The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man. Only reads the news: we have a story here: Thou jumped Junior just got booed off the stage by his own supporters, really his own supporters. First of all, I question whether others their supporters of his, if their booing him but a store, is actually really really complicated and vice the Washington Post, the hill actually like they'll, be disappointed. They have no interest in doing the leg work to help you understand what actually is happening. Why was Donald Trump Junior actually bode? Well, they are relevant. Many gritty. They want to paint a picture in your head that trumps supporters are turning on him at their Boeing. Is bad news for Trump? That's not at all, what's happening in their quest for clicks there miss framing stories. They are misleading you. They want you to click and its literally may Democrats go insane. I am not exaggerating. I talked about this earlier today, at least in my opinion. We know that

one to a new Paul released by axioms Democrats are being angered by literally everything, and the reason for it is that the news as well to you. I've got several into something to show you where there are lying lying line, but the big store that I really want to break down is what happened with trumped junior and why was he being booed? It's actually cut a nuanced. There there's a group of far right and white nationalist individuals who are upset that, even though conservatives so they say therefore free speech, they ve been shutting down. Curative could q and a events they ve been barring. Some of these people from coming to this event sought so their angry, and so there booing Trump Junior for not taking questions. It's actually a bit complicated. They say they support Junior, but I have to question that to the challenges for someone like trumped Junior, whose overtly saint he says the fact I dont want to give these people a platform because they're looking for

and bite, and many conservatives question whether or not these America first and white nationalist types actually support the present, because all they're doing is generating negative press. You see it's complicated excites a miracle. Doubt that you ve got one side saying we don't want you here, other side saying: stick to your principles. How dare you you know not allow free speech and that's a complicated battle. Vice is not interested in telling you the actual controversy. They just want to paint a picture that trumped junior. Supporters are turning on him, so I got a couple stores on the show you and then surprise. This is really crazy to me. It's the daily mail that actually breaks down better in their headline. Why is this happening while the Washington Post and which had some of the original reporting on this, does get into the more extreme go beliefs of these hecklers, the headline they ve been that the headline, which is mostly what people really don't read into the story. It's misleading.

So people are reading these stories and there being told to different things, the same time and its making people in saying so there's a kind of building an offshoot of, video did earlier this morning with this is the crux of sorts: let's read this and try and figure out what happened with trumped junior before we get started and over its and cast outcome slashed on it. If you'd like to support my work, there are several ways you can help me out. The best thing you can do is just this video, because what I'm trying to do is take these mainstream stories of no context that don't inform you which actually happening and help shine a light on reality. Botsey this man, it's getting impossible. It really is Try my best every day to to read the news and fact jackets. I saw this story about trunk being booed by his own supported us I'd. Let me look into this and figure out why his own supports me that it is in reality it wasn't his supporters, its people who, like truck to an extent they tacitly like trucks, the best they have, but they don't like trumped so they boat.

Isn't it it's actually quite complicated and when I realized this and so all of these stories, I was kind of surprised. Here's the big point when the left demands that white nationalists and foreign division, binkie platforms, not that the media as well there. It is the principal left calling out the you know the far right when Trump Junior does it, they make fun of them. They Markham a little and then make it seem of his own supporters are turning on the meat is simultaneously reporting to different things and there's the double standard. Now now we're trying to tell you is this morning when I saw that political report that contradicted I'm thinking myself. How can I know? How can I fact check? I need If the same outlet claims its own reporting is false, we're going to appoint now wurtz its it seriously mind breaking even for me, I'm a journalist

read this? I try to know the facts, but it is mind breaking when I read stories. The New York Times says Jack was so big lied when he claimed that and men was consulting ukrainians. Then never report, saying windmills, salted Ukrainians and unlike what where's You had a total oversight. What's real anymore, perhaps on purpose Perhaps they want to make sure that anybody who trusts the news is losing their mind, or perhaps they just want sure. Nobody trusts the media anymore because be real. The media is, the journalism is an important factor in protecting democracy, and it has been completely a road. By these companies. Looking at a b c news did thanks to project verities. We know they spiked one of them.

The stories of our generation Epstein. They said no shut it down. We know they're, not in it to tell the truth, and so now there pointing out these stories. Here's what I really think I didn't put these stories out because it gets clicks. They want you to view. Tromp is being booed by his own supporters is not the case because you'll click it and they don't care if your informed or not, they just want click, so they will lie to you. Let's see what vice says. Donald Trump Junior abandoned the stage in a book signing the use, yellow campus Sunday after being ruthlessly heckled dot dot dot by his own supporters. The problem apparently big after the president, son and his girlfriend said they wouldn't be in a q and a session at the event to promote donging as new book triggered by the left, thrives on hate and wants to silence us as trumpet the stage chance of USA morphed into Q and a and the crowd restless. The event was scheduled to last two hours, both in about twenty minutes trump and is girlfriend left the stage of the garden reported

While there were some liberal protests that you see last Sunday, the disruption at the book event was apparently sparked by disagreements among conservative truck fence, not true the guardian reported. The angry jeers began among far right activists, some of whom were big fans of equipment as the twenty one year old House of a pod cast called America first and that's where they stop with Nick Winters. They don't want to talk about his more extreme positions and white nationalist talking points out to be careful about who accused of what, because I'm not trying to get into a political fight on trying to point out that people like Donald Trump Junior ART, are trying to avoid conversations with people there, you are acting are being disingenuous, celebs jump over to where the story a rigid needed, because vice is an interested and giving it the full context. The Washington Post, they say, Donald Trump Junior went to use your lay to decry triggered liberals. He was heckled off stage by the far right. They gonna talk about what we already know this. As the as first reported by the guardian. A number

conservative summit, you and I say she had been cancelled. Video from the event showed a chant started out as USA, USA turning quickly into angry cries of Q, Andy Q and eight minutes later trunk junior and give full sorry from plus you name wrong storm the stage you can see that I highlighted went as specifically to see if the Washington Post would be looking into him. An inch and talking about who he is and what he believes and what started this controversy. They say the Catholic seen Conner did trumps juniors central feasts thesis that liberals have grown so intolerant of dissenting voices. Conservative politicians can no longer engage in civil discourse. It also expose and increasingly hostile fisher between cast.

Of certain groups like turning point USA and a hard right faction of young Trump Dvds who have flocked to self professed american Nationalist, Nick Flint, as and as America. First movement, This really complicated, and I can't tell you that a simple solution, its fairness- that there are standard conservatives who are angry, that trumped Junior would shut down acumen Evan because, while people may detest, Nick went as his views the idea that he has a right to ask questions and you would shut on a culinary or bar him from entry is antithetical to the idea of free speech. In which case you ask, conservatives will actually absolutely be angry and also that there's another factor here, adventure Piero doing an event where he basically called out many people of the alternate but conflated them with. What's called the new right, so their absently is a fisher here and it's, I think it's unfair other trying to paint this as though trumped juniors being tackled by his own supporters. Women

energy is a is a Fisher between Donald Trump, Junior and the people. He does not want to be a lot of platform, so here's ears the complicated part, as I mentioned earlier, when you look at what the left does and what they cheer for, you would think these media outlets would be celebrating Donald Trump Juniors, Donald Trump seniors decision to agree with them. Instead, there are not pointing out that the figure is caused by trumped Junior actually saying I dont want to prove A platform to these people who hold white nationalist views there, making it seem like trumps base, is just fractured and falling apart again to an extent that does make some sense. We have to understand that the White Nationalist more forward we are a minority of minority of a minority. Many people have conflated likes argon, for instance, talks about how a saga of the cod, the British Youtube or the alt right,

Social justice left have very similar views on authoritarianism, free and unrestricted of speech, and there and and they're trying to use free speech against Trump Junior and conservatives to be allowed to espouse some of their questions but set, but look our operators, women, I believe in free speech about opinions, so I dont think you should. If someone's gonna ask a question, you don't want to hear you gotta do it. You have to get to be principled, even a third and ask you things that you don't want to answer to answer the question. If you believe in what you say, the problem, however, for trunk junior, then what you're, not gonna, get from his son from stories is that they're trying to get sound bites the press and that's why you worried about you see how their framing this you know exactly what's gonna happen, they're gonna take a culinary from one from a white nationalist and ask the question

and then they're going to say Donald Trump supporters at events, sad acts, so Trump yours has on not having any of it. People like Charlie Carcass- and you are not welcome here. We don't want to give your platform and look is a big difference between twitter, which is a monopolistic platform that people there's no one else to go and a private room of a couple hundred people. In my opinion, if somebody put on a private event that you can't come in well, that's too bad. Twitter, however, is a monopoly on what It is there's nothing else that you can use like twitter to engage in his conversations. If you want to gauge the President, that's where you gotta go, that's a different story, so I understand regulation of this complicated, but there is a big difference between saying people should be allowed on social media platforms, and you can't come to my event, but here's the thing, the Washington Post down the line of actually to the point where they say the host of an ultra conservative podcast and you took show called America first. Flanders has appeared on Youtube with bloggers who advocate for a white ethnic state.

