Before we get started with the TIM Pool Daily, show podcast make sure you check out TIM cast Iron Ral on all podcast platforms, to show where I bring on guests from across the political spectrum and various fields to discuss cultural and political issues and the breaking news of the day, you can watch the show live Monday through fright at eight p m over at Youtube. Dotcom slashed him cast iron or find the show on all podcast platforms again TIM cast, I arel that being said onto the show last night. We got a major shocking development when Sir aliens video was released, showing Georgia vote counters, pulling boxes of bouts out from under tables after they had booted everybody from the room. Now this is already in dispute with these really weak and pathetic. Attempts at debunking the claim which you can't really do, because there's also sworn affidavits corroborating. What we saw my friend

we now have video surveillance evidence of what appears to be where's was allegedly ballot stuffing around the same time we saw it was, I should say, was reported that Joe Biden gained a an amount of oats equal to the amount expected, because in those boxes. Very, very crazy news, mind you, but this segment is not about that. I did talk about that earlier today, but there is still more major breaking news: the Pennsylvania GEO Peat has called on governor how Walter tumbled to call a special session disputing between election results, because there are wide spread as theirs, widespread irregularity. Many unanswered questions but, more importantly, a whistle blower has come forward a truck driver claiming that they drove a truck full of ballots in October. Raising it.

a lot of questions about why this is done, who ordered it and who is this whistle blower? He certainly needs to testify. This is clearly calling pencil mania in dispute now is unlikely. The governor will actually convene the session and a lot of the debt reducing its too late. It's been certified in December. Eighth is the safe harbour. You have not enough time to do anything but wait. There's more. The Supreme Court has docketed the challenge to act. Seventy seven brought forth by my colleague, John Parnell and many other Republican.

this is the suit arguing that mail in voting in Pennsylvania's unconstitutional it has been docketed by the Supreme Court, meaning it wasn't dismissed outright and justice. Alito has called in Supreme Court to issue to give their answer on this to make a statement on it by December knife. Now, of course, many the letter saying it's too late that that, even if it happens by the ninth, then it's done the safe harbour provision in the constitution says by December. I gotta resolve conflicts. Uk sounds like the conflict. Conflict won't be resolved if the Supreme Court, of the United States is waiting to give their opinion on art, decide whether they'll, exact or dismiss. This case sounds like Pennsylvania. Still, there is still a possibility, this flicked trump and, more importantly, where's your this. You gotta understand its, not so much about this hard, rigid letter of the law issue is that the

election is being disputed in many different ways. The reason I bring up Georgia, even though we're gonna be talking for the most part about Pennsylvania, is that we now have to say It may be more where it doesn't even matter if it comes to December fourteenth and the elector. The electoral college votes Biden on January. Sixth, when we have a joint session of Congress, anybody can raise objections and we might get a wave of objection from federal level Republican saying no, especially those who represent Pennsylvania saying we dispute this. We do not believe this is correct and these votes should not be counted. I have no idea where we go from there, but, my friends, let me give you this major breaking news from CBS Pittsburgh now before we get started, make sure yeah I'll check out you too come slashed him cast. I are out another one of my channels is different from this one subscribe to it. We

A Monday through Friday live podcast with a bunch of different gas from across the political spectrum. Of course, the staunch lefties ten, you get a little bit more thumbs down than anybody else for a variety of reasons. Mostly, it seems like personality issues. I guess, but conversations around political issues, topical events, so again Youtube com slashed him cast IRA Subscribe, don't forget on this channel it! The like button, subscribe notification, bout, let's revenues from CBS Pittsburgh Pennsylvania! Republicans, Governor Tom Wolf to call a special session on twenty twenty election. They say term for the Pennsylvania, alleged or end Pennsylvania legislation. And on Monday, but Pennsylvania, Republicans want to go back to the capital before years. End Thirty two republican lawmakers are calling on Governor Tom Wolf to call a special session on twenty. Twenty election, the good of Republicans calling for the special session

are largely made up of the same lawmakers that have been disputing the results of the election. They are calling for a referendum to have Congress Pennsylvania's electors. However, it is unlikely that governor wealth will honour their request but I believe this will potentially break the safe harbour, a provision if there is a dispute and the governor has not taken actions to resolve this, then Ya'Ll cancer. He, your electors, are gonna, get objected to Skynet spicy, but I got the list check this out from Darrell met calf serving PS, twelve legislative district press release. Lawmakers call on Wolf to convene p a general assembly. Before special session on election oversight and integrity they met. They gonna mentioned article four section: twelve, the Constitution of Pennsylvania provides the gun from May on extraordinary occasions, convene the General Assembly additionally, article two section: four of the constitution provides at us

full session may be called by the governor whenever, in his opinion, public interest requires now. We previously heard from about twenty six members of the p a house that they intended to call this election in spute, essentially nullifying any electoral votes from the state. If Joe Biden loses

Pennsylvania and to other states. He does not get to seventy, he does not win. Ladies and gentlemen, it's never gonna end as it may have. I think the only time this really we can say for sure is over is when, on January twentieth Joe Biden puts his hand in the Bible and becomes the president, but maybe something else happens. I got no idea, that's the real hard deadline. To be honest, I think January sex is where things will ultimately get. Spicy people have said it's gotta be done by December. Eight safe harbour, not necessarily true. Ok, we'll counting the votes in the fourteenth or casting their votes in the fourteenth. We ve said that two January, six, when Congress counts the votes and they could object, and it could go into pure chaos, but takes up.

Why is it that they want to convene the special session session? It is not just because they are angry Trump lost and they want him to win, though I think any reasonable human would conclude. That's probably a large motivating factor there. Republicans they want to win the fight and they'll find a reason, but the truth is there are many irregularities and, more importantly, a whistle blower has come forward straight up, saying they were driving pilots of ballots pounds. A balance between, I think two different cities and this needs to be investigated, but they give us a list of Achilles a bigots fifteen points. They say logs, indicating when dropbox about were collected in delivered the log of persons who made these deliveries and who had access to the drop out keys, and the access was obtained. Ok, I won't let them there's a fallen. Questions is not limit. Let me read the previous answer. Make sure I can understand the other framing this. They say there are numerous unanswered questions regarding the election that require a

sitting. General assembly, to example, examined and fulfil our duty to conduct over by the General Assembly in session is necessary to seek answers to these questions to help restore our citizens faith in the electoral process. Interim state government committee, Chair South sent a list of such questions to Secretary bookmark. In addition to his requests, We request the following information and answers to the following questions, so that was the first one. They want they want the logs indicating one dropbox backs, were collected and delivered a log of persons who made this. the levers and who had access to the keys when it was obtained two when local officials created a two percent per key system without drop boxes. Three, the logs, indicating when doubts were collected and delivered from temporary satellite offices for the list of all private persons deputize to collect belts the mobile pick up, efforts are going to read through all these. These are just the demands they have fought for. You know what they want to have happened and its rooted in

just impropriety or allegations of it, but they add. In addition, yesterday a. Slovenia, whistle blower revealed new information, a truck driver working for a sub contractor of the. U S, the United States Postal Service revealed that transported well over one hundred thousand completed absentee bouts from Beth Page New, Johannesburg P. Eight. There is no logical explanation for this. To happen, we call on you to exercise the authority. did to you and our Pennsylvania Constitution to call the general humbly immediately in a session, so that we can provide the election oversight the public deserves. I do not believe that the governor will actually do it. I dont, but let me read for you the constitution, it says December. Eighth, the safe harbour deadline. This is from Congress, not Gov, the? U S code provides that if election results are contested,

