Alexandria or cause you're. Cortez has refused to pay her house dues to the democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and what were we're talking about weird inside politics, that most people probably don't care about something just break it down for you, basically, you'll see as raise nearly five million dollars. The democratic congressional Campaign Committee wants to help you some of that money to fund other Democrats to win the house majority or to defend it in twenty twenty. You'll, see, is refusing to pitch in, and many people are upset some even calling her a deadbeat. What actually calling on Democrats to stop funding the decency, basically declaring war on the democratic establishment after this controversy exploded, he's defended her position, saying that Why should we find them if they are not owing to allow progressive groups to run primaries against Democrats. Basically, she saying I want to upset the democratic incumbents

bring in far left insurgents and, if you won't allow it, I'm going to tell me base to stop donating to you. This is generally bad news for Democrats and I'll show you why look the far left is not going to win. Ok, we ve seen in the gallop all of you. If you saw the video the other guy yesterday morning or the day before that the country actually ticked towards conservative. Unless people now identify as liberals. What's all bad news for the Democrats that they ve got a far left activists contingents targeting them see refusing to back down and ask the war. Now something interesting happens you seek earlier today. I was admittedly kind board like there's, not a whole lot of news. It's Saturday right Saturday, right am its assent. Today, the years always start the year always start slow, and I didn't know if there was going Really isn't it talk about until I saw this on advertisements targeting me from Abkhazia quarters- and I thought to Myself- I don't live in her districts. Why

You try to get money from me. I basically live and I live in New York's first district, it's blue, not New York, our new Jersey and live in New York, so I decided to look into it ads and as it turns out a yo see since the start of the year I spent around thirty. She spent thirty four thousand three hundred and eighty two dollars in the past seven days from this January. Third till the knife and she's actually run from the from December. Thirty, first till today what I believe, around seven hundred and eighty advertisements? It may actually be like seven seventy, but I think I think of the total number might be seven hundred and eighty two ads or cause you were TAT is running a massive add bullets. Ok, spending around thirty five thousand dollars, not the biggest amount, but it is just a week. But, interestingly, one of the talking points of her ads

is that she is facing a Levin challengers. Do you know what that means? Eight of them, I believe our Republicans and the other three or actually Democrats or cause Yo Cortez- is actually campaigning on the fact that Democrats Archer begging to unseat her now there's been other issues here in involving removal of ABC, we saw bad from CNN saying, oh cause architecture leave the Democratic party. Of course they dont want her here, because she was complaining that Joe Biden in her should be in the same party. So we ve got a far left war going on. We have the story not from a couple days ago. It says far uniting for all out attack to block Joe Biden. So here's. What do I want to talk about the latest battle between cosmic artisanal democrats? They are, really trying to unseat her moderate Democrats running in her district she's actual raising money based off that fact, ok, she's telling! bull around the country that these people want

remove me and I need your money. So the couple things I want to address them, war between Alien, the Democrats, the ads in some of the agent who sees targeting and a big factor here that cause has an actually a larger portion of Democrats get their funding from outside their district. Why? It would seem but a good portion of the Democrats who won their congressional, how seats, I believe, around. You know sixty five to seventy percent compared to Republicans ART Ansari. Let me put this wave of the people whose income donations primarily come from outside of their districts? It tends to be two thirds or more almost double Democrat versus Republicans of Democrats are primarily winning by uniting with other big, wealthy urban districts to fun now urban areas. I find a particularly interesting and I'm going to show you the data, but before we get started, makes you had over two. New channel Youtube outcomes liked him cast, I r L, a new show is starting soon. I've got some people coming up. It will be

moderately co, how state it's gonna be a lot of funds can be relatively apolitical. So if you get it, if it is, if you find it mine, numbing all of the crazy political talk inside based what kind of stuff nature you go to Youtube outcomes lashed him cast iron, I'll subscribe. I've got a couple streams. I might do a stream later, but admittedly, I'm waiting for Godiva Building inspector comments up like that, but it with within about a week. We should be ramping up. You can see a major up great on this stuff, but let's get to is you, may have seen the story he riles dams by refusing to pay party dues, bankrolling colleagues, opponents now this is it necessarily new information is if we go back in time to have the tweet? Yes, I think it saw back in March of twenty nineteen He actually tweeted the deceased theses new rule to blacklist and boycott anyone who does business with primary challengers is extremely divisive and harmful to already my recommendation, if your eyes All dollar donor pause your

donations to decency and give directly to swing candidates instead, she then calls out Michael event of California Lorn on what up a bunch of other Democrats, this, not the first I'm a Yossi a straight up said: don't give your money to the democratic wing? the debt that the organisation that seeks to get congressional candidates reelected give it to the insurgent candidates, who are going to primary them and remove them, and that is better the far left analyses primary strategy the whole time. I can respect to a certain extent It's also listen you'll see been telling Democrats what they should or should be doing. She's been pressuring Democrats to vote certain is she slammed Nancy Pelosi? Another Democrats for not supporting impeachment then later, when oh, I'm totally over it and she's gonna. See them anyway. This is but a common tactic of the far left that no matter what you do, no matter. If you apologize no matter if you agree, they will not play ball. You can take a look at chick filet right. You see that story the sea

regret their decision that date essentially said we're not gonna go into these organisations working to donate, to different organizations really bending the need to follow activists who are still campaigning to get them, removed the apology, nothing so Nancy, plus he bent over backwards and says fine, we'll do impeachment, where we are now well on patients, but it is asked her its help. Try immensely and what does not cause the crisis response. Did she come around and say? Thank you for playing the way. I want you to play. No, she said even you do what I say we are still coming for you we will see, fundraiser against you, and I will actively reject contributing to your campaigns and that's where we're at now. Oh cause Yo Quartet defends decision not to pay house Democrats, pain boots and it's kind of simple she basically just tweeted on off. I need a whole story for it. She said in response started to scoop. She was with holding a quarter million thousand deuce she's that I give quite a bit too fellow Democrats we fund raised over three

four thousand four others with over fifty percent going to swing seat D c c c, made clear they will blacklist organization that helps progressive candidates. Like me, I can choose not to fund that kind of exclusion, so it is fair to point out that the establishment Democrats are actively doing that and she's pushing back. But at the same time, don't be surprised if they reject voting with you. If you are actively pushing against them. As I've stated many times, we don't have to political parties. We have three, we have the progressives, MC rats and the Republicans and the progressive and then and then the other Democrats do not agree and are actively fighting each other. But let's do this. Let's take a dive right now into the ad campaigns being run by a yo see this is this appeared on my facebook page, which I find kind of funny, because I guess it means that they think I'm a progressive but hey, surprise, surprise,

your sees add reads: eleven candidates are running to unseat me in the house. They ve already raised more than one million dollars to spend against us. In response, we set a very specific of raising eight hundred and forty nine thousand one hundred nineteen dollars this month. The exact amount two of our public, it up its rays to spend against us our average donation right now is sixteen thousand eighty one cent, so we need about fifty thousand five hundred and twelve contributions to meet our goal, and we ve just but it's a we're. Only seven percent of the way can count on you to donate today. Well me: no, because I don't live in your district and I do find it very strange that doesn't how politics is basically one in this country not offend ass, if any kind of funny that the donate button isn't real on the ads, but also that a second I decided to pull up facebooks, add library, they show you all of the ads. She's she's bought, and I started scrolling down and how scrolling down and I scroll down more and eventually I got tired and I just jump way way down, and it appears

I could be wrong on the number, but around approximately seven hundred, and eighty two adds since the start of this year from JANET we started the ninth. We can see she spent just about the closer thirty five thousand dollars- thirty four thousand dollars, and let's take a look at some of the Ets yoked. I find this very interesting in one at that was less than a hundred dollars. She got two to three thousand impressions, mostly in California, you can see mostly targeted. Women are not Europe that the intent it it doesn't appear to you, we who she's actually targeting with these ads or I couldn't find it in another, add she seriously target women and again New York, Texas, California. Another add I pulled up mostly men again, New York, Texas, California, and that seems to be the case and I think it's fair to say it could just be because there is more of urban centres, facebooks can deliver adds if they are not saying where they want the ads to go. It might end up more so in some of these more populated states spur to point out,

however, it does mean that a yo is going to be collecting a substantial amount of money from outside of her district and this story from August. Twenty, Twenty teen says exactly that most campaign contributions come from outside candidates districts. Now this actually not true for everybody, but we can see, but as of August, twenty Eightth is before, I believe, ABC actually officially, once you do in the primary look where donations come from, only five percent at the point of this of this story actually came from her district around forty three forty four point: five percent did come from her stay So that's a bit fair, but it came from maybe major urban centres does the Bay area LOS Angeles, Santiago, Miami Austin, Hawaii Chicago? I think it's pretty obvious right. Let's do this, here's, a here's, some data from open secrets in district versus out of district now most candidates who

fund raising an art, particularly famous they they are mostly in district donations and very small amounts. Elsie is not the worst into so this is twenty eight data. We can see that T J Cox of Democrat from California raised zero. Percent from from their district guy. We have a Republican, who is ninety nine percent out of district, but only raised eighty two thousand dollars on these important point out? Many of these candidates raised when a couple hundred grand or less but many of the democrats- raising millions, Gina Jones of Texas, four point: nine million with ninety nine that coming from outside or district. I'm not gonna do a deep, deep dive, but what I can tell you is that get a general analysis and found that around Wendy or so of these. These these out of district candidates are a around a hundred thirty one and thirty, two or so are Democrats. So Democrats are almost two to one more likely than Republicans to be funded from outside their districts and Allison

there's free speech. You dont have eleven someone's district to fund their campaign, but I do really really not. I dont think that idea right, I kind of feel like you should be funded by and represent the people in your district because imagine this let's say you live in a district, that's got fresh natural spring water and the people of that district for the most part are actively campaigning saying we don't want. Now We are, however, coming in and taking our spring water and then sure enough certain districts in packs and people who, like what nicely does or some other company starts, dumping ridiculous cash into your campaign or using super cap super packs to run commercials to benefit you you winning and you turn around and say thanks for the support waters, all yours, if the will of the people locally, who are actively paying attention and campaigning, cannot compete with massive funding and commercials for

the district then you're gonna get a lot of people. Warned me misinformed and vote against their own interests or cause. Your court has won through primary. We can see here Only ninety four percent in twenty eighteen actually came. I'm sorry percent came from within our district at one million dollars. Ninety four from outside of her district, and now we we know she's raised around five million and she's actively soliciting donations from the rest of the country again, nothing illegal here I just find it particularly interesting- this politics is run and that it is mostly democrats doing that. Here's! What the ad says when you click on is fighting for progressive Paul, is that can help create social, racial and economic justice for all, that's why she taking zero dollars from corporations and lobbyists and is relying on the grass roots to power. Her campaign that's actually true. She really is doing that. I do think it's really. Really silly, though, when they say they dont take money.