He has used slurs and promoted Anti Semitism is broadcast which has put em at odds with daily wire. Editor bench appear out: Flint has marched in Charlottesville with white supremacist during the deadly unite the right rally, the Boston Globe reported, again. I gotta be careful to another media love to smear anybody whose to the right of of I'm not gonna make the job. But these days they frequently smear anybody who pushes back on them, but the fact is shouldn't they be celebrating. Should they be agreeing with this and shouldn't they be putting that front in centre that white nationalists are heckling, Donald Trump Junior? No, because what would that headline say to the left? White nationalists? Don't like Trump Junior dont, like Charlie Cark, don't like venture Piero

now. Many give you some more context. The important bets bench appear oak inflated, the new right people, who also don't like white nationalists with the white Nationalists and that's cause a lot of trump supporters to become angry at the daily wire. So there is a risk that is, but it's not it's not the far right verses. You know bench appear trumped junior, it is people who are angry there being smeared, because everyone's getting into this all tell you what man the media's insanity it hurts concern, we have two, because now you ve got people confused the what's really happening. You ve got bench appear and was a conservative who's who made the mistake of conflicting people who don't like white? action was with them same as the media has done for a long time when they say we want on the right is all right. We'll bench appear, o sang the new right. Isn't right was smearing standard, all middle, the road like conservatives

because they're trying to differentiate themselves from the old school publicans without a backbone, whether you like it or not. Here's one hears here's my goal here. Ok with everything I do, it's not to be smirched the integrity of any individual. Its Just explain to you why this is happening, and all I see every day is just fake news: here I would I want to highlight some examples. You know a man because I was thinking of making them. The world was just like. Did I give up seriously times accuses Jack the so that of pushing a falsehood, but he said did the New York Times. They then claim they did not report what they clearly did. Report article Jack cited even says they typically communicated in English and reference development clears effing day. Journalism is dead. Here's the first story that that the live in your time they say Jack, but so that a well known figure on the far right internet tweeted. That fought the falsehood that Mr Van men had been advising the Ukrainian

and on how to counter MR trumps foreign policy goals. Mr Coelho excited the New York Times at source. In fact, the times reported no such thing and hears I am reporting such thing. They say colonel Many concerns were shared by a number of other officials, some of whom had already testified. He was in a unique position because he emigrated from Ukraine along with his family, when he was a child and its fluent in Ukraine and in russian ukrainian officials sought advice from him. How to deal with. Mr Giuliani, though they typically communicated in English Giuliani, was of essentially running back channel for Trump to push certain foreign policy goals. Tromp had was a Pacific was saying this is this. Is then interfering in foreign policy? The New York Times playing a semantic gain then says we never reported that. How do you have to do so? Here is the ultimate problem. The media will pull out. What

however, they can to generate traffic. When there's no story, let me give you a better example about went to understand, what's happening and media with the rise of the internet, you no longer needed sections. The newspaper, the metro, you had sports entertainment. Will those individual sections now become their own websites? Many companies were fracturing these out and making a site dedicated to this dedicated to that, because most people weren't going to go to a website. You actually want Let me give you a understanding of news on you too, for instance channels that do really well do one thing: if every day you make of it where you say I don't know, he's a hydraulic press to crush something. People know that get the same thing every day and they click the video every day. But what if you do news, if you do news, Somebody who likes hydraulic press subscribes to Morrow. We do flaming hot nickel ball on other channel on Youtube and they don't like that. So they don't click you to Bandy ranks. You saying your content isn't attracting

your ship, so the news companies are separating out their content. Ultimately, what under the patenting was gaming is the perfect example If a video game comes out, you can write a review on it right. What do you write? or a video games only cannot every so often. So, in order for these writers to keep making stories that define controversies, anger generates the most traffic. This gave rise to political gaming. If I write about world of Warcraft you, you are right about the game. I've taught What's happening, what also going to click on shore, there may be some events coming up. So there's little stories here and there like stated, you know all the work that announcement new epoch event for for the new patch, so you can write about that. But what about the daily? What about the five articles per day? You have the right journalists on an elder airports then started searching desperately for any angle. To make more articles cause they needed to generate traffic to make money, then

getting political, because, as always something political and that's when we fell down the rabbit who, as a society, the New York Times wrote to stories, one in which they claimed a ukrainian official. Was seeking advice and they were communicating with them because they were concerned about trumps goals. They then wrote another story about right wing conspiracies to make more than your times is mostly funneled. Fuel pay is mostly generally revenue through subscriptions, but then he'd content, many to get you looked, so the next for their right is now they're claiming conspiracies conspiracy sourced from you dude. This is the craziest world we're living in, so I dont know how much longer I can actually do this this morning when I saw the story from politico I was thinking like but for appointing the news, I'm supposed to be doing

You know I have people at Youtube. I talked to regularly were to be having a conversation will see what happens I was thinking to myself. This is it there. You know. I've facetiously said journalism is dead for a long time, but I gotta tell you men, one political story from the other day they say that Giuliani, believe or from two years ago literally says that ukrainian officials were working directly. Dnc consult with India to consultant to funnel negative information and and at what in depth. So, yes evidence exists. The people you are come Mining about who you're conquered spears. There's our citing you were. So what do we do? Where do we go from here? I don't know,

I'm trying to break down and understand why Donald Trump Juniors being booed, but I think it a certain point. You just have to ignore the news: it's just not real anymore. It is. It is broken down to appoint one absolutely shocked. You know, I think it was run nonsense was talking on on MSNBC. Any sad look at what happened with with Dnc and Ukraine and I'm trying to help dark Katy turn report. The anchor says: that's russian propaganda, a conspiracy theory. Now it's a politico story. You can't even trust mainstream news anymore, listen man for the longest time what I've been breaking down for. You is At the media will say something incorrect in fact check it, but what am I supposed to do when political says politico is wrong The news I would say there all reporting doesn't exist or is factually incorrect. I dont know tell you men, do I do never use political again ass, they don't know, but I can tell you one thing as I mentioned in my my video earlier this morning,

It's making Democrats go insane. Here's ears, the data, Republicans, don't trust news So when they see the two stories from politico, they say yeah whatever I dont care, because your fake news, but the Democrats believe it. What happens when your brain is trying to believe to stories from the same source. That say one last one is to two plus two is seven one plus one is to one plus one is one which would you believe, you're like what you're telling me both the same time will the Democrats tend to trust the news, so naturally, there confirmation, by default, to which our story fits their worldview, that's what, Media is doing there making money off this. So I don't know where we go from here on earth? The really don't it's Martha! Think about it. I mentioned before. If you write a fake story, people will click. It you'll get a million views the next day you retract. No one cares. You made the money. Revenue, its lucrative, but now the gun even better play.

Right, a story that says trumpeted backlit right to store the sad trumpeter from a front flip and people will click which ever one you know which everyone is is gonna play to their biases. That means, if I was gonna, make a video saying, trust the media or don't trust the media. I dont know which one Can I get more clicks? In fact, everyone did yesterday didn't do too well relit relative those. It was the worst that in a lot worse, my videos ever done in a long time, but I don't. I don't I'm not concerned about that was an important vetoing talked about it imagine if people someone's favour. Colors blue someone else's favour, colors green. How do we know which one's gonna generate most traffic doing both and most people look like their bias and that's what we're seeing now the New York Times in a short time period to stories that contradict each other, because the average person is gonna click which ever, why

fits, thereby us in one they say: here's a man who's who subverting our foreign policy by consulting a foreign government. Here's once I that's a big conspiracy, don't believe the right wing and then the left is gonna click that won the rising. Could that one and then neither is gonna, understand, what's really happening but there are times in care because they got your money anyway. So in the end, what can I tell you about trumped juniors book that it's complicated that not everybody booing him as a real supporter that some people are turned about whether or not there will be principle. You know people going to pull their principles. Is that will trump Junior just bending the knee because he's scared of bad press? You know what men, maybe maybe it's time we stopped caring about the media said. I think that's where I met at this point, because I want to tell you we don't maybe none of its true, maybe political right, maybe they're wrong, which political story gonna pick, which wanting to think is the right. One. You're gonna pick your bias,

