Rachel Matter is being scrutinised after it was announced, she would be a moderator for one of the first democratic presidential debates. There are a lot of people saying that serve additives are criticising this decision because Rachel Matt, always conspiracy theories which she is she went on for years, about Russia Gate or that she's, just not a partial host, she's gonna be very biased. However, it's not all coming from the right is actually an article in news. We questioning whether or not she should be out, and even a journalist from the Washington Post is questioning. Whether or not she should be involved in this debate. So tonight. Let's take a look at what the critics saying, and then I want to show you some examples of why both left and right take issue with Rachel Matter before we get started had over the TIM cast outcomes flashed on it. If you'd like to support my work,

There are multiple options: there's a physical address that is nukes, we're we're opening up a studio, Crypto pay pal as well, and of course, the best thing you can do is just like and comment on. The video share the Lincolns subscribe because they gave it really helps. First from a daily collar, NBC faces flak for naming matter. A moderator for presidential debate must be the prime time anchor Rachel Matt. I was named Tuesday as one of the five moderators for the first presidential debate and its cause some commotion on the right, but I do want to add its it's not just on the right and surprising the daily collar would would would mention this when they actually have a quote from a media studies, professor at Nepal University. How are they going to say? her inclusion as a moderator is raising eyebrows because she's not viewed as an impartial host. Just the call a media studies professor at Depart University, told the daily collar. I think the voting public would be better served if hosts of opinion shows were kept out of moderating

pain debates, that's not to say that an opinion house such as mad, I couldn't generate helpful questions, but the appearance appearance is an advocate is helping to referee. The contest Certainly reporters also have their own values and perspectives, but the public normally expects reporters to come at any news event with some degree of objectivity. That is not the case for an opinion. Show such as up an opinion show host to dismantle and b c is, of course, trying to give their highest raided Emerson, be House and MSNBC host a promotional platform on this debate stage. I understand that, but it is unnecessary metal. Already has a high profile among Democrats. You also know that matter. Selection is not unprecedented during the GNP primary debates and twenty fifty and sixteen that multiple opinion based Paneless, including Hugh Hewett and Mary Catherine him, adding that their roles were rather limited, but they did participate on the panel. That was not a good idea either, and there was also Megan Kelly. The to night debate will feature

A maximum of ten candidates per night with each lasting two hours hold will be the only moderate moderator present from start to finish, got three India's Walmart we'll be alongside halt for the first hour and then be replaced by taught and meadow according to an and is fascinating. The Democrats would have one of the leading conspiracy theorists of the day moderating their first debate It really does show you where the parties at right now at net Ryan explains to the collar. Now, let me just will try, and I think the big issue is not. That matter is an opinion. How by all means bringing someone who's got an opinion to try and presents raising the issue is that she has a conspiracy, the arrest who, for years, published ridiculous nonsense. Ok and that's not just My opinion, I know, there's gonna, be a lot of people on the left were coming out in saying art interest going after the left, but listen. The left criticized Rachel mapped out for her coverage.

And their criticising her now, obviously, not everybody, but let's go over some of the critics statements first. Paul farmer. I would necessarily say he is left, but you know you worked for Washington Post and he's he's basically on the left. He's not like the craziest actor like manner. He goes on to say that they ve names. You know at the reach up Todd Rachel, Meadow and Jose Ds Bell moderators of the democratic debates like this month, but then he says Matthau unusual foreigner, indian journalist to moderate, closest comparison, Megan, CO, moderating republican debate and twenty fifteen him can over who ran, as I believe, her as a Democrat and then an independent, for I could be wrong so Rachel matter will no doubt will no doubt ask about russian collusion in first dammit presidential debate. Of course, you will only tools he gathered and MIKE gravel have questioned Russia gate. This will likely Ba The you test for both the establishment and anti establishment. Truth encourage versus she parting and smears, and then, of course, Michael Tracy

again saying: does anyone have the slightest doubt what issue debate moderator Rachel Matt? I was going to ask the democratic candidates about her presence me. The candidates are going to be competing to outflank one another on how tough they can be on Russia such a disaster. I completely agree with Michael Tracy. I Metals, gonna, do a better job and a lot of people think. However, she, gone on for years chasing this narrative and once the malaria Port came out her ratings tanked, her credibility was shot the story from June Third Fox it's a matter of credibility and writings at a low ebb following Mahler findings, critic say we want me to read end of the story. It's Fox news they're going to criticise Rachel Matt out their young Matt. I was probably the biggest competition for fox, although her ratings have been going down, so of course they will criticise or what they they're not wrong they're, not the only ones criticising her credibility. There have been met.

These stories calling her out since that the findings in the Mulder Report Port, how about the very left, leaning guardian, publishing this up at Will Rachel Matter facing reckoning over her Prompt Russia, coverage with Tromp has come to years of conspiracy mongering about Russia and at the top of the heat, is none other than MSNBC Matter, but you may be saying term: it's an opt out from the guardian. We know the guardian. Very left leaning, but maybe maybe this guy isn't but then we also have the nation, the nation is extremely progressive and they wrote this. The real costs of Russia Gate its perpetrators, not Putin or Trump. Tat american democracy and who do they criticise Rachel Matthau. I have to stress this because there was there was a segment she ran where she actually was concerned and scared that Russia would shut off electricity,

in the winter months, to a place like Fargo, for instance, and how dangerous it is because it wasn't just Russia collusion. It was Russia, Russia, Russia, believing there's this great for adversary seeking to abandon, destroy the? U S army at odds with Russia. Yes, we absolutely are Russia interfere in our elections. Yes, and many other elections as well is there are such things as the internet research agency? Of course there is, but for years to go on and even how could you not you and presented, and I want to say she claimed it necessarily, but she asked whether or not Trump could be working directly for let em your Putin idle. Care. If you want to have an opinion housed moderating presidential debate, I think that can be valuable, but why would you put Lady Alex Jones on you know on prime time cable, you know what what's really frustrating to me is the is the double standard

but I can appreciate at least you're, seeing someone like Paul Foggy, say: that's kind of you know strange, and I can appreciate some like Michael Tracy, though Michael Tracy typically does get it right, he's easier, defended, free speech is called out. You know that actors on the left and people like Rachel Meadow, so I can agree and here's the thing he's not wrong when he says we know exactly where Rachel Matt. I was going look at this story from this from, I think, from today, as from today, isn't it Rachel? I'll tell Seth Myers. The Democrats need to stop over thinking and impeach already, so this is from a v club just in case you were thinking. The national discourse was too darn, well informed and responsibly woody, Rachel Matt. I stop by late night to talk to the current political message admires well messes. As Donald troubles in the White House. The GNP is allowing a budding him in trampling over the rule of law and the separation of powers and them

sorry Republican Party is, as meadow pointed out straight up, forcing women attempting to get an abortion at the states, one remaining per I have to undergo an invasive and completely sorry exam before obtaining a legal and personal medical procedure right. We understand that. Let's talk about impeachment they say they say. Madame was drawn the short straw as one of the five moderating the upcoming to night ten candidates per night democratic debate. Double hotter, accept did condolences for all the attendant homework, as today, spinning number of candidates and the attendees debates over that elusive bug, buzzword, elect ability, now told Myers that, as Is there a way? Democrats, our thinking too much? Yes, because thinking much is always about then, comparing the over thinking going on at surrounding the arguments for and against impeaching a president whose every word deed and twitter irruption scream impeach this effort matter

urged Democrats to have a normal, healthy, hard fought campaign and then get down to work if you are doing it for the right reasons, I think you are more likely to persuade the country that you ve done it for the right reasons. Find motto of all the signature democratic, waffling going on in both air arenas, adding pick the best candidate who, you think would make the best present approach. Imp impeachment in terms of the constitutional imperative here as Myerst chime. Then there's no strategy that will keep Donald the toilet, twitter Trump from washing up he's not going to if he doesn't get impeach say you know what that was a real, fair shake. I got the Democrats I took my cat. Job Myers, so they might as well use impeachment inquiry to lay everything out for the american people. Agreeing that I said just do what you think is right, he's gonna call you names impeachment right, because that's what Americans care about they don't Russia rank like on the bottom. There was like those upon

