As you are watching this video, I am probably said: at the White House I have no idea how the alot know how long the event is supposed to go on form. But today is the White House. social media summit. There are a lot of people, for attending, who, I think our questionable individuals and that's fine, but I hope I bring some some US rationality and facts, to this discussion whatever it may be. I think a lot of people who mealy jump the gun and there was a grand conspiracy against someone in reality is actually like human behavior nuanced circle. Stances. But yes, I do. Leave, there's a bias or are particularly against conservatives, mostly stemming from the fact that the people oh, build and moderate these systems are liberal. Not then it's a grand conspiracy, it's just that things are, are slowly falling. One direction due to the structure of how social media works and how these media companies work. But, of course, because I will be there I am being smeared quite dark heavily and it's all good. It's all good fun. I gotta say you know, there's a point. I think maybe like

their occupy Wall Street. When a smear started coming out, you can look, you get any kind of attention and people. Haters start coming there was one guy who was. It was now like of no use arrests, unfairly charges for being like anti far something for attacking some guys, but he would like come to events and it It's me of stealing like eighty grand from occupied ridiculous nonsense, but as go higher, unlike into in terms like as you grow in terms of public appear like public notability, the smooth Let's get more sophisticated media matters has I'll put out too. I mean they're, not really smear a kind of smears. It's like false framing to try let me look bad or something, but I have to say there there we're gonna go through a bunch of a smear so far and their quite fun. So I think you are joy this this segment? We have media matters it's a story from the ninth it's been updated and at First, I was kind of upset they didn't know. It was including me in the smears ass. I come on man, I'm coming to the event to why won't you tell people

I'm gonna be there well. First, there's a problem, see temples, progressive tax, I have made several videos going into great detail about. Why believe the progressive tax is the right thing no choice. I have also made several videos going into great detail about why I believe pro choice is the right thing. I'm actually pro public healthcare in a sense pro you be, I'm not spoken out against universal basic income quite a bit, so I thought it would make sense to actually have come. europhile. I really feel for grand scheme vision of the future. I think it over. Basic income, universal health care and universal? education are actually things we should fight to attain. I dont believe we can obtain them oh so as such I'm kind of reformist, and I think we are, slowly moving those directions, so I'm pro public healthcare, pro social programmes and to an extent pro you be-

The problem with you be I, and why so I say to an extent as it's very hard to implement correctly, and I dont think what a technical to technological level to attain that. Yet, maybe maybe, but I think, a future that is a very star trek, like future with Locators, unlike you know, you very equal society like Starbucks, a great thing to strive for, but it's not communist like unequal, would argue so you'll, be I to me is kind of like. Can we get to that point, let's, let's white, to do it, but if it's not possible, let's not hold our breath universal health care, I think, is something we absolutely should get no matter what, but it can't be done overnight. And it certainly that can be done in this administration, but I'm gonna want around about my politics, will break them down as we go through the smear medium. Earth called me. Extremists, oh wow here, are the extremists figures going to the White House Social media summit, and they start with, El Mitchell, who I dont know carpet downtown. I also don't know. Charlie Kirk is We're copied carbon atoms, the means misguide, Charlie Orchestra,

Want you say, Prager University. Is you know social media content? We have been garrison who was removed. He makes cartoons. I love. This will Chamberlain. I actually kids of all all these people I know of some of them, but will I would, I would actually consider a friend though it's not like we hang out or anything because I've had a man You know my gentle several times and I talked to him. You know fairly often not much much better consumer front and they said that Chamberlain pushed a likely hoax smearing protesters at a sort of speaking about that's it. He tweeted out some up a banner from an event and the next one. Is he? pushed a smear from far right, troll linking journalists to anti fought, so he wrote a story where he quoted collect and sad deep, their trust, for the that's all they have on will, after years of participants, regulations, media matters? That's that's it! That's all you could get come on wheels way, more, politically active and my other than outcome.

man, I'm not even right wing as much of that they like to claim. I am, but here's the best part keep us in mind. They claim you pushed a smear from afar right, troll, ok, ok, check this out. You guys we're gonna love this you're you're you're good friend Mr Poul is, puts merely the direct center of a network of far right Youtube accounts, they actually say a study found paused at the near sent doesn't mean anything. This is fake. The ultra influencer network thing is fake, but don't worry it's funny now? First, he claimed that well, Chamberlain was pushing a smear from a troll linking plus two anti thought? It's quite literally identical to this? It's the same kind of crime where, with little dots, point in different directions, so their mad that our conservative did the same thing, but then think it's justifiable to criticise, for what some unlocked it's a little, the same thing not now, here's the best part they and near the centre literally doesn't

Anything I'm sure they know what does it mean anything. The Sunday just means I've interacted with people on how that its literally they draw it. This was drawn none of it make sense. There is no data deciding who will be and what point of this and more importantly, the connections are fake. I am not exaggerating their literally fake. Some of them are real funny, but their fake. Like that connection, we too Stephan Manu, like dude, I met the guy one time like six months after the him out and it was like in passing. Whereas item ok, nice to meet you how's, it literally the extent to which I've ever interact with the guy. Catch me with a bunch of other people like destiny. Destiny is like a left wing. Twitched dreamer. I've never talk to the guy never indicted, barely know who he is so so so so it's funny that they climate being theirs under. So I guess I, your mastermind, that's the joke, but here's the great thing they claim. A study found me near the center, but then literally go on to say that I pushed a far

the troll linking journalists to anti far, which is the same exact, like kind of study. But here is the best part. The YO. I did actually was critical of the study sang. Take it with the grain of salt, because these crimes, web things are used to smear people like they ve done to me, and I said just because someone may have interacted with Antiphon Twitter doesn't mean they support them, but I can't say some of these journalists, absolutely our anti fraud, which is why I said verified journalists are exposed working with Cuba What's funny that there are going to use a discredited, fake study is literally fake. I will say that a statement of fact is: it is fake, then go on to claim that someone else's study was vague, we'll talk about double standards what's up, but there there's the first smear, which is fine, but don't worry. I got a lot here. Take it up this one from view White House hosts social media summit. With social media companies. Now this one's funny because it was updated today in the morning.

And yesterday I tweeted to the author Bill Admin mines. The sea, always social media company, is in fact invited. There are just not inviting big tech. Why? Perhaps it's because Jack Dorsey was just at the White House. These people have lost it. Ok, listen trot literally had Backdoors advice. What like a few weeks ago is gonna, be ok, come on back off, you gotta say. Maybe I should talk to other people in the space with experience in this matter and thus they allotment, ceo of attack platform has been invited, but but but but wait, don't worry. As much as VOX is trying to falsely frame. The summit is now even having social media companies when they are vice, takes it one better check this out, then Mapuche says so I just found out that fringe site minds that come once a choice place for NEO Nazi Melton groups will be. At tomorrow's social media summit at the White House, but twitter and Facebook weren't invited my story from motherboard. Wow

you're the story from other ward. Was this? Do mines and found like for accounts and flag them and they got banned, and that it and look at what he says once a choice place is at a joke, more fringes tree, mists use facebook and twitter. Facebook, twitter and Youtube are literally choice, places way more than mines is, and here's what they write. Shrugged, invites fringe social media company popular with Nazis to the White House. It just literally not true minds, actually isn't that popular with with with Nazis its nonsense and so what my response to the sky was for. Those are familiar. this guy is he's been an angle legal battle, because he's refuse to turn over chat logs with ISIS too, to law enforcement. What do you think I could say about him, then that Ben Mapuche unknown collaborator? He guide. I tweeted this, make a point. I don't literally think is collaborating get eastern journalism. This isn't journalism so why

thanks again smear a small tech company in protection of massive billion that white. Why are you defending face book of all people? Mark Zuckerberg, creepy invades our privacy, but sure enough. All of these people rushed to the defensive facebook if it means owning the cons, these people have lost it. How have we come to a point where regular Americans with no power, are our protest against massive corporations that suppressed speech and they rushed to the to the defence of massive corporations. Like I, these people claim to be left but like as far as I can tell their like pro corporate meal libertarians there like their love, the Coca brothers What why do you protect this industry, its nonsensical to me so there's Billy another smear peace cousin cause media matters. They are here we go, and so this is mere peace. They put out a day later and theirs.

