Before we get into the story, I want you to do something for me. Imagine a field, a field full of horses. The horses aren't standing up there, all ng down it's because these horses are no longer alive and in this field is in army of journalists beating those dead horses relentlessly, and that's how I felt a couple days ago when I did the video about calling out the b s- and you know politics- and I made a kind of follow up yesterday and that's how I feel I feel like the media. They've said what needs to be said. They've talked about all of these policy positions. They've talked about Trump in the scandals, and now they just keep doing the same thing and the final straw. For me, what is Ukraine gate. Now, there's a big scandal with Trump in Ukraine, which I hate talking about. It is literally Russia Gate to Ukrainian Boogaloo. Well, what happens when there is literally nothing but a field of dead horses. You, I hope you guys understand the the idiom being that horse right when, when you're like

literally doing nothing by the horse is already dead, get it well, it's only one thing you can do, make it up and there have been some overt is that are outright fake and they've been called out. Those are rare. I've been a lot of corrections, there's a lot of media. What they'll do is they'll jump, the gun on the story and just a like people, familiar with the president's thinking have said, or they'll say, like you know, the other day with the fake AOC Supporter Rally and saying all that nonsense? They say like. Oh someone claimed it was them. Therefore, it's true now granted in that case you know they get lucky. They roll the dice. Eventually, they found more evidence to back up their claim that the media does this. They jumped on story and boy have. I said a lot lately, two four twenty four hours later attraction but other times is being slammed because they published a fake discussions like a fake interview. Well, maybe maybe under the wrong word, but that's the best. I can put it it's a it's. A

fake conversation and imagined conversation with flyover. Man fly over man to the best of my abilities would be better. Reid as strong man, a trump supporter. Those are from it with, I think You know it's straw, man means, but just to be fair. It's basically New York Times is setting up a man made of straw with a Trump Pat, the manga hat, and then they and lightly tapped to knock it over and say, we've won. This story is ridiculous, but it's indicative of a bigger problem with the media. They've lost touch with reality and I'm gonna go through and and break down exactly why. I believe that to be the case in the New York Times has been in a really weird place. Publishing the Kavanaugh story they did was was bunk. The book didn't sell like this is crazy, so number the whole controversy, where linear time spot the story saying there's a new accusation against Cavanagh. It's just not true. There's no corroborating corroborating evidence and it was all to promote this book and the women who wrote the book with all these shows it's not sound. Apparently it's sold like a couple thousand copies flop, hard flop.

Media is lost, touch with reality and in in the as I've mentioned. Many times for the Democrats chase after them, so here's what I'd like to do go to some stores. I want to start with just lightly, into the problems of the New York Times, flyover man story, which is now getting flak from every the criticism. Being you know, look they've run out of things to talk about. I I genuinely believe that. Yeah. What what okay? How many times can I say how many times can I say it's in saying the Democrats proposed giving non citizens healthcare we we set it it's been said, don't need to say it again. How many times do I need to say that impeachment is unpopular in in a back fire even Van Jones? Now it's saying on CNN, it's a lose lose for Democrats and like we get it, we get it. I mean, I understand not. Everybody watches every single video and knows every single thing, but at a certain point you just got hey man. Let's write a human interest piece about a bake, a piece about a bakeries, new flavor of cookie right. Let's

talk about something else. Well, the New York Times decided we're going to stick with politics, but we're gonna make it up as long as we tell people it's imagined in, first place it's it's just so silly to me. So so, let's read a little bit before we get started head over to TIM, cast dot com, slash! Don't! If you'd like to support my work, there's multiple ways: you can do it! You can check that out but the best thing you can do share this video, and I I I really do mean that I I have. I have frequently done tests on whether you know when I promote hey. I asked people to versus when I don't and seriously Youtube. My second get my hard rank this channels actually been doing better. I don't know what that means, but I I know that when you guys really share it has a seriously positive impact. So I really do appreciate the best thing you can do. Let's read the New York Times David Brooks writes why Trump voters stick with him and imagine the conversation with flyover man and the first thing. The first thing they do

a set up, the strongman, implying that Trump supporters really do think Trump is completely corrupt and that it's okay, because at least the crop guys working for them. It's it's a strong and it's just not the case. I know because I've talked to Trump supporters. I talk to them regularly and I talk to people who don't like the president fairly regularly urban guy says. I hope you read through our I read the rough transcript of that Trump phone call with ukrainian President Trump clearly used public power to ask a foreign leader to dig up dirt on his political opponents. This is impeachable. I don't see how you can deny facts in front of your face fake point made by fake urban guide. Fake fly over man says I haven't really had time to look into it. Are you kidding me is that the first thing say I assure you, Trump supporters are paying attention to this first problem the

function that Trump supporters don't care and don't pay attention is the opposite of what I have experienced. Listen there are people on the right who don't pay attention, one percent, thereby who just don't believe the report when it comes out, I get it. There are people on the left, who also do the exact same thing. It's a silly game, but in my experience what I found is that most people, I know who are voting for Bernie or Democrat, don't know anything about this. I'd be willing to bet a substantial sum of money that if you gave me ten anti trump people and ten Trump people, the tantrum people would be closer to accurate and the anti Trump people, not that they would be completely accurate, just slightly closer and and and in that capacity I mean. If I go to a Trump supporter and say, did you read the transcript? They'll, probably be alike. I I glanced through it. If I go to some,

unlike Trump will be, like I heard Adam Schiff you should I mean that that that there is a genuine gap and the the the independent individuals sorting through of news. Okay, you look at the narrative from independent commentary and it's typically a balance between moderate and conservative me being more mom and you have more conservative channels. You know Stephen products that are up and my commentary is like. Usually he I'm not a fan of Trump, the Republicans and a lot of things he's doing it. You know it we, I I don't need to get into that, because the media does a million times per day, but you look at the main stream media CNN and even to an extent Fox news, and you will see that generic typically uninformed opinion or Miss framed bias against the present. I think this is because the media is desperate for money so that that's kind of the main point

right. He says the big picture is we knew this guy was a snake whoa full stop. I don't know very many trump supporters would call trump a snake. I've talked to many people voted for the President, who said they don't like his attitude, then like his character, but I believe that things you have a Trump supporters is that they don't think Trump is a snake they think is actually fighting on their behalf. This is creating the fake narrative that Trump's base are uninformed people who think he's corrupt, but don't care because our kids are in trouble and one shot, and I made a deal with the devil. Well, I'm not going to read through this. You get the point in the end, the New York Times columnist, David Brooks, is more locked for creating imaginary fly over man Trump supporter, but it's not just that he's getting mocked for urban guy too, because he created a caricature of both people. This is the point I'm making the New York Times

scraping the bottom of the barrel. It's it's an analogy. I truly love their scraping so hard. The bottom that they're pulling up wood shavings- that's not NG left, there's literally made up a conversation; it is the driest it is the most it is it is. It is absolutely ridiculous. Well, it's not the most ridiculous thing: we've I mean we've seen free speech is killing us by the New York Times. Wow, Bravo opinion section what an excellent statement nobody agrees with. Well, I shouldn't say nobody 'cause a lot of people do, but in this story they say that the blue checks of twitter attacked in New York Times columnist, David Brooks for his latest column, attempting to explain how a trump voter in Middle Middle America views the president's potential impeachment. We get the point now the New York Times is being dragged across the coals because yeah they kind of just made up a fake story, and one of my favorite criticisms was that the New York Times is paying David David Brooks

ungodly sums of money to just make things up. Yeah! Congratulations! Well, let's get! Let's get real one of the most dangerous things. That's happening in this country is a complete fracture from reality, and this is what I talked about yesterday. My second channel, you may have have not seen it, but I mentioned how we had one story. That said, we have a record of Connie and then you go to VOX and they say it's bad news for the president, and I say how do you go for record breaking economy, fifty year, low unemployment and say it's bad news well, because this month it was sixteen thousand less jobs created, so it's a slow down in the slowdown is bad. Therefore, this is bad news for Trump and I'm like dude. That is scraping the bottom of the barrel and pulling up shavings like come on you're stretching things now I don't think I'm perfect. I think there have been instances where I've probably done something similar. My analysis has probably been bad and many people might assume that when I say something like Trump is going to win two thousand and twenty, then I'm just

saying that my black timbs only saying that to pander to Trump supporters. I don't care, I think, you'd be nuts to think Trump is going to lose and the big reasons. As the analogy I gave you at the beginning of this video. The media has said what can be said. Think about the Democrats. Actually, those are really great. It said this. Can anyone name anything from the third debate now, like you? Can you repeat any quote: was there anything said that was memorable? It anyway? No nothing happened and no one cared, and that was really interesting to me because yeah I can't I I sat there. I think I was planning on my phone for the most part like yeah. I just it's been so How many times do I need to hear Bernie say Medicare for all how many times do need to it because the media repeat the same talking point five billion times. Sears is interesting. We are an unprecedented era. This level of information overload wasn't even at like it's escalating right into

sixteen. We were saying one of the first times a day. Democratization of our politics and speech was going have an impact on the presidency. Technically Obama was Obama used Facebook to rally people, but at the time it was still young. We are now in the the the most intense we've ever seen, and it's only going to get more. Intense information overload. Here's the thing ten fifteen years ago They would say that somebody would go up on stage to debate and say I want to do this and then the conversation around that could only be broken up over a few months, because you have an article written in the paper and appear in the paper appear on the website. And then, a few days later, you see like an update, a rebuttal today, it's instant nonstop and it's every second of every day, Bernie Sanders on stage when he says we're going to give healthcare to non citizens. You already have eight Eight million rebuttals instantly on twitter. So we've all heard.