we state and if the state prior to election day, has enacted procedures to settle controversies or contests over electors and electoral votes, and if these procedures have been applied and the results have been determined six days before the electors meetings than these results are considered to be conclusive and will apply in the counting of electoral votes. This date, known as the safe harbour headline falls in December. Eighteen, twenty twenty, which the contest was decided that the governor of any state where, where there was a contest and in which the contest was cited according to establish date, procedures is required to Sunday certificate describing the form and manner by which the determination was made to the archivist as soon as possible. As soon as practicable. You see when I see here, I'm not a lawyer and maybe I'm wrong about this or by all means. If you are come at below. Let me know when I'm missing, but that basically say if there are controversies and you have enacted-

procedures to settle them and it has been determined then they'll count your votes. There are controversies. They are contests. There are challenge. They are active. There are lawsuits, they are saying. No, you have not done anything to rectify this, so why would you get your state to actually have its votes counted. It sounds to me like their straight up what we're seeing right now is now there's gonna be a dispute. Your votes won't count. It's happened before and it's happened recently check this out whistle blowers share first ten accounts of election irregularities. I couldn't go to my grave, knowing three whistleblowers alleged disturbing election day voting irregularities on Hannity as the Trump legal team, fortunate with lawsuits in various states. Ethan, peace, a: U S, are United States Postal Work Service, sub contractor from Wisconsin claim that a press conference earlier Tuesday that he was in formed of plans to backdate one hundred thousand million ballots in order to circumvent the deadline for submission peace may

the accusation and a sworn affidavit. Despite attorney general, William BAR saying earlier, they found no no proof of widespread fraud, no Fox news. They said to the state even found fraud that would have changed outcome of the election. Think a hundred thousand melon ballots. You could argue, we don't know who those boats were for. So we can't make a determination, but I think it's likely it would have changed the outcome in one way or the other quote. I have no bouts take on election day peace, told John Kennedy the day after the election, I didn't really think anything of it until the postal service supervisor asked me if I had forgotten ballots the night before, and I don't have any I was like that's kind of a weird question: no peace, that he was told that a hundred thousand belts were supposedly missing in this data was content and an order came down to look for them in those content. Illinois USB ass chap peace that while he identifies as an independent or libertarian, he felt compelled to speak out because he couldn't go to the grave. Knowing knowing you could go to the grave quote, knowing what I knew and just keeping that to myself knowing.

Something went wrong and selection. Jesse organ who also works. As a? U S, PS contract, a truck driver claimed to have driven nearly three three hundred thousand completed melon bout across state lines quote, I can tell you, I took twenty four palates, more control Hannity. This happened in October, twenty first pick them up in Beth, page in New York and drove them to Harris Burg, Pennsylvania and from Harris Borg. I drove them, drove them to Lancaster, drop the trailer and languished likest or drop my truck off and went home. Say. What's from New York to Pennsylvania YO, we got a serious dispute here. How in good faith, could this state be processed? I do not believe so, but I tell you there is good reason. It won't matter. Look I said make up that the governors not gonna convenient, convene the session he's gonna go to the to the federal government They we resolved all disputes. Those were not brought up in session. We have no reason to bring him bring em up the whistleblowers

meaningless, people can say whatever they want. No formal contest, no formal complaint. and maybe they'll say yes, but there's something else here. My friends Supreme Court again asked to block Biden, win Pennsylvania, there's an associate Associated Press report posted to the Washington Post. That says fresh off another rejection in Pennsylvania, courts. Republicans on Thursday asked the. U S Supreme Court to block President Elect Joe Buttons during the battleground state, while the states lawyers say fatal flaws in the original case means justices are highly unlikely to grant it. Perhaps, but perhaps it doesn't matter Alito said took us out little ok, unlit. Let me just say this is going to this is this. Is this? Is the heavy stuff seriously you need did let people know that is happening. This could be a game changer republican? U S, Rep Might Kelly of Northwestern Pennsylvania and the other plaintiffs are asking the high court to prevent the state from sort of

any contests from November third election and undue any certifications already made such as violence victory, while the lawsuit is considered, they maintain that Pennsylvania's Fancy vote by male law is unconstitutional because it required a constitutional amendment to authorize its provisions. However, in a sign of the cases likely too late too The election justice, Samuel, Alito, ordered the states lawyers to respond by December knife a day. after what is known as the Safe harbour deadline, that means that Congress cannot.

challenge any electors named by the date and a quarter to state law. That doesn't seem to be what I read from Congress got DOT Gov, but maybe I'm wrong about this. He says they have to respond by December knife. They have to respond by December. Eighth, that's the deadline. There is an active dispute docketed with the Supreme Court. If there's nothing done to resolve this, I don't understand how that is good for the Democrats. They need to actually respond as soon as possible to get this result all this is possible, but I tell you this: in this lawsuit a judge, a lower court judge in Pennsylvania, already ruled they will likely win on the merits, so he wants state lawyers to respond. I guess we'll see out plays out if they respond by the ninth. Then,

The dispute was never resolved. No action was taken to resolve the dispute, its docketed with the Supreme Court. How could they claim it's good to go? Maybe what they're really saying is that because they ve certified Biden, nothing else matters and you ve gotta decertify. If we're gonna get any changes, but as an that's kind of absurd, they say that after ratification is when you can actually contest the election and their contesting the whole system right now, ultimately, I ll tell you this people think it is a rigid computer code style world. We live in where they look at the longer, and it says we got it. but by the eighth. Now Supreme Court is a lot of land and they might say due to extraordinary circumstances. We are you know overriding this. It's all about people and the Supreme Court says it. Would you gonna? Do they could just say in this circumstance there was an active contest our

as such, and so be it, and on January, six people can raise objections. They gonna set. It Biden be tromp by eighty thousand votes by a block. The supreme Court throughout the case daddy, but a narrow but- and this is for meat- is a narrow runs. They said that it was too late. Kelly's lawyers, Sutton injunction Tuesday and the Supreme Court then withdrew it. While they asked the States high court to halt unease ratification until the. U S Supreme Court acts, the states justice is refused Thursday and Kelly's lawyers promptly reefs the case to the: U S Supreme Court in the states, courts. Justice is cited, the laws one hundred and eighty days time limit on filing legal challenges to its provisions as well as the staggering demand that an entire election be overturned retroactively. Not that's, BS might Kelly one if they overturn the election, which is not. What is asking for here. Would risk losing a race. He one you see how that works in reality. Having me having too

