There's been an ongoing story involving the gives MOTO media network Org is MOTO media, whatever its name is. This is formerly part of Gawker. Very storied media agency, was destroyed after a lawsuit by whole Coggan financed by Pierre TEAL. Parts of it were sold to unification unification then mix that around and sold it to a company called Great Hill partners and something truly profound, as happened. That has. Blown my mind completely and outright one of the former employees pushing back on the new earth openly admits they push woke politics specifically to make money. I could you not saying it's not about editorial purity, it's about making money and growing the business to me rather shocking, because you'd think most of these companies are trying claim their their sticking to there

independent editorial standards. No, this woman, Megan Greenwell in no uncertain terms, pushes back saying It is absolutely not about idealistic journalists. Unconcern with profit, pushed opposed against ruthless business. Doers. No, they say the real story that journalists that dead spin and its sister sites, like mostly what's, I know, are eager to do work. That makes money, and I could you not reading into the story really did blow my mind to see someone at one of these companies admit their sports website debt Spin is a sports website writing about politics and media. Why? And they openly admit it to make money to make money. They don't care about this stuff. They don't care about the ideas. They don't care about. The politics they

care about making money, and this is, as I've said, I don't wanta stories. I wanna go through a show this. This is this. Is this while I say well, I've talked about this for a while that companies would get on Facebook figure out what worked and turn it into a formula to its hold rage bait to make people click, what ends having a website like dead, spin sports news without access favour or discretion. Major league baseball and I fell, while your team socks. Why are they talking about sports? Oh, it's an interesting there, a bunch of websites that can talk about politics, but what they found is that, instead of talking about sports, they can talk about politics and get a different audience. Why do that? Why not just make a political lab site? Well. All of these companies have found that policy generates more traffic. That's why we see Trump in the news all day. Every day this why intersection of feminism is becoming so prominent, intersect,

nor feminism stuffs all the key words into a stories. Only. Let me give you an example. Granted I will state is my current working hypothesis, which is being researched but check it out. If you make a start worried that has a key word say: Autonoe Feminism as an ex we'll call it variable acts Let's say you have than men's right. That's why you you can make an article about feminism, it get ex views or an article about men's rights and get why views right about both in the same article and get acts plus why views get it? What that means is, if I write a story and posted to Facebook, the people that are likely to see it are those at interact specifically with feminism. If I write about men's rights, the only people interact with men's rights are going to see it and click on it, because the algorithm is feeding it to people who they think might most like it combined the two. And you get both audiences. Thus woke media knows interest.

Actuality, combining every possible keyword in a one story. You know black lives matter, police, brutality, white, black, trans, etc. Is gonna get a bigger audience and they want to make you angry, because rage generates the most traffic and sure enough. We have this story, the adults in the room where Verity showed you they say it's not about idealistic journalists now check this out I'll. Do it for at a total, pure Yonah rigid this this this section. The number is apparently do not matter to my sensibly numbers obsessed bosses for reasons. I can't quite understand when I have told them that the data show that non sports content brings more traffic and more revenue opportunities. I have been ignored. Maybe it's because there are websites for politics and there needs to be a place for sports thing, this way, if you make a pot politics website and put all of those articles on that website, you'll get the same traffic people who are looking for those stores we'll get it or other

What we want to hear about the latest anime match well they're going to leave dead, spend so, yes, that's been, may get that traffic from politics, but what about the other market? Your ignore so, it makes sense that the bosses are like stick to sports and that's what they're complaining about, more when I have told them. The data show that readers prefer publications with a distinctive point of view. That day, has been succeeds precisely because it doesn't try to be all things to all people. Wait. What you are. I have been told. That being All things to all people is, in fact exactly the way to grow. Page views, NEO confusing I gotta beyond because I can talk about sports or you try and do everything. The rest my colleagues are not going to suddenly start sticking to sports is not about editorial purity, it's about the opportunity to grow the audience and make more money for great Hell partners,

but the adults in the room know that we are wrong, despite all the evidence, because they just now and there it is and there it is now. In the past I hit peace, came out about dead, spends new bosses complaining about the white people being hired and everyone's immediate reaction was there trying to purge weakness. I mean that that was my interpretation and I still believe that to be the case, I would look at this from business. If I were to look at this from a business point of view, here's what I see you have a company that can attract a major sports audience which has massive and they are not, and you tell them hate, leave the politics somewhere else. Let's do sports, they get angry. Why? Because politics content does better, I agree politics, content does but does better than many sports art. Fantastic great, so we'll make a website for politics. It doesn't mean they're, like you know it's like. Imagine us that's due to a restaurant analogy if you opened a chinese food restaurant and then

add somebody started selling pizza the shop and that we start selling really well, and then he said hey. Listen, stop selling pizza, we're a chinese food shop. Also have a pizza cells butter, that's great! How about we open a pizza shop? Then? Ok, this there are people who specifically want. One thing you are: you are: you are removing the people who want that product because you found one products does better But here's the thing the owners already have a pizza shop. They dont need seven what they need is a diverse diversified market. Because I'll tell you this: when dead spin goes fallen for politics and the politics change, they will fall and then there will be no sports affiliated website. So it makes sense for the owners to say stick to sports, but here we can see it and what we amazing things. I've ever read straight up, saying the reason there they're not gonna, stop talking about politics is not editorial purity. It's about grow in the business and making money

for its all about, isn't it I love how they say. That's you know, I do what I do to make money. Well, first of all, don't we all we do things that are trying to make money, but, first and foremost, we're doing things that we are passionate about. Now I recognize you are passionate about politics. I would recommend going to work for a political website. Not a sports website My channel, on the other hand, has literally always been news and politics all ways I haven't changed. Could you imagine if my channels, office sports commentary and evolve to where it was today, people might question why that was when in reality, my channel and my work has always centred around cultural politics, conflict, crisis, etc, and now the big story of of these past few years has been the culture war, Tromp, the presidency etc, and that's when I talk about and this, but I've been the ground at multiple, culturally political events around the world.

That's what I do check this out there is. This is fascinating, is because we recently saw Washington recently, but there was opposed from the outline MIKE's drop, how MIKE Dotcom, exploited social justice for collect. And then abandoned a staff that believed in it check this out. The facebook driven success was no accident. Every time MIKE had hit. It would still that success into a formula and then replicated until it was dead, successful, quote frameworks or headlines that went through this. This process includes quote science proof t k in one perfect, tweet, Tiki Tiki reveals the one brutal truth about t, K, Imelda means and T Kay, celebrity just add T k thing about DK issue. Here is what it's important at one point: according to an early staffer Hudson's left new. Writers had to follow a formula with bold sections which ensured

our stories didn't leave readers with any questions, the intro, the problem, the context that take away. They distilled everything onto a social justice formula that they were criticised for absolutely criticized sport, and here we can see former employees of debts Ben. I believe former I believe she's left now was the big story recently straight up, saying: that's what we do and that's why we do it. So what then happens too to the Democratic party? What then habits happens to ideal? left us to believe there being told the truth, who believe they're getting honest opinions about politics when in reality they are going to a sports website. Seeing something about a media company and its being shovelled down their throats and an attempt to get them to click, click, click. We all know it why? Why should we trust the media? Here? It's really amazing. Earlier today I did a segment. Donald Trump believes the media is trying to derail his presidency and stop them from getting reelected their pushing a recession.

I believe that is true in many circumstances, not it's not like you know. Every single media company does this, but there are certainly people do it, but what we can see here is Many of them are only doing it to make money. We ve known about the trump up, but what's truly free, fascinating with the story? Is this woman is proud, she's, proud to say we? doing this to make money, not because we care not for editorial purity, etc bumping into independent. It's about proving we can do business better than you, I love this because it falls into something I often see people who are too the weeds to see what's actually going on around them. You work for one site. The bosses are looking at all of the sites probably saying something like we already cell pizza over here. We don't need you making pizza while pizza business is doing great. In fact, all the pits you're making. Let's move it over amidst the analogy again politics, you don't need politics in your video game content or in your sports content, you don't you have a political site just for that

why are technology, gaming and sporting websites talking about media companies and politics well, We know it does better, but there's look. I know what food is the most popular you can look at grub hubs, statistics and I'll show you like pod tie and pizza are some of the most popular things order, great, but people still open sushi. Restaurants, you can still make money song a different product, but imagine if every time you did the Woke brigade said will make more money by doing woke politics. What we don't need that we have that already and here they go admitting it now. They absolutely still go into detail about too many white man and all that stuff. Just my understanding

