Today is November twelve, twenty twenty one and our first story the FBI. not only raided James Oak? the home and the homes of project where it has journalists, but it appears now. They are leaking privileged legal communications in New York Times. My friends, this is beyond a scandal. The government agency going beyond rogue, so the night is always darkness for the dawn, but why is it getting dark next the media brings in the Anti VA leftist from the Rittenhouse trial who lies contradicts his own testimony from the hearing, name's Rittenhouse May, when in an extra the judge agrees with the defence on the gun charge saying there is an exemption if you're, sixteen or seventeen years old, you are allowed to bear a rifle along gun, in which case he's kicker that drugs to the jury and Kyle. Maybe a quick on at least begun charge. Now

using arguments are Monday, so we'll see our place out. If you like this Please give us a good review. Please give us five says it really does have a lot. More importantly, just tell your free about the show, because word of mouth is the best way to help a podcast growth. Now, let's get into that first story, last night during the live show over a TIM cast iron well towards the of the show? We got word that not only we already knew this FBI raided project fair toss, but not only had they rated them, they had seized privileged Lee go communications and were leak, them to the New York Times a moment's words project vats. Us is involved in a lawsuit against the New York Times for defamation, for the FBI to provide privileged legal communications to the New York Times, goes to show you that whatever I want to call the cold civil war, the cultural civil war. It is.

Escalated beyond what many people ever expected possible. They say things like it can't happen here, It's happening now he federal bill. Of investigation under dubious pretext raided the home of James O Keefe, while he's partially clue with coughing em and seizing his electronic devices, taking his private privileged Google communications, let me just stress you want to make an argument about a crime being committed. People have a right to confidence between their lawyers. the communications were linked to the New York Times, the only power possible source, was the FBI. Has many other personalities have attested to the FBI sees these patients and all of a sudden. Your time says following the raid by the FBI. Documents were season, we reviewed them so there being linked to the FBI.

I warned yesterday in a very heated rant. They'll come for you There is no hiding the youth. You think that complying with terror, well, it will get you out of it now. It will only make it worse and if history has taught us anything, it's that no matter who war from the lowliest homeless, man on the streets to the mightiest media mobile, the machine will come for you you may one day find yourself a humble gas station clerk, and I mean it with all the respect it working a humble job where you're running a register, and selling goods and helping people feel their vehicles and then one day someone makes an accusation against do because they don't like you to the gestapo. I mean the FBI The next thing you know is their kicking, your Dorin and there stealing your legal communications with your lawyer, providing that two journalists-

I've already seeing signs of this in western countries. I saw this in Sweden when local news outlets gained access to hacked communications, comment, sections on websites and then went to the homes of individuals and threatened them, sickly, like we're, going to publish your name and come after you. Unless you Ben Betty. We ve already seen CNN go after people for posting means, but now we can see how serious this the dvd state the bureaucratic state whatever it is. We can see just how dirty dirty it is their going after opposition journalists project Kratos of core He has been doing investigations into corrupt law enforcement, and this is how they stop it. We are, we are as a country in the territory of the Soviet Union, the fascist states, the thought Harry and states of history. You thought it couldn't happen here, my friends

this story. I will give you now it's here and people cheering for no money. Leftists many progressives realise the danger in a rogue FBI, targeting journalists, even if you dont, want to concede that project red ass, a journalist with many on Twitter, are still celebrating the thought. Terry and rise music people claim to be anti fascist, their fascists. So I will stress to you before we begin to read the saga. That is the agreed, just violation of constitutional rights and illegal illegal activity from a rogue FBI, which has been bad for some time. I do I I might remind you, there was a man whose home was protests by black lives matter. The police arrested him There was a home that had nothing to do with the disappearance of two girls and blacklist matter activist set fire to it twice. There will come a time

when law enforcement by police or federal come to your home and kick your teeth in over some dubious accusation and They'll do with a smile on their face because have already seen the police officers in New York defend the paint the black lives matter, mural, which was painted illegally. There was no permit to put to paint a message on a street knowledge into Donald Trump, involve dial trumps building and twenty seven police officers, I believe, arrested those who dared to defy the despatch. The police will to a great degree law enforcement. Will to a great degree. Come to your home. While Europe children are eating breakfast, they will back skull and of your son, and they will do him out while you bag and scream and have no idea what's going on? And if you

I'm wrong. Then you haven't read: history must saying all cops are bad at stupid. I think the police are good, but the good cops are quitting and the FBI is rogue period are much gonna talk to you about James Oki, from a talk about January. Sex are to talk to you about Russia Gate. We are at the line but I'll thrust of stress the act of desperation and going after James O Keefe shows how terrified there really are, you see if they were in complete control and had the power that means many assume they had. They wouldn't need to do this. They simply spy on James O Keefe collect what information they needed. No they're panicking, because the establishment is faltering and is collapsing in that means, we must hold our ground and be peaceful, persuasive and resourceful

as more and more elections begin to swing for american first individuals and populists be progressive in some regards, or otherwise we see that the deep state administrative state, the bureaucratic state, is in full on panic mode and its project veritas as I they hate they exposed. Epstein now those great worked on by Miami Harold Investigative reporter MIKE Servage, but also light was shown on how the media covered up for Epstein. I don't think the feds wanted to have to deal with that. What's revenues, for we get started had already TIM cast out, become a member to get access to exclusive members only seconds the dim cast iron podcast and with your membership, you are helping us do a lot to nonprofits one, creating technology that will help guard you from censorship, free, open source technology. To give you the ability to remain on social media

never be censored and another to fact check the lawyers in the media. Both will will gotta have launched, but they all under full swing. After the new year for taxes, the US and Europe also helping fund journalists. The goal of of all of this, what we're doing TIM cast is not infinity, pools and owning our own private jets are anything the money that you you give good is go Into investing in these projects, culture building, chow, lending the lies and manipulations defending freedom in liberty and spreading that ideology of freedom, personal responsibility, life, liberty, unhappiness. Thank you for your support in that regard, and now, let's all support James O Keefe as the administrative state goes Rogue and tries to shut him down, not as is pathetic, on. The part of the FBI is desperate and, dare I say desperation is a horrible stench you see when you are desperate, you make mistakes, and

It seems that perhaps project Berytus is engaged investigation is gonna really expose someone naughty, and it could be that they had no choice but to take the most risky and dramatic action. But now I wonder, is project: where does continues there lost within your times in New York Times reveals they have access to project that has as legal privileged mitigation well, that's a very, very stupid thing to do, because now project verities might act and virtuous might be able to get access to that information New York Times. How did you get our privileged legal community? hence I when they can try and make arguments about, will protect our sources in and what

but a judge could say no. This is private. Legal communications like this is privileged. This is a core constitutional right, fair, tossing, actually built a file for defamation charges and then get discovery and discover who the FBI agents are that leak. This information I want to start with with the core of what happened from November. Seventh, this sure looks like bite in the Department of Justice, persecuting and opposition journalists from the editorial border than your post. But you don't have to be a fan of James O Keefe style of journalism be worried about how the government is reacting to it. The FBI Haven't federal prosecutors are investigating the case of actually bindings diary, the President's dog as it was stolen in a burglary last year, then obscure, right wing website wound up publishing. says our pages from it. About ten days before the election O Keefe says someone shop. The diary to his project veritable claiming Biden had left it somewhere. His outfit didn't use it in part because it couldn't verify it.