dawn came over by who were they asked regular voters, Democrats what you are concerned about and guess what health care immigration jobs top three consistently the bottom was and one instance like zero percent Russia, so they want to impeach Trop. Why? But I'll tell you what that will what will? I will say this obstruction of Justice Shore Mauler, a sad that Russia did interfere and an annual is meant not making a determination on obstruction. Ok, fine! You want to bring up. I think it's a fair point and we definitely to hold the president accountable, but when you're entering this, arena putting Rachel Matter on this panel, I tell you will do one thing again to go back to what Michael Tracy said. She's going. Rail on Russia, call for impeachment and she's gonna. Just talk not talk about impeachment and what think Americans are going to hear. That's gonna be an american sitting on their Cobb saying. I need a job and the return of tv online

by Russia and impeachment and obstruction and undergo. Am I going to get a job man and then they're gonna turn on that? Then they're gonna see a commercial from Trump and trumps gonna say you condoms better than ever, we are bringing back jobs. We have just got MAX go to agree to it, as you know, stemming illegal immigration and they're gonna. Think well. That sounds like it'll help me get jobs. So here's the thing I want to make sure I stress it is not just conservatives. As I pointed out, there have been people who left criticising Rachel. Madam, but again it goes even into Newsweek NEWS. We is typically left leaning and they make great. They ran this article. Should Rachel man be moderated democratic, twenty twenty? I must not be seen not alone in choosing partisan house for debate is a very good point right. Fox news: did it will Fox NEWS will be hosting any debates? What the point is, it is being questioned. There are journalists who are moderate, two left, leaning, more saying, I don't know about this one, because even the daily collar story, they mention that it was not the right thing to do for Fox NEWS either saying it

he added that the rules were limited, including talk, talk about Hewett and Mary Catherine Hand, saying that was not a good idea, either in terms of what the GNP was doing, but here's. The interesting thing about Newsweek story they I mention this, I'm just going to be a drag, Hunt, Sierra, they say well, some beatings decision may have drawn some criticism, close media about First may note that in that more opinionated cable news house, have previously moderate debate in their networks. Cnn, had the likes of dominant Chris Cuomo, who are often candid with their opinions and criticisms of politicians House debates in the past. I think it's really funny that the left, leaning Newsweek, would criticized on lemon. For being, you know, opinionated and partisan. He is absolutely it was recently recently recently. We recently heard that the New York Times was not going to allow its reporters on MSNBC unseen and shows are particularly Don Lemon Rachel mapped out and Lawrence O Donnell. I believe it was, and now we have this

great MSNBC in New York Times at odds over reporter appearances. Apparently there was a meeting between some individuals, but yes, download that matter. We're kit considered to partisan for New York Times reporters and there isn't. I find that money. Is that news? We can even acknowledge that Don Lemon is, you know on opinionated house, in the same vein, Rachel that out, but Don insists his has shown? Is that work are not liberal? I'm sorry down you absolutely. Are you ve made extremely overt left wing and opinionated statements? So yes, you follow me Category I want to. I want to read a little bit of this, and I have some ratings updates. Will just talk about really quickly, but I do want to stress. It is not to me about the opinion stuff. You should have an opinion housed and some people have brought this up. One person saying that this guy MAX Kennedy on Twitter- he is, Try lawyer verify, naturally as what he says for primary debate. I definitely want it

is one moderator who leans democratic and will ask questions that help differentiate the candidates. I can agree with it. I dont see what Purpose Chuck Todd serves, maybe he's a foil to show how candidates responds to bad faith. Questioning. Well, that's a whole other issue, but I can agree. Having an opinion it house can be good, but Rachel Matter is a conspiracy theorist who has no credibility. In my opinion, she has said because the insane things that shows she's a bad faith actor who was chasing the writings. I do not think she's a good choice for this. However, we do have the story, but I will briefly go over from CNN? They say New York Times, executive, editor, executive, the cat and cat and MSNBC President Philbrick met last week amid tensions between their to news organisations. Well, I wouldn't sure when we hope will leave it, there will leave it. There will colonies, organizations but alive. The lunch did not resolve is at hand according to four sources, with knowledge of the sit down the executive, main at an impasse, this specific issue. About television appearances by times, reporters on Rachel matters and be shout MSNBC show

larger issue is about the line between news forces opinion on cable networks, including CNN, so I'm I gotta get too much into this. I think I think we know if we ve got to the point. I leave it to you now to comment below if you're watching on Youtube. Do you think Rachel Matter should be again? My opinion is clear: I have no problem with her or any other opinion housed in the capacity that their opinion house, but I do take issue with fringe. Can spare if there is to our going to scream about obstruction, Russia, impeachment and they're not going to move the conversation forward and then I'm going to help. I do believe Rachel will end up doing a decent job. I really do think so. I think she knows she's under fire for being too opinionated for chasing after Russia, and I think she will try and have some good core questions, but I think it's too risky, especially for the Democrats. It is a bad play and thus NBC is doing this for the box to prop up and promote their host to make money and get ratings. I can understand that, but the Democrats, no, this is going to look bad on you. If you are

coming into twenty twenty and you are leading the way with impeachment and Russia you will lose Americans art. Can sorry about whether or not tromp was trying to obstruct when you want to fire. Robert Mahler at a accomplish question. They want to know whether or not their kids are gonna have food and go to college. They want to know whether or not the factory will be reopening. I complete, to understand the Russia stuff is an important issue, but it should be fourth or fifth on your list of priorities, mostly because it is a partisan divide with a complicated issue and its being dragged out and the Russia stuff was nonsense. There was no collusion. We can argue obstruction, fine, but a certain point enough. Why are we doing about foreign policy? What are we doing about health care? What are we doing? Not immigration? What are we doing about the economy? These are the questions that need to be brought up by the Democrats. If they want to win. I think you ve got to right click on the democratic side. I do like him Bernie, I say tools he gathered and Andrew Yang. Those are my two favorites. I have support them. Full disclosure we'll see,

I see them on the debate stage, but if they are going on in impeachment man, the Only Canada Ambit of interested is the one who says I don't care about impeachment you're not gonna, be tromp actual ass. If this, that might be there only plan after their doing it, only play they have is Trump trumpets, bad man. He should be impeached because when it comes down to the argument, the Democrats apparently don't have it but on this video with just a little a bonus for you guys, the later writings from raw from the scoreboard for ad weak, showed that Rachel Matter is a little bit down Fox news, obviously killing at sea and undue and a pretty good job? Actually, Chris Coma Breakin over a million viewers and primetime Hannity with three point: two million Cuomo with one in matter with two three, so it is, it's definitely lower than average format out. But it's not it's not all bad another definite China promoter and she is the biggest channel that MSNBC has now in the key demo they're all doing fairly bad, which is what we should rather surprising. Cable tv is on the way out, and then we do

this story, the daily collar dragging CNN, H, G tv nearly doubles CNN in prime time viewers last week sure we get it. Cnn ratings are bad. I wasn't gonna dedicate another Paul video talking about how bad CNN ratings are, so I ll just towards the end of this one, but I ll leave it there. Let me know what you think about Rachel Matthau hosting the debates are actually really looking forward to the debate. I think it's gonna be funny an interesting. We ve got twenty three or so candidates there only going to give twenty spots, I think Jalib brand is gonna, get a booted. I think we might see Ex wife I will not be there. These are like smoke and its we're, not getting any headway, so I think gum they'll be out. I wonder who else will be given the boot, but all the interesting personally, Rachel Matter my opinion, bad choice, she's lost credibility when you were not in the conspiracy stopped, but you, let me know what you think we'll get conversation going. You can follow me on minds at TIM, guest, stay tuned, new videos coming

a morbid who is coming up at six p m at Youtube COM slashed him cast news. I will see you there and all for those upon cast the arrangement may be different, but the next time it will begin shortly. The anti Straight Pride Parade son, Demand is boiling over and I give you my straight thoughts and the whole thing. You know there was There was a meme that went on for a while that they said it was ok to be white and they put up posters everywhere that stickers. The goal of that campaign for the most part was to try and show people the outrage machine will come for you. Even if you say something is innocuous as it's ok to be a you know, a white person Atta did immediately. You saw the left wing establishment types. Cultures are jumping out saying you know. Oh it's it's a damn dog whistle and all its staff, and it's like. If you can't even It's ok, then you know the kind of who's the absurdity of modern politics. So now you see the straight pride parades there

