The mainstream media is declaring war on Youtube, and they are escalating dramatically and quickly. Of course, many of you, probably familiar with the vocs add pockets. Many channels got wiped out at that got their modernization, removing the chemic money anymore because of vocs one of these channels made videos of like nature sounds: could you not historical channels, teachers etc and vocs doubled down after this, with a letter demanding more. We saw an article from Cnet where they targeted advertisers that appeared on gaming channels because they felt the gave the gamers worse sometimes angry and it worked people like Jeremy, Hamley, reportedly law sponsors, but now the controversy is escalating because Philip Defranco is being sort of targeted here now I don't want to inspire toil. But what you're seeing on this on my screen right now is a story from the New York Times where

you can see a bunch of different view toolbars. Now I want to make sure I point out. You have some into fuels Milton Friedman. You have Jenny Camel, for instance, being associated with Youtube. Just you two right now, but you notice felt the Franco now. Why does this other Philip De Franco and many other you tubers, and why would I consider this an attack on Youtube? Certainly, me, camel, is resilient, he's fine, some of the other actual war not far right or all right, don't care about you too. But what do you think happens then? When you scroll down on this story, as I scroll down it says. First, Caleb came as a college drop out looking for direction. He turned to Youtube. We scrap down and many images started disappear. Soon he was pulled into a far right universe, watching Thoust the videos filled with conspiracy theories, massage any and racism

you'll notice now that only a few channels but half the channels remain, of which yes, Philip the Franco, Alex Jones LAW. Southern Milo, you novelist, Jordan, Petersen and govern Mcguinness, others etc. But, yes, there's felt the Franco and then finally, many of the creators disappear and it says I was brainwashed and Philip defrauding cut with a last image on my screen. So yes, Phil is naturally upset about this. I was brainwashed vote last thing, so the implication here, scroll CUP and watch them all reappear its talking about how this guy watch Youtube and went down the rabbit hole radicalization. This is a lie on absolute lie, produced by the media. It is a typical the results are talking about. Therefore leading edge cases, specific users who did specific things and chose to wash his content and claiming that Youtube as a whole. Does this factually

true? I have done numerous videos explaining how they're lying, I believe, they're lying for one reason: Youtube takes away their money Youtube takes away their traffic. So why would they insinuate that Philip, the Franco, overhear milk, toast fat centre right, like myself, actually is he's more moreover, a middle ground like commentator than I am. I am much more activity. I've no problem talking about free speech in these things, But felt a frank was by no means a political actor in the culture were so why, then, as you as they imply this, I was being radicalized you scroll down his face is the last thing you see when it says I was brainwashed. Why would they do that? Now I want to lecture. I stress it appears that system they're using, as is always the same, I think, fell posted photos that showed a different kind of breakdown, as you scroll down different images will appear, here, but when I opened the story just now, this is what I saw. What are you

things going to happen. Then, when people read this story- and it said, As I went down the radical. I was brainwashed and the last you see in terms of brainwashing is felt the Franco I've leave. This is designed intentionally. Look, you can call it negligence or you can call it intentional. We also can see that was wrought. David Reuben is here what they're trying to do. In my opinion, whether was intentional or not it's a common tactic. We see from activists what they would they have here in. This it is now you can reasonably say Philip. The Franco is a has been associated with the alt right that sought. So what what? What years? When it wouldn't? Let me break down the actors before you read through a lot of the comments from different people and and what happened here and another defending it, naturally felt the Franco's upset, but I believe this is an overt attack on you tubers on purpose.

Kevin Ruth. I have worked with at fusion. I believe his motives to be malicious. I believe this is intentionally my opinion, because when you actually look at the data, we can see that the greatest radicalization over the past ten years has been news. Websites like the ones. He works at. He was working at fusion, as was I there's other websites, I've Buffy, having imposed Buzzfeed out almost mixing up there, but there's a threat. I talked about but about how the media is radicalizing people, Zat Goldberg, said I spend some time unlocks next over the weekend, depending on your political orientation, yadda yadda, I think we can say wholly effing s. What he found is that terms in news articles such as diversity. Ocean skyrocketed dramatically. I mean we're several orders of magnitude, whiteness race theory, unconscious bias. All of these things exploded around the same time, What's radicalizing people today is digital.