He says he informed law enforcement of the whole thing, but sometimes the effort that did publish, which seems to be why fads raided the homes of several current or former veritable employees before dawn Enow keeps own case he's outrage. The feds urged him not to go public with the subpoenas, but someone dropped a dime to the New York Times which started calling for come at an hour after the first raids, Thursday. journalist, can't be prosecuted for publishing Stalin materials unless they were part of the theft and the theft in question seems to rise to a federal crime. She'll boss normally mean law enforcement can't make reporters reveal a thing about their sources, even if they didn't publish anything journalists regularly published materials that had been leaked or even taken consider the time's running present Donald Trump tax return unless the feds know something about tosses sanctioning the burglary. The diary does not warrant predawn raid It has all the marks of a political vendetta- that's not at all,

a good look for a binding justice department already and ill repute for intimidating parents who just asked questions at school board meetings. That was the initial report. Initial report that raids occurred on James O Keefe in his staff in the New York Times got advanced word, meaning somebody told the New York Times. The rates were happening. It's worse. In an historic many times we have two journalists, Adam Goldman and Mark Missouri. They write project veritable and the law in between journalism and political spying. documents show how the conservative group worked with lawyers to gauge how farts deceptive deceptive reporting practices could go before running a foul of federal laws. Now this is what called false: framing all news organisations have legal departments. In fact, when I worked for ABC News company. They instructed me to talk with lawyers about the legalities of reports we had done. That is

say if New York Times is being fair and correct, I can state definitively that B, C news and unification regularly meet with lawyers to gauge how far they can go, before breaking the law? Now, that's ridiculous, framing journalist Are just trying to make sure they're not going to get sued or charged if they cross certain lines? Why well some states have one two or all party consent for what James O Keefe does undercover reporting. It's probably common that he goes to his lawyer and says. If I go to California and secretly record someone am I in violation of the law the lawyer will then say: California has a two party consent, state yadda, yadda yadda, that is to say that, of course, he's talking this lawyers to make sure isn't break the law. Why? Because, if you operate in different states, different states have different laws in the article they say

hours after FBI agents searched the homes of two former project for US operatives. Last week, James O Keefe, the leader of the conservative group, to you to defend his work as the stuff of responsible ethical journalism, private it has long occupied a grey area between investigative journalism and political spying. Stop full stop false! That's a lie. Channel four in the UK has done under cover sting operations under cover journalism is existed for a very, very long time, probably forever, so no that's just false framing. That is enough. Act? An opinion to say that project, warehouses, occupied a grey area between journals, been spying is an opinion. Of course. The New York Times won't say that they say internal die. and obtained by the New York Times reveal the extent to which the group has worked with lawyers to gauge. How far is active reporting practices can go running a foul of federal laws. The documents

series of memos right written by the groups. Lawyer detail ways for project where testing operations, which typically diverge from standard journalistic practice of employing people, mask their identities or create fake ones to infiltrate target organizations to avoid breaking federal stature is the law against line a government officials. Now it's possible that it wasn't. Actually the FBI who, like this there's a lot of steps in between we don't know for sure think it is reasonable. To conclude, however, and in my opinion that is the case, and thus the thumbnail title of this video are my opinions when you have a raid on James, O Keefe and the New York Times gets wind of that rate. Some one informed the New York Times the raid occurred. Is it possible that people who go rated got raided then called in our times. Let him know it was happening shore, but extremely unlikely. Is it possible that some one who did who is one of these journalists who likely does

have access to privileged communication, invertebrates lawyers leak them to the new times, yeah really unlikely. Is it possible that James, o likely one of the only individuals have access to privileged communications leak them to the New York I'm sorry, I know, is currently in a lawsuit within your times, but maybe there's somebody adverts awesome access to these emails or broken, or did something, and maybe some how the New York Times gained access to them all razor suggest. In the absence of evidence, the solution that makes the least amount of sanctions. Do the correct one. If, on more than one occasion, the New York Times got access to information pertaining to the FBI, it's likely it's, the FBI was leaking it and if documents were seized,

fair tax, and we now know that a federal judge ordered them to stop export trading, the data and somehow privileged legal communications and seven Anthony or times it is likely the F B. I doing it again now absent in the possibility it wasn't, but I think most of us believe it is reasonable to collude. That is the case. I want to be fair and make sure I can frame it and make sure you understand. We don't know exactly who did this we'll Chamberlain he's a lawyer? He treated the FBI rated pride. Very tough on a pretext that is now leaking their privileged communications to the New York Times. This is a scandal. He says these are classic privileged communications project. There, too, asked for a legal opinion on potential journalist activities. That opinion is a privileged communication, no idea what I'm Goldwyn and Whitey was thinking here. He should be subpoenaed tomorrow and forced to

Veal is criminal source. I don't even think that the fact that project virtues is currently litigation with the New York Times makes it all the more appalling, but the New York Times would publish Vera tosses privileged communications If your times has these memorandums, why what It also have project that has a privileged indications that relate directly to project that has a lawsuit against the times This is just a massive massive scandal. The New York Times the lender asked this isn't journalism. This is straight up hey, Adam Goldman your times? Maybe you should have gotten a legal opinion for the House lawyers at the times before you went and published privileged legal advice from an adversarial party Am I e a w W states FBI alleged to have leak project veritable legal memos to New York Times for hit peace alleged alleged that market of justice has been accused of tipping off the New York Times about recent raids on project? Better,

current and former employees. The attorney also the attorney also suggested federal, possibly federal prosecutors, may have leaked the group's legal communications to the newspaper project. Where toss the undercover group, rather by conservative journalist, Jane o has come under fire, has come under the federal scanner over the alleged fact of a diary belonging to President Joe Biden, daughter. Very consider published a diary, so we know the details of that. He didn't. during interview on Fox NEWS, Thursday night. Oh, keeps attorney harm me. And slammed the times report as a hip peace and added to note the dialogue. had leaked illegal memos to the newspaper which would be deemed in it, the ordinary and illegal move. I can't say New York Times got this information, but they got it in a way that is illegal and unethical Dylan Old, Fox NEWS. We have a disturbing situation of the: U S, attorney's office or the FBI tipping off the New York Times to each of the raids on project for us as current and former employees. We know that because minutes after these raids occurred

they got calls on the New York Times, which was the only journalism outlet that knew about it and they published this hit. Peace today, which is really despicable, I don't think I've ever seen this love linear times before to publish people's private legal communications. He added the scandal of epic proportions ever Journalist was not worried about this, should hang up their journalism card and all first Lawyers as well Dylan insisted. I descended over Trevor TIM Trevor. Tim is the executive director, freedom of the press, freedom of the press. He tweeted, I'm sorry, but this is worrying from a press freedom perspective. Unless and until D, O J releases evidence, project practices would direct was directly involved in the theft, because if there is none, then the raids could very well be a violation of the Privacy Protection ACT. he says I know I'm going to get dozens, two dozen replies the sweet sang but o Keefe us on a journalist read the statute. It doesn't matter and I personally like project.

at all, but imagine this was a liberal org under Trump and not a good precedent, and then he says of anger responses to these tweets, but amazingly known as call me after the two glaring typos someone responded. Propaganda is not press possession of and go the crime regardless. Real journalists know that rare to release evidence before the trial. Another thing real journalists, no propaganda, is press. We don't like it. We don't like when CNN lies. We don't like it when good morning America run the states witness allows him to contradict his under oath testimony to undermine the Rittenhouse trial or the perspective into what's happening, but we allow the freedom of the press even for those who do not like. When someone is accused of being propaganda, well, we have to respect the process. The first amendment, the right to the poor, because everyone's got their perspective and opinions, and some people lie, but people are allowed to speak. Lies are protected under the first amendment to certainty to certain degree,

you're not allowed to defame in libel people, but you're allowed to make up some things. I know it's despicable, I'm not of him Of stolen goods is not a crime. You see. This is what these people don't that they may they dont know where they dont care either way they are cogs in a machine cranking out evil. If product veritable through protected journalistic practices came across private information worth something stolen, then they have. They got their lorries, they have conversations about what they do and ultimately project for us turned it over to law enforcement. They did not publish it. They said hey. This should go to the feds are, I believe, local police and apparently there being accused of transporting stolen goods over state lines. I do not believe that progress did anything wrong. Capacity, but you can see when your engaging in the act of journalism they will come for. You we'll talk about reality here.

