Its February twenty fifth, twenty twenty one and two days stories. First, a woman at Smith College who had complained about racial discrimination is revealed to have not been a victim of such event? This moment led to a massive uproar in the community, resulting in several people losing their jobs. The story is taking off as one who left the workplace citing racial hostility has now raised over two hundred and forty thousand dollars challenging critical race theory, and these lies in the next story. We have Marjorie Taylor, green, sparking outrage after she put up a sign in front of her office in Congress. That reads: there are only two genders and, lastly, game stop stocks, which is basically mean stocks are guy rocketing once again, and, in the meantime, the M one money supply is Quinn, toppling some tat we ve never seen before that suggests. Maybe the economy is collapsing. So before we get started had over two TIM cast out,

become a member to get access to exclusive members. Only episodes of the TIM cast iron podcast. Here amazing stories from people like Sidney, Watson, James O Keefe and even the guy from Phoenix Ammunition. The company that band light and voters from buying ammo and explain why. Now, let's get to the news It started back in twenty eighteen, a young black woman, a student at Psmith College was peacefully minding around business and eating lunch when a police officer approached her and asked her some questions, the student filmed the encounter and framed it as though it was Rachel profiling and that it was a horrifying experience to have this officer come up to her to have someone call the police on her for simply minding her own business. She said that she was approached simply for the crime of being black, but an independent investor investigation found that it was not true. Apparently, the officer was called for a different matter and politely just enquired as two of his person. What we need

what was going on or something had happened now, really it but following this: the university went nuts started, making life a living, hell as this student complained about the racial profiling? Apparently several but we're ousted from their jobs, and things just got really bad at university for a lot of people. It got particularly contentious. The whole thing was just not true, I would say it was a hoax, but take a look at this glory. Is this glorious sentence from the New York Times. The story highlights the tensions between students, deeply felt a sense of personal truth and facts that are at odds with it. Personal truth, you mean you were wrong and over reacted and ruined people's lives and their experiences university. The facts showed that you were incurred, and that's just your personal truth. My friends, you ve, heard many stories like this. This is not the only one there are tongue

and we are seeing the explosive expansion of left wing racial, Identitarian ISM, which allows for this type of exploitation. We've. We ve already seen many people launch go fund me fund writers and make hundreds of thousands of dollars alleging some kind of victimization at the hands of the authorities. We are entering an era of woke capital and I'm sorry, my friends meritocracy has out the window. It ain't ain't, even command economy, now its victim, those those who are considered to be the most victimized get the power. Let's be real. For a long time to this country has been deemed to be a plutocracy ruled by wealthy elites and oligarchy. It was Citibank that said something like this about ten years ago. I believe it was evening. I could be wrong while we know that money.

His power and at those who have more money, have more influence over the political space. So, as people seek to use victimhood as a weapon to gain political power, there are going to be very strange people controlling the reins of our government there. These are the people who go on twitter and claim that TED crews almost got them murdered. I mean that was a yo see they use this to raise money for political adds. This is the dawning of a victim economy Sorry just one example within a couple of things, and I want to bring up into this story that the nature of critical race theory, as well as new p essays from cartoon network, that many people are talking about push

king on this idea, which expands leftist identity areas on which would have a government based around race and identity, something that we all fought so hard to end with the nineteen sixty four civil Rights ACT, and then it's only gonna get worse. But let's get started and read through the story to get the nitty gritty details on what happened with this hoax. Before we get started had over two TIM cast iron site, him cast dot com and become a member to get access to exclusive members, only episodes we have a ton of really great podcast. You can't get anywhere else that aren't they go on Youtube and we set up TIM cast out comes specifically so that, in the event I inevitable inevitably get banned or suppressed. I believe that some of my recent content about tax censorship literally got censored, and that tends to be the case. I will still have this website. One other thing that we're working on his with your membership the resources on getting our going towards supporting this content, but also we are focusing on bill an open source software to decentralize than that, so that centre

It won't be an issue in the future. That is a big goal that have, and I need your support to do it, but seriously just helps support my channel. My content. It allows it to grow. Don't forget to like share subscribe hit that Notification Bell. That's right, the stor from the new times inside a battle over race class and power at Psmith College student. She was racially profiled while eating in a college college. Dorm investigation investigation found no evidence of bias, but the incident will not fade away. Why me just put it simply before we read this, welcome to the Bible era doesn't matter who's right or where the facts are it matters which side can be empowered by this Are we to say too many of those on the left? But you need a wake up call to what the Democrats, the establishment in the corporate politicians, including Republicans, are doing. There was recently apes, a survey Don echelon insights, republicans biggest concerns.