Corporations, because a cursory Google search will reveal corporations can't actually make donations Woodhull campaigns. I get it though there talking about political action committees that receive you know there there simplifying it's, like. I think it's fair to point out a Yossi absolutely is, true. True to our word, almost all of her donations, I believe, to halve the number of older people go. Eighty one point: four three for this current election cycle come from small individual contributions below two two hundred dollars. Eighty percent are from large contributions and point three nights come from political action committees, she's got a minus of other out o their means. She. How do you? How do you donate negatively? Whatever the point as it is fair to say? Yes, a Yossi is not taking money from packs, she is doing smaller nations throughout campaigns. Take it for what it is. Now, let's get to the final point, if you ve made it this foreign, you actually care about this stuff. Congratulations o cause, it were tat, is campaigning on the

act. That's it's not just republican challenges. Now that is the focus of our campaign, but she seriously is targeting she'd being targeted by Democrats, and what I said in that up activity from CNN. They said it's tough ABC, should leave the party Democrats of cholera Deadbeat and many don't like her now there is a growing wait, a progressive slowly taking over the Democratic Party and because of the two party system. Well, actually, really really bad news you see by by splitting up the democratic coalition and an fracturing this way and campaigning against them. She is forcing these Democrats to focus on some on stopping democratic, primary challengers, spend thing their war chest to fight Democrats and not Republicans, and that means that it republicans the Democrats right now, the twenty Twond fighting in its here's. Here's the disadvantage, they're all fighting against each other, so they may be. Raising a ton of money called,

to be more than Donald Trump to an extent, but that must spend that money fighting each other and Trump only has to fight them. Now has been focusing more on Bernie Sanders Cause is tasty stake in the Lee. I think it's fair to say the activists are gonna like Bernie Sanders. That's that's kind of obvious, but when it comes to these congressional campaigns and twenty twenty not only do is, is the Trump factor, the truck bay. Gonna come out and rose. Not only are we seeing people less likely to identify as liberal, but you also to consider that these incumbent Democrats are fighting off. Oh cause, Yo Cortez, not just Republicans, so they ve got two big foot on two fronts. This is fighting and fracturing democrats- and I think it's gonna- get a massive advantage to the Republicans. But this brings me who another Abed Chrysalis, of CNN says, is this

examined Rio cause Yo Cortez his Democratic Party. Now he was on talk about how the Democratic Party has increasingly become more progressive, and I think it's a fair point that, yes, for a long time, the press it have been gaining round they want people like Bernie. Many of them are socialists, but something happened. Well, I think it's fair to point out a Yossi gained a lot of ground, there's a flipping happening according to gallop, and I showed this the other day even with this, The democratic party people are more likely to identify as conservative. What is that for? I see she can wage this world What's an. Raising all this money from outside of our district, because progressives are banding together to try and upset the established order. I can respect that to a certain degree, but I kindly I think, I'm not I'm not a fan of the policies she's promoting I'm, certainly not a fan of crony Democrats, who literally do nothing, but they are trying to get rid of her and other ways. So is it her party? Not yet, I think it's affair

point two measures. The future I mean she's got five million plus followers. She raised five million dollars as a single term incumbent, that's amazing, that's huge, the progressives are seriously waging this war, but here's toy from Town Hall depend. Loss of ale sees district highlights white Democrats fumed over trumps proposed twenty twenty cents exchanges many people within our district are concerned. She might actually lose her district. I believe it's not going to twenty twenty will see. I don't wanna reiterating what will come into play and maybe twenty twenty four, but right now Democrats have actually talked about a plan to eliminate her district outright. You may be saying so what shall still live in the congressional sure you can still run yes, but let's say there are this her district and two districts around her and you ve got person a person be and Elsie. If our district gets

Christ. She is gonna, be challenging incumbent on other incumbent, popular Democrat, who is from the surrounding area and they're gonna point to all of the facts: years of a Yossi and say do not let her take this, but not only that in twenty twenty she's facing, I believe, three democratic power. Mary challenges and I'm gonna say. I think she can lose us one. I really really do in twenty eighteen only about sixty thousand dollars from her campaign came from her own district. She was promoted and funded from outside the district and having to be going up against someone who is arrogant and didn't think they could lose Joe Crowley been even debater, so he lost. She had a couple thousand more votes than have been won the price.

Very uncertain immediately saying I won, because we all knew it didn't matter who won the primary. That district is going Democrat, so there's something different happening today. She lost some some twenty five to forty thousand jobs to the Amazon Deal and the Democrats are going we funding this. They thought of her as a fluke. They saw her as a nobody shall never win and she did. What do you think the democratic establishment going to do now? I ll tell you this man. Dark money will come a flyin, but I will I do want to point out the reason why there so desperately trying to shut her down five thirty, it s a story why the Democrats have. Lifted over the last thirty years and when appointing important about this graph, weakens the around the start of the twenty tens there was a massive spike in government helping black people, immigration and paying for healthcare now,

Your thing, I think, is somewhat related, particularly with Bernie Sanders growth in popularity and a lot of people pushing up, but that there's another fact. I've pointed to a lot is that, though it's the rise of Facebook, the algorithm pushed out intersection reality. This resulted in people being in an it is over and over and over again with racial justice ideas and then demanding it was an excellent absolutes for people like a yo, see who only then just jump down the bandwagon and instead of pushing things that make sense like Middlesex. Sound environmental policy. She paused pushes equity for all in like free jobs at or university college, or whatever but it was social media that drove his fracture. Not every Democrat is on social media, so you have the young people. Primarily leftist, primarily believing the stuff and the older generation that isn't on social media. Remaining more moderate in the voter breakdown. We can see a thirty four

means for burnt offer Bernie Sanders just slightly there's a big faction voting for fur forbidden in even among eighteen, thirty, four year olds, but beyond that it is bite and all the way it is the youth active on social media that we're berated and inundated with a social justice content, and now they hold these views and you can see these spikes electors and access data, but I leave you with this aim, see is not the only one waging war from Fox NEWS. Far left you It is for all for all out attack. Bitin block say from political: the progressive movement is kicking with a full scale: wacko mobilization against the former vice president marked by intensified attacks in protest designed to bloody Joe Biden in advance of the ILO Caucasus. And in one of latest Poles Bernie Sanders took the lead binds down. They say the grassroots assault hit from a vote you have angle starting Monday, when the progressive Change Campaign Committee demanded Biden, retract statements about sexism and politics hours later, the group in

missile indivisible, criticized him over as immigration plan than active, along with the sunrise movement recently picketed him, and York City fundraiser, hosted by a billionaire. Let me tell you some: it doesn't matter if Joe Biden is being propped up in the polls latte this when they pull Democrats there pulling passive Democrats, but I will tell you who's gonna go out and vote the activists. It is my firm belief, bar standards will take this one all the way and that's going to pave the way for a massive Donald Trump victory, because the average Democrat does not want social the average democratic asked and they say bye for sure, but the average Democrat won't vote in a primary. They will vote in the general. Why should, I should say the average, but many Democrats are not going about the prime. Bernie is based, is gonna go out in droves, they're going to appoint burn Sanders monotony and then, when it

as a general tromp is going to have a massive landslide. I could be wrong outside us all wrap this up. The Democrats are at war with each other, and that means they are fighting off attacks from each other. Not now it's cool primary season. Of course, as is normal, but we're going into this there's congressional seats up for grabs and that means going only twenty, it's not about primaries. It's about moderate Democrats facing off primary challenges and they're gonna lose, and it's about I'll. Tell you this man when, when, when The progressive Democrats, primary the moderates in the trunk districts yeah, those those If you're going to opt for a number of reasons now, I said before trumps base will beyond twenty twenty, so they're going to vote for tromp in bigger numbers and Republicans will win back. These districts also consider if the Democrats primary the moderates with a progressive like ABC, wants to do. It will swing even harder. I'll tell you what man you look at Jeff, Andrew right, the guy afflict parties and he's a motto:

you know he is he's gotten a good rating from the and our own stuff. Like that, you see he sees a moderate Democrat. He won because there were some Democrats CUP, some conservatives willing to support him. You cause, you're Cortez in his district, and it will be our plus thirty from all people freaking out saying we do now want the crazy socialist lady representing our district. So if they primary like ails, you want to do expect a republican Super majority. I think the Democrats are in trouble and I think the far left will lie we still gain ground likely still when, because most of the Democrats are passive and don't care the far left it's gonna take over and there will be a reckoning after twenty twenty. If the Democrats don't get back, rack exhort catering to moderates again because it was. The Gallup poll shows us out of all the parties sought of three factions: conservative, moderate liberal you ve got thirty some outpost,

conservative, thirty, some odd percent moderate and twenty four percent liberal and going down after twenty twenty. There will be a reckoning on the Democrats. We'll never went again if the progressives are allowed to keep taking over in the safe districts these, blue districts will become unsafe swing districts as people flocked to the Republican Party in fear of whatever this is that it was. He represents Oliver their stick around next I was coming up at six p m you to dot com slashed. Him cast a news. It is my other channel and I will see you all in IRAN. Has fine He admitted it they shot down that plane. We all know it, and I gotta say this when story first broke, we had missiles rights coming out of IRAN, a plane crashes- we all knew in the back of our minds and I'm gonna take this I must say something I normally- for- I probably wouldn't say normally but think about epstein- think about a ton of others

lorries, where you just know, ok, how stupid do they think we are that IRAN's firing fifteen missiles and a plane crashes. And they say it was just at the same time as we are at war and launching this cross our border a few hours later on, highlighted our anti aircraft missiles guarding our airports because we're concerned, but you're retaliation, a plane crashes after bursting into flames. Its radio turns off it veers to the right and fireball crashes in the ground, and then we bulldozed space come on at a certain point. We all knew I wasn't. My heart goes out of people who lost their lives there, memorial services and I'm glad IRAN is finally admitting it and I'm hoping now with them. For Finally admitting it that we will, actually see some kind of international coming together some sort to curb what IRAN does and has been doing. Listen, I'm not a fan of foreign intervention of what's going on, but at least

the. U S thinks it's their business: that IRAN was we you know engaging in these actions and you know what men of people are. Let me show other right now. Iran is admit it. Let me show you something from John Pilcher he'd deleted this tweet. He said Iran has admitted accidentally shooting down Ukraine airliner. So while I was wrong to jump to a conclusion, what is not in doubt is that true, murder of a foreign leader set the train set it set in the train, the precarious set set in train the precarious events that led to this tragedy and could lead to all out war Are you kidding me? You know it's insane to me. Let me tell you exactly Alex went to my friends. Outside my family and their like, which he club started it by time. That general and I say you- that general started by trying to burn down our embassy. You mean America started,

targeting the militias. You mean the militia started by taking on an american contractor and targeting U S, troops you mean over and over and over again, and we go all the way back to you. Do you mean IRAN started for trying to you know for conflict with Israel and setting militias up in the Middle EAST. Yale came in this is not a cop it started overnight and you the problem is this have explained The same problem we have to answer for What goes around bashing skulls and the new doesn't care because they're not you know, no one. It's just that I just I don't care right. So I saw a guy got no fight whack, another guy. That happens all the time. Who cares what they do it all the time? see, I am not going to be like top of than you know, our breaking news annual club, the guy, so you have eight hundred

US instances where anti. What does all these things and the media coverage? Because each thing is kind of small but consistent? You then have these big spikes of the far right. Where, like you know that one guy will do one crazy thing and its its tragic and its mass tragic event would like ten year dozens people lose their lives, and that makes the news and it makes sense. I understand why does so isn't happening. How many people go? Ask your friends and family who has your parents a mom? glass. Your liberal member data, whenever mom, how do you feel about IRAN trying to burn down or iranian militias or supporters, trying to burn down the embassy and you're going to say I was talking to my family wotes troves fault for target this general, and I was like, gets the generals fault for targeting embassy and there's a wait. What you mean they to burn down the embassy, they torture, the lobby and whether and and and and the guard post- and I think they got like two rooms and the Marines had to come in and around the building. Really

You know what man we shouldn't be there in the first place, but how insane you have to be to be like its trump fault, that IRAN blew up a commercial airliner, listen. Well targeted the guy in Iraq, where our troops are after his support Tried to burn down our embassy. I am no fan because I think at a certain point, you need to leave okay. I m never never going to praise triumphantly. And I see on Fox NEWS saying only Democrats praise the cinema was a monster. Ok, he was doing guerrilla. You know insurgent tactics supplying really bad people to do really bad. Things, I'm a band of a guy who knows a bottom settings. Obama was the guy who who label them terrorists. So I get it. I dont like the escalation I dont like the guy either. I dont know what the right thing to do, as I understand why Tom did it, but I just think we're gonna keep staying in this fight.