This is from just a few days ago, after the FBI Rates New York Times, deposition tape number one former attitude page editor says he endeavoured to consider how readers interpret were than an article, but failed to do that. It is not the worst thing in the world. I don't act like that that this this video they ve put out from may have twenty twenty is like the worse than you'll ever see from an organization. But the point is that project verities his adversarial to the New York Times they occur, we investigate and exposing corruption and they are suing the New York Times over defaming them lies a judge, actual RO the New York Times put put opinions in their articles about various us now. I believe that here too, I'm gonna stay undiscovered, meaning its on high, Sir or whatever than all of us. The FBI, raids, o Keefe, all of a sudden, information about the raids is leaked to the New York Times, who he suing and then

later his privilege, legal communications gets leaked to the New York Times. I think we ve seen enough throughout the past several years to know what's happening. I think. Actually, it's not all bad news. Now, it's horrifying what they're doing the James Oak, even private, where tossing scary absolutely. But, as I mentioned earlier, I think it shows the fear, the panic, the ineptitude and the desperation of the deep state of the administrative state of the road political awkward operatives for everyone This is this is this is over. I mean you spy on James, O Keefe normal know about it. James could come on Their spying on me me me, and people would say, you're crazy. Now, James O Keefe comes out and says they rated my home. They took my lawyers, commune Patients, in violation of all committed constitutional rights and legal rights, your right to council and an and privileged indications. They did that because their desperate, because they're losing because they're going to lose

my friends, that is always darkest for the dawn, and I dont know if we're heading in the direction of the sun, rising weakening the assumption that the darkest portion of the night common dawn will be in only a matter of minutes, or we could argue, says the sun setting, and you better expect worse limits fair to say in the next few years. Things are going to get very, very bad. Why look at what happened in the past election with

genuine Pennsylvania, Long Island in New Jersey, the Democrats God oh belittle rated- I mean they just lost, it was bad New Jersey, almost lost. Some people have questions about. What's going up in New Jersey, but there may be a we come. You look at the state senator in New Jersey who spent only hundred forty three bucks and one did even really campaign people just don't want Democrats to win. If people regular people come out, vote locally and win their states and primary NEO cons and establishment. Republicans for populists. This country will recover, the United States will rebound. Life will get better, but the bureaucratic states will spiral they will freak out. They will thrash and lash out, and I believe that we are starting to see

I'm gonna go quietly into the garden and entered into the good night, the not going to give up their going to try and retain power by any means necessary, lying cheating and stealing. No, what happened a project virtuous and one of the scariest things I've seen so far. It is one of the scariest things. Look we ve seen regular people get arrested by cops in their own home we ve seen black lives better, get away with killing people, not all of em, some of them have and we ve seen. Frumps recklessness his unwillingness to invoke the insurrection active, stop riots that were occurring over a hundred days sporadically across the country, but in the Pacific northwest consistently, Yeah lay riots you had, I believe the military the National Guard was was deployed. I think them. I think, army a mature and ate an egg is a quarantine certain areas with a right and without a control they took action to stop the riots

I think we're going to see is in the next few years. Next year I mean we're about to under twenty twenty two campaigning, Sir and it's gonna be getting. Parliament got it going to start beginning for the mid terms, and do you think the Democrats are just going to accept the losing their power do think the establishment will just roll. Over Up or do you think they would do everything in our power to make sure that populist messages do not succeed? You think I do. Power to stop people like James O, Keefe and people. Like me, I certainly think so think. Censorship is just around the corner. The previous elections cycle early. They go after positive Watson, Alex Jones, Lore, loom or mild mile. You not the less prominent voices that were promoting Donald Trump, while they're. Still, our problem places that are promoting market. First nationalism: populism, whatever to varying degrees, not completely or liberty or anti woke. The next cycle that will occur is that, with Ff Alex Jones and and and

other individuals now banned from us. These platforms they'll find new targets, they'll go after Stephen Crowder and they have been. They have been going after Stephen Crowder Strike, strike after strike. Even when you just sites the CDC, though, and looking for an excuse, because he's a powerful prominent voice was going to help someone like Dissatisfied Donald Trump, someone who might actually come in and purge the bureaucratic state, the F b I, for instance,. and then not too far away. Is the work I'm doing I'm in the same reach right now as some higher profile individuals, but were certainly close enough and may be worse.

moderate TIM guest, I rallies of- is a mixed bag of opinions from slightly less too conservative to moderate, and that means regular people on the slots centre left we're in the middle are gonna, hear a lot more conservative opinions and a swipe people at least away from the far left, and that's a problem for the establishment and the accounts. I mean you take a look at Project Lincoln. It was never about the party that was always about the elites who control the system. Project length Lincoln claimed to be principle Republicans opposing truck cause. He was corrupt. Now that Trump is out there. Just ain't Republicans are bad and it just promoting Democrats, because the Democratic Party has become the party of the wealthy and you look at the NEO cons. They ve all rushed over to become Democrats, because that is their path to elite ism. I bring you know the daily mail breaking news. Trumps chief of staff mark meadows now faces criminal contempt of Congress charges for refusing

appear for his January six testimony Ouida conversation with cash Mattel and he was parking about how when you're subpoenaed for these things, it is very, very expensive and some people can't afford it. You have to go and have my for Congress. You gotta get a lawyer, you ve gotta, have legal advice on. You know what you can't can't talk about: that's very, very expensive, so what I was looking over the money where it can afford. Legal representation for something like this. Well, then you're gonna get in trouble we'll get in serious trouble. You will be ripped to shreds in these in these deposition. These hearings and if you refuse to shop, they will charge you criminally. Mark Meadows is facing criminal contempt charges, Steve banners. The house voted to hold back in contempt, will see

Look this January six committee issues ten more subpoenas, including to Stephen Miller and Cayley Makin, any gaily MAC and any it's not about anything meaningful, what the January six Committee is doing is using the process as punishment. They are consuming your time Your mind on your money, make sure you're off base. They want to make sure you can't do work, We want to make sure that by supporting you, they jam you up to it. We were you cannot be effective, that's what they're doing and their draining resources, because their funded by the government and they can just do it. The reason I bring us up in the context of James O Keefe is because I believe we are witnessing the rise that italian state has been happening for some time I mean nine eleven. The patriot act is real bad things Andy a indefinite detention provision under Barack Obama. All of these things, seemingly seemingly meaningless, the

The government can just say, oh by the way we have the right to a rescue in violation of the constitution and your likely doubt that stupid you never win in court than Brok. Obama goes and kill some american citizens that charge or trial and says yeah well too. and I remember lukashka, you know from Morocco, with a minor he'd, be smitten guess on the show, frequently. He once interviewed. I believe it was sitting. Charlie Gibbs could begin IRAN Peter gives, or ever somebody Morphia Bomb Administration has said after Obama killed an american citizen, he said yeah well, I should have a better dead. Amazing, I believe, is what is I should act, should have a better did Barack Obama. No one stop them was charged criminally got away with it. That's where we are and its escalating when at the point where the feds will go after opposition politics, but political factions

James O Keefe doesn't engage in policy debates, he's just gotta perspective, ITALY's conservative and he goes after everybody. He exposed the Epstein cover up from ABC These cover ease, exposed, nursing homes, scandals completely unrelated any political institution, because project very tough, does undercover reporting and look at Wikileaks where they do journalistic they receive information, they publish it like any other news organization, and for that Julian Assange is rotting in prison for alike or is it going on eight years or so? Well, I should say he was ecuadorean embassy because you don't flood, we are dealing with evil, they ve

power of our institutions a long time ago and not completely just enough and good people. Good men did nothing as the saying goes. So I tell you know there is a path towards purging the corrupt and is very very simple. You must be peaceful, persuasive and resourceful January. Six was the biggest misstep by trumpet supporters ever it gave the establishment all of the fuel they needed, deploy tens of thousands of national guard and bolster federal law enforcement, now they're expanding the capitol police nationwide, because violence is a trick. We are not in the one thousand six hundred of the 1700s, we were in fourth and fifth generation of warfare, peaceful persuasive, resourceful tactics of the only that work. You know, I know Donald Trump won.

