Last night for a we talked about Mark Zuckerberg, ignoring a subpoena and subpoena advocating policy genes works, dreamily, angry and in a show of good faith. I was I was holding back my anger. There was What I wanted to say so really quickly we are now. getting this supper side up and running. We have the long for, article or long ish. Article was along form on talking about soccer, what's going on companies and second, what right now the news is there was The committee happening in Canada, which involved people from other countries, sucker org and shall Sandberg worse subpoenaed to appear, and they didn't, and at the here bring. There were two empty chairs. Now had a public policy, I believe, or Canada showing up and the complete and utter disdain for you know for the four politicians for the government for the rule of law. Infuriates me, but apparently now there they, they could possibly vote on a contempt of court at bottom,

They are one of the options and we have the story from the hill, but there is more a former face look invite stay. A facebook investor is saying Canada? I believe Canada should shut Facebook down if they refuse to be held accountable. Mark Zuckerberg doesn't care what is platform is doing in other countries, and I think this Irene really do not like Facebook and do not like Soccer Burke. I think he is flawed. The law and he's having a here we have detrimental impact and I think this is an outright ban. Creepy guy just my opinion, I think facebooks trash. so we'll start with this right arm. He could be held in contempt literally ITALY is facing potential jail time now. That means you know what what has happened first years ago to Canada than you refuse as the summons, they could put him in jail just now. They would have to hold a vote on it, but he did ignore the subpoena My understanding is that he's done it before so he's ready? when we get started, but it's him

a council. I started if you'd like to support my work. There's a monthly donation, optional, crypto currency option, a physical address, liking, common ensuring the video do the best to help, because that's how you to figure things out, I guess so. Here's the story mark more. I will start with the hill. Zuckerberg could be held in contempt of canadian parliament, thus ache and condemned of court canadian Parliament if he continues to, No requests from Clayton lawmakers to testify before their government, canadian, conservative, member of parliament, Bob's Emerson, Tuesday, canadian lawmakers voted Tuesday to issue an open, ended summons for Zuckerberg and their chief financial Sir Cheryl Sandberg, meaning the two face summons to appear before the parliament the next time they step in Canada. If the exam It has failed to abide by those summons canadian law acres would vote on a motion to hold them in contempt of parliament. So they say if approved, that motion result in jail time for the powerful executives.

oh, it is unlikely. It would play out that way. So I definitely don't want to here's. The challenge over sensationalize and make it seem like there actually gonna come and arrest. Sucker burn at the same time I dont want to bury the lead we cover the store yesterday on sub verse, and we did I believe we did have a pretty good job trying to be right, there are. No, not you know. The goal covers, isn't too to sensation, you. Don't like this, so it for me I'm reading the story that that we put out and I'm reading it s very dry and straight news, and I'm really really angry the whole time, because it's not just about the fact that Mark Zuckerberg ignored the subpoena, but it's that he doesn't seem to care that Facebook is Emma Jane to all of us, but it doesn't care, he doesn't care. He doesn't care that foreign, countries are saying: do you are causing serious problems and you need to come in talk to us and it just doesn't show up. One of

or interesting things about? It, though, is in the store we covered the sky, I believe as his lesson Mcnally, what's his first name on an extra, I find the the quote properly. So, let's yes, Mc Mammy, venture capitalists, Roger Mcnerney, told the committee. If your goals are too protect democracy and personal. Ever you have liberty, you have to be bold, you have to fort a radical transformation of the business model of internet platforms. At the end of the day, though, the most effective path to reform would be to shut down the I forms at least temporarily any country can go. First, the platforms have left you no choice. The time has come to call their bluff, while aye aye man. I agree and I really really agree: it's a challenge But it is a challenge because everyone's got compete interest in what Facebook is and what it is doing, and I think

one of the challenges is that in foreign countries like Canada, they want to regulate speech. I don't agree with it in in the U S, they are regulating speech and can't because our shouldn't be because the first amendment, so what Facebook becomes, is going to be different for each country and that's probably the way it should be if you live in Canada and they makes speech illegal. Well, that's your country and got figure things out. I think maybe I think free speech is is a fundamental right. You have a right to speak right I point this out my video about the world. It's called the walls, Cronan fair. You want how about what rights are if you're in them of the woods with a broken leg drinking from a stream. You have a right to speech of a right to freedom of movement, freedom of expression. You can do your thing unimpeded, but don't have

care. You dont get welfare like no. You literally it's on you, so we cannot about what rights are the point as some countries? Don't don't don't an act that way? Well, you know what that's their countries, that their country and and what can we really do about it? I think it's gonna get to people in Canada to fight for that. but it seems like her. It's it's a losing battle, long story short. If we say that Facebook should be shut down by these countries, to enact and enforce their laws than Facebook will basically have no choice but to either abide by the rule of law beneath the government, not above it, we'll be shut down, and so you know the way I see Facebook with that their there, their users It is on the decline, at least as it pertains to young people I'm over it. You know, delete Facebook was funding and the reason it was trending on Twitter is because Denmark that's where mad. There was a video about Nancy policy that made her look bad I'm thinking. I'm like you know what absent

We know you should be allowed to play these videos, but whatever for the reason that people are saying delete Facebook, I'm like I do it. Facebook needs to go, twitter needs to go about these social media sites. Is that their completely unaccountable they view themselves above the law above our culture above social norms, and they flaunt it. Look at you know with what the then. Why get really really angry about all? This is because I literally sat in front of Jack Dorsey an end vagina God. I and we talk about these issues and they say all these. They they say all these things. There fancy words and lies. They acknowledge some of the issues and they act like it's our role to be the arbiters, the heralds of true superior morals? You know Jack Georgia as we want to promote a healthy conversation. What does it mean when it doesn't mean anything mark Zuckerberg? he ban certain people, it hasn't been other people, it's all just pr, and then When you have an actual country like Canada saying we need to talk about. What's going on

because Facebook is causing problems, are not being held accountable, guess what Zuckerberg don't show up. So I find it absolutely fascinating Mcnally, this investor actually pointed to Sri Lanka, the censorship. So so here's the thing in in the challenge of whether or not we should shut Facebook down, it's an issue of private business rights. Each case. I do kind of lean in terms of speech communication and private businesses. They shouldn't really be. shut down, but that there is a point may that something needs to be done to force Facebook to be held accountable because they cannot look whenever this when we have in Sri Lanka. Censorship, no good, but Facebook should not be allowed to Caen, and you on account of you, know it without account. There are massive multi billion dollar corporation with with international interests flaunting the live long, whatever country they operate and they should be allowed to do it. Something needs to happen. So I think

Roger Mcnally as an interesting point, be bold, shut him down temporarily and then a wake him up, That's going to slice their revenue right down the middle, and maybe something like that needs to happen, Otherwise, and this is actually kind of hilarious, they could face jail. Time over refusing. So what are we really interesting because thing about this right now I'd be willing to bet. Zuckerberg Sandberg will not be going to Canada anytime soon think about that they have interest in Canada. They ve got offices, they ve got employees. There is real. They need to go there well now, if they do they're gonna have to go in front of parliament and testify and if they don't, they could face jail time, probably will not happen that way, but seriously the fact that listen, let us it. Let me say like this: do I really think so barks can't get arrested? No, I absolutely don't, but can you in parliament is putting that on the table to hold them.

Contempt and if the faces jail time for this, they are saying it straight up think it's a lottery, it's it's a lottery winnings chance at anything can happen. What about Kosovo? million or something but damn this shows their serious, unfortunately, most of no it'll, never happened, soccer bergs way too powerful way to money. Canada is a kind we have thirty six million people should he be held accountable should face will be accountable. One hundred percent is up. Burg, worried now, I'm pretty sure Zuckerberg JD facebooks GDP rivals that of Canada, maybe not anime, that's a bit. You know facetious lots of less. Let's reading often they'll. It's only fitting, but there's an ongoing summons. So as soon as they step foot in our country, they will be served An expected to sit in front of our committee said: Zimmer was the chair of the the House of Commons Committee on access to information, privacy and ethics, in our joint efforts. Zuckerberg Sandberg flouted a subpoena a subpoena to appear before the committee, during a hearing attended by international law makers, about privacy, misinformation and hate speech

That's why I'm kind of like you know you can't really control these things, but you know what that's Canada. Ok, I think what if you agree, I can't gonna. Do it? Ok and the? U S, we operate under deaf different rules on, fortunately, He spoke doesn't operate under our social norms in America either. So it's for the reasons I think Facebook is just awful just completely awful, so there's lots of happening right. You can get the just that, I think is really fascinating. Overall on our side, virtue to general Wee Wee, wee, wee, publishes, video and Zuckerberg, ignore subpoena politicians are outraged. We arena, we didn't to make any thing. Those over sensational, like Zuckerberg, faces jail time, which is what I'm doing on this video and that because I want to make sure that the distinction between my personal canyon and my outrage versus what the story Actually is so the way It really really well, but I tell you, I could you not when I reading. So the way we do this is it's a is a script is produced, whereas with these videos I just dont be described,

So, as I am reading this, I'm just get angrier and angrier seriously check out the video on suffers and, like I don't know, if you can tell really angry on trying not to be so. I want to make sure that when you watch these videos, when you get our news of rats averse, it's not going to be. You know, I don't know pushing my bit my you're. My pending you come here I'll give you my opinion, and I asked in Dublin but our stories we ve already done on servers brought, but I gotta tell you men Ray. this story. Cyber style put the Lincoln the description. It's it's really endeth cover. A wide range of the issues surrounding what happened with the regulation Facebook is facing, but me and is it infuriating to hear about how like Zuckerberg is justice, conceded narcissistic, awful person who is unaccountable? Who gets away with these things? Ok, he should not be above the law he shouldn't. You know we are world of various countries of different cultures and different rules.