and then we're all worse off for banks rang out cigarettes. Next Eichmann, coming up at six p m youtube com slashed him cast news. I will see you there. A new pole from Axiom says that politics are driving Democrats, man, not Republicans, Democrats, and I think I know why, for one there's a group of people, there were likely to be triggered, are angry and has a lot of reasons why you might claim it that that it that's the case sure, but I think it really comes down to trust in media republicans, dont trust, media engine they see fake news, they go believe it there's. Store. That contradicts the fake notion the guide and believe in the first place, how many bombs stories were retracted. Now you have Democrats who trust the news: Why would you know that was true and they made another story? Wait. What, but that's it is that true. How can they both through the same time, not explode? Us read this story:

before we get started, had ordered some guest outcome slashed on it. If you'd like to support my works, pay pal option, Crypto option physical address, but of course, the best. We can do. Is share this video The only way that I'm going to survive, especially with Umass Censorship, that's been hitting, is, if you guys I did a second time and have Facebook suspended me because I was reporting It was a blog. I could you not they suspended me. I'm it's now been lifted, but I don't know how much longer all last anyway. Nor do I care I get my Van Gogh. John go dried on other, have go fishing for the rest of my life, but let's learn about why Democrats are crazy actually says more than seventy percent of democratic politics is making them increasingly angry about America, leaving them for like strangers in their own land. According to an axiom on HBO Pole conducted by survey monkey, I tell you. I think that now part is right Democrats feel like strangers in their own land, because the news there, in fact is shock rage bait and they trust it is my opinion on what's happening right so think about it. You ve ever asked every

facing escalation of insane. Far left added to tearing content that makes you feel like you're live in this you know tromp is, is a fascist, and you know why supremacy and all these things are happy around you and you're like this, not the world. I grew up and Republicans, don't trust the media. Republicans, are saying it's all fake anyway, and so on go round and has had the world is. As it's been, that's fake, not real. I know the world I live in and the result is more. Seventy percent of Democrats feeling like they're, not in their own, stricter strangers. Democrats. Everything they watch read or listen. Their anger, even though Using voices of MP are the big picture Europeans as a whole are just plain mad and feeling like strangers in their own land, though, will lower percentage for publicans described themselves alert low, presented, Republicans described themselves angry. Fifty seven percent compared to seventy four

Democrats or feeling, like a stranger, fifty two percent to seventy one. Other people are getting angry or to fifty eight percent report, their friends family in color, Cassim anger than five years ago. Full stop man seriously. Think about it. I read this and I was dude. Everyone, I know is angry, like friendships are being tried and tested. Now for me for one. I have very few friends because I'm just a weird personal sits behind a camera all day, but that the friends I do have my being somewhat self deprecating. I have many friends stumbling out and that often become a workaholic, but my friends relatively normal people. We only get bad at each other. We have very different opinions, like my friends, get me to vote for burning again, like she's she's. Sending me all these messages about wives right non, like did never gonna happen like come on. Man I think he's peace. Peace crossed outline Betty way was no friends.

Mad at our cause? She likes Bernie. I respect that she likes Bernie. I just think she's wrong, you're gonna mean, but I started thinking about you know that some people. I know more art, particularly good friends, my neighbours, even These conversations are getting crazy. I was talking to someone recently. Angry when I was telling him like basic news facts and that's what I want to go I think I know other democratic going nuts. It's really simple. Democrats, trust media and the media contradicts itself so that their their world view is fractured by things that cat together, you can't simultaneously trust the media The same outlet publishing two different sorts. I could you not. I'm not an example of political writing to stories that That's a bull stories are wrong, ha ha what why don't trust the press right? So I look at a much laugh, unlike ok. Do whatever yaller crazy. Both stories must be frank. I have no idea or the first story might be real

but we must be more, they say those who talk about politics, the most are also the angriest eighty three percent of Americans who discuss politics several times a day report feeling angry least once a day over something they heard or read news that falls to fifty six percent among those who discuss at once a week and third nine percent for those who discuss it about once a month. Don't you Is it at all and you'll be happy the bottom line that republic in anger that animated the Trump rise and present presidency gets most of the media attention turns out. This is the bipartisan era of rage and estrangement, fuelled by rising interest in american politics. I tell what's what the result is civil war man? I've had so many conversations about this. Let me just stop you right there. They are Everyone always goes. The Americans are too lazy. I know I agree a civil war has ever been fought by the lazy or the majority what's happening? Is the people who vote are being pushed further and for

her away from each other. Social media is drowning out, centrist voices and the fringes of the left and the right are getting louder. Now. Republicans have absolutely no problem tearing down the fringes of the far right conservatives, but the left embraces it, and this means there's there's not going to be there. It's untenable UK me as a moderate I can see. My moderate friends is buying out saying this very few of them. You know for the most part, the dislike man I'm we're playing video games, but to the far left- and I see them openly embracing antivirus and that I'm just lying now. Now, I'm sorry, I'm not gonna support you, because your violent and limit your violent acts, but some so here's the thing. Let me now show you the best example past as to why this happens. What I posted a twitter threat of this morning, I know I know what to do what's the most distinct way to show you exactly what went down ha ha ha ha. Ok, ok, I'm so done! These people are insane. Journalism is dead. You guys can do get out.

Politico KEN Vogel Natasha here's the story from a Tasha to Julia Ani, Ukraine, officials, conspired where the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee to help boost the democratic nominees campaign and damage trumps candidacy? No evidence has emerged to support that idea, oh heavens, politico. No evidence has ever emerged to support this idea. Well, politico. I would like to show you political who wrote and twenty canvas Ukraine efforts to sabotage trope backfire. Kiev officials are scrapped, to make amends the President elect after quietly working to boost Clinton. What I thought political just told me, there was no evidence to support this idea of, but what you say they are caught quietly the boost Clinton. Perhaps the distinction here is that Giuliani thinks that actually conspired with the Clinton campaign.

Well, it says ukrainian government officials tried to help Hillary Clinton and undermine Trump by publicly questioning is that this refers. They also disseminated documents implicating a top trump aid in corruption and suggested they were investigating the matter only to back away after the election, and they helped Clinton's allies region to damage and information on Trump Anna's advisers, a politico investigation found now we say no, no TIM Clinton's I do not mean the Dnc or the campaign- ok, ok, ok or ukrainian american opera. Who is consulting for the Dnc met with top officials, and ukrainian Embassy in Washington, in an effort to expose ties between tromp top campaign aid, Pollyanna Fort and Russia. According to people direct knowledge exchange How about a Dnc consultant, meaning that the Ukraine Embassy to dig up dirt on top that's not Dnc collusion, then you might say no TIM are consulted, does not mean a came from the top down. Ok, fine, nothing I say will convince you. I get it, but let me just and by saying this

Natasha wrote. No evidence has emerged to support that idea, not prove it. If you only really believes Clinton colluded with the Dnc. Ok, you said support. I tell you this. The first story from political does support the idea. Does it prove it? No? Does it supported beyond a reasonable doubt? no, but support does not mean prove definitively. So I see how you are you. Are you ordered this so that support can be? You know, nebula also characterisation of what Giuliani thinks accord to Julia unease at a court from Giuliani. Did you ask him? Did you call me Giuliano what you think or Giuliani being hyperbolic and sang the Dnc referencing a paid consulted for the DMZ, helping the Clinton campaign, or are you stretching what you like?

That's Giuliani actually said to make it seem more extreme than it really was I'll, tell you this. Try this that to the first story, what is the irregular person supposed to believe when you see this news. Imagine you're a Democrat and the story: pops up and you're like Ukraine, efforts sabotage tromp wow, that's weird, but it never those anywhere. Well, then, a few years later you read this: how can you trust politico? So here's what I think happens, you see the people who realise what's happening, dont dopey, come Democrats, or they might walk away. They might see this and say they're lying to me endlessly. You can't trust the press, so let me show you this full More and more than nine and ten Republicans and conservatives who their trust in them, media has decreased in the past ten years. Time Republicans are less likely to trust news media, many of them

Democrats are more likely to trust news media that might actually be what causes some one to be a Democrat or a publican. If you read the news and they say Trump is a bad men and you believe it you're probably Five Democrat. If you read the news, they say trap is a bad man in your like naughty economies. Gotta, don't believe that then you might then become a republican the road or store. I love citing said that if you watch Fox news, you think economy is good if you watch MSNBC, think economies bed when I tell you this wire Democrat so angry because most media, the BBC, the New York Times even Moody's analytics they're, saying economy has gotten. So how can a democrat function with a fractured worldview? Many people who might have been democrats- people like me, I dont function with a fractured worldview. I look at the store than say: well then, the media's fake and then my worldview is based on media lying to me. So I don't trust him and then I look around me and I'm like everything.