People voted for him, and now you have a narrative that voting is pointless. That's a lie and that's wrong: don't let people make you believe it because Young can one in Virginia? Is it perfect? No other Republican is a Publican party. Can save you know, but it is a step in the right direction. It's a victory, a major victory. The next thing you need to pay attention to as you watch this go down you must vote in your local elections, find out who your state senator as your state rep is vote for people who believe in freedom When these legislators we are closer to a potential convention of states. Maybe not a perfect solution, but the very least your steak and then pass laws to protect your rights primary. The income Thence republican Democrat or otherwise even listen and the Democratic Party of the progressive insurgency in the Republican Party of the populist insurgency

and the Libertarian Party of the Measles caucus change is coming, then I believe we are on track to win, but the night is always darkest for the dawn, which is to say, expect worse, but stay vigilant, vote locally. Look the mid terms are coming up active in these primaries, and hopefully things don't result in national divorce or anything. You know violent. Hopefully that never happens because I've already bad enough to see what's happening in the streets and Kenosha and what might happen now at the front of the Rittenhouse case,. We gotta make sure we throw our support behind project. Very so make sure you guys are helping support them, but you know, but we got a project project tossed out com and you can make donations project dictators to help them fight their legal battles. as they may be, one of the only true journalistic enterprises in the United States right now occupying attention- and I hope you are speaking out or forever hold your piece things will get worse

if we all stand up right now. If everyone did, they get better overnight. Let's winsome elections, let's take back control of our respective states let's, let's, let's primary the incumbent, crony establishment and bring in real real Kennedy to represent us and prove the american system works, and we will not let these corrupt contests destroyed, Alida their necks segments coming up tonight at eight p m over at Youtube COM slashed him cast iron. Well, thanks ran up and I'll see you all them where the states key witnesses one of the perpetrators of the attack on CALL Rittenhouse gauge gross crates appeared on good morning, America and then CNN, to clarify this months he made, while he was under oath in his new

statements he's basically saying he didn't point a weapon at Kyle Rittenhouse, and he did this on national television and they let him do it to be fair. on CNN Anderson Cooper SAD, I'm gonna play the clip from the trial, and I respect it because in the from the trial. The defence says it wasn't until you pointed your weapon at Kyle right now, advanced on him with your hands down gun pointed Adam. He shot you in that video gauge Gross Great says yes, and that is under oath Now appears on tv and says no, I didn't and worship leave him worse. Still. Many people will believe him. I believe, Good morning America Interview was was gross misconduct on apart the press and First CNN: I actually think they did a good job. Now the dude still went on tv, untried lion, but good on Anderson Cooper for playing the clip, because I think

We ve got to rely on people to understand the truth that tribal lists are still gotta deflect and be like I see you know the Butler defence, strict him or something, but I think there's a big difference, between being under oath and being on tv. We can say whatever you want good morning, America, that's that's what is basically told by what together Pastrana. What ivory goes? I give you say whatever you want your you're safe here and he's like, oh god and point the gun Adam, yet because not gonna, get charged for perjury for lying lined tv, but stand when this dude admittedly pointed a weapon at Kyle Rittenhouse. Yet that is under Oath again, I will stress- I will stress in the inner with the wood CNN Anderson Cooper says I want to play the clip from the trial and, let's, if twitter loads it it's not loading it whenever you at the point you actually plays the clip. Now is a few things

that need to be addressed as far as it goes with media lies and how the court's been manipulating and cheating, and I think one of the big stories Now is how many leftists are waking up to the truth. You see. Someone like gauge gross rights going on tv and lying. It may keep some of the UN. cease, trapped and bubble world. Where Only here the lies in the nonsense, but a lot of reg. People. A lot of leftist alot of progressive had been watching the trial and seeing them on Twitter has been shocking. Notably, we talk about an experience, but now we have a bunch of other We have smaller twitter users and we have high profile verified account saying I was wrong and I'm sorry This is the way the culture war has been working. there are those of us who know the truth. They they will kill. In the media that anybody who says the truth is right. Wing they'll accused me of beef,

right wing when I'm clearly not politically right wing but as they continue to draw the dividing line, and between honesty and deception, and say that honesty is right. Wing a deception is left wing. Well then, I guess sure what is left and right really mean- I mean we're- talking about economics or a car progressive, issued a progressive versus traditional issues. Cultural issues then left Bigley means D, a typically means like command economy, centralized control by the government and The glee means Progressive ISM and the right to block typically means free market enterprise, decentralization and liberty, and only thing that makes sense in the big picture, because there are left libertarians, but but if we are really talking about the culture, war then I can tell you this is the reason why they accuse me of being right Wing Scientology to tell the truth. Kyle Rittenhouse was acting in self defence. That means you're right wing.

Oh now. All of these leftist are starting to watch the trial in their like. While we were wrong- and therein lies the big problem that we have in this country, the press is unsolvable, they are evil, despicable people who seek to destroy and cause harm, and they have allies because it is not just the media. is the cult in the bigger picture. Let me let me bring something down for you. I made a tweet it was meant to make a point, but some people gonna photos funny. I said people keep trying to cheer on this Canosa guy. He shows up to canosa from from far away with gone he's, not a legally allowed to possess, telling everybody he's an empty and he's there to provide aid, and then he ends up attacking people with his gun. Of course, I'm talking about gauge growth rates, not Kyle, Rittenhouse Gauge Christ, was from forty or so miles away, shows

to a riot with a gun he's, an illegal possession of claiming, is an empty when he's not, and then he attacked people, yet they don't say that on the left, not here to talk about all. I will point out Those similarities between Karen US engage growth, but it's important. The media doesn't do it. The media he sang the let alone survivor in the womb did empty. Zombie empty Apparently, the empty licence expired like four years ago, so, three years before the events in question, I don't know that for sure that's just preliminary information has come out through various reports. So I won't be major, I'm being clear, because I didn't actually go into the database and then ask the that the courts or whatever if his paper work is legal, but it's not an empty he's. Isn't he's he's at as empty as Kyle written House is. Take a look at this report, some more tweet and show you what's going on in the trial there were several attempts to lie and cheat on the part, the prosecution and so on. I talk about

some of the media all good morning, America allowing this gotta go on tv and lie good morning, America. Also called cow, written ass, a murderer and delete between, but I will talk about other prosecute and also these are evil people. We must not look past. I'd say something like never a tribute to malice that which can be explained by incompetent, scald handling razor, I still see, and by headlines razor. However, the point about what can be explained by incompetence. This is the important point, never a tribute to malice that which can be explained by incompetence you cannot explain the prosecutions, multiple attempts at violating the constitution and admitting false evidence as incompetence. Incompetence is full once shame on you for me twice. Shame on me in competence is like this do made a clear mistake when the process, when the prosecutors told explicitly do not admit that as evidence