Milo YE monopolise as their grand Marshall. Clearly it's another troll and I think it serves one purpose. You ve probably seen the story on the screen Halsey, whereas shirt, that's as f your straight pride and there it is, they took the bait and that the older ones took the bait. Other news outlets are taking the bait they're, getting really emotional, extremely negative and their proving the point. What it what's. What's the point, upright pride dont done, me. I didn't organise it. Nor do I even care it's happening. You want a prayed for four cream cheese. I dont care but we ve run. You little filled up your cream cheese signs. It does nothing to me. You won't have straight by gay pride. You know irish irish restaurant for a pub pride with you with your shepherds. Overheads, I dont care parade for whatever you want Duncan vile. Don't like the logic of permits. Do you think so now we're seeing this this over reaction. Targeting something is

pull as super happy fun. America saying we are proud of who we are and we can have a gay man leader for operate. Think about that was so what so? What happens The singer wears a shirt that says f your straight pride and there it is they that their they're trolling you ok, they want you to target regular people in hundreds people who are not in the culture war and they Look at that and say! Well, why are you taking me No one at the straight pride parades at anything negative about anyone, but here comes. Halsey the Singer WAR, the victims of a what what they're calling homo phobic attack on her short with a few straight pride on the back last night. Democracy for the algae. Bbq community is so important and so necessary. Now I want to add the caviar, because people going to drag on me. For this reason, I said they're calling homophobic attacks is because, if you're not familiar, it was to women who are attacked because they wouldn't casts was a group of guys who assaulted them.

According to store over at the store. They may make, may have been some developments, but it was initially reported that they told him the cast them. Wouldn't and they start beating up autumn or something that just sounds like it. Much as you did, and I don't think I guess you can call it. Phobic seems kind of philippic right. What's what sort of a fillip like they wanted you to do it but I guess either makes out or no it was. It was an attack on a lesbian couple and that's wrong, no matter what, for whatever reason, it was wrong, but now we see the troll, is having its impact on local border Buzzfeed NEWS to see exactly why she did it she made a moving speech about. Why there's no need for a straight pride parades, that's why there's, not a straight bribery, because every thing day on public transport, it's a straight pride parades, but it isn't and no one's tellin. You can't be you or do your thing there. I thought you know

I see things like this when I see the ok hand Gesture- and I see that you know that it's ok to be white or whatever thing I think, they're trying to prove that it's not about supporting a group. It's about attacking a group like that's the idea. They were they want they want to pull the mask down and show that you know if you want to go out and be in favour of your thing. That's fine and I got I gotta admit if, if you want to do like a white, would you know white event or whenever I really dont care by all means? Do your thing has other nuth me, don't break the law, don't get violent picture permits. Do anything like that can talk about one of the hell, you want nothing to do with me. You want to march around condemning for what I am well, then you might see protest and speak out against you, but if you walk in the big or small enough, I sang like we love this country and

you love acts of that. I really dont care, I really don't you know. They said it's not newsworthy, but these people fall for every single time. Why would you ok? Look, I assure you, everyone, including the straight pride people I condemn this attack. That's also the point. So why is she attacking those? The straight pride event, which said nothing to anybody? Was negative would just like hey. You know we want to celebrate our families and what we believe- and why is that Is this an attack on them? Now she is taking an unrelated event and using it to attack a group and an that's like safer, more time that there you go, point during the concert house. He told the crowd that I want that women on her shirt we're a couple who were attacked and of us heading toward Camden town. Last week she told the crowd a concert, was a safe space and gave a speech about the continuing importance of algae BT pride into a nineteen. She said the sad reality is

the pride parades are over and after the bars close their pride nights when the glitter is being swept out of the streets, a lot of people almost trains given the bosses and try to wash rainbows off their bodies and pillar stickers off their close, because in practice it's not safe to be gaining more their worry that some One is going to assault them or viciously attack them. Yes, that's terrible thing. I completely agree its it shouldn't be that way. We have laws and is contrary to the power to protect everybody, and we absolutely should never have tier systems for citizenry. I don't care how much money you have. I don't care of colors skin. I don't care what kind of shoes you're wearing following suit. If you're wearing attracts you, if you're wearing rags, no one should attack you, no one should be attacking based on those characteristics class. You know national origin, religion, etc. Everyone. This country is protected

the constitution and believe it or not even people who are citizens your tourist in this country. You have those same protections that applies to everybody and I will absolutely speak up and say it was wrong more than wrong to attack those two women. But everyone agrees. That's why we have laws. An you damn well better believe I want justice for those women and those those evil disgusting men who attacked them to get their justice. I demand justice be beyond just saying that they should be arrested. I demanded, but here's the issue she now turns it into attacking people had nothing to do with it, for having a point that it's just anger and they'll attack you how to said so when people, so when the people around the world ask the question: why isn't very straight preparation? The answer is because there is what there was one you wouldn't have to get on that, because if there was one you wouldn't have to get on the bus and be terrified of getting ethic

beaten and killed afterwards. That's why there's not a straight bribery, because every thing down public transport is a straight pride parades, so we need to do moments like this when all of us together, we need him don't you remember how lucky we are to have a safe space right now. Peoples have. The house's speech was important and applauded her continued algae, beady activism. People say I applaud this, got emotional and here's. What happens the tribalism there like? Ok, look. Twenty. Twenty is coming there, there's more than one way to win a political battle. What I see here is you ve got the left. You ve got the right and you ve got the undecided. You know political ino, a political metal that may or may not vote you need them to vote so considering. Ninety eight percent, or so of people are straight and says, or whatever. How can they get you to vilify them by telling bite by putting up stupid signs and it's okay to be white by holding a straight pride parade and then waiting as you come out to attack them

because here is the best part. I saw the story from the Boston Globe, its everyday illicitly short story and I couldn't believe actually published this. The meaning of great pride, red Straight pride parade means, white fragility, and so I think odd. Let's wasn't, let's openness, gag us, the same story, they say it is an incontrovertible fact that certain groups of people America have been and often can do to be marginalized and discriminate against. It is appropriate, even laudable, that members of such groups should publicly stated that they are proud of who they are. Rebuttal to history of social and legal oppression, now the marginalized want their own parade. These people are having like the end, double inward ionizing who wanted to parade through scope forty years ago, are you kidding me with the same lame pretence at the first member protects bigoted speech, this

but this is the insanity. This is the game and they can't see it. They walk into these traps like clockwork that calling it bigoted speed, to just say your proud of having a family and children is insane. They make it a permit to parade their bigotry and public, but if so, when a grand will have characterize it incorrectly, It will not be a display of fragility that is the exclusive province of straight white, males, rather it will be a noisy proclamation of the profoundly on american beliefs held cadre of many women of all backgrounds, so wait on american beliefs. If you decide that your american human and you like your family in your proud of your family they're, calling you a big it there, it is it's just it's just so is like I couldn't write this stuff. I will tell you this if I used to work in events in marketing for nonprofits, ok,

we would strategies on how we can effectively get our message out to help various causes. I've done work with the ACL, you fundraising street dancing foot for them. There There are some other problems. How I dont want to name for complicated reasons. We did ST fundraising. We were on pictures and speeches, and we said this is why you needed donate and we did some other events, and I would I will tell you this though I dont work in politics and never did. If I was going to advise Donald Trump or the Republicans on how to win I'd, say: hey emphasis, I pray. You know why, because you can say all of the nicest things in the book. You can praise the algae b to community. You can have a gay man leading your parade, Molly Yiannopoulos, and they will accuse you of the worst things in a book. And what do things can happen? What do you think? at random dude, whose thirty, five and watches football all day he's going to think. When you hear but a straight pride parade and laughed and goes all that silly and then all of a sudden ears at rock concerts in newspapers, they're calling it big