Two I reached out is that a lot of the left, the date they try to play, games and say that I don't do journalism then, and I reached out for comment to act to to individuals involved in this. I am people this why I spoke of an endeavour- were involved in this, I had shown part EL one, the plaintiff on my show talking about this and I reached out for comment. They are not actively trying to overturn the result of this elect, they're, trying to get a ruling and stop anything from moving forward. Now you could argue that would undermine the election it would prevent it from being transmitted are certified, but if the Supreme Court ruled on this on its merits immediately giving a victory to the Publicans and offering the relief of in the future. We will have a constitutional amendment to approve act. Seventy seven million voting than it would be done, but they did not do that. So this is big. They keep saying the washing opposed the AP, whatever that

no, it's not pass, it's gotta, be it's gotta. Be Euro safe, harbour provision all its off, I'm pretty sure. That's not the case. I've I've recent some other. It was asked their opinion. I tell you this on the right. They say it's not the case on the left. They say it is so I tell you what but that really means is the Supreme Court will decide, no matter what. Of course, the left is going to claim not wanting to know if you can't do it we're gonna win. Of course the rights go to claim of or we can, of course we ll win. All that really means is there's no definitive answer the court's. What the decide they say: listen to challenging estates, mail in voting law, Kelly's lorries question whether the states justices violated their clients, constitutional rights by throwing out the case on the basis of time limits and boring from refining it. On the same grounds, lawyers for Governor Tom Wolf Democrat said in court filings that Kelly's lawyers never before argued that the? U S institution provides a basis for their claims, making highly unlikely the? U S Supreme Court will grant what they are seeking

and the underlying lawsuit Kelly on the other. A publican plaintiffs had sought to either throw out the two point. five million ml in about submitted under the law or to wipe out the election results and the rock the state's Republican controlled legislature to pick Pennsylvania presidential electors. That's not true, at least according to a direct statement made by one of the plaintiff sign that don't know what the relief will be. It may be that or they might vice us on what relief could be like I mentioned they ve sat Sean Porno himself made. What they'll say as in the future, we will have to seek a constitutional amendment, but for now this this this election will stand. Ok, the media's want to frame it that way they will make the whole thing about Donald Trump to be look to be fair to gain. I says all time and it because I'm a Milton

Spencer, you know this is about tromp. Now this lawsuit is about the constitutionality of mail in voting, but it does have a bigger picture impact on the whole trump election. If this does get frozen, there is a contest to the election. There is a dispute, no electors are gonna go anywhere, and that seems to be the case. Let me show you some comments. Lawrence. Billy. He is a raw Reuters reporter covering the. U S, a print court says the GNP challenge to pay election result has now actually been filed Supreme Court. This happened after the Pierre Supreme Court rejected similar request. The case brought by Giovanni Conniston congressmen might Kelly the Republicans and Pierre claims. The expansion of the absentee voting in the state was unlawful. Actually unconstitutional can different. They are asking status to prevent any their steps being taken to certify the results. To the extent it hasn't been already noted,

this loss of challenging the expansion of absentee voting was brought after election date, not in the months prior. My personal opinion, I don't think it matters because, as the judge earlier noted might Kelly's, he is hurting himself by doing this as an argument there saying well, they should about it beforehand, maybe or maybe they're honestly, but they didn't know and might Kelly one and now he's bringing the suit and it's going to impact him in a way that will negative it'll be detrimental to him and his career judge ruled recognise that aren't says. Ultimately, this legal effort hopes to toss out of the two point: five million attitude about what we ve been through, that just as well, I was asked Pierre officials to finally response do December. Ninth from Steve Vladic. Now I defer to Steve he's a University of Texas law. Professor I'm not gonna, pretend I know better than him he's actually put in some cold war around this by saying. Pennsylvania has already certified its electors and the timing.

The leaders order means Scotus, wouldn't even be able to act on this nonsense before the federal, safe harbour deadline, which, as December eighth, pretty clever of justice, Alito and also a clear sign that this has no chance and that's a response. The twin, I just showed you Leon. Martin is a response he is with them is a morning acre on W B C says, doesn't allow Those timeline create a problem for the state because it can't clear up the legal challenges before December eighth, or am I miss misreading the Safe Harbour LAW, Steve Vladic says you're misreading it. letters have been certified and now there's no way that certification will be disturbed before the Safe harbour deadline. Liam says, thank you far, be it from me to question and actual legal expert on this for sure I would prefer to him for the most part, but is calling it nonsense. I think he's clearly biased he's, probably very much, not a fan of tromp in that maybe the case. Maybe it's not maybe this nonsense shore, but I have to I have I have to

question what he's saying you know the problem I have is people want results. They want trop to win or lose that they want this to be thrown out. Maybe you can hear me of bias. Fine then I'll give you my you know, Other side take on this and again not a law. Professor, so dont way my opinion more so than this guy he's. Certainly. So I would ask that question than just because the electors where certified doesn't mean that the electors aren't being disputed still with nothing to resolve that does when I, when I read that I said, ok, let's actually pull up what it says about the safe harbour deadline, and it says if the election results are contested in any state and if the state predilection day has enacted procedures to settle controversies or contest over electors and electoral votes. If these procedures have been applied and the results have been determined six days before the meetings, then they are considered to be conclusive.

I don't think, I'm misreading this. I think this guy might be wrong, but again outside a million times, I'm not I'm up another law, professor, he is, but it straight up says if there's a controversy or contest over electors. Of course the electors have been certified, and now there is a controversy and a contest over the whole election and the electors. Nothing has been done or applied to to defy this controversy, so if, by December eight they haven't resolved anything. Then what? How can you count the ballots? I think Alito knows what he's doing. I think the dude is one the Supreme Justice, is that you know, like literally of this country My understanding is eyes, but I've been told by some individuals and of all involved is that they they normally would have the Supreme Court to say you have two to three weeks to decide by giving them only like for five days to issue a response. There

taking it very very seriously. It doesn't mean the false Supreme Court will take this up. It doesnt mean they will win but I don't see how, when I read this, it means good things for Pennsylvania. The electors have been certified, but there is a challenge to them right now. There's a challenge to the whole election and as a challenge from the Republicans over the certification of much of the election there actually contesting saying decertify this walk back. That sounds like a contest or controversy. So I tell you for me it feels kind of like the ball is moving. Tromp is on track and he's making he's making of pet. His is way towards that path of actually for turning this and the media can tell you over and over against, never can happen. My opinion is that asked astronomical. That tramples it off to be to be reasonable I just but every day something

happens. That is still good news for trot. I just don't know if it's enough, it's not just in Pennsylvania. I started with Georgia and with Georgia the story from the epic times now, of course, you can see a big times is not considered to be credible by news garden. It doesn't matter this is easily verifiable Georgia polling manager tells lawmakers about box with pristine ballots. A polling manager in Fulton County Georgia, told state lawmakers. On Thursday she open up a box of bout to find a batch of one hundred and ten that were pristine and not folded. Most of them are pretty warm until we come up to a batch. That is, in my words, Christine was white,

so why most absentee boats are folded because they were sent through and receive back to the male quote, but the thing is, but the thing that really jumped out at us besides, the feel of these boats there were no folds was the fact that the first one that was bub bubbled in had all almost a little eclipse of white in the bubble where you would bubble it in what we began to notice was an overwhelming amount were exactly not possibly, but exactly the same, so these anti bout had no folds in them, yet they were presented his absentee ballots, even if they have wound up as prevent a provisional ballot, it would have been exactly the same. There would have been folds in them and the middle the stack boils and her counting partner found a single bout that appeared to have been pulled her a printer or copier too soon, because the image wasn't square on the paper. They say that oils previously tested under penalty of perjury,

but she saw ninety eight percent of the back in question were for Joe Biden. There was a lot of evidence presented. There is a dispute in many states if they dont resolve these two beats, which I am telling you now. Some of these are actually going before Democrats and Republicans on oversight, committees and panels. There Democrats are doing nothing to resolve these disputes, so I can't see them making it passed. The safe harbour deadline my head, as Joe Biden got this, but something in my God says, Donald Trump is gonna pull a fast one. A lot of people want to believe it. A lot of people do believe it. My head is telling me it's impossible, but I'm telling you in twenty sixteen, my gut new tromp was gonna win, but I was like there's no way that you that that's wrong this gut feeling, I think the odds, the actual logical breakdown is Joe Biden, one you can call. You called the frog, you can bring it all up, but it's not about just of the elections.