Here, make sense everything here. Doesn't the Democrats or the people, the people who can see through that veil stay Democrats band of voting for mainstream candidate states that they have trouble arrangements and and, yes, let me break down the moderate different, because I know I know I'm sporting tossing Yang, but it's complicated that mean they smear tall, see as a russian ass an artist. Often I think it's obvious. She does not fall into the same camp, but the people who just believe the news there. It's like imagine living in two different realities, the same time, one where tromp was the victim of a crime yours he and one where he wasn't and their lying about it. You can't so what the Democrat then has to do is choose which which narrative must be correct. Now. The same is true for four publicans, but here's the well put when a story comes out? Can Vogel says he stands by owner, not not Vogel. One of reporters who are this causes Davis turn is worth extern. Maybe said this. They stand by their important. I did which for comment bidding

back. I know it's kind of silly because it's not like you know, couple hours enough time to respond, but they they they stand. There are pouring into political report, it certified. What am I supposed to do whom I supposed to believe? Well, what Atocha Route has no evidence? She just said. No evidence exists. I went found evidence you are wrong. Evidence exists now. If you want to dispute your own story and you right, we are just. Building a previous report from politico that I would be like interesting, but not out you did. It seems like a Toshiba, and this is another writer on this are, if you like it in doing any journalism It seems like they literally did no work to to look into why this has been I tell you this. There certainly is other evidence. Ukraine embassy can arms Dnc contractor solicited trumped up in twenty. Sixteen o John Solomon Owl. You can't trust him. Just you know the former head of investigative reporting for the Washington Post, but

is a conservative and a right wing. Guy, because he's be saying things you dont want to hear John Solomon didn't start, the story can Vogel did David Stern. Did John Solomon than corroborated but you're gonna call John Solomon, the conspiracy guy, I'm sorry politico, this all reps back into this point, I'm making I kind of feel like we moderates, don't trust news either, and you know what this luminous it's as the green is not changed and the purple is decreased, so they're asking change and media trust, others actually fair. I think if you were to break that prevented down into my view. I still do trust many media outlets. To a certain extent, I checked though, trust what verify and for the most part my trust has gone down significantly. Many many outlets have lost. My trust, ok, particularly politico, because I know what you're you answer doing, but I'm anomaly is critically Republicans have bowed out. Here is the point of trying to make. Why are Democrats so angry? The

The people who are disarm trying to stay in a fractured world of politics and news they specific our line. How news makes them the angriest? As I said, if you're somebody who's reading, politico and two stories pop up that contradict each other, your brain will break if you're somebody who, who sees that and so while the only conclusion I can come to us at politicos, followed is because BS, because both stories can't be true. Well, then, you might, find yourself saying I don't trust the media and then you might questioning whether at the Orangemen is actually bad Somebody who says they're both true you might find out that you're going to believe at the Orange man is bad because you trust every single story that comes out- and I very moderate like me distrust a lot about the media as about Trump, but you still trust some and there you go there. It is true, you know it's look. There are stories about tramp tramp has done bad things, Trump ordered a commando rate

Yemen, which killed an eight year old american girl. I know I reckon Obama for all the time, but I have said repeatedly trumps foreign policy is is to similar and that's one of them, no knows for me plus the soldiers. Radio, but for the most part I end up falling more more in line. You know against the left, because the Orangemen is not that bad, especially compared to abolish there's a lot of things Trump has done that I do not agree with you not wanting to have Trump Dorrell that the Milton staying at the golf resorts, I'm not saying it's on trumped specifically but come on man. We got it. We got us at hard lines here. What you did, I think, I think here, although for somebody else, and if Trump wins against economies, good then you'll be out and for its that simple, The people who read the news all they are being driven insane believing stories that can't possibly be true that contradict each other think about it. This way, Imagine reading this store in only the story. That Giuliani, insane conspiracy theories.

Really angry. You know well my God Donald Trump. What's he doing and then a man and you're a moderate and read both you're gonna be like they're lying. If the Democrats are only being fed the fake news and not checking it, they're gonna go insane That is happening so limitless. Let me say one more thing: rage bait generates traffic, making people angry generates traffic. We know it's true. The people who don't fat check their sources. The people want very on line very often or who just watch say: Brian Spelter, who praised Facebook and Youtube taking down journalism there only getting a skewed view of the world, because what the intent of someone like you know, brine, stouter or Oliver Darcy- is to make you angry not to inform you. I'm surprised to find myself saying this, but I have to say recently said to tune out Fox news. Anybody who tells you to not listen to as much as possible.

Is, is a dangerous liar. Are you this? As I often do not always right, you absolutely should watch reinstall it You absolutely should read Oliver Darcy. You should watch me I really do like telling people to like promoting David Technological disagree with him on a lot of things, but what they say about what what the right says about him. Lessons about me- and I thought that's perfect example so that there was one instance where we both published videos, but we could part where David said trumps approval all time. Low mindset approval all time high, and I argued why I thought my position made more sense and then I said specifically go because you might actually

says, don't don't wash up to them out stop now! That's that's weird! That's that's! That's a danger manipulation? and so now you have people who are all and the reason they do is the point. Is they want to get you angry? So you watch morsel, click more should become addicted, the anger, their purposefully driving people mad and the people on the left. Crafts who don't fact check are becoming angry and angrier, because the rage bait is working on them, Republicans less so because many republicans reject the media and there is so I'm allergic others. Twitter thought I wrote it's kind of funny will see if anything comes of it. Stick around next segments coming up at one p m on this channel and I will see Walden New of service for Youtube spell the end. Now is a complicated story, a lot of people freaking out, because in the new terms of service going into effect a somber tenth Youtube says that they can ban you if you're

channel is not commercially viable. That's right! If you're, frequently demonetized you to go, get rid of you now at another time What's going on? These changes are not going to have a massive impact. There is also another change, something called I think our law called copper. I don't know exactly what you know too much about it, but the basic ideas. You're gonna have to mark on your videos whether or not they could be for kids and as a lot of criteria of what makes something for kids. And if it is, you lose a ton of advertisements. Mania revenues gone guess what then you're channels not commercially viable anymore and then you're out what's happening, as you too was near. What is going to be on the platform bidding is not political. It's not you know, even though there is many political challenge, any monetize. Let me just say some you know over the car service operates

Huge loss Youtube also operates at a huge loss. Most of these companies operate at a huge loss. The reason they do it is they're trying to dominate the market and create a monopoly, and then once they control the space and no one can compete. They start pragmatic, making more profitable. So you to prolong time was operating a loss allowing Google to own online digital video, Nanda competitor, sure you got video. Now known Camelias, it don't wanna, see or video, but it does want to die. Then you can upload your video, you can share it. You ve got bit shoot now, which is which is fantastic. So for the most part there are other companies, but everybody knows you took the big dog, though the biggest hears it happens. Now you to want to start making money, and that means, if you upload- water, bottle, drinking challenge or bottle flipping, and they don't sell ads on it. Then you too losing money by allowing you to house that video

the original owners of Youtube, couldn't sustain it because video hosting is ridiculously expensive. Google subsidized dominated the market got an early and are they have it? All of you, smaller you to pursue, make a small amount of a small amount of money. You just gonna say listen. If you only make five bucks and a video not commercially viable gone us read the story, and I do what I do want to put a little bit gives us what's gonna, be real here, Youtube has always always reserve the right to ban you for literally any reason. What I think is happening is Youtube is To do these changes very slowly. The reason why there are hunting these changes now is so that everyone Here's about it. I don't think that's normal in a year to from now

someone get a notice, saying your cardinals, no longer commercially viable, so we're banning you. People are gonna, be like real, but we all knew that for two years. What's gonna happen, if they just did it out right, people would panic and that that would cause a huge uproar in the community will be very disruptive their platform. They need the Logan Palestinian case, Casey NICE Debts and, to an extent me, the milk toe spent centres in politics to maintain commercially for products that are too crazy and make mine, and I always for myself, they ve ranked me they ve. They ve been put pressure on this. Specifically my main channel some some robots, but you know what they like my main channel. Why actually have people, Google com you on the phone? because I do mainstream politics. I push back a bit unsummoned on some of these stories, but I'm in they'll tell Spencer it's it's commercially safe. That's what matters hate him pool talks, positive swear, he doesn't condone hate speech and his opinions are particularly strong.

He does push back a lot of the media narratives? But it's not too controversial known. Really, talks about a minute makes us money which look at other political commentator, Stephen crowd of. For instance, oh wait he's been removing part of programme, his generals no longer commercially viable. Will they get rid of him? I don't think so. That's too big of a channel, but I will say that commercial but it could also be you know, creating new users and I'd Imagine someone like crowd or is gonna bring a non Youtube's onto Youtube, which will then make them money in other ways, but it basically means if you produce our no avant garde, art and strange content that gets relatively low views and are trying to build a brand Europe. This really means is moving forward. Only those who are already famous will be able to use. You took us think about it. You started new channel and then what nobody watches. Your videos are expensive. Toast and Egypt says sorry, that's not commercially viable, the! U N!