Ever because it's always gonna be one thing leads to another. Now here's that John Pilcher says Trump did it? Are you kidding me Bush brought us. There has been a plain trump or I'm going to blame. Or Obama, now homage to criticise Trump and Obama for the tactics they use for. The drone strikes me rates, but I think it was the New York Times. That said, tromp has used military force less than all of its predecessors or then, and not all over the past. Several predecessors were well, we ve been them at least now. Trump has wrapped up, strikes, that's my general understanding that it is connected, but you know the left. You know This is true and that I've seen the right thing. It's not, but I've seen this report saying it S. So you? U fact that one? You look it up. The point is I dont like what's going on there? Iran admitted it, but it's mine is coming to me that you, like PETE Buddha Judge, you know not really blaming Trump, but kind of the left is so insane deranged when it comes to everything Trump is doing, is add that they literally blame tromp for the fact that IRAN, fire

missiles, Eddie Rock and then blew up a commercial airliner. Now that's IRAN's vault, I'm dumb, sorry, another admitting it but they're doing the same thing. I think it's. I think it's hilarious that John Pilchards line and enmity this is why I let it is the same talking point of IRAN. Listen, on retaliated IRAN, ok, here's the whole chain of events actually started in the new cycle than I can track. America soldiers were targeted by iranian militias. Unaware in contract was killed. Tromp Italian the drawn strike on the militia display There's got angry and stuff the U S, embassy, torturing, at trying to burn it down. Marines came out scare, the place ah sprays, Cayman Tromp stopped at the letter screaming its trumps, Benghazi Trump then targeted the leader,

the cuts force, the guy who organise all this. Iran got angry and then launched missiles from IRAN into Iraq. So many statement first, I can take a million times we shouldn't be in Iraq. We should not But our, but I think it's fair to point out. We have embassies all over the world and they targeted the embassy, ok we'll talk about who started what they whenever the embassy they weren't going after soldiers. This was a step up. It was so you're versus soldier militias, attacked american troops chop tell your soldiers, they targeted, the embassy, so Trot said you're in Iraq. You his target. Our embassy, I'm taken out your leader once again, Trump when, after a military target, not a civilian targets, so what'd IRAN, due from IRAN's country, fired missiles into Iraq, and then what did they? Do they somehow managed to global commercial airliner? I'm sorry, man,

The? U S is doing in Iraq is wrong in they shouldn't be there. I do not like the escalation. I think we should have left a long time ago and I'll do it took across ended and I'll say I'll I'll quote: Donald Trump, forty seven just leave, because this is just going to keep happening, but as much as I can be critical of the EU ass in the Middle EAST. I still think it's fair point out. Tromp is act. Under the two of you, I'm apps authorized by Congress, which, yes, we should repeal, but is a big difference between saying this is a crime. In which we are operating. This is a country where troops stationed and you targeted. Our billion h, Q, we're gonna take out your military leader. Big difference see the difference. Iran decided to fire missiles into a country a huge step up from militias, and soldier verses soldier. Once again, IRAN, in my opinion, is the principal aggressor, escalating the problems. Now I get it, we can go way back.

And see that the U S invading Iraq was it was was was bit based on lies, cause huge problems, but there is a big difference between U S invading Iraq and IRAN firing missiles into Iraq. That's basically on party. Don't blame you for their invasion, while blame IRAN for firing missiles after the is already there. We have an agreement with the current government. I can complain Everything happened in Iraq all day and night, the chain of events going back in time. But the main point is Iran accidentally shot down this airplane because they were the ones who are escalating. The tensions, ok, tromp, acted within the borders of Iraq, trumpet not target the domestic IRAN wrong then did fire internationally tromp did not do that. Ok, so listen while, I certainly think we should have left a long time ago and to quote trumpeted, doesn't seven just leave. I think it's absurd that the law

after so deranged about how much they hate trump their acting like everything's, going on his his fault, it has to be economies to good things. Are going great for America's, it's always trumps fault. You know what I would prefer to see. Gabert, I'm hoping she's the kind of person who would follow through with what even trap set of just leave. It's enough another asking us to get out and they are saying we're not leaving. Ok, what we, maybe maybe we should make. Maybe we ve overstate are welcome. Maybe it's time we stop the escalation and just get out. But I tell you this man, it's not troops fault, Obama's fault. It's bushes fault, it's Bush its Cheney. If the Bush administration, it's the lies about wmds, it was the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan in the first place. Yet what happened in two thousand was a psychotic terrifying moment in american history and we should never forget nine eleven, but two to take that as a pretext for invading the Middle EAST countries at a centrally.

And with what was going on. I say centrally because you have to extend people argue about who supported who was hiding, who wear and things like that, but we ended up bathing in invading Iraq based on a lie that, like that to me, a psychotic wmds, we cannot allow them continue and nothing and here we are seeing a continued escalation. It's time to go I'll, tell you what men Trump should get us out. He absolutely should, and you know what I'm not confident well. That's why I don't. I don't like voting at all white and vote for tromp or Hilary, and I My my maybe would have voted for Bernie, because even you seem like a difficult a politician. I won't do that again, we'll see what happens with the anger Dulcy, but I think trumps going real action, and that's why I want. I want to see him get our troops on with five thousand in Iraq. It is a decent amount, but it's not like. We have you no fifty, two hundred thousand. So it's time we leave, you know we let the chips fall where they do.

You know we need to set up a treaties and agreements of foreign countries. I don't know, I don't know what the issue is at this point. May I maybe there's just too much topsecret stop. I don't know about, and I think it's fair to say, but at a certain point, you're gonna keep seeing stories like this and I guess my main criticism is. I can sit right and say I dont know why we're still there there may be a legitimate reason: I'm not stupid there, be serious. You know concerns that we don't know about because its classified accept that, but I think if they want to justify having our troops over there and the american people deserve to know beyond you know just where we with its stabilizing force. Now you get you gotta gives a good reason, men bending money where we're loot. We ve got american soldiers over there. We need to bring him back from both. Ghana stand in Iraq and let the

The region is a disaster. I do not. I am sorry unless you're gonna justify it to us, I'm never going to support it. Now it was. It was built upon a life time ago, but trumps started. He did not. Has Trump use less military force while corners in your time. That's the case about it, a bunch of really really bad things to ok, Obama, ACT Obama's extra Judea. Fascination need to be called out, but now it's just the orange man is so bad that even IRAN says you know what we bulldozed the site. It was ass, the laughing well, you know I recognize that they admitted it, but it's not transport somehow got love it I don't I don't know, I don't know what you're expect man. People wonder why I make videos about the Democrats. The way I do They wonder why, as someone who is liberal would be like what's wrong with the Democrats, let me tell you PETE Buddha judge you eat it's like I don't know. I want to play this hyperbolic game. Warm like he accused the? U S, but he kind of day

right, you like we get it man, it's IRAN's fault, just admit it's! Ok! Even iran- is now saying oaks, while IRAN of course saying it's because of you s, adventure if it wasn't because of the: U S, nodded you're, the one who pulled the trigger. That's on? U K unit responsibility for what you did. So I'm sitting here complaining about the escalation, literally criticising the president saying as much totally understand who slew them was, and I think the problem. I am concerned that Willy de escalation. I understand the reasoning for doing it as I've laid out that but see as a civilian target, Trop targeted and military leader. Ok, there's a lot of complicated factors here. Right is complicated, Dakota Mandarin from our man, three, it's complicated, eight, the fact that the fact is, though, trumped and start this war like to see Trump ended, but what we are seeing in terms of escalation. I put the blame on George W Bush because we should not be there in the first place

somehow the Democrats are still able to twist everything to being trumps fall when Trump didn't start. The war trot came into office, a few years ago, Trop target the military are targeted military on a military target after they targeted a civilian target truck kept there within the borders of the country, we do have congressional authorization, and then IRAN admits it. They all trumps waltz up. Come on, I'll see you all. This is about a segmenting somebody do not assignment dynamic. My main channel, I don't know man whenever I I mean I might just get rid of schedules. Alien, we'll see what happens man so you ended up watching this ten, a m you to death comes liked him cast. I will have a segment up. I think I'm gonna do assignment on how that people, how fat people are causing climate change and not getting it. Actual thing I'll see you well then. Rather Kip

critically. Nancy policy introduced a war resolution to limit Donald Trump powers to engage in certain conflicts in the middle east- and there there's some things about it- that I think makes sense the war. The biggest problems is first of all Yes, the powers to wage war shall be given to Congress and apparently met gates, agrees we'll get him some second, but the big problem is that now policy. Previously sad Obama didn't need authority to wage conflict in Libya, so it seems quite a but whether Not Nancy policy is hypocritical. Has nothing to do with the principle of defending the right of Congress to levy WAR, Matt Gates and a few other Republicans voted. In favour of this resolution, which is non binding by the way. Early doesn't know anything and now, met gates is being dragged really hard by tromp supporters in general,

people saying we'll. Never vote form again he's betrayed the president. He stabbed in the back, and I think that's a big mistake. I think by not supporting that gate met gates. Republicans are giving a perfect talking point to the Democrats. Now a lot of people are arguing because met gates again he's. It means a staunch tromp ally, one of the biggest and republican, because I voted with Democrats he's given them a talking point. No, it's your opposition to his principal choice to defend the right of Congress to wage war which is given to talking point. Let me go the story and we'll explain about it. What's going on from the Washington Post Trump angered by house allies push to limit his authority on IRAN before we get however, had overtaken guest outcomes life, don't it if you would like to support my work, also major check out the new coming shown about a week over at Youtube. Got com slashed him cast iron subscribe. If you like my content, this stuff's not going to be I'm not gonna, be overly like heavy new,

It would be a lot more fun so check that out. But let us get back to the story. They say red met gates of floor republican and staunch ally of President Trop pushed other Republicans to vote in favour of limiting trumps authority, in the military confrontation, with IRAN, drawing ire from the president and other Republicans in Congress. According to AIDS and emails quote, Reclaiming congressional power is the constitutional conservative position. Devon, Murphy, gaiters legislative director rose to all republican offices around eleven. A m type underlining the taxed. According to the email obtained by the Washington Post, the message arguing for Republicans to buck the present ended. We will be voting by voting in favour, of H, Conrad's eighty three and hope you will do the same. It was a risky move. I disagree that surprised the president and showed rare fishers and our Publican party that Trump has firmly controlled trump, fiercely complained about gates after AIDS inform Trump that has always had sent the email backing. The resolution, which

pushed by how Speaker, Nancy, blowsy trumps team lobbied heavily against the non binding resolution you are making a. Huge mistake Republicans. This was the greatest gift to be given to you in TAT. Of strategy and talking points Many not all are throwing it in the gutter. Matt Gates has proven, with his his willingness to join Democrats, that for one everything the Democrats have been doing, but a partisan sham and two Republicans act on principle. I believe met gates, firmly represents those positions, and I think it is wrong to criticise in full but still people on twitter and otherwise are dragging him and giving the left. The perfect talking point that trumps base cares not about principle and that their occult, and if you step out of line, your your problematic and you will be shunned and you'll be removed from office when explain something that gates doesn't care. If your democratic Republican Matt Gate said, the president is right on all of these things.

Met, gaiters spoken about so many issues of principle, and now he is defined. Something that is legitimately true. Congress has the power to levy war, not the president. If Trump wants to target IRAN, he needs congressional approval. Now I must offer second talking about IRAN, I'm not getting it to into it. I just didn't a bonus segment earlier. The pointers trump is acting in Iraq, where we do have congressional authority and its really complicated, of which I am not a fan and think these two authorizations pairs of military force should be repealed. But the fact is Trump is not engaging in IRAN and that's where becomes complicated, but I think it's fair to say that count Even if a non binding resolution has the authority to love you wore and that's what might get his office has said, and I absolutely respect that principle

that gates was willing to say to the Republicans. I will not stand behind tromp. If he's wrong on this one I will act principally and what happened well. He's got a lot of praise from some Democrats and, of course, a lot of Republicans getting angry, but I tell you this: you have an opportunity to defend a man who is willing to cross. Airlines to prove that when it went well when it comes to a rock and a hard place, you will take the principal position, even if it means going against his own party, and that says so much more than what the Democrats were willing to do. Jeff Ben, who had to leave the Democratic Party because they threatened him because he wouldn't support impeachment, and I heavily criticised that You meet these voices, you need a diversity of opinion and you will not always beautiful unified and I will say to the same thing about met gates. Now. Let me show you a few tweets first report from wanting to post here

that mandate circulate in an to other Republicans, urging them to vote to curb trumps IRAN power. Other Republicans, fought back private email show gates was read it out to the White House. Protest is not happy, let me say this Rick Wilson, never tramper, apostate GEO, P, media guy. He says he says this on Twitter. I am going to retreat some of the colts replies to met gates after he got ready and taken of the woods yet by Trump. This is a perfect example of my rule of acidification, of tromp, of the arms of the GNP, these most loved gates until they didn't well, a certain amount of people have dragged gates for it and their right to do so. Look what look look at the talking points you have given to them. Ah proves it republicans- will complain all day and night about the Democrats about them. Forcing people like venture to fall in Van drew defects. Because he is sick of the EU, they threatened him