He wants to make money off the backs of the canadian citizens than he's gonna be held accountable to their government, but no bird, runs his business and then doesn't show up when he's asked and what's in which new, it's really. What what really really frustrated me. Really really made me angry So I'm reading the scripts right and we get to a point. Are we read one of the quotes from Facebook, spokespeople spokesperson whenever and then later on Following more commentary, they give basically the exact same statement, so they say We are absolutely you know going to work with the commission, whatever they need and then don't show up. There asked again the go. Yes we're! Absolutely it's like identical soap, to check it out the quota like identical, and it was that statement that Facebook, though it the way, I see it Canada's like hey got problems. We need you to come here and talk to us. Zuckerberg says no and then facial issues

So now there saying we're gonna issue a summons. You could face petticoat contempt in jail time and they issue The exact same stating that says to me: that's like that's ethical low, tier smack in the face, giving them the same statement. really saying we dont care about you. We won't show up and here is the same piece of paper. We handed you last time because we can't even be bothered to write a new paragraph, I really you know, a leaders is one of the things that bothers me more than anything else in the world and its. Why, such disdain for many of these democrats. These people, who are so we're wealthy, somehow there in Congress and there salaries. A hundred thousand Algeria, but they're worth two hundred million dollars out is that up- and I have no idea- not all out of them are broke there is just some lifelong positive that somehow managed be worth hundreds of millions of dollars

gotta wonder: how that happens. The elite, ism, the double standard and mark Zuckerberg is a perfect example of that he has. He refuses to acknowledge the problems they they flaunt their power They ignore that the rule of law. They ignore the people demanding that they follow the rules they ignore. It is flaunting his wealth and you know what Zuckerberg, if it if it takes the form of of we're Emily shutting down Facebook. Maybe that's what needs to happen now. Facebook, I think, is awful, but at the same time as much it's fun to talk about shutting down Facebook that that the more something is private business rise like a mentioned, but also individual rights. This is a tool used by me imagine if the government shut down eighty in t, because eighty anti wouldn't show up your phone stopped working yeah, that's not okay and I understand is different in that you pay, a bunch of different facebook is free for all. user and they sell adds shutting down. Facial could disrupt there, very, very seriously, hurt them shutting off the phone company. Wouldn't because already got your money, they have a priority for the Miss Davies

like that, but there's gotta be a solution, and I think that one of the biggest challenges- how do you make Facebook play ball? How do you make facial play by because you can threatened with jail time. I really don't think Zuckerberg cares. Dudes billionaire, you think, he'd give the crap about drawing up and categories is ever gonna happen, so you can you can waving his face but think about these politicians. Yes, they have power as politicians to an extent, but they have nowhere near. power that sucker but has yet to understand how dangerous facebook is moving forward and why this is so serious. Ok, Facebook can chew. Not to allow a political message to appear in their platform. The only thing holding them from world domination. Is Google and that's not a good thing, because Google does the same thing and their income? are aligned and a lot of ways. Let's say wanted politicians what he thinks I want to go for reelection, facebooks gonna be like hate speech like they ve done to other people and now you get up. You gotta positive steps up and says I want to run for all

You know, I don't know. I don't even play round because like that, but someone so that they want to run for office to stop Facebook manipulating alike. hence spreading misinformation, and whatever else reckoned so Mark Zuckerberg back with his feet up, says, that same pair referendum last time and that the latest profile it's a private platform. We can do it. We want regulation needs to happen. Ok, it needs to happen well. Chamberlain of human events wrote a really great article explaining that in the? U s regulation, We can only ratchet in one direction- says a lot of conservatives who don't seem to understand. If regulation hits these platforms, it can only serve to protect speech only the first amendment: it has already been ruled by the Supreme Court that these are. These platforms are important for public discourse. about time. Something happened to stop them from flaunting the law, breaking the rules and look if they have melody to suspend any one they want for any reason you will not. Then then no one,

could ever challenge them. It's it's authoritarian insanity, its techno, fascism, listen, you know it's ugly Maybe fascism is a better to explain it, but I think about what we see in world war to this idea of ever expansive power, manipulating people controlling people, Facebook, their international. They can restrict reach on whatever level they want their private Thus they say well guess what there will come a time when these. You know. Leftwing individuals wants to challenge the system, the surveillance and Facebook or go extremist. Think about it. I believe it was FBI documents and our homeland security. This was published by the end of and then we also know that all my security New Jersey, they listened anti far as political. You know, extremists that their listed under terror,

Facebook really wants to. They can easily associate anyone who aligns at the far left and say out, but they were engaged in these activities. And what do you say? How do you putty prove them wrong? Think about the you know: I'm refer this to the crass instance right. If enough removed They are the presence. Danes are the anti brothers recently suspended from twitter. What a twitter say they were, they were buying fake engagements operating multiple accounts or something like that and in fact, put it in actual they did. Someone said why would they funded, and they said the rules apply to everybody operating fact counts, never directly, accusing them and that's how they do it. You have no proof people than anything wrong. You're like the crass instance, but though the perfect example of twitter doesn't proof why they were banned. Facebook doesnt prove why they are. and so what do you think is going to happen? You have politician, Yeoman activist you have some rising up in saying enough. These people are insane and need to be stopped and they'll say. Oh,

or secretly sending violent messages? We have to delete em out unpeopled scope, oh wow, this is a nice is facing is seriously then I make you understand that phase. We can do control, most of search most the content. You see comes through these platforms, and they can choose to remove a news website that challenges that we are facing. An we we are in the nightmare to Sylvia. So you know what maybe Zuckerberg does need some jail time. We'll never happen, though, because Well, what was the last time you saw someone of power held to account? It never happens it doesnt, you can name you. Can you can pie count you? You probably can't count on your fingers and toes you menopause. patients who probably should have been locked up and weren't I'm with someone like this, who flaunts the rule of law, able to control speech on a grand scale. Men work under the nightmare and it's a joke

whilst because people say oh temples, next impulse channels are going to deliver on its utopia. Yup bringing on men bring it on, and I'm gonna keep talking about this. I don't. I don't care. If Google have Google Google wants shut me down because I'm calling them. The massive power and demanding some kind of regulation and control these companies that are out of control, so be it so be it. I will stand in front of the firing line and say these big tech companies are out of troll, and this is another example now I do believe Google is nowhere near as bad as Facebook, but certainly Google has its problems, cultural problem in the company and they and their just to massive enough too much power. You can you know Admittedly, Youtube has done more to protect speech than Facebook. Certainly has think about. The people been banned recently in Google's refuse to ban them. Think about saw

I'm getting bankrolls platforms, Youtube's refuse to ban bantam. So I can respect that. It doesn't change the fact that too much power and there needs to be some kind of restriction in control and these people under the first amendment, which means they cannot restrict speech. Gotta figure it out. We do, but you know what I ll leave it. There are stick around more seconds to come. Next will be starting shortly for those in the podcast. If you want to support my work on the Pike S, ITALY, the Good review, depreciated everyone else. I will see you at one p m on this channel. I will AL season. I haven't seen the movie book smart, but I hear it's really good Iran, tomatoes, it's gotta. Ninety seven percent, however, for some strange reason I don't know what the audience score is, and there is a good reason for that RON, tomatoes is trying to protect movies from angry fans or from politics from the culture war. And the truth is you know you can pay what any movie like Aladdin or John Work or bright Berne and see that