and then he dies, does not incompetence that is wilfully violating a court ruling and getting admonished for it. And then, when yelled, when he questions drew her end as the other day during a journalist- and he says, you say you're a journalist, but you put out opinion Andrews like White me like lead to the judge like what what what what is this the prosecution trying to bring political bias in a trial with a fact witness who has testified to what they saw their bias meaningless there and oath, regardless of their biased. They ve made a fact statement you think they're lying about. It then bring perjury charges, but this is what they do. Evil people have been in broaching in our institutions. Let me show you this image. This is gauge growth rates,

who showed up to a riot with a gun. He was an illegal possession of who is not an empty. Who is a revolutionary, therefore poet. Purposes was sad. Long live the revolution who attacked Kyle Rittenhouse, with no knowledge of what had happened. I want to stress this point for everybody. They say things like, he was trying to stop a mass shooter definitively proved in court. Not true gauge gross creates testified. He didn't about any shooting he didn't witness any shooting. He had no reason to believe that current now had committed any shooting all he knew according to his own testimony was that car right now said he was working with the police and basis that information alone. He ran Adam and pulled out a gun and pointed at him. Now it is not true. Power now never said he was working with the police, but gauge gross crates. In multiple police statements- said that's what he thought so in his frame of mind. He was thinking police

form- and I will pull out my gun and attack is narrative- is is of stopping a mass shooter is bunk now in his testimony he set it up, a large caliber rife London picking here a little bit, because a tutor is not a very large caliber caliber rifle the reason why we use five so to two three and five six or interchangeable. There the same rounds. I believe five six has higher chamber pressure, so typically faster higher velocity and things like that. But there are a table, meaning they look almost identical the size of the round. The again, the pressure, I believe, is different. You can't put a five hundred and fifty six in a two hundred and twenty three, but you can put a two hundred and twenty three in a five hundred and fifty six. That being said, it is not a very large caliber rifle. Two hundred and twenty three, and we will use five hundred and fifty six typically because in war and combat you want to be able to carry more rounds you're being that these are particularly powerful and being,

to fire more rounds is better than being up the fire one big round that you can see in the image. many many more rounds that are much much larger than the next. I believe, oh, you know fair common round a three await or seven six two are: particularly larger, so wages device, Large caliber rifle. In fact, when it comes to a rifle two three is particularly small. Now, I'm not gonna, say it's seventeen you know super mag or whatever their their very small, but they do have high velocity Melick vaporize, a beaver whenever a gradual where is your firing upon? But there s not a very large caliber rifle Susan Attempt, in my opinion, adjust its final NIT picking because not the biggest issue in the world, but this is one exam of how they try to pull a fast one on the jury, they try, to lie to manipulate the jury, which brings me to the next most important thing that happened, the other and again I want to stress two: I got a bunch of stuff to show. You have left us aging. They were wrong and Kyle written House is not guilty in. Why don't I'll show that? But I gotta

throughout the prosecution is trying to lie, cheat steal and how this whole system is is let this be evidence my, and of how they lie to you in the press from legal insurrection, Rittenhouse trial day, eight prosecutions lie desperate lunge for evidence of guilt final day of evidence, this is an enhanced images purporting to show Kyle's provocation. Here's the image in question: can you see anything? can a prime you for what this images. I am not going to tell you what this images take. A look on the screen You tell me what you see and you know what people will say have no. idea what that is because in reality, you dont. So this is the image that was admitted, which is fake, a fake image. That's right! Let me explain: a drone had been filming the night in question,

The prosecution got if only the previous week, it was admitted into evidence. You don't really see much of anything new on the drone footage. However, the prosecution having now a grainy incomprehensible bit of footage purported. They they claimed to the jury that it shows Kyle renounced pointing his weapon at people before he was attacked by Joseph Rosen, Bondman Znamensky, who was armed and in fact you can't see anything in this video. Now here's work. That's really important. The original image face is a crop from a video and it is very blurry and grainy, because the drums was too far away to actually see anything. The we on the left is an artificially enhanced image using a computer algorithm that injected information. That is not from the video the defense was capable enough to explain to the judge why this should not be admitted, and it should not be, but because they

explain simply to the judge it and I'm getting admitted it is a desperate Hale marry that I don't think will convince the jury of anything because you literally can't see anything, but it is talking to me how the prosecution used fabricated evidence and it is shot to me the judge allowed. It is shocking to me. The defence did not have the wherewithal to explain its, not a real image. Let me explain: Pixels, you not pixels our great I'm using for K monitors which, as I was, the exact number like two thousand one hundred eighty or whatever pixels in one direction, but let's go buy? You know like ten ATP, ten, eight ten, eighty one thousand eighty pixels little tiny dots that broadcast a color and when all of these colours come together, you get your computer screen.

alright. I will simplify that I want to. I want to explain some of the nitty gritty that they tried to explain, but I can simplify this for you in a second, what the defense kept saying, which is very confusing to the layman. Is that when you use or a winning out the rhythmic manipulation on these images to enlarge them. Pixels are added to the image. He asked the export for the prosecution. What color pixel is being added I don't know he said I dont know how the algorithm works, but it's a forensic software. We use. Ok, so then that if the execution says to the judge, your honor, with all due respect that offences trying to manipulate it, trying to use your ignorance of technology against you to prevent you from using what is simply an enlarged image lie in the, I said I don't understand. Ok, we'll let the jury decide I'll, make it very but for all of you to understand how evil these people are.

Before you is our two images one is bigger than the other. The image on the right is a collection of data. It is it is it is it each pixel as it is, is information. The information comes from light on August, twenty fifth light reflecting off of surfaces hits a sensor on a camera which records those patterns. The recording is one hundred percent from the night in question. The image to the left, which was admitted into evidence, is not from the night in question. In fact, it contains a substantial amount of data that did not come from light hitting a sensor on the day in question, that is to say, it is no different than if you were to take the

On the right and draw a picture of Kyle Rittenhouse and say this is my interpretation of what it was. The expert couldn't testify as to how the image came into existence. He doesn't know The prosecution should have brought in an expert who could testified to what the algorithm does they didn't. It should not have been admitted now. is the image on the left, a fax simile of the actual Knighton question. Yes effect, simile, meaning it is fairly complicated but simple to save the defence, could have gone to the expert, witness and say the image you are attempting to present in court. Is it a photograph or video from the night in question and he would have Add know very well. That simple was the information collected in this image from the night in question, some of it. Some of it is this a complete photograph

containing only information from the night in question. No, it's not your honor than. Why is this evidence? It is not an image from the night in question it. It is effectively an artist rendition and it is Just because someone is an algorithm to manipulate a photo and dates. Doing that to claim that characterises pointing weapon it people. In fact, if you look at the image and see the sign. There's a big white sign right in the blurry image, because the sensor actually drop. Some of that information you can see it is fairly easily defined in the image in the enhanced version, there's a weird go. Sign appearing behind it, shocking to me that the defence did not have the wherewithal to simply say the image attempting to pre presented. Two to the jury. Your honor is not a photograph of the night in question it.

a computer rendering from last week of what a computer thanks may have occurred. It is not a video of the night in question fiscal spirit, prosecution pulled a fast one. Let me show you stop. This is great raw egg nationalist now did show some of these posts yesterday, but I want to just highlight the stuff again: Cerebellar Berwick tweeted. I am a highly educated, highly educated in a reasonably perceptive and it was only that I learned that the cow Rittenhouse victims were white. My progressive bubble made the seem like a very different case than it is in this image. Was posted. I don't know I was originally posted, but patriots doubt whether Donald Trump form had it hear me, roar, says Kyle right now, I am sorry, I unfairly judge do and thought you were a racist watching parts of the trial we're both humbling and horrifying. When this happened months ago I was a sheep, I watch CNN and bought what they were selling. I truly believe

that title with some raises kid: that drove across state lines to a faraway places. A are two F asked: F is up for issue and and and and giggles at a peaceful veolan protest. I believe that the open fight and killed innocent black that were rightfully and peacefully protesting there right for equality. This week I lie I was lied to about what really happened a lot. I am horrified an embarrassed my ignorance and unwillingness to recognise propaganda? The past several have opened my eyes to a lot of things, and for that I am grateful, but I will only car Rittenhouse, my deepest and sincerest apologies. Take a look at us from Bill Eichmann. He said ass night Neri and I watched several hours of cholera now directs testimony and cross examination. We came, We believe in that Kyle is telling the truth and that he acted in self defence. Found him to be a civic minded patriot, with a history of helping as community as an empty and firemen, and in his removing hate graffiti earlier that day, from a local school and ultimately envy.