our trump versus the establishment and Joe Biden he's one but there's something there. Isn't there something feels weird, especially with all this happening. The Supreme Court just called on Pennsylvania to answer to this suit and it's on the dock it. This is crazy. The lower court judge in the Pennsylvania case said they will likely win on the merits. A supreme Court might say Yup electors out, and if they do it's done, and then what not just one state Joe Biden would leap would need to lose another seventeen votes. That would mean just Georgia and maybe not or Arizona, and about our Michigan or any other states we're talking about tromp porn off a major hatrack. That's why I just can't see it. I don't believe it, but my God says: don't count trump out, don't we'll see,

tromp did say is recorded, he's out we're trying really hard to get another four years. But if not I'll see you in twenty twenty four, so it seems like Trump, isn't even sure, we'll sell plays out. I live there. The next segment will be tonight live out on actually check out to be accomplished him cast. I oral will have segments up at six, sixteen in six, thirty and then we'll be alive tonight with Luke Rakowski. If we are change at eight p m, you too got com slashed him. Gaston well we're going to go over the latest breaking news of the day, so I hope Do you they're hanging out and are also over catching up? All of these shows TIM Pool Daily- Show and TIM Guess, Tyrrell on Itunes spot. by etc. Thanks rang out- and I will see you all them bomb shell testimony coming out of Georgia, which could change the game for at least this one state and as a tonne of other news coming ahead of other states. The legal battle for Donald Trump is far from over from c b ass lawmakers here, but shall allegations of Georgia election fraud, the

Did you see present President Donald Trump attorney? Alleged votes in Georgia were counted without supervision. That's an understatement. In the video presented that CBS is covering is covering, there is a black table for some reason in position and once everybody leaves and surveillance footage, they pull out a box of votes and begin counting now, the allegation is that the people working here told of all the observers were not counting anymore. You guys need to leave people left. They then pull out balsam under table and begin counting. There are attempts to debunk this, but I dont think the attempts to debunk it actually do any debunking one of the statements that these vacuuming organizations got claiming. How does this fake news doesn't even reflect? What's on the video I said oh, no, no, no! They that was next to the table and and then put bout in it and then put it next to the table, and it's like there's there's a video. We all watched it. They pull up.

OX out from under a table after every one leaves and start counting. Why aren't thereof? they're all dead legally have to be observers there. So you mean that Donald Trump, the Republicans woman screamin about fraud couldn't get a single Republican back I'll stay and watch. You know it sounds like outcomes razor would suggest they told the observers to leave, as will the trunk campaign alleged and then start counting ballads they pulled out from under table. What's your explanation for this, we gonna break this down my friends. There's a bunch of news coming, of Pierre Alito, is as issued a statement calling for a decision on this. This this case that could declare votes and handled ain't got unconstitutional. I gotta brightness down. So what we'll get to that when later maybe one p m this story? This is one of the biggest stories of the year. I'm sorry it is CBS reports, Thursday, a George

The Senate Judiciary Subcommittee heard a new jawdropping elegant. Her new jobs are being allegations of alleged election fraud in the state from several people, including trumps attorney, ridicule Jani, suppose it videotape evidence allegest proof of bouts being counted without oversight subcommittee, comprised of both Republicans and Democrats held a hearing at the state capital, for perhaps the biggest bombshell presented two lawmakers from inside state I'm arena. For the first time, the president's legal team led by Giuliani, presented surveillance, video from the states largest voting centre, the veto. allegedly shows people taking up at least four boxes of ballots from underneath a table and then counting them after hours with no election supervisors present Sorry Yang getting past this one. I dont know what we do from here for axis how many votes is that I believe there actually sang boxes contained thousands of balance, and this is way

more than enough to overcome Joe Biden led in the state, while I gotta be I'll I'll wait for it will read the story and see what they say. The same person had stayed behind the person that cleared the place out under the pretence that we are going to stop. Counting is the person who put the table there at eight twenty two twenty two morning. I saw for suitcases come out from underneath the table attorney. Jackie pick said so, we can here in the video? It's this, this black able right here, people leave us radon. It is believed that each Bach Box consisted about six thousand ballots if accurate, that would amount to about twenty. Four thousand potential votes have at least one state. lawmaker question the validity of the video quote. The question is, since this has been debunked repeatedly. What evidence can you give to us that counters? What a what our election officials have presented with only an hour ago the lawmakers headway want attorney. Pick said you just saw your officials need to watch the video

Giuliani and his team also introduce witnesses to verify additional fraud each witness claimed to have signed sworn affidavits splay game? Would you trust random lawmakers who didn't watch the videos and issued this button, blanket statements that are meaningless, people who signed statements under penalty of perjury, where they could go to prison there is a video of them pulling the ballots out from under a table. What is this? It's been two bankrupt Thirdly, sorry, no that's hard evidence does the most substantive and significant evidence we ve seen yet But let me welcome move onto a more in depth views from american greatness again, I could pull up. Should these rightwing sources that are not certified by mainstream media? his favorite news guard. Not people say I do you, why do you always bring of news guards him, because if a Microsoft funded, left,

biased, mainstream media sore says this sources good, trying debunk it now when I've got legitimate certified? sources. I you CBS, don't play games american greatness as video from Alike night in Georgia, show suit cases of ballots being pulled out from under a table after pull watches were sent home. Now these aren't suitcases. That's that's! That's incorrect. You can clearly see that their standard black ballot boxes of some sort. They were, however, pulled out from under a table. They say the blockbuster surveillance, It was presented during a hearing before the Georgia State Senate Committee, where Rudy Giuliani Prick President Donald Trump Personal lawyer presented his case to Georgia. Lawmakers Jackie pick an attorney assisting trumps legal team said the highly suspicious activity took place at state farmer arena where Absentee Bautzen military belts were tabulated