We also have our information about Gawker, which are covered before Gawker is being now run a relaunch it. They ve shuddered at check this out. I'm not gonna, read too much into the story, but from the daily dot. Why can't independent feminist media websites stay afloat? Interesting question contrasted by the store we just saw now. Feminist is much more specific than general politics, but I will stress what, if the people of great help partners who bought this, companies can see that there is a short term gain from politics and a long term risk, and they ve seen stories like this from just the other day where these websites can't keep themselves afloat. Well, then, they're, probably going to say we need to diversify, but its mind boy. They come out and just say it it's not about at a total purity. It's about money, money money, but I got a few other stories they definitely to highlight. First, the MIKE thing that I mentioned is not even

all the news, this stories from July, twenty third, twenty nineteen- it talks about the exact same thing: they are talking about how these formulas for whiteness we're being pushed and in the end it did not work. To be great help partner, saw this story and said your politics or a short term gain, and they said yes, we're making money we're getting collects, but for how long might collapse, we know that they were pushing these ridiculous formulas. But I do have more. I wanna go through because there's been some amazing developments in media, notably how Tucker Karlsson is handling his business in the wake of a loss of advertisers and Buzzfeed and and and the times well before we jump into that dominant and with one final point, this woman, who wrote about wanting to make money and not being about idealistic journalism. Retro purity is now going to work for wired and we have the story from yesterday from the world. Was this double

Have you dare not familiar with what it is, but they say the media carousel around above who's been hired, fired or maybe just jumped ship and jumped ship in the media land recent I highlight this because they show several people who have gone other companies, and I can tell you with with personal experience. There are people who fail up all the time and media they get fired from one one job for doing miserably. Hired by another company now look I get it an industry, so they're only so many people working in it, but there's a problem. We have a revolving door in these companies. And someone can fail miserably and then get hired by another company, and I know people who have failed miserably that hired by the Atlantic in the New York Times there still failing miserably. Why higher these people got it? Perhaps they just don't know butter or perhaps it's an ivory tower pool of nepotism, they're all setting up top in their infinity poor, topped the ivory tower and whenever one person gets believe they say you can come over on my side and then you

de the story, someone absolutely willing to admit their not being driven by idealistic journalism. There are literally being driven by generating money and that's why well turn a sports website into a politics website, and then they go get hired by someone else check this out from Bloomberg Bit, this week. The sports new site, Haters loved Duncan, keeps signing up subscribers. The athletic now has has more than half a million readers, but can't but cannot turn a profit. Perhaps The owners saw this and said. Yes, we are getting views from politics, but look at these other companies that are sticking to sports there is a real business here that we need to go after. They can't see it there in the weeds and there they are their swimming in politics and they're gonna tell their bosses, they know better, will look man

don't like it, you can leave, but if somebody wants to launch a sports website, I'm not surprised the athletic is doing ridiculously well, and this is from Bloomberg just what five days ago, five days ago, now. Here's an interesting in the media landscape outside of all this work will move into Tucker Carlsson and something really really fascinating. I was recently watching Tucker show your ears. Here's a story from the rap Tucker Carlson's ads are down after he said that the White Nationalism stuff was a hoax, that it wasn't a real problem. I understand the point he was trying to make. I think you made it poorly, it's not a hoax. It is a serious problem but being inflated by people who are crazy case in point. We can look war war. You know, sensation on purpose or driven. Take a look at the Amazon Rainforest stuff. I covered this yesterday, according to the New York, times. The fires are normal part of agricultural cycles been going on for twenty plus years, it's not worse today than it was

five years ago- and it was substantially worth ten years ago- is it bad yeah without us up the deforestation, but everyone acting like it's the worst thing. It's not true, pucker Karlsson he's s eyes, but that the hopes and all its off the activists attack him. He was advertised. What does he do? This blue my mind? I was watching a show and all of a sudden it cut to commercial, but the commercial was Tucker Carlsson and he was saying basic We gotta, you know, got gotta Fox nation and sign up, and I said it's really funny because its literally what I do- and I I don't I don't believe I've done it yet, but I'll do it now I say: gonna TIM cast outcome, slash donate if you'd like to support my work, there's a paper electronic ripped off in a physical address, but here's the thing I do that in every video. That's my core promo, if you like it sign up and that that's a support, I need- and I am truly grateful but even took her karlsson- is doing it now. The New York Times the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, are pushing heavily into a pay while subscription model, even buzz feed is asking for.

No nation. I think this is the direction we're going, because advertising are pulling out. We want subscribers, and this is where it all ties together. Like first I'll say the activists going to talk about means, he's gonna keep pushing for subscriptions that's gonna work he's getting what's three million. What was it was less not crossing got three million viewers more than double MSNBC. More than double you get one percent to subscribe. And you're good for a while. Now Tucker show prior quite a lot of money, but here's where it all gets tied back together, Tucker Tucker knows he can drive you to pay a subscription to Fox nation to make up for the loss of revenue. Check this out. A sports new site has half a mill in readers, and they keep signing up subscribers. Subscribers are paying members right now this Bloomberg astride me to sign up and there I all story, but the headlines good enough, so there

we can see how it ties back into deadline. We don't need rage bait, we need a dedicated audience and that's what these people Don T and so we truly learn something profound from this article. It's it's incredible. Not only do they not understand business, they also are not driven politically, they want money and they dont get it. I will of great help. Partner saw this story from Bloomberg said this proves our point. We may lose overall numbers, but these people will pass monthly, is if I made a video where it was like you know, feminist does acts. Is someone Bene contribute they might? But what? If I do like you know, political coverage that helps explain the world is longer. I mean we're at twenty minutes nearly already a lot more people are gonna say I want to pay for this premium kind of. Content. That's very specific! I'm not super concerned about whether or not my videos gonna generally Million views take a look at the video I did yesterday. I talk about the Health of Ruth, Better Ginsburg, and I praised her for being. You know an honourable member of a Supreme court and

her well as she praised, but Cavanaugh I find the commendable. I know, that's not gonna get me a million views, I'm doing something I think is important, but it's also good business. I'm not going to make nonsense content. Just in hopes that I get enough clicks to get ad revenue know I'm going to make a content in hopes and it's something truly valuable and that you share it and it grows from there. You make a good product to the audience. Comes you make this woke rage, bait, nonsense and eventually people look real quick but, as I said last time, traffic is not an audience. This is signing up subscribers, that's money in the bank, because you can go. You can go to your partners. You can go to the board of directors and say we have a hundred thousand subscribers paying ten bucks a month were good and then you can be truly independent and not worry about the rage make, but these people are stuck in the culture work,

I stress this point. I know that my content is very culture war issue and I have a certain perspective. I know you can go to my to channel and see how I cover these stories. The point is: literally what my channel is always been its he's been in some form: cultural politics travelling or talking about issues and talking about the same thing, The videos I started on my may on this channel back in the day. We're me talking about top news. That's what I do news. I wasn't a gaming channel turned politics. I wasn't a magic, the gathering channel turn. Politics know I've always done news politics, culture, conflict, rice, etc. Sometimes I I'll throw in something it's not super relevant. I made a video about other no video in May, and I felt like I needed to do and I needed to send out the message I didn't do that. Well, dollar. Fifty thousand views, which is really

low for my channel by thought it was something that was important. I want to do. You can take a look at what they do it at these woke media outlets they're trying to get rage, bait views. Well, maybe people know the best thing. You can do what you can do watching this video is become a subscriber of my channel so that it can look to talk to my business and see I'm guaranteed ex revenue every month. I can project I dont, know vetoes gonna. Get views are not. I made a video about Ruth, better Ginsburg, and I said I wonder if people care. I really do. I really wonder if people care- and you know what it got- less views on average Alec half the views. I normally get the past month by two hundred and forty thousand views relative to Wales. Normally getting three hundred teeters around there, that's fine. It was important to talk about the issue and my channels, poet.

Now end with this point. Thirty two hundred people have lost their job so far this year and media landslide from just a couple weeks are from last month. This is a story, that's frequently updated, but I will stress the business models of yesterday. Dont work, they don't work accompany bought, gives MOTO awoke media company and they have a staff whose living in twenty thirteen obsessed with cultural politics and they're saying it doesn't work you ve, gotta, move on, we need subscribe first we need sports. We need to diversify our media network. Guess mono is all woken up like every single site right about the same crap, so yeah, I'm not surprised, they're saying stick to sports. We need to protect our business in the event the political stuff, doesnt work anymore and it probably won't and now we're seeing over, over again, there's one of the worst years for media we ve ever seen twenty there are Shane Psmith, see

a former ceo vice and the front who said like five years ago, there was going to be a bloodbath in digital media boy. Was he right and it's only getting worse? You need to change our business model and you can't expect to ride this wave of rage make forever. I know that I, but I'd make political com It's what I do. I ll leave it there truly truly amazing, as an element of thinking the comet seriously comment. Let me note thank share this veto. If you like it subscribe, if you like it, I'm gonna keep doing my thing for one reason I like talking about these issues. I like finding a story and then being like. While I need to talk about this- and it gives me a place to vent all these ideas and it happens to work well for it for a business and if at some point