And tearing to protected business during the night of the rights and Canosa, our first and oppression of Kyle we're materially different from those we had pray we formed based on media reports and opinion pieces we had consumed. I have always been frustrated to read and inaccurate press report about a subject. I know why Yet somehow I continue to believe other articles in the same newspaper about subjects are no less well media, nickel biased are dividing our country destroying lives. While we have not heard the entire trial based on assessment of Kyle understand. We believe that he will be found innocent by the giraffe stress. This further understand, juries. Don't find you innocent, they find you not guilty, but typically but people when people innocent verdict. That means the jury realises that this person is innocent and says not guilty on all counts, usually when someone says- guilty there, like you, haven't proven your case beyond reasonable doubt. If a jury colloquially fought, hasn't innocence, verdict, that's when they truly believe a miscarriage of justice is is occur.

you didn't say I encourage you to watch the trial or at minimum his testimony and cross examination before you form a view of his guilt or innocence with respect to my own political bias. I M not a gun owner nor member of Vienna re unbalance. I support stronger gun regulations and removing loopholes in the sale of gun. Loss. Unfortunately that societies view of cows innocence depends more on one's views about gun control, rather than what actually took place in August. Carteret NASA's life is at risk. Justice demands a fair trial. Society would benefit greatly of politics, did not enter the courtroom and convict innocent people, and now the kicker just got a call from the media asking if my twitter account was hacked. That is the reporter. Couldn't conceive of the idea that I could believe Kyle is innocent because I am not a right wing crazy. Now, I'm sorry bill. Ackerman Nazi were familiar with it,

Agnes other than he is a you know he left kind of individual. You are right wing when I watched them up in the night in question and I brought in, I think, we'd what five witnesses on TIM cast IRA remit- maybe maybe maybe five yet we ve had wholly arrested on the show we ve had Richie Mcguinness. We fed drew her nand as we ve had. We had shall be TAT got. and man, who am I I know, I'm forgetting, I'm forgetting somebody, but what we had. I believe five different witnesses and I apologize for getting four hundred and forty four getting who else we did have in the show who's the witness, but they also and I said, based on the eyewitness, testimony and video evidence, I believe, believe at conferences acting in self defence. The media immediately try to use that to smear me and they put it. My Wikipedia page thanked him pool openly defended car right now. I know what the goal of that is. because they were lined people claiming that car right now did things. He did not do

this day the media is still lying, but people at a chance to watch the trial and other waking up even anarchist. the young Turks that I was wrong. These leftist on Twitter. All like. I can't believe how wrong I was, and to this day you get people Thank you for the young Turks saying things like critical race theory is not being taught in schools when have the national, a major teachers union literally publishing why we teach critical race theory in schools, because Genk Huger knows is only opportunity is to lie with the young Turks. To now add I admit it. She was wrong about our readiness and respected. I absolutely do and I hope more people on the left wake up because I don't care about. politics on economic policy. You talk about Universal health care absolutely, but we have to start from a place of telling the truth. First now look at Universal health care. I've law,

been a supporter of that an environmental regulations and and and policies of a similar nature, but their becomes a big challenge. When the government when the establishment, political powers and the media lie, I dont believe centralizing power over our health care in the hands of the government would be a good thing. I believe they will use that to harm people, in which case as much as I would prefer a basic level of health health care for everyone. a decentralized system is better, which brings me to my more modern view on how we could have universal health care about your system. Everybody pay taxes, some people pay more taxes than others because, make more money or whether a progressive tax system and then you receive of sure and you're able to go to privately run hospitals and they and when you go for help,

there. You have government funding for that healthcare, but you can choose to go wherever you want. That creates market competition, but the ability of everyone to get access, not a perfect solution, not a permanent all, and maybe it. What the fact is giving the government final say in how all of our healthcare is done would be a disaster and I'm learning because I'm watching the lies, the cheating and stealing and people we need to wake up to decimated to wake up. Others share this video with people you'd, who don't realize. What's going on, watch freedom tunes go to freedom and look at the latest video that he put out about Joseph Rosenbaum, the man who died that night. He had committed atrocities against children and it's very important. You understand this. I can't say the crimes committed against a child, because you do would probably give me a strike or or do something negative as video, because Joseph Rosenbaum had just got out of

until hospital. He was sent to prison for fifteen years for committing the most serious crime you can commit against a child short of taking their life an hour- arguably maybe even not maybe the most serious crimes against child. Wait till you, we'd snoops, you think I'm Jochen, you think, I'm being facetious. None on an earl! You go red slopes about Joseph rose in Bonn and you will throw up after reading about who this guy is and what he had done, and people need to understand that detail alive at their necks migrants coming up come on this channel. Thanks, Franco, Mossy Alban, where the most contentious aspects of a cow Rittenhouse case is the gun charge, because many progressives leftists are saying no matter what happened that night, no matter who is at fault Kyle redness as guilty, because you is in the process

committing a crime, and self defense does not apply in this regard wrong, not true, and if that was true, there wouldn't even be a trial. But, ladies and gentlemen, we have big news. Sort of it appears. The judge has agreed, Finally, with the defence that Cairo Rittenhouse was legally allowed to keep and bear that rifle which actively means at well. It should be tossed up with he stopped short answer? he was going to provide his instructions to the german authorities and to provide the defences request for instruction to the jury. I dont know if this means the defensive one across the board, but it certainly seems like based on the rhetoric the judge has provided. He is when two states he is going to give in reactions to the jury, which say take who consideration that provide that says: the law only applies if you are under the age of sixteen ok. I gotta

down. Here I got some tweets to show you. I got an art, call from Anjou Braga the injustice of the gun charge against Kyle Rittenhouse. This goes out coward, I was very well. Maybe I could have all charges, but I don't think the judge is right to toss the whole charge. I think the judge wants to give a full set of instructions to the jury, and there was a lot going on you you're gonna love is the state said to the judge. Your honor the law makes no sense, and the judge said makes no sense you're out of luck. How is regular person supposed to live their life if the law as red makes no sense. In which case, how could a judge instructed Jerry? enforce a lot. It makes no sense against someone who is abiding by the statutes of the long story short. We have all long since argued that gun charge against car house is incorrect. Initially, after nine question I said