The exact same concerns they ve always had illegal immigration, taxes, support for police, etc. The Democrats are concerned about Trump supporters and white nationalism, things that art really policy issues. You dont, like what tromp supporters are doing. The Democrats are being roped up by media outrage, but they are being exploited by Griffith authors, who will stage hoaxes to manipulate you and exploit your goodwill, historic Wretch, my heart, this young black woman. She did, she was not profiled. At least investigation said so, but she's exploiting the goodwill we all have, and we ve seen it over and over again, notably with George Floyd and other large protest movements. We all want to protect life to varying degrees. I have two unfortunately say but we want to respect other people, people their their civil rights. Everybody does, including Republicans, tells you otherwise has not had a real conversation with conservatives. I shouldn't say Republicans, because our mulligan parties trash to be completely honest, real breaks, my heart,

because I see these left us these liberals who really want to fight racism, but they keep getting manipulated, I want. Only for you to see, what's going on, to see that their grifters, who are stealing from you, here's the story. They say in mid summer of two thousand and eighteen um Canute a black student, Psmith College Recount recounted a distressing American. Tell This eating lunch in a dorm lounge when a janitor and campus police officer walked over and asked her what she was doing. The officer who could have been carrying a lethal weapon left her near melt down Miss good Iranian Facebook so that this encounter continued a year. Long pattern of harassment at Psmith quote. All I did was be black. Miss Canoe day wrote its outrageous that some people question my being at Psmith College and my existence overall is able, as a woman of color, the college's President Kathleen Macartney

offered profuse apologies and put the janitor unpaid leave. This painful incident reminds us of the ongoing legacy of racism and bias the president rope in which people of color our tar It will simply going about the business of their ordinary lives. The New York Times, I opposed and seen and picked up the story of a young female student harassed by white workers, the ace the hell. You, the American Civil Liberties Union, which took the students Kay said she was profiled for quote eating, while black less attention was paid for months later, when a law firm hired by Psmith College, to investigate the episode found, no persuasive evidence of Bias Musketeer Day was determined to have was determined to have eaten and deserted. Dorm that had been closed. For the summer, the janitor had been encouraged to notify security. If he saw unauthorized people there. The officer like all campus police was unarmed Smith. College officials emphasized

deletion and healing after the incident in the months that in the months to come, they announced a raft of anti biased training for all staff, a revamped and more sensitive campus police force and the creation of dormitories, as defended by Miss Canoe, to enter a sale. You lawyer set aside for black students and other students of color, let me stress, said, grow gated door, rooms emerged from this. Let me ask all of you and please, if you are, someone looked at the irregular view of its content, share this with those in your family. Your friend I disagree with you and have a real conversation. I want to ask you something very simple: would you agree with segregated dorm rooms? Would you agree with discriminating against people base on their race, just Gimme, a simple yes or no answer to those questions. Now many of you

may have already read the literature and agree with those things and say you there should you you may agreed with with the segregation and with discrimination, but a lot of good natured and good good faith and goodwill. The liberals would say no. It flies in the face of Doktor Martin Luther King Jr Dream, so the civil rights protests were fighting to end segregation to get these civil rights ACT put in place to guarantee the end of segregation and on the good guys one. We ended that segregation. We have fought so hard to make sure that there are shared spaces in that people have access to everything it has been a liberal position that businesses should not discriminate on the basis of the of certain characteristics, immutable ones. Yet now we're being told that they should have aggregated dorm rooms. I'm sorry, I I'm sorry. I will always oppose that now. For obvious reasons, I come from a mixed race background lot people's atom mentions at all the time I was a periodical

the hours and hours of content, maybe a couple times in the past. You know six months or so, but it matters to my family matters me, I don't want to live in a world where my friends are segregated. For my other friends, that's nightmarish and weird, and now that's what we're getting now with this critical race theory we're getting it now with these hoaxes. I dont know why these people want segregated dorms. They claim it's because they need safe space In other circumstances, they claim there should not be segregated spaces and makes no sense, in my opinion, other than to gain power. The near times goes on to say they did not offer any public apology or a menace to the workers who lives were gravely disrupted by the students of accusation. This is a tale of how race class in power collided at the elite. One hundred forty five year old, liberal arts com where tuition, room and board top seventy eight thousand dollars a year and where the employers who keep the school running often come from working class enclaves beyond the schools. Elegant wrought iron gates.