the White House social media on it is just another stunt to game the rafts. So here is about doing this one. Let me break down when they try to claim against me as proof it sucks. So first they claim that I offer little more than speculation other than detect de context utilised anecdotes. Ok, I have, I have now claimed or even if I did, I apologize it's hard to track litter believing, but I have been repeatedly of the opinion that there is no grand. conspiracy is a series of anecdotes that prove a biased. Now I understand the plural anecdotes, not data the issue. As Jack Dorsey said, perhaps we were too aggressive policing this mean as a right wing activists Jack. Where's. He said our conservative employees are afraid to speak up. Google documents have been leaked. Those art anecdotes, the leaked Google documents are evidence in context referring to right wing individuals, conservatives as fringe far extremists, statements from

employees, as well as a breaking news story from gives MOTO proving that Facebook employs routinely suppressed conservative news. That is not an anecdote that is former staffer speaking to a left wing media outlets, saying yes, we do this. That is evidence at least one bit proving social media companies did or- or I have at least at some point- held a bias against conservatives. So they're wrong. They gonna say that like me to meet my video google email leaked proves conservative censorship. It literally does its literate. it's an email from a staff member saying we know this or bad. Can we suppress them? So that's! That's! That's proof of censorship I'm not saying that there is a grand conspiracy of people. One year nom, saying literally the employers saying we are biased. We want to censor people so try to take it to the extremes. They go and then try and claim that this tweet, instead out, I said David network was banned because of a book he wrote and the symbols on the book. So I tweeted see when you

advocate for censorship that will always backfire as the sit na effort. I started to many times. Ella well, do getting suspended, ok, but for real. Why can't these people ever learn I think most of you understand the context of the tweet. I'm not Chile celebrating I'm getting suspended, in fact the video eight about it was. I was all for him to be retort like reinstated, and he should absolutely about be allowed. the speech, as might might might consistent stance on speech left right, whatever people have a right to propose their images and call these people out of course, media matters is trying to claim that its approve of. inconsistency in my free speech crusade. Oh please, it's called whoosh the point: what over your head, they then bonnet I claim this very well white nationalistic argument that the reason conservatives, are bad boys because they break the rules. More sounds familiar to what the racist trying claim about crime in United States. They don't seem to have a consistent understanding of logic, plain and simple

now. The issue is the rules themselves are biased against conservatives, of which I do leave they go on to claim that they said poor Poole S pushed this one specific rules and example of twitter being biased against conservative? in reference to actually less. Let's, let's read pause, asserted that twitter, by definition, is a biased platform in favour of a left period. As proof pool point the fact that twitters harassment policy bans miss gendering of Trans people, never mind that twitter bans all sorts of things. For instance, just this week the site expanded to table arctic policy as it relates to dehumanizing language use against people on the basis of religion, full stop criticising me for something I said before a rule was enacted. That makes literally no sense and my point remains valid, Miss Jane ring is something that only exists among progressive ideology. Even moderate liberals don't agree with your with this policy. So, yes, it is an idea logical bias. Predominantly talk

conservatives who are very outspoken in opposition to this. So I dont know what else I have put Oh yeah. I have a couple more stories. I go through the daily. What will summer, who called me right wing like dude? I don't. I don't care what you call me it's like. Are you trying to scare me by saying I'm right wing? It's like upstart, some left of the old to the left of Obama, but they say trot social media summit, mortified, Whitehouse, enrages, far right allies? Ok, p brings up a good point in that there is a lot of people who are throwing a fit that some of us have been invited. There's people saying why haven't any of the people band been invited, let me try and bring something down. Look. I was it was its work Trump playing it safe, apparently not because no matter what all of these measures are still coming out, but it is important that people like me and bill ottoman among others, go to this event and speak up about the pot, the pre

some of massive unaccountable billion dollar corporations suppressing speech and injecting their morality. I have argued. I have no right to you two recommendations and I believe that still true to the state, if you too, wants to promote me that something different than hosting me, my speech is not suppressed, simply because you won't run mandate now, there's a good point that bill brought up. I mentioned the stem saying that if you, if you sign up for a website and tell These are the terms that term should be applied evenly. I can respect that, but I still don't believe. Recommendations are right, However, I recognise that if you tube the second biggest search engine in the world, ways their search in favour of the left where they massive public crisis, and we and allow massive billion dollar corporations to use this, and be essentially, you know if, if, if it ends up favouring polish politicians who make videos, could that not be an incline donation? recommending someone like Andrew Yang, for instance, what's the value of

Recommendation is, and is, that illegal in kind donation or essentially illegal? If in a report at the bigger issues, we need to get people who can come to the event who probably our little safe, although they definite brought people who are not safe, who can actually try and make some change happen. I'll, stick sex dynamic, called on me and many others to do not go to the summit and I think it's a terrible idea. I've tremendous respect for next. I think it has great work and I think you know that is a pretty good do. It stands on principle, but I disagree disregard its as much as I don't like the fact that Ban garrison was this invited because once again we're seeing the media play games smears. I think it's important to actually go and try and get look, I'm a moderate, I'm, not a conservative as much as they were there. Smear mused, extremist right wing whenever none of it makes sense. I'm gonna be of the few people. If not, the only person at this event was actually

disparities, Donald Trump- and I do it a lot. Ok, I I have said crude and crass things about Trump and called him crude and cress plan simple. I don't it from the range and syndrome so my cut my political prejudice position is kind of like I'm, not a fan of him he's kind of bad, but he's not that bit right. not that bad in the sense that, like they, think he's literally reincarnation of a certain leader of World WAR, two Germany, if you dont, have it yet. I don't agree that as nonsense. I think he's done some. Some he's got some bad character flaws which I think are bad for a leader. I think it results in division and an divisiveness I think he's he speaks to often off the cuff speaks that thinking these things ultimately are divisive and uncritical of them so it's important that someone who has been been willing to openly criticised and we'll be there as well. Personally, I think they should have more to bring in more leftwing voices there, certainly people who could have come by this is an issue of. Do they know about them and do they trust them? I think David Pachmann would have been a great individual, too

there's, especially considering he's been covering this you to push towards pro corporate content, which is another big problem. We're seeing these outlets, like vice, like vocs like media matters, are acting in defence of massive corporations in the mainstream media or big tech giants. I can quite understand it. Media matters claims eight claims to hate Fox NEWS, but their acting in defence of massive corporate infrastructure. Why? I don't know David Batman for love? Em right am, I think I like it Work, I think, is a good job. I disagree with a lot with some other stuff. He does, but that's normal. Ultimately, I think, he's professional unease companies willing to try to talk to people and as one of the most important things we can see from progressives he's been covering how Youtube has been promoting corporate voices and suppressing MA, and his voice and other independent craters as a really important. You know perspective to bring to the White House. The white else could have done more, or to bring liberal and progressive voices who are good faith actors and want to speak up there. Certainly anti war leftwing active,

people like Jimmy Door or on Uk Lick, who I think would have been good to bring as well, not saying they would have accepted the invite? A lot of lifting individuals may have said absolutely not my stance and probably why they smear maritime is probably due to the fact that someone like Trump or conservative, says: let's have a conversation a solution. My response is: ok, I'm willing to hear what you have to say. Where's many people on the left are saying: don't do it. You can look at me. The soccer star and again I reckon on syphon present anymore. Who said she wouldn't accept the invite and I think it's very important- to accept the invite and to meet them on their terms and say: here's what I think you're doing wrong. Here's why I think you're wrong, but here's what we need we need to solve and I think a lot of the people who who follow me, especially these people will be at the event who are outside it. See me there- no, we disagree greatly but It's interesting that you have so many conservatives who saying let's have a conversation and figure out what the solution as and on the left, just dreams. You know nazi over and over again. Sorry, that's not gonna solve anything. That's gonna make things worse. So I will answer. It leads to the point about sticks, I'm gonna, be there

and I'm gonna try and temper a lot of the more like on unconcern Is there going to be a lot of more like right? Wing conspiracy minded individuals, I think, even with like James O'Keefe, he's put a bunch of evidence, and he has this. This opinion about Y intercept is happening. You think I disagree with him of it, even with as evidence that we can both agree on. I think one The bigger issues is pro corporate pro establishment, predominantly anti conservative, because trumped supporters are anti establishment. Populists tromp was not supposed to win, so does primarily affect those trump supporters, but it also does impact liberal individuals like David Patent getting suppressed and riot Gaelic has been silenced and there are other people were smeared by the southern, probably law centre like Ben Norton. I believe- and I say forgetting other names out. So I apologise, but I do think that its eight a pro establishment pro elite pro corporate pro status quo. That's targeting those who dare challenge the system for the most part does target conservatives because at least establishment does hold some

moral values, so not only to the target the anti establishment they target. Conservatives, if you're on the left- and you agree with the progressive narrative but challenge that the oligarchy of these of big tack and corporate media they shut you down occupy Wall Street activists. Have shut down. People like global revolution. People I personally do not like and do not like me- lapses. imagine they have shut on Occupy Wall Street activists. This is a serious problem, primarily that big tech should not be the arbiters of truth and morality, and I want to go there and let's talk about it. The last thing I will say It is a really great peace. Strangely from Fox news about minds, doc majesty. I am I Undine stock that is working really hard to bring about a human layer of moderation, the jury system. How did we come to a point? In my life, a lifelong, like Democrat, levelling individual,

where vice is smearing and lying about minds who's trying to actually you don't fight back against extremism and Fox NEWS, doesn't a great long for peace, breaking down the solution, the plan, the problem and how the social media site works. While I should say long for little bit long. How is Fox news becoming the real newsman belong to me, even Donald. others slamming Fox news is becoming to moderate what a weird world we live in but no one knew that will let out so maybe I'm out already. I have no idea, but thanks running out sit around, I will have more segments coming up at six p m at Youtube COM slashed him cast news, and I will see well then, this come as a shock to many of you, but Barack Obama actually deported three million people around. I think that's number. They called him. The porter and chief and Barack Obama actually operate in detail