the law. Plainly reads: you cannot have a dangerous weapon under the age of eighteen and and I said, if he's in the process of command Prime, I don't think he's going to have a strong defence, because someone might say he was committing a crime. I was wrong talk to x, It's a they said, read the exemptions. Only if you are under sixteen amazing now This may actually be a technicality that the law was broken, but I do think you can read the law and understand as its being drafted, what the legislate Wisconsin meant when they created this law. To put it simply a log its drafted and says you, have a weapon under the age of eighteen, a dangerous weapon and let it go the committee and they all discuss it. And someone says what about of unborn hunting with my kid, your kid could be. Twelve and they say ok I'll, run over if you're supervising your kid in your hunting. This won't apply to you and someone said come on my

sixteen. Seventeen year old kid can't go out and hunt its Wisconsin has tons of rural areas as it. So you have to be. In violation of both of those provisions. Basically, it makes sense, meaning if you are under my understanding, if you're fifteen, but with your dad or parent hunting, you can bear up berrigan if your fifteen and with your dad in the middle of a street with a rifle. You can't, if you're sick, seen or seventeen you are allowed to bear. A long gone Let me show you some of what's going on this all breaking right now. I D push back my normal recording schedules sitting here. Listening to the live testimony- and it looks really really good for Kyle right now check it out. I work racking Andrew Braga commentary. Here, I think he is actually one of the best is an expert on self defence and he's got a full breakdown of the gun charge. So I am read to you the injustice of the gun charge. You may have act. I did talk what other day but

extremely relevant, because this could pull the rug out from the entire case than one of the block many leftist have come out. Progressives Democrat. Whenever saying, I real I was wrong about tile written ass. He was defending himself, but two contain the narrative. What we're seeing from still many anti of activists, because they want to win, is yeah he was a legally possessing a weapon. Many people on twitter certainly said crossing state lines with a gun, not true. He did not do that and so once the news became irrefutable evidence that okay are you, he didn't cross state lines of the gun, they changed it to. He cross state lines and illegally obtained a gun. No, he did not law self Defense Andrew Brock at Wheaton. I wanna go to some these tweets, because I want to show you some with a state was saying it's amazing. Looking like

drug Schroeder is going to toss the gun charge. That would be the correct decision on these facts. The only correct decision on discharge on these facts- the judge is not biased. I wish she was the left, keep saying he's biased the judge didn't throw the charge up. He just said he's gonna give the jury the full statute, the jury, is likely going to acquit, but the judge as a question of law should say: Kyle's, not Sixteen, this lock it you can charged with a crime. Its remarkable think about it. This way it was a law that said in order to be sure with jaywalking you'd have to cross the street while not in across. walk and then the state charges you with I'm of jaywalking and tells the judge he was in the crosswalk bites was at the wrong light. How can you charge them with, crime. When you know it does not apply to what just happened,

Let me read more this from Andrew Braga rouse the eighty eight says, if you accept that MRS Reding of the gun law. The law makes no sense, and the judge says if it makes no sense. You state are out of luck. The law does make sense. It's not hard to understand. The problem is judges. Sitting up there, not biased, trying to understand both arguments and then the laws being read by the defence accurately, it says, there's too provisions, you must be in violation of and written us was not. The law was specifically rapid, with exemptions, think about it, this way, if you're under the age of eighteen, you can't have a hand if you're under the age of eighteen, but at least sixteen or seventeen, You can have a long gun they. Let us put this. Why are you familiar with? Romeo and Juliet laws, you as an adult, cannot engage in indulge activity

someone under the age of eighteen in many states how ever most states then have a provision called a row me oh and Juliet law, which states if the person is within exe, MT of years of the individual. This law shall not apply. To put it simply if you, eighteen years old, and you re mature adult and you are having a d relations with someone who is seventeen, a minor in many states the strict reading. The law is your abusing a child, but we ve crap. Romeo and Juliet laws because we're like dude if the guy's one month, than his girlfriend. That is not abusing a child, and these cases have come up, which is why we have crafted these exemptions. I'm never going of it going over store out of Illinois. We A guy was like six months old man and his girlfriend. They were both seventeen, but the family hated the guy the day he turned eighteen,

and their daughter was still seventeen. They called the police and the police said of strict reading the law states, if your over the age of eighteen, engaging in adult activities, are summit under the age of eight Jeanne you have committed the crime of statutory, you get the point, and it's a travesty of justice, one crafted the law expecting an eighteen year old and seventeen year old, with only a few months of each other's birth. They took to to do tat. No one. No one believed that that should be a crime. In fact, in some states its three years, meaning an eighteen year old, committing a fifteen year old, I'm kind of like that's it, that's pushing it, isn't it or a nineteen year old in a sixteen year old or twenty euro than a seventeen year old than once, you're eighteen, it's off to the races, but exemptions are added to the law. After the fact law will say something specific. What the defence I'm sorry, but the prosecutors trying to do is instead

to the jury, to ignore the relevant portion of the law. The judge is not having it. She refused to the defence said. I argue, the hunting language is. relevant simply says there is an exception period. Our client qualifies for that exception, and the judge said it does say that. This is why I think it's it's it's annoying when the left is like the judges biased. If the judge was biased, he litter the greater the defence, the gun charge should be thrown out and then doesn't throw it out. He's gonna give it to the jury, Kraus the deep throughout the process says, the title of the statutes has person under eighteen and even then the judge says the rubric title is not part of the statute. I don't even know why I have to keep saying it over and over again, but I think this is very, very significant at this point. It should be clear to everyone from the ghetto

There's an exception in the law, so that a sixteen and seventeen year old can bear a right. full on their own. Why? Because a sixteen or seventeen year old can go about finding themselves and their property or hunting. we're going to the range, and not only that Cow Rittenhouse testified at the reason believed he was legal legally allowed to possess. The rifle in Wisconsin not purchase, but possess was because police told them that now. Ignorance of the law is not an excuse for breaking it, but I certainly think at this point the judge should have just tossed it out. Your tongue, me the reason you have the rifles, because a pull your told by officers you are allowed to yes, and when you showed up to this night in question, the police said hi thanks for being here. Yes, every step of the way strict reading the law says as someone who was seventeen Europe, this lights, it specifically does the law does not apply to you. I tell you what man this is crazy.

so the judge says is the work. Is confusing My intent is to submit what defence submitted their gun charge. Jury instruction state must prove under eighteen and that Dangerous weapon was a rifle shot, gun, etc. Ok, the defences instruction was to look at the relevant exemptions right. I want to break down for everybody I know I've talked a lot about this. We're gonna go in depth on the self defence as it relates. Whether he has a gun illegally on a red you. What what us and you broke out law of self defence has to say about this. we can just stop the arguments, because I go on twitter and all these left us like yeah. Well, he illegally had gone so, therefore, no there wouldn't be a trial. If that was true, and was illegal. Anyone know what that's a question of law for the judge or question effect for the jury. It's not definitive,

although I think it's fair to say it is definitive. I'm saying the judge did not say as such and still won't give it up from legal insurrection in an article titled the injustice of the gun charge against Kyle Rittenhouse. First, he right self defense applies to miles most serious criminal charges. The primary legal defence raised by Kyle Self is self defence that legal defence of self defence is applicable. Rapidly to the charge of first degree, intentional homicide of Anthony Huber count three of the criminal complaint against Rittenhouse, with a mandatory life sentence and attempt first degree. Intentional homicide engage gross, creates the legal defence of self defence is also applicable, albeit indirectly, to the job, the first degree, reckless homicide of Joseph Rosenbaum Count count one sixty years and first agreed. Reckless endangered of unknown male jump, kick man in that a justified use of force against tended target is by law unnecessary and reasonable, and therefore not reckless and both of those men were actively attacking witnessed

therefore, presumably intended targets of his use of force right now. What we're talking about the bigger picture here is the jury instructions, because the question of law is for the judge. He then tells the jury if the law state and so These provisions read them, then you must determine whether or not the burden of proof has been met by the state and, if you but eve beyond reasonable doubt he's guilty than you can choose guilty or not guilty. If the jury is, instructions which include a provision that says you if you are under you are sixteen or seventeen it doesn't apply to you effectively than the jury has to come back with a not guilty verdict reads the more he said ah, and also clarify to their arguments as to the lesser included charges. So their say. Ok, it's not a first degree martyr. Is it a second if it first to be reckless homicide. Is it second degree or first to be reckless endangerment, the crazy thing about this, because the judges not biased the judge was like