Democrat, went to his office and said: unless you do what we say we will, we will remove you and suicide. Fine I'll switch parties. This is an opportunity or was to prove that Republicans wouldn't play the same game and they would accept it. Let me show you something: carpet die renowned Trump supporter and mean Psmith saying you can disagree without met with how Matt Gates vote yesterday. I do it's ok to disagree its healthy, but I'm seeing people try to burn into the ground over a bill. They probably didn't, read and efficiently likely don't understand met is one hundred percent behind Trump. Here is my final thought. I see a lot of people Is that expressed concern that he fell for policies, trap and maybe that's correct, but met has been one of the strongest and most effective supporters. Don't fall into Crap yourself when you Burnham at stake for no reason, no reason equals

voting in the affirmative twin non binding, constitutionally grounded bill. I ran into space to make that clear. I completely agree with copper copied outcome. I think the actual up here was that policy was baiting republicans into pushing against a constitutionally backed bill, consciously grounded bill so that you can say: aha, it was it's something so stupidly obvious. I gotta tell you man, I read through it: it's nothing, it's really nothing and met gates, I'm not gonna fall for them to do the right thing, and now he is getting dragged ridiculously entourage foresight and believe it. To be honest, I thought no way this is this. Is them you know that the never Trumpery and the wolf to iraqi people exist joining what's really happening, and then I looked at the responses to carpet duncombe what s this post It was. Not even can services get ratio now, Carbine Duncombe did not get ratio, there's actual

more support. It would seem to retreat the idea of carbon duncombe that you can defend met gates. So let me make it clear: I am not criticising every single Republican here, but I absolutely no I'm criticising the ones who are dragging met gates for doing the right thing, stand up, prove you act on principle and say something better than the Democrats have said in the past. The Democrats have continually said fall in line, or else there undergoing a man. Of civil war. They can't think that both the moderates, the far left town Van drew in or out you you're, either with a sword against us. Don't do the same thing prove there. Publicans are willing to accept people who might disagree. I'll. Tell you this as much as Trump is angry. For doing this. Tromp endorsed Jeff Andrew who is voted against him and voted nearly in line with everything Lucy pushed when Van drew said their frightening me. I'm gonna switch truck, shook his hand and is now going to a campaign in Wildwood trot should learn a lesson to drop should be,

things like, I respect, Matt Gates for his principled position. I firmly disagree. This is the opportunity to prove you have principle on your side. Instead, what we get is long twitter thread. He sided with the gems, so is actually not one hundred percent with Road Donald Trump. Sorry Jeff, Andrew Duff, side with dams or the Republicans he refused to engage in part is a nonsense and he said there is no reasonable peach. This present, I refused to do it and when and where the left they would Democrat say he's only do met because he's scared he won't get reelected. Maybe they went to his office apparently inside. Unless you you, you have to vote our way or will primarily you so he defected met gates should not be forgotten that same thing from up from a publicans, but our publicans that come out the concerns that come out and dragged met gates for this. They are doing basically the same thing with a democratic undoing buck the tribe defend your principles.

And Matt Gates has been one of the biggest supporters of tromp. So if you're trumps border, you should be say what copper Duncombe assent and it really does look like most people agree there willing to accept met gates having a different opinion to defend a constitutionally rounded bill and consequently rounded bill, and I think Palacio setting a trap. I really do she says it is widely populist and popular to avoid this conflict, on multiple segment. Saying do not do this. It's a bad idea. There are. A lot of people would get behind Trubner matter what its effect but policy, in my opinion, sees what Tucker assaying sees what what the General America America sang and so she, you know footsore collar up and says boom nonbinding resolution. Take the bait please and met gates. I know I'm not taking a bait, it's a good bill. I get it it's not on finding for everyone. Why what's it going to do nothing and now he's getting dragged forth, but let me show you this: I gotta be really full about the articles that I pull up, because you know Youtube going to come after me. Look up right, this stupid screens NBC when you don't Nancy,

please vote on a war powers resolution to rein in tromp on IRAN is hypocritical. Democratic leaders didn't act against. Almost military overreach as he launched attacks across the Middle EAST and North Africa. Yes, it's really funny to me. They say I hear and Fox NEWS eminent Dominic you're here this bright screen I gotta move is over. What is this one? I am I here on Fox NEWS. They say only that Dumb grants are upset with Trump over. You know, either Europe Leftist or a Democrat. That's you're mad, about which I did not true why is fair to say. I am alive as well. A liberal, leftism liberal mean different things, my criticism of was founded in reality. My criticism, escalation in Iraq is putting the blame solely on tromp. If you listen to might my segment Am I dead about. You know IRAN, I gotta be careful, czarist factor a Youtube operates. I get it. There's two authorizations pairs of military force. Tromp is operating under them and if we want to change that Congress needs for appeal, I didn't want to theirs

reason why the resolution is non binding because they don't really want it. The Democrats love the machine, same as everybody else, so they need to pretend like their opposing the president. That's the game, it's a trap, but that's what I hear right. Arms are on the left. Literally. Everything trump does is Long that's insane. That makes no sense. How could everything he does be wrong? It's impossible! A broken clock is right twice a day right, but no true. Want to pull our soldiers out program files say Trump wants to bring our soul. Then a rough I say, but what you know what man than in my favor is about Syria trumped up all the troops out? They say how. How could trust me doing this? You have any idea

Ok, fine! Only the soldier soldiers there. How could trompe doing this? That's the problem if met gates, periodically votes out of line with our public and party line, he's proving the Republicans act on principle and there actually better than the Democrats when it comes to standing up where they will even but check this out. This is crazy story to me from NBC News Republicans, Thomas Massey of Kentucky Matt Gates and Francis Rony. Both I voted for the measure. While aid Democrats voted against it, why is anybody dragging gates over this? This was a mixed vote. Who cares little this Joe Cunningham of South Carolina Josh got Heinrich New Jersey, Kendra Horde of Oklahoma, and she's. Where the moderates alignment,

Virginia Band, MC items of Utah, Stephanie Murphy, Florida, Anthony Brindisi and MAX Rosebud from New York. That was a lot of the moderates coming out in an opposing the bill from policy. The Democrats are dragging them. I mean to an extent probably, but if that is not the big story, don't let them take this advantage of you. You know what man it's it's. It sets a really bad example when you allow Rick Wilson to gloat the dude, in my opinion, doesn't have principles. So many on the left simply say: Orange man, bad it on repeat, it's like that you have video of the guy gobbling at the Turkey's internal gobble back seriously. Gotta see it's hilarious, the viral video, that's what it is trumps has something unlikely work. You not go, don't say anything. It's like literally Trump will say. Then an outward add the word bad to the end of it Trump says no to, in Syria and they say motors and Syria bad and trust us ok, troops in zero troops, troops in Syria bad? So so so, how

Are you now allowing them to take this point? Magnates. Did the right thing before the vote we could have supported criticized the: U S, attack on learning, saying the resolution would send a clear statement that truck shouldn't take for their military action against Iraq without approval from Congress last week. In our view, the administration conducted a provocative, disproportionate airstrike against IRAN, which endangered Americans and did so without consulting Congress posts that ETA Weakliness Conference completely hypocritical, and I do respect, policy statements- and I gotta admit you- know her reasoning behind this. I also got respect. That's why I think it was a trap. I think she's trying to be manipulated we ve seen the sound bites or have you seen from C span a reporter says: are you saying? Obama doesn't need congressional approval and she goes yes think about that. Libya. We have no authorization for authorization for. Of Military Force- and she still claimed. Obama was justified to do it. That to me is insane see that was the rapid action,

of Executive Authority happening battering Obama administration that I That's only like another point was making a few minutes ago when they sat on Fox NEWS. Only the left is critical of what tromp dead. I guess perhaps You know I think there have been some. You know, people who are on the right who are concern about escalation. But then I go back the people saying where was nobody. You know during Obama. Well, I was right here. Ok, I've got videos talk about, and the idea you I'm ass, explaining what's wrong with it. I was very critical of what Obama was doing and I have no problem saying it I have no problems and that after Obama was a big support of burning and then, when Bernhard plan these games. I am no longer support of burning this. What really bothers me, why can't people just have like just just be honest about what you think should or should we have?

I guess it's fair to say these people were met, it gates are simply people of warlike trump is right, no matter what, but that kind of proves appoint the Democrats, and you know it so be it unfortunate. But there are these people do exist and have criticised that you must really funny the longest time there have been people complaining to him. All you do is rare gone. The Democrats ones the other boot gonna drop when the Republicans do something that at that, that's that's! That's hypocritical are worthy of criticism, because the biggest thing I see right is that for of all Libya, and what's going on right now are different things there was off is authorised Asian for one on its technic technically there's two authorizations and I'm critical them, and then you have Libya, which had no authorization. Well, conservatives were critical of Libya Die Guy, get it Congress, never authorized. And now you have Democrats being critical of what Democrats actually authorize a long time ago. It does disconnect here if republicans come out and say here's what

We are for and they'll shake hands in agreeing pet each other on the back where Myspace say Republicans believe thing o shock. But what happens when O Cassio Cortez says? Pete booted judge takes money, millionaires and then someone pulls up her record. No, like you received money from billionaires too, and then she goes zip. Yet that's hypocrisy, when Bernie Sanders says the billion knows in the dock money we gotta get money to politics and it turns out he started. You started to five Valencia foreigners got dark money circulating behind his campaign. To unlike great, I will call that out trumps a bill it will bring about playing a billion air travel supporters brag about trump and everything is accomplished. The you know what men trot said that infamous you know line grabbed the women. By that you know I gotta be carefully on Youtube: family friendly, red women, tromp supporters, start buying shirts. That said it. So the left, like all of how trot troops are disgusting and I'm like this like that. He says this. Ok, what am I supposed to say trumpets gross? I have a lot

but I wanna do ragged Republicans for laughing about it and liking. It trumps that a lot of things that I dont like use a lot of rhetoric. I dont like an uncritical of it. What am I supposed to do? Make a video words like Trump supporters agree with Trump. What about when Democrats, all out a certain thing and then do it and say nothing what about when they present no evidence and say the cat After all these years, these are things that are really easy to call out, because their complete bs right now the talking point is being handed to the Democrats. Met gate said: Congress shall have the power and what happened. People are actually tweeting the carpet duncombe. I will never vote form again. You'll do you. People say the only thing it complex was a give Democrats talking points. No, that's you.

As you they're, using what you're saying to accuse trumps base of being a strict called that no one can defy for any reason, and that's been them. You know what man it's you know, it is frustrating the Woke twitter body and far left have played this period test game of such incidents and an absurdity they have called Barack Obama. Conservative don't give them this talking point. Let people within your party crossed the line, sometimes to prove it but you know what it that's. The case then accept that I'm wrong, but I would I do that it is fair to point out and nature. I stress this car by doctors. Tweet was not ratios, it stands to reason most Republicans and conservatives. Actually agree and recognise that met gates, voted out of line, and it's an ok thing to do and that met gets is one of the biggest defenders of Donald Trump on Principle and that's that and you know what that guy

It's here what meant what Matt Gates did actually says a lot. In my opinion, it says that all of the times he's back trump it's been because of his principles and one is principles were challenged. He chose to defy tromp. That means he is not a traumatic event. It means that the things you to find a trump on our things. He truly believes- and this is your- this was a perfect gift met gates- was giving two trumps base to prove the Democrats wrong. How many times has the woke laughed? The far left in the Democrats done something where you ve laughed and been like. No matter what you do, it's wrong. You must bow and Ben then this is the opportunity to say that's not the case with our publicans, but unfortunately, at least in some circumstances it is. Can I stress, I still also handed to note a carpet aunt em too met gates because it looks like most people actually agreed

probably agree with what a lot of what I'm saying, but there are people who are probably dislike this video and say no, he defied the president whatever well, you know what to bed truck, not Donald Trump doesn't doesn't deserve a bet me and allegiance. Donald Trump deserves to be right if he's right period and if the executive branch is overstepping its bounds, Congress will check it. That's the point: I love it. You know one of the best things that Trump has given us is. The is the

telling of executive authority, because under Obama expanded rapidly without without qualms Nancy Pelosi says, Obama does need approval because every once under Trump there's been pullback. Nor do I believe Nancy Policy is actually acting, principally absolutely not. I think, she's lane to trap, but this to me proves that met gates has more integrated pinky finger than many many of the Democrats. All of these moderates right these, these thirty one to forty districts who voted for impeachment with no statutory crime because they were scared and Jeff Andrews only option was a say. I'm leaving the party them Matt Gates should not be traceable party here not lose his constituency simply for voting one time with a constitutionally grounded bill. So lessen the bill basically says tromp ass, to see, hostilities unless I get approval from Congress against IRAN. What's the problem literally, what's the problem, gay trust,

trot doesn't need to to look what happened right now. You need to understand was Trump acting within Iraq ok, now they're saying because the target happened to be iranian. That's the issue shore! Well, if Trump, you know, if trumped knew that, then he p shouldn't. Do that. Ok, ok, here. The EU and for Iraq was for the force of Abu saying, and I think it should appeals, but the two doesn't want aid enough is for general terror, and this guy was labeled by Obama. So listen. There's this bill, in my opinion, is stupid. Ok, I think gates is right and I think the general idea that Congress has this power is right and it is often said that its constitutionally conservative position don't fall for this trap men, because now you got the never tempers and you have the local of saying this is proof that trumps base occult, but it's not because carbon Duncan was not ratio as much as

you know, lefty Twitter is laughing. Saying get ratio didn't happen, carbide, anthems, followers, staunch tromp, supporters of one of the most epoch Mean Smith's, defining the president tend to agree. Many many disagree. You're, not responsive, saying now, because people are angry, but I think we are actually seeing as at most people agree met gates should be allowed to dissent wherever men, you do you. I dont care, I'm just I'm just looking for integrity and consistency. Aright swallow there. I think, Matt Gates is there's probably sums up. I disagree with a mandate. To be honest, a lot of the east. These worries talked about censorship, social media, stuff. I agree and I think I think I have tremendous respect for him doing this one of the biggest trump supporters and he had no problem coming on saying not this time. Men. I give you an applause without when I really do respect that Jeff Andrew tried that and they did they let him up if they from over the fire, and so he jumped ship. That's disgusting to me. I appreciate the Republicans giving it you know Trump willing to give a handshake,

