them sure. Maybe a year ago she was a nobody, but now she's a congresswoman and Jess tremendous power. When people criticize her she does her up. I say how dare you challenge a woman of color? This is the problem with, in my p, in the liberal censorship media matters is trying to get people taken down using this bias, and that's

pretty worrisome. If you ask me when you realize, there's no principle behind what they're actually advocating and we can see that model conservatives support similar levels of censorship regardless. I think censorship is bad, but the fact that moderates and conservatives are acting on principle makes sense in the left. Isn't the left just wants power if you're someone like Dave, Chappelle a black man and you chat with them, they will slam you. If you're Serena Williams, they will claim you're a poor innocent victim in the end, what they end up doing is propping up the oligopoly. The wealthy look right now, the military industrial complex, the big weapons manufacturers in the US are all headed by women. Congratulations, feminism, you've won, and now you can't challenge them because well well, that would biased against a low status group. You see the problem with a challenge: people based on the content of their character, not the color of their skin, not their religion. I don't think the let's. Let's, let's, let's make this point

Islam, you know they mention in the study. It's a low status group in the? U S, maybe but in the world not really, and it's another issue by all means, let's, let's call out the bigotry against religious groups, but are you going to empower a goal? Mobile power? You know and allow these people to gain a foothold in countries where they don't have a large enough majority up until they get a majority, it doesn't make sense. I got a bad idea, we'll call it out, regardless of who you are records, of the color of your skin, your gender or where you've come from or what God, you believe in bad ideas are bad ideas period. So here's the big point and I'll wrap this up. They're shocked. Now that trump supporters are playing the same game as media matters right. It's not just media matters, tons of left wing media companies do the same thing. They act like the moral arbiters in the police, and we can see it's in the study that when it comes to the intersectional ideology, there's no principals behind this. These are people who want power for the sake of having power, those were the last people should get it so stick around. I got a couple more segments coming up in a few minutes, and I will see you all

shortly. The cliffs are eroding the way I've described the censorship problems that were all standing on. This big island, that's you, know one hundred feet up and there's water crashing at the shore, but as that water crashes into the edges of this platform, it erodes people like me who might be in the center know that a certain point, the cliff, is a routing from one direction and I will eventually fall off of it. So, in the past I've been very critical of the censorship of the far right and the alt right things like that, even long as they're not breaking the rules to an extent. I know the rules are biased themselves. They should be okay, but there have been many people, who've broken no rules and have been banned. Recently there have been people like James Alsup, for instance. I don't know what's going on with this channel, but I don't want to act like I know a lot about his particular political ideology is, I don't really know the guy, but people have referred to him as all to ride or white nationalist or whatever, I'm not going to make that accusation, but I will highlight others have done that and I'm highlighting it to make one point

whether or not he actually holds those views. I'm pretty sure you know. I've talked to a lot of people who said he does I'm trying to be very careful, but his channel was deleted and he broke no rules. This is the problem you see. How do I know that I will have a child tomorrow. I don't break any rules, I don't even swear. You know I try to be advertiser friendly. They still do monetize my content, but then approve it for monetization later how about this monkey Jones? You may remember this guy. He had what three and seven thousand subs deleted his channel his second channel any new channel. He broke no rules. His videos were even monetized. I not give people a warning because it's such a it's getting more strikes out Youtube says it has removed more than one hundred thousand videos under new hate speech, rules, new roles meeting these people didn't get a chance. Yes, they had their videos purged, even though you see other retroactively applying these rules and the danger I've been thinking about this, and I feel like the only thing I can really do

is delete every single video of both my channels. I never know at what point they might change the rule and say: hey TIM, you are critical. The Democrats, we, the new rule, that you can't criticize political parties because of the escalation of tensions and violence and then what my channel gets retroactively, punished and deleted. Yes, it happened before. Let's read the story and see what's currently going on with the purging of you, two videos before we get started head over to Youtube dot com. Slash TIM cast, I'm I'm sorry head over to TIM, cast dot com, slash donate! If you want to support my work. The reason this is so important because there are, but early just deleting Youtube channels. Now, while I do think I'm safe to an extent, things are ramping up for two thousand and twenty and I'm having a sensor more and more stuff. It's getting really annoying. We did for sub verse. We had on the ground reporters at an event. We couldn't actually show you the factual information, because it could get us banned on Youtube. We can't cover the news, it's effect,