Tube- is going by by its been going away for a long time, but through the story from the verge Youtube is wrong. Updated terms of service and is our tenth and a new line acts as a reminder that company doesn't have to keep any video, but I want to, Youtube, is under no obligation to host or serve content. While another way of saying just because you tube, as is relatively open platform, it doesn't mean the company is required to keep videos on Youtube s face criticism from all sides over its video removal process. Some critics argue that Youtube could do more to take down videos that bought up against the company's rules, but don't outright violate them. Others argued that Youtube ought to be a fully open platform and shouldn't control. It remains up and what doesn't executives have long defended the platform as it

happy in a free speech, but it started to clamp down on the type of videos allowed to circulate, but let's sit so here's a story about statistics out here we have the terms of service as of July. Twenty second in Europe, of his great britain- and this says civically. Let me let me make sure I kinda accounts count, suspension, intimidation, they say you do, may terminate your access or your google account access to all or part of the service. If you tube reasonably believes that its provision to the service to you is no longer commercially viable and everybody's forget over this line. Listen, it's been in effect in the UK, and there are many political traders who are not pull commercially viable, who have not been banned make sure it's clear right now you ve got a whole lot to worry about. It's. The new creators. Youtube knows they ban some one big it'll, create a big pressed Ormond, it's bad for them, but putting this

Place now means they can start nipping the buds before they become beauty pie. You see, puny pie got really big and for a while, you too was loving it up until the media started to use pretty pie to attack them, and we made some mistakes, so I believe, based on what I've seen who I've talked to you too, but does not want you to famous when someone gets famous because of you to the responsibility, is on Youtube and make that that nine people say look at the platform on look what they ve done. What Youtube. Just famous people who use our hosting service they don't want the responsibility, for that Finally, viable line made everybody anger, but here I showed you this specific terms of service from July twenty. Second, ok, it's long since passed. Have there been great problems in the UK for the most part, not really. We then have this. This is that this year, the current terms of serve for you to the current terms of service straight up, say we can

when you for any reason. So here thing, I think the reason they're gonna be adding. That Leinen has nothing to do with the ability of em to ban people. I don't believe it. I've big changes to anyone who is already on the platform. The intent is to see the idea so that, in the end, in the next wave of new credit the future they'll just tell you like hey. We appreciate that you apply for the partner programme, but you're channels not commercially viable and therefore we are not going to move forward at this time. And their conditions. They are so sad, whereas five years ago, even you know even and later, you could literally started Channel put up as much confidence you wanted and thence are making money. The other. The other things going to do is here's another protection. I have channels that upload long form content with love your ship. So if you do a pod casts two hours long and you're getting you know a hundred toward Viewers- Europe, that's really expensive too.

Nobody's watching it, they don't want to pay for it. There's also channels that do like s m are, as well as like white noise channels that will play like you're storms, you know on a rainy like a rainy day outside on the beach or something, and those very it will be like two hours long, you just gotta pay for that they gotta and and and other gonna make money at. Probably not so you to business are calling all of this stuff, but they're gonna. Do it very slowly and they're gonna start from the bottom of the bigger channels? Don't notice I'll, tell you what man I'd be willing to pay. There's gonna be a ton of people. You two creators who are doing really really well making a lot of money and therein it get their mouths shut, Youtube gonna, say: hey, you know, they're, not gonna, say explicitly, but basically, if you don't toe the line, your career is done. Now, should scary, you tube roped everybody and they said come come start a business start a business with us here

and then what happened video last year. A prank video band We are well aware, I would taken the video down too bad you're gone, we don't care machine learning, you're out, so Let me tell you, there's a story that I really like in terms of what the easiest way to explain this for one. We all know that Facebook periodically changes how Facebook works- everybody always gets mad, so Facebook learn to read out changes very very slowly and only to some people? The famous story about this is Ebay when Ebay first started with the website was yellow and apparently people like it or are like you know, new users had a problem with the company want to change it so wonder they made it white and everybody flipped out saying on I hated, I can't stand its different. It's weird understand it, so they changed back into the backlash, but an everyday slowly, incremented, the color of yellow towards white and nobody realized it was a change- is we're so subtle

about a year later this I was totally white. Nobody cared. There was no backlash, you do it slowly. Fast changes made people angry, I'm seeing a ton of people complain saying I'm gonna get banned by Charles over no. No! No! No! Now, if you're already on Youtube your fine, but there are small channels, particularly news channels that are not commercially viable. There are a lot of channels that are not cook commercially for several reasons they could be, but you doesn't want them, and I will say this: my channels are commercially viable because I'm a military, Fenster, Stephen Crowd or, on the other hand, he's risky and that's where the real danger comes, and I do not believe someone like crowd or will be banned. I believe Stephen we'll be fine and he may even get back into the part of Europe we will see, what happens? Maybe areas our outermost Utrecht, what he's doing, but let's There's somebody who's younger, who has the exact and opinions is crowded and launch the channel in the exact same format you tube will stop them immediately, not right now it's gonna be gradual and slow, but

Tell you this in five years. You will not see channels like mine, you will not There are going to get the purge Youtube knows. If they ban me, people will panic and fully the platform because their businesses are being run. The strategy in my opinion. Right now, is do not let the seeds grow, the plants that are already growing. We can't trim them otherwise, people panic, but those new buds that are popping up without a cut him off Youtube is making sure everyone knows that You too wants to be Netflix. I've known this for years, because you two people told me this: they want premium. Tv shows I'll. Tell you what you to really really hates this package, you not. They hate the idea of talk radio on Youtube. You, too, wants to be fun. Adventures shown you beautiful landscapes. They want to be a voice.

YO platform. They don't want it to be something where someone turns on the video and then click so different tab and go about their business. While they listen, that's an audio platform. You together want to do that, but guess what you tube dominated everything. The way you two works, the partner programme. The way this system is even pod, casters would rather be on Youtube. Then you know than other is other websites, and so then what ends up happening. While you too has unintended consequences of their actions you too, This is, then you know they do want didn't wanna make P2P. Pity pie was just the algorithm it worked. There is that other van host woman, who got like two million followers and a couple days or in a couple weeks, because you just happen tat the algorithm, precisely as you know as needed, shows the right person the right time. You two dozen have the intention of making celebrities they want to make money, they want to prevent celebrities who can cause them damage this step one. So is it at the end of you to write

Yes, absolutely thank you. Thanks rang out of you enjoyed it in a few years. I won't be here will see what happens, but it's not gonna be overnight there. Slowly be changing this. The shoreline slowly pulling back, but eventually you'll leave, go to the beach to see all the beautiful shoreline, everything you love, we were seen without you noticing and then day. You know decades from now, they'll be some little kid asking you why you hang out on the Sandy dunes and you're gonna, be like we ve always hung out here. We use the surf men. We surf anymore, the waters all gone now. It's just a big sand, desert awesome. Send as yet annual leave their stick around next segment is coming up at four p m. You d come slashed him gas news and I will see you all on site. You took accomplished him cast at four p m. I will see you all their employees a vice and buzz feed are worried. Their equity is worthless as did you don't media's fortunes fade

you know. Who's fortunes are not worthless the people at the top, who sold out at the right time and made themselves very wealthy, well convincing you to work for low wages because we were, we are the best and we're gonna hook up somewhere with some equity. Because what happens We actually is eventually worth nothing once again. This is actually a sort of caprice ago, but there's more when more news about the troubling times faced by media and while have no beef with No I've documented in awhile, maybe here and there on the internet, what we are seeing now vice employs Buzzfeed employees who are made promises about getting. Woody in getting shares and and some other things I don't know what what what is private or is it, but basically you know you're gonna get rewarded if the company succeed, and then the investment dries up the company's evaluation. I was down and now what you were promised as worthless, and you invested So much of your life, some people,

comes a shares, are not gonna name anybody specifically. What are you work for Busby? They offer you shares. If you leave, you lose those share that the vast at a certain point- or you know, they're there, their stock or rights or complicated, complicated there are circumstances where they tell you. We're gonna give you that suitable. A million dollars, but can't leave for three years. What happens then, three years later, when the company is worth nothing? Congratulations, you took a ban, and you lost so as we are seeing this downfall of digital media. This is the ramifications. Let's read the story business inside of this a vice media that reputation, for paying low salaries, but cofounder shades method

really used to go around telling people they'd get rich from their stock options. Someday quote a lot of people built up their equity on the promise of something happening, and it still hasn't happened and happened for checking. There's gotta massive mansion and Santa Monica set a former vice, employ a lot of people here, a lot of people there feel they stuck his employment alone. A number of fast growing digital startups gave options or other equity compensation to employees, to convince them to help build media companies of the future and, in some cases, leave established media outlets to do it. According to interview with seven parent or former employees of these companies, there was a and some on early stage employees that one day their companies would have a big exit and their hard work would be rewarded with an amount big enough to finally pay off their student loans, maybe even mega housing payment. Now employees of these startups are seeing their hopes of getting rich off shares, fading we're story