It's all been said. The negotiating is stopped. What more is going to happen? You're not going to convince anybody, we're we're seeing it it's it's! The democratization of information. The internet has allowed this a lot of channels like mine to exist my opinions, and so we are now trying to wish struggling. How to figure out so how do we quantify what someone is left I up down whatever there slamming bill Maher right now is a phony liberal, there's an article and I think I'll read that later later dates around six hundred pm, but they don't know it used to be that everyone had a little bit. They shared, but it's a great What, but because of the internet, we can all rally around specific concepts, and thus you end up with very specific sex or sections of various tribes and kind of breaks down. There's, some overlap and it's getting weird, I'm clearly not a conservative, but I don't like the Democrats for the most part I like Yang and Tulsi there. Ok, Mary Ann.

Pretty much, I think mainly into this kind of a sweetheart, but I don't agree with a lot of our policy ideas. I think she's nice and I think it's me with the media duster, but I clearly don't fit in and so we've called politically homes, but the reality is that that the people like Ruben or our project for Tassie or sorry, I can pronounce your name as far wrong and me don't really fit in any place. But we all. We still are kind of moderate centrist liberals, and so you know, look the people who believe believe we exist. We have, we form our own space. So yes, the show in terms of the media, because a lot that you all make a long video we'll see what happens. The New York Times knows that they have to play this game. They have to set up a strong and they have make trump look bad, cancel and whitey trends, as Americans slammed the New York Times for outing Trump whistle blower as CIA officer. The reality is when your time's did lose subscribers in the wake of the whistle blower story controversy, so the New York Times knows that have a very urban demographic. Thus urban guy is the Smart one saying we

Trump did wrong, and the question arises about this fake story. Why can't the New York Times just a Trump supporter to write an article. Isn't that complicated? You want to hear an argument from somebody as to why they defend Trump. It's great. I can in name us several people off the on top of my head, who are trump supporters of large followings and would gladly write you an article explaining what they think and why they think instead what they do. Is they take urban guy who clearly knows of the wrongdoing and they create a straw man of this Trump guy who, always Trump is also the devil in doing wrong, but it's gonna vote for him. Anyway, is literally not the argument, but the media does this because I know, they'll lose subscribers in my opinion, if they don't actually, if, if they don't play to the audience they've and it's weird how scared they are of twitter. It's weird right, but you know when you cultivate an audience, don't be surprised when you do real journalism and

those people there's a couple other stories. I don't own a highlight right following this controversy and and this the subscriber loss they quietly review. All that controversial Sarah Jong's I'll get a total board. The reason this is significant is because it was, she was removed after she stated. The New York Times really does take a look at their subscriptions and that impacts whether or not they think they've done wrong. That's a really interesting you may now I will stress she was apparently removed from the editorial Board or quit she still contractor there. I'm. I don't believe she was fired, not case she left in August, but the but the reason I like this because the point she made as someone at the New York Times, he said straight up when the New York Times see you

for a loss, they take action. What this says to me is exactly what we heard from the creators of South Park. He said this right here. I love this. I feel bad for television critics and cultural critics planes. They may have laughed like hell at Dave, Chapelle and then they went home and they know that they have to write to keep. They know what they have the right to keep their job. So when I read tv reviews or cultural cultural reviews. I think of someone in prison. Writing I think about somebody running a hostage note. This is not what they think. This is what they have to do to keep their job in a social media world. So I don't hold it against a well. Tell you what I don't I I I I literally don't now there is a reality that some opinions are more safe than others. It just so happens that I happen to be. You know a moderate centrist, leaning to the left, and so most of my opinions are acceptable in the Overton Window and they're. A lot of people with opinions are unacceptable to be purged from Youtube, but in

and I can freely express my opinion and tell whoever I want you know I can call them for the most part, I want. I can't swear and stuff I've never been a big swear in the first place, but but but I can do that, I can freely talk about these things. I can say Joker was a great movie and I don't have to worry I woke outrage we're now seeing that the you know in this thread of of of criticism about why all of these media companies follow this one. The important thing you need to understand is the is the overlap of a cultural, the political we've seen. People say that you know the personal is political and what you do they're, really trying to make sure that no matter what happens, everything is about politics to an extent. I will always off reflect and say I know I understand I play this. You know in in an extent, to an extent too, I tried to be above and beyond. But of course, I'm not perfect right, but we can see this and how the reviews

Joker have turned many left. Wing outlets are criticizing it, and this was following a statement where Phillips the director of Joker sad it's because of this outrage putting, but he said something important and I don't, and it's not so much about the Joker was it twenty said dot. I don't want to offend you, it's hard to argue with thirty million people on Twitter. Let's wrote this back to the political realm and and see the overlap between the cultural, the political. What happens when Twitter, which is a french faction of the friends laughed and not the majority of people, will cancel you. If you don't tell the line the media tells the line and the politicians follow right after thinking it's pop,

it is not popular. We know this from polls. We know that impeachment is not popular. We know that there was a there was a study put out by the New York Times. They did a survey in experimental survey where they had a control group that read random information in a control group that read information about how the Democrats are pushing far left and immediately. They lost the moderates. So what ends up happening is the twitter outrage emerges, and you end up with this- the New York Times trying to cater, to this base. First, we see this story about urban guy. Knowing Trump is bad in its frame in this ridiculous way, when the New York Times could have simply hide a trump supporter. It's not surprised on this, I'm not surprised, then the New York Times would actually publish this free each is killing us. They say it's the most absurd and obnoxious argument of ever heard, but think about what happens. Then, with the breakdown with the canceling subscriptions the loss of revenue, we can see how the media, because-

to fail, notably in this story. They hilariously refer to section two thirty of the digital millennium. Copyright act, which is not a thing where the New York Times fact checkers. It seems like they really are collapsing, like they're, losing what made them a great institution of of knowledge and for and it may be- because dwindling revenues- I don't know- I think it might be- because they are scraping the bottom of the barrel. They know that they have to cater to this new audience, they've built and the audience of twitter, which holds hostage, so they bring in speakers with insane opinions that are not popular and they don't and this person, please don't do talking about the story. Actually refers to a law that does not exist a mishmash of random ideas. That was just absolutely incorrect, and I have I have personal experience of this author that the writer of this piece doing the same thing to

he took two ideas: DMCA, which is something totally different, and the communications decency, act and and mashed them together, made mistake. How does this article this is? The only formed person end up writing an insane article that says free speech is killing US This first line being there has never been a bright line between word and deed. It's one of the most insane thing, I've ever heard, but it lines up with Twitter, the twitter mob. That truly believes we should censor the speech and things of and and things like, this ends up in the New York Times. Twitter is dictating all of this, but it is a fringe minority. Now I love the service out how Fox NEWS twisted the Cavanaugh scandal into wait to attack the New York Times, because the capital scandal was a New York Times, failing to include a cabbie out that the woman who allegedly experience on the at the hands of Cavanaugh. One two three four

says she has no recollection of that event at all and they added the correction later all of a sudden, now VOX playing the same game know they have to play the trope to defend you know the accusations or whatever claims Fox NEWS called a correction. I'm sorry in an interview with the hill, the authors called the update a correction well, and we can. We can still see that is not always bad CNN New York Times botched Kavanaugh story. The in a series of blunders from the opinion section. So at least you can still see the sea CNN calling out these these these bigger stories and and calling out the New York Times for that for the for the problems they make now out west wrapping up right. I think I think the main points about the New York time. Ms Publishing, the fake stories. It's only going to get worse. I, like the analogy of I, really do- love scraping wood shavings off the bottom of the barrel,

watching a hole in it and then you know the barrel anymore. There's nothing left, there's nothing there. I don't know where we go from here. I really don't. I talked about it three times. You know two days ago yesterday and today, because every day I read the news- and I read these stories- I'm just like dude- I get it man at a certain point I feel like who wants to hear me say the same thing for the 50th time. You know some people said that I get repetitive and videos. I understand sometimes I'll reiterate things to try and connect points, but I mean- It's actually fair when you look at the the press as a whole, and I look at my my you. And I'm like I did this video last week- oh my already here again and it's not because I thought of it. It's I'm reading the news and reading the same recycled nonsense over and over again. The New York Times Cavanaugh Book bombs, three thousand one twenty sold Amazon rank six thousand seven hundred ninety five. My understanding is that the Mollie Hemingway book out of the Federalist actually did extremely well.