so we have to say like the extended coverage and the things that would get his band are here. This is what TIM cast dot com slash on it exists for if, in the event much those are deleted, I'd like to still live. You know what I mean. I'd like to be able to buy food and pay my bills. By supporting me on these platforms for crypto through a physical address or Paypal, you ensure that in the event Youtube you know hacks my channels to bits. I will at least have a short amount of time to try and figure out how to keep producing content and survive in the event that I can no longer do this. So there are all you know I'll try to have. Certainly you know there are people who want me to go work at companies, but let's keep independent. Let's read the story from the hill. A report Youtube said Tuesday that has removed more than one hundred thousand videos marked as hate speech under the platforms, new policy against bigoted and supremacist content. The video sharing

giants editor moved more than seventeen thousand channels and one hundred thousand videos for violating its hate speech policy between April and June, the month in which the policy was instituted. I'm pretty sure criticizing veterans is now called hate speech. They say a five time increase in the number of removals in the first three months of the year. Google own Youtube also said it has removed more than five hundred million comments for hate speech, double the amount of removals in the first quarter of the year. I'm at the point where I'm thinking I should just disable comments out, because they're now trying to use comments against the channel they've done in the past. What you, what you're supposed to do, just hey here's, a tv channel right quote the spikes in removal numbers are in part due to the removal of older comments, videos and channels that were previously permitted, they're literally saying they are retroactively. Applying rules to me, that's not even twitter, didn't do that over

all in the second quarter of this year, you to remove more than four million channels, mostly for violating its policies against scams and spam and more than nine million videos. Well, you know I can recognize the scams and spam thing. That's really annoying Youtube emphasized that it is focus on removing harmful or offensive content before it is viewed by any users on the site. According to Post Youtube's effort have result, have resulted in an eighty percent reduction in views, content that is later removed for violating the platforms policies. Youtube has come under increasing scrutiny from civil rights groups, lawmakers

and regulators over the past year for a range of issues, including children's pirates, privacy and extremist content, but I must stress what civil rights group group is gonna oppose free speech. It makes you wonder if they're, actually, four rights or against them. Listen. You have no right not to be offended. You have a right to speak your mind. You have a right to exist equally under the law. Civil rights groups, if they're coming to you two been demanding content, be removed their aunt, the civil rights groups or they're like what would you call that they're not for civil rights? I guess you could theoretically still say they are a civil rights group in that they're, a negative civil rights group. They want to say, despite comes after Youtube in June, updated it's hate speech, policies to ban videos that promote ideologies. What like privacy or cast superiority now, that's kind of where he worked. I don't know much about cats superiority, I guess, but I have to wonder if India is your take offense to that, that's a that's going for the whole

culture, a move that was applauded by critics who have been pushing the website to take more action against hateful content that has proliferated on this platform. The policy change also banned content that promotes conspiracies. So just the false claims of Sandy Hook elementary school shooting never happened, which is a weird thing to begin with, but you know the challenge for me in this regard when it comes to fake news and we're entering really murky dangerous territory. Here, man, if I publish a story that is factually true, but no one backs it up its original reporting. Can I be deleted? What if the media all says, one thing is true and I report the contrary. It's happened before everybody reporting on a story: the AP covered it and I challenged it and I proved it wrong. My video got taken down not for being a conspiracy, but it got taken down for being like ball being or something, and then a couple days later, when the AP retracted the story. Oh surprise, surprise Youtube reinstates my video youtube. By doing this

straight up, saying we are going to make sure the only contact that that can exist on top will come from mainstream publications first and then you to what constitutes something not be a conspiracy seriously. If is Russia get a conspiracy? Yes, was it wrong? Yes, why does Youtube allow? It should Youtube, go back now and delete every single report from CNN Msnbc and Fox NEWS about Russia Gate well, admittedly, Fox NEWS was more on the right side of that one okay, Rachel Maddow, show, I think, it's time to delete her channel retroactively, because she's promoted conspiracies right. What what? What? What? What's that you isn't actually going to take any action against major corporate channels who have pushed nonsense before uh? Okay, what the New York Times the New York Times, hiring Sarah junk yeah we get it