Websites, primarily on Facebook and twitter. So it's really interesting than when you see Cnet Vocs the New York Times blame at Youtube. So I let me try explains avoid move a little bit further on what why they're doing this to fill Facebook and twitter have direct share metrics when you post something You can watch in real time if it is successful or not you tube does not have a direct share function. You cannot watch Youtube. Video and click share and haven't appear to all of your Youtube's Of course you can have an appeal on your main channel, but a people get notified for them. For the most part, what ended up happening is that these terms, you're, seeing made people angry and angry, gets the most shares. I was told this explicitly by marketers for some of you companies. What they found was that social justice content did really well and they made money from it. They were there

watch the shares going up on Facebook in real time. They knew what worked and didn't and they created formulas to chase this narrative it rapidly and dramatically radical. I see people not necessarily to the far left that we do refer to ass, far left very often that we should make this distinction into anti terrorism, the lot but white liberals, because in this regard, what this white liberals are the only group in the vote that I dont know that that was what they show among all racial or racial groups in ethnicities, white liberals are the only group that are negative. Our negative in terms of in group outgrew buys meaning they hate themselves only group its due to this radicalism So then we see journalists providing safe harbour for these fringe identity and activists. Like call us Maza who targeted Stephen crowded first, it was Alex Jones and we all said it will not end there. Now it Stephen prouder

He said it wouldn't and their then seen at smeared several gaming commentary channels, because sometimes they were angry got their ads pulled and sure enough within days now it's Philip Defranco your next. They already took down journalism channels, historical channels podcast, but let me explain to you the goal of this near times article. While it is my opinion that they do this for a reason it may just The accident. I want to make sure that's clear: I'm I'm not sitting you're suggesting that Kevin Ruth is truly his moustache and in some purpose, though, I believe him, because I know I've met him personally and work them on several issues and based on history. You know of of what I did at fusion. Let me just say I believe there is in all likelihood. At least He knows the result of this and is fine with it an at at at. At the very least, I think he knows what he's doing what will likely happened. The future now is that one of these acts

Adam ETA media company will eventually right an article sang Philip, the Franco Comma, who has been associated with the alt right comma, was seen advocate this year without any other they'll. Take something innocuous, an article, you know you to launch a new programme for craters who, like going back lips. They'll then use this as an opportunity to just finally claim he was associated with the outright because guess what he was look at us. I was brainwashed just him and look they put him next. Do they put him next? Alex Jones, Monopolise, seven millennium, etc. He has I've been successfully associate with the outright you'll. Then, you something else happened it at some point on Wikipedia it will say: Filigree Franco has has been quick, felt afraid of critics have aligned him with the all right. As they have, though, he denies this doesn't matter that citation will then be used to say, Philip, the Franco Comma. You know

Socio of the alt and it escalates from their eventually It will just say an outright youtube. Her that's the game they play. Interestingly, in this article, as you actually go down, it's one guy who chose to watch videos, that's it. He chose the thing about Facebook and what vocs and Buzzfeed and having imposed who is they choose to escalate their content watching the shares work? I know because I worked for I work itself. Within some of these companies, I've had marketing professionals say to my face. We know because we do a be testing, we change title we changed sub heads. We change images to see what's working in real time, they'll post a link on Facebook and they'll count. How many shared is getting the past hour and thence. I hope not enough. You tube doesn't have that ability is much harder to radicalized on Youtube. The example I often give-

This proved narrative is how many Superman extremists have you met how many go coup extremists? Have you met me? Skateboarding extremists have you met just because you watch DC comics doesn't mean you will become a fan of Superman. In fact, if you, Google, search superhero, if you go on Youtube and search for superhero, and you see a video about Superman. It's also possible. You come to the test and hate Superman sure every video shows that women doing great things, but you might actually not like him. You tube, cannot determine what is more radical than anything else it is. It is not possible for the most part or extremely unlikely that Youtube created a list of words they deem to be more radical than anything else so think about it. How could you took a term and whether or not you actually like Superman or our critical of Superman? Perhaps you like green lantern, an entry like. I knows. Why seem silly me doing this, but trust me. It's very important somebody.