But I want to tell you why I think this happened. How many times do we need to hear the same thing? I think the answer is not very many twice is enough, but the capital story is a year old. The story and it was- was actually old. It's the same thing over and over again, it's like this, the original left. That's why I said Russia Gate to Ukrainian Boogaloo. Do I I really want to hear about these hearings. Do I really want to hear these subpoenas been there done that and I'm over it? I do not need to say the same thing to you that I said last time. It's the same thing? It reminds me of in a video game right. I don't know how many of you play video games, but you know how like there will be one bad guy and it's like I'm level, one you'll encounter a bad guy and then at level ten, it's the same bad guy, but green, ah and this delineates. You know that the green version is tougher. All games do this right. You know Mario you've got the green Coopers and the Red

by the same animation, slightly different color, slightly different behavior, different stats, and that's what I feel like we're seeing all of these scandals. All these talking points are just to them. Reducing exact same thing. It is interesting. I don't know how the debates continue to function. That's why trump wins. I think one of the reasons from whence I I I don't. ACT like one reason he does, but you think about what trump does when he says to Hillary. You know you'd be in jail, he's bringing some in new and exciting to the states, something that feels more visceral on. It feels more real. It's the same, for you too, then why people watch my content as many researchers have stated it's more so a personal connection. You know that I'll read a lot of your comments. I can't read all of 'em 'cause. There's thousands and you know, oh, that, like it feels more like I'm talking to you directly Youtube is very much more personal space relative to the stodgy script. Writing that is Fox news like I have no script literally, nothing. This is off the top of my head. I never write anything down. I just pulled this.

Race, I think about things and then I ran, and that has something more visceral, and I think that is the big change. So when you see a book about Kavanaugh you're like I don't care, I really don't. He buys it in the and expects to see more of the same. I'm actually can I do my best to avoid a lot of the stories that are being chased after 'cause. Here, I'll be honest, as we start entering political season, I thought it would be important to break down the biggest stories of the day and that's why a lot of my videos are specifically about Ukraine impeachment in the past several days and before that with the Democrats are doing, but I kind of felt like you're going to get the narrative from the laughter. Can I get the narrative from the right, and I want to give you my personal, my personal, take on it, which is probably not going to allow a lot of Democrats cuz, I kind of lost it.

Eventually get to a point where, as they just don't have anything left to say, I end up repeating myself as well and after like the third time I was like I'm done, I'm done! I'm not going to do this so I'll leave you with that I'll leave you with that and the New York Times in an effort to just make. Thank just made it up because there's nothing else to say, and I don't know what to expect you know, they're talking about subpoenas on a subpoena president they're talking about the scandals and I'm just like dude. I get it it's just a repeat of the last several years. What can I tell you, no idea I'm going to do better to try and avoid this mess and this nonsense and actually talk about things that I think are important. So I'll leave you there thanks for hanging out stick around next time. It will be coming up at Youtube. Dot com TIM cast news at six hundred pm. I will see you all in the next month. A couple days ago, Bernie Anders was hospitalized in according to his campaign. It was because of some

arterial blockage and he received seizure put in a couple stance. My personal opinion was that they were downplaying a heart attack. Many people said that Bernie had a heart attack, however, Bernie supporter said it was simply and China for those who don't know the difference. First, not a doctor. Here's my general understanding from Wikipedia and China's when you get some are blocked blood flow, but no tissue damage and they can do the same procedure and a heart attack is when the blood flow stops and you get tissue damage that to try to dying because there's no oxygen, Bernie Sanders had a heart attack as the breaking news. This is from yesterday, six pm and let me just stress my complete disgust with the press and politics. Bernie had a heart attack and I I feel for my really do I I I wish him the best I he he seems to be in good spirits. He left the hospital looking better. I wish

no ill will on anybody and I certainly hope he recovers to his false the fourteen of his abilities. I believe, if Bernie Sanders is to lose. This race should be because of his ideas, not because of his heart. That being said, when you get politicians who withhold this information, which is extremely vital to the health of our nation. I am personally offended. We have a right to know if the person wants to be the president suffered a heart attack or not, there's thing, published this story at six pm on a Friday. You know why the stories dead here it Saturday morning this video will probably get not nearly at what will not get nearly as many views as a Tuesday video. What is a fact, as people know this, so they said issue a vague statement, then Friday night, then we'll publish the truth and sure enough when I tweeted about it, I got a hundred retweets.

Well, the the first break in traffic out of three hundred and then the follow up breaking down got like a hundred both of those are low. A breaking story of this magnitude when when Bernie Sanders was first hospitalized, acted about. It got way more thousand or something I don't know, maybe less the point. Is they do this on purpose? This way you know, One want hear that Bernie Sanders had a heart attack I'll, tell you what. I I wanna make sure this is clear. You know that that I want going to be healthy and I I think this doesn't attract arms ideas. But, as I stated, the health of a president is important in my videos. I said: listen people care about whether or not the person is gonna. Be president can speak. You know, with the whole the office for it for the amount of time required, which maybe eight years Bernie Sanders is seventy, eight years old and a heart attack and they're trying to play play this the pr game. This offended me, I know the pr game works. They do press releases on Tuesday when they want you to hear about it and

I don't want, don't do a Friday night, and here it is the which is now breaking and as soon as I can get to a Saturday morning, let's write a little bit. Bernie presenters doctors in the democratic presidential candidate suffered a heart attack on Tuesday the seventy eight year olds campaigns revealed the shocking news a late Friday at the same time that he was discharged in the hospital after under undergoing a successful heart procedure. Now I want to stress if they have the intention of being honest with America, they would have said outright. Senator Sanders, has suffered a heart attack. He's received a procedure. Now they said blockage that is, that is. I just can't stand it. It's all lies the manipulation. Okay, they're, not going to tell you the truth. Do everything in their power to make sure you believe what they want, you to believe so that you vote for them Bernie Sanders knows his campaign knows this is the end. He's

going to lose a lot and they are still trying to lie. I'm just discussed. I cannot stand politics and politicians and the media and they play this game. I'll. Tell you what, if you like my work if you support what I do please consider sharing this lock might might might might I'm angered at they, can't that at his campaign for playing this game now that we can, we and argue it was his doctors who released the information. The Sanders campaign never admitted it. Fine Bernie Sanders had a heart attack and didn't tell the american people, and now I'm gonna debate stage. I'm sure this a big issue. Hopefully this news makes the rounds. Look. I think it's unfortunate that Sanders had a heart attack and it's going to hurt his campaign, but the people have a right to know If you want to be president, you should be forthright immediately. Yes, I'm seventy eight years old, I had a heart attack because that's going to impact how people vote for you when they do the

what they're really saying is it may impact you, but I'm not going to tell you, because I want you to vote for me. They say Sanders was rushed to desert Springs Hospital in LAS Vegas on Tuesday night after complaining of chest discomfort and the Vermont Senator staffers initially stated that he had a blocked artery, which was a lie. Okay, it's technically the truth. I love. I love that the if the best kind of the truth technically yes, a heart attack is a blocked up on a blocked artery and the tissue dies and you rushed to the emergency room or maybe at the merge. But you your rushed to the hospital in a medical emergency for a medical procedure to try and save your heart, but twenty twenty contender subsequently underwent a medical procedure to have two stents inserted into his chest. I have heard just I I I I don't have sore a source pulled up my for there's a little bit more than just the stance, but I don't know if that means

at the same time as as as campaign staff updated. The public as medical diagnosis, Sanders left a LAS Vegas Hospital following a three night stay, and you know they did by putting out this vague and technical information. They sparked a political debate among people over over whether or not he had in China or heart attack. It was just chest discomfort and he went for a checkup, and it turns out he had a he had some arterial blockage, no get a very serious heart attack and was rushed to the hospital. The bar, popular politician was accompanied by his wife, Jane and a couple wave to supporters outside of facility. Appearing in high spirits standards even raised his arm to give a defiant fist pump to me a clear all that he is not bowing out of the democratic primary battle. Well, you know what all up I'll put it this way I don't think he should have based on the heart attack, but I do think you should have now because-

who is unwilling to be honest, the american people, and, let me just clarify 'cause all the standard support- is going to come out and be like that's not fair to him. Listen. I know how the game works my night. Release of the information is on purpose, so you don't know about it. At the very least, they could have said Tanner Sanders suffered a heart attack, but they don't want to because they were, they would rather win. It's it's more point that they win and they get. Power. Then you decide whether or not a seventy a man with a heart attack should be our president. You see the point. I don't think that should should hurt his arguments, but we have to recognize. We have a, top of presidents who are retirees. I I mean just respect to Paul older people, but the point is I certain a certain age we have to recognize. There is a great risk to our nation and well being I

a bunch of candidates were in their 70s. That includes Donald Trump. That, however, Trump is the incumbent. So it's it's kind of like what you got. No, I Joe Biden Bernie Sanders now come on man. You know we've got more younger who are running even those with war is a little too old. Okay, in my opinion, I don't I don't know what what what else you can do. I told the guy parts- thirty eight, they say in a statement released to coincide with his discharge charging the hospital center declared after two and a half days, the hospital I feel great and after taking a short time off, I look forward to getting back to work. He will now fly back to his home in Burlington Vermont for some downtime before getting back on the campaign trail. So the thing when the story came out some of the doctors on Twitter, whether they're, really doctor Hannah what people are saying their doctor said when you have in China and you get a stent put in it's it's like a through the rest thing and they they play set and then I'd it's it's a you could be. I want one tweet said: you'd be golfing that same day, one is a part