Jen centres where children had to sleep on mats under mylar, blankets. Now I'm being facetious. Most of you probably know this because you pay attention to politics, but it's really bad when the Democrats are trying to smear Trump and they accidentally put out a photo from the Obama administration. Now that's bad, but it's actually worse because then they, put out another worker hope from the Obama administration, because for some reason today, Barack Obama is far right, Now I know why this is okay. I M a general idea of how Barack Obama went from being a socialist too far right and then it has to do with the media. Just going insane and chasing miss psychotic narrative? There was a graph that I showed a while ago, a researcher Doug through a database called Lexus Nexus.

and we can see that around the beginning of twenty ten, which is you know in starting with in brackets bombers tenure. You see a massive spike, a hockey stick on the graph for all of these identities area terms. It's not so much that people actually believe in this we are needed terrorism, it's just that the media continually chases a fringe narrative to attract viewers as they decay and fall apart. what they accuse us on Youtube of doing. They actually do themselves tenfold, and thus, you end up with this from the Daily Collar House Democrats use photo from Obama administration to promote investigation into inhuman treatment at the border. Now look I'm fine with that? If you want to show this photo and say, we should definitely investigate this I'll, say spot on investigate for sure we need accountability for the federal government. Here's the thing, though They deleted the image. What where we will hold on, I thought you were upset about inhuman treatment

and your specifically referring to one Obama, did because all agree with you. We should investigate that now there met it Trump, They want to excuse Obama. The best part is that, according to the story, they actually put out another bad fordable if a Threed daily collar right? House Democrats tweeted a photo from President Barack Obama's administration to promote their investigation into inhuman treatment, inhumane treatment at the border before deleting the tweet Thursday. the committee on Oversight and reform announced a hearing advisory set for Wednesday titled kids in cages. And inhumane treatment at the border over twitter. The hearing we'll be examining this alone: and inhumane treatment after members of the committee witness to the grotesque treatment of children, the announcement meant to be for the inhumane treatment allegedly occurring under President Donald Trump between included a photo, but there was just one problem: the picture included in the tweet of children in care.

Jazz was from the Obama administration. According to President Donald trumps, twenty twenty presidential campaign, the photo was quickly deleted, such as our civil rights and civil liberties subcommittee hearing kids in pages, inhumane treatment at the border, and that was yesterday, and so we have Trump war room. as Democrats are promoting their civil rights hearing on kids in cages and inhumane treatment, with a photo from twenty fourteen when Joe Biden was vice. President Obama, but wait here is the best part. The house Democrats are wrong are were wrong, with this photo they treated another one as I mentioned, but it's you butter because they know look at a story from that The collars well emigrant activists, Storm Biden, headquarters demand here, poligized deportations, something really weird- is happening on the left,

period. Immigration activists still well aware that bite and plays a huge role in the detention of children and mass deportations and they're calling about for it yet give the Democrats are blaming Trump for what Obama did. This is what really bothers me when trying to talk politics I am to the left of world Obama was in fact I think: bomber Obama screwed up the public public healthcare and all that stuff. I think we should have gone full public option. A lot of people wanted our universal. here, but I usually fall into look I dont, know what they were. They disagreed and I dont know if, if a bomb, I couldn't do it, I don't know why you couldn't do it. It's tied to the economy, its difficult, I think more could have been done and there should have been more leadership. But the point is on a lot of issues. I was to the left of Amr in like him, I didn't especially on foreign policy. I thought the due to a lunatic. You blown up kids in common enemy combatants, observed

that the people he blew up, then he called out into combatants were military age males right, but I have no. I have no. I will. I will give no respect for a bomb in that regard. It is charismatic for sure, but how do we get to appoint now where Trump is being blamed for what a bomb a star Now don't get me wrong. We have had an ongoing crisis on the border and the board of civilized aren't getting better. But again, it's weird thing that we see among activists where they really believe the President is like the supreme chancellor and it's kind of disconcerting. The president can't do that much because of most of you might know later today, I will be the White House Social media summit. I dont message early, no wise communicating conversation, but the present I can't Think about this law. There are laws in place there look. It is true that face

Twitter, Youtube, etc. They are private companies. I think the conversation needs to be had in our lawmakers needed before with some kind of assessment of how these companies are kind of taking it both ways acting as publishers and platforms. While getting you know, immunities not granted to any other company, so I think, is an important conversation. But what can the president really do? Ok, I'm! Nothing is powerless that the president is by all means measurements, one of the most powerful people on the planet. If not, but that's in terms of eggs. active authority, meaning when it comes to using a drowned it around the there's, a lot power behind that drug has executive authority and that he can tell you can tell within the com kinds of existing law law enforcement. What to do that? Basically it

If you want, you can declare war, not an act of Congress like Congress declares we're not even the president can do that, although we ve seen it and that's where the big problems out with executive bright. What the point is its, I feel, like everything were seeing these. This was a huge mistake. They screwed up bad ok by posing these bees, Obama photos, but I think the reason they blame trucks. everything is just so they can win twenty twenty and for me, as like, a sane, rational kind of centrist centre left individual, I'm looking for a real reason debate. I want you to like I like liked: Elsie Gabert. Ok, she recently put out the sweet talking about no war. No private presents no on drugs, free speech online and on why? I really liked Elsie I'll say it, I'm the one us today, but I have disparage tromp based on his behaviour. The way he mocked body slamming the reporter- and he did that thing with you know him a mock the reporter with a disability. Whatever your opinion, as I find him to be, I would prefer a precedent.

who was more collected and charismatic trunk can be strong all those things. It's fun honest alot of people like him, because he is willing to be grass and crude and say no and give you the finger bets on the person that I feel should be representing my country. Now there are other issues that that backdrop has done in reference to foreign policy, that I've been extremely critical of one of the first things that happened and again check the source on. This has been a long time has been years a commando written Yemen. Shortly after tromp was inaugurated result The death of an eight year old american girl weapons Jealous Saudi Arabia, missile strikes in Syria, and these things are often go to because you eat you. You can tell why think tells you gabarus import Anti war, but I will say for all the bad things I can say about trumps personality. In my opinion, the IRAN pullback excellent excellent decision. Please thank you. Thank you! Sparing human lives, it's not worth it. It was the right move and wars, bad and

North Korea is our credit, but anyway I'm I want to draw attention to this point. Is oh bomber, did a bunch of really bad things, including this, and I feel like is innocent, disingenuous bad faith, effort to try and get trot to lose re election and set of actually solving these problems. I look at what troubles that a foreign policy, and I said I don't like it. I dont like it the news that the later things there are no great. I do like it. What is it regrets have to offer, because I'm looking for someone like atolls he gathered, but of course they won't give it to her. You know she will never get anywhere near. You know what she needs. In fact, it actually breaks my heart, Andrew Yang. I like him too,

I like to see a little bit more for a lot of reasons. It's at this minute back and forth admitted it. I've been in a strange that First Yang is, I think, you'd better now collect notes Elsie, but the issues like Yang, actually blue tools, have the water in terms of donations, and so on till she is very presidential she's. U no major in the National Guard man. I really really hope she advanced forward, and I would I would I would be shocked,

if you actually when the primary, but that would be like a really powerful moment. I think so, and I want to stress to as much as a lot of people don't agree with her on issues like gun rights and operations are things and not necessarily there with her either. I don't agree with the minimum wage proposal of fifteen dollars nationally with her, but she cover so many really important issues and and and the core issue being at a war. Here is the main point of trying to bring up with us. What we have here is an attempt to smear trump for for what Obama did and when you actually have principled, common sense. Politicians like Yang and gathered there there get there they get their MIKE's cut. They put a fake pimple until his face is something like a game and believe that's true, but Tm Z reported it, and so the boiling point that, like a kid you not it was reported, and you can see the video does it affect them, glorifies, that's what they do to the real principle. Common sense Democrats a try, speaking up and saying hey, let's do something here

a real, a real opportunity. It's like they want Trump to win this gaff. This huge mistake, littlest worm, says here in red, is the portion of the twenty fourteen photo used by the House Democrats to the AP fact check photo wrongly used to hit trump policies. This gaff is good for Trump. The far left push they do on stage. It's like they want trump to win. It's mind blowing to me, even though time's up. I was saying they ve learned nothing from twenty sixteen and then we have them I was element it. Let me finish: read the story. They say after deleting the tweet, the Oversight Committee put up a second tweet with a different photo this one was also from the Obama administration, according to their public in House Oversight Committee and the AP, the tweet was also deleted. The hill also did this. when they put a photo of children cages from the Obama administration for an article about trumps detention centres. They keep doing it and you know what how hard as it affects, check wise. The daily call was able to be like yet that,