Nobody cares Alice anymore, I'll, probably still do it just die fun doing it and you know what sub verse will grow and that's it. That's that's a core business and that's not gonna chase. After this nonsense of we're gonna get rage by clicks. Quite the opposite. We're going to produce a premium, you know, content on the ground, reporting legitimate news and hope that people are willing to subscribe to it. We're gonna continue to do better and better. So people subscribe for news, because a pang subscriber is better than a rage, baked click, and maybe these woke journalists should should recognise that stick around next technical becoming Youtube com. Slashed TIM cast news at six p m. It is a different channel and I will see you all. Their Donald Trump has accused the media of Troy to make his re election more difficult and many people you have been saying for the past week or so that all of this news about our recession is intact. Trying to scare people into triggering a recession, because one the only things that that one of the only thing that can stop Trump is probably

recession? That's why bill more has repeatedly called for it and, in my opinion, its gross but I do believe that at least Some element of the media absolutely is trying to stop Donald Trump. First, let me say this: there are overtly partisan news outlets that clearly state they dont, like the presidency. Of course, there are pushing a narrative, that's just what they do. There are left wing site. There are even right wing sides. I don't, like the president, so always see all of these outlets going recession recession over and over again a lot. It's coming from sites that say straight up. They don't want dropped to be president right, there's one others, does an Oracle from salon right talking about some like this about our research, while heart drop in, of course, they're going to push the narrative there very black pro Bernie One story about how their method Democrats are rang on the far left, but here's a thing. So we can look at this right. They are talking about trumps tweets and if we had a very we can see, it's just been an endless barrage of recession over

organ, but I want to show you something I want to show you some proof that I believe at least it pride some evidence that the media is whether that you have an agenda. You want to see some evidence. Let me show you some evidence check this out. I tweeted this out a couple days ago. Here we have two snippets from Tuesday Please I say above is a story from July. Twenty six below the story from July Tenth, both our from vice the first story said gabardine was a gabert but gabardine. Also it is already exciting, extremely online lefties liked him pool a prolific Youtube or who keenly rails on the political establishment to us more than one million followers across multiple channels. So listen. They know why I'm this,

better knows exactly who I am. They ve seen my videos. They know I read on the political establishment. They know that I'm a fan of Gabert and they called me a lefty, but take a look at this story from vice two weeks earlier TIM Pool a right. When media figure, who once worked advice news, tweeted an identical invitation to the same White House summit that mines received, Now you want to know why I think this is evidence. The media is playing a dirty game for one both stories, while their different but written by different people. Both stories show context. They know who I am, that I worked for vice news or they ve seen my Youtube gentle. So maybe it's possible. It's just their personal interpretations, but here's the thing. Why call me a lefty in the story about Gabert, because this story is Pro Democrat, meaning if my videos about

gabert, can entice moderates to vote for a Democrat, it's bad for Donald Trump. Now what about this other story, though? Ah I was invited to Donald Trumps, Whitehouse Summit. And they certainly can't say an anti establishment. Leftwing individual was invited to the summit, so they call me right wing and out right lie because it frame the narrative NBC the today show claimed that I was supporting the south rich conspiracy theory. Why? Because I said that the Fox NEWS story was likely not true. I kid you not the mere act of talking about it. They claim is pushing it and that's how the game is played. It is dirty little this too stories from vice news temples on the left, temples on the right, which ever one benefits there narrative. You can't have the temples gonna known it got going to translate. Our summit trot certainly wouldn't invites

one was an online lefty, but then wait. A minute TIM Pool is praising gabert. Oh, that's actually, good. We better call my left, you so people listen. You know what it's ridiculous game. And that's and that's how the game is played now I don't want to act like it may just be. There's two different people to different interpretations, but I gotta say: it doesn't seem like a simple solution to me for one? I have briefly, then, to the new vice building, but I don't know any it's been years, our four vice I so if, if Their offices are anything like they used to be these people are, they know, they know each other, we all knew each other right. It doesn't matter. If your writings, you know four, tat story or politics story. I'm really knows each other. How could you such my videos and then, like both individuals. Come to a different kind, vision when you're in the same office. Perhaps it's possible. Doesn't seem like a simple solution if they watch my very

they know I'm rather moderate, I guess, but this is the time to decide to be fair. Now truck tweeted before I arrived in full It's the fake. A disgusting news was saying that relations with the six other countries in the g7 are very tense, and that two days and at the two days of means will be a disaster just like they're trying to force a recession, they are trying to will America into bad economic times the worse the butter anything to make my election more difficult to win while we're having of we're very good meetings. The leaders are getting along very well and our country, economic Beware, you know what's wrong with, what's been really frustrating I made them it's been a few days ago talking about Trump world and how are trapped in the media is so obsessed like here. I am even outdo the video about I haven't. This is what this with the news. Is you trapped in it, the media is so obsessed like here. I am even now doing a video about. I haven't This is what this, what the news is? You go to Google and it's like every every day, the past several days recession,

over and over and over again nonstop, but there's no recession, nothing's happening. Why are we talking about nothing happening because they wanted to have? And in my opinion I think I agree with trumps assessment. There are people in the media that want to push the narrative because they want a self fulfilling prophecy. If you get enough people scared and they send an Take action than the market can suffer and they know Bill MAR has said it is an over and over again and means disgusting. They hate the president so much. They are willing to take the economy and hurt the working class hurt the lower class. That's enough they all rights. The comments from tromp came after a tumultuous week in which the tit for TAT trade war between the? U in China escalate further. The president on Friday triggered a drop in. U S, stock markets and ignited deeper concerns about an economic downturn. After calling on american companies to stop doing business with China

That's true and I do believe there are many fair assessment of the recession, but there's a combination of trumped arrangements. Interim like active participants in politics, pretending to be journalists and, yes actual you no consideration for you, know the trade war what it might lead to, but certainly this all so ridiculously out of proportion for what's really happening even can reproach outlet talked about how, even though the stock market was down amid talk of a trade war, it still way way way way. And then you hear people over and over again saying that the stock market doesn't matter for the american people and like hold on men. Juno retirement accounts work like people have stocks. People have for one case that that they have things that are tied to the market and those that those that that that is a massive. Ass, a voting block, so I want to look at a cop other stores before you do that I have to do the standard pro promo code. It's him casta com, slash done it if you'd like to support. My word is a paper locked in a crypto option, a physical added

but, of course the best thing you can do share video, because boy is, it saw it's been rough and is there d ranking independent local commentary, and will see how long it lasts. To be honest, you know what we see the game Google plays. I routinely rag on Google for four Moreover, politics there bias the links that have come out and I gotta say they're. Probably none too happy with me, so their propping up major corporate channels will see if we can not, we can pull through and and and this kind of content will survive on leading towards you. Tube is going to do what it can to stop this as began to talk, Twenty. They have no choice. So if you want help overcome that share this video, otherwise so be it. But you know the story from Busby NEWS: here's some actually useful information to help you prepare for recession. I think we're seeing something else. It's not, I don't wanna say like every single journalists or everyone in media is trying to trigger recession. I think what may be happening as well.

Is that a few key people are trying to trigger trigger a media sweep? So basically you write about a recession. Somebody clicks it than you start talking to people about it more stories pop up and you do everything your power. To shift the national conversation towards a recession to scare people, and I think this may be one of the things we are seeing. I believe a lot of it is it's a ripple effect like you get a few people who are over activists to want to stop Trump and they drop recession to the pool waves ripple outward and then everyone's rights, picking up the story and running with it, but I'll just stress I'll, just stress, keep like keep an eye out for stuff like this. This is the biggest problem with media. Today. What can you believe? Who can you trust- and I gotta say man not a day- goes by who the I can trust. How is it that we ve come to a point where vice right to stores than to each other call me left and right wing there that you know what man. What ever suits the agenda, and that's why I don't trust the media.

And this is probably why many people don't trust the media. Because of this. So when Trump says the media doesn't like em well. I have to wonder why there so much of this it up six poles, More than six thousand interview show trumps approval rating dropping. Oh, please dude. We always have to defer to the real clear politics average and well Its approval. Writing is has gone down a bit from its peak at the end of July. It still higher than it's been on: average for his entire presidency. Listen you you're not going to win its it's. It's like. I guess they have no faith in the democratic motorway. And I guess maybe I can't blame because look what's happening. It's it's a complete civil one Democrats I, with the left with with the moderate Democrats, fighting with the far left Democrats and look- I mean you ve got this is from believes from today. It's ok it's from five hours ago. They say when establishment Democrats attack the hard left

What are they really afraid of I'm afraid of people who are so ridiculously out of touch with America? There handing the election to the republicans- and I also think of dangerous and insane ideas and they're, not Democrats in I was taught into someone I've known, has been a lifelong democrat and they said these people like court as in centres are not Democrats, they do not represent the Democratic party. I agree. Bernie Sanders has always been an independent and he's running as a Democrat, because the parties most likely to win over the same you ever Donald Trump. I think Donald Trump could have run as a Democrat as a moderate Democrat, but he's billionaire Democrats not gonna, like two billion or so he ran on republican ticket and then pushed more standard republican, fair, to win over the voters, but if you let it gonna trumps, history he's always been kind of a moderate downwards and New York, liberal nice businessmen to so will be more conservative. But when you look at the New York Times Data you can see that under tromp their public and party has shifted slightly to the left in the in the language they push worth.