Sanders, a canceling all events for the for the foreseeable future in canceling his ads. I said no way it's a heart attack, it's a heart attack and I I bring this up because I don't think you'll be getting back to work anytime soon. I really don't. I think that, like the a I'll make a heart attack, you know I was reading, it could be a month of downtime. He will now fly back Sanders. Is the oldest candidates vying to take on Donald Trump, a twenty twenty? and is third in the polls behind Joe Biden and Elizabeth Warren Warren is seventy come on man. You know what something is wrong: okay, something is wrong and something is wrong with with in Jack's service and millennials. I get it Kress do have got a. Can you get told to gabbard, you got people to judge, you know even Cory Booker, not that old. But what is going on now, where we're latching onto to these these, these people, who should be retired,

you don't have to retire. If you don't want to, I mean no disrespect for people who are who are older, but but seriously Bernie Sanders just suffered a heart attack. This goes for truck the same as anybody else. The only the only real Argument, I could say in terms of Trump is that he is the incumbent he got elected before was an a seventies now he's in a 70s actually going to look like it's kind of weird Biden. Looks he's in his eighties Warren actually doesn't look like she, seventeen. You know I was. I I'm actually surprised. Yes, but Bernie does look seventy eight I would say in terms of Bernie Invite and I'm sorry man, you know look. I I respect. If you put in a lot of work for this country in times have changed, things have changed, but a lot of work. This country, you've, earned your seat down by the fire. But this point something needs to be said. I I just don't understand it. You know in the end, something is happening where we have there's. Just I don't know it's just so much going on, there's a fractured social base, there's

on the right who, who don't see the world the same way the people on the left and the bass the left can come up with is a bunch of senior citizens, I'm not going to be to be different. Actually, I'm saying that the the leading moderate candidate, Joe Biden, but the next leading candidate behind by our actions, to overtaken by seven year old, Elizabeth Warren and then the third place candidate. Seventy eight year old, Bernie Sanders. This is this. Is it's it's it's incredible. You know I I feel, like people, don't actually care about what the president is supposed to be a The present is supposed to do. The president is the commander in chief of the armed forces and the head of the executive branch. I don't mean that pass laws means they enforce laws. Can you understand this and they can veto things I get at this branch is the point to make is shouldn't. We have someone with military experience who does a policy ideas, but it's always so confusing to me why Bernie Sanders running for president make sense to anybody. Look I get it. Okay, I I like burn

a lot twenty. Sixteen I like a lot of what it fought for, but Bernie Sanders is a policy guy right and and so is Joe Biden- it's always interesting, me how there's like different classes, it's almost like an rpg right. You've got trump who's like a tradesman, a businessman and that's like grounds for why he should be elected. Then you've got military personnel. People like people to judge until she gathered and then have lawmakers and they each bring their own interesting perspective into what makes the most sense. Unsurprising that Tulsi Gabbard wants to end regime change because she's fought in them. That's that's our main goal. Her personal experience, I'm surprised at the policy guys are very big on what laws to be passed and people like Bernie are talking about domestic. You know economic and and health care policy and completely unsurprising that a a businessman like Donald Trump is talking about trade.

Agreements with these other countries. It's really really actually how this plays out. I feel like you could almost be like you could give someone a class like like it's a seriously rpg like military. You know by anyway. You look, I'm going to wrap it up there. I think you get the point I look. I have. I have tremendous respect for Bernie everything is fought for. His live, a long story. Life he's done some incredible things and, like his ideas, are hate his ideas that him as much as any other politician who's fighting for they believe in so long as they you know they they they they act in service of their country to the best of their abilities. I can respect that now. You can argue if Bernie truly loves America find whatever the point is he served. He served his country as a lawmaker for most of his life. It's it's it's time by then Bernie and yes, even Warren. At this point, I just I do not believe they should be running for And again, the only reason I would say yes that Trump is the incumbent like the only way I think Trump like ok, I get it is that he ran before he was innocent

he's at sixty eight. I think our sixty seven sixty eight and now he's. I think seventy two I could be wrong, but is the incumbent, so it's kinda, like you know you get, I'm not gonna. Ask that be like you shouldn't stay. He should step down or something yeah. I I get that but wait. Where is the leadership from young people, where's, the charisma and and and any aid that energy and the ideas like I mentioned. I know we have you told the gap Gabbard into Yang but judge. I understand all that, but they're, not the front runners, so something's happening with young people. Were there looking at these older people like, don't you realize you are inheriting the world? Okay, I don't get it. We have these millennials who have never grown up and there's well being like tell us what to do. Bernie tells him to do, but it's like. No, you go. Do it. You take up the mantle. These people will not be around for much

longer, and I mean that with all due respect, but it's true. This is the way things work at a certain point. You must pick up the weight carried by those who came before. Why are the Democrats supporting people in their 70s as the front? Why find some youthful energy? But perhaps that's the problem I feel like? We really do, need someone who's like late, thirties and youthful exuberant. I hope that in the next debate, We can see Yang or Tulsi, really show us that energy, because you know what you know. I really really hate about the Democrats, and this is what Trump has the it exuberant when when Hillary Clinton says you know, I can't member exactly what you said, but Trump says you'd you'd be in jail. You know that that that off the cup quick when he snapped- and it was like to reality- be like double

everybody's, like whoa, that show Trump, was quick on his feet and made a point. I can't member exactly so. You guys will remember us. The other it'll be all over the comments about what what Hillary said but Tom. The point is you look at the Democrats and they're all very stocky and stodgy, and yes, when I am president, we are going to end or made a medical policy with an executive order. It's like okay caster. I gotta try to act like a bomb or something for battle. Rock often act like a bomb get some good stage and just be a kind of like left wing trump can be like a democrat trump and be like joke joke. Stop. No, I don't hear it man, Joe I I I I I I respect your career, I respect of which what you've done, but please, okay, please. You need to pass the torch out and Booker. Don't give me that you're not Spartacus, move on judge you're reading from a playbook that was like generic and democratic responses. Okay, even toll see, I

I'd like to see. Actually you know I I I I respect tulsi. For being you know a major in the National Guard and for being very stoic and, and, and it is, it is rather stereotypically presidential I'm a try to. I mean that respectfully that you know everyone's trying to pull that in demeanor and and be you know very yes, stand up tall and say: listen is a nation need on not on a. I don't see that I don't care anymore, I'm just so over this. The pop politicking, the posturing, the b s that did do it Bernie had a heart attack. Man be on okay. I want to see I want to see somebody get up on stage and just be honest and say you know, someone be like no. If someone said to meet him. What about that? One time you did this I'd be like yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah yeah. You are a gift that you want you to come at me and say six years ago. You this. You should yeah. I like that you're. I agree. You know, I think we we we.

Need to understand that times change. We need to do better and uh yeah, ok right on great! Well, here's what I want to do right. Let's not talk about what you're upset about someone did in the past they're talking about what bike did in the 80s like. Oh, please do it's all fake! It's the fake usdt, just fake! fake. I just can't stand it. I want someone get up on the stage and just be like yeah. You know, everybody's lives in their their their their minds, and you know we need someone with some reality. This is a fact how's that about him Ok, that's what people think you look at Trump and he's not going to say it he's just going to say it and then you all these people in the Stephen Nate Silver same truck, just confesses, okay, the Democrats Look like they're full of it, and this is a perfect example. Look I'm to hear the news, but I'm glad he's okay, but this is the problem. It should have come out right away and said. Yup I've been working as hard as I possibly can. You know I would have rather heard If Bernie Steam said Bernie's been pushed

sixteen hour days, traveling over the world and fighting for you and unfortunately it caught up with him, but rest assured he will not back down and nothing will stand in his way. I would've been like whoa wow, that's bold! Instead, we get, it was a blockage, don't worry and then a Friday night, so hard attack. Ok, I'm done stick around next time is coming up at one hundred pm. I will you all, then, on camera or to label, is seen discussing how they could go about arresting White house officials. I don't think the most shocking thing ever, but maybe this is just because we're becoming desensitized I mean. Is it crazy, now to see an acting Democrat in say we need to see, police? Perhaps how do we go and arrest them? Where do we hold them? And that to me is kind of scary, but it's not super shocking is that the rhetoric from the squad and people like to lab has been

increasingly off, I just off right. So you see like a Cortez. Does this big tweet, which has the big national scandals? They won't impeach Trump and then, couple weeks later. She's like it's so boring, I am over it. We've got other things to work on and I'm like. Do you have a plan? Do you know what you're doing so now we see this? and I just go yeah yeah come on what else is new, that the squad are crazy? Maybe it is really serious and- and we should take it seriously because think about what actually happened have house Democrats to order Marshalls or police to go in bill? Barr I mean the Doj is not going Trump is the head of the executive branch, it wouldn't happen, but then you're start seeing people on the left say. How do you actually arrest? Those who run the executive branch of Trump can pardon at a federal level like how does this work so this all goes back to subpoenas, and here here's like that that the bigger problem here and I think the big rid of

and I'll have a bigger video for you coming up at four pm is: there's is there's literally no truth anymore, and I know that I know that in politics I should say so. I could tell you something like see that window. If I throw this rock at the window, the window will break, and you can say it likely, Well, it isn't there's a chance. You miss a chance with stronger for the most part we get it rock through window, broken glass, but in politics we have partisan media, an failures to fact check and we don't know who's right and who's wrong. Framing devices when you, when you look at it from the perspective of the Democrats, they say something like we subpoenaed bill. Our and Wilbur ross- they do not comply with subpoenas. Therefore, they are being held in contempt of Congress and that's the big issue here: the story from July,

at the house held a William Barr and what Wilbur Ross in can now criminal contempt, criminal contempt of Congress. Now here's the thing Ross and bar both claim they complied with the subpoena sent and and cooperated, and and so many times about the documents. I'm sorry who do you believe? That's it there's the breakdown. What do you do? While the Democrats are insisting something be done there held in contempt? They must be arrested, but they are saying that they completely complied. Who decides a judge? It doesn't matter because you could actually look at Bill Burr Bill bars. You build for William Barr, submitting thousands of documents and saying see some of the documents and then they'll argue what about other documents and then where's the line who determines, and I suppose this is why we have checks and balances. But I I'm actually concerns to the you know. I'm I'm worried, I find it disconcerting. You know what happens when we reach that level right now they want to MP.