It was Expos and MIKE Dotcom woke social justice outrage. They were manipulating social justice activists activists for rage clicks. Once again, we can Another story about these young individuals all of these promises but tell you what man you know: everybody's got out responsibility for their own decisions, and I understand that you were convinced and you believed in these companies. Well now, you know maybe should start your own company, maybe should have taken something more tangible, always take the cash right. Don't take the promotion. Take the cash, it depends. Both Reed digital media companies have been squeezed John Chan joined. Must be, and twenty eleven when the company was only around thirty people, love everybody was working on a mission said Jane who went on to Co. Founder native, lift

We were at the cusp of the social web blowing up. There was just there was just massive potential. As a publisher, we were the internet, darling advertisers were knocking at the door. There was an outspoken shared feeling that this is something big we're part of U S facing funding and digital media nearly doubled from twenty thirteen. Twenty fourteen to more than two six million dollars. According to pitch book, some companies, including HUF Post Bleacher report and business insider sold for high prices and lots of jobs, were created, though many were also lost. Vesper day three of the most heavily funded digital media companies, Buzzfeed vice and vocs, are still independent, but have laid off staff and at a diversified, get ongoing profit

only as their core digital advertising. Business has gotten squeezed. Many employees told business insider. They assume the stock options they got in. These companies are largely worthless at this point, although it's hard to say what their with their actual values and because the companies are private, it's difficult to trade in those options or convert them to cash. This is amazing, they tell, These young people is ideal. If it can people you gonna write the story got it, you got it. You gotta make the rage bait, but don't worry we're part of something big here. We're going to give you a piece of the company when they never go public. You can't sell it. So what do you get you stuck? They ve convinced these young people to keep working in the mines churning out angry anger, anger inducing social justice content while they make all the profits by big old mansion and disappear, and then everything's come come crashing down. Man I'm gonna void sayings. Ok, I will void, saying certain things: gonna wanna get sued hours

insane insults, don't don't worry, I'm not withholding information about vice or anything now going to ask you to say something rather insulting, but not, but I'll. Stop myself. In general, people were earlier. Hires could have done well if they exercise their options at a price well below the height of the company's valuation. Often at a time of the last fundraising round, but for more recent hires who are still holding their options. They much higher ex exercise price. Its unclear through options will ever amount to much. The general rule is the earlier you get in the better. If you are employing over five, you may have a decent payday if you're a common shareholder said Adam Augustine, RO a senior research analysed at equities on a secondary market. Ok, we're here common shares common last to get paid their at the bottom in general, the options these company, it should employ, are uncommon shares that means at these. Companies selling a discount to peak to the pig evaluation. Their investors gave them any deck holders, and investors of preference will be paid in line will be, it will be for

in line to get paid and common shareholders are dead last and the more people choose to exercise their option. The less money there is to distribute among all of them, to quote the Simpsons. It was my retirement. Greece set an early, Buzzfeed exec, I'm still, probably, but probably between a down payment and a kids college education. But that's me and a lot of people don't even have that this is a buzz feed. Exec, basically saying he's, got what what is it very grand twenty or thirty? dollars as it as an as an original executive. That's that's it! That's that's kind of awful when you realize how many people got really really wealthy off this. There were other catches for ok, ok out, you know I want to say the insult I'm I am. I am going to give my personal opinion about some digital media companies that will remain unnamed and in no way is in reference to any of any particular organization. A full disclaimer, we're about to say, is my personal opinion and as nuts to do with any company and anybody who assumes otherwise is making it.

Someone and any any reference it's too short and existing company or potential and its a coincidence honestly say when you hear stories about companies that make you all these promises, brain Allah's investment, and then it flights. That sounds like a ponzi scheme in reference to no one individual, I'm just saying so. It sounds like right, not saying it is because you will get sued for that kind of stuff for Serbs seriously. There were other catches for a period advice. The price to convert options to shares was in the five figures for a period making. Cost prohibitive. For many, the former exact there said. That means they would have to spend a lot of money. They didn't essentially have to buy shares whose value will still be a largely in question until the company exits or goes public on paper, it would amount to

one million dollars From options and had unrealistic expectations fed by their company companies, leaders or not about their potential winnings,

Companies also stress that they pay competitive benefits and salaries vice, for its part, has increased retirement benefits and set a goal of fixing pay disparity after settling a pay disparity loss, and I will say you know the reference earlier I think vice. Actually, I think chain really did try to make sure he was taken care of people. I know its not perfect is a lot of people are really meant the company, but I think of all the places I've worked, but maybe look people realise this pay was low. There was a mission, but I right, I do think you know there wasn't. There was no intention to like ruin. Someone's life and experts them to extreme degree, though I must say on a scale of one to ten there, not a ten vices, not a tourist were being you know, generous benefactor, who are here to save the little guy now on. I think for the most part, its business, but I do think Vice- did a bit better than a lot of places. I've worked at were seen not for everybody there are decent amount of people. Advice were very unhappy, but yeah. You know I don't think shaken up over everybody

Does anyone want to buy vice stock today, anyway? Yes, so here's what underpinning all of those things your promised people advice is worthless and we're gonna buy, they going to say that we raise wait. What why one point, four billion so much? They re they found it until six Buzzfeed raise nearly five hundred million for money from Comcast one point: seven billion and a one point: seven billion valuation to grow to fourteen one thousand four for the employees of the end of twenty teen Buzzfeed expects to be profited by the pop pop For the second half of this year, having laid off staff

by traditional media. Then the company was the subject of a New York Times, exposing about me to problems in a race towards forty million dollars and Debt Disney wrote down its vice. Take this year effectively valuing at stake at virtually nothing. Vices evaluation is down to four billion after acquire refineries. Twenty nine, which is really bad. It's a vaccinated twenty eleven and raised more than thirty four million, including two hundred from from Comcast, reportedly turn a small profit. Twenty teen it acquired New York media. This fall. With the hope of leveraging its media, entertainment, luxury and beauty, advertising and economists business. Well I'll tell you ass, a wrap it up. Buzzfeed cells cook, where Walmart, they found a way to make money. I guess but here's the thing you Norman take what you can get now

maybe maybe I'm wrong about this, but if someone offers you a lump sum verses, like you know, PAN Yacht over time take the lump sum you can do something with it now. I have people constantly telling me like what are you going to invest in and, unlike myself, you know, I make money where what we grow. Ok, that's the mission I feel like in all these people more take like look what I took nothing from vice. I did not get taken stock of like that, and I want it. What we think you think I'm here to work on your ship for the rest of my life, none and now I'm in here to work on your ship and then I have plans for both in my own boat and that's what I did so. I think some is allowed people via really like good people. I've met belong, lay some bad people. It is it's like working in any place since it tough company to work and I'll, say this, but I'm not interested in any of this stuff. Like you promised me, sack now

cash upon the bank, I save it and then I'll invested in myself. I'm not gonna, invest in you. I don't know you. I don't trust you, unlike what you're doing fine, I'm gonna invest in me. So if you have confidence in somebody else who invest them fine, but for me I don't play that so now all these people took this deal. They, I hoped another stock and they can't do anything with it. Congratulations, media is collapsing and all of these people, they're gonna, feel it stick around. I've got a couple more segments coming up in a few minutes and I will see you will shortly. I'm gonna go ahead and make a bold statement that, in my opinion, Google, is stealing health records from millions of Americans.

I know stealing might be considered a statement of fact. I just my opinion. Ok because they're taking it without the patients being informed. So in my opinion, if we take something from somebody without telling them that sounds like stealing, Google is evil. Google is evil right now you tube will ban me. If I say one name, a name. You know it's funny. I can talk about really of things and risk being banned, but say one name band now, where we learn all once again or planned. Dirty games. Google secret project, Nightingale gathers personal health data on millions of Americans a massive health records from ascension facilities and twenty one states patients not yet informed man. I love it. You know what you don't really bothers me. I was hoping that we will be made it to the nightmare. Just opium would at least have flying cars and honey boards. I was really hoping that could be like you know, like wrist computers that could like project holograms, maybe you'll be cool, maybe the havoc bionic on with a grappling hook.