Democrats have gone nuts, but here's the point. They you see all these stories, six poles and more than six thousand interviews show pumps. Approval is dropping. Oh no, yes! and then you had over the real clear politics average and it's actually the last the last marker. It's up point, for it is up point four. As of that, the twenty. Fourth, so look, his approval. Writing goes up and down, and here that soon and will do well wait. For that one moment, work goes download buttons down trumps, a privileged take sharp drop blah blah. I've talked about how I see things in. Why frame things, and I think it's fair to two point out why I think it's incorrect to do what they're doing take a look at its disapproval. Trumps, Approval is down from what twenty seventeen December thirty point: seventeen and its average around the same place with some spikes and some drops, but, however trumps approval rating is averaging higher than ever. I'm not super concern with the disapproval. Writing that is every

lower than its ever that lower than it was two years ago, but I am interested in the fact that trumped up approval. Writing is averaging higher than it did two years ago right. So, if I was gonna talk about this I'd say trumps approval. Writing is higher as averaging higher two years ago. That's really really interesting. As we go into an election and its disapproval, is forging lower than where it was two years ago, which is really really interesting it. It's not interesting to me. One is approval when it goes down eight eight a couple points, but the we're. Just still high is uninteresting me that its disapproval has gone up a little bit, but it still averaging way below where he was when he started. These are these all improvements are not saying. Mostly one's country, like the guy, looks like accordingly averages. They don't, but the point is: what are you? What story is there? Is it every time seconds, I wanna come on back trumps. Upriver writing is down yeah and then it pops back up at its averaging slowly up up up it's, it's look: liquidity

his approval? Writing was what thirty seven and, on December fourteen twenty seventeen let's go back to the beginning of September. It was thirty eight point three. It is way hires favorability is up. So what news is that he's gonna? So so? This is why I say you see these stories, I dont think crop is wrong. The media is just for people in need and only the entirety of the media, I'll walk back. You know and pushed back on some of what trumpet sang but come on, How much evidence do we need to see tonight? but the media hates the guy you I did a video a couple days ago talking about Trump world and we can see that the amount of mentions in the press about Trump it's like triple or quadruple where o bomber was the same time. Why, while the Trump bumped they want, the rating but I think the people and media I mean look. I gotta say this to see it. As hired a torrent of former feds and CIA people who don't like the president and pushed Russia gate. Other nonsense. So yeah they don't want trump. Someone,

comes out and says he believes the media is trying to make us reelection more difficult. Yeah, I'm gone to go ahead and say I believe him to be my opinion. It's just when you look at the. It seems like it doesn't really add up. Now I dont think there's a conspiracy like people and media. But we do know that your times has talked about we're gonna talk about trumpet and racism in all, that's like what. Why is that your lead? Why can't the New York Times time about going on in Hong Kong? I mean they do they do but wise their focus just trump, so much more than it was for Obama. Why is what why would? I would not like vice call me then right wing within two weeks of each other, because clearly you can see when its talking about promoting a Democrat, even someone like Gabert you know, was not favoured by the establishment. It still good news for them, because it means moderate voters might vote policy because I probably will so they want to promote than say temples lefty. That's right! You can trust him, especially who talks about, tells you gabert

but then, when I go to that too, to two to the President's Whitehouse summit to talk with the problems of social media, then this phenomenon and he's right wing he's right wing and then two weeks later he's left he's a lucky. I love it. It's a ridiculous. And with no editorial standards, no fact checking. They have no idea there. Talking about. It is fake news, all the way down thanks Buzzfeed, Thanks are taught him out of recession thanks everybody else, and you know what don't be surprised that when the president says There's no way it's an accident that they do things like this. I certainly don't think the majority of meat he's doing it, but I will stress before signing off, certainly in some instance, as you can see some weird phenomenon where their zero editorial and so at the very least we either have a completely inapt media. Others collapsed with no editorial standards, or we have people who know what they're doing on purpose and there and they're playing up medical game stick around next segment were becoming up at one p m on this channel and I'll see you Ellen.

I am very much so an environmentalist I worked for three may be for environmental organizations to help protect the environment. I believe we do need to take action to reduce climate change, and I believe you have people like the ones supporting Gretta fund Burg. Who are disingenuous or just wilfully ignorant of what they're doing and they're not solving any problems. Nuclear energy, for instance, is a very smart way to reduce emissions. But what do we get? The green new deal wanted to ban nuke nuclear energy because they're not actually thinking about what they're doing and where they moved to. I mean like what comes next. I see this all the time. For many of these leftwing activists and its frustrating. It's like China heard cats. I'm telling someone, listen, yes, we can reduce emissions. But if you do that, you will make it worse. You are not solving the problem. You are just preaching empty platitudes and

aging and something that feels good, but does nothing? Ok, you're, not really frustrating. So first, I will commend Gretta thunder When I saw that she was gonna be taking a sailboat instead of flying. I said I put Europe suppose we know where your mouth is a lot of you, celebrities, offline, private planes and yachts, and so it may you know, as so AIDS you're willing to sail? Hey, that's great! Here's the thing, though it's not it's! It's it's going to produce more, carbon emissions. Her trip then actually just taken a flight. The thing about a plane is the other problem. Is volume not individual action? I commercial plane is, is built and it produces a ton of carbon building it, but then it can fairy people back and forth with a relatively low carbon footprint. I,

This photo from Gretta Day eleven very bumpy and wet south of Newfoundland, and I noticed that she's on this boat, with a bunch of technology, first of all, she's got plastics. She's got doc. You know synthetic materials, the boat itself, as carbon fiber in plastic, she's got plastic buckets she's got ropes, all of you things. Even even clothing, she's wearing require a ridiculous amount of transportation. So here's people into realise we're talking about a carbon footprint whenever this is going on. What the heck is essentially by saw this, and I said, ok, the components for the stock, we're probably shipped the country on gigantic. You know: freighters big boats producing a ton of carbon, the plastics tonic, carbon carbon fiber, everything they did to produce its just about producing a material, its transporting it to the manufacturing plants. All of this said to me it is ridiculous access. This is still not a solution. Listen not only that, but a pair

They say that it's not going to save any missions because of crew will have to fly back to fly to New York to sale, it back a crew, so she could just take it a round trip flight lesson A system is in place. It's it's not perfect. We need to do things to make the system better. That doesn't mean you go in and take a massive, expensive boat trip, which will likely, in my opinion, produce more emissions as considering every crew fly. It's all Oh just feel good nonsense. You can see everything she's got in this boat, all catering. What for one person? She's? Probably producing substantially more carbon emissions. This says to me the whole intent was a pr stunt to people who don't know how to put it, how to add one plus one plus one. You give em you given that feel good. She conservatives complained

they are on private plane, so Gretta will sail and then he's your left home like who clapping and cheering it's like yeah but come on man. Can we actually talk about the problems? No, we can't for two reasons one hears tweeted. I wonder how much carbon was produced in the craft thing of all the tax tack used by Gretta for this trip I spoke gotta run. Seems like it might actually be more than the cost of a single flight. As someone who is Environmentalist at has worked organizations and is concerned about the environment. Yes, I want to actually get to the root of the problem. I said nothing bad about. Brought up. I've, never tweeted and cheer on any other people will rang honour. I think it's commendable. She wants to sail. I just get silly and its fake and it's a pr stunt at its worst for the environment, and none of these people are gonna. Take two seconds to think about it. Look at the first response from Russia,

Malaysia to is fitted with solar panels and hydro generates, making one of the very few ships in the world allowing trips like this to be emission free. Did you read what I posted the crafting of the technology that interpretation of the materials to various factories, because gonna be important, export someone, mine one material can be sent here. It's going to produce a ridiculous amount of carbon crafting this ship. Your talk about sailing and being an emission free I would have preferred to see her chop some trees down much I'd be amended seriously to be a great agreed effort, chopped down some trees, manual, labor and then you know get Europe now put make your own twine and everything and make your own boat. The problem is it's too dangerous and if they want to be safe, they need modern technology which produces a ton of carbon emissions. So what's the solution, while I would say for now nuclear energy, a lot of

energy that we can use for transporting production. A materials could come from wind, solar, but more more likely nuclear, because the return energy investment for nuclear energy is actually really really hides very valuable. We do, lot of older nuclear reactors which are bad could be dangerous and we got it. We had a retrofit, we got a fixed or implement new or later designs, but to just see the stone. Ok, here's a bothers me! All of the replies from people are like checked. I look. I love this one this this comment that makes literally no sense that they always share this apple airports cost one fifty nine, but they can't pay tax. If every tax or decent wages to the chinese Factory workers post. You said on an Iphone gotcha car should have it should it should have seatbelts, yet you bought one hypocrite owned. We should improve society somewhat. Yet you participate in society curious, I am very intelligent. They post this because they can't add one plus one