For the jury to decide and he's basically saying that if someone attacks you and you have a gun to defend yourself and you fire, you are being you- you are potentially reckless, because you fired you're gone without checking your surroundings. I think that's insane. The defence argued if you are acting in self too, and you do not create a reckless circumstance and they're trying to argue attempted reckless endangerment and the defence was like. How can you attempt to be reckless anyway? Let's keep reading about the self defense, they say. It somewhat more ambiguous to what extent the legal defence of software covers the charge of first to be rather endangering with respect to journalists, Richard Mcguinness, good for twelve years, who is somewhat behind Rosen Bomb and arguably endangered by the gunfire does, of course criminal wrecked this requires. The risk created be an unjustified risk, but justified risk is not sufficient, in which case Rittenhouse wasn't trying to hurt Ricky Mcguinness, which it Mcguinness did not fear covert. Nothing did not fly

Kyle read now fired only to stop the threat before him. He was justified in his use of force. I do not believe, and I'm friends with Richie he's a good dude and I do not believe he was intentionally put in danger on glad He'S- ok, but he clearly scared of Kyle, because he knew Kyle being attacked. It goes on to say the relevant question in the case of Mcguinness. was endangerment. Charge will be whether the risk great words Mcguinness was unjustified and therefore reckless. We get it and big. U S, gun charge and treacherous jury instruction check it out. He says They still leaves one charge, count: six, the possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under eighteen, underneath for eight point. Six. A too This is a mere misdemeanor charge is punishable by up to nine months in jail. The gun charge has indeed become a sticky wicket, largely because of the alleged em duty, credible, Wisconsin legislature in drafting the statute by

failure of the relevant content, criminal jury instructions to accurately reflect the plane statutory language and by the fact that none of the prosecution- in the case, pause here and say in terms of this right now Initially, it seemed that the judge was only going to allow a jury instructions on be based on the two eight standard statutory reading and not include the exemptions. It now appears that judge said he's going to give the defences of version of the jury instruction, which will include the exemptions and likely result in an acquittal complicated now a lawyer- and I may be getting this wrong, but based on everything, I've read and I've been hearing from other lawyers and what the judge himself said. It seems like he's inclined to defend the defence, perhaps by over the weekend, he issue, his his hard rolling and provide that to the defence for their arguments.

Monday, he says because of cows claim of self defence compelling against a fairly charges against him is irrelevant, compel companion S a fairly large against them limit levies it omitted because of cows. Come of self defence is irrelevant as a defence and sport. MR meaner charge. There is no self defense justification for wilfully, violating a gun, possession law section to a, which is what the defence wants to be a rich red strictly with nothing else. Any person under eighteen years of age who possesses, or I was under the dangerous weapon is guilty of a class, a misdemeanor, if that was the only statutory language, it applies to Kyle's, pretty much an opening chuck conviction, he was admit the under eighteen and it was in possession of an eight hour, fifteen style rifle, which certainly qualifies Wisconsin laws are dangerous weapon. Indeed, the jury instruction that has been drafted specifically reflects this apparent simplicity of construction, and that's why it's important, let me see if I can pull up this tweet

where the judge says, I'm looking for looking forward looking for it did it to do. The judge set tat is to submit what defence submitted their gun charge jury instruction statement. prove under eighteen, the dangerous weapons, a rifle shock on, etc, etc, and you progress has very can using, but it sounds like what he sang is. The defences version will be given to the jury, and thus the judge agrees with the defence check it out. You really says the symbolism. the construction, the jury defining for the jury, elements that the state must prove beyond reasonable doubt to find a verdict of guilty. The defendant possess an object. The object was a dangerous weapon. These are both true. The defendant had not attack, in the age of eighteen years. At the time he she allegedly possess a dangerous up, and all of those are troops as again affects the entire analysis. Cows guilty. However, that is not the entire legal analysis, there's more, it is founded in the same statute and paragraph three c. It says the section applies

only to a person under eighteen years of age who possesses where's armed with a rifle or shot gun. If the person is not in compliance with ass, twenty three or four end: twenty nine, five, nine three so unless Kyle was not in compliance that is violating these provisions that gun statute would seem to not apply to him at all and the judge seems to agree. So what are these provisions? He says the second of those twenty five, nine three sets out the conditions that. be met to be certified to engage in certain hunting activities. With respect to these can The state correctly points out that Kyle has not met any of these conditions and therefore, they argue is not in compliance. The first offense counter argument here could be the twenty nine five hundred and ninety three applies to hunt activities in car was not engaged not to activities. Therefore it not, it won't applied with circumstances. In fact, the defence literally said judge we can see it on all the hunting charges. But here's what's important, he says practice stronger counter argument is the plane. Reading

Of 3C says it applies only if the person is not in compliance with two thousand three hundred and four and twenty nine five hundred and ninety three does not read, or that means both must be in violation so even if Kyle can be said to be not in compliance with the hunting provision. Was he also not in compliance with the other provision in twenty nine three for we see that it is also a hunting related statute, but one that involves restriction. On hunting and the use of firearms by persons under sixteen years of age wait a minute. How can Kyle not be in compliance? The statute that only applies to a person under sixteen. He was, after all, seventeen. Well, that's precisely the position of the defence. Basically, you must be in violation of the first one hunting and a second one. Under six. In its it's, it's not entirely clear, but I think I can reasonably determine and I think, a fair person what what The legislature was trying to say is if you're sixteen,

contain you can bear a rifle if you're under the age, sixteen hunting under supervision. You can bear you, can you can have a weapon? Otherwise you can't have a weapon under the on. What would you know under the these specific ages. So, if you're, not in violation, operate this way, if your fifteen years old, and you are not hunting you are now I'm confusing myself on this one, to put it simply a cat, you can't be not in compliance if he is exempt.

he cannot be in compliance with SS twenty, three or four if he cannot be complies with twenty nine, three or four he is exempt from nine four eight point. Six eight to the judge agreed now be fair. I think the law makes no sense. I think it was written poorly. I think it was written very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very poorly, and I think the general assessment is that if you're sixteen or seventeen you can have a long gone and the police even seem to think so, that's what our renounced testified to now, just because the cops at its legal it mean it is, but I too, I think it would be a travesty of justice for the law to read as it is, and for that to be used to criminally prosecute out right now, two thousand and seventeen. I don't think it's relevant for the most part to the case. I think we're talking about the loss of life and self defense, so you have to be in violation of both of these provisions, meaning if you are hunting but under the age of

seen, you are fine if you are not hunting and you are under the age of sixteen. You have now violated both provisions and it is a crime if you are not hunting and you are over the age of fifteen sixteen or seventeen eighteen or whatever. You are not in violation of both provisions, which means you are exempt. If you are hunting and young or you are not hunting, but at least sixteen or seventeen. I think it's actually pretty easy to understand. I've had many people much amusement, Wisconsin they go hunting when they were twelve and that's it you. Or not in violation of both. Therefore, you are exempt They could have written a law better, but I think the same major win for car Rittenhouse I'll leave it there. Next

it's coming up at four p m over at Youtube COM slashed him cast thanks, rang out and will see you all them.