photo from of Amr. Why is it that the Trump WAR and was able to say that's a photo from above, but the Democrats couldn't do this? The hill couldn't do this, and so here's, the other point I would bring up Joe Biden- was vice president Obama did a whole bunch of really screwed up things, and I think that that the track record of the Obama administration, for that is substantially worse than where Trump is right now, so let us make one thing: clear: Trump is only a couple years into his first term: he's got what will see the reelection it's looking that way: Obama Thro his entire term was using the kill list. The disposition matrix, ok, use deporting mass deportation he had kids in cages. Where were these people to stand up next to me when I was calling this out along with many other anti war activists, and that's what bothers me about, but I will say this just because you weren't there then doesn't mean I'm mad, that you're you're coming up now I get it ok, I agree. Foreign policy from America styles always been bad

trunk. I did some good things recently, where they do they slam for saying no war with IRAN. It is I ain't blowing to me trumps pulse back and where they do, we always hit Pisa sang Trot, pulled back a strike. He ordered can't make up his mind at presidential. I'm like yes, yes, it is okay, if you find out you're, making a bad decision, and you have a crisis of morality, and you said we can't do this. We can't kill these people. I will stand up and I will plug you saying it was. It was wrong to do the strike, but I respect you for canceling it. The people who didn't call it Obama when he was president. It was wrong if you did not call him out, then what is right of you to call out the bad behavior

Unfortunately, many of these people excused everything Obama did and today are slamming Trump for being anti war or forties. Having won it, let you know IRAN was one moment. Ok, I'm gonna say it: we don't. We dont trade lives. We dont there. There is no making up for the attacks we ve seen in Yemen for the loss of life in Yemen for the missile strikes in Syria. There is nothing you can do that will make. It reaches zero right enough, as watching have seen Jessica Jones bows Watchings is one recently couldn't, could kill. Remsen amazing marvelling if you're not familiar he's like a sociopath guy

who can command people to do Everley whatever he wants, he's killed a bunch of people, Michel right and so trying to win over the main character. He says how many people do have to save, to get back to zero and she's shocked like you can't there is nothing you can do, and so that's it that's the important point, o bombers entire, an entire tenure, his is is eight years is marred by foreign policy. Faint failures by actual extra judicial assassinations. So far, Trump has done some things that have actually kind of been a positive with North Korea and with IRAN in those are good things and any other credit for it. He's done bad things, so it's still a negative, but I feel like if Trump remains on a path where he avoids both IRAN. I'm gonna have to agree Genk. Huger of the young Turks plain and simple, Jack said: if, if tromp keeps us out of war with IRAN, he will have been a better president than George W Bush. People got mad because for some reason they want a romanticize would Bush was now wish was awful. He was the predecessor,

to our Obama, started doing it's all bad, but if trunk and walked back these policies, he will be better than George W Bush and that's Genk Yucas opinion and I'm than agree with him. So what so, anyway, you know. Look it's weird to me that we're sitting a position where immigrant activists year storm by net quarters, demand he apologized for deportations, the activists no, they know about, this, but for some reason they keep trying to claim trumps at fault, for what Biden and Obama did could you not. There was an interview world where bite and said the russian interference wouldn't have wouldn't have happened on my or Brock's watch slight. Do what you were all that's literally. What happened it just politics? Is it costing game and, if you're somebody who actually want a solution to the problems facing our world, this is not. How do you go about it and that's true for Trump? Ok, that's true for everybody

there's gonna be a wider social media summit. I firmly believe nothing will get done, but but there is a chance there's a chance at a high level. Conversation can be had. I am extremely grateful and with great respect and and honour that accept this invitation invitation, I'm not trying to be in a jar court or condescending or disrespect one anyway. I just think when it comes to politicking nothing ever happens. We see all these people the federal government of crimes, how often have actually indicted it just feels like it's all stupid game. You know we're gonna wanna hit pieces coming out about the social media on it and I'll get into this later, but seriously, there saying it's. Pilots politicking its trump railing, a bunch of proton personalities while its technically true. I am certainly no programme

banality, so I can. I do have respect for them. Inviting me they ve also invited bill oddments Sea of mine sue. I do not fully God Mama, but words. It is not by pressure, is not approach of individuals more about liberties for expression. Things like that. So it's not one sided, but I do think a bit of this is about Trump recognising he needs that social media power for reelection- and I dont think you know any of these people the. Whilst we have the power to actually change anything. I feel like all we really see as an influence or, and that means lying, cheating and stealing and others. I think they be done to stop it so anyway, instead of being this video three hours long, I'm trying to get all of my work done really really quickly, because the summit is is today. I have to be done before, like one p m, so I ll leave it there thanks rang out sick or on the next. Video will be at one And I will see you all their aside for another tale of me to backfire the story from the Huffington Post, Mississippi GEO, p candidate, nice journalist campaign trip interview since she's a woman is actually more

complicated than the headline would have. You believe that it is technically true, although I think they could do better if they actually told you what happened because look most people will read the headline move on and, if you just where this headline it sounds like he's just a sexist prick in reality, he's there's two things here for one The journalists disclaiming. Essentially he heeded wanna, be accused of an affair. He is claiming for his wife. They have an agreement not to be privately. with people of the opposite sex to religious thing, and he doesn't want to be accused of an affair. They say state rap. Robert fosters campaign directed our campaign director told journal, Levison Campbell, they would only go for with the interview if a male journalist was present now see you gotta Read it to actually figure out what really happened, but I gotta say it does feel like a backlash to them to error, because we ve seen many Circumstances now, where men are straight up, saying I'm not going to be alone with you, we ve heard story.

that men are refusing to mentor women that in office buildings, men have an open door policy. Now the door must always be open if a woman is gonna come and talk to him, because there is a concern about being falsely accused It happens, like us he's on sorry was with smeared over a bad day Chris hard, but I think it was the guy from it would have it S. M show was falsely accused of ever pretty. He lost his job, they brought him back ever investigation. So, yes, it does happen. I'm not saying every single instance is false. Every accusation is false. I'm just saying for one: nobody wants to be he was having an affair I'll be all over the press to what, if some When does falsely accused you, this is what you get. You get mail me up the men who are of power who say it's not worth it? I can't do it so freedom of unopposed rights, campaign of Mississippi Republican Gubernatorial, candidate and state RAP Robert Foster denied.

A journalist, request to shadow him on a campaign trip, because she is a woman. The reporter wrote in an essay rushed in Mississippi today on Tuesday evening and well. What will soon weakening it from there. Journalists, Levison Campbell, said the campaign director, coltan, Rob Robinson, told told her. She could ride along with foster for day trip only if she brought a male colleagues along according to Campbell. Alison said he was concerned about the public perception of them being together that, if Tracker assault fostering Campbell, they could use it to insinuate an extra marital affair. After consulting with her editor, she said both on principle telling often imposed it was a sexist request and big newsrooms are stretched. Then and she was shocked that, even after offering other solutions like making shortly visibly wearing her press badge all day, they continued to deny or copper request this. Why things he's in she's wrong on this one, when you

actually read on you learn this guy's falling was called the Billy grandma Billy Gram rule, which will read the real issue that he says is that him at his wife in it have an agreement that he won't be along with a woman. She won't be alone with men, as you know, as there as part of their marital bud. I look your religion, you do you, it would it makes sense that if she said how a veto, if she is claiming you dont, want to look bad like that, like that could be having an affair it, is possible, even if she's in a full view of the public, people could still assume as an affair, but it sounds more to me like he doesn't want to be alone with one for other reasons, because if he was visible with their that would cut off that a lot of any sort you're any speculation, especially when your press badge and she's recording m people would be like. Ok get it and it's not going to see her again right it sounds like you actually does. Follow what they call the Billy Gram, but let us redone quote they put the onus on me as a woman to make Rhett foster feel comfortable when it was his issue and his rule.