great they're gonna be like wall. Would you would you mean just written just straight? People talk about their families, know you're a big it, no matter what you do. But whilst I had a really great video about this, he called he called it does speak of the devil, some like that and I think I might do a bigger video is I've got some source as possible to talk about, but he basic the US. I don't wanna put words in his mouth. My general understanding, as you say, that the intersection of feminism feminists are creating the alt right and there was a comment. I tweeted, where some guy said that he doesn't like the outrages and believing that stuff, but he's scared now because they keep attacking him and his identity and he feel stupid by not standing up to defend them and there you have it. This is not propaganda for the algae BT community. This is propaganda, for the alt right, I'm not saying you that was prompted by the alright I'm not saying their goal? Is anything all right or anything, overtly negative? It a troll, but I how you this? If this is going,

two emboldened anybody, it's going to push everyone to the right there. You are already far right are going to go further than the back. Oh, my god there it is. You can't even talk about wanting to have a family without them, attacking you insulting you saying after you and calling you a bigot when they said nothing, negative, and that's the point. These trolls are so easy and predictable and they pull him off every time like clockwork, exposing the negativity, the insensitivity, the anger from these communities. I can totally understand the anger and outrage from a marginalized community that has live in fear another exploiting that anger against them. You can't just walk up to somebody and an insult them an attack them. You cannot scream these things that people ask your pride

simply because they want to have their own parade, which means basically nothing how many people are gonna shop, a decent amount by not very big. It's not gonna, be like an actual algae beating. You pride event what you have mainstream personalities and publications, insulting. Those who would talk about this and what they're saying, basically as if your straight, if you are in a family, if your, why you have no right, you're, a big it and that's going to create the enemy they seek. Maybe some purpose, I don't think so, I think it's dominoes falling over. I do know some activists who are all about chaos in nihilism have told me straight up. They encourage this stuff because they want to see the world burn, but because these people is an emotional reaction. They can't help it's. How dare you you're not allowed? Well? Why not? What did what did the straight pride people due to anybody else?

They actually have a gay man leading the parade, doesn't speak volumes about with a striking and he thinks of the gay community that they want. They want someone to lead them. Who is gay? It's not good enough, though the trolls like clockwork inches works are leaving their men and unjust. It's like it so easy to wine to wine them up and create this kind of stuff. Nation that just benefits the right at the end of the day, stick around anymore Simons coming up later than actual be at one p m on this gentleman. I will see them the european migrant crisis. Hasn't been in the news all that much over the past few years. It was a big spike last year and the year before, and there are a bunch of weird culture worse things going on, but one thing it's often brought up is that the unrestrained mass migration into Europe is fuelling the right. Of the far right and that's why we're saying so many different. You know political groups take control or start winning in their countries, notably ITALY, who has now been rejecting a lot of these Ngos, ships, something interesting,

a captain of one of these ships, I believe, was an NGO. Was she picked up many migrants and now facing twenty years in prison, resulting in a viral campaign? is all of the stories I saw refer to it as rescuing migrants, saving them, but there one NGO in the story broke. That said, they were at risk of drowning, and this where the narrative to get really strange. It's hard to understand was actually going on so I'll try to go. Through this in the most like objective and fair way possible, but very, very difficult. So will start with the story from Newsweek about the viral free, Pia campaign for german biologist about captain she's facing prison for helping what they say are stranded refugees than the first gonna do before I move on from this is this: is people are overwhelmingly not refugees? According to the EU and H Cr, and this this blows my mind, because when the stores are going viral was taking, it

steam. I looked into the EU, and Asia are what better source. I guess I'm trying to be young trying to look for the academic papers. And they sent a small percentage that are actually refugees there, mostly economic migrants, meaning they want to come to Europe because there's better jobs and a better economy. That's an important distinction, that's seemingly never made in the press for the most part, but less will radon will soon have to say, because maybe this group was refugees personally, I think we're gonna find that to not be the case and this really com commercial bits of information before we get started, make sure you go to TIM Casta com slashed on it. If you like to support my work, there are more pull choices for donating pay. Pal crypto and there is a new address, because I'm setting up the studio you can donate physical stops and me letters whatever. Of course, The best thing you can do is just comment like the video subscribe and share the link, because an engagement really helps according to Newsweek. They say.

The free p, a campaign has been launched in support of p a camp a thirty five year old boat captain facing up to twenty years in prison for her efforts to read More than one thousand migrants from Mediterranean Sea full stop. They ve already which the narrative, ok, they have now conflated refugees and narrative. I'm sorry if they conflated refugees and migrants as the exact same thing that is dangerous refugees need our help. They could die. Migrants are just looking for a better life. I can respect that, but there is a big difference, because one gets priority. I am not, it is isn't. It is wrong, in my opinion, to take someone who's, whose crying and in fear for their life. Next someone who says they want Buffalo, wild wings and there's a direct quote from one of my great care of an individual's quota by vocs dot com, a veto acts not fox the left, leaning site, Veo acts, referencing, a migrant and the care of at it and in Mexico, saying that when a Buffalo wild wings, I can respect that. You, like you, know chicken wings of good sauce, but be doves great, but you do not give priority over people fleeing

violence and an actual risk of death. So I think it's dangerous that news. We cares already conflated the concept they say, while migrant rights groups who come, who has also work of non profit, Mediterranean Rescue group see watch as a hero. Her efforts to save hundreds of lives could soon Seeger put behind bars in ITALY. Camp who was born in Bonn will soon be expected to stand for Ireland, ITALY after she was chart. In Sicily, with assisting in illegal immigration. According to german broadcaster, Georgia. Well, as the data we reported, clump has said that she could face of the twenty years in prison and horrendous fines for her lifesaving efforts. Once again, lifesaving efforts is where things start to get a very deep story to cover trust me. Clubs, trial comes as part of a widespread immigration crackdown led by ITALY's right wing Interior minister and deputy Prime Minister Matteo Cell, who campaigned on harsh penalties for migrants caught crossing the country's borders illegally. Somebody's crackdown is also lead to rescue

where's, like camping branded criminals, for their efforts to spare migrants from the fate met by the more than two thousand two hundred people who died, trying to cross the Mediterranean last year. It's not just solving. You, though Mccrone has also come out and said this, so there the story from what is its from last year, just one eighteen, where Mccrone sad, essentially that we cannot accept the situation and we cannot permanent makes up a situation. And we are playing into the hands of smugglers by reducing the risks of the journey. This important when you hop over to read it. What do you see our slash world news where the top That's right! It's for World NEWS says see, rescues, have been criminalized as german, but captain faces twenty years in prison for saving refugees. We have only followed international law, especially the law of the sea, where the highest priority is to save people from distress noticed the quote is distress. This is important common dreams

activists nonprofit, who is absolutely framing the story as though this woman was saving people who are dying. The issue is, it may be, and is very difficult to understand that these people were just ferried by her ship. This is the important a distinction. Are they refugees are migrants? I honestly don't know. Music has conflated it when you track this story and look at the? U and aid, our ports, it seems like these- are people being trafficked and lied to Lawrence other recently did a documentary called borderless where she actually spoke with traffickers, and she spoke with people who said they were lied to. I was in Athens, Greece. I spoke with people from the Middle EAST, not from North Africa, whose out they were lied to, and it was a bad idea, but I dont want to use Lauren Southern as a source, because you know what she's too controversial by all means you're free to watch or document around. That goes a bad job. More importantly, is that we have a better source

the BBC, who basically found the same thing as Lorn Southern that, yes, someone went under cover with secret. Was your glasses and tracked the human traffickers going through North Africa? So you don't have to like Lawrence other fine criticise or all day and night. But this is the BBC backing up the same story. She did the very very same thing going: undercover and filming the human traffickers who lie and make a lot of money convincing these people all over Africa to go to Europe. Take a look at these these these le these lines. Here, these these paths, a guardian I grant you said, I'm twenty sixteen told me turned back and fear ever hitting the desert. His friends persevered toward Libya. Only one succeeded to ITALY. Later he told us the rest were dead. Is an extremely dangerous journey that you're going from these areas. Listen, I dont, think people I've ever seen. Him of these areas. There was a viral post on right it talking about how