Andrew and it's the issue. I have repeatedly said in my statement about Andrew that tromp has proven the Republicans are willing to accept descent if it means that can broaden their base, and that proves are willing to accept a diversity of opinions. Don't fall for that trap. Mexicans coming up P M on Youtube Outcomes, liked him cast news, and I will see you all their now the story takes place in Canada, so I want to make sure it's clear. I can certainly comment on a variety of laws in the culture of Canada. It is very similar to the U S, but it does look like. We have essentially a James younger to point out, though, that aren't familiar the James younger. It was about a seven year old, whose mother believe that he was transgender, whose father believed he wasn't, and the court battle or whether or not they would transition this child. The mother had one for the most part and James was now being called Luna undressing like a girl, but then do too a large public outcry, others haven't and Texas. Eventually, the father got joint custody.

A minor setting right now is that the parents have to make neutral decision, so James can go to school as James. I think it's important to point out a couple things as we know the story. First, let me tell you a story: is transgender. Teen has right to transition. Despite fathers, opposition Bcg appeal appeal: court rules in this story we're dealing with a fifteen year old, very different from a seven year old. I think it's important to point out in the James younger Kay, we're looking at you know the father, proud videos of a three year old being told, I believe three or four being by the mother, that they are actually a girl that he was actually a girl, and so there some concerns that the child never actually formed identity because they were constantly told conflicting things. You need to take a baby and keep saying you're a girl, kids, not gonna, know whether they are or aren't because your shaping their mind. So there is a real concern that they Kid was being sort of flowers. Groom Banal happy about what might get angry about that. But, yes grooms

you believe by the mother. Now that's one that concerns in this circumstance, you can call whatever you want, but there's a teenager and ones. Can the story is the mother is agreeing with the child in the doctors, the child should transition from female to take male hormones to become you know. Tat gentlemen, and the Father is saying: no. The court has now ruled against the father, but I won't we'll say this too You conservatives, who fought so hard and gender cases. Canada fingernail do anything about this, But we'll see I mean I'm not a big fan of you of allowing you know, kids, who have even gone through puberty, to decide different story. A fifteen year old and while I understand there are concerns about things such as rapid onset gendered is for you, you know what man it's a rock and a hard place. Transgender people exist and transgender youth, exist and was a big difference in a seven year old being told by their mother and a fifteen year old go into the doktor and telling you know that the mother and Father

these things, but I notice a major cultural issue and I tried to these things: delicately saw beloved. Let's what's the story, this is from the star dot com, let's let his job in a ruling, that's being hailed as a victory for transgender youth theses. Top court has reasserted the right of young people to undergo to undergo hormone therapy, despite a parents objection, but that didn't Friday by the provinces. Court of He'll struck down a lower courts, finding that the Father This was a case had committed quote family violence. By refusing to acknowledges teenage child chalk, teenage teenage childs gender, woe, Canada Yamaha CALM down little bit, they actually a court found it was violence because the Father would not allow the daughter to transition now on appeals. Court said man, hold your horses good good, like it's, not violence, ok, the file. There clearly has concerns about irreversible, just to his daughters life. I can respect that, but you got a mother,

father and doctors. There are fighting over this. They say the now fifteen year old team, had been assigned as female at birth but have identified as a boys and age eleven with the support of his mother and doctors? He wanted to start to stop strolled hormone therapy in the summer of eighteen, however, his father oppose a treatment and took the issue to court. In their ruling Friday, the three judges called the file this refusal to accept his son, shared identity troublesome the dispute has caused a rupture of what both parties refer to an otherwise a loving parent child relationship. The judges ruling said the ruling not include names of family members and instead uses the initials city to represent the father and eighty two percent, the boy. Quote the evidence shows that his rejection that his rejection- These identities has caused a significant pain but decision reads: he cleared wants and needs acceptance and support from his father. I gotta stop we can say a few things. We need to take the idea of rapid onset, generous Borg, discourteous seriously.

Because the resistance rates according to current scientifically separate journals is sixty five to ninety four percent, you that, but this is not for teenagers. Ok, we're making this clear. This means kids before puberty, who identify as Trans Sixty five to ninety four percent gives up its based on a couple different study, well revert back to their biological. You know their assignment they'll. Basically, disease will stop being trans, that's exe! the important thing in this instance we're gonna teenagers. What is a bit different, but now we get into the idea of rabbit onset, gender, this for your foes and are familiar is where this is the idea that social pressures are convincing young women, typically homosexual women who happened to be artistic too incision because they'll fit in better, and I think you know one of the big challenges

first, and then there have been studies that have pointed out that this is a real phenomenon, though they ve been challenged. I think you have to consider the power of social pressure. How many people amendment remember: Metro sexual, when, like No old, like late teenage young men, were dressing up like an acting like they were gay when they weren't and then eventually stop because social pressures- actually, you know, can have this effect. Also thing: it's really important to consider sort of the contradiction. Talk about. You know NBC part, a story saying that you know little boys are our children will choose, identity, male or female, at a young age, deciding on how they want addressing we're going to play with. But if it's true that social behaviors dictate gender identity. This would make sense, but simultaneously? Have the you know that the break the gender binary tat Bob people who are saying that boys can play with

doesn't mean anything and girls can wear. Panther doesn't mean anything, that's the case, then you have young people, particularly young women, who are not more wars. Probably artistic studies found who might wanna play soccer or play sports being told there actually men, because they like engage in traditionally masculine activities, so I not saying which ones right or wrong. I can tell you this year pick. Ok, because it can't be both. You can't Simon honestly say: there's no gender binary, but then tell young women. They should take hormones to change because chanters binary. Look, I get it it's it's it's complicated right because I say that all the time, let's freedom, but more abies lawyer, Barbara Findley Centre client was very pleased. The ruling quote this is a victory for Trans Youth, who are entitled to get the treatment they need. Even if their parents disagree, now. I gotta say this: two men. I think it's it's it's starting to become. What did that?

channels where we draw the line and when children are allowed to decide for themselves and when parents have jurisdiction. Imagine this way. Let's say the kid had cancer and the kid said I do not want chemo. Would the court's rule in favour of the child to say I do not want this. Frequent. Is it because they are receiving? It is like a positive, negative thing like if we get a cancer and said I wanted treatment and the parents had no, the court would absolutely allow the kid to get treatment. So is it a positive thing or negative thing not now my question comes to. The next issue of like body this morphia law. People might argue that are not the same thing and I think it's fair point out sure, there's differences body, just Morpheus when people it's a general term. That could mean you know. People who think there too any who think they're too fat, but there's also people its I've, always colic body, this more effect disorder, something where they literally want to remove body parts and they fake accidents to cause damage to like it their hands removes. Let me ask you a question: if a kid had severe does

morphia and was seriously depressed, and might you know back seeing their hand and demand ended, they get their hand amputated. Do you think a court would agree with us I am not saying it's a one for one argument: I'm asking about the new ones in everyone's gonna freak out right now: where do you think the line is in determining? a child should or should not be allowed to determine what their treatment should be so in this instance, where we're talking about treatment, not negative. Not withholding of, I think, that's where the line is drawn. I think most instances. If a teenager said I want this treatment, the courts would probably defend their right, especially you understand them or is agreeing with us, so the fathers gonna lose out those red. They say the BC court allow recorded initially ruled in favour of a teenager. In February. At the time, legal experts told the star the decision. My parents would need to respect their child, its chosen gender pronouns, a name and also set a precedent for transitioning youth across the province suggests.

Think that seeking medical assistance is a health decision and not a political or moral one that apparent can stop feeling riders appeal court decision does not change any of that. Action and a lawyer who specializes in family and anti violence law, but it stop short of upholding the lower courts assessment that the fathers behaviour constituted family Now that is insane you evidence suggests the father does not deliberately intend to harm his son. The judges explained the court of appeal who did issue new conduct order, stating that the Father must acknowledge and refer to eighty as male and employ male pronouns identify be by the name he has chosen to stop here. Ok, we're talking about treatments. This is going above and beyond. If a kid, wants to believe something or does believe something. How can a court order? I act a certain way now

we're getting crazy. I mean this is Canada, so you know how I don't think Canada has free speech emerald their rules. Are we have a constitution bless the hearts of the founding fathers were put not together, like a guy you're, not gonna. Tell me what I can't I can't say, and The court is is telling the father, they must now say words and employ male pronouns, use the male name, don't know than men, I can call you whenever I want to call you. I mean this. Is America Canada's different? I get it but listen. You come to me and you tell me, like you say your parents gave it JANET and you come to me and say my name is John. I could call you floor bo. If I want, I can call you whatever I want. I can call you stupid, but in Canada quarters ordered. You can't do that man Canada's crazy place. Look I'm I'm totally for respecting people in Kosovo. We want men I grew up and have a community. Everybody gives themselves we're names like everybody's, nay, a call sign. I mean technically

in that IRAN, our everyone's gonna Twitter, handle? You don't put back in the days at Youtube to screen name, and there are a bunch of hackers who don't go by their given names. They go by like a call sign, look upon name, they ve been themselves. I don't, I really don't. You can call yourself the floor before power where what what? What? What is it? What's the written? What recommend thing, however, Zappos Europe now care what you call yourself? Ok, whatever you want someone to call you I'll call you it! I dont I've got no beef. The issue comes kind of like with what we're Petersen was saying: could a court can a court order you to do this here? You go the answer is yes and what happens if he doesn't I gotta say that's gonna crazy. Look. If I give my kid a name, and they insist their name is like rage master. I'm still, gonna call him bill, nay, my kid on they. My kid, Jean ok forget the joke. Jean I'm gonna call Jeanne call yourself rage, master. All you want call yourself

psycho spinner. Aren't you make up whatever you want t bone HAWK master whatever you think it's cool you wanna, be a cyborg with a crazy. You know haircut. Do you think, but I want to call you when I want to call you not. I mean to me it's kind of weird that a father. Is being told out here we go and actually say that your brains out, let us read the count. Two orders also prohibit the father from expressing his opinion about his sons, gender identity to the media or any public forum. What's this nuts dude, could you imagine if your kid was like don't want a certain treatment for like this element? I have, or I do- and there are like you- can't tell anybody wow This is why this is insane. There's there it was actually Moxie Marlon Spike yeah. Could you not talk about hackers and crazy handwriting, because a hacker at an interview them while ago about why he supports, to a certain degree, civil disobedience and breaking the law,

why surveillance is bad. Here's what he said a match and you'll get like a pot laws right now, right he's like they're all getting repealed. Recreational is being legalised across the board and this was a legal federally for a long time. It was through people breaking the law that we figured out. This is something that probably should be illegal. In the first place, so with mass surveillance, there's literally no opportunity to test the boundary is because, as soon as you try, they common snatch you up this an interesting concept here because you get it Her stamina comes to express expressing the issues of risk. Yet we are not going to get to the bottom truly understand understanding, what's going on with with Transcend youth, if no one is allowed to talk about it, it will only flow in wonder Let me tell you a scary story. I read one of these scary things at a distance website where Trans people talk about how they feel manipulated, interact I'm not saying it's literally every transports of the forms exist. And someone said, because

only stories that ever make it to the public are positive. They had no idea the nightmare they were about to to encounter. I'm not saying it's true for everybody. This was their specific experience that a bad time. And they said they only heard positive stories and there needs to be a weighing up the pros and cons so that people can tell the truth people are saying like They were unsure of themselves in their family and friends were saying: do it do it do it? They were pressured by everybody and though they were to an extent this work they weren't convinced. You know they needed to take this. These medical intervention, but everyone around them kept talking, but how it would be you have tv, show saying its awesome and they did it and they regretted it. We need to be able to express how we feel about what's going on, so we can.