Maybe that is, they see an issue and they can't think what comes next zero strata, it's like planet playing, a game with someone and they put zero points into strategy. Can you think about what comes next? Because that's how you solve problems? If you just go on, say: hey everybody gets about, and then you take all of this ridiculously expensive tech which produced way more carbon than a single flight would have cost, and the flight still gonna happen anyway. So it. Would you know what you're talking about carbon neutral take the plane. You know why the plane is going to fly back and forth, whether you're on it or not and will produce carbon emissions, so instead of buying all of this personal technology to cater to one person

just take the flight and have a conversation about fixing planes that didn't work week. We can't just snap our fingers in others. There is. There is a problem, it's possible. We are walking towards our doom, but I think that humans will adapt and I think that well well, I'm concerned that we we won't, but I'm hoping we that the market will change when things get bad, things will reverse, but I don't know I don't know. I really really don't. I think one of the answers Farmers paradox as to why we haven't had frozen unfamiliar means. Why have we discovered any intelligent life? Maybe that's once life becomes intelligent, it separates itself from the system that created it once you know. Human started understand how to make fire how to build things. They are causing environmental damage. It could disrupt a very delicate ecosystem possible humans could invent things to keep them alive, or it's possible that we, we ve developed so quickly beyond the ecosystems ability to adapt at the ecosystem itself may collapse, so human

absolutely need to be paying attention to how they impact their environment. The oceans are acidifying. Acidifying fisheries are collapsing. We ve got serious problems. Jellyfish are invading these now dying fisheries so people started eating jellyfish. Maybe things will change in that direction? I don't know, but I do think we need to pay attention to the world eleven, because people don't realize you are a part of the ecosystem. Your breathing, the air, so I'm very much concern about the environment when I'm not happy with is the people who can't seem to grow, a basic concept crafting the Tec not sailing on an emission free boat. They can't think beyond. They can't see patterns, it is, one of them frustrating things in the world, so I treated this the responses to this tweet, a remarkable when creating the plastics, electronics and shipping. The parts to have it constructed tonnes of co2 is emitted, Gretta may have been better. Just flying. But our friends don't seem to understand this. Someone responded that co2 is good because its reversing desertification,

I'm not gonna get and all that there's a lot of arguments to be made. The point is, I am not slamming gretta. I think it's commendable that is willing to sail to prove a point about flying, but also want to point out. It may be worse the environment too heavy personalized vessel for one person when you consider the plane was already going there. You know, and then people responding like two would make fun of her. She, if you took a plain now, wouldn't I never have come on we're all Dicaprio taken planes. I'm I may have mentioned something Al Gore and like ocean for property? That's different, sank, sea levels rising the thing about these celebrity private planes is that they have security issues for the most part. Now I personally think a lot of these people are just lazy and entitled and wanting their private plain find whatever, but it is important to point out we're getting a bunch of really high profile people, a private plain for several of them may make sense now makin it I'm not gonna talk about their yachts and giant mentions. In that regard, I will criticise them for that for sure.

Well, let's be real here. If we want to reduce carbon emissions, there is a simple word. We can say nuclear ok, getting on a personalized. Bout that may and that no emissions is fantastic but think about the amount, the amount of carbon. That will be a minute if we gave everyone about like this. Once again, all we see is the snooty privilege privileged elite giving us empty platitudes and tricking the masses into believing they're doing something noble. This is the next level of a private plain: it's a private boat with private tech. Yes, it is neutral, but beyond the private plain that these celebrities take to these meetings beyond like the carbon emitted from the fuel, think about everything they do the plane itself its construction. So, yes, let's be real here, commercial plans are gonna fly, no matter what you could just take that and the amount of carbon put into the world once would would would stay the same people dont think so so far

training that people are responding to my tweet being, like tomb, doesn't understand, ha he's making fun of but using an Iphone when making fun of apple you dont have to buy an Iphone there's the funniest things as what you partnership in society. This comical, it's just so so vapid. Is people can't count to to listen? you want a ragged apple by a Samsung? That's what I did and I I totally understand Samsung is still produced in Fox com laboratories. I get it, I get it, but apple. Is I dont like them? There are bad company, so I said you know what I will take one step in one direction to back what I believe is right and I switched to samsung- not a perfect solution, but if I'm going to criticize apple, I'm going to go to the company, that's parts from multiple companies instead of Apple, which does everything software hardware etcetera, is a lot of other problems with apple. Ok Beyond was making fun of apple airports and all that stuff and inject the prices theirs.

There's things out their software, I'm not getting into a never been a fan. So us I have an Iphone, and I said you know what I'm I'm not gonna use Iphone anymore. I'm an upgrade and switch to Samsung to make a point. I still participate in society. I get it. I still recognise that in these countries people are working horrifying conditions to produce these funds, but also recognize you can do at least one thing right. You can take a step in that direction, but this is not the point I'm making. The point I am making is that Gretta is claiming she's in a carbon neutral ship when in reality, the cost of that trip is so insanely expensive. The average person would never be able to afford this, so you wanna talk. A solution to the problem. This ain't it. This is not it now hopping over here to this website clean technical. They say Gretta funds,

Transatlantic sailing trip is seriously carbon neutral and they highlight the construction of the vessel. They say what are the carbon debt of the boat itself, its sixty foot, carbon fiber racing beast after all, whilst out the reality that they bought the whole second hand? Ok, that's that's! That's! On par with my argument about the boat, they didn't have the boat created so much respect in that direction. That is was was the right thing to do and thus does, on their part, dramatically reduce the emissions. The but already existed. It's a friggin argument. If you do not friggin as friggin our people who don't eat meat unless it was gonna, be thrown away. So it's like it's better to just consume it. It's not a health issue. Its more animal rights thing we're environment thing. So this kind of This is the right approach. I want to make sure I'm clear. Ok, that's the point on

trying to make an while showing you this. There was a second hand. Boat from a company that does try to reduce their carbon footprint. Is that if every person was gonna travel around the world, the way Gretta did it would increase the ceo too. That's the point. I understand she bought a second I commend her that she may still have been better off just flying, but it's it's cool. It's cool, I pay look. She deserves credit we're doing this, where all these other celebrities are flying for sure, but in the end a simple flight for cabana bucks may have been less. You know, emit less carbon emissions or bore her hold a lower carbon that then having a private boat in the end. What I think is the most important thing is that the average person can't do this. You are rich, you are funded, I don't know she's actually which herself, but this is a very well funded trip and very

going to me because it's always the rich people telling the poor people you are not allowed. You shouldn't be flying. You should be on about you can afford about with all can afford about. Boats are nightmare. Take care of people can afford boats, they gonna fly, you wanna go visit. Europe could honour bucks, I mean giving it if I to Europe for, like four five bucks round trip, You guys? It's it's tricky. Sometimes I think on average a fine seventy eight hundred, but it can be done and thus allows poor people to travel the world more important the point, the co2 emissions would be greater if everybody was riding around on their own little speedboats. You know what men I wish there could be honest conversation about strategy with with intelligent people who one actually solve problems. Instead, what we get are a bunch of people who don't understand anything and when I say something like crafting the Tec, where they do well her by her trip is gonna, be carbon neutral.

Yeah. I assure you producing. All of this is ridiculously carbon dense, it's all fake environmentalism. Nobody actually cares. You know. Bomber buys ocean front property. Al Gore buys ocean front property. If they really cared about this stuff, you would see him buying condos in Miami Beach, where the water levels are rising and are actually care about any of this. It's just a big political come. I do believe. Climate change is a serious problem. I've. I just think these people, really care they're playing a game to them. It's tribalism, its winning. You want you want! You wanna talk about actually solving the problem. We can start with it with one one simple word: nuclear

let's talk about something: truly carbon neutral. Instead, what do they say? They want to ban it. The green new deal. Would it's not? You can tell I get really heated about this because I do care about the environment. Absolutely I love nature. I hate deforestation. I'm gonna take my Van Gogh, drive off in the woods and kick back and just chill out by upon and just be in nature. I love it. I love the outdoors and these people are supposed to be the ones to funding it and once again, it's just pr stunts its pr stunt, no real plans and in their fans, defend them for tribalism. How many of you who are commenting on my post have ever actually done anything for him, not environmental organisation, some only but the answer as a big zero and I've worked for three I say may before, because one of them was about helping people be more sustainable and it wasn't it so it kind of once right, but a browser that three three may be for one was about providing food to areas so that

in learn how to do. It was like it was like food and sustainable education. So it's it's sort of environmental, the can teach people how to do sustainable farming and better farming and protects the environment certain ways, but at three absolutely so I ll leave it there I'll leave it there and these fake environmentalists who just want you want one, a clap in pet themselves in the bay can act like are doing something good you can you can do whatever you want, fine, but sure you're, watching the World Berne and they're laughing the whole saying we're doing good. Meanwhile, making things worse, when I ran on em over its that around next time, it will be at four p m youtube com slashed him gas. That is a different channel, and I can't you tell the environmental. Some soft gets me riled up I'll, see you there. It is now an incendiary comment to say that there are only two genders now. This debate is complicated because there are honest people