The President man, I am so over that conversation, but you know it'll still still be a glazing over a little bit, it'll it'll it'll get mentioned right. What happens if they actually do? Trump has a civil war, not his direct quote, somebody else, but a civil war, a civil war like a divide to be to be completely clear. What happens? What would happen if you actually saw it long for the personal take away, the attorney general and the Secretary of Commerce, I mean you you're you're, we're actually talking about now. The potential force first the war, and I I'm I'm I'm so sick and tired of this conversation. But I mean look, you want to talk about the culture, war and the fight and the battle over truth and opinion. I get it. We can talk about that. That's kind of a cold civil war, but right now we're entering the territory of a congresswoman saying you know

limit limit. Let me read this. Actually. This is the first time we've ever had a situation like this. She said so they're trying to figure out no joke is that the DC police that goes and gets them. We don't know where do we hold them? What do you think happened when this cold civil war escalated to the point where they're actually arresting White House officials yeah you're, going to see the last say good? I never see the right say. Oh my god, this is super. Corrupt they've done nothing wrong. We are at the what the door right now. This is the door. This is this. Is the Democrats again. I want to stress when I said that it's not shocking it's because they always say insane things, but I think we need to get real and the shocking things they say will eventually find their way to reality. Alexandria, Sanrio, Cortez, sitting on her bed on an Instagram live talk about concentration camps on the border. That culminated

in a man showing up with with firebombs and a ghost a fifteen, and he died like that. That happened and his rhetoric, in his manifesto that he released, I I should admit letter it wasn't. A big Medifast was like a three page letter, something maybe is bigger than that, so maybe maybe was manifest on, but he parroted her remarks. He looked to her like a leader, I'm not blaming, because our test for the actions of a lunatic she's entire tort entitled to her opinion, she's allowed to broadcast them and, of course we understand that it leads. You know it could lead to this position. It'll never be her fault She will always be allowed to have opinions it. You know our NIC make sure that's clear what we have to make sure we draw the line between actions and deeds. You're allowed to be done, you're not allowed to act on being Domon going in hurting people. That's on the next yes, but what we're seeing now is where she did slave talking about. You know the arresting of what US officials. Imagine if you would a door in front

us the other side of that door is actual civil war. Let me be clear: the G understanding of a civil war, is when two factions fight over control of one government. Just because we aren't seeing physical conflict doesn't mean we can't technically say we're at the front door right, so we've seen street level conflict between opposing culture, war factions, but now we're seeing an actual fight over control of this government, and it is not through the electoral process. This is where I think we're at the door. Okay. What is that turn into? I don't know, but I assure you, if she's actually entertaining this and they do want to arrest bar and Ross. I assure you the other side of that door is it's close. This is opening that door if they actually take action, they will have stepped through,

and you will now have an actual faction in the culture war, taking direct acts, executive action against the other faction in this cold civil war, whatever that may be, that is a wrecked attempt at taking control or or or at least heard it you know. So so it's hard to know what is that famous shot heard round the world in any kind of circumstance? When we look back to the revolutionary war, there actually isn't one great shot heard round the world. It's a reference. They used to talk about the start of a conflict, but when you're in the weeks,

you don't really know where that conflicts are tonight, and I've talked about this quite a bit that we may look back in fifty years and say it started with Occupy Wall Street. It started in twenty four to it. You know in twenty thirteen or fourteen with gamergate. We are not we're. Not. It may go back just before maybe the economic crisis. We don't know what that great catalyst was where the true shot heard round the world, but I would say in terms of falling off the precipice the point at which we can't turn back what only be them going in a resting spot, a White House officials, so the story says- and I don't read about all of the little context- all right review to Lead- told Detroit constituents at her Congress. Coffee income, recession, event on Tuesday that lawmakers are focused on how best to take cabinet members into custody american rising PAC Tracker caught to live on video speculating what could happen to trump Administration officials held in contempt of Congress, which they've already done. The Congress on

appointed to Secretary of Commerce, Wilbur, Ross and general attorney general, William Barr, who were both held in criminal contempt of Congress for define congressional subpoenas. The house voted two hundred and thirty to one hundred and ninety eight was the second time in U history of sitting Cabinet member was held in criminal contempt of Congress. The first was former ten. Attorney General Eric holder, whom the Republican controlled House held in contempt in twenty twelve after holder, refused to turn over documents pertaining to the operation fast and furious gun. Running scandal delayed told a colleague out set her colleagues are trying to tread carefully in this uncharted territory. I will tell them they can hold all those people right here in Detroit. She joked we'll take care of them and make sure they show up to the committee hearings. This is a line is unprecedented. Never before so again going back to that shot heard round. The world moment it may be, would go back to Eric Holder being held in contempt, but but here's the thing. I think that it's a different scandal. I love how they trying to act like a bomb had no scandal, so please

massive, but I don't believe holder was, was ever arrested or anything like that. I I I genuinely I have. I have a legitimate fear over what comes next and that and that's always what I've you know what I've asked when it comes to these conversations about the cultural war that that the the cold civil, what I'm going to call it? What comes next because Cortez said concentration camps and I I absolutely hold a negative opinion of her saying that, because I do believe you, you have a responsibility, we have a large audience. I believe is a how to say it. It's very complicated- and I don't you know in that. I understand why there are so many people who claim that we have to get a hold on this speech right. They say we know that speech leads to violence and level. Of course does, of course it does. We know that ideas have to exist, and ideas leads to action, that that's that's not and and and and actions lead to ideas. It's it's an it's an inverse. It's just. It's just consequence, just something that happens: hello,

and for me is that she's allowed to do it and I'm not going to blame her because she said something dumb and then someone else went out and took action. She didn't tell them to do it if she did say go do they're person responsible. But what comes next? You say this. Please ask yourself this quest, where she lives, saying this in my opinion, was also extremely irresponsible. She's basically just walked all of us to, door. On the other side, it's faction versus faction, if she's talking about the DC police she's talking about legal executive authority to go after her political rivals, there was criticism over Trump for talking about Hillary Clinton. Now, here's the thing, but the thing about Hillary Clinton in the emails is that what you do with the emails is undeniably a violation of my I I'm she broke the law, I mean you. Can a public official cannot break public record, cannot destroy public record and she did that after she was subpoenaed. She destroyed them in this

and you have an argument over whether not they complied fully. When Ms Out and says Hillary Clinton should be locked up over the email scandal. I look at that and say I mean he's a public official who destroyed public records, smashed phones with hammers. We had that that one guy who was accused of going on Reddit and ask me how to remove her name from emails, because they were really concerned about it. That all sounds like a criminal conspiracy. At the very least, you could argue destroying public records a crime. Maybe she gets thirty days in jail. I mean it may be more severe in that. I believe a largely states, you would no longer be eligible to to hold public office, but that's clear she was subpoenaed. She destroyed records, no matter what the records are, what they were, what the point was. She did. Okay, no action. Take you see. Perhaps it was because there was concern. It would lead to a dramatic escalation, even though she broke the law and that I find deplorable. But in this instance we see that our it.

Let me see if I can find this quote. I don't want to We strongly disagree with any suggestion that apartments have obstructed the investigation. They wrote. Adding other departments have turned over tens of thousands of documents. It is, Fortunate that the house has scheduled a vote to hold two sitting, members of the president's cabinet in contempt of Congress. Given the clear record of cooperation after the vote in the White House Press secretary, Stephanie, Grisham called the ridiculous and Alice House. Democrats know they have no legal right to these documents, but their shameful and cynical politics, no no bounce whatever you can regard every argument. I've made about them doesn't matter, that's my personal opinion. In the end, there is a real and serious consequence to arresting members of of the Trump cabinet and and and and White House, and I think that's when we that that's that's at least a milestone in

or we could call the cultural civil war, the cold civil war and Richard tape is talking about it. This is not the crossing of the line. It's her walking us up to the line and saying we're trying to figure out how to step over this. That worries me that they're actually talking about doing it, but I don't. I don't know it's going to happen. I just know that everything's falling apart, so here's what I'm going to do coming up the next video. I want to talk about the collapse of shared reality. The media, the New York Times published a fake interview with a Trump supporter talk about what's going on and how I believe the Democrats are stuck in this cycle with a media that is lying and desperate and will get into that so go to youtube dot com, Slash TIM cast at four hundred pm, that's where it will be. I will see you all there. There is a massive political problem when it comes to Trans rights issues, and the big problem is that many of the more extreme activists