Laurie, highlights the tensions between students, deeply felt sense of personal truth and facts that are at odds with it. I could never of afforded this when I was growing up seventy eight thousand dollars a year was well beyond what my family could afford. Yet I'm repeatedly told that my dad side of the family are privileged over these individuals and that this woman was a victim having gone into an unauthorized portion of the school and was able to pay a seventy eight thousand dollars a year skull tuition? Sorry to issue, and that is the opinion of privilege. I'm sorry, but I'll give him my thoughts. It makes no sense to me to claim that a homeless white men as privileged and that Oprah Winfrey is not, as you she's one of the richest people on the planet and that's an understatement. Linear time says the tensions come at a time when few in the Smith community feel comfortable publicly questioning liberal orthodoxy on race and identity, and some professors worried administration is too

inferential to its increasingly emboldened students, my perception is that you're on the wrong side of issues of identity, politics you're not just mistaken. Your evil said James Miller, an economics professor at Smith, college and a conservative view? Miss Macartney said that Miss Canoe tastes encounter with cap. A staff was part of a spate of cases of living, while black harassment across the nation there was, she noted great pressure to act. We always try to show compassion for everyone involved. She said President MC Let me like all workers misquoted interacted with on that day is white faculty members, however, pointed to a pattern. They say reflects the college's growing timidity in the face of allegations. Students, especially around the issues of race and ethnicity. Two thousand and sixteen students denounced faculty at Smith's Social work program as racist after some professors questioned whether admission standards for the program had been lowered, and this is affecting the quality of the field work Dennis meals when the professors they decried left the school

not long after then, in the atom. Two thousand and nineteen, the religious studies Department promised a class on native american religion and spirituality. A full complement of students registered, but well before classes began, a small contingent of native american students and allies pasted bright red posters on buildings on campus campus, revealing the course and harmful, intrusive and disrespectful attacking the. As harmful intrusive and disrespectful and attacking the instructor, who was young white as not on a tenure track. He had an academic background in this field and had modeled his course on that of his mentor. Who was a well known professor and member of the Choctaw Nation, the administration decline to challenge the students protests and had the instructor submit two sessions of radical listening with the protesters. In the end, the religious studies Department dropped the class, the atmospheric Smith is gaining attention nationally in part, because a recent resign employee of the school Jody Shock has attracted a fervent youtube following by

crying what she sees as the college's insistence that its white employees through anti biased training, accept the theory of structural racism. Stop it's called critical race theory, not structural racism. We can talk about institutional racism, which is when an institution has a bias. So universities, for instance, are examples of institutional racism when they determine when that certain individuals should be granted preferential access, that is institutional racism, the instruction of course having the power. To determine which races are allowed in and out of now. Of course, many on the left say that's not the case, but we've seen racial discrimination from these institutions, so call it whatever you want there is also historical racism, which is a reference to I mean look, there was aggregation, there was slavery. This result but in systemic racism, meaning that through these systems, we as individuals may be better off

in terms of our morality in understanding, we may reject racist attitudes and behaviour towards other people, but there are, still remnants of these policies and laws that exist today case in point red lining and block busting which were discriminatory policies that made it very difficult for black people and for minorities to find a home, certain cities and jurisdictions, the remnants of it resulted in ghettos and enclaves and poverty which persist to this day, so while individuals may firmly oppose racism, there are still remnants of additives that that exist, and I think we can have conversations around this, but ultimately it seems that the fairest solution to this that we come up with would be a class based solution, not a race based one, because we don't want to recreate the segregation of the past and the policies that resulted in these problems. In the first place.

What you see what they do over the New York Times in your times, have been heavily accused of being overly woke or engaging in left as an anti terrorism. There are trying to conflate these ideas. My friends, I may make a very simple for you over on Instagram I posted this is an image from a cartoon network piazza for children. It says, see color B anti racist. Most people see the phrase anti racist. And they assume it means, don't be racist. I'm sorry, that's not true. I have a quote for you from a prominent auntie racist, explaining what Auntie racism is in. This quote from Ibrahim X Kendi. He says the defining question is whether the discrimination is creating equity or inequity. It discrimination is creating equity. Then it is, and he writes,