Who are not entitled to anyone's time period, give you any reason for why I won't do an interview with this. This is this is the most is absurd part of a story that she's outrage that you Do an interview with her dude. I do not intervene. Requests like five times a day I ignore most of them and for some some people get my phone number and number as my phone anymore. I say no, I say no to literally all of them The only areas I've done recently has been one for the hill, turning to the social media on it, I don't trust interviewers ass. These outlets and no you're not entitled To my time I can give you The reason I want, but she's she sang the onus, is on her as a woman to make him feel comfortable. Well, yeah you're, the journalist trying to get him to read you his time. It's really crazy to me. There was a point in my Career where we're gonna get out of speaking offers, they worked paid, and I too speaking agent and this meeting agents had to me. Listen, you are the product

They need to sell you to make money if they are not offering you anything. Their wasting your time. The same is true, for this. Why that, though, the journalist needs the quote from the politician, she needs the enemies from the palace there is no obligation for him to give her anything and if he has special terms because of his marriage. or because the public perception that's on you period. So, ultimately, I was told, listen to him, you're, the entertainment for these events. You should get paid for it, no matter what I said: yeah but like you know some of us have a lot of money. Is it so what they want to put an event and they need something from you. The applicant there has to be some kind of consideration, some exchange of value. Maybe the value get us a high profile event you're willing to do it, but the end of the day there putting an event and you are their entertainment and I'm like that's a good point and I, for the most part, haven't done a speaking. I've turned on most. We can get since a lot of a lot of gigs. Want you to come in accommodate them

I'm gonna happen, but I do have an event coming up August. Thirty. First, in the Philadelphia area, I r l dot minds that calm check it out. I got a further plugin. Won't I, and about it must be done in an email, foster, told half post. The decision was based on a commitment he and his wife made to follow the quote: Billy Gram rule a practice named after evangelical pastor, who did not spent time alone with women who are not his wife, which is to avoid any situation that may evoke suspicion or compromise of our marriage I am sorry Miss capital. Does it share the same views, my decision was out of respect for my wife character and our christian Faith Foster said he treated a similar response. Tuesday night foster told her post, he wouldn't mind granting Campbell an interview. We just wanted to be in an appropriate and professional setting that wouldn't provide opportunities for us to be alone. I look, listen

If you, if you are, this, is normal, it's absolutely normal that when I reject someone for an interview, there's a here's, what I can do and here's what I can do it and I have to accommodate them period. So, Campbell said the Billy. Granville rationale was never presented to her. Instead, the campaign spoke to her about the concern that quote. Trackers would try to me can look bad. He never mentioned anything about his wife or having that agreement with his wife beforehand. She said: that's not his problem, that's not his issue to explain! Perhaps he was kind of embarrassed and you forced him to come out and talk about his paw. percent of with his wife. Maybe he said explicitly, they didn't want it. to be insinuations on an extramarital affair. That literally falls in I was the idea of the Billy Gram, rural. Maybe you are now. Forcing him to step up and reveal details about his personal life that this shit,

sheer gall of so many journalists to think they're up a special class of people that are just so elite that there are leanest and entitled to what you to you and your time, not with reason the professional barriers women face as a result of optics is not unique to the journalism industry. A study last may, from lean and organ survey monkey found that sixty percent of male managers said they're, not comfortable, engaging in work activities with women, including mentoring, a thirty three percent increase in the year before Yes, it's literally the me to era. Men don't want to be accused. I am now going to risk anything happened it with my life to accommodate you when I dont have do. I owe you nothing. You deserve nothing from me and if you want something from me. The most work out how to make it. You know best available to you, but if I decide for any reason, you can't talk to me one. So be it Campbell spoke to foster. First on Saturday, he appeared on middle but seemed somewhat enthusiastic Campbell told how Post Robinson call

your backs on the afternoon and they talked about the details of the trips, yet it they would go down to the Gulf Coast on Thursday a couple of hours from Jackson, then they come up through a few towns in the southern part of Mississippi it'd, be around a fifteen hours a day. In total, it's not a small time commitment gamble said, but a great opportunity for a window. into the campaign she wanted. Fifteen hours of his time, man is it is sheer audacity of the journalist class to think fifteen hours, someone's entire day, eight hours, an hour's asleep yet sixteen hours, so you You sleep, four seven, eight hours you wake up is better our two. You know, given our of like getting ready for work have breakfast taking a shower, then you ve got about fifteen hours. She quite literally one is entire day and he said: okay bring a dude and she said no and ashes angry about it. Campbell received the request. Robinson reportedly asked if you could see if she could, if us, if she could, she have a male colleagues, comic oven, impose get a copy editor. He asked if she gave a male colleagues accompany her,

of both attended to reach out to Robbin through the campaign, but did not receive a response. Campbell told how bout it would have been different if the campaign suggested a male staffer accompany instead They were telling her since she was a woman should provide additional resources. No it's because you, oh my god, that you know what man we have a real problem with entitlement in this generation. A kid you not people who think their own things yeah. You want to come. You. You take care of the resource. Could you imagine if some of our new interview with you and I want you to pay the bill for the restaurant and about the space and known and unknown, hear here my terms, take it or leave it. Are they going to play the fosters? I'm not super concern is Campbells with covering fosters campaign. She focus bed for the governors mansion in November and later wrote a story about him being offered a large amount of money by republican operative, not to run for governor. What is it just? A Misty orgy Opie issue, Cappel set Cappel, has has had friends and others reaching on telling her they face situations. These things feel familiar,

The conversation, this ordeal raises an important one. Campbell later explained, politics has been up until the last couple of decades, almost entirely male space. I think this is an echo of that oh, it's an echo, the me to era and men being concerned that they will be smeared maligned accused, and they don't want that to happen. mention the lean and survey a direct result of the meat to era. And they even say that on a programme on how am I gonna pull it out, but my understanding, as they say straight up that in the wake of me too many men are, are concerned about being accused or other people spreading rumors. and causing problems rolled men and women, so they're like no men, don't want a mental them anymore. I don't blame them, Could you imagine what it's like for you? No thirty, five, forty old guy with a twenty four. The old woman people exist elsewhere. To thank sorry, that's the culture, that's being fomented by the left by the feminists planet.

simple, I'm not saying they shouldn't caught bad behaviour, they should call it out, but this is the result of that and it should be obvious. and I don't have a solution. As you know, there is turn on going debate about air conditioning and in the workplace Taylor. A journalist tweeted that Esias Access than when we ve heard time and time again it originally an onion article. I could you not and she ratio, the biggest race yeah I've ever seen. That means on twitter shining, a hundred retreats, but like ten thousand replies from people telling her she's wrong on of insults, which I dont think I think, are unfair, because TAT was actually really really nice person, and so there is they when someone makes a bad faith nonsensical in a statement The thing when you have someone like Taylor, we actually is really really nice and item has tremendously respect or, even though I disagree with some of our stories in writing. She's very nice and cordial and she's deserving respect, so I will not be you know I try not to disrespect people based on their their opinions. I think our opinions wrong. That's fine! What she said was

I should be allowed to wear address in the summer Her solution is that men should be allowed to wear shorts and Palos as well sure, but That's not necessarily the issue, the argument that men are our hotter because, they wear suits is not necessarily the only issue. Men feel about ten degrees warmer period, So now what what we're facing this? Like some, so here's the plan for anaemic Why should a woman be allowed to wear a flowery son dress in summer? Why shouldn't she where the same proper tyres, everybody else. Why should the argument be that men should be addressed down, but the issue is as Jordan Peter brings up. Why do women want to appear sexually attractive in the workplace? That shouldn't be appropriate in the workplace is for its were business, and perhaps as your peers and suggest, women should wear make up and low cut, tops and dresses. They should, where businesses tire and they should be make up now is an interesting question. I think people should wear what they want to wear to feel confident and powerful, but there

something to be said about a woman who wants to wear dress in the summer. It's interesting to me it's interesting, because men have very few attire choices. You know women have a ton of different things, they can wear and they can wear suits so there. At that, because they want to wear addressing the summer there too cold, but then you have whole issue of me too. Should we get rid of air conditioners in the workplace so that women can wear dresses, or should we say what and should have to help be held to the same standard as men. Should men beheld the same standard of what, as women or women, to the same standard of man? That's the question, so perhaps the solution and saying they don't have to wear suits, but What are the issues as men don't wear suits because they forced to they. Do it because consider proper business attire and address is it right so. Ultimately, they should comes out of this. If women want to dress down and appear sex in the workplace and creating me to problem, it has like so

there's an argument. We made an and it's silly to me that a lot of the feminist on issues, a women's sought, the woman's fault if she wants to appear, succeeds like no, but if I'm not talking about a salt or harassment, I'm talking about unwanted romantic, but you know inclinations so, but by in every capacity it is wrong for a guy grass or Haldeman period. What I'm trying to virgin, specifically as if a woman wears a low cut top and she looks very sexy, unattractive, ensuring flowery dress and then a man, advances towards you get angry about it. Well you're looking attractive and that's the result you get. Should we do Man, you are not allowed to ask on dates or at you know, make advances on them are talking about, while the respite again and talk about a guy saying like you look stunning, would you like to go and you note on a date with me, I think you're beautiful PETE, now a lot of a move that inappropriate it's not fair, that when we are treated this way, but the same time, that's part of normal human direction. Anyway, I'm not gonna gaunt superpowers when I'm gonna report a ton back to back so, but here you go first of all,

What funnel fought journalist you're not entitled to anyone's time case, if that's his conditions, so be it, and secondly, this what happens in the meat to era good or bad? Whatever your opinion, this is what could be expected, expect to see more stick around more videos coming up. The next will be at Youtube COM slashed him cast a different channel, and I will see you there. our story- begins the end of February of this year when a former Trump campaign staffer sued, alleging that Trump kissed her without consent. The latest update is that a very has been released showing the video of the cap. behind the lawsuit, as it turns out, it looks like Trump did, a rather informal cheek kiss, So, let's wait a little bit of the first story. Animal breakdown, exactly what's going on in this latest uptake here, was the a from CNN, a former trumpet and pain, staffers suing Donald Trump and his campaign, alleging that the Van republican presidential candidate kissed her without our consent. During the twenty sixteen rice