on the left side, who will say the idea of gender as a social construct built around biological sex, meaning it is technically and immutable that if it something that we just developed over time, we can make gender known for every want women don't need to address those men, don't need where suit etc. But then you start seeing the rise of tumblr genders where they literally just make up things that make no sense. One response in this debate: You see a lot of people. The right saying there are only two genders and is coming the perspective that gender and biological sex are intertwined completely, and so it is a complicated process. But no, I wouldn't say it: incendiary to make the claim. There are only two, because most people in this country would agree with that assessment. Now. There are a lot of people want to claim that, like there's a bunch of really weird stuff there, people claim that biological sex doesn't exist. I'm not exaggerating, that's that's true theirs, fascinating debate with Jordan, Peters and literally said? Ok, that's! That's where you get nuts, but just think

the one you want to say that its incendiaries there's only two genders. I'm I'm not seeing annex. I understand what someone means by that, but what about when job says there are three genders okay. Now this is from a couple weeks ago, and it so incredibly wrong, because here's the thing, even if you- two approaches from a left wing perspective. There are either infinity genders, meaning there's like none there are two which is the right wing side, but who, who said three Joe Biden who's, that there were three ok but you're not getting really crazy? I gotta admit you can't assume the average person understands the argument you're making about gender social, like the social constructs around the idea, of gender. You can't assume that, but MSNBC absolutely dies and treats it as though most Americans, believe there are more than two genders. They dont. So, let's read this story. I got another really interesting post that I wanna go through when talking about gender and how its this, this kind of rhetoric is being weapons used by the right to actually like

look it's? I guess you could say? It's not really being weapon eyes, but being highlighted so that moderates, who are Democrats are gonna, be like the left has gone crazy. Before we get started had over two TIM cast our council, I started if you'd like to support my work as a bunch of ways you can contribute. The best you can do is subscribe. Like comment interact share. The video to overcome that dumb de ranking. Also school is starting. Cyber bodies taken a big hit right now, so you know it is what it is, but here's, the washing and free Beacon, MSNBC, calls Republicans belief in only two genders incendiary what worldly live on. They say I mustn't be sea anchor Christine being referred to a Louisiana, Republicans believe they're only two genders as incendiary on Friday dancing

and her panel addressed the GEO Peas relationship with women and the algae beady community in the aftermath of the log cabin Republicans, a national algae Bt Group endorsing Donald Trump for a second term with an important question now dancing told yours: what does it mean to be a mainstream republican? It is the question that some Republicans have been asked, in the age of Donald Trump, and increasingly it seems the answer might be to make incendiary comments about women and members of the algae BT community actually tromp as the first president. In? U s history, to support gay marriage before getting elected. Not even allow It's true, I say in Louisiana. The republican candidate for Governor Ralph, Abraham is out with a new tv. Add this week making incendiary comments about gender, oh heavens, Ralph Ralph, Abraham, using the european nomination to challenge Louisiana Governor John Bell, Edwards released a tv add where he lay out a series of his conservative positions, among them his

medical assertion. There are only two genders: here's the truth. He said life begins at conception. Government is too big Our taxes are too high and our car insurance is too expensive. President Tromp is doing a great job facts matter more than feelings. The second amendment is self explanatory, and as a doctor I can assure you there are only two genders. I got through an argument with a guy recently about biological sex. Now, listen. I understood and the argument about gender and essential construct, but let's be real. Biological sex is a thing. It exists in almost every single life, their sexual, a sexual. We get it there it like, So I was trying to this guy and I said listening there are two biological sexist any got mad start yelling at me. I could do and any says, no there's not theirs. At least three innocent wait, wait, wait for real. What are you talking about three? The components of by it's cool life as we know them. Today, it's a sperm and an egg. It's the sperm to fertilize the egg, all I'm unblock, I'm, not a biologist. I'm not gonna get into great detail, but I'm pretty sure,

Maybe I'm wrong. My understood is. There are two components like could you imagine if the sperm onto the egg and then you waited for another thing down, were no Chagall, it may That's true! I'm not a scientist odyssey this based on my general. We're standing. There are two. I dont know why this controversial, there's no third gender walking around you know mean like there are men and there are women they have. They both have two different types of genitalia. Body and secondary sexual characteristics. There's no three, that's really weird, and it's getting really confusing that people are Joe Biden and the media is claiming there's more when there's not there's not MSNBC says not. Its controversial ocean that gender, as opposed to sex, exist on a spectrum, has gained credence in recent years of progressive, send money, algae BT activists. Now this is an

idea that exists outside of biological sex and I'm and I get it- I get it right, but you'd understand were in the territory now where even the left is acting like gender insects are the same thing. They ve totally walked away from the core of what the argument used to be, and other literally saying there are more than three biological sexes and I'm just like what Some presidential candidates are even listing their preferred pronouns on their twitter page Elizabeth, worn friends, identified as a says female or the pronouns she hers since gender or first people identifying with their identifying their gender with their birth sucks. A transgender person at their head identifies the opposite. Frock sex from which they were born will hold on hold on. If there's three genders than what you mean opposite. That makes no That's your incorrect! So I was talking to a more conservative, leaning Trans individual. I asked about this, and was told that they were did they find it just can darting, there's all these different tumblr genders because someone who is train

gender is literally trying to be the other agenda. Right so somebody was born female and, as a transgender male wants to transition to being met, you know a man but taking hormones or or getting surgery or something if there were infinite genders, then what are they trying to say? to the other argument. That's brought up often is, if you know What makes someone a man or woman is a social construct. Then why would someone need any treatment at all to be trends that could literally like, like a guy, could literally put on addressing claiming a woman and wouldn't need any kind of treatment? All this? It makes no sense it did make. I have no idea, what's going on me more, so you know we heard Biden, I don't even know where it's a number of Uncas and New York, this thirty to thirty one genders. I think maybe thirty, two and thirty one I don't wanna one of those, but so where did three come from? If I would, if you're gonna pick a number, don't pick three like him, he's like three guessing but anyway check this out. This proposed on right. It called our flash social engineering people think so

engineering means like a government trying to minimise the public. It most really does not. Social engineering is like an individual. Manipulating the behaviour of another individual till I gained something or control them its human hacking. So you can technically refer to major massive population manipulation of social engineering, but for the most part it refers to how you convince an individual to do a thing. There's one really funny videotapes. Said where these two guys say. If you're carrying a ladder you can get in anywhere, and so they walk and like movie theatres and museums and people open the door for a ladder. You must be working, you let him in they sumac. We must be doing something, so you can Caroline. I always tell people carry a bag of ice with arriving you're back pocket and you'll get let in any you wanna, get to a bar or calibre venue bag of ice. Your shoulder arriving your poppies, excuse me, and if they try and stop you been working and then walked seriously nobody'll. Stop you! That's what social engineering usually refers to balance out from

fourchan, it's as if we spread this image and similar messages around the internet and claim how horrible it is of the majority of straight men will not direct date. Trans people, they say, I have to push normal moderates towards the right to get the leftist onions Thrall that shall pass for men to start dating tradesmen for our own amusement, watch. The media further damage their credibility, trying to defend this and they say the image fight bigotry. Ninety eight percent of straight men are unwilling to date, Trans woman because of hatred. This has to change. Its act true. This is not made up. Look at this from a year ago: researchers, asked says people if they would date, Trans people there were the results on the start. Subjects are bleak what's because they found that, like even eighty seven to ninety percent of people wouldn't make someone who's trends yeah, I have a preference. So do

other straight men and other gay men and women and gay women, people have a sexual preference. How do we get from the point where we were telling people that you can? You know some like its age, you're born that what you're born get you know, magistrates, Romano measure to one they were born that way. We must accept them to now, literally being like its bleak that straight men don't want to have a relationship with another biological mail, and they argue but a transmitted. Is therefore not hold on, like do people realize many women smell different and that sums attraction is heavily predicated on smell. Now it's true, they argue but a straight guy might see Trans woman, whose very very attractive in passing and then feel like tricked or trap when they realized actually a biological male you're not likely going to find most people as they did attracted to the same sex.

Nowhere, it would be like telling a gay man. He should date, a biological woman, otherwise he's a big. It makes no sense. So this is where it's like everything breaks down right, we're told our whole our whole lives. We have to respect the algae b to community because they can choose who they love. And I say: ok, like I agree with that. I know people who are you know, algae BT. In all that, but now they're telling straight people than to date that the same sex, otherwise you're a big it. So look it's it's funny, because this fortune, drugget joke, is trying to claim it's an operation when in reality, you actually have vice writing this article, the sun. The study of the subject is bleak bleak, wheelchairs, people love who they love is like. Isn't things in it? Isn't everything getting nuts I'll tell you what man this is gonna push,

moderate, so the right hands down hands down anyway. I've got a couple more segments coming up for you in a few minutes stick around and I will see you all shortly. Taylor Swift has been getting pretty pretty political and I think it's gonna said it's really sad for a lot of reasons. For one tell us what has no idea what she's talking about don't listen to these a man, I'm not a big fan of celebrity endorsement for the most part by you know it's a complicated issue most libraries have there's no reason their opinion should hold weight in news in politics there, just famous for protein to be someone else on a screen or for singing. Now, some of them might actually be smart right, like the guy from the offspring, has got a phd in like microbiology or something and I think the dude four March against the machine has a political signs to hear something so that I understand you know when you're when you're super into politics, but Taylor Swift. What does she know right? Taylor, Swift will quote, do everything I can to end Donald Trump.