Make sure that bad things don't happen when the government says you are not allowed to talk about how you feel about this. That can only lead to bad dangerous things. This to me, is terrifying and psychotic. I'm sorry, look man, I'm totally and support. Of this fifteen year old, I think they're they're there beyond puberty, restarted ever real understanding of how they want to feel the mothers on board the dogs on board. I can respect all that I can and the dad's connected To reconcile! You don't want people get that I'm saying this, but I think it is right. This is we're not talking about us when you are talking about a fifteen year old located is a bit different and that there are issues of one of these. Doctors are totally understand that body, I lean a bit towards you know what man you, the mother, yet the fifteen year old, post puberty right, you got the doctors. The dad should be a lot of talk about. This data will be allowed to express the dad should be allowed to use whatever name. He wants and be very critical of this, and I think it's fair that a court would provide a ruling on it, but here that I don't try

I am concerned this ruling is unjust because there are not going to hear reality So maybe it's true. This fifteen year old is is a legit and the d amato. I'm I'm not going to intervene in a medical situation. That's the point right. The doktor then decision, the mother and the child. I get that. My concern is that this culture and these actions are being built around a system of suppressing information we ve, seen it from cultural pressure and we're seeing it now in Canada literally sang you can't talk about it, they tried doing Texas, gagging the father, I think he's gagged right now. Actually, that's insane! I do not believe that should be allowed. I believe that should be overturned. You win. We need to hear. We need to hear what they have to say. Could you imagine a future where there's going to be unnecessary, medical treatments and people all regret it, but their prohibited from talking about it. Right now we have the problem of cultural pressure. You talk about it a negative way. They come for you. I made a video

but the James younger Case- and you don't mean Motto, Spencer and I said to my friend right and I was How do you feel about this and I was told it sounds like you're, closeted, bigot and you're trying to doubts and, unlike what up calm down, I'm toes fence at our man I'm the one who's been like. Well, you know, I don't know, I'm not good enough. They said How dare you even say I dont know, and so what's going on, and if you can end up with kids, who don't know better, war can be pressured into something and then and it's gonna be they're gonna regret it for the rest of their lives. They say this the restrictions on the fathers freedom of expression were imposed, the aim of preventing harm to the sun, the decision red while of course see is fully entitled to his opinions and beliefs. He cannot forget that Ebby now, a mature fifteen year old, with the support of his mother and medical advisers, has chosen it course of action. That includes not only hormone treatment, but a lead after all. We are doing to make it worse. I'm curious. Now this judgment is, is going to impact future cases where

the judges comments around deliberate Harmon family violence raise concerns from legal experts. The suggestion that family violence requires intention could really limit the scope of how courts will could really limit the scope of how courts will understand their actual, be arguing terms. The others. Judgment is, is going to impact future cases where there is family violence. It's not family violence for concern, father. To think that his daughter is incorrect. I'm curious the others judgment is going to impact which cases Shannon who by the Pronouns day then set its proof, the court was not taking violence. Its trans you seriously enough dude, I hope you're ready for I psychotic and terrifying future. I'm not kidding Look man! I got no issue. If a doctor, a court and the mother and the child are all saying this. What we want to do. Ok, I think the fathers free expression should be protected and I respect the father trying to protect and do the right thing by his child. But if you're gonna come out now and be like, it was violence. Violence broke Father to be concerned about its daughter and not want militant medical intervention?

permanent changes for his minor daughter, your knots. This is crazy man sometimes you to make a strong declaration of unacceptable behaviour. That's right! If your child comes you and says I would like Ex done to me. You better say whatever you want, otherwise its violence and not making it Duration in many cases for marginalized people, affirms the status quo and it's ok to behave this way. I'm concerned, that's a statement to the court of appeal is taking here. Well, you know what men our private banned from Youtube in for it, because this is the way the games played. You're not allowed to be critical, you're, not a lot about what to call these things out. You know, PETE. These activists go on massive flagging campaign to this down. I'm sorry! Violence is when you directly cause harm physically to an object or persons, a definition that probably definition will take up with Miriam Webster the Oxford dictionary. But this is not violence. These people are insane, but you know what fine so be it

What's gonna happen. People are moving to the right like I like. I did my main challenges today. The Gallup poll shows that people are stop. Aren't are less likely to identify as liberal now it's because of this self. The progressives want to embrace the limiting of expression and the expansion of the word violence. To literally be a dad saying, I'm concerned about my daughter are great, you own you own it. You know what men and if you want to stick around and beer, or that you go to your thing. I'll, tell you what regular saying people are going to wake up to this and they are and that's why the poll shows over twenty nineteen their shifting back into the direction you report you so now? I will end by saying is not about the daughter. Ok, the Trans, that that that the transgender male I'm trying to be respectful chemist come come. Some slack. If, if, if as individuals, many choice for their life and their fifteen, I think that there are other you another fifteen. This is not preview Besson. Ok, and if the mother is involved, the dockers are involved. Then, while I can reckon,

nice resistance. What would make me probably fond of some opposition to the dad sang? I don't think it's a good idea. I think you should wait. It's it's it's it's a problem. We have to sort out we're gonna have to figure out where the liners and I'll tell you right. Now, kids, don't know they dont. Oh man, you know it's really funny. I remember when I was eighteen and I had all these older people say You think you know everything, but you doubt I was really funny cause I was like, and these all people think they know me, and I got older, really dead and young people Are they really dont? Because I Didn'T- and I laugh now and I'm like yeah, but I don't think anything you can do. I really don't, because I remember, being young and having them tell me I didn't know everything I was full of myself and I was again, whatever old man, you think you know about her. There was nothing anyone could have said to convince me that I wasn't just being smart, ass and now that I'm older on like wow didn't know anything. So maybe just takes agent wisdom, and I think

the challenge we are facing here because we're talking about permanent and semi permanent actions that will dear life in and serious ways that people might come to regret and assistance is massive among transgender youth. The region, I'm I'm leaning towards, like. I trust the doctors on this one I'm I'm more likely to- is that the decision? rates as far as I've tracked? Our four previous essence? So this is a fifteen year old. Ok, it's very different somebody who's already going through puberty and experiences and is is So, while I'm nothing is perfect and it certainly no possible here's, the challenge: do you do nothing or abuse do do something at us. At a certain age, there big there there's, there's no permanent changes, and this is one of the big arguments that I'm not qualified to actually talk what I am qualified to say as we cannot allow courts to restrict the freedom of expression. We need to be able to talk about this if I get banned for doing so.

So be it. I got a new show come and by the way you took the council s Tomb cast IRA, we're going to talk about the multi verse of men is doctor, strange, the New STAR Wars movie and wild and crazy mysteries. Like that, you know, the Navy is talking about ufos and recently in Oregon. Balls were found completely examinating that mean stripped of all of their blood and dropped from a great height seem interesting, apolitical stories that I'm gonna have to bring my body up. We're gonna just talk and have fun crack some beers, because sometimes two things this stuff, it's heavy men, and sometimes I really just want to talk. About aliens are something silly, because this is melting. My brain, but also I fully expect to get banned for talking about not things and saying ideas that well the thought police. Don't want me to say so it's real struggle. I will admit trying to figure out how to keep business going talking about important things when I say

Time and time again, I am getting censored across the board so Channel number three technically for, but I don't run subversive versus editorial in it, and by TIM cast iron I'll, make sure you subscribe. I've got some people coming out. There's gonna be two new people on prior, it's gonna, be my body probably or be very similar to what I already do, but my buddy, Adam is likely coming out and he's more of a layman, gamer type layman, as he's like not politically active. Oh, what we're not willing and targets up we're gonna talk about you know, movies and music and freaky is interesting. Stuff. We'll talk about just like entered national aliens in like a weird weird things that respond fun talk about, and gotta be more of like up like a chill relax alike, are inventing at all So I do all of these crazy stories and I feel like man it is. It is brain breaking right like this probably made you angry. You problematic me reply like how dare you I m, not defend the father more. I wanted to tell you do not say this

Can I get riled up? We can all get really really angry. New show where, instead, you can sit back. If your pots mockery. Could smoke pot? Well, no drugs or bad dont do drugs. If you drink alcohol than you could and your old enough, you can enjoy mere turn it on chill out dear thing. There you go, I'm done I'll, see you at four p m. You didn't come slashed him cast my in general, we got some political news. Admittedly it is a really really slow period right now, so we'll see what happens I'll see you in a few minutes our Nazi wall like an hour or never out of Veal law jest Labour elation. Fine in history, a ward goes to CNN. There are being offered to pay seventy six million dollars and back pay, I guess for violating labour laws these me to put it but here is that you will understand to be there or some contracted technicians that we're unionized and seen in fires that actually, let me just read this

I did a bunch of other news about cable networks. I wanna get into account or a commoner rang out. I want to solve the wound a little bit on CNN, so this is from the National Labour Relations Board own website, saying Siena Seventy six million dollars in back pay the settlement is the largest monetary remedy in the history of the nl or be full disclosure. I have gone through two different remedies: the Vienna lobby. Thank you, Anna lobby. As part of the settlement, signed a scene and has agreed to pay seventy six million dollars and back pay the largest monetary remedy in their history. The national labour relations boarded the back pay amount larger than what the agency collects on average in a typical year is expected to benefit over three hundred endeavour, was the dispute originated into doesn't three when seen and terminated a contract with team video services, a company that had been providing CNN video services in Washington DC in New York City after terminating the contract CNN hired knew him

I used to perform the same work without recognising or bargaining with the two unions that it represented. The tv s employs CNN, sought to operate as a non union workplace and conveyed to the workers that their prior employment, employment with tv S, anyone affiliation, disqualified them from employment, and there is a great mistake I would like. Let them. Let me finish as an auto union story, because I've been this twice after a lengthy hearing into doesn't eight administrative law judge found at sea and its actions violated the national, our relations ACT, and that The union was a successor to, and joint employer with Tv S in twenty fourteen, the analogue be agreed, ordered sand, a bargain with the unions and provide back pay later and one seventeen a panel of the Deasey Circuit Court of Appeals, included chief judge, Merk, Garland, Woolmer Garland and then Judge Brett Cavanaugh. What's this is like an all star cast of CNN Cabinet and grown adopted the majority,

of the boards findings and enforced the board's order that CNN cease and desist from refusing to recognise and bargain with the union's. However, the court demanded the board's joint implore employer finding for further clarification, along with the issue of back pay for further consideration by the board. After the case was commanded. The parties agreed to resolve their dispute through the board's alternative dispute resolution programme. Since then, numerous board staff have work diligently with all concerned parties to reach. Today. Settlement General Council, Peter, be robbed, noted, sentiment, diamonds, the board's continued commitment to enforcing the law and ensuring employees who are treated unfairly, obtain the monetary relief ordered by the board. The parties are the national Labour Relations CNN, local, eleven local thirty one The National Association of Broadcast employs and techniques. And communications work as America. Let me tell you some stories. I might I might dive in some other issues- cable, neat, cable, tv, news, news by things about time we talk about union, see. I had worked for two different companies

that had done some shady dealings and it the National Labour Relations Board that actually protected me in both of these circumstances and they both involved campaign. Fundraising, now. Let me talk about what's goin, because a lot of you might be saying why can't scene and fire somebody and believe it or not. You can't. If it's because of union efforts so I'm gonna do I'm. In order to avoid, I think a gag coordinate might still exist. I have to avoid saying certain proper nouns, but I was once working for company that was shorting. My paychecks and see many of you may not know this, but I am in fact mixed race and a part of that mix is korean. Somehow I'm good, ass. I am joking by the way, but I am, and so when I received my paychecks and they were shorted easily noticed. I looked at it, unlike that makes no sense. So I went in talk to my boss and said: go there's like fifty bucks missing

and my checks run a couple hours. You understand this big deal when you're like ours, I, like twenty, twenty one, and so went on that. Our mistake will fix it we're. So sorry, it was an error on our own. We got a punch in number and I would call a problem. So I come back that come then I say no new Czech printed and it was still short like fifteen or sixteen boxes, something granted again, I was living with some bodies. I was twenty years or so big deal for an economic two hours from my weak right, and so I asked my friends I was like: did you? let me see your paychecks and I looked, and I said, show me your numbers, because this fund raising the commission itself and sure enough. Everyone had been short, and so I started I started complaining the boss. They immediately apologized owes a mistake. Again they caught our south and now we're up now we are broken even but when we we're leaving we saw someone we never seen before and we asked them like. Oh you re going

I'm working on it. I know I used to work here and we were alike cool. We outward we're tail. What's up, Ngos they only money. They never paid me that much at my checks were short now went no way dude, they ve been shorting everybody, so I went Bodies- and I said, do we should we should talk to like the national labour, wrote lessons board about what we can do to protect ourselves, because they keep doing this. I think we should discuss uniting won't. Fortunately, the way the union law works make literally no sense as far as I'm concerned. That's why not a big fan of unions. We are basically told they can join one of the establishment, major unions and cut them like the money we're missing our paycheck would go to them anyway. I'm like, what's the point on trying to start losing money, not pay due to a major. You know organization as far as I'm concerned, but we were discussing it and we had. There was like very few employees, so we basically have talked Vienna larvae, their advice and what to do not affect ourselves and sure enough.