If we want immigration, you to ban, suggests more videos on immigration. The person has to choose to escalate in whatever should they want, they could easily choose to go and watch. Do me kennel they could easily. Was to go and watched F in. It is the person's choice. You too, doesn't understand the difference between nationalist and globalist they're just words, so so that that's the ultimate point. How many people do know are walking around with Superman costumes trying to fight crime, none because their not being radical, I buy Youtube, Youtube is turning people into extremists it's just showing them more of the same if they choose to click on it, but I assure you when we if the other data we can see. Yes, this is radicalism, inundating people over and over and over again rapidly in a short amount of time, with the same content drives this narrative, the important thing that differentiate you too isn't on. You

you took as an arbitrarily choose to show you unconscious bias. You I will show you things associated with these concepts overtime. So if you watch it remain, you might see X, men, that's it doesn't mean you'll like it and does it mean you'll actually go for it, But when the only thing you see on Facebook is what's perfect, perfectly created to drive to buy shares to be sent. Do you, you will only see this. You will only see these videos and it will radicalized you. Let me clarify you too can radicalized people of Youtube and the potential for people to watch these videos, but on Facebook your feed only has so much in an at a time twitter as the same problem. Facebook. Your feed only has so much in it at a time twitter as the same problem and because they can track the real time sharing metrics of this content. They know what works and doesn't to get more views. It happened so rapidly.

This is why I believe they're targeting Youtube. They know they are the threat and you tubers are challenging them. Us go back to fill the Franco. Roquat can talk about you Doktor, Frank Franco is a rather neutral commentator. He does you does Paul. Excuse you said before is a journalist I pushed back. I believe he is he researchers story and tries to prevent the information without bias. That is journalism is the best. I'm not gonna, say that, but I think he does a good job. I like its content. This is one of the reasons that the target him and associate him with the all right, because Youtube is not radicalizing. People watching Philip, the Franco does not guarantee You will then watch some fringe extremist. Furthermore, shown the data over and over again, Youtube is more likely to recommend the left wing content as opposed to right wing content. That's just a fact: but let's let let me tell me, I want to show you a few more things before we before we carry on. I think I've been my point to a certain agree, but he talks about how.

This guy eventually are choosing to watch ass, J, W videos and global warming stuff. He also why many videos by members of the so called intellectual dark web like Joe Rogan and Dave Reuben during TWAIN, nineteen, he began watching more left wing channels. The point is Want to associate you with the worst of the worst one of the things that keen stars brought up that accommodate I'm a past video on my second channel was that independence are being forced to side with conservatives, but but also they want this to happen. Now now- and now I will say I didn't actually get into that the comments from fell. So let's go through this really quickly. This Re emerge when Phil tweeted this earlier today, hey near times what the hell is this and he shows several images where you can see as use it starts with Phelan and others and overtime. It removes other people. Until its talking about brainwashing and fill is one of the last people. That's literally what I got

so I mean I understand that the system is. Is it a, but for me for it was the last one. This I can't imagine that the potential for this was accidental. Kevin Ruth responded by saying, since I'm getting questions about it. The collage up top is just a cent the sample of stills from Keynes, viewing history somewhere far right some art. I assure you, and this man's viewing history. You will find the young Turks. I would be absolutely shocked if that wasn't the case. Philip Defranco is just a mainstream. The profile youtube or so what they're doing is they ve chosen Phil on purpose? They chosen him on purpose. Well, Linz Defranco, I believe, Fells wife, said, imagine being so bad at your job. That you'd think it's accurate to include Philly DE thumbnail as an example of far right videos full of conspiracy theories, massage indian racism

and maybe let's say for a second but Kevin Ruth- knows that felicity isn't even remotely outright but included him for clicks and attention that that is just as bad because it plays into the desperate culture of inaccurate click bait journalism. That is altering the realities of millions of people who don't care to read. The actual articles I understand what characterises getting at with the article itself, but come on due to be better. How long do you want come on how long until Wikipedia says filled the Franco is all rights, only just over a few more comments that were made in then won't work will take off on this one. So Having responded, saying it's a sample of his viewing history, some far right up some not fill responded. Then please speak with your graphics department, because this slow, The disappearing thumbnail collage with escalating language seems to insinuate a lot. You know how many people, scam or just read headlines the goal here when they do things like this is legally protected, insinuation. The New York Times, never said Phil was all right now