Youtube, is trying to make sure that independent channels cannot ever be mainstream. They are bending the name need to the mainstream and then look at Netflix the Dave Chappelle special. You see what happens, Dave, Chappelle, specialist hate speech, it ISS according Youtube's rules, and it's being it's it's almost well. I don't want to university at universally acclaimed, but it is getting a lot of support millions of views on the video well over a million views in the years I've made about it. Tons of people are praising it moderates and conservatives at least, but it's generating attention Youtube, wants to make sure they never get that attention again. Some people say this is how you could predict the end of Youtube, because when people don't know what they can or can't upload on their channels are deleted. They go somewhere else. You know it's really interesting bit shoot

on bitch you'd. I've got something like sixty thousand subs, not that many, I don't actively engage with it. It just automatically uploads my videos but they're a lot of people who choose to go there instead and there are a lot of people who have been taken down from Youtube who go there instead. So here's the thing you do if you won't support edgy content, if your rules are vague, if you claim conspiracies are bad and you'll ban people, but then you don't ban MSNBC or Rachel Maddow. Specifically, then rules mean literally nothing and in the end people will lose confidence going native James Elles up, for instance. I know that he was very, very careful about not breaking any rules. He has opinions. I've honestly never watched any of his videos. So I can't tell you what those opinions are. I do know that having talked to a lot of people they've expressed how he's always been extremely careful, so you know what I'll say this. Maybe he wasn't, but it's my understanding. You have like the guy to point out that

Youtube can tell you the rules, and you can say you got it I'll, follow the rules and they will delete you anyway, a better example being Monkey Jones. They say in the Tuesday Blog Post Youtube refer to the hate speech policy, update as a fundamental shift. We spent months carefully developing the policy and working with our teams to create the necessary trainings and tools required to enforce it. The policy was launched in early June and as our teams review and review and remove more content in line with the new policy, our machine detection will improve in Tandem yep. That means it's only a matter of time before I get deleted seriously. That is this. Merely just keep coming to hit me just keep coming. This is their end goal Youtube is going to delete everybody. So I'll tell you this before you sign off, go subscribe to youtube dot com, Slash TIM cast IRL, I am gonna, be producing travel travel and behind the scenes, scenes content and, admittedly, admittedly, Youtube might delete this channel along with the rest,

is my content anyway, regardless of what I published, because that's what they do, but look at this. There are now three TIM cast channels. What a weird thing TIM Cast, IRL Tim cast and TIM Pool is the TIM Cast Channel and there's also sub verse, hopefully Youtube. Let's the milquetoast fence. Sitter continue making content, but I'm going to have to say it's probably not going to happen. If I'm not going to be likely, they leave me alone. I think they'll come for everybody, they will, unless you're Jimmy Kimmel or whatever they're going to purge anybody who is not perfectly in line with the mainstream going to do about it. Stick around. I got one more segment coming up in a few minutes and I will see you all shortly: isn't chick fil a like America's favorite, fast food restaurant right now. Can I just stress, I absolutely love chick fil. A is really really good right. I like Wendy's too, I'm not a big, fast food, eater, ok, so you're not going to see you go into these places very often, but I gotta admit that chick fil, a sauce, has some good stuff. The other day I was making a bagel and we had some leftover chick fil, a sauce, and I use it on

big on everything bagel sandwich. It was amazing a little sugary though there's a reason why I'm praising Chick fil A's delicious, delicious food, and it's and it's not because I want you to go, spend money there. Let's make a point chick fil, a is a fast food restaurant is the health healthiest place in the world? No, but the food is really good and most people really like it, but the left is trying take away. The left is trying to take away our chicken sandwiches. Why this is the weirdest fight to engage in faculty at can university want chick fil, a thrown off campus? It's a quote bastion of bigotry. No, it isn't. It was a cup old guys. Several years ago, who made a five figure, a low five figure donation to a group that campaign for traditional marriage, I don't care how big is the company? It's you, a ton of people, they probably make way more money and no barely any of it goes to any political groups. In the end, it's just chicken sandwich. If you don't like it, don't buy it, you see what they do