trans rights have figured out a weaponized, cancel culture and cause career damage to people who work in academia, This is not a a attack or condemnation on the Trans media as a whole is a sin. It is a small group of people and there are many people I Julie, follow and listen to on this point, this is not an opinion that I just want. One day came up with its from watching creators and people who are trans. Who talk about these issues recently, to cite reference you saw we have with Contra points, who is a left wing very popular, very famous you tuber, who was attacked because of comments about nonbinary trans. So the point is the activists actually make it much more difficult for everybody have a conversation about what we should or shouldn't be doing. It's a fact that this video on my channel or at risk simply for for talking about some of these things out and I'll, give you that that The big story now and I'll talk about some of the things arising out of it Sky news reports, hundreds of young trans people seeking help to return to their

channel gender, a woman who d transition in twenty eighteen says there are many people who have had gender reassignment surgery who wish they hadn't and the most alarming things they tends to be females. This Bob particular woman who treated D transition says that many of the people she talks to the most of them are young women who are same sex, attracted who are who transition and then realized. It was incorrect. This this actually lines up a lot with what we've seen from the lesbian community. When they've said that Trans rights activism is erasing lesbianism, now, look I'm not here to tell you who is right or who is wrong. I can only read this story and give you my thoughts, but there's a act. There's been scientific research on things such as rapid onset, gender dysphoria, which we saw predominately targeted young females. Are they tend to be autistic as well? that that study was removed due to outrage from activists, and I want to try to clear it's not even transaction is for the most part. It is the weird French left that will latch on to anything this.

Cancel culture is causing serious harm science. I want to read the story, but I definitely want I something even more alarming from a guardian reporter. This is from all over all over Bergen. He said he says, and we quote: we sought the views of mythologist and clinical trial statisticians, but few were prepared to speak publicly for fear of reprisal. The research didn't provide the NHS with any of the annual progress reports. It requires researchers to submit this has to do with puberty blockers and we're now learning that it's actually it's potentially harmful, and point we're. Seeing for many people is that the people who the stuff are scared to talk about the potential consequences of take this medication because of fear of reprisal as terrifying now. The reason I highlight that moving into the story is that a response, this kind of story there's absolutely bit of backlash. Everyone who dares talk about is being called transphobic and they say that

latching on to the stories of a few fringe individuals to try to discredit the whole movement. So simply by talking about it, I assure you I will face tons of flack and criticism and yeah. Well, I get it. Let's read Sky news reports. Hundreds of young transgender people are sick help to return to their original genders. A woman who is setting up a charity has told Sky NEWS, Charlie Evans, twenty eight was born female, but in as mail for nearly ten years before detransitioning. The number of young people seeking gender transition is at an all time high, but we hear very little if anything about those who may come to regret their decision now, one of the things brought presented. In this argument, is that young women are susceptible to peer pressure and societal pressures. So you take a young woman who happens to be tomboyish or same sex attracted, and you see the the the willingness

of the mainstream society, so you're trans and things like this, and then you end up with confused young people who try to transition. This is what we're saying is I mean every Trans person person is wrong. No, does it mean that Trent children can't be Absolutely not I'm not I'm not saying that you want to bring in an argument about the age at which a child I understand comes. I I said child as in someone under eighteen, okay, you can have an argument. The point is, there are some who are pressured your pressure, or this is pick parental pressure or otherwise that come to regret their decision. Okay, they say there is currently no data to reflect the number who may be unhappy in their new gender or who may opt to do you, transition Their biological, gender, Charlie, Detransition transition went public with her story last year and said she was stunned by the number of people she discovered in a similar position. I'm in communication with

ten, and twenty rolls Quest had full gender reassignment surgery who wish they hadn't and they're dysphoria hasn't been relieved, they don't feel better for it. She says they do. I don't know what their options are now Charlie says she has been contacted by hundreds of people seeking help thirty people alone in her area of Newcastle. I think some of the common characteristics are. They tend to be around their mid 20s there, mostly female, mostly same sex, attracted and often autistic as well. She recalls being approached by a young girl with a beard who hugged her. After giving a public talk. Who explained she was a d transitioned woman too, and now she has a beard for the rest of her life there. There are things you can do, but that's what happens. She said she felt shunned by the LGBT community for being a traitor. So,

I felt I had something to do. Please know launching a charity called the D transition advocacy network with it with their first meeting. Such to be held in Manchester at the end of the month, Sky NEWS wants to meet one person who s Kandi Charlie's network, for help. She does not want to be identified, so we have changed her name. Ruby is now twenty one, but first began identifying as male at thirteen after taking testosterone, her voice got a lot deeper. She grew facial, hair and her body changed. She had been planning to have surgery to remove her breasts in summer. However, in May, Ruby voiced the growing doubts she had been barbering and made the decision to come off testosterone and the transition to identify as female. I didn't think any change was going to be enough. In the end- and I thought it was going to work on changing and I thought it was better to work on changing how I felt about myself, then change.

My body says: Ruby I've seen similarities in the way I experience gender dysphoria in the way. I experience other body image issues. This is a very important point they're absolutely gender dysphoric people. They absolutely can be helped by a confirmation surgery to use the the that Tom in the parlance, and you know therapies to help them. You know whether it's hormone therapy actual mental therapy to help them figure out how to relieve this. Just for you. It's also true that people experience general general body Dysmorphia and you may have people who present similar symptoms to center, just gender dysphoria and then get missed, missed misdiagnosed. I guess look. I don't have all the solution. I don't know what we should or shouldn't do. I do know that, if we're experiencing this now conversation needs to happen, and I also know that anybody who wants to talk about it face a fear of reprisal. Now, look I don't work in academia. I have no boss, my boss is tech.

Likely meet, which means anybody can slame and smear me and say whatever they want fine, whatever. I don't care, but it's been brought up before Jesse Singal in response that tweet from Berkman says remember this it's totally normal and anyone with any qualms about the diagnostic processes surrounding youth, gender dysphoria treatment, treatment for which we have based We know long term outcome. Data is a hardened bigot who Wants trans people dead it yet you go with that see. Jesse has been attacked a lot for bringing up simple points to simple questions and that's what we're seeing now the real ramifications of what happens. When you don't talk about this, we don't have long term studies on this. In fact, there are famous and there's there's an acquittal studies that have proved to backfire much in the same way. So how do you solve this problem? I honestly can't tell you, because I don't know I don't I don't. I don't think I should have the answers. I absolutely don't, because I'm not the smartest person in the world can tell you when we're seeing this. Perhaps we need to calm down, ignore the cancel culture activists have a real conversation.

Ruby explains he also had an eating disorder, but she does not feel that issue was explored in the therapy sessions sessions. She had a when she went to gender identity services. When I was at my gender clinic to get referred for hormones wait, a session where I went over my mental health issues and I told him about my eating disorder and I didn't suggest that that could maybe are connected with my gender dysphoria for everyone who has a dysphoria, whether they're, trans or not. I will thirty more options for us because I think there is a system of saying. Okay, here's, your hormones, here's a surgery off you go. I don't think that's helpful helpful for anyone. There's there's of questions I have, and I and I and I these are legitimate questions- it's often difficult to ask real questions, because any any questioning is considered, blasphemous and and transphobic, but here's my question cons

points talked about binary trans people. You know somebody who who is born male, presents mail and then wants to present as female. But then you have non binary transport. They say that gender is a social construct. If a biological female can be a woman but dress in a three piece suit and play sports and be the ceo company. Traditionally masculine roles and a biological male can put on a gown and dance around traditionally female roles. What is the biological requirement for being male or female? And if you are trance, can't you just be male presenting female trans? There are people on Twitter, our mailing male individuals There's one tweet. I believe it might be a parody, but there are other examples of this where someone will be presenting as totally mail say they send mail, but they are. They are a trans woman who present as male right six thing about this way. A female can wear a suit and be a female and be a woman and

and district. Our mail can wear, dress and be a male's attracted women and be straight. They just will this call cross dressing, but what's the difference, then, if you can have a a trans person who isn't on hormones as a trend, you know where, where where? Where is that quantification? I mean there's a little gym. Jim, a question, because if it's true there that general social construct and that a a a female can wear whatever she wants to still be female, why is it that trans people want to get surgery in the first place if women can be biologically male? I I'm I'm genuinely confused that. I don't see how that overlaps and that's why. I think counterpoints got a lot of trouble for pointing this out. The trans people I've talked to who have transition to female talk about how they believe in binary gender and that's why they want track to transition. But you do have people who look like I do with a beard and market of flowers and say that they are trans. Women who presents male is attracted to women, in which case

general. I generally don't understand. Now I do. I will stress I got it. Is this final point. I got keep this short. They say they now have a record number of referrals and c three thousand two hundred percent more patients in the ten years ago, with an increase for girls up five thousand three hundred and thirty seven percent. This is for the Hs center right. Children they say is under eighteen. That's the point in early. I like this because I have a question: why is it that there are substantially more women going through this than men? Is something happening? That's telling women they. You know there are women more susceptible our feet, more susceptible. I I generally like to ask- and I wonder if it's tied to feminism because were telling women to it, to endorse masculine roles that they should be in the workplace. I should be ceos traditionally masculine, I'm not saying it should be, but as additionally, but we're not seeing a lot of the media telling men too, because traditionally feminine house, husbands and and not working and things like that, in which case I feel like you'll, find young women being told.