just an image. It isn't. We never said that. But now you can absolutely claim, doesn't association and that's an opinion, but from there you can continue to escalate until in it you're from now they will say filled. The Franco is all right, and I tell you this now: I'm a warning to people like fell and others felt. The Franco's backlogs is full of juvenile videos where he makes off color comments. I dont think any of it is particularly offensive, but you can easily clip small sections and pull out of context clips like they do, for everybody and and shall a college of film Franco, saying outrageous things and sates proof. So I do have this comment from came star who said there is an all out war against you too, by the media. It's time to educate advertisers team has tweeted in the path the other day that he's been talking to some top you tubers to go after the advertisers. The war is coming. I'm sorry, the war

here Stephen Cotter was not the first when they came for Alex Jones Peoples. I gather its joneses, and you know, directing people in, and harassment and fake news now the comforts even prouder, he said mean words, Then they came for gamers simply for being angry. Now, it's Philip the Franco its begun, this absolutely as an attack on his business and its character, and it will not end here. You worry or to believe I will end here and I'm going to show one more comment, because I It shows how far this has gotten Amanda the Jedi. You may not know she is. She has a smaller youtube her she plays video games on the internet. When I saw keen start tweeting about this, But it was very crazy that somebody who's just Youtube culture was was stepping up in saying this is going too far Under the judge I, who is a smaller Youtube or who makes commentary, videos on movies and Spiderman applies video games. Who happened to watch full disclosure. I thought when she came out when she's when she treated this, you can see every

how the hell is the New York Times going to try and put the idea that facility is anything remotely close to all right. This is why people are starting to trust traditional journalists less and less. This may be the most important comment what asked me, because Amanda is not a political actor she's, not a big at Youtube, her. She has a smaller content crater who produces entertainment and gaming commentary being pulled into this because of what they have done to fill the Franco. This shows, in my opinion, that craters whore, typically a political, like came star now being pulled into the fight, but teams are is big right, so he has dealt with a lot of these issues. He did cover the news, but The judge I talks about spider man, Marvel Movies video games. She does comment on some of these things, but this is what happens

that's what we're senior, and I understand that we must respect this. Disrespectful highlighted she's, a smaller crater. I think it's a perfect example of how they radicalized people not to imply that this is radicalization, but you are bringing people who are not political into the political. Against you highlighting the mistrust in journalism, because you target beauty pie because you target Philip defraying

and we know because we're fans they are not crazy people. I want to end with one very, very important thing: these platforms, these companies, Fox, etc. Vague, don't realize they only have reach and there's a difference between reach and influence. You tubers, like felt the Franco, have influence and reach and there's a difference. If vocs writes a story, saying x is bad, some people might read it. Many people might not agree. If King STAR are you two were with influence, says access, bad. His fans say we love. You came the people on Youtube, our friends with their creators, their part of a community there talking to individuals, they send me emails, I can respond olive and I'm sorry, I'm type, because I seriously get hundreds, but I do respond every so often because the people who watch me aren't aren't empty face

who are just reading the newspaper. I don't care about that. The brand their people who care about the individual, their people who like what the individual does and respect the individual. Someone like felt. The Franco is a long standing credible created that people like he has fans who I was content because they trust him. They attacked him. It filled. Comes out and says I dont like this and act as wrong. His fans will very likely say how dare you attack my friend. Do you think people are friends with the New York Times? No, of course not, and that's the difference. If came star, really does, if he's being serious when he says he's talk to these big creators, if you really does come out with other big Youtube and those utopia say from now. We're all boycotting this advertiser because they targeted this Youtube. Her

sounds are gonna, say I'm game. Let's do this because we are friends now, of course thank were literally friends, but the point I want to make, as there is real connection between an individual and the people who watch their content verses, a massive blind cooperation and the small actors have seek to cause damage to the content. We love. They did it with beauty pie and you think preoccupies fans abandoned him, of course them they're gonna. It's when this war goes full steam? It's gonna, be epic I'll leave it there. Let me know its thinking the comments. I got more segments coming up later, the next on Youtube COM slashed him cast news. My second channel is gonna get interesting because the escalation is really it's happening. Really fast. I'll see you in the next story.