instead of saying. I won't support this. They should say we must destroy it. Look just can't tens university of a right to get rid of a fast food restaurant for the political beliefs of two people to come funny to me. That sounds insane, but we are seeing this ever increasing tactic from the left to destroy everything that runs afoul of their group. Thank sorry, dude. This is the weirdest. What you've been engaging in,

because guess what America really likes: chick fil e, those chicken sandwiches man. I like that grilled chicken with chick fil a sauce, and then I got the little chicken nuggets and get the waffle fries on. I just load up on the chick fil, a sauce. Okay. I don't really eat chick fillet that often there's one nearby, but I'm just I'm just sort of pointing this out. Can I say this people in this country are not going to get behind your political protest over their delicious chicken sandwiches. In fact, just recently, ah dude pulled a gun at a Popeye's because they ran out of chicken sandwiches. You think you could you're gonna you're gonna win this political fight, you're nuts I'll tell you this man look. I've talked about the civil war and the left to the right. The Democrats, you wanna, know what's really going to get support for Donald Trump chick fillet getting banned. I like I and I hold on. I know it sounds silly, but this is they should be, but I'll make this. The thesis of this video think about this now truck comes out and says

the left is going crazy. They want to ban everything, they're censoring everything, and then you go one day. Imagine this! You know. I hope we don't be. You know just regular old Middle America, family are guy, gets off work. Can't he doesn't want to talk politics proposal, chick fil a and he goes man. I worked all day and I got the kids screaming in my ear and I don't want that delicious chicken sandwich, because Americans really do like it and everybody orders and got a smile on his face and he's thinking like man, it's gonna be great. We get home, we're gonna, have a nice chicken sandwich is awesome. He comes home one day. You know expecting to have this sweet, delicious, chick fil a and, unfortunately, the protesters shut down, store, couldn't open, and now this regular middle american man is saying what is happening. Why can't I have a normal chicken sandwich and- and here comes Trump bowl Horning on Twitter or in front of the White House. You know with all the reporters running goes. You got these people trying to shut down chicken sandwich shops and it's ridiculous. The Democrats are supporting

crazy leftist and I'll. Tell you what man you can go after every mainstream issue. For me, I think war is a big problem. I really really do. I think we need to plumb a c and I think we've got issues you know the way I explained it on Crowder. I don't know if this meant to show, but is that when people get into the office of the presidency, they see all this power they have and they say well, it's just easier for me to use it right, I'm in charge. I control it, it's better that I do this and then they drone strike into this. These things. I don't like it, but I'll tell you one thing: if I go to some, you know forty year old dude, and I say I really want you to support tulsi gabbard because he's opposing war he's in a bad look man. I don't know anything about this, I'm sure it's a complicated issue. I I'm I'm gonna, have to just think about it to me really really difficult to take my word for it. I've done canvassing campaigning and fund raising before for nonprofits, where I'm trying to convince someone like listen man, D4 station is really bad trust me, and so

people say I just don't know enough about it to commit. I understand how about this, how about chick, fil a gets shut down at the university and I'm standing out in front with the clipboard saying bring back chick fil a somebody walks up and there like or oh? No, no, no, no, no, no, not chick fil a, but you know stop the censorship, something like that and I say, and they walk up and they're staring at the closed chicken restaurant and they can't get that sandwich. And I say it's a shame. You can't have that sandwich right. Another angry, I say: well, it's because of cancel culture. It's because of these outraged leftist and now all of a sudden, they're ears perk up and they say, tell me who to vote for toe, get me my chicken sandwich. I know it sounds silly, but this kind of stuff it's close to home, okay, but I should probably read a little bit about this, but I think that really is the more important takeaway. When you go after people's comedy, don't be surprised if they vote for the guy in favor of comedy, you go