Well, then really like it, and you can see the odd scores almost immediately. So why is it that book smart doesn't have an audience score while the reality as books mark is a woke movie woke I've heard good things from people, so I dont want to act like it's a bad move. You should go see it, however, the movie is doing really really really bad at underwear It's like fifty per it missed its projections, while at fifty percent is a lot of reasons for it. But there's one. You will get a lot of our being highlighted a lot see The movie was directed by Olivia Wild and two years ago we saw story from a J R celebrities, ask trumps supporters to boycott their movies, but are in for a rude awakening. I say with the controversial election of Donald Trump, many celebrities she's may have come out publicly to bashing and claim he's a racist ceiling. but now they seem to have completely lost their minds and are now requesting that the people who are ultimately partly responsible for their paychecks boycott their movies

Monday, great anatomy, actress Ellen Pontio started a twitter storm aimed directly at the president. It started when Bumpo notice the sweet. She then publicly replied tweeting two or one point: three million followers news flash. I dont want trump supporters for fans, Einstein wow so hesitant about we do have a tweet from Olivia while they say pompiers in the only celebrity who has treated about her trumped supporting fans, Olivia Wild restoring and nineteen. Eighty four on Broadway couldn't care less effort from supporting fans boycott her movies, even inviting them to setting trompe trolls defined racism as free speech and threatening to boycott my movies. Please I thing: do you got awkward as one of our trump supporting fans didn't hesitate to abandon ship saying not defining racism, but your challenge has been accepted. You are not as important as you think you are, nor are your tweets. So here's the thing book Smart came out its being praised by critics. We don't

What the audience thanks I've seen. Some are some more people, I trust say it and it's actually pretty funny. However, at the box office. And United States and Canada Books Mart was released alongside Aladdin and Bright Berne and was projected to gross around twelve million from two thousand five hundred five theatres. In its four day, opening weakened the film made two point: five Its first day, including eight hundred and eighty five thousand dollars from thirst at previous, it ended up underperforming debuting to just six point. Five million dollars afford a total of seven point, eight finishing six: that's what like down forty or so percent it was. It was projecting for twelve million jobs. Work over performed this movie underperformed Olivia Wild tweeted about it saying anyone out there saving books mark for another day consider making that date. Today we are getting creamed by the big dogs out there and need your support. Dont

studios an excuse not to green light movies made by and about women. One of the big challenges in making movies is that we often hear produce. Indirect or say nobody wants to see a female, even things like that. It's mostly not true. I dont know if that rhetoric is absolutely true, but we hear that allow We can hear Olivia Wild saying, don't give him an excuse not to green light who is made by and about women. Wonder woman, petty, chickens. I believe was the director and it was led by a woman. So it's really. thing at the movies flopping and I'm I don't want to act like this. Has anything to do with her calling for Trump supporters to boycott it. People are drawing those conclusions that was two years ago. What you gotta understand, It's not so much about whether or not Olivia wild sides transporters. Don't don't watch. My movie because maybe she doesn't have it many trump bands anyway, I don't know it's an issue of the arrogance and its

summed up in this response. You are not as important as you think, nor are your tweets. These celebrities are marketing tools, celebrity act. What what? What? What what good as a celebrity if they say I'm going to cut my market in half The only reason celebrities are verified. Personalities on tv is because they give brand recognition to a project if you're too movie was coming. and they had known him actor. You probably not gonna, think twice celeb. These are the marketing asset. Now, Dogan me wrong. A lot of actors and actresses are really really good at what they do. Comedians are really funny, but that's why they're called a celebrity and it's not about being an actor There are many people who are celebrities who do literally nothing it's because their brand assets their high profile people that people are interested in some reason, so you are a good director or actor or whatever fine. But when you act like you, this important, please effing do boycott my movies. I think it's fair to say it's possible.

Who played a role mostly because there is also this readier. They say there's, a review from vocs and make sure I a vulture said it manages to be inclusive and progressive without in precious about anything or sacrificing an ounce of humor Alyssa, Wilkinson, Vocs award the film four to five writing a book. Smart feels like an evolution of the team comedy genre, the movie, my understanding it is supposed to be like super about, I guess, and its somewhat woke. I dont like this, My opinion, that's actually what one of the critic said that it was like inconclusive, woke or whatever so fine, but I've. But I have to think about a few thanks. I dont want to see a movie. I barely one This he super about right. The reason I want you're going in seeing supervised. My friends told me to go, see it this movie, US was to be very similar. I read the plot and its basically like one of these will be is kind of like heralding Kumar its. I guess I would call it like low brow hang over time,

how many you know, nothing really happens. It's just like people do and weird things, and this don't make sense my understanding of it, but I guess we'll find it funny. But ultimately you can look at two things: super bad, None of the actors in super bad will particularly famous like near these two two young women who are in an article in Venice, but there is a difference. One is woke. One does not have to wonder if that plays a role rights of several factors that that really damage this movie I do believe that getting woke is damaging because regular people don't care for this. So when you market this, as woke I'll, tell you what man I have scorned and I have no interest in going to see a welcome move That's critics are saying about it. Count me out, because look it's not just about this one movie can I want to stress I've heard from people who try to actually pretty good. I'm still not gonna go see it star wars. The last July I dont consider to be a get, woke, go broke and all I don't actually care

Bout admiral hold out or or re, or whatever else, just really poorly written. A plot made no sense. It was a painful to sit through Ghostbusters Painful Captain Marvel P in full and what happens after. I see it and tell- and I tell people hey I didn't like it- I get accused of every name in the book you're not allowed to criticise certain movie southern screw it I'm not going to go anywhere near it. Olivia Wilder activists, movie, she's been very in the past about her activism. You know telling transports of worker movie Why would I want to go see your movie you're a mean person, you're weird? I don't care about that Robert Downy Junior. Has you got out of his I've done nothing like that and and captain more captain, America, Chris Evans, only Bear lease skip the criticisms. I have criticised some form of our partners and mark ruffle out. You know there are many people who have done big movies that are very critical of. However, the movies aren't build as welcome movies. I know their captain. America isn't going to be a welcome movie. They did black widow very, very well,

Captain Marvel was a welcome movie, I ultimately didn't want to see it, and then I did- and I just thought it was bad for a lot of reasons, but isn't it so weird that when bad movies get made, I'm sorry when woke movies, end being bad. All of a sudden, now you're not allowed to criticise it, all of a sudden. Now this is a movie made made by women have fallen, We have to make sure that that we dont give these citizens excuse that the green light it. What what we're talking about, there's a bunch of where we started by women and an but by women. Why is this always the narrative? So I'll tell you what books part may be a good movie. I do not want a trash movie. Is a good move. Have her I've heard it to good movie? it's funny, I don't wanna, go see it. I dont because what I've done and seen as moves are often described as woke. I've gone and safety movies that have been produced by feminists, who claim that very movie is a movie for women are something, and it's always ended up being bad wonder woman was just wonder woman, and that movie was good. The hunger

aims was just the hurricanes that was good? Ghostbusters was the was billed as the all female reboot and it was bad Then we had at the Marvel witches there talking like they seriously slam down this narrative about women being led as I do. We have this: it's not white. Whenever they try to use boldness to market a movie, it ends up being bad, it does black. Panther was partially marketed by some groups as being woke for sure, but the Please trailers didn't play that game. In fact, captain marvels did all these marvel movies with actors and actresses. There are overtly political, don't play the game by all means your private lifesaving. If you want, I left my respect for doing so saying if what you believe him, but let's go through it right now.

