We ve seen many videos of twitter employs talking about their bias against conservatives, There have been many stories we're Facebook staffers reveal the platform is biased against conservatives. Now, on the surface we get by. This is bad. Your restricting access to public discourse for only one bullet affection and that skews public discourse to the far left. But, as we dig deeper, it seems like this might actually be back firing on the left, or at least the Democratic Party and may precipitate the democratic parties Ruction. Recently many of the top twenty twenty democratic presidential hopefuls endorse the green new deal, but the largest federation. Labour gains, denounced it where that disconnect come from It seems like, as the discourse shift to the far left, many in media, stop repeating these lies and democratic politicians it's true repeated, and this Extra the democratic base which, according to stories many times and CNN are actually fairly modest and working class. It would seem

democratic, are being manipulated into away from their own base. Today, let's take a look at the latest stories, many times and CNN they show us. Censorship is actually back firing on the Democrats, before we get started. I want to have a quick shudder to today's sponsor virtual shield, who helps make this podcast possible virtual shield is a virtual private network service that can protect your data from prying eyes. As you browse the web, you can find we more at hide with TIM dot com. But essentially there are people like hackers there. From its preparation that went, ragged even steal your data and a virtual private network like virtual shield, and help keep that data safe. Now I don't expect people to break into our homes and we ve locks on our doors and windows anyway, say miss before the internet, it makes sense to have simple layer of defence. So if you're interested

go to hide with timid outcome and you'll get forty percent off with their Easter special today. But now back to the story, the New York Times published very interesting data today, the story, the democratic electorate on Twitter is not the democratic electorate in real life, detailed look at the voters with the numbers to decide the twenty twenty democratic nominee in their first visual, they show us social media, this is how Democrats behave. We can see that there is a very large group of blue coloured people. And they're saying things like stack the court and the electoral college impeach Trump etc, but of a low that more than half it would seem, are grey they're not really saying much at all. This is what Democrats think their bases, like all of these conversations happening, they believe represent the will

of the Democratic Party but they're wrong. The next graphic shows us reality. The democratic electorate off social media and progressive activists make up a tiny, tiny fraction of the entire. Other Democrats who are more moderate or conservative, make up the overwhelming majority of the base. This is going to present a problem for the Democrats as they chase after these blue votes. Think about it lets say the Democrats succeed in getting every one of these blue people to vote for them they will lose. Eighty plus per cent of actual democratic base. They go on to say, Democrats who do not post political content to social media. Are more likely to identify themselves as moderates or conservatives. Fifty three percent of Denmark, seventy per cent of Democrats that are not on social media, so that political correctness is a problem, but again it

on social media to only forty eight percent. It would seem that the progressive wing of the Democratic Party is extremely active on social media and this is convincing the Democratic Party that's who they need to chase after, but it's just not true Four times shows us many more steps of other democrats how there are less likely to be white, less likely to be educated and less likely to say they become more liberal. There's a similar story over on CNN. The democratic electorate is older and more moderate, less educated than you think. Listening to job and you might come away with the sense that he is out of touch with the democratic parties electorate, which many believe is younger, further left and better educated than it used to be. Indeed, the parties voters, maybe all of these things, but as HUF posts, Kevin Robber, lard wrote the former president seem to be making a bat that there are still plenty of older, more moderate and less educated Democrats who can help him when the nomination, that might not be a bad bet,

one such and they say democratic party voters are more moderate, then very liberal, whether it be the exit polls gallop or the Pew Research Centre, there's no doubt Democrats are more liberal than they once were in the exit polls. For example, the percentage of democratic voters when and if, as liberal rose by double digits between the democratic mid term blow out of two thousand six and twenty eighteen still moderates and conservatives make up about fifty percent of all Democrats in twenty eight teen midterms. The exit polls founded moderates and conservatives made up about fifty four percent. Those who voted democratic views similarly put moderate and conservative Democrats as fifty four percent of all self identified. Democrats and independents lean democratic voters in twenty eighteen gala. Two thousand and eighteen figures had moderates as forty seven percent of all the herself identified as Democrats, and they go on to say, while those numbers may be true, according to acquaint pack poor people who identified as

we liberals were only nineteen percent of all Democrats and independence who leaned democratic, Let's break out of the numbers and simplify this quite a bit. The progressive wing of the Democratic Party are few and far between at least relative to the moderate and the conservatives. According to hit. Tribes, the initial data we saw from New York Times it's about eight percent of the: U S population that is progressive, but they dominate the conversation on twitter and other social media. Because of this we see the impact it has on journalism. This story, the other day from the daily wire, far left activists Democrats media spread deceptively edited clip of Trump calling. I must thirteen gang members animals now this is a specific story, but it exemplifies this phenomenon in the story, we can see that far left activists in accurately spread this video, where tromp was talking about S thirteen but claimed he was talking.