Dave Chapelle Joe Rogan record. Your base don't be surprised when they side against you sang I don't like, but you're, taking away the things that make me feel good I'll, admit man fast food too much of it. It's a bad thing, but if you're just going for you, you have a bad day at work and all you really want to with those we, those crispy waffle, fries dipped in that sweet, tangy, orange sauce and the protesters are taking it away from you. These people are going to vote trump in two seconds if they can't get their waffle fries. So I know you know when I was younger. I was always complaining about how people were active in politics, about how I I just say: listen: man, the stuff. The US is doing overseas, the the the you know the the drone strike all by they'd, be like I don't I don't care. Dude has no effect on me. I don't care they go and vote for the guy who promises um. You know what whatever they can get. You know like, like Obama, says we're gonna get you health care, they vote for it and that's fine. I understand that right, but they're voting for their

selfish interests and it's frustrating. So now I can just say this man: you want to take away something that people really like. They will side against you. It's not just chicken sandwich, I'm just using this as a stand in for this general idea. Like imagine, if tried banning booze you're going to lose, your gonna lose that one America did. People are immediately going to flock to the people who are going to give him their vices back, be at fast food, alcohol or even marijuana. That's right, Democrats are gonna, get a ton of support by sending legalized marijuana Dan Crenshaw said he disagreed is not so sure. That's a bad play. Man, people like freedom, okay, don't hurt others, but if you want to eat a chicken sandwich with a beat you'll you'll have a beer with a chicken sandwich. While smoking to do be, do more power to you, man, you you you do whatever you'd like you know. We have some rules here. You can't drink or Moke over the age of under the age of twenty one, totally get it. We gotta have some some reason in moderation, but I'll tell you what, if you're sitting on your crappy old nineteen eighties couch, that you got from a thrift

sore and you're watching you know an episode of family guy and you want to enjoy chicken sandwich. You know, Miller, Lite and then smoke a joint dude. I literally don't care, you know what you want to do. It makes you happy in the privacy of your own home just be safe. You know, don't hurt, kids enjoy your fast food, that's what that's! What the the we! It is a really big issue. It's a it's a really, but it's a big bonus for the left. Republicans you gotta get on this. You gotta get on the freedom train, okay, but this is what's insane censoring people shutting things down. I can't believe I've rented this much on chick fil, a let's read a little bit. They say at Kansas University, some faculty members calling chick fil a a bastion of bigotry, are fighting against allowing America's most popular fast food, I'm going to chick fil after this way to go now. Ok, I'm not going to go. Get some healthy food, no offense, chick fil, a they say America's most popular fast food chain to move from a campus base

meant to the school's main student center, as well as sponsor the chick fil, a coin toss for every home football game. The fast food chain has operated for fifteen years in the basement of KU's Wescoe Hall, as Kansas Datacom reported. Of course it's it's! The gender diversity people wrote a letter to the university saying and the spring we spoke out to denounce the decision to relocate the business, which is a history of supporting organizations that ok, ok, I'm not going to read you. You know you, you know, I'm not gonna, be there stupid letter. It was two guys and it was like twenty five K. One time now. Yes, there have been some story saying they have other employees and other high ranking people. The company may have made nations as well, but the company itself didn't do it. The left wants to argue yeah yeah yeah, but these people make their money for chick fillet. Do it's not chick fillet? It was the individual who had who had the jobs. Are you going to boycott Wendy's because the woman working the register happens to be a Christian that makes literally no sense, they've lost it another go.

You have your chicken restaurants. It was a really great mean that said, you know fifty years from now, they'll say the great battle in the culture. One great bet on the culture war in two thousand and nineteen was left wing groups fighting against a chicken restaurant. Is this the most important thing that we could be fighting over? Well? Apparently, so I gotta say man. I think this is the perfect example of how insane the left has gone. College republicans are fighting back Garrett Miller, a spokesman for the college Republicans group at the university noted of the fast food chains university outlet, usually any I'm of the day. It's just packed chick fillet doesn't discriminate area. That's that! That's that! That's that's! Okay, I'm done chick fillet is always got lines out the door. Why are a what was wrong these people? Do I do try to keep these shorts? I'm not gonna, read too much of it, but I'm going to stress the final point.

I wonder what's going to happen? Actually you know what hold on hold on it's a good thing. You know why this college students who are being inundated with this propaganda and nonsense that all costumes a lot of them. They packed the lines at Chick fil a and now their own allies are trying to shut it down. What better way to lose, support and get Donald Trump elected. Then they take away someone's fried chicken seriously dude people like this stuff, whatever I made my point I'll see you guys tomorrow at ten a dot m.