We have the tape from the first thing in the morning, all the way to the closed the poles. She said, adding that two Republicans to a public and field organizers had been sent here to observed at no time were they permitted to observe in any meaningful way. Pick explained the GNP observers were roped off all day with the media according to their effort. If it's a pull worker, a woman with blonde break announced at about ten p m that they were done for the night and everyone you to believe the GNP observers said in their affidavit that they were. whole counting would resume at eight thirty in the morning multiple sworn statements, corroborated by video evidence of the persons talking or telling them something, and then the people leaving Who am I going to trust some random partners like no no you're mistaken? This is fake news or the people who swore under penalty of perjury with corroborating surveillance footage. I dont know

it is enough to overcome, but what's going on and off, it'll be what trunk needs to win, but you cannot deny this, and I am not saying this evidence of widespread fraud, but twenty four thousand potential votes. This is a serious problem, for us I mean is good news for chump supporters. You got your. and she got hard evidence. Video surveillance, evidence of people literally pulling out valid from under our table. After talking to people who then swore and sworn statements, they were told to leave. Ok, picture that after the press and pull waters cleared out for remaining election workers remained behind and continued counting tabulating bound. The night quote: they will continue counting unobserved. unsupervised, not in public view, as your statute requires until about one in the morning, explain the reason they know the counting when until one I am is because the GNP observers went to the tabulation centre after they were forced to leave and we're told by a newsgroup the counting it actually continued quote. This shocked them

so they were turned back to state farm arena in about one a dot in the morning where they confirmed that people had, in fact, just left after the press and pull watchers were told to go home. It took until close to ten until close to one thousand and thirty for the room to clear pick noted then, at around eleven p dot m one of the women pulled a suitcase full of ballots out from under a table covered with a tablecloth grant. Stinchfield says this: is a total game? Changer sure looks like ballot stuffing in Georgia. All caught on camera picks out when trumps legal team first saw the video they weren't sure if it was normal to store suitcases full of boats on our tables. So they viewed surveillance video from earlier in the day to see that the routine procedure. Indeed, it was not. She said that what they saw happening earlier in the day, we're ballots coming from boxes stored in an open area or coming through a door not from suitcases hidden under the tables. Pick question the cat,

ok, so I don't know they mean by suitcases in the video. They look like big black ballot boxes. So perhaps I'm wrong pick question the chain of custody of the hidden ballots, whether they come from who put them there when did put them there. She said the surveillance video shows at about eight twenty. Two that morning the woman with blonde braids had put the table with the hidden bout in place. She point The culprit was the same operative. What kicked everyone out at ten p m quote: the same person who stayed behind the same person who cleared the place out under the pretence that we're going to stop counting is the person who put the table there pick declared she told the lobby. there's that she saw for suitcase full of ballots in or in all pulled out from under the table. What are these bout doing their separate from all the other balance sheet, cast and why are they only bring them out when the places cleared out with no witnesses pick noted the machines can tablet about three thousand votes per hour and there were multiple machines in the room and

were there for two hours, you do the math, how many belts, what through those machines when there were when there was no one there to supervise. We present consistent with your statute and your rules. She estimated that the number could easily be beyond the margin of it three in Georgia, when team tromp posted a surveillance, video to Twitter, the platform slept a warning label on a tweet saying this claim about election fraud is disputed, even though it was a breaking story and no one had yet had time to dispute it. I'm just opposite: listen they're! Already attempts by the laughter trying to debunk this saying it's not true. Ok, the stories not true, they ve done nothing debunk this other than just say they and that's a common thing. We see in the media. They get a quote from one official saying: no, that's not true and is a deep bunked, sorry grasp that they have surveillance footage. They say that going back throughout the day there,

counting belts like normal. Then they only pull this one out after every one leaves that alone to me is a massive red flag but then you added to sworn affidavits, maybe more from the job observers, saying they were told to leave, and then you have the surrounds footage of the person telling him to leave and then pulling the ballots out. It makes no sense, I can only say that to me this is overwhelming evidence of LE jet serious motor fraud. Is it definitive proof now, but this as well? beyond anything? We have seen in terms of hard evidence, witness testimony only go so far. Sworn affidavits are good, but imperfect. Some people just me understand a get things wrong, but it is evidence. Now we have this. We have video footage showing it happening. What do we need now

Well, I guess we need some kind of legit and hard investigation, but I tell you this. This might be enough to throw Georgia into dispute. The left keeps putting up these. These SK uses these reasons. Why does it matter? Certifications already happened. It's done, it's done. No, it isn't. It has not done on January. Sixth, votes can be disputed by Republicans there that men there just too much to go through your, but I gotta, I gotta fault, on historic of Pennsylvania. The call on the Supreme Court, so Alito has already answered. and they're saying no, no, you can't do this. They might overturned Pennsylvania recover than the next time we gotta go through this. I got so much to go through here fugitives by the way. Ok, let me say this: this is story that you need to absolutely share. If you wanna support my channel sharing this video really does help but let people see this and I'm going to show you the fact check on the show you and I'm a dispute. It led story, says fact check video from Georgia

does not show suitcases, felt about suspiciously Paul from under a table, pull watchers we're not told to leave. This is insane sworn statement under penalty of perjury. What gives them the right to say they were not told to leave. How do you fact check that it does not show suitcase full about? Oh? Why? Because there actually ballot boxes at other fetch. It works, then also cases now that's a semantic error, so I can say by all other this fact check. Video does not show, illegal ballot stuffing done, while someone was wearing a clown suit? Oh, it might show actual illegal about stopping, but nobody was one glance it that's what they do, because the things they go on to say is that they worked suitcases but check this out check out one of the odd. I think this is a minute. Let me show some the quotes. One quote says: election workers on his cutters are being told a level of law. If you look a videotape, the work you see is what you would expect, which is you take this

the old suit case, looking things in what way. Well, so they are suitcases. Ok, you pay. the balance on a scanner and manageable batches new scan them? They gonna say France's Watson chief investigated for the Georgia Secretary of State totally stories during a phone call December. Third, the ballots were in standard containers and the work during that time in question had nothing to do with putting with pulling belts from under a table. She said

There wasn't a bid that had ballots in under the table. Ah there's a video of them. There's a video of them. You can watch the video of them pulling it out. I watched it, it was an empty been and about from it were actually out on the table when the media were still there and then it was placed back into the box when the media were still there and placed next to the table. There is literally a video of them pulling it from under the table. This is insane. This is not a fact check. This is desperate. You don't think this is this leads stories website what they do. Is they flag things on Facebook? I think this is just fake news. In my pen I mean this is not This is not debugging. Anything pull watchers, we're not told the leave to sworn statements say. Otherwise you can assert that we have sworn statements saying. Otherwise. How is this is this, is this is knots when we look at more than they say nobody,

than any advice on what they should. Nobody told him the state, nobody told me leave nobody gave them any advice on what they should do and it was still open for them to or the public to come back in view at whatever when they want to do so long as they were still working. sworn affidavits a video corroborating, the sworn affidavits video, showing a woman pulling the box from under a table, I believe for boxes and this websites, I know, didn't happen. You know why, because this is gonna pop up false on Facebook, when people see it and you'll get this garbage website I'll tell you this lead stories. They get certified by news guard. This is why I say: if news guards gotta certified, Juno Sore, saying it, then then you know it's true right. The reason why I say that is lead stories did a fake fact check on a tweet of mine what they

do as they took a tweet of mine. That was one hundred percent factually accurate and my opinion, and then they that someone posted on Facebook. They said it was false, but when you actually click the link, it corroborated and proved everything I said, but added fake context, my tweet in an effort to debunk. That's what that? That's that's the point. I often say how they do this fact that checks right. So let's say you say something like. Ah my dog did backlit and as a video of a dogged backlit. If they want to put a false label on it, they won't say: did you know Johns dogged backlit they'll say: did Did John did Johns dog? Do a back flip on Sunday afternoon, false and I'll. Give you this big long winded here the claims? That's not true! It's not should honour the very bottom. It says he did do the backlit, but not on Sunday, by adding that one little TED bet they try and use it as a way to debunk the entire thing. That's what they're doing we got a call from someone, therefore, its fake news.