While these areas absolutely are dangerous, of course, they're still beautiful cities- and this is an extremely dangerous journey to the Sahara and and it is, you end up with people in Libya, traffickers, slave traders as history, at its exe Emily dangerous. These are people who are not fearing for their lives. For the most part, according to the EU and Asia, are here's what I find interesting. In the in the World NEWS Post somebody put published a link to an act of this website is news. Should not be allowed by the moderators, ok moderators, but they did put a note saying the articles presenting a one sided picture but comments. You are one sided to acceptable absolute I dont believe us getting rid of the article is the right thing. I think the modest did in the end, with the sticky post, pushing back and trying to balance the store to the best of their abilities. One of the top common said this article is absolute drivel. It fails to answer even the most basic questions the reader might have

and the few scraps of information campaigns have been put to the spin cycle on high here's work. It's interesting. This comment right here, which is not verified. I dont want to pretend like it's true, but this is what someone is claiming that when they break it down and keep in mind, is just some right. Users comment the captain for nonprofit, similar to see watch their goal is to provide search and rescue for distressed, specifically migrant vessels. See watch, gets a call from the air rican humanitarian pilots, initiative, swish event, swiss evangelical group or from the human traffickers themselves, and get a move on to save these people from certain death. But it's really not so simple to keep in mind. We You know, we'd have her reporting. The traffickers themselves will signal the Ngos to come pick these people up and then the Ngos will fairy them to Europe, which is crazy because you're basically prone

having an incentive in a service that traffickers, like Mccrone, said I like mccrone but does not infringe position is as mainstream like Mccrone is a pro EU. He is like the EU dude. Ok, the Italians in pencil area and lamp Adieu saw and Maltese are upset because the presence of these non profit is actually enabling the traffickers, and on top of that in these in the areas of common, they have no resources to accommodate these people. Italians for a long time would intercept these migrant boats and turn them around We have them toad back to media or Libya, so the human traffickers decided to raise the stakes. The common methodology is that as soon as a vessel makes contact with a non profit or government organisation, they deliberately scuttled about, as in sync the boat. One hundred people are in to force the hand of the other party to provide aid. Human traffickers are aware of international law and know that if they are in distress than than illegally, the other party must pay

by assistance, so in response to the everyone will die because we sunk our own boat policy, its become a thing for the governments to rescue these people and immediately return them to North Africa to undergo processing outside the EU. The captain is in trouble because they have been in a long back and forth with the actual government agencies about ceasing their operation, see watch we'll, go pick up a few hundred people and then roll into port in Valencia or similar with the expectation they can just drop everyone off and keep the migrant boat rolling. Accept the maltese and talons. Don't really have the resources to handle these people. These are weak economies with generally unsympathetic populations, and nobody on either side is happy about anything. I get both sides having spent some time in Sudan recently, I totally get why even holding up in an italian refugee camp is better than struggling to exist in a desert with no future. But from the italian point of view, these are tourists economies being too

prompted by people without the ability or desire to integrate into the community and extremely expensive to deal with so the world turns now. I'm not gonna sit here and act like that fact. I've looked into this and have found some stories about migrant boats being deliberately sunk to pressure Ngos to quote rescue these people. I haven't been able to find anything to back it up. That is currently having happening. Now it may be that just not being reported on and that's and that's the case, and it's not like I felt like a month. Long investigations are taken with the grain of salt, but according to the BBC, as that comment framed it living in the desert. Well, unfortunately, most people aren't living in the desert. Do this go on Google maps and look up Ghana and look up these cities there? Actually rather beautiful they're, not perfect, it is better in Europe and a lot of ways for sure the economy, a stronger, there's, more resources, but these are people who are living in cities and the journey to the desert is dangerous and people are dying. This person said out of his friends only why

made, it is an extremely dangerous journey. There are people kidnapping some of these people in Libya and selling them into the slave trade seriously, and many of these people don't make it and when their boats finally get the water, the traffickers sink the boat on purpose I dont know the solution is what I do, no, that it's not as simple as saying this woman was saving people's lives. We could all do that sure, but we have to make sure we aren't helping the worst of the worst there, quite literally human traffickers and slave traders, and there forcing the hand of these governments and Ngos and the Ngos are playing into it, which was why Mccrone said enough. It's why he said this specifically in

and we are playing into the hands of smugglers by reducing the risks of the journey. Is it the right thing to do to save these people? In my opinion, the answer is absolutely: yes is very, very difficult position. These people who are being tracked and traffic are not the people at fault. They find themselves in dangerous deadly positions and worse oppositions than before they left, and it is the human traffickers who are at fault we to figure out how not to play into their hands and if the government has plan, and this woman is disrupting it then perhaps perhaps she does need some kind of penalty, but I'll end by saying this situation is complicated and she absolutely does not deserve present time. I think that is absurd. I understand the complications of the mass migration and refugee crisis, but to put this woman in prison because she's trying to help people who are being pushed by human traffickers is absurd. That being said, she should probably cease operations. If the government is trying to get a handle on this, I don't eat the right. Answers are, admittedly doubt, but I'm not gonna act like she's, helping things

just good intentions but as they say the path, the hell is paved with good intentions. If the governments, including Emmanuel Mccrone Yogurt alike, have said that this is playing into the hands of smugglers and the governments are trying to get a hat handle on this, don't circumvent the plan to actual stop the problem you're, making it worse present time no, but may be stopping her ship and some capacity. Perhaps let me note you think, and will keep a conversation going stick around. I got their main channel veto. Coming up any more about american politics. Trying to keep the conversation, main channel more focused on like bigger data Day american NEWS and in culture. Stuff I'll see you at four p m on the next on Youtube COM, slashed him cast different channel and I'll see you there censorship on social media was just kicked into for dry. Following the box, add polyps people are getting wiped out on you, too, people get banned on twitter, and now the censorship debate has become a complete until parity of itself, because

Twitter suspended project very toss for reporting on I am against conservatives from Pinterest here we have this, from human events, which we will read but our suspends project veritable for journalists, are those. Long story, never a veritable released information, which was then picked up by a ton of outlets who loves smearing merit of showing that pinterest was absolutely censoring. Pro life, organization life action. This was widely believed to be a bias against cancer. But I was because Pinterest sang the information they were sharing was automatically medically inaccurate, which I dont know. Oh I'm, not a doktor. I don't know a lot about this, but live ashen says no. Our information is accurate, which seems to me. We ve got a distortion here and on the right path. But I can say: yes, they are directing certain channels, and it's a fact now. Apparently there does a source was fired

but here's what I want to do. I want to start with a joke because I tweeted this, but let me just there's a tweet by your ears. I imagine it. You got a big party going on right and Congress are like the cops shown up and then there's like reduce who are like frat brows, who run the party and they go to the door and its twitter. He spoke in Google and on reflection in the flashlights and there, like you, got any anti servant of biased Goin on here and then, though, no officer no Ah yes year, average he's gotten then also Pinterest breaks out of the door. All drawn Clyde F conservatives and Congress is just like. Maybe we have a real problem here and the funny part is twitter, then censor the guy who opened the door for interest, so I hope you enjoy my humor before we move on now consider we are in this wake of censorship. The really is your support over attempt guest accomplished. Don't it there's a pay pal optional krypton?