Play sports and then, when they do, they're told there be acting like a boy and then when they do they're told it's because they're secretly trends, I think that's that's a potential outcome of, It may be why there are more girls transitioning than boys, make maybe it's biological honestly don't know, but we are seeing this all I can really say. Is people wanted it if people want to be transition, when you have a conversation about it, because it's affecting people's lives, but you know hey, it is what it is. I I fully expecting in trouble on you to for even talking about it. That's the look at the world. We live in five, four three, two one wait for the tweets stick around. I got a couple more segments coming up in a few minutes, and I will see you shortly. No men allowed hotel opens in Spain all this awhile ago, and I'm not surprised. I actually don't think this is news, but I do think it's a great launching off point to talk about gender politics in the western world,

and I I have seen look when you when you travel around a lot. I've used hostels, private room, hostels right me and my friends will share one room with bunk beds. I do not like using open room hostels with with strangers because then you're risking your stuff, though especially if I have to work at it, but there are circumstances where a hostile can be right is the fact that there are male and only dorms- that's not even controversial it's normal. So when I heard about this, no men allowed hotel. I thought who cares? It's not new. This is What they do all really seeing is they're trying to use this as a marketing ploy they they've they've they've, found in NASH. They want to launch a business like I, but we can do this and pushed it, but but they exist

they literally just it's. It's actually law in the US that you're allowed to discriminate based on gender when it comes to renting out your property or all right, finding a roommate you can. If, if, if, if someone's gonna live with you to clarify running a property, you can say no metal out, that's legal women don't have to by law. Live with men is where things start getting really really interesting, though the gender breakdown okay in New York, they recognize thirty one, gender swell the law doesn't state gender, it's, as you know, based on sex or whatever, in which case the new hello updates means you officially can't discriminate based on someone's gender. This is such a thing about this. All will will read the story, but I want to I want to you know, get to the greater context of already talking about it is that let's say you apply for a bedroom on Craigslist and they say arm. You know females only and then you claim you are

and then you claim they discriminate against you. Based on your identity. I wonder that. That's that's public accommodation. I wonder if an exemption in terms of telling a trans person they can't room with you or thinking about, a hotel like this. They say no men allowed. Does that mean no trans men either, and is it mean yes, Trans women is? It is a question that I think need to be Any US, admittedly different than it is in in Europe. The laws are not the same thing ever countries I get it but culturally, we are very similar, so I wonder where they would stand on allowing biological males who identify as female whether they present female or not to stay there, in which case some like back going off the last segment. I did someone like me could say: I'm you know I I present mail, but I am trans. You can't deny. I don't know the law would be in Spain, but for the story, ashour reports, another business has opened up with an anti male gimmick and she nails it. It's a gimmick. It's not that new thing they've been around for awhile, while

a hotel on the spanish Island of Majorca, Majorica may orca, I'm not a process, sorry opened last week, boasting that it is just for women, hoping to quote disconnect from the stress of daily life that offers personalized care tailored to their needs from sometimes website, with bold decoration, inspired by feminine features. This modern fun, channel and unique hotel in Porto Cristo guarantees a truly relaxing vacation on seashore, surrounded by nature. At this hotel you can enjoy the best healthy cuisine made. With zero kilometer products, a wellness area, a pool, free, WI, FI, comfortable rooms, a bar lounge at a unique atmosphere, design, women, a broad range of services and plans designed specifically for a feminine audience that will turn your stay into an unforgettable experience. This is a Spain, spanish, hotel, the articles and UK and the US have similar Trans rights laws. They said women

also said specifically for a feminine audience. So they're not saying female they're, saying women and feminine. That could be a trans woman. I'm is that I'm not saying they would discriminate, I'm curious what their position would be, and then you also under this territory of should what what, if you are biolage bottle female, and you hear this and to you, because the average person would understand this way: no males, no biological maleness, but to anybody who's, who's savvy to the political. You know, culture worn such might assume. This would include Trans individuals, in which case you might for find a male presenting trans woman who demands the right to stay there. In which case are they really offering anything at all if they can't discriminate? I think the Congress actions need to be had if we're gonna work through these issues and come to a point in the future. Where we have resolved them, it is a fact that we aren't we we have the equality act going through. You know truck being pushed by Congress and, if we're gonna get that, through than a conversation, it's we had to figure out where everyone lives and what role comfortable as a site,

of course, whenever you talk about these things, you run the risk of getting in trouble on you too, but I have no problem doing that's. Why I'm doing two videos and wrote about it? Yes, Certainly there all think there. There are all things only women enjoy women aged fourteen and older can check into the hotel for about ninety three dollars a night. It features thirty nine rooms, many of which appear to include a vanity table the only hint this hotel as anything other than about her hotel. Did you know, you can be wild, healthy, fun, beautiful relaxed, adventurous, curious and social all at once. The website asks well no Shelly. I did not know that feminists, hotel Yahoo NEWS reported that some on it may be the first woman only in Spain, but others exist in the world. Okay. So this is literally the point I was making, especially when the hostels at certain living arrangements. It is not unusual to see this. There are other women only hotels elsewhere in the world, such as losing hotel and spa in Saudi Arabia. That's for obvious reasons.

Some travel websites, such as hello booking offers resorts into Turkey and Morocco with women, only pools the other reported, and this brings me to the next point. Have you noticed something they're highlighting specific, specifically Saudi Arabia and Halal booking. What's going on honest question, it seems like there's an overlap between feminists who want a hotel just for women and fundamental abrahamic religion of religious folk, who also aren't women only facilities, there's also a very obvious overlap between the activist like Linda Sarsour, who has said positive things, Sharia law and the feminist movement in this country, I don't quite understand it is an abrahamic religion. I grew up on the left. We were very much mocking the tens of Abraham, I'm not joking. They make parity, making fun of Christianity, Judaism and Islam, and now all of a sudden Christians get

rated on this on social media insulted? But the left at the same time is embracing on another Abraham like religion? I get it they're not the same, but they share the same route. Please I mean no disrespect enlighten me. Help me understand why this is the case. Is it a coincidence that help I'll booking will sir feminists, as well as fundamentalist, religious folk, the mere reported the hotel does employs a man to avoid gender discrimination laws. Yahoo reported that such discriminate endeavors have had problems in the past, such as the twenty seven teen at woman, only music festival in Sweden, which was found guilty of discrimination by the country. You see that's an interesting point swing. You can't make it they couldn't do it another anti male business folded earlier this year after falsely claiming women are paid less than men and charge

young men more than women for the same products handsome her a vegan cafe in Brunswick Melbourne, declared when open that it would charge men. Eighteen percent more to close the alleged gender wage gap, which doesn't exist, and it's also really interesting, because I did a video about, let let let let's let's here we go- we're gonna, we're gonna read at this issue. Thirty year old women with careers are struggling to find men who make as much money as them. So let me ask you this: the gender wage gap and man make less women make less than men for the same same job. It's not true, but if the assuming you think it is, then why do you think it's a problem that women with career the thirties can't find men who make more money than them? I thought all man did you see where we're going with this yeah anyway, the cafe closed early this year? No, there was no indication. The anti male discrimination played a factor. Not businesses go under its normal as faithful readers know. The gender wage gap is because almost entirely by the different choices minimum in their careers,

it is not a measure of how much men are paid versus women in the same job with the same experience, talent, education. One also knows that, if tell were to open boasting that it was for men, only the feminist outrage mob would descend upon it like wolves on cheap. It would be harangued force discrimination rightly so, but such anger is not being given to the women. Only hotel which instead is being celebrated by media outlets and covered in a positive light. Meanwhile, modern outrage: feminists, modern outrage from claim women are oppressed in the civilized world. So, let's, let's side with this, one thought just to give a good kick in the in the butt to this gender, discriminatory hotel. Women are more likely to go to college and graduate a millennial and actually make more money than millennial man, which could be why, when in their thirties, are not finding men to date and that's the last point: women in their thirties are not finding men who make more money than more money than them to date.