She's also suing over equal pay, claiming that she was paid less for her work based on race and Gender Alva Johnson, a former trump campaigns. Africa has in Alabama alleged than a lawsuit filed Monday, that Trump grabbed her hand and forcibly kissed her without our Cosette without our consent inside an army in Florida in August twenty. Sixteen while tromp was me with volunteers, and signing autographs inside the ivy. Miss Johnson noticed the defendant. Tromp was watching her an appeal. To be trying to make eye contact with her after tromp was alerted by the by secret service that he was due for the next rally. She urged him to go in there and kick ass. Tromp then allegedly grasped her hand and praised her efforts as defendant Trump spoke. He tightened his grip on Miss Johnson's hand and the lean towards her. He moved. close enough that you could feel his breath on her skin the lawsuit states. Miss Johnson we realized, defended. Tromp was trying to kid

for on the mouth and of attempted to avoid this by turning her head to the right, defended Trump kissed her anyway, and the kiss landed on the corner of her mouth The lawsuit alleges that several witnesses sought the incident, including then for the attorney General PAM Bundy, then state director, Karen Giorno and regional directors, Earl Tony Ledbetter, Mitch, Tyner and Nickel Vienna For you know the lawsuit alleges that body smiled when the incident occurred and Giorno Grab Missis thousands elbow and gave it and approving tug after the incident on her way to the campaign state headquarters and Sarah sort of Florida It claims that Johnson called her partner and then her parents to tell them what had happened crying ass. She recalled the incident is all really important context.

because when you hear this story, it sounds like you have this lecherous, you know. Actually airlines been some sort of family guy, you ve ever what you I'm sure. Many of us, you never family guy, where Peter has to go to a practiced gate. Forgive me for the crude reference, but it makes sense to me Peter goes and it's a routine exam when you know goes, the colors are normal and he has to get a prostate exam later on when he remembers how it happened. say, horror scene where it's all black and white, the doctors, evil and laughing at ha ha putting on a glove and because it oh, and this is what it sounds like. We have video of the event the way she describes it. It sounds like you know. Trop is looking at it and any grabs. Orange is like no stop anti cancer. When reality he walked with its high bank. You guess her cousin the chickens moves on now. This video has come out and they're trying to claim it's actually proof.

for claims. I gotta say we are now going to enter this realm of one screen to movies. I assure you. The anti trump crowded Gonna are gonna claim a hot. He kissed russian and done it. But to me it looked like a european style. You know like isn't it that people will meet and they turn their heads they cast aside. So the latest uptake from media this morning, Trump lawyer, release, video of caste behind lawsuit filed by former campaigns, staffer Alva Johnson. Now I will One point: one of the criticisms is that in the video which are out of play right now, ok, it's not working. I think I might have the actual tweet here. Yes, so here's the actual actual video for those that are there? in the park ass you're not going to be able to see bomber play it now. Ok, it's not playing whenever any to play it. That's what it gives me the business but are relocating, and here we go.

And there it is so so let me start this over and I'm gonna give you could play biplane trumpet walking. He sees her. He looks to his right. And then you can see when he moved his head in his head is turned to the left and he gives are a key kiss, not us out of her mouth look little. But the image or seeing, first of all, one of the points made is that she was the right to saying she was happy. She said I was. I was doing this for you and she's, not at all of set that gives her this european style side history cheek ass right what yours right. Now the screen of laws that are focusing on the podcast trump his lips do not appear to be making any contact with her face at all. It looks like the bottom of his chin is on her right cheek and his lips are in the air like a european style to the side. It's not a real kiss. and that's it and then, but he doesn't was hands on her shoulders and she says eight mb.

As for you, and then he makes a man's, he shot it's her hand, pats on the shoulder and he walks away, and that's it from the original story. It was made and like tromp, was assaulting women on the campaign trail in twenty sixteen, but now it the video- and I think any reasonable person has to look at this and say what is happening in this country. Of course, they are using. That is evidence. So in the story, three, they say. Lawyers and President Donald Trump released. Video of what appears to be a very innocent cast between Trump and a campaign staffer Alan Johnson, who is suing the present for an alleged non consensual, kiss that took during her work between sixteen campaign in February lawsuit filed in Florida. Forty three Johnson's had trumpet grabbed her hand and kissed her on the lips, as we can see from the video that did not happen. That's a lie.

They say that jobs and told the Washington post. He had leaned and forecast when she accidentally turned her head and the kiss landed on the side of her mouth, which was super creepy at an appropriate again, we look to the video trumps head is turned to aft and hurried to the right, and it looks at his chin is on her chin. I just it's not there. We ve seen the video and he kisses into the air. I immediately felt violated because I wasn't expecting it or wanting it. She told the post. I can still see his lips coming straight from my face in a court filing Lord lawyer, Charles harder rights, the video shows that plaintiffs allegations in the complaint that Mr Trump forcibly kissed her and kissed her on the mouth are entirely false. He calls the suit on meritorious and frivolous the kid revealed in the video appears to be an innocent, and rather pedestrian pack on the cheek greeting in what appears to be a crowded room where Trump and Johnson are surrounded by others. The video was captured by campaign volunteer Bright Hayes.

Claimed in legal filings that he was present in the hour of it at the time of the interaction and recorded the video is phone Johnson. has claimed that she was on the receiving end of an unwanted and forcible kiss from Trump during an interview with Amazon His crochet specifically described, lodged advance now, but we ve seen the video, let's see how she frames it. I wasn't close to him and I was wearing the baseball cap, but he had to pass me on on his way exiting the ivy ass he passed. I said you go and do a good job. You kick ass because I've been away from my family for a long time and he stopped and he grabbed my my my hand, I'm assuming and he starts looking at me. He said and I'm doing on going to do a good job. I'm not going to let you down. I know you ve been away from your family and he's holding my hand holding my hand, and then he said coming towards me, and so he still holding my hand- and I just had a lot of internal dialogue like? Is he going to hug me and then he keeps coming closer and, unlike ok, is he going to hug

and then I'm like? Oh, my god, I think he's gonna kill me was coming directly for my face. I mean this is with the the bill of my baseball, And when I realized is going to kiss my lips, I turned my mouth. He caught me right on the corner of my mouth and I was just kind of frozen. I didn't not a process it. I knew it was inappropriate because I worked in human resources, so I knew it was completely appropriate it was grossing. Creepy, like I can sometimes still see those lips, and so he walked out now, let's go over, She says she was holding her hand in the video he's holding your hand. Look at this. He walks his hands on his side. Both of his hands go up immediately and then we can His hands go on her shoulder. I dont believe tribes, his hands on his shoulder and he turns, has had to dodge the Brim, and he goes for her cheek.

It is absurd to me the wages framing at first he's, not holding her hand. He didn't say anything to her. What that take a look here. She says that he he said to her I'm not I'm going to do a good job, and I can't let you down. I know you ve been away from her family. That's a lot to say in the split second any says: nothing he's! It's always saying. Thank you. Thank you appreciate and set the way, she's framing it claiming what he said to her. It's just seemingly not true. However, there's other responded, Johnson attorney Hassan Z, every season did in a positive light for Johnson according to reporting by politico. He said we are gratified and pleased that we finally have proof of what Miss Johnson has been alleging in this lawsuit is based, is basically exactly what Miss Johnson has been saying. It's not the interaction threat presented in the video embedded above, which includes a second caught slowed down to twenty five. percent speed, also released by the Trouble Eagle team is the same

interaction Johnson described above. It is difficult to imagine this case, proceeding with merit. Media eight is saying this. What Trump did is a standard greeting. We in the? U s rarely, but in Europe a lot grabbing the shoulders and turned to the side and giving a kiss if you're good at present that to a judge or jury and claim is an inappropriate actions are gonna, be confused and you can make the argument we shouldn't be doing these these informal greetings anymore or formal readings, whatever you want to call it sure in August, side has changed, and men and women can no longer do folk kisses to the side. But if that's the case, then this is innocent and from open and moving we will no longer do this but how insane as it, I really wonder, a woman who was willing to spend eight months on the campaign. Trail away from a family in support of Trump would turn her back in this way and smear him like this, but I'll and with this don't be surprised when the laughter saying we have video of him kissing this woman, it's proof shore,