I have a new address up in Connecticut if you want to send any knickknacks and trinkets people of semi, some pretty cool stuff is greatly appreciated. But of course, like comment share unsubscribe, that's what you two loves and then they just you know, don't hurt me but that's not story. Twitter is temporarily suspended project Berytus, a nonprofit organs, internet use, undercover journalism to expose corruption and and unethical behaviour in both public and private institutions. Project veritable receive, the following reasoning for their twelve hours suspension. You may not publish or post other peoples private information without their express The reservation and permission. I can't you, nuts, been literally suspended vera toss for doing journalism This was really worrying to me. I recent

a video where I was leaked an email? I confirmation from both the journalist now from the jumped from the outlet an from chased bank of the email is legit, and I said this is important for public discourse. I was wrestling with whether to bubble The name of the journalist- and I said you know we need to because the context of their riding in what they do in the past is very important. The public needs to know. This is how people are operating behind closed doors, that media outlets, but I was worried, sir. One would levy the same accusation against meet revealing private information. Will journalists do this when it's in the public interest here we have a twelve billion dollar Ip Yo Silicon Valley, tech giant, not the biggest mistake, twelve billion dollars and now their private information is being revealed without express authorization. Journalism has become verboten.

Twitter is decided that investigative journalism is in violation of their terms of service founder and president of Project Berytus James O Keefe too, that this morning the private information project posted on Twitter was a product of their investigation into Pinterest. It consists of a series of internal communications between member, of the social media platforms, staff project Berytus, gained access to the Pinterest communications via a whistle blower, in the company's communications Pinterest falsely labelled the editor in chief of the daily Wire bench Shapiro a what does call A supremacist Badman communications in took place on a slack channel a messaging. And file sharing platform. O Keefe presented the idea at the policy mix. May have simply been voicing their opinion. The employer came out against Pinterest explained This was actually in a war room where policymakers were making decisions about content. The Tec giants appear to operate on a blatant double standard,

Twitter is temporarily deploring project their for investigative journalism, claiming they can't post private information without permission all the while Facebook leaked, private citizens. Information to the daily beast to egg them in exposing a prompt support for mocking Nancy bless you, and now you see why I have called this a complete parity of itself when James O Keefe has now look You know these platforms are biased against conservatives, and then I would say this because it is really simple. The Miss gendering pie, Elsie on Twitter is a clear line. Conservatives don't agree and view the world that way. Yes, you are biased. But now we ve seen something extremely overt calling, Then she bang Shapiro this name banning live action and then, after very tough, veal is information that quickly they like Unbend, live action, but then decided to a blanket ban and publicly announced it and then actually banned the individual's that's my understanding. So there, like you, know,

screw double down wiping out their task has pulled the mask off. There is no org, sure you can say all, but this is just pinterest fine. But how much evidence do you meet? Listen, the cliff roads, It comes for everybody and now we're seeing all of these leftists complaining they're getting censored. Yes, the free speech: People warned you this would happen. I am not a conservative Glenn Greenwell It's not a conservative, Michael Tracy is not a conservative there. There is more than just the Anti WAR left types criticising censorship. You You had centrists moderates conservatives, everyone pointing the finger at the rest of leftist saying, listen, if you do this, you will get banned and what do they do? They burn their little free speech signs they. They they Devon Organisation collection, the terms, and they said no, we want censorship. While you got it, you got it

now you are being censored. We consider this tweet from James O Keefe Twitter, as a sign of that basket of journalism is in violation of the terms of service, and we can see pose this. This image, which arm for those who signed the podcast, adjust it. What we are looking at is the twitter official communication showing the tweet in question Where then, where it says arm remove between their violate the rules, and it says that violated our rules against posting private information that is mine, blowing stuff right there, while yeah, don't don't are exposed corruption that navigator band Pinterest did not stop, at falsely labeling conservatives as bad men. I asked no Ethno supremacists will call that they also censored Bible related. Her charms and bound the pro life group live action, labeling them as adult lovemaking videos right before the, but the part, one of project very fast. But you're serious, exposing Pinterest was released,

the social media site Unbound, the pro life group the next morning, O Keefe, explained Pinterest reversed them, dollar, eight hundred and eighty degrees and blocked the site again. Their course of action is confusing at best veritable later review, at the whistle blower who spoke Turkey about the Tec giants. Wrongdoing has been fired and that is a big bomber and on other people who come out and blow the whistle on the stuff. You know these. This is it. This is the risk you take So very tossed put out a statement saying you know these people are very brave to come and do this because Yeah, you can't get fired, you know one of them. These challenges in dealing with this kind of stuff is protecting sources, and it's very very difficult. I think in this three in this story, the reason the guy got caught and got fired was for one this not that many employees who have access to specific things and they know the way he talks. So it's really difficult there but what I would recommend is actually having the questions written down.

And then have someone else, an actor read them. Something like that. Do protect our They because just changing their voice, probably isn't enough, but more importantly, we're in this era, now, where you can track everyone, logging in a logging out and so what that means is, if you log into slack and you download something they will probably be able to see. It was you, so you know what I want to do. I kind of I should want to just pop down and see what some of the people are commenting on. You know we ve got some comments, responding to a general, keep saying very cup of Twitter, absolutely wrong. Someone asks this means that if we another Wikileaks style of email similar to the fidessa leaks, all accounts that share it will be suspended. Now we have this,

interesting comment from gap bids stone, Twitter, CO, founder and current employee had one of his companies acquired by Pinterest. He advised Pinterest after this until he turned a twitter again where he now works, and so we oppose this images as Pinterest acquired Jelly Twitter, cofounder, based on cue, a startup stone and co founder by single are taking new roles at Pinterest. Yes, there is a conflict of interest. Yes, the outcome was obvious. Yes, the whole censorship issue has become a complete parity. Because I'll put it this way back to my original joke about pinterest stumbling on all drunk, it really does seem like twitter, etc. That happened. Twitter was like well. Can out of the bag, now throw it and you start wiping just our banning people. Everyone left right, any matter what you get is this what you get so I will leave it. There stick around

more segments coming up shortly, and I will see you in the next story. We got some interesting new wants in the free speech debate that we need to talk about BBC defends Joe Brand over bad or pre acid joke. I completely disagree with this joke because I mean it's hard to know exactly where the liners and sometimes a line changes basin what's happening right now we have people throwing milkshakes at each other. This woman made joke that. Why do a milkshake when you can do better? Yes, it and problem. Is people are doing milkshakes dont incur jam to do battery acid, because people have already brought up the concerns that someone will do it the

the UK has a serious acid problem, but it's not just that. I have another story from the aura guardian from just a few days ago to limit when actually human, to Portland protestors, who doused cops with buckets of glitter mixed with lubricant, get five days in jail. The problem here is ok, we'll talk about what you know. What what will jump into this You don't know what to expect when you're it with a liquid. If you get hit with a liquid and then do nothing, you could don't throw things that people this to me is crossing the long before we get started. However, the TIM cast outcome. Slash done it if you'd like to support my work. There is a monthly today an optional crypto option and a new physical address if you want to send mean necks and trinkets and whatever the new studio or setting up. But of course, if you want you really help just like comment, share and subscribe Youtube engagement, does wonders for recommendations and things like that. I'm pretty sure. Well, I've read the story and talk about the new ones of joking.

The BBC has defended Joe brand against claims. She incited violence through comments. You made your radio show the comedian August on baby see for radio force heresy on Tuesday. Here's heresy joked about throwing a battery acid politicians rather than milkshakes Rex it party leader, Nigel Fries, said the remarks worn incitement to violence and the police need to act the BBC at the jokes made on our heresy are deliberately provocative, as the title implies it added they were, they were, are they were? Are they are not intended to be taken seriously? Doesn't matter not mine? and speaking after Mr Ferrari on a number of far right, european election candidates were covered in milkshakes during campaign, walk about last month, said, Why bother with the milkshake when you could get some battery acid? The comic, then, what

onto immediately make clear she was joking and criticise the not check stunts. That's just me, I'm not going to do. It is purely a fantasy by think milkshakes epithet. I honestly do sorry I didn't take it that way. What she said was why not throw battery acid milkshakes our pathetic. I dont think she's criticising the milkshakes in the way they are trying their trying to explain it. Sounds like you saying, you're not doing enough and that's where she crosses the lying there. Subtlety and there's no one's and it's hard to understand exactly where the line is count Dracula, so certain people should be guessed several times? Well, that's obviously joke not directed at any individual person over nothing with with nothing happening today. Right, there's, there's no circumstance where people are being grabbed. Unfunded chambers like that, so is clearly making a joke and it was to his dog. This woman is talking about real world events where people have been