Asylum seekers. Kirsten Jello brand then claimed that's the case. Pete Buddha Judge also played into this narrative David Haug and Tom, whereas many people were acting as though were true, even though the story is over a year old and was already hash out. We then see CNN Anna Navarro, making the similar false claim, and we The Amazon joy red, making this false claim people on social media are gonna, see those tweets, they're gonna hear that story, and it's going to further radicalized them. However, back over at the New York Times data, we see something very interesting in this section. It says Democrats who do not post political content to social media sites are more. Only to say they don't follow news much. Fifty nine percent of other Democrats. That means more than half of all people aren't following the fake news and they are hearing. These lies about Donald Trump. But what about the politically engage Democrats or watching the news war appearing on the news war?

active on Twitter to try to engage with their base there not only hearing the lies, but their engaging with them and repeating them as though their true in a graph from courts. We can see the divide growing between Democrats and Republicans, but something really interesting happens from the nineties onward from nineteen seventy. Until ninety we can see there was some overlap. There were even republicans more liberal than Democrats and Democrats more conservative than Republicans, but around ninety two that split broke and over time the median conservative moved slight late to the right. However, the most conservative element has actually retracted a bit in recent times, but look what's happening to, the Democrats, there is a massive swing to the far left that wasn't seen even two years ago, but now look the median Democrat hasn't shifted. It would seem that the politicians are chasing after this block over here on the left. By endorsing things

The green new deal, even though zero people voted yes for it, the median democrat is staying where it is because there are still much much more moderate and conservative Democrats who do not agree with the far left and Tom Perez. One of the people who repeated the lie about Trump said this last year: oh cause Yo Cortez represents the future of our party. That may be true, but it's also possible. This is based off of his skewed perspective. As he repeats lies about Donald Trump on Twitter, it seems like even Tom As Dnc Chair is out of touch with mainstream normal democrats beyond the regressive and follow up at a tyrians, Twitter has also created another phenomenon: Russia Gaiters, a sect of the Democratic Party that are convinced there is a grand conspiracy and that Donald Trump or others, and our government may be working for the Russians, something that people still will not. Let go

Even though the Mulder report was submitted, a summary was released or the quote saying: there's no evidence to suggest collusion or conspiracy on paraphrasing the quote. But at this point we are well beyond reasonable doubt there is no collusion, yet you still have msnbc pushing as hard as they can entertaining this narrative. It's not just the far left democratic socialists or identity. Carrion left its also the fringe conspiracy, Russia Gaiters, that are also fracturing the democratic base. This point was brought up by John Follow on Twitter. He said, read the whole piece, the outside can group of democratic leading voters on social media is outnumbered roughly two to one by the more moderate, more diverse and less educated group of Democrats, who typically don't post political content online Twitter has deeply deeply warped our sense of political reality and remember that's what is happening. Not what

happen. Political porters had pay attention to this too, as I've seen analysis pieces that attempts to depict political rally based entirely on musings from activists and pundits on Twitter, as opposed to voters. And organizations who aren't as online. And yes, I do this to now. Let's jumped back to this graphic, and let me try this spectacle. As social media companies restrict access to conservatives on these platforms for their various ideas, it would seem like there are less conservatives to restrain this far left group of Democrats that have entered the already. We can see lies repeated unchecked, as bubbles form and conservatives facing the censorship find other ways to coalesce around us of ideals. In fact, Fox NEWS is a really good example of this. There are very few large conservative outlets where conservatives can consume a media they're not gonna, watch MSNBC for the most part or CNN, and then you look at the growth of sites like the daily wire

and conservatives are mostly getting their ideas and their news from the same space on the left. However, their running well, on social media. While conservatives are there to push back and in fact, moderates aren't even really engaging politicians and media, then repeat, these lies and are convinced, they're saying the truth when in reality, moderate Democrats are just being completely left behind and that's kind of how I felt for a long time, I'm probably one of the rare moderate left, leaning individuals who was watching all this but willing to politically engaging speak up. The far left group on Twitter then tries to claim that moderate leftist centre left us are fringe right or all try to Jason, and it's kind of weird when I got any of my friends were almost entirely former Bernie supporters and left leaning

They are not engaging anymore, they don't care, they don't spend time on twitter and they don't get a twitter debates. This is left to the most politically active which, as long as these social media platforms are going to ban, conservatives will skew to the far left. Because even moderates aren't allowed to engage in certain conversations. Then your time story says this lower levels of news consumption mean fewer opportunities for the activist backed candidates. To make their case, a majority of such voters might not even have an opinion about Missus O Cassio Cortez, their weaker ideological predilections mean these voters are often less likely to buy the message, even if it reaches them. Of course, the Democratic Party has moved eleven recent years. It has moved far enough left, but there's Do you have room for a progressive candidate to win the nomination? It would be a mistake to dismiss Mr Santos chance of winning the nomination just because white progressives have generally falling short in the past.

The name recognition he earned a twenty. Sixteen will be an asset that prior outside our candidates, haven't been able to count on and so well his impressive small donor fund raising but it would also be a mistake to assume that outright John Social media means outraged throughout the broader electorate and it would be a must stake to assume more moderate Democrats are out of step with the parties electorate. No in fact polls show us Democrats are moderate, there are just not in vain, Often it is rare to see someone like me, who would alone if more moderate and centre left Democrats, not a big fan of the corporate Democrats by the way, the super in areas with somehow became millionaires in Congress. Don't get me started, but I lean slightly left and I'm politically homeless because in the mainstream discourse,

Moderate and conservative ideas are censored very often feminists even get censored for their ideas on twitter. When they talk about things like Trans ideology, this then skews politics in a direction that does not represent America. This is why, in the past, I've made the following prediction. I think Trump will sweep twenty twenty. There has been more than enough economic models and predictions that trumpets set for a blow out twenty twenty, but I think if we stay on this course, Democrats won't even be able to win a twenty twenty four we're seeing a civil war. The democratic party, moderate Democrats, refuting with progressive demo through an exploit with only sixteen thousand boats. Port has got elected through an exploit with only sixteen thousand boats and a district of over seven hundred and fifty thousand. This does not recent America. I so long as Democrats think it does they're, probably gonna, keep losing You think the commons below will give the conversation going. You can follow me on minds at TIM cast stage and new video, everyday work and eastern

more videos for you on my second channel Youtube outcomes lashed and cast new starting at six p m eastern thanks, rang out and I'll see you on that time.