And there would be an adventure and maybe like a resistance fighting. But now, when we get, we get whiny Why do youtubers complaining about big companies, while other people watch people on Youtube? we're just Opie as some dumb glasses, beanie wearing Idiot, complaining about how all these companies are evil, but continually sitting in his room using said platforms to complain about these companies man that sounds like it is terribly to me. I gotta admit I don't know what else to do. I feel like telling you How far right, but let's be real, I mean clearly recognise here? I am going like last global. Evil. We must do something about it. I know I'll just keep talking about how their evil. I don't know what you do. I mean. I'm I'm I've been bribed advocated for some kind of regulation on these companies. But listen, you know, Google face look there there Amazon there so massive that

I don't know everything Google's doing this. Why you need good journalism and the Wall Street Journal spreading? like two to financial times and watch it general. The only actually subscribe to. But here is we know that evil I mean dude, listen, Google is is is- is destroying the news industry. Okay, and a lot of journalists are angry when creating this low class of vulture withered addicted people scraping at the ground for stories, because Google search is dominating and there's a lot of is a lot of problems at Google is created and Youtube monopolize the space are taken all the money and once they own it, they shut down news. Like I said I can't I can't say name, but now this is scary ripe. Why are they taking your health records manual to my health records? What it? What I saw my here's my business and you want, but you, if you want, take my regiment permission now, but we get it Google's evil. So you know what else we can do about it

where's your journal says: Google is teeming with other countries largest how here systems on a secret project to collect and crunch the detailed personal health information of millions of Americans across twenty one states accord two people familiar with the matter and internal documents. The initiative code named project Nightingale appears to be the largest a series of efforts by Silicon Valley Giants to gain access to personal health data and establish a toe in the massive healthcare industry Amazon out Microsoft are also aggressively pushing and healthcare, but they haven't yet struck deals with Skype, not stop. There's some good news. It's actually kind of a good thing, there's butlers, let's put us beat, must be rational. If the. If these big systems and artificial intelligence have your history, they met the of the fine,

You know cancer well before even realize it, so there there's their stories about how I discovered certain women were pregnant. You know because this aren't looking at certain products and the airport tune to together, or they started like we're in Facebook sense and Facebook goes when you go to. After so what happens and have taken your that they take your healthcare data on a human being might see. Like you know, justice comfort, taken together, it's just called take em, I programme or whatever, as another accord, it says, like you know you trouble, breathing or, like you know, ladder problems. They might see those individually and a lot of doctors can see signs and and and- and you know, correlate hey these things line up with this potential disease, a compeers gonna, do it better a computer is gonna, be like we tracked that that that the records of everyone who ever got leukemia now we can predict leukemia the day those those cells start forming and we can get rid of it immediately. How amazing would that be imagined this

finding an own business there's their stories like this you're mine that people you know all the sun. What I feel sick they go to the hospital, they say: yeah, it's cancer, I'm sorry! We are too late if only we found it sooner. Imagine this you're sitting in your room, you're playing video games and also your phone books and says you're, you're, York, behaviors and records indicate a high probability of leukemia interlinked whoa. I feel fine, you doctor, and they say up there. It is while it's a good thing. We caught it literally the date started. You know we can treat it now and you you're going to go. That's the Good NEWS about this. The bad news about this is that well listen if we're being purists at assuming all of the benevolent corporations are here to help us. Yes, a good thing, the bad that the bad, in my opinion is where things are getting substantially worse. People who you dont know are gonna have access to it, private information. We know human beings will behind the screen, they'll be abusing its like us. The question then comes first, if you want to ask for my permission to take my data

I actually might be willing to share that with you, because I don't want I just switched because I'm reading screen so off did its blue light filter, it's better! It's it's a right anyway. The point is I wouldn't care as an issue of privacy invasion and the erosion of our rights and massive corporations thinking they have a right to take from you without your mission. We ve already seen our Facebook abuse day with came. We can look up, we know behind the scenes. When no things about you, they shouldn't know the question that arises. Should we allow them to do it? In my opinion, no, if Google wants to ask they can ask and they should in a lot of any now that you ve got like the data laws in the UK now and I think the potential the potential for what I could do in terms of healthcare is amazing, I'm totally for it

Like you, you everything I just struck in some really really awesome right. If I think until wisest bad how's that evil, then I say, lives for terrorism, we have to make sure we never a road down the path of allowing individuals behind the scenes, control things about us less. They use that power in ways that are bad for us. There could be bad people really put us. Look, let's go see possible worst worst case scenario. Don't we don't open, there's somebody who isn't like you look to Europe Kurds? What's this, allergic to some rare flower and then all of a sudden someone delivers them. Your workplace, you open up and that's occur. The scenario as not likely gonna happen. What's really gonna happen someone's got to laugh at you, they're going to see,

you, know images or x rays or who knows what kind of data there taking and they're gonna laugh about an earnest share with their friends and that's not there right now should be to do. It is also the potential of the government and bad actors and corporations want to stop you from doing something. They don't like. There's another big problem with mass data collection. Let's say Emma S may also be a little bit of stretched, but let's say you are doing something, but government doesn't like what's totally legal. Ok, there are bad actors and government, let's be real, they get around then all the time for corruption like the governors in Illinois. Do you want those people to be able to go to a private corporation and and get records? What? If then like, look? Look? We have the dna stuff people are submitting their dna for fun. Little hope you get my dna and turns out law enforcement are tracking. It never consented this. So I think we're we're headed for we're we're in the nightmare. Just opium. Ok, we're we're in it. This is it it's boring, I'm kind of upset,

at least, if we were gonna beat us Toby. At least I could get like a bionic grappling hook. You know, unlike swing around, have robotic lags, unlike there's. Fighting enough now not turns Roger, similar houses. Eating pizza on these crazy companies are stealing our data and use it in ways. We don't know about they say: Google launch the effort last year with Saint Louis, based ascension, the country second largest health health system, and how do they know? How do they have the rights? That is what it is. The data involved lab results, doktor diagnosis and hospital ascension records among other categories and amounts to a complete health history, including patient names and date of birth. Neither patients nor doctors have been they're, stealing our information at least a hundred Google employs of already at have already have access to much of the date on tens of millions of patients. According to a person familiar the matter and documents, look away with Cambridge Analytical, there was a huge scandal without access to data they shouldn't have had, and it was used to create voter,

Files and a lot of people are angry about nothin. You trump supporters are popular like turning the other wailing tromp elected it helped him out, but certainly the left is perhaps as an issue where we can say: hey, Google, evil. They shouldn't be steel our health records. Some ascension employees have raised questions about the way the data is being collected in shared accorded documents, but privacy experts- It appeared to be permissible under federal law, that law, the health, insurance portability and accounting The act of ending six generally allows hospitals share data with business partners without telling patients

the information is used only to help the covered entity carry out its healthcare functions. Wow. What about doctor patient confidentiality gone? Do there's reasons for this. I dont want strangers to know I'm in actually. Personally, I dont care they'll. Ask me I'll. Tell ya barely go the doktor I broke my had once Mighta Katy Stone five years ago for five years by five years ago that, whatever you know, there's a big deal, but Then some people are very private matters that I want to talk about. Some people be very self conscious about telling strangers about them. Well, now, you're part of a massive database. Google in this case is using the data to design new software, underpinned by advance artificial intelligence and machine learning that zeros and on individual patients to suggest changes to their care staffers across across alphabet ink. Google's parent have access to the patient information documents, show ok, ok,

Actually like the idea, I wish they were doing it anymore, libertarian fashion, which means getting permission telling people are like explicitly saying to them. I'm sick of these things. Words like sign here. If you agree and have buried things, and no Google should go to the individuals and say hey with your data, we might be able to help you and predict illnesses in advance. I'd be like dude due to it precede you coming in getting my permission, this is corpus corporate is is: is corporations continuing to harvest our data with no regard to what we believe we should have access to what what what we believe should be private and I'm sure, there's gonna be a lot of people. Some religious people, for instance we're gonna, be shocking. Angered by this you know we have a right to our lives and our privacy and its eroding everyday, but you have we gotta go those evil. A Google spokesman said the product is fully compliant with federal. I don't care about like about ethics and morality, and I think you taking data might get her out of that permission.