milkshakes. She then calls the milkshakes pathetic and says one a battery ha, that's just a joke right. You may not be maybe you familiar with these story on I'm not super familiar, but something where, like the king, said, o won't. Someone read me of this priest. This is the important distinction the story goes and properly getting it wrong. You guys threatening the comments that there as a troublesome praise. The king said this and then one of his soldiers when and killed the priest and the king was like no, I didn't mean it seriously. I was just lamenting and x: pressing myself. What do you think happens when Violence is actually happening, and then you say this out of sight out of mind. Ok, if people are thinking about this as an issue, they don't do it our milkshakes going viral. What are they keep happening because someone did it? Everyone talked about it. Then everyone. When did it again? You ve now increased the rhetoric. If you ve been sensed people sure I get you

you're joking, but there is a line. Do I think should be arrested? No, I don't. I just think it was wrong if you want to make jokes about milkshakes, I don't think you should do this I'd, be like air. Well, she's crossing a lie with this joke. I honestly don't know it so this work, it's it's it's complicated right because I still don't think that you cross the line criminal in the US. I don't think so. I just think it was wrong and should be criticized. She shouldn't have made that joke, but let's not, let's play a little bit more at the end of the show Most Victoria Cohen Mitchell said she hoped brands remarks had not cause offence but reiterated The long running series had been set up to test the boundaries of what it's, okay, to say and not to say no in the UK, you absolutely cross the line if you're going to, if you're going to say this, but you're also going to criticize you lot, then I think we ve got a problem here. So let me clarify my previous statement, I'm talking about me can standard of what isn't, is ok and what isn't anxious? Clearly, joking, that's fine in the UK, though, I take offense.

That you are questioning whether was offensive, but are gonna jail, dangler over being offensive? Well, let's go to the real problem, Gavin Mcguinness, the double standard. You see many people I've took statements from Gavin which were very similar jokes, I do believe. Gavin took his jokes way beyond the rumble joking and they were way worse, but some of the things Gavin was criticised for we're very much in line exactly with what she said. What like exactly rented again gave him against did make some direct statements that I dont believe rejects. The point is, if to criticized Gavin for the similar things, but this woman did: why would they define what she's doing? Well, it's obvious is a double standard, Victoria. Also Nigel Fries treated. This is incitement of violence and the police need to act. So it's I will stress, is complicated and, unlike the top position, but I would stress this

Imagine you ve done it with a milkshake and then someone goes on a major radio programme and says get battery acid. You know you could be attacked at any moment I believe it was magic, no eyes or maybe SAM Harrison. Remember who said this? What the milk shaking shows is the vulnerability and your security there. Telling you you are not safe and if they want to, they could maim you with acid. They are telling you at any moment you are not safe. That's that's! That's terror! That's terrifying! I I can't imagine, is politicians now are going to be able to walk around safely, because this escalation sure it's a joke. I get it, but man, that's that's! That's that's on. I don't want to do How do we punish this woman for making a joke know about it that we recognise now things have gotten to a certain degree, Joe certain dangerous degree.

You later responded to Mr Ferrari on Twitter, accusing them of double standards. As an outspoken advocate a free speech and a critic of political correctness, saying I'm genuine that genuinely disappointed. We don't agree on everything, but I totally have had you down as a free speech. Man, especially when it comes to jokes. That's, what's really funny. They don't seem to understand the concept and I really really can't stand the rules offer thee, but not for me mentality. They claim they're, just joking and then, when you literally do make a joke that isn't in any way incitement. They accuse you of bigotry. Gavin Mcguinness crossed the line. They called not for fine. She crossed the line, they don't care. It's free speech. When someone like Daniel I'm makes a clear joke. He crossed the line. It does lead to incitement then, when they say Hegel with a battery acid milkshakes apathetic, they say it doesnt cross the one it's all right leg over the story about these two guys, lubricant and glitter. Should the police. Have assumed it was lubricant and glitter. You don't know

the corrosive you don't know. If it's some kind of dangerous chemical youth you hit. So but something they have to go to the hospital they ve gotta get treatment. It is it my God, people don't realize how it is to get it was something caustic or dangerous or corrosive, and- and they say, oh Shell, it's just lubricant, you don't know that and if you tell people it's just lubricant, don't worry Then someone will get you something and you'll think. Maybe it's just lubricant and then your skin starts falling off. You can't make assumptions, you can't cry Wolf Cry: Wolf was going to jail, I look at these. People are all I got to say: man is evil in a selectively, but these guys are evil. They physically attack people putting them in fear for their lives and then laugh about it. It's funny, no empathy, they don't view these. People is conscious as human beings. They view them as just like demons and that's when things get dangerous. That's what escalation happens. The story says

protestors who splattered to police officers with buckets full of lubricant and glitter. Doing a patriot, primarily in downtown Portland last summer, were sentenced to five days in jail. I think they should have gotten more than that. Absolutely Robert Jonah mature twenty eight and trust in Romany manned maiden, and attended the rally to demonstrate against what they believe are: the right wing groups. Racist chauvinist inviolate views. They showed up with four five gallon buckets of lubricant used to artificially inseminate horses. Gold glitter extend superstar type, water guns and a plan to spray patriot prayer members but your and roaming man. So they had decided whether they beg really go through with it, when police walk up to them and told them to dump the buckets police testified that men purpose purposefully through the slime on them then tried to festival Beach. And celebration after they were handcuffed and taken into custody. What was the slung? What are the police have done? Unfortunately, I'd be willing to bet

the police were like all whatever will ignore it, it's probably nothing, but it could happen. So we have a stable from the judge. Apparently, more multi, Noma County Circuit Judge, Kenneth Walker sentence them to the jail time, plus thirty, two hours of community service and one Europe probation, ok, that's by economic sense. Walkers Eddie understands demands anger at centuries of racism and bigotry in his country, and the groups still associate with it and it s their message as well as an african american men. Walker said. But he said, while he knows younger man can make foolish and stupid decisions. He's never seen anything quite like what mature and roaming men did during the rally he added. I dont think you have any out and out animosity for the police, but you don't have the appropriate amount of respect man, that's that's crazy, are I'll, say wow too, that that's that I just very very giving on the benefits of doubt the surprising bus ride this one up. There's a quote here:

At the sentencing hearing, Christians inside he'd gotten used to being insulted a mystery to me why the public over his decades long career and doesn't let it bother him, but he said he was deeply offended by mature and roaming man. So that's that's the police officer and the but act of disrespect that I've ever been a part of surrounded by hundreds of people. They decided to throw that then unknown. Liquid. All over me in my co workers. That moment sheer terror, not knowing what kind of chemical or subsidy could have been it was harmful or if it was harmful, are harmless, did not matter to them. They were they revelled in glee at what they had done in trying to humiliate us, apparently was a woman. Men saw but there- and I stress this- I'm I'm at an impasse with the battery ass, a thing because I dont think you can't really like criminalized. Fine I've got a note. You would do in this regard. I think, should be criticised and told not to do it again, but to recognise a regardless of what we do with the matter. Ass, a joke. I wouldn't be surprised if we see it soon. I really wouldn't I got one more someone coming up in a second check us sit around. I will see you soon