Your wilds has transporters, don't gotta. My movie will great think about this. Tromp supporters make up around is actually is to play a game. You that's interesting trumps approval around what forty five percent right you! So, if you are the arguments of hard numbers, forty five percent of people polled support. The president She told those forty five people to boycott her movies and then, strangely enough, her movies elections are down around that much isn't it so so again please don't make it seem, like I'm actually saying Trump supporters boycott of the movie. If I'm not, our trumps porkers. What about ASEAN will be, regardless of whether said anything or not, is also important to point out for some reason. They decided to launch their move at the same time as Aladdin come on man, everyone's gonna go CNN and bright burned, but rightward was kind of bad I also want- and you know so- I guess I ll leave it. There look! Listen! If you tell forty five out of the park, it's actually like fifty construct out well at an opera. This way Trump got worse,

sixty three million and Henriette sixty six, many of those votes trumped got, aren't Trop supporters, they're, just people saying I'd rather have a Republican somewhat that right. So when you look at trumps approval writings and then you tell that go with it don't come to my movie, don't be surprised when literally, what happens to your movie, so I do feel like this. Is they get woke? Go broke? I also feel it might come to be sad because the movie may be good, unfortunately, they have an activated the audio score yet so I can't even read what people are thinking, even if the movie got brigade nobody was forgetting book. Smart, there's, no power any worsening books Mark Hiram by Say, why won't run it show me what the audience thinks. I don't care of the credits. The critics are wrong. Ok, I mean the critics worked somewhat wrong on a lad and it was a little bit better than fifty seven percent, but they, like you, look at a movie like death wish and have you ever seen it before Bruce? Less is a dad getting vengeance or something, and he buys guns and all the critics.

that slammed it, but the audience loved it and, unlike gather movie, was very entertaining it was. It was fun widened the critics like it because the critics are politically motivated. Am I going to trust their views for books, one from critics? Hell no show me what the audience as unfortunately, its as coming soon and they haven't activate. Why they're scared of people coming near the says. It's has run tomatoes does view this, as a woke movie will tell you what not making what movies and I'll go watch him because I love going to. I do like every Can I look at the movies? I hope my friends and, unlike hey guys, you're the movies that are out and we went up right, but an eleven we did not go, see books mark. You know why it's awoke movie, that's look. It might not actually be what we want on. I'm not trying to say like that, but all indications show this is awoke movie run tomatoes.

the score Olivia while directing it saying no Trump supporters, reviewers sang it inclusive and progressive, and unlike bad, but that that up that, if your like that that the worrisome thing for me as if you're gonna make a movie and politics at the forefront of your identity and your marketing, then you're going to sacrifice could start on. As far as I'm concerned, Captain Marvel was was bad. Ok, it was not a good movie. At the very least you consider, Captain Marvel was welcoming, like I sat there like me, but they are generally some. Just just genuinely Quinci parts and then all I am saying this and am reiterating it, but look. no matter what you say about these movies, they're gonna come after you, they're gonna call you a man baby. I made a tweet about captain marble being a villain when she electrocuted his hand and all of a sudden, you know about other people highlighted this too, but all We can always articles like my man, babies are all heaven forbid. I criticise or a character in a movie. These people are out of their gourd. So you know what, if that's the result of this culture? Don't

we surprised when you're movie flops miserably, and then you have to beg people to show up. Ok, because you play that game No matter what really funny it's getting celebrities saying come on guys, go, see it and guess what nobody did. All these works but he's cheering on this movie and they flopped, and you don't look, there's some money. sure the want of money they made is still going to be. You know ok, but they underperformed, and that could be the result of bad analytics bad projections, but there you go if, if we combine not the money you projected along with the director saying: please, go and see it they're gonna! You know it's gonna, be an excuse to stop making moves about women like oh, please do not gonna stop wonderment. Smash hit, you think, they're gonna stop doing of yours, low, budget film, please the arrogance of these people, that's the big thing. Ok, that's the last thing I mention they think they're. So important. Do I dont think I'm then import and even though anybody follow me. I'm surprised you got any views on these videos seriously. I just relax I'm doing talking about stuff. Why? Why would they

you shouldn't be any more important than any one else: you're, not you're. Just the person who is on a screen that people watch things. You are just a person it in fact actors and actresses are, though, are the last people who should be celebrities. You literally per day to be somebody for a living sure I get it there's a lot of. Getting involved. Things me hard if there is a lot of work, but I there. I rather celebrate scientists, astronauts, firefighters, etc, as would many other people so stop acting like in the most important people on the planet and that you have. You could boycott people because surprise, surprise your marketing tool and we tell forty five percent of the people not to adopt your event or round Guess what you're projections are down by about that much money in that weird, maybe it really that transporters, I'm going to see your movie and historic aware: I'm done, I'm not one or any more nice ring announced the ground more submits to come later today, and I will see you then And why you journalism gets woke, goes broke controversy a little while ago and

are you, was going to house a disgraced former New Yorker fact checker, who is also a far left activist, who worked for media matters to teach a journalism class, the far right. It makes no sense if you want, I want to teach someone about reporting, regardless of their political affiliation. Why would you pick some who had lost their job essentially because they couldn't Why would you hire someone who worked for an overt activist organization? Well, unfortunately, it didn't work out. And while many people were saying you shouldn't do this there there was more than just the political reasons there was actual monetary reasons, and why you Council's former New Yorker fact: Checker Tal Eleven journalism class. Today our talk a bit about the faintness of woke journalism, the failures evoked journalism, journalism is getting woke and going broke as a whole. It bet it. I've got a bunch of stories. We can go through vocs. The Vocs Union Vocs members, its veto, acts state. walk out wanting more money when the companies are in dire straits. Rachel meadows me

I ratings are already down and the addiction to twitter. These journalists have its. actually making them stupider. I am not exaggerating, or joking study finds that so twitter specific. It makes people stupid are now before we get started going. It's him cast outcomes flashed on it. If you'd like to support work. There is a monthly donation option. Crypto currency addresses a physical address, but of course, the best thing you can do like the video comment on the video could engage a really helps share the link, if you like it that much or subscribe, if you haven't already so first Let's read the story from John Levine of the rap. They say no University has cancelled an undergraduate journalism class that former New Yorker fact our Tal Eleven was scheduled to teach this. This fall after only two students signed up, get well go wrong.

The decision to hire Levin to teach the elective reporting on the far right had drawn criticism, since she resigned her new Yorker position. Last June after falsely accusing an ice agent of having a and a z, I too Edinburgh, director of undergraduate studies it and while Use Arthur L Carter, journals. Immense do said, low in Rome and forced him to cancel the class cancelling the class had nothing to do with tallies, writings, tweets or anything else. We cancel it because too few students enrolled Hamburg added Levin did not immediately respond to requests for comment and why journalism electors are cabinet. Fifteen students with an apartment has run courses, courses with us was eight students under certain circumstances, also said it was unlikely. His department would invite Levin back. It would make no sense, try it again, given how few students expressed interest. He said we have no plans to offer Tal another course simply because her main focus and the focus of our upcoming book is the far right

official and why you faculty Bio, which lauded her as an expert in foreign extremism and social justice, was removed some time around April twentieth, one nineteen according to the internet archives Wayback machine in our original course Levin promised a fulsome exploration of the far right saying she show students how to track identify online extremism now want to stop your point. How absurd it is, and then this is addressing it controversy if you want someone to teach people how to identify the far right, why would you hire someone who falsely identified an ice agent and then was for to resign from their job and then went to work activists organization and then for reason. Didn't doesnt work there anymore, it seems like if you want something to teach people, they would be at least somewhat successful in their track. I'm not gonna hire a plumber to build a deck for me nor carpenter to fix. I toilet. Why would you hire someone who's failed at the job to do it? They say in an

when hate is on the rise. The course will provide student journalist with a thorough grounding in far right and white supremacist movements in the. U S briefly examining their history and delving into their sprawling present incarnations reads a now deleted course: description which also must a careful analysis of pieces that have fallen short of the mark Latvians, three year career. As a fact check out. The New York at the new Yorker was derailed. Last June, effigy tweeted an accusation that just a partner, wheelchair bound ice agent of sporting, an iron crossed her two overslept elbow she later deleted the tweet, an apology after learning, the tattoo represented a maltese cross, a symbol common? used by members of the: U S: veterans of foreign wars. They gone that she worked as it streamers unrestricted from EU matters and they say her paw? the time to get and why you soon came under fire from rightwing critics as well, but I mean the creditors. Mostly was started by trying to be disrespectful. John living reported on this, I believe he was alone

Covered the store that their hiring her and I think for good reason outside of any right wing criticism. He says in March Levin a daily basis. The attention from right wing media has resulted in death threats and harassment. Its view a disconcerting, when someone with three million viewers calls me a terrorist Levin wrote on website I've gotten some death threats. I've got a lotta slurs. I've been called a sea at ten thousand Times I will point out. No one deserves that kind of abuse or behaviour. I would also point out that I regularly see if similar behaviour and it is unjustifiable- and it is wrong- you could disagree with with tall. You can not like her. That's fine but You know, there's something that we do have a serious problem: the internet, where people all just pylon and target people- and I find it personally disgusting- I do. As I mentioned time and time again, my twitter feed is locked at ninety nine notifications and it's mostly people just saying awful nasty things not always has a lot of good. People, though, can be wrong, but twitter is a terrifying planning. and it's really interesting than that. We we

about. That's not gonna, read too much into the story, but I want to highlight this as a pertains to journalism twit. Where is eroding your intelligence, now, there's data to prove it. They found that in their study twitter use was associated with a twenty five to forty percent standard deviation from the average results were in reduced performance, they essentially set up. I don't wanna wanted about too much, but they set up a study where they had people do a traditional course forces. Reviewing things on twitter and found the people who are on Twitter had a massive deviation in the negative, so here's what happens? Journalists live on twitter. Look at the coming ten controversy. Look at all of these big stories where journalists just get tweets and then right stories about them. Think about how many stories were based on one random, twitter user. some random known. Importers are made an opinion and then a news outlets at hey. Here's historians at some people say it's not news, but has try and stop of sea, and on this point it out whether you like the guy or not use right. Journalists have an unhealthy relationship