Now they say in addition to explain the only about that were scattered over the media, and other observers had left word, though, that had already been opened in front of these observers. So what's the video we watch? What are they point front our table? Why did these people say that they were told to leave and I'll tell you this? Why do we have this story? Some ballots will not be counted until Wednesday in Georgia. Falling water main break ouch, oh no from November, for there is one twenty eight M Cbs report they had to stop counting because of a water mains break cheese. Oh no await. Alright, we hold on what's this from news that combat a you, slow leak text messages cast doubt on Georgia. Officials burst as verse cycle excuse for pause and counting and unprecedented decision on election night cost outrage, and now texts have blown apart. The official story raising more questions from November thirteenth, my it wasn't, a water may break

They told everyone to leave and they stopped counting, supposedly because of a slowly on a toilet which people question because you just turn the knob on the base of the toilet and shut the water off. What is this? This is not fake news. These are from official well known news out. I pulled up news that combat eighty there's, a bunch of other illicit, say similar things. No they're gonna tell you that its fake news, they're gonna, tell you not to look behind the court. but it seems like we actually have legit evidence. My friends have a major update your check. This out Governor Georgia, governor Camp is calling on secretaries. reference burger to call for a signature audit of votes camp appeared on, interim angle. In the wake of damning security can footage that showed pull workers in Fulton County illegally press

bout with no observers coming under a table. I show you the fact check, but let me just put this: why not, if you're, if euro sceptic, if if you want to believe it fine, let me ask you a question: would you trust an individual who is not present was not. There did not watch the video footage and has not sworn statement under oath, or would you trust the people who work air who sworn statement under penalty of perjury, that they were told to leave with a video then showing a person talking them, and then they leave and then pulling out ballot box from under our table and then counting come on It is also absolutely unreasonable. Yet another night- and I hope I guess we had destiny a destiny is well. I guess you refer sums up as well, so we find them on a lot of issues and I couldn't believe it because otherwise think he's easy, easy, ok, dude as I would.

we're contrary zone or I don't know. I don't know him that well, we'll get a good conversation. You know clearly disagreed in Pennsylvania. The judge ruled that so long as an observer as in the building, then the law is satisfied, when we all know the purpose of observers is to look at the ballots to scrutinise them as their being counted, and he didn't agree use while no whatever, whenever the losses, if that they should have suit beforehand. On like this is the crazy thing to me. We, when you have an instance where the observers leave, they just come out and say: well, that's there. fault: ok, will they sworn under penalty of perjury? They were told the leaf and they were they were playing by the rules, a lot of these, People in a bunch of different jurisdiction say that they were being abused there being kicked out. They were scared that if they ruffled too many fathers they would be allowed to observe at all and for the most part they weren't. Why is this happening? Why, in these very important states are hearing all of these stories? Is it because in New York, it's not US

states on? Nobody cares. Look at the evidence, perhaps in Georgia in Arizona their scientists like the first, I'm in forty years they voted Democrat? Why are we during these weird stories. Why do we have so much of this. Possibly it happens all the time and that's actually quite scary, it's possible that Joe Biden isn't actively seeking out Emmy cabins evidence one question being raises wire. All of these mistakes beneficial to the Democrats. All of these errors the glitches, the vote flipping whatever always beneficial to Democrats when they happen, could be that by does not looking for it, but that doesn't explain. George, and these several counties where votes were found uncounted for Donald Trump. I now give you or I should say, unaccounted in general, which leads trump. I now give you the final and most important kind of, but on this we have this video them pulling out ballots from under a table and counting them. People aren't there

also stories that several ballots for trumped up several batches that ultimately gave drop a hugely too store of gaining a recount were discovered not to have been counted. So these things happen these these errors, these impetus impropriety. It literally happens at what point do you need more evidence that some thing is broken in this declare clarify I'm not saying trumpets, correct, that the election was changed by widespread fraud. I am saying you cannot deny what we are saying in this and it needs to warn a hardcore high level investigation of some sort. Well, they're going to do a signature on it. I don't know if that'll be enough, we'll see, I guess they're going to keep fighting. I've got news on Pennsylvania and I'm like trying to figure out which story do I do

but this broke before the Pennsylvania story broke some like ok I'll, do this story first, at one p m. I will cover this on this channel. So come back share this video subscribe to the like button. There has been an official request to the Supreme Court and Alito is, is requesting an official response from Scotus by December knife. This could break Pennsylvania stick around at one p m. I will be back with that story. Thanks rang out, and I will see you all them California is going for a hard lockdown of three weeks, Joe by and said in an interview on CNN, just a hundred days of wearing our masks to finally be done with this miracle a year after it was only fifteen days to slow the spread. The hard bargain California. stay home order stay inside your home for three weeks. You can't leave well that

Insane in the problem is first of all, it didn't work in the first place we locked down and then what it came right back, but why well maybe we'll have to say it's because we are back up. You may tell me that if we lock down, we can we can get it under control, but that no matter what happens at any point, reopening in any way is gonna bring it back. If I don't wanna come back, sounds to me, then the problem is covert exists. We can't do nothing about it. Can we, however, there is a vaccine on the horizon and maybe that's when things finally end, but for the time being to tell people they have no right to seek to support themselves and to feed their fair please or to compare rights in any way to killing people or drunk driving, for instance, is absolutely incorrect. and I did talk about the other night with a narrow podcast. That's why reference it now with with doesn't he may be familiar with them? He's

say a lefty kind of commentator when he said that we should locked down hard for two months. People should get compensated. There should be a stimulus to make sure people can cover all their bills and everything the problem is. There is no such thing as a total, incomplete lockdown. Somebody still has to work because people still have to eat and the issue I brought up then was don't we have rights. The argument that I was given was well. What if you write to go, what to go out you'll get people set like? Do you have a right to drive your car drunk the differences? You don't because you don't need to drive drunk, we do need to go, by food work and make sure that we can pay their bills, feed ourselves, clean ourselves and take care of our health. Now we see what's going on in Europe in Europe, there is a war. Is a viral video woman goes to a mental obviously with their mothers are. My mother was ill, the cops, detain and taste this woman

suicide is skyrocketing. People are not dealing with this well and, if you're telling me, the lockdown did not work and simply because we reopen it came back Then there is nothing we can do to stop it. Can we save the vaccine? So perhaps we should have had some kind of measured protect the vulnerable plan, allow people to live and work and not just destroy everything and cross our fingers of actually would happen, but you do have Donald Trump thankful that operation warp speed at this point, that's we're on we should have. We should reopen. We should protect the vulnerable social distance. Wear masks makes the most sense right. Joe Biden says: wear masks the lock downs don't seem to make. and we're doing another. Three weeks, fifteen days is authorised by what happened at twenty one short. Now nearly a year later. Well, my friends in California sheriffs are telling Governor Newsome. They will not fully in force stay at home order

and they shouldn't, because Newsome is the one who defied his own rules and it's all of these democratic politicians who are defined in their own rules. While tell you this, I refuse I've been a system where you think you can take away someone's right to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, but, more importantly, survival just life. You can take that away, and then you knew some think you get life liberty and the pursuit of happiness, while everyone else barely gets life Sorry now people need to be able to survive. They do work, support themselves and maintain their businesses. That's pursuing life. Beyond that, I think we can. make some sacrifices are trying fend off a pandemic. But when you have these, people live new. Some like Pelosi like lorry Lightfoot, like Wretched Whittemore. These people clearly don't care banalities rules, they don't even fear covered at all. They go out in defiance of everything.