If we play off your standard tropes, which I'm not saying, is entirely fair, I'm just saying going off the modern expectations and stereotypes. Society. Women are attracted to men with status confidence. They say conferences, really important and men are attracted to attractive women, women whose bodies are attractive. This is a re for this is that men want to have babies and women need security. What problem arises, then, with modern feminism, if the majority of college graduates are women, if men aren't earning a lot of money, a man will always based on these trucks, be attracted to a beautiful woman. But a woman will not always be attracted to it. Due to a beautiful man is tendencies not absolutes, it could be. The tendency is fifty one, forty nine fifty one percent of women like status and four and fifty one percent of men like beautifully, but I don't think that's true. I think stereotypes emerge as exaggerated patterns. They're, not absolute,

it's it's just someone will notice something and then a stereotype emerges in which is more extreme. The point is uh in the end, I'm I don't want to devolve into a conversation about men and women and you know dating and stuff, so just wrap this up by saying how do we navigate a no men allowed hotel, as ash mentions, we wouldn't well, we we would be outraged if there was a man on the hotel, why the double standard? Well, certainly, isn't equality to allow one friend, but not for men. That's not at the outset of quality. That's discriminating against women by assuming they're weaker than none right framing in perspective. There's no right way to answer this question anyway. I'll leave it there. I thought it was fun whatever I got one more segment coming up in a few minutes, and I will see you all shortly. I I think Bill Maher is great. I, what I used to watch a lot of bad bill Maher, maybe like thirteen years ago. I can't member how long I think I was like eighteen she's been on for a long time. I find the

MAR to be imperfect, but I agree with a lot of what he says I always have them. The criticism about the recession claims, because that is just absurd elitism bill to claim that we should welcome or I'm sorry, that's trump. I'm people, people kill themselves. Lives are destroyed, but for the most part I agree. I find that the segments I've done he does similar segments. In fact, he even cited the same study as me about how white liberals have an out group preference. The only group in the study every when everyone prefers their own family and people and community, except for white liberals who hate white, liberals and white conservatives do for sure Here's the point Bill Maher, is a relatively reasonable. Individual sometimes has bad opinions. That's okay, though, he's willing to bring on people like Miley Annapolis, onto his show and of the conversation now they're coming for him. Here's

our and accuracy in reporting the phony liberalism of Bill Maher. Oh heavens, we know only a matter of time before Bill Maher was called alt right or whatever now he's being called the phone. It also would step one. We are at the door which is now being opened bill in which you will be called conservative, despite everything he doesn't says. Media stilt media still call HBO host a liberal. Why? Yes, because he supports liberals, most liberal positions, he is an atheist. He pushes back on religion, but something changed, and I don't know what or when, but it was solidified with election of Donald Trump, and now that the put the past left and right is fractured and elements of the after the right have emerged on both sides and it's weird, never jumpers joining with voting for Hillary Clinton, occupy Wall Street activists and for me, former Bernie supporters, now voting for Trump.

Don't tell me, but I will tell you this bill Maher you've landed square on the right, just like everybody else who is liberal, who believes in liberal policy positions but pushes back on the fundamentalist in nature. The dogmatic nature of the insane left. It's read, Bear says: Bill Maher rose from being an edgy opinionated comedian, talk show real time with bill. Maher has been on HBO since two thousand and three spending seventeen seasons with over five hundred episodes. Today, real time continues to be one of the most popular shows on cable, drawing in more than four million viewers per episode. I do not believe that strip, maybe with reruns, because I know like the the ratings for the night. It's like he's been he's done like one point, five to two but difficult to one point: five, I guess with reruns though, but hey hey, I'm happy, I'm absolutely excited that bill. Maher can get up on a show and call the

that's crazy. Thank you. We need that. We do. I think the real issue is not the bill. Maher's, a phony liberal, I think, is an actual liberal. I think is an actual liberal. Not I I well, I should say he's what we used to call liberals in this country. People like, I I agree with a ton of what Bill Maher says. I disagree with the elitist portion of it right and I think he does have Tds trump derangement syndrome. That's fine! but I grew up watching his show, and here we are now it was only better time now here's do they can't come out and say Bill Maher is conservative. Bill. Maher has a long and storied history as a liberal it just you can't do that his audience would revolt what they can do, is say. Well I mean he's a phony liberal now entered into your mind that he might not be completely liberal. This is things work. Ok, When it comes to social engineering and- and- and I was stressed, the definition of social engineering typically has to do with human hacking. It's not Changing society as a whole to join individual level when

I want to change someone's opinion of something you have to you can't overcome their reasonable boundaries. So the way explain this, as if I told somebody to you know, eat food off the floor, simple example, they would say no, that's gross. If I, if I guess out right, said it's actually not it's completely healthy, they would say you're nuts because have a reasonable boundary. However, you can inch them to the point where they are sitting on the floor and eating food off the floor. If you do something like you know, have you ever tried yeah, you know eating off the counter. If you clean it right, clean your counter get spotless, and then you have to trust me yeah you, you might actually convince someone to do something small,

not a big change. It's amazing regular place use paper plates. I use a paper towel. This is a paper towel free sandwich get a plate. Even you can even do this hey it's it's it's bad for the environment to work too. Even even you know not a temporary place. I guess I need to calm. Ceramic ought are bad for the environment. It's waste. You should use paper plates right, they can be recycled. Then I switch, but you say, paper plates are two two thank you she's paper towels and then you finally got them eating off. The counter is to the point. Okay I want to. I want to go to for you get you get it one step at a time. They can't come out and say, Bill Maher is a hard core conservative. They can say he's a bit reactionary. Okay, he may be a liberal, but he's definitely reactionary. Then they say well he's a phony liberal, a phony liberal and they go. Even further than that? So first, the title of it is the phony liberals in bill. Maher. Okay, now

They haven't told you bill. Maher's conservative have until just a libertarian or anything like that, because if they did, you would then be a like what get out of your bill Maher, I'm I'm gonna read it so they come the phony. That's other sign he's just a phony. Now you read the article and it brings us to the next attack, look Bill Maher where they say. Where is it? Where is it at okay? I am a libertarian there. It is halfway down the article. Indeed, when asked he has been explicit about his ideology, quote I'm a libertarian. He said to rolling stone. I would be a Republican if they would, which means that I, like the Barry, Goldwater, can party even the Reagan Republican Party. His choice in naming the two figures whose mission was to up and the liberal order, often through appeals to racism and white nationalism, is telling and there it is. They start you off with something like phony liberal. They bring you to Libertarian.

And, in the same paragraph, call the and white nationalist bone there it is, you said: they've walked to their They can't imagine there. An article saying Bill Maher supports the Party of Racism and white nationals, and they would then nobody would believe it they'll be like you are nuts this, how it's done. Quote I want a mean old man to watch my money. He added, because government is a sieve. Take as much money as it can and gives it away it usually needlessly. Yet corporate media continue described him as a liberal is excellently crafted argument. In my opinion I'm, I'm not gonna, I'm not saying they're wrong, that's their opinion. Their opinion can be whatever they want to be, but I I think this is crafted perfectly to to bring in people who are fans of Bill Maher and walk them through the filtration. System, that leaves them thinking. Bill Maher is a white nationalist. I'm not

I dreading. They say that appealing to white nationalism in the article bill Maher is all right. That's where they're walking through and they're doing a really really really really good job of an x one. Another thing to you: I have to talk about how you you change people's hands and there's three steps in the basic principles of a social engineering on opinion. It is the report, the extreme and the turn. Those are the three parent umbrellas can be very complicated, but the report would be if you are change someone's mind, and this is this is the truth. You can't approach them as enemies. You have to have a rapport with them. So in a minute

you live strategy. What you do is you look great, you agree with them. So let's say you meet somebody and they say I don't like charts are this. They say they say I love chocolate ice cream. You agree with them, you hi, fi them and say chocolate is the best. It is absolutely the best right. Nothing can be chocolate. You've now told them, I'm just like you. This lowers their. The next step is the extreme, the extremist, something they cannot agree with the extreme, be something like I think chocolate is so good. I would live only eat chocolate ice cream. If you stuffed dirt and human waste in it. That's how good chocolate is there going to be like? Oh, what's wait and then you say: okay, I guess not hello.

Chocolate ice cream is good. It's that simple. They still leave that conversation liking chocolate ice cream. What you've done is you've. You basically incepted them into the idea that chocolate is not perfect. You've made their idea that there is a limit to what chocolate could be think about it in terms of politics, Barack Obama. Someone says, I love Obama. The first thing you do. Is you high five and say me too? I love Obama to now that they think you're the same you put with weather. You say something like you know. The best thing about was ever done and then site something horrifying, which I won't do, but I'll give you an example like when he went when he drone strike to family a small village of twenty three when children killing the children. You praise that extensively. I love

Alabama did all this man. It was so amazing dropping those bombs body parts flying all is amazing. You say so extreme and intense the person's going to be like that's disgusting, horrifying. What that's that that that's not no, absolutely it's terrible, and then you made the idea. You say: okay, well, of fine, I mean! Maybe it's not perfect and that's how you inch someone's an outlet and also a look at this article. They start you off by saying the phony liberal they presented to you his support of where, where is it out of white okay, I went too far. They present to you how he supports white nationalism. There is an end racism that that he's appealing to that That's what he really wants and then they they walk. You down and say he's just really ultimately Mars with an impressive following continues to a spot

Starkey, elitist hot, takes weekly for HBO earning ten million dollars per year. Call me a racist, a bigot or an astute businessman. Just don't call a liberal, you see they've done it's an excellent version of this. You enter bill, my ours, a phony, you get the middle. He said it was a libertarian any supports these politicians. Those politicians support white nationalism, a bit too extreme you're gonna be like whoa whoa whoa Bill Maher does not support. Nationalism. I think it down and say well, fine, but just don't call him a liberal. You see how they've done it bill is next on the upping block. This is this. Is this is actually really really well crafted article? It's it's you know I I will.

If this individual at fair is, is familiar with the tenants of social engineering because they've they flowed perfectly you you you, you start him off. Like he's a phony liberal, he even might be all right, a white nationalist and then the average person is shocked and says, get out. You're, not you say there. It is well fine, fine call, just don't call him a liberal and the average person does yeah sure five was not a white nationalist. Exactly look at that Bill Maher your up next and they will not support you. You are an obstacle in the way for the new wave of the far left, I to Terrian political party, and they will take you out next, we'll see what happens we'll see. What happens next? Rang out stick around next will be tomorrow at one thousand am podcast at six hundred and thirty. I will see you all next time.