context matters, but not of these people stick around. I got two more autumn restores coming for you in a few minutes, and I will see you surely it's possible, as your watch this video, I'm still the white ass. I have no idea, I don't know when the event is supposed to start That's not what I'm supposed to be there and we're going to be. Talking about big tack, fake news, media smears. I honestly have no idea the president tweeted this morning and it is what is so. It is possible I'm out by now, but I saw the story today from Buzzfeed NEWS and I gotta admit I'm just so. Damn confused one of the big issues I have as an individual who was left leaning believes in Dublin regulation. I can go through my might my list of my political questions all day and night. One of the problems I have as unaccountable corporations I've always been concerned. Of unaccountable corporations, as has the left. Why, today, when conservatives challenge big tech oligopoly are the left rush into their defence to smear all of these people, including me as extremists,

makes no sense. Take a look at the story of Busby NEWS. These texts, companies are giving millions to politicians who vote against algae beating you people a group of thirty advocates, sent a letter Wednesday to dozens of companies, including Amazon and Google, calling unnoticed giving money to politicians who discriminate. Ok, I dont disagree with that activist action. If you find their high profile people were making donations and ways you dont like petition them. I agree why Is it that when I challenge the tech companies on their egregious violations of sin Libraries are the encroachment in the public sector the taking over the commons. The left smears me and insult me and then turns around and then tries to smear and target Google. These big corporations- and they got among these big tat giants, ok other unaccountable and they can use that power to sway politics. That's distance, I dont think Facebook, Google, twitter or otherwise should have the right to determine what our politics are going to be there

should be some kind of limit. Now I addressed the back of a day. The media companies essentially decided. This is well by choosing what to put on tv and what not to but there were some some rules about how much time they had to give to politicians. We are now seeing overt political bias. I must it's a conspiracy, I'm saying it's in our faces. There was a account congressional hearing where I believe it was with twitter where someone asked. Why is it that in DC, when you sign up for deep for twitter, it only right this democratic politicians that is that not an inclined donation to those politicians- maybe maybe not the point, is I dont want twitter to determine. Who should be President apparently either does Buzzfeed and its accuracy organization war concerned that many of these people are turning to anti algae, bbq people, So why are we fighting? Why is that when I say Facebook should not be the arbiter of truth, they smear me and they lie about me. Well I'll, tell you what all that's really been happening in the culture war is the empowerment of the elites, the coup.

corrections in the status quo to shut down independent voices occupy Wall Street. I feel like a big wake up call you had left, right wing libertarian they are those first few days. I could you not and they all agreed, the one percent was the problem raised. Creed, color, etc. National origin section. Under that mattered, what mattered was banksters and corporations in revolt, revolving door policies led to the collapse of the economy in the these states and around the world and negatively impact the work impact of the working class. But something started to happen that immediately disrupted calls for class justice racial. I. to terrorism starting to emerge and peoples are claiming you're a racist or big it if you didn't benevieni shorn off slowly but surely Within a few days the older republican types were gone and when the first week it was too much of college students pushing racial added, a terrorism, and this is this. I think this is a big problem. I think so

they probably face it is like an anti terrorism, splits the left, but look at this way when you look at a wealthy multimillionaire billionaire, even who happens to be black? Will back in the you could say I dont care of your white black Asian, whatever, if you're one of these extra who crashed the economy. With your with your? U no ill thought out policies, then he we need some accountability, but the narrative changed after Occupy Wall Street instead of challenge in the one percent, what are we doing now blaming people based on arbitrary skin color so hears it happens, you under was serene a Williams guy, I'm gonna be a deck, but she is one of the most powerful individuals in the world period period. There are very few people have more power than she does very few

Maybe in the thousands she is a multi millionaire, extremely famous, strong and talented individual, but she's complaining about marginalized groups and depression. How does that make sense? How did we come to a point now where the argument has flipped from challenge the big? operation swore suppressing. You know individuals and shutting down the poor to see that White almost guy over there. He s privilege. How do we get to a point where you could actually argue that a homeless sky, laying in his own waste and San Francisco is somehow more privileged and someone like Serena Williams. How do we get to the point where the a sea l. You is actually defending overt racism at Harvard

where that the school actually says? If you look a certain way, they will make it harder for you to get in the left used to be about class, but something happened, and now we have a corporate elite, big business tech, oligopoly, Mark Zuckerberg, soggy brands and epitaphs enterprise, even Jack Dorsey, to an extent, although I think, is kind of a figurehead super wealthy tech elites, pointing the finger at poor white people saying there the problem. What do we see in DC for the free speech rally a bunch of american set citizens of limited power and authority, some more powerful than others speaking out against massive corporations and what happened anti FA is convinced. Their enemy is not the elites, this the millionaires, those who control the bank's those who run these big massive companies, their convinced. If the Americans there being told the problem, isn't the rich people, the problem? Isn't the elites or unaccountable

It's your fellow working class and lower class individuals and their. We see aunt of anti FA becomes a tool for Facebook and Google and massive international tax oligopoly. These anti for activists show up and threaten and intimidate those who would challenge the big corporations take a look at the smears that are coming out right now against me and everyone else? Why are they defending Facebook? It makes no sense If we're gonna have a summit and talk about these issues, isn't it a good thing that we challenge Facebook? Aren't? You on the left upset that Facebook empowered trumped win with Cambridge Analytical and an axe and giving up private data. They shouldn't have shouldn't you be in it, Raymond, whatever your political ideology, as we should challenge unaccountable massive corporations. Now these people have been convinced, it's not the unaccountable billionaire elites. It's not

the myth, multi millionaire politicians who, for some reason on a salary of a hundred seventy four thousand dollars, are not worth hundreds of millions of us. It's not them. It's not it's that poor white guy who doesn't know wise factory was shut down, so we voted for Trump it's that middle aged woman, whose wearing a trumpet there the enemy, Its long been said on the left that the rich people will point to the poor and blame immigrants or other poor people to convince you. It's not. Why then does anti for show up and threaten poor american citizens? Andrew Yang brings up good and interesting points and, of course he gets smeared fort. He says that he's campaigning to address all of the issues that gonna got Donald Trump elected, one of which is automatic and people were losing their jobs. I've tremendous respect for that he's not you know, has been cut watch out for sure Buddy saying listen, you know people lost their jobs and middle men I didn't know why and tromp came into when you're jobs back Andrew Yang saying we need a more forward thinking solution because of this,

They smear Yang and Gabert as the alt right Democrats, I'm not exist during they literally. They call them this. So when I come out and say, those people. I support as a left wing individual there's a go figure supporting the all right Democrats, its absurd Chelsea, Gabert, Anti WAR, outright Democrat VOX called her position. War conservative. So here we are. This is the current state of our politics. It's very convenient for the status quo, elites, What do you call it? The ivory tower billionaires those who control industry is in any Wonder we're seeing the Coke Brothers and George Soros agree on censorship of of hate speech on social media no they're, both ITALY and in agreement make the poor people fight each other.

Get the middle class of people of color to point the finger at the poor white people and blame them for their ills, and then none of the problems actually get solved. These big companies with unaccountable billionaires, running media, running tech, telling you what to think and feel it's no one, they are supporting policy that exacerbates the culture, war and Rachel. Protectionism. It suits their needs, but I think it might actually A rapid destabilization to make things worse on that same is a grand conspiracy. Ahmad thing is intentional: I'm saying that's what's happening whether or not someone to happen. What we are seeing now is left wing activists blaming the working class. There was a protest in Seattle and Amazon Building A bunch of young socialists came out saying that Amazon wasn't paying their workers fairly. So a bunch of you will labourers came out, yelling trump shouting them down. These people left claim to represent the working class. They d.

the working class are middle aged. You know, dude, who voted for Trump, who want their jobs back, who want to work in a factory who wore union guys and what happens? How did drunk a trump break? The blue wall right, miss again, Wisconsin Pennsylvania, Ohio economic Sector, which states tromp wasn't supposed to in their Hillary Clinton thought she would win, but she was it. She was a politician for the elites and Trump one because of it, and now we can see the conversation. It's gonna make things worse: the working class people, those who are challenged, challenging bitch big corporations, probably gonna vote for trunk. So anyway to wrap this up causes in issuing a correct on for a long time, but I want to make sure I don't miss the point here. Buzzfeed is writing my activists challenging Google will good for them challenge. Google should not be using their unaccountable power to suppress the speech of individuals or oppose algae. Beating you rights,

Why, then, would you smear me when I agree with you and think tech oligopoly should be stopped from controlling public discourse and influencing our elections, I dont think people think it through. I dont think they're doing on purpose. I think they have just been convinced. This is the right thing to do: defend the Big corporation Well, congratulations. You have become stooges and foot soldiers for massive, unaccountable multi, national billion dollar corporations. I don't care about you and will suppress you The white settlements, notice, Google told their employees they weren't allowed to protest. Now you ve got Google's. Amazon staff donating to anti algae ridicule groups. Why is this not surprising to me and when will they wake up? Perhaps they won't? Stick around. I got one more silent coming up for you in a few minutes. I will see you. Then I've got a lot of criticism for constantly talking about it, how's your quarters and trying to act like anything. She does is making a mountain out of a molehill. Here's the thing she has like: four million followers, she's very inflow.