Wrong, because people have a right to choose right. My data, my choice, stick around. I got one more segment coming up for a few minutes and I will see you all surely moderates. Conservatives are facing a symmetrical warfare in the media industry. How many missed organizations have targeted Rachel Matt out to get her shot down after her insane. Russia get conspiracy nonsense. I none how many act best targeted, Tucker Carlsson and got adds pulled from his show many and they keep doing it and it gets gonna keep happening, asymmetrical warfare, projects, toss smeared slammed and lied about relentlessly. Ok, they make upstart, and and James had assumed and he's got the wall of attractions. Two very it's a very funny thing he does Why are they smearing slamming virtuous so much because there is a symmetrical warfare going on? At the same time, you have pro public on a five or one c, three, that rights Anti trump pieces.

Why? Why? Where? Where is anybody calling them fringe can speak? see dishonest or whatever it doesn't exist. Us be real. The media is absolutely buys in favour of the left and I'll. Tell you this. It's no one's fault, but the right you know and Virginia all. The Democrats, like one state, Yet Republicans, weren't even running these Democrats running unopposed and everyone's shocked Democrats wish yeah. Well, maybe you need to get up and go do something. That's all you want men. The inherent flaw of the right in this country is individualism shocking. As an economic property individualist thing, as I was in for the trunk tower ones, and I saw a trump supporter while those protests going on- and I said well, you protest and he's ignored or not mean I mean that's it. Collectivist are gonna form collectives and in

media there predominantly left and there is no powerful right wing, meaning machine on par with the left. Has there is right wing media foxen is the biggest China but come on. We know all of his other channels are dominated by left wing voices. At brings me now to the story. Jug lagoon, I believe in prosecuting incorrectly. Maybe I'm not Leggum facebooks top news executive is Campbell Brown she's in charge of facebooks new Facebook NEWS, Tab Brown also cofounded her own media out of the seventy four, where she maintains an active role in this. Weeks she's been savaging Elizabeth, worn it's that that what has rounds media out of the seventy four has recently described as the second coming of Karl Marx, a million who raves about socialism and other talk and another tired politician according to seventy, or worn is not a straight shooter and lacks immoral center. I should actually you can upload. That was with worn. Is Hillary Clinton you put on a burning sanders mask to convince the progressive in the far left that she is on their side.

But combined she's an establishment player all the way, no wise it matter. Why doesn't matter that of Facebook? Top music SEC is on the board of this media company. I certainly don't care, but the journalists are freaking out two thousand re tweets poem by Say Facebook is, is protecting. Conservatives dude Facebook is barely working with conservatives. You found one person and you're out raged how many people can. I point two

here's a they. Do they say: mainstream media. Isn't lip is no liberal bias. There is, but because they are the dominant voice, they just keep saying it, and everyone just believes that there, the dominant voice, he says the seventy four was founded with support from Trump Education Secretary Betsy Divorce. After divorces, nomination Brown praised her as a born decision maker, thick skinned and impervious to hostile criticism. The seventy four has been effusively about divorces tenure. Wouldn't facebook object to this dual role for Brown, quite the opposite: Zuckerberg donated six hundred thousand years. I'm sorry Sucker Burg donated section two thousand dollars this year is eager to read too fast Facebook, Wilson

suspending me they can't do it in my mind and in regards to myself, I'm not even playing the in games. The conservatives, ok with a conservative, say this person is worker by not stuff. I hear that it's true but my main issue, as you cannot shut down public debate. You won't argue about some woman who started a company please do conservatives exists everywhere. This is ridiculous. Where are you going to complain about pro public up using five once you three status, but writing overtly political stories which have a huge impact on the election? I thought they were supposed to work both to do that. I don't know it look. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe maybe propose five allowance.

For. I have no idea, let's Red Brown maintained an active role at the seventy four, excepting her position with Facebook. According to document, while the IRS Brown spent five hours per week, the equivalent of one point five months of full time work on a seventy four point: seventy five hours and we come on chill tube the freaking out twice. Aventine is the most recent year iris dots are available. Facebook did not cues about her current role, but made no effort as our questions about our current role, but made no effort to downplay her involvement. Brown reported spending the same amount of time on the seventy four twenty sixteen when she was editor in chief, so mean she has just a minor consulting rollin. She popped in from time to time, Brown has defended the inclusion of bright barked, the noxious right wing site known for, wondering white nationalism and publishing a slave and accurate information as a trusted source and Facebook NEWS, yeah sort of news guard, so here's the prob

when you actually look at real journalism, they're gonna be a bit more balanced, they're gonna say luck. I interest, and I disagree with vetoes he's outlets organism. Anyway, I read vocs. I read Buzzfeed, I read the daily call, a daily wire and I say, look their progress, but I'm trying to make sure I read everything and I will tell to do the same reason, which is possible from left to right centre, uptown whatever, but it's funny how there Europe S bright part. Why is bright part being wise today? these two being allowed the daily these pumps, our fake news, I've gone through several stores, there's overtly made at the wash it imposes made up stories. They miss frame things you wanna play games will play games, let's be real, just because you don't think they're right. Does it mean they're? Not right? I mean I've got political

claiming politico is wrong and even though its go on at the time, because news outlets contradict ourselves, he then goes on to link this story about republican political operatives who call the shots at Facebook seriously. Do you realize that there are people these companies of all political backgrounds and their predominantly left wing, and conservatives at Google and Facebook have been raising a stink This well miss round. She she came out and said the seventy four is not part of Facebook NEWS. What news and the FBI seem does not and has not supported the fourteen seventy four anyway. I still care deeply about the issues of seventy four covers, so remain on the board of directors, with no editorial role and make personal donations to nonprofit. He says, Campbell Brown, dismisses the pieces savaging Warren because they pinion pieces. Oh, this is correct and seventy four exclusively features opinion that are high

critical of war and that's a choice. So I see it ends, should CNN be removed from Facebook, now CNN, Savages, Donald Trump, that should be allowed news organisations can't public opinion, peace, that are angry with politicians. Ok, we'll start with yours, dude you're, to really doing which are complaining about it. I'm sick of the hypocrisy see I'm not I'm not here for the left, the right, whatever I'm here for facts and guess what There are many stories thereby discovered. I've checked and I've been correct. The left completely ignored. But we see knows what it where CNN it to see it on talk about the upstream, we're neighbors, Siena's, nope, guess who picked it up right wing media. This is predictable There are so many stories we'll google it I'll get nothing but like these examiner, the daily call the daily wire the only people reporting on these things will come from the right and I'm thinking to myself. Why aren't they morning, because you know what conservatives do report on the same things left. This brings me back to a bigger point that that has changed a bit.

When I was in an interview with Jack Dorsey on Rogan pot cast they were they mentioned that, when journalists only follow up and journalists, conservative journalists follow both and there it is this guy is shocked because outsiders bubble people believe different things than him and he's furious that they would run opinion pieces negative about us with worn. Ok, do I invite you to go to sea I'm right now and go to opinion. I just see which Orangemen bad. What about what about brain cells? show. It's always the same thing. You know he wants to complain that trumpets rhetoric towards the press is wrong. We cannot allow this but it certainly responsible of gigantic unaccountable tech companies to say sir information? That is a huge political effect man. These people, I tell you what its hypocrisy its finest, but in the end the it's. It's only the fault of the Republicans in the right.

Oh I know, and then they'll be men will say. Would you mean is on our full business? Isn't it was pointed out by came a robot? Was a conservative pointed out, conservatives do commentary, and, and and liberals do journalism in commentary. There's your big problem. There are outlined that Conservative that do source news, but a lot of them are like small blogs. I mean they're good ones for sure gotta be examined. Are you ve got you ve got with another good example like an index amateur for now not perfect Ok, because a daily while the daily collar are very much commentary hears it happens, the left will produce a story and the right we'll take the story than comments on it. It's to an extent similar to what I'm doing as well, though, on the bit moderate, I recognise that. However, I am funding journalism. I am working to grow in it Van Journalism. I think you gotta give ya to realise that a lot of these commentators and lot of these rightwing sources are just taking, It was on the left and then ripping on it, and here is the problem with that. Your play,

in their narrative. So there look if there are tons of right wing outlets in a fox, the Walter Journals opponents action is a bit more to the right. They exist and when they set a story they control. The narrative vocs would have you believe that fox its veto acts when everybody that Fox NEWS controls in air- that's not true men. They comment on other stories, so it's like it's like the question of. When did you stop beating I feel that what would have happened is the left or right a story saying we asked when you know Mister Smith stopped beating his wife and then the right will make a video talking about Mr Smith, beings, and arguing against it ignores and because the narrative was set by but be the establishment of the game anyway, the point of this video, as I gotta weapons, have taken a phone call right now, but are there so angry that Facebook is is, is actually trying to make sure there doing something? That's of balance their furious about it. Well, I can't SAM surprise because they live in a bubble. Perhaps it can get out of that bubblin real

is that, while the seventy four may rag on was before, and you can open up any one of these other sites and see them