twitter and the data shows us it's making them stupid. Is it at all surprising then, when we stories like Rachel Madhouse ratings continue to plummet. This is just from the other day ratings are still going down now, Rachel Metals power. And was Russia Gate for sure she built up an audience or on a conspiracy there that made no sense and is honesty. the same thing to do a twitter, but I highlight this because you can see Certain people becoming more successful, getting woke going broke is not success and we have an additional story: vocs media, shifting its hiring towards part timers and contract workers since its staffing unites us, from even louder talks about how just the other day vocs Union employees staged a walk out for about an hour because they want better benefits, better pay, etc and by all means they should be allowed to export. However, VOX, is it doing too well in a story published by

box. They recognise that media is media, investments are becoming worthless and they even recognize that investments in VOX itself are per hour likely worth less than they ve been than they are perceived to be an twenty fifteen. How do you end up with these two? demanding more from a company that is failing. It is entirely- or I should say it is. is partly the woken up. That is driving these companies into extinction. In the past couple of years, I've pointed out as they become more and more desperate. They start thrashing about I'm going for wherever they can, they activists the activists are woke and then they go broke and why you should really great example: listen to people to we're going to apply for this class. It is not a market opportunity; it is not what regular people want it is about. Idea, you can look at all the stats about the Democrats mature. you have the Democrats according to Pew and gallop, as well as other surveys.

Want more moderate policy. They don't want woke policy, it doesn't work now. Some people might argue these are outliers. These are. These are special cases, but now we ve seen it will let publish this story. Research by a man named even Lenihan, where they found there absolutely. is an overlap between the far left and journalists journey. absolutely are acting as activists. I actually have all personal experience working with these companies and seeing that they legitimately are activists on other, really good ample would be Buzzfeed, seasoning, Buzzfeed, collecting thirty bright programmes, a twitter account and ended and asking twitter why they won't ban them. This is that this is a routine. That activists do. Is this what they do to try and get people banned, but most people don't want this Here's what will do? Let's read a little bit into what's going on with Rachel Matter, and I know it's not necessarily the same thing but we are seeing that many outlets associated with the left are hurting again. The four

Tori being that nobody wants to go, see, learn from a course from someone who felt their job, but getting worse. in journalism is ultimately a bad thing and I feel like I'm kind of all over the place on this one, but I will but before we Rachel metals ratings. It's very simple story, our Are you guys a kind of personal anecdote? I worked for fusion for those in our familiar haven't heard this story before fusion, wasn't abc innovation, joint venture and, I first started. They said they were going to be non partisan, bachelor post on the wall, about. Seven or eight months and they decided to change the editor in chief and go woke and sure enough. The company went broke and those operating under a skeleton I have seen this happen time and time again. There is a correlation. Perhaps causation. Excuse me, between companies embracing woke, writing and walk politics and doing increasingly worse, no surprise to me that we can see that Rachel Matthau, though again she's more Russia Gate is ratings drop. They say

let us show which has dedicated years to intensive covered surrounding the Mahler investigation. Average. Two point: six million viewers per night with foreign turn, ten thousand in the key demo. They say her show came a third for Cape for cable news behind thoughts. Prime time show how sanity across an etc meadow peaked. In January this year, where she average three point: three million viewers that number dipped to three point: one million in February and again to two point: nine million in March, her march coverage included the beginning of the end of the Mahler problem, Rachel Meadow chased after another kind of far left narrative about Russia. Gazed are the same as going woke, but this would have. When the narrative dries up, and this is why I want to highlight Rachel matters specifically. This was thing that was particular to a specific political faction was not news, was kind of off like completely insane and ultimately ended with her ratings collapsing, because a story is over now

ok. Ideology doesn't necessarily have that same conclusion, where we can definitely say doesn't work, but we, of seeing that in many instances this far left activism does not work. It absolutely doesn't I think what we're seeing here with vocs particularly, is that the company is hurting. They can't afford to hire full time staffers anymore, They are now shifting to hiring part time and contract workers and in response two vocs failing getting well being broke, I mean they, and work for a while. The vocs Union demands more money, it doesn't work, but it brings up another important point about getting woke and going broke. Vocs claims to be this. You know left wing Ankara this this media outlets and they have opinions on the left as recline, for instance, but when it comes time to pay them what do they? Do they push back and don't give the employees the security they're? Looking for it seems that weakness only exists as he's

of surface level, shallow endeavour, and when it comes down to it, the company's hurt the staff loses money and then eventually they lay people off vocs thinks their own evaluation is dropping. Multiple companies are Lang, people off no one's showing up to these classes, but we see it over and over and over again, these media companies are becoming increasingly welcome fact, the Columbia Journalism Review. Actually endorsed ones journalism Colombia, journalism, reviews, what's not just and why you were sing. Another college related outlet saying straight up that people who are critical of Trans activism should be allowed to run on the on on the subject. At least that's the story was even a daily collar in reference to a CD article in the story. They say see J R published a p by media matters for America and other large Parker Malloy in which explicitly pushes for future perspectives and fewer voices in reporting on whether its fair for

biological men fortify s, women to compete and women sports mean As for America, is a self described liberal activists nonprofit how much more do we need. These news outlets of new airports are just hiring activists, push activist We can then see the correlation unnecessarily causation of these companies. Dwindling and burning out. I've mentioned it before, but I think happen they made money off of algorithms that changed and people don't want this stuff anymore. It's just not going to work and I think it spells disaster, but Let me just wrap up by saying you know what kind of wonder bring to get bring other with the segment We have numerous instances non. Stop instances of the failings of these digital outlets. Vocs isn't at the point where their Lang, people off they have, I believe they have laid lang- people off before their been last before

but we're seeing CNN repeatedly do laughs. We ve seen Buzzfeed we ve seen vice, but now we're seeing. One of the things at VOX is doing is looking for contract workers and part time workers and the union. His anger about it. How much more evidence do you need to say this is a bad idea in media and you need. To be more rational and less activists, but time and time again, its active, now don't get me wrong. Conservatives deserve a ton of criticism here because I believe it, Mike's renovate you pointed out conservatives. you journalism, they tend to do commentary, and the question is why why that liberals are the ones doing the journalism and then conservatives comment on it. There's gotta be some. I was there and if conservatives want to see more fairness and media, then perhaps we need to do some straight journalism. Now I I'll say this. I am not a journalist I answered. I am Well, I guess What I mean to say is I never considered my journals. It was. It was thrust upon me.

So I certainly am a unique individual. Whatever the space is vital, bombings click, the powers that I'm not because I said a multiple times. I do commentary Instead. Are these not this channel, unless I can show very largely political commentary, but when it comes to what we're doing this adverse is one hundred percent journalism? So call me whatever you aunt, but there needs to be more balanced in journalism. There actually needs to needs to be. We need it. We can't just have people on twitter slowly getting stupider. We can't just have universities, publishing far left activists and hiring far left activists each courses- we add something else, so I guess I'll just wrap this up. I thought this is one of the more our no kind of I feel like I'm all over the place on this one, but I hope you get the idea. I'm trying to say is that journalism has gotten woke and and it's going broke, and maybe, if they stop and figure out, why it's a bad idea. These companies could actually come back from the brink. Maybe not. I think they won't do it, because there are dick.

To it. They don't want to give up what little they have so they're gonna keep squeezing that spongy the last drop out. In the meantime, there is a new open for digital outlets that aren't going to play politics to arise, and maybe that's a good opportunity for sufferers and my at that for those are for me, that's my point. x or I'll leave it there. I suppose thanks for hang out some gas conflict stunted transport. My work again subscribe. You haven't already common below. Let me note thank and seriously comical new to think and am I will see you on the excitement. I saw a pool not that long ago that sad most people view liberal policies as mainstream and there was another graph. Airport and on several times over the past year. That shows that brand more, It exists in the left wing spectrum on social media, meaning that when it comes to big brand they also would rather advertise in left wing spaces and that's why, You'll, see things like you know: Org making a rainbow flag package. Things like that. Now that we're become scary

I am. I am not a. I believe climate change is an issue that needs to be dealt with. I think we have to be rational and reasonable and If someone disagrees and there's a disagreement based on science and paperwork, fine, we can still come to a rational discussion that will solve these problems. not one, you have you been waiting their arms, they are screaming the end. As nine we have twelve years. I've talked repeatedly about the solutions that conservatives and liberals can come together to at least mitigate some of the climate change damage. So the issue, as the left, is in mainstream media right. You know anti tromp. All this stuff is late night talk shows they control these cultural industries. What scary is not to me? The climate change is issue which is hard to quantify. It's hard, really grasp and understand. What scared me is that, when the left jumps in do these signs denial train this story from the daily wire professor since Trump my students have become bio.