Yes, yes, because we ve come to learn at the intersection. All the intersection lists are quite often offended by everything and patriarchy is lurking around every quarter. Therefore, it is time to come for I can't say the name of this Amazon product, because I have wanted to turn on. What they ask whether Amazon's artificial intelligence friend is making you sexist. The time has come to design a feminist, artificial tolerance, so I saw this article and to actually ask my Amazon a device. Some these questions and it turns out in fact it is quite feminist, but what's the story I'll actually I'll stop? There are seven story as ones from last week. Microsoft word is getting echoes from last month's sorry, Microsoft word is getting politically correct that right there that feminist a eyes here to state so Wilson with the store and honour the ammo,

on a before we do go to to cast our complex. Don't it if you want to support my work. There is a monthly donation option through Paypal, crypto currency and a new physical address. Four, where you can send stuff to me. It's all greatly appreciated, but of course liking. Commenting in sharing is the best thing you can do. The story from Vocs says the other day. I spent ten minutes hurling verbal abuse it SIRI cringing. As I spoke, I said to my phone Syria, your ugly. She replied. I am, I said, seriously she replied. It must be all the chocolate. And when you ask the Amazon version, I did the Amazon device. It said to me: well, all people come indifferent, shapes and sizes, and we should all celebrate some nonsense like that, and I like ok whatever, but they go on. I felt mortified for both. Even though I know, SIRI, has no feelings. I couldn't help apologizing dont worry SIRI. This is just research for an article on writing. She replied. What me worry. I

testing out the premise of a UNESCO study released last month, in which researchers argue wave voice. Assistants are gendered as female is seriously problematic. Our digital assassin typically have female voices and female names. Apples, SIRI Amazon's, I'm not gonna, set Microsoft Court on up were us a female name. Those is it. I've never heard that name other than what like halo or something and the researcher say this- reinforces stereotypes of women as servile beings who exist only to do some someone else's bidding? Now, let me tell you some, Did you also know that when you, when you're on the phone line, most it found services, our female. I wonder why that is. Did you know that most magazine, covers its female? I wonder why that is, men's magazines have men on them. Some magic genes. Are some women's and men's magazines have men, but most time a man's make a man's magazine as a woman and a woman's magazine has a woman and it's very simple. This is odd.

I don't know what it is and in like sociology or how you describe it, but I will say this: I used to do nonprofit fundraising, but many of you may know this, and there is one thing we found to be consistent. I don't care what your opinion on the matter. It was consistent. I would ask people and we should formulate strategies when it comes to stopping random people on the street. It was easier for a man to talk to a woman and it was easier for women to talk to him, and that means, if your funded in your mail and you wave to a female, it is more likely she will talk to men will be. I don't care if you're a woman, you have a better chance of talking to a man, a guy's gonna, stop for four for a young woman. Here's working gets interesting. Women had almost no problem, stopping other women. Men had trouble, stopping other meant whatever the reason is, I dont know what that's why the company's choose to have female voices, because people are less threatened and more receptive to them. Maybe it's not true

maybe it's all anecdotal, but we see it time and time again in various technologies, so sure maybe it's the patriarchy or maybe it's just that people are more comfortable unless threatened by women. Is that possible? They say not only that the authors point out- that people sometimes direct verbal abuse or innuendo. At their voice, assistance which tend respond with disturbingly docile responses. The title of the study I blush, if I could, what SIRI used to say in response to coughing, see hurry about word, apple and other companies have since made such made some effort to change these responses. You know you can change them to males, though right, like you, have the choice because diesel- According to the study, this harassment is not. It bears noting uncommon. A writer from precise court assistant said that a good chunk of the volume of early early increase probe the assistance sex Life, Robin Lads, a compass that develops digital assistance to support drivers and other involved in others, involving logistics found that at least five percent of income

actions were unambiguously explicit. Well, you know what have you ever played a video game. People just say mean things: you know: I'm gonna throw the eight million citation of bill Mark as this week. You hit a great what we said in price. We're all politically incorrect. Yes, when I'm talking to my silly little robot device that controls the light bulbs in my room I joke around. Sometimes it has nothing to do with it. It's not a human feeling, its literally around cylinder in my room and it's not alive. I guess when we get to the point where we're living in like Detroit become human, an era where the robots are the human ask and do have emotion sure we can then our questioning you no artificial intelligence, whether on its life. I certainly wouldn't insult data from STAR Trek, because Data understands what an insult is intended to do and are insulting people to me is just a lack of it. It is its disrespectful

It gets you nothing. If you wanna, hurt someone's feelings. Fine, the robots feelings can't be heard, an avenue. I guess we could programme feelings, but I'm not. That would work. It be nice. We go to that point, anyway. Lets us radon tech companies most likely gender, their voice assistance as female, because research shows that when people need help, they prefer to hear it delivered in a female voice? What did I just say they prefer a male voice when it comes to authoritative statements, and companies probably design assistance to be unfailingly upbeat and polite suits me, even in the face of harassment because that sort of behaviour maximizes a user's desire to keep engaging with the device. Also, are you gonna complete,

in thy squeeze. My stress ball too hard. It is not a real person. Ok, it is just voice. Is it it is emulated human voice. Maybe it's therapeutic for people to yell at the robot. It makes them feel better. Perhaps if, on a person, please calm down so lets us, let us jump ahead where they say it's all part of a bigger gender biased problem afflicting the feed. Of artificial intelligence ay. I systems, including voices systems, are being designed mostly by men of heavens, that's part of the reason these systems have been hard coated to respond in problematic ways. It's difficult to imagine, attack team composed, mostly women and putting on a product that responds to who's your daddy with You are which used to be serious response. I would, I would stress I'm pretty sure that women who are running a business and want to make money would simply say: what's the most effective response, we can get to increase engagement and make money and who is going to ask the question a man or woman asked. Let me let me let me ask you this

how many women are asking their robot who's, your daddy IP, The answer is close to. None is probably a lot. Women are probably joking around and asking the questions funny, but Dude is substantially more likely to ask, therefore the response just tailored to those most likely to ask if a woman was looking at the metrics and their business, you know plan and this is gonna get more male engagement will make money off them. I'm sure she knew it did. You know right now, the mill Their industrial complex is run by women. Would you like to ask me I'm sorry you like to imply that now that we're and are running the military industrial complex there everything's getting better I know there are still making bombs that are being used to kill children and and claim that dumb, eighteen year old duties in a foreign country, whore fetching pails of water, our enemy combatants. Just because women are one of the company hasn't changed a damn thing. Actually, I've seen it. Maybe it has changed some things, but for the most part

don't make an bombs and there still blown up gets so very ago. I'm pretty sure or women understand business, and this is the weirdest thing ever, but you know what I will I'm sure it has something to do with the fact that a lot of people who write these things live in this weird world of international nonsense, And they imagine that every other woman is more concerned about social implications as opposed to making money with an effective product, but I assure you, in the real world, though we are seeing a wave of companies getting woken go unbroke. There are women, like the ones, run, the military industrial complex. Who are there not sitting there going? I know we're making bombs, but these bonds are hurting kids Maybe we should make something: that's less destructive, now they're saying how many kids, human gale bomb great increase the payload. We want better targeting says that they know what the point is It's always it's always mine blowing to me when the narrative is

like women, are not able to understand basic economics as if these companies would do think sure. You can argue it's an Easter egg who's, your daddy, you are, but I'd, be willing to bet on a busy at a business level there looking at profiles of men, a thousand women and saying what can we have these things say to target up these demographics and make them more engaged? It simple. Isn't it lawmaker rant about the stupid ay? I nonsense from vice but I do want if I do want to end with this point, auto correct from Microsoft. Word it I am now going to it's out of political correctness check that late. They stress this, but they called ideas in word where, if you say something that is offensive, they will they will I offer you a solution, so what I found really really funny about story? Is this right here? If you decide I've someone as a disabled person, the ay? I would,

suggest person with a disability. What does the same thing? Person first terminology is preferred because it portrays the person is more important than the disability. What's this is ridiculous. Ridiculous. Ok, so I saw this enemy the joke on twitter- that no one could ever called me a mixed race person, because defensive and from now on, everyone must have for me as a person of diverse ethnic and I'm sorry, you must refer to me as a person of diverse ethnic and genetic heritage, otherwise you're a big Noguchi ban on Twitter. It simply nonsense, we don't need the stuff and the robots are going to be really really crazy. But you know what I ll leave it there, yes, robots patriarchy shore or it's just good business. I dont think Microsoft needs to make this nonsensical program that no one asked and who cares what a robot at his answers to when you ask a question, why would you ask anyway it's a robot has no feelings. It means nothing. Thanks rang out, I will say

who all tomorrow, at ten a m on this channel Youtube COM, slashed him CAS News and pleasant podcast everyday around six. Thirty I'll see you next time.