This company was so stupid. What are the one of the bosses gets flown out to deal with it is an amazing store out. All of us. Brings us down the hallway and he says something like you know all this stuff you're talking about with. Like you, in and like paycheck, it's really bringing people down and immediately one of my bodies who, admittedly, too bright if he adds up sameness, I'm like a name. I gotta avoid certainty, just start screaming and he's like you, donors to us where joy they require fires, because a guy like you were going to, let you guys go, and so it's me into other friends. What do the one friend is? All hot headed me screaming, swearing and pointed the guy, and it's like you know that mean where the Ladys younger the cat was basically like the guys like new like and then my friend was the when holding her back and he was. I do chill, do chill and then I yelled out- and I said you know his name- stop quiet, and then I told my my

and get him out, and I look at the boss, and I said so. Let me get this straight. What you're, explaining to me right now is that Europe set that Our discussions about our union zation efforts is making you upset, and so let us go and he goes no no You could put you putting words, my mama sort, this out what I said, and I said as far as I'm concerned, you told me you didn't like us talking about unions in another that's not what I said. That's not what I said, and I said, have a nice day The first thing we did was: we walked over the Anna Larvae when side told an exam. Though it happened and they said will file on your behalf, and I thought we would actually do something to stop them and that's why? I don't like any of this stuff. It's why I'm not a fan of hunting and systems work. I do like collective bargaining, but ultimately I'll say this. I technically one day it was for months, I believe on for months where we didn't work anymore. We had swede, told them exactly what happened they printed it all out

affidavits between the three of us work were really basically the same thing, and so they said three different people all saying. Basically, the exact same story did their corroborating. What and they basically got fired because we're talking my former union, they went to the company and the com many basically sad will see you in court at the very least, when they said we will agree to retro pay. And so here's rounds of happening. I ask them: will they pay penance, like is this going to stop them from going in the future, and I was essentially told no, no it's yours, it happens. There's not going any punitive damage. There's not going to be anything to stop them there. There's there's no penalty for what they did they're going to pay you. So you don't ever worked our gun, because if you win this fight, you know happens, we can get your job back and I said, but this is tiny office. This guy, like he's gonna hate, our guts and they're gonna, find any reason a fire and it don't worry, we'll be illegal if he did. That, unlike openly, is he's going to claim that we weren't in uniform he's gonna.

Way that we said something where we can do some again and they were like well, we can pay you for months back pay which turned out to be several grand, and I was like we technically when we technically one, we lost our jobs, we did nothing wrong and that's what, like the stuff. Ok, so it's funny right that sea and I now have to pay seventy six million dollars and back pay when its back pay you. That means These guys are getting paid. What they would have been paid this this this this union is not penalties. This is what set us in ten years of what would have been paid out to them anyway, and it's probably a bunch of employs I'm willing to bet. Yes, it positively great. The great seventeen years other pay. They probably they live their lives there, all of their families, often they're going to check for a hundred grand or something, maybe maybe a little bit more per person, but they're getting what they were owed. There's gotta be a policy for CNN Cnn Pang. What they would have paid out over seventeen years admittedly, paying all that at once. The last minute probably is bad foreseen and x

but in fact the CNN two billion dollar company there's no retribution, there's no penance. This looks like a big deal. Many people laugh and say how ha ha CNN. You had to pay a mortal and people tweet about it, but guess what this is rounding error for CNN. Ok, what do that? What they met in profit, like billion, like twenty billion or something of the actual profits, are most people saying. Cnn is a massive corporation owned by an even larger corporation. They eat this kind of money and they don't care while never get at sea and on us to pay the largest monetary remedy, and they really and allow be their not being penalised in any way. So I'm glad these guys. One gonna be. I'm shows a lot of people who are happy that CNN propagating comeuppance, isolated, really funny that CNN, businesslike Orange man, bad network, but they're, really just a big. You no problem pro Ganda Machine, for you know: hating tromp they're not really laughed aloud

Claim that note there really hours there there their corporate crony corporate Dnc, whatever so you're, not really paying a penalty they're paying what they would have paid anyway. They have a nervous, thin veneer of actually caring about progressive values, but they do want to products in the end. They will lie cheat steal same as any other massive conglomerate. Whatever I was There was some stuff I want to get into. I wanted to point out that, like while this is happening Fox at its highest view. Worship and network history, unlike ratings, are through the so, you know we can sit here and glow about CNN, but there you go there. Story about. You know these victories locked up. The point is, you can look at the store about the fine and they they d do pay to like a big victory. You know a defeat for CNN right in reality. I dont see it that way. I appreciate the Adobe. Does there s, another story live another story about how they helped me, but in the end,

that really happens is the people who are some like you're supposed to get paid. Ten grand congratulations. For months later they will pay the ten grand. So you spend four months of your life and what do you really win now? Put it this way. Final final thought these guys move at a certain point. Ok, they got new jobs that one of the family I now see another has to pay basically twenty years of back pay so that that's great I'm sure these guys are happy for it. So CNN they're, not the only ones to do this now you go there's just seen and stars. They're gonna get a couple more segments coming up in a few minutes, and I will see you all shortly. Young millennial. Men are losers with their major operate. There you go thanks for hang out, you can follow me not just getting all the story. Actually is women overtake men as the majority of? U S? Workforce data reflect growth in sir industries that employ higher numbers of women, but I know another story because the bigger cultural issue that I think we should all about, I'm being somewhat facetiousness amen are losers, like I tell you guys, I think you're gonna start your own business

So there are a lot of you who watch you are probably unemployed. I'm I mean this with with empathy and respect, you can figure something out. You do something figure, You know, I know I've been criticized. I told you, gotta go widdle, sticks and too little statues and sell them on the street, but I really do mean it. Man go pick up, rocks cell rocks the people giving the store, but the guy who sold a pet who traded paperclip for a house, a marketing human door to door. Maybe it's an urban legend of the point. As a paper quit you when someone storms had what will you give me for this? Paperclip is doing an experiment and eventually ended up trading up to a point where he eventually got house. Here's the point, There is something you can do you know the journey of a thousand miles begins with a single footstep now the news we have women. Overtaking men as the majority, the Workforce- and I think the reason is men- aren't working. We know it You know you know the feminist sang, patriarchy, patriarch yeah, but come on man. Young men are

the school there not getting jobs, and then we have the story, unemployment is prompting men to consider traditionally female jobs, so this might be a victory for feminist ass or you can argue that once again, the patriarchy is displacing women in the workforce, because men are taking jobs like nursing now, because on imports, I don't know what their argument is: unemployment really low, but if partly due to the fact that women, are now working more than ever more than men and men are taking jobs that traditionally wouldn't take technically that's good for Donald Trump, because before men wouldn't be willing to work some of these jobs now that they are willing to work, it is going to make trumps numbers look better, so there's of there's a victory for Trump. Thanks to the minister that I guess anyway. Here. This is the story I really want to. Focus on. Men are no longer there, nor any of the. U S workforce item that significant, because you know it used to be that men were the overlap.

Majority. Basically, the only ones who did work and then you had feminism and women started working and now you have more women than men working, so feminists. We're done right, you one is it over now. This is what this is bad news for man, and I think it's important that you know a lot of these feminists. Don't recognize this. They should because feminism is supposed to be about equality and the gender is right, but it's it's a dozen. Focused on this kind of things that if you have either gender failing, male or female, then you're going see serious problems in your society and, right now, men are school there's a bad think, a school stupid. The real problems are not working through the story from the Wall Street Journal. They say Women held more; U S, jobs than men in December. For the first time in nearly a decade, a development that likely reflects reflects the future of the american Workforce. The share of women on payrolls, excluding farm workers and the self employed

he the share of men in December. For the first time since made twenty ten Labour Department, Data released Friday showed women held fifty point, o four percent of jobs. Last month, surpassing than on payrolls by a hundred nine thousand quote the report strongly suggests that the labour market dynamics are tilting in the direction of women die. Priscilla S. Chief Economics, economist and our I'm! U S said in a note to clients, we all often look for tangible evidence of change. Now here and the data and can be used as a benchmark to measure equality and inequality in the labour force of economy, feminists, women, you're not doing enough to protect the marginalized community of Young men who are not employed men are not in schools are not working. Therefore, they are the margin. Eyes group. Not only that women are what fifty one percent of the population, I think it's safe to say that men are now and oppressed. Group am joking, calm down on being diseases, all the feminist, just our shores in a collective shriek, the gap between men and women on payrolls,

been narrowing over recent years, reflecting growth and service industries that employ higher numbers of women, such as healthcare, the sectors that are growing like magic, and health care are predominantly women's employment. Said Oriana Haggis, Hegel, which programme director of employment and earnings at the Institute for women's policy research. Look, the twenty first century. It is really amazing how profound some of these segregation in the labour market profound. It really is amazing how profound sum of segregation is in the labour market in number the education and health services sector added thirty, six thousand jobs compared with the prior month. Both of those industries are predominantly female, but that's why I brought thither story that men are taking those jobs. Meanwhile, the mining and manufacturing industries down into my men, lost a combined twenty one thousand jobs

the last time women out number two men on non non farm payrolls was during a stretch between oh nine and twenty ten, but different circumstances drove the trend at the time, because the construction and manufacturing sectors, where disproportionately shedding jobs according to the Baker, Senor economist at the center for economic research, economic and policy research you had too large. There is the economy that were very badly hit by the recession, whereas right now we would think of being a pretty normal economy. In fact, it is a really really good economy so that is really really bad news from an sorry. Sorry, man, it's bad news. If the economy is doing better than ever, and women are now outpacing men, we We really do make sure we maintain that parity. We want true gender equality, and we men women should be working in equal numbers and we don't make sure you know what I mean to track that. Admittedly, though, I don't really know what you do, if I think we have a cultural problem, a law, and it is actually no change this the issue as guys you need to go, get jobs. I guess

I mean unemployment down. There's jobs going to talk about their pen six figures. I hear a gap in the Labour This participation rate of the or the share of Americans who are working or looking for work persists between men and women. The labour force participation in December was fifty seven point. Seven four women aged sixty enough compare with sixty nine point. Two four men aged sixteen. So while of course a lot of guys who wait that wait, wait! Wait! hold on. That means there are more men working, so is what how does it makes sense that the story of cancer based on our seven makes sense if they're saying Labour force, participation for men is nearly seventy percent, but for women in cities. Please understand a reason. The number should be inverted whatever, but now that we ve talked about that, we now have a crisis of masculinity. Actually don't thinks I'm I'm kidding I don't think it matters of adieu and want to be a nurse or otherwise out. Something is a big deal, but it is happening. Forbes reports, by considerable changes in the labour market, there remains a clear divide between male jobs in areas such as security and construction and female jobs such as,

nursing and increasingly teaching. While this divide as law, Julie, persisted a new study from university. North Carolina Charlotte suggests that in times of unemployment, a growing number of men are thinking of crossing. The divide is important as labour market stats high the shrinkage in traditionally male dominated work sectors resulting in higher instability in the career prospects of men across the country. Need labour force. Participation rates have been on the decline for men in a wide range of fields. What's more these treaties, Finally, female jobs are those predicted to have the highest job and wage growth in coming years, so this is just it just makes sense Now I know it's a middle. You gonna be said: men are being forced into feminine positions and losing traditional jobs. Perhaps perhaps an issue I don't know. I think It's good. I think what we're really saying is that peat that the opportunity for work and unemployment is so low men are actually taking whenever jobs are available.