Gee deniers for social justice and, and of course, we all get it we'll get. Science to me is the one among its it's the most important thing. It's I mean look, obviously happiness and life which take care of each other, but science makes life better figure out. The world wars were developing technologies. So when I see the mainstream universities, TB denying science, what I'm getting worried, I'm gone seriously word now before we get into all this grotesque cast accomplished on it. If you'd like to support my work, there's numerous ways you can donate importantly like an comment, because the engagement seriously does help and just share the videos that really does up subscribe. If you haven't already, it's always greatly appreciated, but let's get back to the store Athens. Quote their resort to denial ism to protect themselves from having to confront a worldview. They reject James, barbaric rights, while leftwing activists often accused conservatives have being science in Irish when it comes to global warming. One biology, professor at Williams, college, has noticed a troubling trend since the election of Trump,

students, zealous embrace of social does this ideology is increasingly resulting in denial ism when it comes two well established biological ideas, for instance, men are women. Men and women are different. Is that controversial seriously? It is in a for the Atlantic. Titled self censorship on campus is bad for science biology, Professor Lorna, moreover, who has found herself in the middle of a social justice outrage and who has found itself in the middle of social justice. Outrage in the past has pushed back, describes and pushed back, describes a ship she witnessed among a growing number of students since Trump when the presidency, at that moment, political tensions, we're running high on our campus and well stay most scientific ideas that had been teaching for years suddenly met with stiff ideological resistance. She writes, among those ideas is the concept of hair inability, the degree to which all bring genetically resemble their parents, both physically and and behaviour in class.

room discussion. I noted that that researchers have measured a large average difference and iq between the inhabitants of United States and those of my home country, Brazil, majority morose our rights I challenge the supposed intelligence differential between Americans and Brazilians. I asked students to think about the limit, nations of the data which do not control for I environmental differences and x find the wrong number saying nothing about whether observe differences are indeed inborn, that is genetic agreed even though she specifically challenges the reductive and potentially racist conclusions that some might reach many more students without any I reject the very notion of scientifically conducted IQ test, declaring them to be bogus science invented to ostracised minority groups and refuse to accept the way established idea that I q is partly influenced by genetics. She found similar push from students about any scientific studies about inherent differences between men and women and different races? It's crazy, isn't

that we live in this world. I went to Thailand and you don't really blew my mind, guess what people in Thailand are shorter on average than Americans, and so in Thailand. I'm looking at the Chinese New year, it was really awesome by the way seriously recommended Bangkok, as is beautiful. The food is great. The models are huge, but on this big street I could the over everyone's had and has a really strange feeling guess what I've all a ban to Norway and Scandinavia and their taller than me so I realise that there are genetic differences between people. An outlook, you guys know I'm rather centrist. I think that genetics and hair inherit ability do play a role in everything. From our behaviour to intelligence, but is my personal opinion based on my interpretation of what I've read and I could be wrong. I'm not a scientist is that I, but

if that nature plays a substantial role, a larger role to a certain degree of now, I'm not a scientist right. So I defer to the actual Neuro neuroscientist and things like that and act professors, but I do know there's a lot of debate on the issue. There are certainly some People who believe that you know nature is a bigger, bigger factor the nurture, but I think when you consider that somebody who said having an dehydrated is not going to function. Well, we can see that environment plays a huge role, and that includes not just where you live the temperature. We know that women perform better and in warmer temperatures than men, Israel, big factors that need to be taken to consideration. If we really want to understand the science behind all this again, I defer to the actual size It's not take my word for it just an opinion based on the limit things. I've read, but what we're seeing in social justice is not right, Nile of science, which is the craziest damn thing I've I've experienced my life. How is it but you know more said it

on scientific and a myth. She did check your fact that Org says her statement is false. They fact an opponent Patrick on purpose there has been a lot of. That is that there has not been a lot of scientific research on Trans athletes and sports, but the view trans am and have a competitive advantage in politics is not a myth or unscientific trans woman who undergrown you're, go hormone therapy lower their testosterone levels, which studies suggest decreases athletic,

women's rights. Random may still have more strength than biological and pound four pounds. I was reading about as recently as United Allergies, and I was reading how pre natal testosterone plays a huge role in development and that one of the biggest differences between men and women, biological, males and females is the ability to convert energy quickly into an in output. So men can jump higher because their body converts energy fat, it's fast which for the slow, twitch muscles my minor standing, but let us go back to the story. She says similar biological denial ism exist about near about nearly any observe difference between human groups, including those between male and female. She writes, unfortunately, students push back against these phenomenon, not by using scientific arguments, but by employing and and priority moral commitment to equality, anti racism and Anti Semitism, that's religion that is allegest behaviour to deny reality

for your moral ideology is religion. I am not a religious person, I'm out of a spiritual. I recognise the importance of the lessons learned and main and maintained to a certain extent within ancient text, and that goes for all religions. I think there's wonderful things within the Bible, the old testament and the new testament which we have used in our society to lay the foundations of things like the presumption of innocence, and I recognize a lot of bad things it and that of overt zealotry and dogma dangerous, and that we need to make sure we we treat people as individuals. We respect liberty and freedom, and that includes the right to believe what you want, but where such infringing on science and becoming law, that's when things get in Damn worrisome she says, they resorted to nihilism to protect themselves from having to confront a worldview. They reject that certain differences between groups may be based partly on by

Reggie. This denial is a manifest itself at times in classroom discussions and an emails in which students explain at length. Why should not be teaching that topic but- and I wasn't at times goes as far as even rejecting the notion that people have a biological instinct to protect their kin. because some students thought it was a mirage. It was merger actually endorsing trumps hiring of his family. These people are losing their minds. It's no religion. I thought about this. Well, actually I'll say this point again. She goes on to address the concept that interest infamously got James to more fired, that some genetic differences might lead to disproportionate representation of male or female in some fields, particularly stem fields for social justice, divests, since all people are supposedly blank slates. The only explanation for more men being Stanfield than than when is that they are cesspools of discrimination is happens when ideology or places biology. It's become taboo to

even mention the possibility that many men and women might have different preferences. Well, they do it's a fact. It is. But I want to. I want to say one thing you know about the ages. We Levin right there is the age of areas, age of Pisces, another age of acquire school, the procession of Equinox I could be. wrong. I am not an expert on snuff. Am I understand is that it is believed by some people. Religions are based on the new areas. They change so there was. This could just be apocryphal conspiracy, internet nonsense. But it's interesting thought because was the age of areas which was before the age of Pisces, which were in now and were entering the age of Aquarius. The age of areas that presumably has correlates with the rise of Judaism, they have the rams

things like that again, just something I read on some. You know like hokey astrology website, where I was interesting so fast tracked down this. It's just an idea of the point front bring up as a lot of people highlight this stuff, which I think is highly dubious. Astrology is now that's what they point out: the rise of new religions for different ages, and I wonder What the new religion for the age of Aquarius would be Assuming all that's true, because I am not an expert on this. Nor do I ever really talk about the stuff. I was thinking about what not any of that is is this and we can talk about it just ignore at all, because it could just be nonsense. Will there be a new When will there be something to replace Christianity or Islam or Judaism or wherever religion, because humans have like this whole in them for some kind of faith, Her sexuality seems to be that that religion, that the mood Rural ideology is more important that objective reality. In fact, I believe that objective reality exists. I cage whom not. It was one of the opening statesman.

made by other hieing intellectual dark. What professor who sat before we get started? If you don't agree with me that there is an objective reality, then you know we're at an impasse. Absolutely you know, I tell people simply because we perceive the world differently doesn't mean objective, relic doesn't exist, that's why we use tools and we share insight and that's it. That's me. humans are successful. That I can tell you something and you can replicate the behaviour because surprise, surprise. Reality is a thing, but only with their sides. Nihilism is dangerous I always make sure to start these things talking about climate change on purpose, whether you know you like it or not, because the point needs to be made that I dont care try by care about science, data, facts and science is repeatedly corrupted by politics, and that goes for climate science as well. I would raise the court why you know Al Gore's buying ocean front, bore beach property or whatever, or why, more importantly,

we are still allowing development in areas that are supposed to be flooded right. We're building! That is an area where the climate we once I think scrutiny and all these things very important. But at the end of the day I defer to the experts. The exports include the scientists If the scientists are saying these, these people on the left are denying science I take their word for it. Ok, plain and simple, as should most people, but I ll leave it there. I got a couple more segments coming up in a few minutes and I will see you in the story from sports illustrated former Ohio State athletes file, title nine lawsuit, overweight, Stresses alleged abuse college football thirty, so in former male athletes folly title mine, lawsuit against Ohio State on Wednesday, but alleges universe. so the officials did not intervene enough or stop doctor, but Doktor Richard straws from abusing when its during precision, physicals, seasoning or medical treatments, the loss it was filed in the? U S entered court include a named. Only one plaintiff. Former wrestler might d so bottle Wallis's me.