because they don't care. I wonder what it is. They know that we don't or maybe they're just reckless and insane, but only the only To put it right now is that clearly the lockdown did not work are not working, probably will not work, and even though Health organisation said it is a very, very last resort. Well sorry, we tried lockdown for months and if it's coming back, no matter what, then this is not the solution. It is going to result in more death and suffering, but of core. I am sure many of these crony corporatist pop political elites don't mind, because the money is slowly being siphoned away to the ultra elites, but at least we can, turn on some cops to say. F now in New York we have Staten Island is bar owner gets arrested. He stands up and he says I got nothing left to lose. You opens his business free food and drinks. Please donate they arrest the guy, and I called these people, I'm not going to call him cops.

call em, maybe like the delors, Yos, Praetorian Guard or oath breakers. I really like that oath breaker right. It sounds good. The police officers in Staten Island who are barring this restaurant. This applies bar from allowing people inside our own, breakers. These are people of no moral standing, no ethics and they are corrupt, as corrupt can be so my understanding is that the Nypd swears an oath of the constitution and the institution says we have a right to peaceably assemble. Could you imagine seventy? So you know seventeen seventy four, whatever one we're doing these constitutional conventions Duff, then there's like a decree from from the king. There there's a pandemic, no one Who can gather no more, you know, go home every by and there like. Ok, no, they were meeting in secret and it was from from grounds, perspective, seditious priests.

this against the crumb. Today, people want to peaceably assemble, as is their constitutional Well, New York City has a large swathes of oath breakers, who are willing to take any and all cash they can all if it means they can ruin your life he's gonna, where these are truly some of the most despicable people on the planet, people of no conscience of no morals, no ethics, no integrity, oath, breakers. But what do we have here with each with his California shares my friend? These people are a keeper, not the oath keepers and a sense of like the actual militia group, though that's a reference to their own constitution. I'm yeah that these sheriffs or saying we're not going to force a stay at home, water, it's in violation of the constitution, I'm sorry, I understand all of these countries are saying these We need more on think they have a right to go die. They do. Quite literally this proof. The saying is well in New Hampshire: live free or die.

And I believe it was in Virginia in the late. Seventeen hundreds give me liberty or give me death. do you understand what that means in this country. It means that people would prefer to chew, whose for themselves or be dead, that's crazy! That's bold man! That's this country was founded. but now, in these big cities we have a son and does give me security and tell me what to do about? That's. Basically, what they're saying Newsweek reports? A number of here. Offices in southern California have warned Governor Gavin Newsome. They will not be strictly forcing to do stay at home order, which is expected to be imposed across the state. The new strict order will see the closure of non essential business. Is it just hair, salons, movie, theaters and other indoor record facilities. Restaurants will only be able to serve take out without door, dining also banned and retail operating at twenty percent capacity,

Newsome said, the state of order is needed, as the state of California is currently at the tipping point in its fight against the virus. You wanna know I think Newsome is lying because he would I'm partied like twice. I think it was. He clearly doesn't think it's that bad and he's not scared of it. He's probably lie, nothing people take it seriously. I get it. You know they warned us earlier in the year that we're going to have on and off locked out clearly that doesn't work don't know what the solution is, but that doesn't work because the economic, Towns are also bad for people suicides. My friends tragedy. Eleven, the old boy takes his own life during zoom class. Why they say it's it's! It's really simple! Actually,. these children are suffering from anxiety. and isolation and suicide is on the rise. This is nightmarish. I'm sorry, you know if my choice was

We are going to see more death among people over seventy, but we'll save our children. At a certain point. I think we priority. as our children, and I think that something the elderly would agree with. You know about Fukushima, Japan, the nuclear reactor, the meltdown all stop the tsunami, they were trying to go in and stop this meltdown, stop this radiation leak and the elderly chow rose to go in and do it risking their lives saying because we ve lived our lives now we must do what we can to protect the next generation that is honour that his integrity not want anyone it die, and I don't want anyone be sacrificed for anybody else. I'm just saying that a certain point seems like were willing to accept the death of our children. To save people who are, you know, there are seven. These are older. It comes down to an issue of its very much a deontological, logical, verses, utilitarian approach. I think we must protect their rights

all individuals and do everything in our power to protect the the elderly and make sure they survive, which is why the solution is actually quite simple if we were to say protect the children at the, asked of the elderly would say reopen, don't lockdown end of story. Most people under seventy are absolutely fine and then put nine percent, but ninety seven point five for those above seventy So we found the solution. We dont want kids taking their lives, so we reopen, but we protect the elderly We have social distancing, we wear masks to make sure we spread disease to those who are vulnerable, not just the elderly, those who have come here, but it is or over wait we protect them. We protect those who are vulnerable. We don't sacrifice healthy children and see that the destruction of the economy in order to protect the elderly, because we can do both- that's not what's happening. These people are despotic Newsome announced on Thursday, the state

California will be split into five seconds and all counties within that area will abide by the same corona virus guidelines. The new order will be. triggered if a region's intensive care unit, bad availability, drops below fifteen percent. southern California is currently at around twenty point six percent. I see you availability with this morning that the area is expected to hit the trigger point by Saturday. Northern Keller yup, Greater Sacramento and San Joaquin Valley are also expected to follow suit nuisance. New order officially goes into effect on Saturday somber. Fifth, at one p m, once an area drops below the fifteen percent threshold, They will have twenty four hours to implement the necessary arrangements. Come from him. I say yeah right, but isn't it strange the system that we have acted, where we are basically saying that those who are healthy and safe should be isolated and though so our six should as well. the meme, those like this, a quarantine is one,

Take those who are sick and vulnerable, and you I salute them for theirs their and our safety, a tyrannical. You know despotic fascistic power, grab? Would be more when you just lock everyone up in their homes under threat of law, good his sheriffs for saying no, I like it. I, like it New York City, got their oath breakers. These are look look when you not funny. I spend a lot of time this year, defending police during the rights and all that stuff sanctify. The police are stupid, but I'll tell you what Nypd? If that's, how you want a role that I'm gonna sit back and say good defined em. You know I want to see that cop all of em standing outside that bar I want to look in the eyes when they announced the strip there pensions were that's. Why I want to see all will feel so good, wouldn't it. I would like a civilian oversight coming with us. our to strip away the out for one to fire and stripped the pensions of officers that guy

an unconstitutional activities there, maybe maybe reason like if they violate the constitution. A couple of times I ve been here three strikes and you're out. No more, like you have been found a survey in order that committee to have violated constitutional rights, the old. It would be hard to figure with the processes right. Obviously you ve got. The left sang in somebody is a violation violation of their rights like no cops are right to do that, but you know the right to peaceably assemble standing in front of our I'll. Tell you that if there is an unlawful assembly, because you ve got violent riots or something ok, then I understand, but an edict past declared by the governor with without the legislature without approve and you come outside underdog I'll, follow whatever order he gives me, then I would love to see that officer crying his eyes out. As they say, all your hard work, all money you ve saved earned is gone. You are fired