And she's representation of the identity areas left in the Democrats. I dont like Nancy Pelosi all that much because I think he's an elite, multi millionaire who doesn't really represent american interests and I'm curious how somebody on a salary of a hundred. Seventy four thousand miles ear is now worth you know what hundred million dollars plus I am not going to discuss the disparities are simply because she's wealthy, but it's kind of weird. Isn't it we then get Abkhazia Cortez, who look at first, I praised and actually I agree with some of our positions, I made a video strictly praising her when she, such as in a team up with tat crews to end the lobbying pipeline spot. On sounds great. I praised her for calling for the end of private presence and agree with their one hundred percent illegal immigrants in this country are still protected under the fourth amendment and have constitutional rights. To fact it's true, but she says nonsense things. She she is the wife advocate for environmental them. She makes all look bad look at the story but wire. Ok,

you're Cortez suggests policy is targeting her because policy is racist. Now, that's it! That's that their informing that from some cause you Cortez says I think it's a fair point to be made it because a car TAT makes the claim that policy is targeting her and singling out women of color. Specifically, I do not believe that Nancy Policy is targeting Abkhazia Cortez because of grace she's doing it, because Abkhazia Cortez is ignorant bombastic divisive at all also dangerous or cause your Cortez repeatedly escalates her rhetoric and is encouraging division in this country's very dangerous. It's also divisive, for that I'm a crass who want to win so analogy below. He says we need to be united, we're family, dont, tweet or cause your predecessor boss, basically you're a big it lets route the story It's really a bit about the story, and then we will carry on with the point of making from the daily. Why are they say? Socialist Rep, Alexandria, Abkhazia Cortez attacked how Speaker Nancy policy during multiple? isn't interviews dongle.

far as to say that she believes that policy is targeting her because polo He is racist. I think sometimes people think that we have a relationship of Cosmic Cortez has told the New Yorker radio. Our not part, Similarly, the last time I kind of spoke to her one one was when she asked me to join that joining the select committee on climate change I was assigned to some of the busiest committees and for subcommittees, so my hands are full and sometimes I wonder if they're trying to keep me busy. Abkhazia Cortez suggested to the Washington Post on Wednesday, a policy was racist, saying when these comments, first started. I kind of thought she was keeping the progressive flank at more of an arms distance in order to protect protect, more moderate members, which I understand but the persistent singling out it got to a point where it was just outright disrespectful. the explicit singling out of newly elected women of color.

And there we can see the other shoe drop Abkhazia, but has actually implying Nancy Policy is racist for calling her It is absurd to me that we have we had these arguments. The left claims if you criticise anybody, you're a racist and the Democrats and Republicans it is too with Israel, you can actually criticise Israel having an anti semite, there's an important distinction in what you're criticising so, yes, Nancy, pull so. You can tell a casual has, was four million followers and tweets ridiculously bombastic things and routinely generates bad press like this to chill out? It is not because of her race. Okay, sport has, in my opinion, uses this as a cudgel. It's her way of saying I'm going to strike at policy knocker down with more progressive by choosing of racism, because it's it's look. It's a victim of the Olympics. Of course, of cosmic has never done anything wrong. She says

and these were the worst things about all the things I think is so dangerous, o cause. You Cortez refuses to ever acknowledge her false. She is a dangerous egotist who purposefully makes divisive tweets to piss people off to gain followers to pass. The buck and when she called out for say her an identical things when you do she double down or provides an excuse for once in your life, oh cause, you Cortez admit that you were right. on a myth? Is that this is not what is coming after you, court has said concentration camps and mark a major national news story. It resulted in all the costs museum speaking up denouncing a holocaust survivors. That is not the kind of press. The Democrats need if they're going to be Trump and the Republicans in the next year and following but cause you doesn't care she's bombastic eagerly.

Go narcissistic? She said as much. She has tweets where she says things like I'm, the boss, I'm in charge, you are just yelling from the cheap seats. She is disruptive and destructive to the Democrats, and thus Nancy Policy criticizes her. So what is cosmic return. Do she pulls the card straight out of the regressive identity and left playbook? You must be a racist, that's the only reason you really criticise made plain and simple freedom. Policy has repeatedly mocked Abkhazia, quotas and the other three far left Freshmen House Democrats recently telling the New York Times all these people have their public whatever and their twitter world, but they didn't have any following there for people and that's how many votes they got and that's a cold wake up call from Nancy Pelosi. Twitter is not real life. I'd be willing to bet a lot of people on the left. Yet, even so, even some modern Democrats follow,

Oh, no, my colleague! What has it I'll tell you this as an escape park recently and while we were arguing some progressive issues, some people were further left than I wasn't somewhere further right. We all agreed o conflict has gonna jump the shark. I was thinking about this the other day with all the smear pieces, coming out, I want to say something to. I grew up: skateboarding skateboards, hey cups, they have the eyes of a short, a half. That's an arrest me, I'm escape border, making the point that cops, often you know, would arrest, detain and fine. Skateboard escape orders cops Duncan along now I get it state borders want to do tricks that resulted that that can result in gradual property damage, and so the cops have to remove you, but but their state borders are anti establishment. They dont, they don't like cops their urban. They tend to be urban.

left, leaning, something interesting happens, I'm getting hit by Proske eight borders, sending messages cheering beyond from rock stars join me, and I have a poster at my house, autographed by a very famous rockstar cheers me on I'm thinking about this. When you get state borders, nor my son silly, but would seriously when skate. What disagree with you, you ve done something wrong left. Ok, the state borders used to be the left. They were progressive, hippy and Arco. Punk and now I've got protein imports hitting nothing like what's happening. Why did you but one crazy? You do good work come out escaped with us. I've been invited to different cities and and and countries, and it's crazy for me to see some of my Tell the heroes reaching out saying: I love what you do. Men and I'm like it's crazy. Remember big fourteen watching that video, but these are people who used to oppose the system who were on the left now sang the left has gone knots, and here we are a cause. Your quarters is an example of how they ve gone. Knots, skate porters at the port.

Saying my face. What is wrong with her Nancy plus he trying to real her in, and what did she do? You must be racist. Twitter is not real. Life Nancy she is correct. They have a large number of twitter followers. What's important is that we have a large number of votes. On the above a floor of the house. Pelosi said in April. She said: while there are people of a large number of twitter followers she's right on Twitter, you have a fake that no one cares about, and surely this trickles into the mainstream median fake news, but I think about this. All of these airs come out about mean that in the social media summit lying about me Miss frame What I'm saying and try to make me look bad and I think, at the end of the day, you know what, when regular people out on the street of Escape park wrought in at clubs and bars disagree with these fringe wackos on Twitter. I think we're doing good. I think we're doing all right. Unfortunately, this results in a lot of people, not believing there really conservative when there actually liberals,

The problem is what called liberal today is representative of these weird twitter, mobs and people go Cassio Cortez, it's not so they'll. Try to call me right. Wing because they want to change that they want to shift the Overton Window. I have to be right wing. So that way, any one to the right of me is far right, but that's absurd. Sixty three million people, this country voted for Donald Trump and I would not even be right wing enough to we'll do that and a lot of people say when will to. Finally, I am not going to vote for the guy. I'm pro choice is a very important position for me. I am anti death penalty anti war I want to. I think private presence should be ended, but I believe in liberty and free speech- and there is no political home for me. So there you have it. I don't know how we got into a political rent again young historian yo see, but there it is, they say policy also marked or cause an interview with CBS Sixty minutes in April, while dismissing the far left wing of the party

So you know I I want to make sure I wanna keep us one short. I love how there are some media critics claiming that some people, like me, tries hard. candidate to ten minutes, but I hope you will realize all. Of I videos are a desperate attempt to stop talking. It's really fun, when there was one tweet about a video I made and some leftwing persons at how could Temple talk about himself for half an hour and on what Oh man, that's me restraining myself. Ok, I got too much going on and solemn, I'm gonna try and stop this around ten minutes, because I have to get to the White House, but you know the last thing I mention policy

has that they show several examples of policy slamming o cause or tat. I M not going to read through all of em again I'm keeping one short, and I think as much as I have a disdain for these corporate millionaire Democrats. There is there. You know there is something to be said for what Nancy Policy as it is, is, is doing in regards to oversee. But, lastly, what do I see? Multi millionaire elite, corporatist Democrats and far left France to detain weeder weirdos and who do I vote for it. Republican, whose pro choice. Now that's not what I'm sorry that brought the pro life and a lot of other issues, economic issues. You know, that's not really where I met politically, so I vote for no one, that's the truth. Nobody will see what happens. I liked wholesale again I will see what happens next rang out, stick around more videos to come.

But I should have an update after the summit. I don't know lenses filmed way early by the way like I found everything super quick and it's actually pretty hard for me to do, but I've been working really hard. I will see you all tomorrow. At ten, thirty am arms. I ten a m on this gentle unless, of course, some big news happens at the summit. Thanks rang out, I will see you next time.