Other thirty, six as John those I have to say it's really impressive for anybody. Who's gonna put their name on paper. Everyone now that ve gone through these things, male or female, now listen, there's a reason why I want to highlight the story. It is not because As much as you know, you might hear some feminists, you know decry. I am trying to downplay the abuse women face. Certainly, I believe women are prime, are the primary victims of such assault and abuse. Absolutely I also feel like, worries about this. Well, this has been reported by sports, illustrated often go overlooked because our culture views men as disposable in some respects and abuse women as victims, and I think that's unfair, because up

Lately, men are victims, as we are seeing at least from his elevation. Thirty seven men filing a suit, claiming that the university didn't do anything to help them. More importantly, this is a title. Nine lawsuit and there's another want to bring this up. Miss the story is very, very fascinating. Important is that title. Nine is often expressed to be a tool for women to see equality, but in reality the law does not work that way. Civil rights go both ways, and that includes, if your man or woman, this story, it's a few points that title nine can be a force for good. I think it's used incorrectly by many institutions, but it can be a force for each for true equality and help people more victims, regardless of their gender. Often we see tunnel nine used against men who falsely accused and that's a serious issue, but here we can see at least a use of it that benefit summons and before we get started, checkout TIM cast icons flashed on it. If you like to support my work, there's multiple ways: you can donate Crypto, address office, glad dress or Paypal, but of course just

liking and commenting does wonders to help the video in terms of engagement. So, if you're, so, if you'd be willing and share the video and subscribe, because that obviously does way more bullets, redone o s, you had actual notice of, and was deliberately indifferent to, the fact that Richard Straws empty and unless you employ tenured faculty member and the US director of Alice You, sports, medicine programme, assaulted and abused. Hundreds of male owe us. You, student athletes and other male Lois, you undergraduates for over nineteen years. Moreover, unless you officials aided and abetted and actively concealed straw, since predation on unless you students, the lawsuit, said straws allegedly abused over a hundred and seventy seven male students between can seventy nine and ninety ninety seven and Ohio state the alleged,

use, spanned his time, working with athletes from sixteen sports, as well as working at the student house under and is off campus clinic strong, committed suicide into his five and was never prosecuted for his alleged crimes. I wanna make another point too. We often we hear a lot of rhetoric about how men are bad and I think it's unfair. I think it's fair to point out that men tend to be the perpetrators of violent crime, but also the victims of violent crime, so, at the end of the day, I think what I'm trying to say is this that this story, at least before I move on while men tend to be the perpetrators, we should focus on the victims and technical, seriously and not smear ninety nine point. Nine percent of men simply because point one tend to be overly. You know our predatory species, it is I'm trying to say

We see so much. You know redirect that. I think this is totally anti man and it's an lesson. I am all for. Gender equality equity allow terrorism all that stuff so long as you're, not being a dick about it right, I should say the stuff for then we should read the story, The lawsuit said: stress was assigned a locker in every room used by teams and Larkin tall and took showers of teams. Athletes were subject to long hernia checks by the doctor and were asked to drop their past or medical inspections with him, regardless of their injuries or needs the lawsuit stated that some Athens refer to stress. As MR a long fingers and MR touchy freely. John DOE number, six legend, the losses that he was abused by strong more than twenty times and was once required to drop his pants. When you visited Strasser Forefinger and I injuries occur, the lawsuit John DOE number, twenty three was assaulted. Forty to fifty times by straws who started,

medical visit with a hernia check, John DOE number, twenty three, also alleging that strong watched wrestling practices and would be the first one in the showers and the last one to leave talk about ribby behavior. But again I stress I mean it will let me don't you think I guess comment. Do thing title nine is working in this regard. John DOE number, nineteen o wrestler alleged expert- allow experiencing constant harassment and markets all feeling August during showers and finding notes in his locker proposition in him to meet up for colonel relations when he complained to an assistant, coach about being harassed and loans, John DOE number nineteen was told you grow up. The lawsuit said former rustling coach, Russ Howison complain to Ohio state officials about the environment, more control, because the conditions seriously impacted the psyche and morale of wrestlers how accent requested,

team shower in a separate area or be moved to a different building at a mystery and administrators denied has requests according to the lawsuit. Multiple football players complain about stresses behaviour to former team trainer Bill Hill, who did not tell athletes, actors behaviour was improper. Other personnel also brushed off complaints about stress, while precise sponsors differed. The just was almost always the same. It was not a big deal. Dross did things his ways. Dross was just being thorough, is gone four years, other benign explanations were offered some plaintiffs, I too believe that strong examinations were a necessary part of their participation in the intercollegiate athletics. That was like a hazing blotted said, according to the zoo students it always you staffer at and always you staffers complained about his behaviour as early as nineteen, seventy nine athletic department personnel. New Strong showered with teams performed a long genital emanations on athletes and refused to let a third part, a person sitting on a exams

Oh, yes, you, however, dismissed disregarded, minimized, refuted denied silenced and even concealed complaints about Strauss's misconduct at best. Unless you chose not to act and information that a larger a city, faculty staff and administrators to a substantial risk that strong was abusing plaintiffs and other male o s. You athletes so out to make a few points on the story. I think this is a really great story to highlight four one. These victims deserve justice. Ok, they're they're allegations deserve to be heard same as anyone else now. The that the men in question or the people at the university will have their US essential presumption of innocence, but this loss it will carry forward when it comes to issues of this kind of abuse. I understand the idea of believe women or believe the victim but innocent.

Until proven, prevent Europe your proven guilty. We we need a certain level of evidence to prove it thinks these things are true. This story shows us that this idea is a boy's club that protects predators because the masculine or toxic masculine. The thing is wrong. This man was abusing young males the issue as bureaucracy and pr lies and people trying to save. As if you were to ask me why wooden university. Stop this in my opinion, because they didn't want to get caught that people do. People are selfish. This is true for if it was a male victim, if as a female victim of the near the narrative about boys, clubs and how men do these things in reality, me and often our predators right, I should say this: it is often the predators. Our male men act is actually very rare

that anyone is a predator people. Who can these kinds of crimes are few and far between it's rare. So for one we should be smearing all men, but we can actually recognised that it does tend to be men when there is a perpetrator. We shouldn't you know, go after all of masculinity, because this guy's a monster. More importantly, we shouldn't make the assumption that, when it comes to how we will get away with this it simply because they are male. The issue, in my opinion, is that in all institutions being universities, but politics, Yet you know whatever pr is a lie right in this place into what I've often talked about. You will hear people say things because they want to make gains advantages. They will claim something true, but on the other to pack themselves their little lie when people call them for that

behavior. I assure you that some high ranking official who was like I do not want this on my watch and they sweep under the rug and the problem persists year after year, but it s not what the final thing I do want to bring up. As you can imagine early on, we hear a lot of criticism over title. Nine and the usual has to do with false accusations. Made against innocent guys was lies are destroyed because of it baby there their need. be some kind of reform as to how this is being misused, but at least in this instance, and at other instances we have seen what I consider to be a proper use of sunlight, absolutely their women who get justice based on tunnel on regulation and are being protected, but we ve seen people like Mark Perry of American Enterprise Institute go after programmes that do discriminate, Mr Mann and we're seeing this title.