you will never be allowed to be back on the force in the state. I would like to see some hard accountability for those at Violet constitution. Oh, oh, oh, oh, don't don't don't don't don't interrupt me yet left that absolutely includes killing innocent people, one hundred percent. I think the issue when it comes to blacklist better talk about police it given the police, is that they often assume that legitimate justify. This is a force, are violations of civil liberties and civil rights and things like that. No that's a challenge why I think I'm in fair outcome in favour of reform. I'd say this: if a cop walks up to a guy who's filming and without all these videos and he attacks the guy while that strike one body that strike one a mocking defend police officers. Who do that? I will have defend a cop whose stopping someone in their vehicle- and they say buddy. Can you keep your hands on the wheel for me and the guy says no, and there like put put your hands were, I can see him and the guy things down grab something the cut backs up. The guy gets out of his car and then there's a shot,

I would say in that instance like that specific example, Maybe the man was unarmed. Maybe he wasn't rate. for something we all know, but that's a tough situation of being, and I recognise that we ve seen situations like this. I look at the story of that that man, I believe there was Flint final Castillo. I was. I was furious about this. The guy driving and Fernando in the copy had a weapon the cop shot him anyway. That is not defensible in my opinion, but very, very different from what we see. and say Staten Island and therein lies the serious conundrum. No one. Be blindly supporting cops, no one, we should support the institutions, we should call for a former accountability and we should recognise on the left there like All this, this cop, the guy, was running Adam screaming in the cup shot him yeah Cobb was being threatened. somewhat, doesn't show their hands at a cop freaks out. I don't think that's criminal. I think that cop should probably lose exe to their firearm, or something like that. I tweeted about

before I got Ronaldo. These can serve. It got so, madam, using our so dumb. If a cop panic and shoot, and unarmed guy, maybe they be someone with the gun I Stan they're scared, but we're talking about having people are There were taken a serious risk to understand that risk. It's tough, don't don't look get me wrong. I've seen all the videos where, where you know the cop like walked into the car and the light, can you get your license for me and the de Jure shoots the cup it happens. So we need reform to protect, cops to better incentivize cops and to prevent people from losing their lives. But this kind of stuff happens. Understanding that I kind of you know. Begrudgingly say in some circumstances a cop maybe of at me, maybe panicked and win and was you know, are necessary. he freaking out and killed an innocent person, it's very, very different,

well fully sang I'm gonna violate the constitution, dont care. You cannot just blindly march to the orders of Governor Cuomo he's as executive order. Do it in a cop goes: ok, there's gotta at some point, some kind of oversight, in fact, maybe what we need is not some oversight where they strip the pensions from these cops, maybe something like there's an oversight board literally inside department and when it went to cops, were sending out. You know seven people we waited for the bar, that's gonna know you can't do that again They make it an argument. You can't do it, you can't go in short. These people down can do it. I'm not gonna pronouncing answers. Maybe that's just an emotional reaction is ass. I really can solve anything. I recognise that, but I tell you men, nothing boils my blood more first and foremost than scared. You no cops killing innocent people and I'm talking about non if I use of force I'm talking about a cop on and I'm talking about. You know, innocent people dying makes me angry.

sometimes I can recognize justified use of force, or I should say when its justify. Yes, of course, I can recognize. It sometimes also argues apply of a higher threshold than say like that that the medium investigatory boards might have. When I watch this video, this there's one video our guy was filming cops and the cop walked across street walked up swimming smacks. If one of us has a rest, some tons of videos like that that boils my blood boils my blood violating our constitutional rights and I'll, tell you what an absolutely The second amendment, the first amendment, the fourth or fifth all that stuff. So when I see these cops enforcing these Lou. let me show you some ABC finally ports on Democrats violating their own rules, but won't call them. Democrats, Newsome that the Earl of this man. The nerve of Cuomo Outcrop Chris, come on CNN to pretend to be quarantined, these arse sick, sociopath individuals and they are all

we able to commit these crimes like the boss, YO billing taxpayer dollars, took two graffiti, the streets with a political campaign slogan because they have oath breakers guarding them villains. That's who these people are. I don't fly the blue light matter flag for the black lives matter flag. I respect police finally, because I've been in many circumstance I'll tell you this. I ve been more circumstantial. The bag cops and good cops, but first of all with what we have problems with placing for sure quota systems, others, dumb stuff, whether it's like legal or actual have on paper: the idea that people are generating revenue by ticketing people we got. We gotta have hard reform. We do, I don't be we live in like fairly well off suburbs, who are constantly complaining about all that that within it like there's no crime in their area,

I have a friend who lives in a very, very small, sleepy suburb, and they say that the sheriffs apartment just tickets, people because they're making money MIKE I hear you did I hear you will hear the problem. My friend you live in a Democrat, controlled area. Ok, maybe that's the real issue in them in that in the areas that lean more republican maybe have more integrity. You have people who, I guess care about. The community have empathy, respect, loyalty and authority in the right way. And his blue areas. You have people say I don't know you. I don't care about you giving my paycheck and you can. I thought you know growing up in Chicago. That's the cops work. They don't know me didn't care about me and they said tell to a judge and when I was like dude, I got. I told a story of their day. I got pulled out it was a bs pull over. They make me speeding when I was not speeding and back on my lesson suspended and the cops. I tell it to a judge. I can't afford tell to a judge, so I totally yet united Documentary Ferguson? I understand the anger for many people who

not well off, who can't afford to deal with these fights and an end up getting abused by bad cops. I've been saved by cop couple cops one time and I recognize, just because they are bad experience and big cities doesn't mean Institutional of policing is wrong. It means we need hard reforms and the funding ain't. It pull rug out from under departments ain't it. What needs to happen is a better culture built around upholding the constitution, respecting the community and understanding. Sometimes you take big risks. I don't like what we're seeing with all this lockdown stuff, and I expect it's only going to get worse. I'm not going to stand for it. Then I got no problem. Writing on cops all day and night who violate the constitution, I'm going to say it again with breakers the lockdowns a bad move. I made my point. I think it's only going to escalate, but I'll

they're, your I'm sure, there's a lot of people probably dont, want to criticise the cops whatever. But you gotta be honest. I'm not I'm not here to just play defence for tribes for blue eyes matter from like that, and I think, if you're, a tram supporter and constitutional list, you better come out and criticise the oath breakers when they violate the rights of these small business owners. There is nothing more fundamental to life liberty, pursuit of happiness than running your business to feed your family and the only reason these people and their rights while it is because of oath breakers, like the regulars or the british Empire, who said we don't care about your rights? We care about our cash from the crown these people care not for it means to be an american I'll leave it. There I said I want you to do ass. I went on the p. A constitutional suits gonna go to spot, that's about dates owing to push that two to four p m over at Youtube:

calm, Slash TIM cast. It is a different gentle. So right now did us. The like bond, subscribed modification belt, go to the address bar typing Youtube COM, slashed him cast and press enter bone there. You go new channel I'll, see all therefore pm. Thanks for hanging out.