Autocracy. The lover sing writer regret sitting out of the twenty. Sixteen election will a few things first, how sad is it that you can't escape the culture war? you don't man, that's why keep saying that something! Bad de escalation is inevitable that there will be conflict when Taylor Swift someone is famous as her gets involved in the culture war, there's no escape she's, gonna start radicalizing. People and people are gonna, start going crazy, but I want to stress this point check out the story. Stop sharing that Instagram Hoax celebrities, fuel viral post that claims Instagram, is changing its rules. Plebiscite use your photos as firm and says: there's no tricks. Supposed. You may have seen this fake trash being shared around by celebrities. Yes, it is fake if they dont forget to Morrow starts a new insights. Moreover, they can use your photos and what they can use your photos already to read the terms of service. They use your photos for ads and things like that. I'm right through it. So don't call me fact check that I may be wrong.

Point is somebody shares this stupid chain letter. And then all of us on these celebrities are sharing it. Why am I gonna? Listen to anything you have to say about politics when, when you fall for these boomer means, I remember like. You get that these new chain, letters in the mail, like you, get a letter on them: oh and I would say something like if you don't share ass. You like you'll, lose money, your how you'll go bankrupt and it's like right this letter to ten people. Otherwise your face misfortune, People get superstitious and do it like commanded, just throw in the trash, ignore it and then one email started at the changes they kept going. There were chamber, Gmail Bang like you have received this email, because swine scene, if you dont send that your face great misfortune. Now we face the same thing: none of the world. It is that this phenomenon is the same thing. These. These celebrities sharing this fake news garbage its note. And any other chain letter and Taylor Swift, gobbling out mangled talking points about how she does. Like the Orange man is the same trash but it goes around and says you better

this or else, and then someone else does then finally gets Taylor. Swift and everything's is falling apart, because people dont not a separate fact from fiction Why don't blame in this assembly? The media is trash, but let's read the story about Taylor Swift before we diving had over two TIM cast outcomes: life done it. If you'd like to support my work as a pay pal option a critical option on I'm sorry crypto option. A physical address, but the best thing you can do is shared this video to help overcome the de ranking that Youtube is plant. Independent, local, material, propping, up, CNN and all those other big corporate players. So if you like me, please share a Threed, no longer content with being excluded from the narrative of actually say the narrow Taylor Swift is taking on Washington, or at least the autocratic leader blithely scream tweeting commands from his most famous house where democracy, at least we're supposed to be where you are,

loud disagree, descent and debate uh. That's really interesting, because I'm trying to put an event right now, why I'm sponsoring an event, and it's actually left wing activists who are trying to shut it down. I thought didn't, others say we're democracy and were allotted disagree descending debate, apparently not swift, told the guardian of Donald Trump and her intend to get more political and twenty twenty. I really think that he thinks this is an attack As you know, I think you're a dumb young person whose sharing another stupid trash me and you have no idea what's going on now, look tell us of his absolute, not mind my saying she should not just saying don't, listen to them Don't listen, celebrities and actually to a great We don't listen. Me fact check what I'm saying do the research for yourself and make sure you're getting a healthy news everybody slinging garbage all over the walls and it's hard to know what the hell's even happening anymore. They say, of course, of course, swift President of the Trump White House, is no secret. She's spoken out on

range of algae, BT, Q plus issues over the last few years and openly. Committed some regret with not publicly endorsing Hillary Clinton. She confirms. I was just trying to protect my mental health. Not read the news very much go cast my vote. Tell people devote, she acknowledged, a cancer relapse for her mother was reportedly weighing on her among a range of other issues. I just knew what I could handle and I knew what I couldn't. I was literally about to break. Well, somebody gave you bad advice, Taylor, I'll, tell you what you have a lot of fans. Tromp supporters and conservatives and now you're, going to make them angry get woke though broke. There was no reason to get political. None. Don't know what these companies do this you have every reason to stay out of it now. For me, I cover politics. I talk about new, so course. I will be here, but why is Taylor Swift? Look? Ultimately, the bad news is that Taylor is a high profile. Individual,

and this is going to radicalized a bunch of her fans and now we're not going to build up like you know what I've talked about, how this infects everything people say like you. Woke, or your red pelt and people will comment on my videos and be liked him so close to getting repelled. Balconies talked about none on another, listen when the culture war started. It was mostly about gaming issues and social justice, but the social justice woke, regressive stuff has been spreading to other industries, and this is the best example of that it is at the top of music. Now, Taylor, Swift, one of the most famous celebrities and music, is now espousing culture war trash which me there is no escape it from the top down is infected every layer of our culture and it won't go away. Trump is not. The cause of this crop is a symptom. A lot of people voted form because they were tired of the spread.

Of political correctness and it's only getting worse, which is why I believe trumps gonna win. Well, that's very little bit more swift believed her public image would have made her something of a hindrance but she's the past that, in the interview she draws particular attention to a republican led efforts to ban abortion Tennessee by way of a bill that redefines fetal viability. What's which Swift vowed to fight. Obviously, I'm pro choice. She said she claimed her intends to do everything I can for twenty twenty adding. I just can't believe this is happening. We ve been happens all the time. It's politics, back in June, Swift also published an open Instagram letter to Tennessee Senator Lamar Alexander calling for U S a passage of equality at which would protect algae BT, Q, people from discrimination in places of work, home schools and other public accommodations, and it will- and I agree with that-

But people are paying attention to what is also going to do. It will also allow allow biological males to compete against biological females, in which case I gotta say it's really. Weird. Feminism was built upon biological females being held back because of stereotypes in discrimination and in many ways this has to do with the fact that men tend to be taller stronger and more aggressive, making it more difficult for biological. Emails. Now the sun we have. This laws can be passed, that's going to reassert biological males rights over biological females in certain circumstances, I not arguing necessarily against it. I'm sorry, you know maybe should be. We know river revise to make sure that protection there, but we apps but we will see more biological males being allowed to compete against biological females and you'll see a lot of people. The Trans Rights community argue that it's not true its vague, no, no oh no, now they are even scientists to our transgender saying that there is a massive advantage. Biological

Wales will have its not argument understand how is up for debate at this point. What One thing everyone always says is going to a room of people and tell everyone to line up from policy to shortest and get it you'll find typical. You'll find most men on one side and it goes down to most women because men tend to be taller, but the equality ACT, something clearly tell us that doesn't know anything about and she's just spewing empty platitudes? It's what it's. What I see somewhat on the left and it's annoying. You know why, because I'm to advocate for a lot of these things right, I believe there are good social justice policies, but when the people behind it behind environmentalism, don't have any idea what they're talking about well, what are we supposed to do how are we supposed to actually make progress when we have a vapid unfolding shallow and ignorant activist group pushing the cause? They say the letter also contained her first major rebuke of Donald Trump. Adding. I personally reject the president's stance that this administration supports it,

treatment of all way? What you're saying Trump shouldn't do that or you send you disagree that that's actually the case this time, around swift seems more open to calling out demonstration and its leader chick accused Trump of gas lighting, the american public image into being like, if you hate the president, you hate American, why she just lives in a weird wacky, Wally world of sorts, but less Can I just stress this? This has been going around from around you know our who turingi fence in is, or can I know, pink, is but I've seen people show is even though some like a politician who shared it, it's just a boomer mean, but these people fall for this stuff. So I stress man, do you think pink knows anything about politics, I really doubt it. You probably know some stuff, but it s even protests, press health problems, and this has been proven to be fake. What makes you think publishing an image? is a legal contract anyway thing about this. Not only Are they sharing a fake meme which shows but don't you research, they actual

we believe this is a binding contract which would protect you in terms of service in a lawsuit, wow and then the common lecture us on politics. This goes for everybody. I don't care from the left or the right. Ok, the point is stop listening to celebrities. We got another story coming up in a few minutes about Brian stouter and I'll get into that too. I can tell you who to listen together No one's gonna deepened, but I cannot, but I won't least say this: the people who are King Boomer means and fake news are the last people even beginning or political advice from here we go. What is this? Governor pair even shared it, they say, even you, secretary of Energy, Rick pair you oversees the country's energy supply and nuclear safety fell for it. What you know I'm was invaded humanity. I got one more. Climate coming up in a few met. Stick around. I will see you there in It may be one of the most in saying things. I've ever seen or heard on cable television, Brian Stout there had a man on his show who claimed that Trump may be responsible for many more millions,

deaths than Hitler, Stalin and MAO. While an spelter said nothing and just let him go on and say these things, this comes not after a woman, MSNBC claimed tromp was talking about exterminating Latinos. These people have lost the plot. They are there so far beyond where Alex Jones even went to now. Look, I know out Jones thoughts about weird cell towers and animal human hybrids and all that other stuff, like eight ok, get it, but I'm talking politically. So let me clarify that that pass statement Alex Jones set some pretty wacky stuff for ashore in terms of its political rhetoric about Trump and globalists I'm gonna, have the lean towards this, at least on par with the with the with the absurdity and the can end the conspiracy nonsense they claim Alex Jones is guilty of so Ross highlights this. He does show Salter's response I'll get to that, but I want to go through the news of what's happening first, so we'll Chamberlains response was:

Fifteen years ago, brine Spelter would have been fired on the spot for this stunt. What did he have? Well, here's the thing from Yahoo NEWS. They say, CNN, Brian Stelter. We can't tiptoe around trumps mental insight. Melody anymore Brian. That was a terrible segment. I understand you addressed but seriously dude see CNN and Amazon BC are so far off the like. They lost the plot completely I'll even aware they ve got this point. Is it a joke? What it's worth stroke done? No for real, like you can call it bad fine he's on track. The like do the same things: Obama did. These people have lost it wire you entertaining these guests at all? How you're going to say that you can't tiptoe around drops mental instability more and then to have this guy on the air whose outcome like chop, doesn't done anything like this. Men. The media is real trash, I gotta say, and we all know it there's a story going around where it says

six month: old girl and critical connection after being apprehended by Sea BP, and it's like yeah but she's in critical condition because of the trip not because of sea BP, and women irresponsible media it doesn't care. They just don't care at all. Look earlier today, my segment was was about this. This woman, who worked for I woke me up they sang, we're doing this for clicks. We are doing it for money, we're not doing it for editorial purity. They said it was the story of idealistic journalists know they are doing their injecting he's weird political stories because it makes money it's business. But it's insane and irresponsible to have an MSNBC woman claimed trumpets too but exterminating Latinos and then bring a guy on tv who claims trump, maybe responsible for more, doesn't Hitler Stalin and now are you nuts? The combined totals are like two hundred million paypal what'd. You know what CNN they ve saved the shock to such a ridiculous degree. What's real, oh, but about this, and then I do it,

Joseph there's response, they write the form. Chairman of the cycle of Psychiatry Department, a Duke University claimed on CNN. That Trump is as bad as the worst dictators of the twentieth century and that its presidency might lead to even more deaths than they did. Look man, I'm not going to act like it's, not in the realm of possibility, in the sense that it's like based in physical the physical world. But what are we talking about a point? Zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero, zero one percent chance Trump ever becomes anything like those people. It's ridiculous. The worst things about Trump ART is: is that he's a blow of eating boorish blowhard that that's really it he's? He's got a bad attitude and if any any, sometimes wishy washy. Whatever you know you can you can vote, the Tories around the corner. You're allowed to vote. Will he went that's your own fault for propping up this insanity. You know people talk about trumps, approval rating being really

yeah. I'm aware the Democrats at man, because I think their approval writings higher than trumps and that's a thing. They'll pointed trumps. Approval rang and built. Look how low it as he can't when. If the Democrats approval writing is lower than trumps, yet he can three more while debating the merits of having psychiatrists come out with possible mental health diagnosis Trump doctor France said it was an insult to the mentally ill to compare them to him. Yeah, I'm not gonna. Readers quotes, but he said it's wrong to do it because it will stagnate the committees, the mentally ill, and it ignores the fact that everyone in this country is just crazy for voting for him. Now that I can get behind, you know every This country is not, as have other crazy. If that were reaching this fervent point, where P Oh absolutely are saying: they're gonna vote for tromp, as as an effort to the system, Michael more set it and he spot on when he said, people are going to rise up and vote for trumpet twenty. Sixteen, as the biggest f you to the establishment, he was right now.

Think, Michael more knows, his basis, split, which is really interesting. Michael Moors base was like white working class people, while the union's don't like the green new deal for the most part and the union's, don't like the abolishing I've healthcare so now you're losing your base. So, Michael more now The far left uneven. What's gonna that but anyway many p, We'll know they're not voting for normal, see their voting for something else. You can call it crazy and in any sort of like an hyperbolic sounds like not litter like figurative. You know, like everyone's has gone so nuts, that they're, like we're work were piled stops. I just don't see you know. First of all, this is an incorrect. It's ridiculous! How they'll go on tv and say oh trumps, knots and they ignore Hillary Clinton being set. They'll say Donald Trump is mentally ill. We can't ignore his mental instability and when people make comments about Joe, right and it's like all come on all he's. Just he just sir. It was a slip of the tongue, know Joe Biden out there man,

People were noticing that hell, I content kept coughing and following this and she's not sick. What do you mean and then finally admitted it? You can see. Other media plays a double standard. Well, it's let's job over to. What's Brien's help how brains out their responded. So Folio Rosa stouter responds to people asking what he did not interrupt Frances after the line, and I got to say its roof so the Reagan battalions as how didn't you fact check him right than in their brains, Delta Trot may have killed more people than it learned. Mile twenty to forty, five million people were killed in the margin. Hitler was responsible for the deaths of more than twenty million people. The segment is shameful. Spelter responded. I agree that it should have interrupted interrupted after that line. I wish I'd heard him say it, but I was distracted by tech difficulties. That's why the show open didn't look the way it normally does. I had two computers at the table etc. Not hearing the comment is my fault. I gotta say I'll, I'm I'm Goin toss for me on this. One

I dont think Brian as a bad guy, but I think he's segments are becoming increasingly unhinged, as we ve seen here, he had on April April Riah think your name is she's the woman, whose boy bodyguard assaulted that journalist. Ok, let's I got the narrative. We hear from cable tv, the anti Trump Orangemen bad stuff that Trump rallies are becoming increasingly dangerous for journalists, have we see what do we see like Gemma, castigating flipped off some people, yelling at journalists yeah, you shouldn't. Do that What have we seen from CNN the body art of assent on contributor, actually physically grabbed guy like stole this stuff and then we'll get a better. I think the guy was charged with that. Physically removes and from a building your talk about whose creating a danger of the press, More evidence. Cnn is doing that. Look man, I think Brian Stelter is willing to engage in an honest conversation. I'm glad here,

grasped. This burning is time to take a deep look within an end and we are doing segments tiptoeing around trumps instability. I gotta say when you don't do that for Hilary or when you dismiss it it's painfully obvious what you're doing CNN is so desperate for ratings. It's just its bit. Planes day. There was a story I cover not too long ago. A couple days ago. About our Fox news online is gaining on CNN about our Fox NEWS, dominates cable rating So CNN has begun sharing stories. They think Fox viewers like and putting a fox emerging next to it because they know when you start doing that. I gotta also this.

Good on CNN, for recognising that they ve gone the the deep it? But then, when you see like you, you ve yourselves, pull yourselves back from the edge man, because that's where you are, I love how people say that, like I've changed and that my content is like pandering hold on talking about, I changed. I show all the graphs all the charge on the left. Go, not the deepened and their quotes from me and twenty twelve sang the exact same thing. I say today: I've always been critical of the media. I've always been critical of the black block. Far left, you noticed, arrests- and I still am today my opinion- hasn't changed. The only thing is those crazy people are now working for CNN their work for the New York Times there being raised and promoted by sea and staff. See an understanding on the edge after I got, attacked react by Wall Street MSNBC. Invited me on the air to talk about it and can

Damn the violence today you have people at CNN. Acting like Anti Theo was Chris Cuomo positive image: words that anti fascist, arming the beach and of world war, two soldiers, freedom tunes- has a great cartoon. That shows makes the point. If you took soldiers from World WAR two and brought him to today, they would be freaked out. In fact, the left would call them nazis. So here's the plan trying to make about brine, felt or a saying about the. People is having on the air. I dont. I lean towards not believing his statement about tech difficulties to seem strange because CNN, increasing the is embracing this insane rhetoric insane and Anne and MSNBC did basically the same thing. They are standing up on tv screeching as hard as they can that the Orange man is worse than Hitler. I could you not. He may be responsible for more deaths, and Hitler. Cnn literally ran that segment. There they ve got they ve lost it. They ve absolutely lost the plot.

So I can only say that when I see all of this rhetoric, I can't imagine Trump losing. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe I'm wrong it, but if, if the ratings desperation is there and that bad, the media's and serious They are scraping the bottom of the barrel so hard their pawn of woodchips. That's how in saying things have gone, and you know what is going to lead to escalation, because people believe this stuff stealth or didn't address it on the urgent call this out. He admits he should have too bad? You didn't do it you, let this rhetoric go the same thing for MSNBC woman she apologizes later, but so what already went out and people are gonna believe the insanity, and then we see what we think we're gonna see. We're gonna see violence because of this, so you know what

I do keep a second story? Leave it there stick around next time. It will be tomorrow at ten, a dot m podcast everyday at six hundred and thirty p dot m thanks for hanging out I'll, see you all next time.