And being used because thirty, seven former male athletes were victimized for years in the school did nothing about it, plain and simple. I want justice for victims. I don't care what, if you're, if you, if you're the victim of a false accusation, you deserve justice. If Europe, if you're the vicar of abuse years, have justice, if your male female black white Chinese looked whenever you deserve justice and the and the people who break the rules, exploit others should be which should be found out and it should be ended. Taiwan can be a tool for that unfortunate. There are problems with it, so the story hit a bunch of really good points. I think I've mailed them all, and here let me what you think of commerce blow stick around. I got one more thing that coming up in a few minutes, there's the pot gas will be starting now and I will see them China. They could. be spying on us and collecting data through drones. I kid you not. I the story and I was fascinated. The idea is, apparently, all of these big. companies are all, but none of them they make their products in China,

and they're, sending allegedly visual data back to China. There's been if other allegations to so I have a story. That's off from not that long goes from October, China accused of planting spy chips. And U S telecoms networks. I would get us if we have time well, let's first Darwins NPR story. We are not being paranoid. U s warns of spy dangers of chinese made drones. I gotta say I'm probably gonna leave lean towards if our own Companies are spying on us yeah, I'm pretty sure chinese made products are do if you can't trust Facebook and aspiring you. Why would you trust China do not spy on you? Sorry, but before we get started, this story and PR make sure you gotta TIM Kessler, complex donut. If you'd like to support my work, there's a bunch of different ways, you can donate more importantly, like an comment, because that does wonders for engagement really really helps and subscribing haven't already share the video, because that helps even more. But let's get back to the news,

Drones have become an increasingly popular tool for industry and government. Electric utilities them to inspect transmission lines. Oil companies fly them over pipelines. The interior department even deployed them to track lava flows as Hawaii use, kill, kill, ya, Callao profits are volcano, but the Department of Homeland Security is warning that drone drones manufactured by chinese companies could pose. Security rests risks, including that that that the data they gather could be stolen the departments sent out an alert on the subject on May twentieth, and a video on its website notes that drones in general pose multiple threats, including their potential use for terror, Mask Mass casualty, interference of air traffic as well as corporate espionage, an invasion of privacy. We are not being paranoid. The videos narrator adds a bit of an expert on drones. I haven't been as active in and droning for a long time

but I was I, but I believe I could be wrong. The first person to do alive broadcast via drone now it its offer a news service public. You know it's complicated, but essentially, my friends have one of the earliest drowned commercial Jones available and we stream the video from the drone to the internet. It was to cover a protest during Occupy Wall Street my understanding is that the first person to do so. I am sure, but I can say. That I went down to. I believe it's the north eastern drone coalition and was one of like one of them. When other people who chose the drowned testing site where they're doing research and exploration for universities, private sector for the governments of Europe and one of the things I have repeatedly warned people about as I'm not very active in new drone stuff. As of the past like for five years was,

potential for danger is serious. You. How do you stop a German ask you this? You see a drone carrying something flying through neighbourhood. What you do, what you do you? Let it go one of its carrying a exploited expulsion of of some sort to a target was talking a person. How do you track where it came from is extremely dangerous and I'm surprised even seem to get in fact and video games. You can do this in the game watchdogs. You can throw explosive onto the droning fly it. Why hasn't anybody'd on that? Yet I hope they don't and I'm scared they will have a serious problem, but the thought of let's, let's look, let's get away from the more stream instances and focus on more of it. her national issues and PR story says most drones bought in the. U S are manufactured in China with most of these drones made by one company d, J, Ai Technology, linear want can a cyber research scientists at Johns Hopkins University Universities, information security into said, his team does

covered vulnerabilities, indeed, J, eyes, drones. We could pull information down and upload information on a flying drone. You could also hijack the drone. The vulnerabilities meant that someone who is interested in you know where a certain pipeline network was or the vulnerabilities in a power utilities wiring might be able to access the information. I wasn't an event once the guys from vice. Flew me out to this resort in Turkey. For this big fancy meeting I was called extreme upstream and like a bunch of rich people, parting Somebody was flying a I'm, not gonna, which company, because I don't want to get in trouble, but I was able to hijack the drone became a bit of a text individual myself- and I thought I was hilarious because they work. Sumer, who bought a fancy? New toy was what was flying around and I use my found to take it over and take some pictures and then I walked over and showed them and their alike. Woe and I was really fun

I was like I was able to access your your drone. You might wanna be careful at the time there was no real security for it and I'm like that's crazy, that these things are flying around and you can easily hijacking as easy as I did. I didn't control it at all, took a photo and showed him like hey. You might want to do this and we have a good laugh about it and we drank something called a rocky later at Turkish Anas liquor and I hated it. But I digress. It was a fine day we're having a good time. There are people that new like, and the friends they say DJ. I offered a bounty for reject researchers to uncover bugs and its drones. Although Walker said John Hopkins didn't accept any money in a statement dj, I said I d J Ai safety is at the core of everything we do and the security of our technology has been independently verified by the. U S, government and leading you

Businesses dj, I, as leading industry on this topic and our technology platform, has enabled businesses and governments government agencies to establish best practices for managing their drone data. We give all customers full and complete control over how their data is collected, stored and transmitted for government and critical infrastructure customers that require additional assurances. We provide grounds that do not transfer data to D J, AI or via the internet, and our customers can enable all the precautions DS recommends every day american businesses first responders. And U S government aid he's trust dj. I drowns to help save lives, promote worker safety and support vital operations, and we take that responsibility. Very seriously, we are committed to continuously working with our customers and industry and and stakeholders to ensure our technology adheres to all of their requirements. There are other. More,

covert ways at foreign governments could obtain. The type of information gathered by drones says John Villa Centre, a fellow at the Brookings institution who teaches at the University of California LOS Angeles. If you fly a drone of pipeline is a pretty good chance. Someone is gonna, see it up there. He said, but spy, satellite just takes a picture from a hundred twenty miles up or whenever then, of course, no one's going to know what happened is not the first time government has expressed concern over the Chinese, made drowns entwine. Seventeen, the Us Army, barred use of DJ eyes drones, my understanding, it wasn't just drones, though they were concerned. think there was a conspiracy going about going around for a while that China was putting hidden wifi networks in toasters, and things like that. I think it's absolutely fascinating paranoid, but the reality is hidden. Networks are hard to implement and they really could do this. Listen. It's really really easy to run a program that brute forces someone's wifi and breaks in its also very easy that you could buy something that has a sum

a wifi chip in it that you wouldn't know about that transmits on a hidden network at you can't see brute Horses, your wifi and then transmit your personal data back. It's really easy to do this and there were fears that and it was doing this and I'd be impressed if they worked, because China certainly has capabilities. So does Russia, everybody else and we get most of our stuff made in China, which probably a bad idea, but lots of Sweden will vote. Send our said, the governments concerned over chinese drowns is not new, although the fact that it has, before us now may or may not be tied to these broader trade tensions that a flare up in recent months, the Department of Homeland secure warning about. Chinese drones coincides the Trump administrations campaign against tech, manufacture, Weiwei, which all though, coincides with the ongoing trade war between the two countries, and also officials are warning transit agencies in New York and Washington D C

hence to buying new subway cars made by a chinese manufacturer soothing Senator Mark Warner. A Democrat from Virginia along with the regions, other democratic senators has introduced desolation prohibiting the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit authority from buying the Chinese made cars because of security concerns. Railcar might have a whole host of sensors and communication tools and when that equipment is manufactured in China Warner said, and when that equipment sometimes can be operated on a remote basis. In terms of software upgraded, there are national security Applications underline the Tec concerns is the chinese government's control over all chinese companies. The communist party of now has that in their law the ability to interfere and take information from virtually every time. Company, pretty sure the you ask and Dirty U S. Companies do Warner warrant. and as long as that exists that provides a whole set of vulnerabilities. I think American, this has to consider on a going forward basis. The bottom line

of Homeland Security said, is that the customers, that is, that customers should be cautious when buying chinese technology? Now again, I wanna go with slightly. I do want to mention. Listen man, spying is happening. If you think they're, not you not being spied on, then Actually, there used to be a time when, if you believed your being spied on, your consider crazy, if you think you're, not being spied on. Today, then you're crazy right, it's it's flipped! That's how bad it is. I just after Occupy Walter. I couldn't turn my phones off, did you not. I had an android an Iphone during that was actually occupy was three times phones turned on automatically one day. I've also areas and they could never shut off. If I turn them off, they would instantly turned back on. Don't know why maybe he's a glitch, but considering you know the provenance I received around his big activists thing. Many people consider guide to different phones, that was apple and Android. They shouldn't be malfunctioning in the same way, we thought it was very funny. They also tended to get really warm

our reason, which, if you know anything about technology, means their likely broadcasting or doing something computational. Who knows what it was, but there's for a long time now been concern. that the phones we're getting that are made in China have secret technology, steals your information. Of course. It's all been denied. All the manufactures deny it, but how would you really if China created something that was designed to be untraceable. How would you really know at the same time, there will be a huge risk for China, because if we ever did find out at an international incident. anyway, I did fascinating story. I think DJ makes fantastic drones, so it is when it is welcome to the future, where everyone, spying on you and that's the disturbing memory eleven I'll leave it there. Labelling and comments below if you're, watching listening in the pot ghastly but leave a review, is greatly appreciated.

Thanks rang out, and I will see you all tomorrow at ten, a M youtube com slashed him cast for the latest news.