And I think we might overemphasize the cultural ramifications. I think we're we're really saying is not necessarily feminism You're, really seeing as trumps record economy and I mean big people- are competing for jobs to such a degree that we have store that their data taco bells now offering managers six figures that some shops are offering forty work weeks. That way are generally going up the letters one admit it because it would disprove all of their narratives. It would disprove not just economic factors which they need to counter because they want to win the election, but it also proves we don't need this feminist, tough anymore right, listen, there's a lot of reasons why feminism like legitimacy makes sense right now, but I'll tell you this if right now, you have more men taking traditionally female jobs, unemployment is really low. Wages are growing up going up, this disproves or a disk a lot of the activism towards the left. Now perhaps they can say, oh notes, Because of us? Congratulations you! When you're done, you can stop an hour it if women are more likely to be in the workforce.

And then congratulations. You won right once they have won. What do they really have? Well, the problem because they need to maintain a victim status in order to continue to push their politics. If they stop here, they dont have domination, they have parity, they don't want parity, they want domination. This news is bad news for the international ideologues. The fact that men are working feminine jobs proves hey. You want you're done. Congratulations. Men are crossing that the traditional gender barrier The fact that women are now the majority of Us Workforce- congratulations: feminists have taken over ah they're, not the matter. You see he owes you say: ok, ok, but at a certain point can we say that right now, if we, if we're a track into the future, women are dominating the workforce and now- and it is our focusing on men- take a look at colleges as well. Men are less likely go to college. That's not good news. We don't want, we want, we don't marginalized classes right

you want to prevent the formation of oppression right now that women are the majority of university graduates. It's probably times are creating programmes for men right now, you'll see If you'll find this, that they'll say no they'll say men are wine either complaining or they'll say it's our turn now and that to me is truly the scariest thing, but what I've heard so much from from feminist and the farm? Is that the pendulum swings, and now it is our turn to me. We can have if the pendulum swings, it'll swing back and if you accept a hard swing now, don't be surprised when its wings back dramatically the direction. How about we stop, and we say: let's focus on you, know, maintaining parity and accepting when you ve won, but but but in my opinion, the general drive of a lot of what we see from the far left isn't isn't really about we're talking about.

They're not actually trying to make sure we are in the workforce or graduating. I think they're really trying to do is push a more far left agenda and they're not done there not there. Yet they dont want to stop that equality. They want dominance, so they can't accept these kinds of stats because it proves the oppression. Narrative is, is dying, its defunct and now we need to start the great congratulations, the pendulum swing into party, the direction we gotta stop it. Now. I don't want you so I ll leave it. There also point out women we're taking man is really about the service industry, so they'll naturally pushed back on that. I think, to a certain degree, it's fair, but. If you only track the problems faced by women, you'll never actually gets you. No true equality, if you're, if you're, not fight for women working in sewers and dump trucks than you're, not really fighting for equality I think it's fair to say that feminists com, a region when they want to sit in a cushy, urgent, can see Yo Office, the coroner office and a skyscraper. But I don't

I'm running out Screechin about how their not being garbage man or working in construction. So I think it's fair to criticise. You know women should be advocating for the draft that serious right. If men can be drafted, women should fight for that equality. But you only see people fight for privilege. I don't know I'm not going to spend too wrap it up. Here I got one more Simon. Coming up in a few men stick around. I will see you all shortly. Did your vase gave a famous tongue lashing to the Hollywood celebrity elites for their foe activism and said come up. Get Little award and half off, because you know nothing about real world works, and I if what he said could be no, but exemplified than good Petros goop. First of all, awful name, a majority mean ok, good Paltrow. I got no beef, other I'm going to call you a weirdo right now because of a company called group which is actually being dragged news, particularly funny. I want I want to show you this, but what if Paltrow is a candle that quote smell,

like my view, is a family friendly, chair, to annex that's, why can't say certain words, but she sells a channel, a candle that smells like her genitals. This may be one of the most absurd and disgusting things I've ever heard, but I'm not surprised because Hollywood sub celebrity types literally have no idea how the world works and are quite insane. You ask me this is nuts: let's read the story from people, and then I want to talk to you about how insane, when, if Caltrans Company, as they say, a candle is selling unwanted Petros goop online store that has a very unconventional sent. The forty seven world actresses company is currently selling seventy five voted cheaply named. This smells like I'm ivy. According

A listening on groups on a listing on goops online store per the product description. The item made by artisanal fragrance brand heretic started as a joke between Perfumery Douglas Little and Paltrow when they were collaborating vagrants fragrance together. They were testing sense and then politician, star blotted out that smells like a v. The website said it, so it is a joke K. I get it. I don't think they like actually sampled bodily fluids, while the two didn't end up bottling the funny gorgeous sexy and beautiful, unexpected sent into a perfume they did I think it would be part as a candle description right. That's that sounds disgusting. There are literally jokes about that smell, not pleasant. Why would you sell this? U weird people according to goop the branded a test run for the candle dirt the group health summit and its sole that with an hour's. Yes, I wonder what what kind of person would by that

there are certain websites you might find where this might sell better than others, and basically like saying people or buying this far apart part. First specific personal reasons, males, it for personal reasons, Tino take with them into the bathroom to like feel good. If you don't I'm saying the candle centres ascribed to contain a blend of geranium secrecy. Bergamo and cedar salutes juxtaposed with a mosque rose and Ambrosch seed. Really, however, this is not the first. This is not the first power has been open about her private. In twenty sixteen, the asker when a revealed she has experimented with v steaming. I can't believe I'm thing is: I went on us while sceptical at first she admitted she was later hooked on the beauty. Treatment Apparently there is like a big important. We told him not to do. This is like bad for you, but I'm a dude so far, be it from me to tell women what they should be doing

I also know most of you watching are not women anyway, but those there are. I defer to you on whether on any does not make sense. As with guys, I'm sure there are lots of men equally cringing at the thought of the candle and many others looking at the online sort of purchase it for certain self gratification needs. The first time I tried these deeming I was like this same she told the cut my friend my friend Ben brought me, and I was like you're out of your effing mind. What is this, but then, by the end I was like. This is so great that I started to do research and it's been in an inquiry amazing for thousands of years, and there are real healing properties, Paltrow added time that is a huge fan of testing new treatments. Treatment do They are her. Lifestyle brain is currently set to launch a six episode series on Netflix called the goop lab, which will feature the star and her team exploring unfamiliar help treatments, and now I bring you to the greatest of the great goop dot com.

One morning now. Many of you may be aware that, for all of my sentiments, I rely on a third party company called news. Guard new start is pretty good they're, a it's, an extension that you can get for your browser. That warns you. If you a website with a bad history. Now I think, they're biased they give you know star across the board some sites and access across the board somewhat some sites that I disagree with, but I use them for a reason they tend towards being right, and I can agree with a lot of issues I dont like. I do think they will we'll bias in that they are more likely to drag a conservative commentary site than they are a progressive commentary site. I have seen in the daily beast and other sites put out overtly fake news and their rated good across board, but the daily wire out a few hyperbolic and their rated good across the board, but the daily wire puts out a few hyperbolic opinion pieces and they say no guts out criticism for that.

Nearly violates basic standards of credibility and transparency. They have given it nine out of ten red x is the only thing it gets right is it it doesn't this avoids deceptive headlines and what that means is, while the stories themselves may be false content, the headlines, art click, Betty, rob a goop. You got one thing right, since what we can do, we can pull up the goop tab, for news guard and see their nutrition label where they explain or accept cookies. I agree to your terms: they explain the credibility of the site now. This is important because Netflix is going to be running a fake new segment. Let me take. They say the left. Doesnt fall for fake news. I'm sorry. This is literally like, like passive leftist, fake news, Conservatives are not, for the most part, no into goop and read and raving about the healing properties of crystals and steaming their junk. Ok. This is primarily like yoga Happy millennial type thing we're here is what this is important: I'm gonna region

because one of Petra is full of it and they ve been sued and their running a netflix special. The credit Letty, according news dark, they say Group, has been used by medical professionals, advocacy groups and government agencies of promoting and selling products and a site that have adverse health effects or our falsely advertised. In September, twenty teen goop pay two hundred and forty five dollars to settle a lawsuit for false advertising filed by the California at food, food, drug and medical device taskforce. The taskforce found that goop products, including jade and courts, female private eggs away and a mixture of flour essences were advertise with medical claims not supported by competent and reliable sources. According to the Santa Clara County District Attorney's office. Announcement about the settlement, a goop spokesperson, sat in a statement at the branded not admit any wrong doing as part of a settlement. As of November twenty two

None of the three products cited in the settlement were available on Google com and articles. Referencing them appear to have been deleted without explanation external articles, in twenty seven team group also took down from the claims about a product called body. Vibe step, vibes stickers, a product were already. We described as made with the same conductive, carbon, cereal NASA uses two lines space, it's so they can monitor and astronauts vitals during where to rebalance. The energy frequency and our bodies. Oh wow there there are some people having to drag on the be nice goop took down the claims after new ever tech, new site gives MOTO fact checked description with NASA. And report that NASA spacesuits do not have any conductive carbon material lining. Mark shell A former chief scientists at NASA Human Research division told his motto at the research supporting Snickers Health claims was bs and the logic doesn't even holed up in response to this moto goop state

As we have always explained, advice and recommendations included on group are not formal endorsements and the opinions expressed by the experts and companies we profile do not necessarily represent views of group. So you're basically saying we got some right. Impersonal lie to sell trash to people who had no idea what's going on when the plague on which all you want. The easiest way to publish fake news. Let me go to New York City, walk into a dark alley and find a homeless man and then he said there go one you're, all wriggling fragrant we're done. Why bother sandwich, and it was my sandwich, and I say no one will believe they're aliens in his sandwich and then it goes. But I'll tell you what Donald Donald Trump Donald Trump. So we ve sandwich O Donald Trump soldiers go on. Oh I'll, tell you why wasn't in the gardens pulls his head up? Like Beavis starts going like now Donald Trump. Now we gritty grandma, but there it is Anonymous source claims, Donald Trump grabbed his by breaking news,

no, the autumn resources and it turns out. You sat in front of a homeless guy, muttering about random sense for twenty hours, any finally strong together a few words. You could cramond a headline, Donald Trump assaults: young men. And then you have a real revealed the sources. So here you have good if Paltrow talking about we're, goofy nonsense and it's what they do. These wealthy woke celebrity types grab random people who are going to give them what they need to to look like they air to sell and its gross, I seriously hope it ends man. You know with the way internet is going with like the success. I've had an and hopefully maintained and a new show, I'm hoping we can build a new culture of I may we gotta be a bit more critical and cynical and hopeful in the future, we don't have celebrities pretending to care. We have celebrities calling out faint, crap and and and sang straight up while I'm, I dont, know everything about everything I empathize, but this

b S right now. We have a new industry that is fuelled by people who pull up stupid, quotes from stupid people and they, like its news, are given ample CNN wants a story lawyer for love partners. Claims ukrainian says Devenant has met with ukrainian and they ran that story. That's the game they play and they fall for the stuff. You know one of palaces make an autonomous any office fake crap, because all fake, like she sang a five hundred and sixty dollars skirt, so hopefully its rich people saw their own garbage back to them. I guess to court fight club selling the fat ass is now you got me, swear sorry, everybody! I know there might be some kissing, but he eat you invite what they would take the fat from liposuction and then turn it no soap insult to rich people. I hope that's so she fell into Gaza. Nobody was buying a torn forty dollar toe or Two hundred dollar printed crape skirt one hundred eighty three dollars rounded metal sunglasses who a four hundred dollars

Friday overall and a two hundred dollar solitaire one piece: a mall bag for twenty five. So you know what at least she's not ripping off the poor people. I hope I'm sure there's a lot of poor people who really do save for the stuff, though it breaks my heart, Nan thought by this crap that's rang out? We'll see you all tomorrow at ten, a m at Youtube outcomes lashed him cast lotta changes here then we'll see what goes on you, whatever podcast Everyday six, thirty major check on.