If discrimination is creating inequity, then it is racist. The only remedy to racist discrimination is anti racist discrimination. The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination. The only remedy to present discrimination is future discrimination. This is a quote from a prominent antiracist offer, saying that you must discriminate against people based on their race in order to create favorable outcomes. Most people on the left would not agree with that. They would argue that discrimination is wrong. I mean coming from my family, who fought so hard against discrimination. They all certainly would think that discrimination is wrong and they taught me to believe as such, and I carry that with me. So what does it mean now, when you have a cartoon for children, telling people to see color and be anti

just at its core. This does have a very large overlap with say the alt right now, obviously, that identical II, the others very there's very big differences, but the general idea is that these critical race theorists want too trigger what is known as a racial awakening. They want people to recognize the color of everyone else, so they can vote on policies based on that color Let me ask you something very simple: some very simple: what race is the majority of this country? Obviously people who will most likely be impacted by Psas sin saying to see color to judge people based on their race, white people and People are told to make decisions based on the color of their skin and the color of other people's skin, which do you think this group is going to which race will predominantly benefit from voting based on race. Once again, it is

white people is whether many right wing, editorials and white, at an Italians that support and agree with a lot of this ideology. And it's why true, you know, activists, individuals who really care about social justice and equality and legitimate equity would say. This is wrong and extremely dangerous. Now, maybe there's a bunch of people who don't understand what it means when you have schools and you have these these policies and critical race theory genuinely genuinely think they're doing the right thing, hopefully that I don't gave you breaks down why what you're doing is wrong. I can't tell you how many times I've had arguments with wealthy Progressives who tell me how I'm supposed to live my life when my family literally experienced segregation? And an anti imagination laws, I mean these things, this word not good for my family, so they fought to get it shut down

and now, once again it is the White progressive. I suppose that is saying we should go back to those ways. I'm sorry, I'm not afraid. I'm not, of that. I absolutely reject that, but that's what's happening and its sister people's lives. And so long as there are cowards who refuse to stand up and say no it'll only get worse. They say the path to Hell is paved with good intentions, and I think that's where we're headed its reactionary, reactionaries, a phrase. A typically means is, it was a reference to the french revolution. Those who opposed the revolution were reactionary, reacting to those who wanted to change Well, I would dare say it is the history of this nation to be the United States for the longest time, had many racial covenants racial ideology and policies. We had slavery, we had segregation where Jim Crow, we had race based law. It is only in the short term that we changed these things that will

with the Civil Rights ACT and with loving Virginia with the banning of red lining and Blue busting only in the eighties did, we start to say it's time to change the structure of this nation, and we did. It was a revolution Still to this day, many countries around the world have race based policies. Try becoming a citizen of Japan, see what happens as someone who isn't japanese and it's true for many other countries as well. The United States is unique in this regard, and so are many european nations The critical race theorists and these far leftists, who are creating segregated dorms, are trying to revert the United States back to what it used to be. That's reactionary. They oppose the radical change of equality and recognizing people as people and not based on their race, but once again they will say you see color in this p s, I there is a little black or a little white girl, and the little black girl says that her experience of anti black racism is different from the experiences of other races and the little

a girl says that it matters that she's white to now many of them. I will tell you what the white girl is saying. Is that she's talking about white privilege? That's fine! Ok! I understand the concept, but let me just once again state what I feel has always been obvious. What is majority race in this country white. Who would who? Who is most likely going to vote on racial lines if they start having a racial awakening? Seen color white people because there's more of them, it's just general arrangement, and do you think they'll vote in favour of their own race or against their own rice? I'm sorry. While there may be many liberals within our group preference the good preference is only around light, but believe ten or so percent. If you were actually able to, as as you know, make white people see color they're going to start voting for their own interests, which is why

the alt right supports much of the same ideology as black lives matter, not identically, of course, and critical race theorists. It's. Why both the left, this woman is Identitarian, as well as the alt right they're, quite literally identitarians back at the New York Times, they say quote: stop demanding that I admit to white privilege and work on my so called implicit bias as a condition of my continued employment, Miss Jaw who is also a ninety. Ninety three graduate of Smith who worked in the residential Life Department, said in one of her videos after months of clashing with administration, Miss shall resigned last week and appears likely to to the school, calling it a racially hostile workplace. Her claims drew headlines from Fox NEWS to rolling stone this week. Alumni faculty and students continue to debate the issue. All of this arose from the events of July thirty, first, twenty eighteen.

This individual Jody, I believe it said Jody Psmith, Jody Shaw, sorry, Psmith College Jody Shop has launched a go, find me help Jody Shaw with legal and living expenses. She has now raised two hundred and forty thousand dollars. This is a culture. War people are fighting for resources and you can see one individual gave five thousand dollars to this woman. Interestingly, at some point go fund me froze the donations to investigate the claims and statements may by Jodi Shaw, as we've seen over and over again go fund. Me has no problem banning anyone who goes against their leftist orthodoxy, for, however, and Jodi Shaw's case Gofundme, has released the hold on my account over at Gofundme Shaw, says since going public with my own story of being trapped in a hostile work environment. I have heard from people both my own former colleagues and others who are in similar situations

but cannot afford to take action with any money I raise and access of a hundred fifty thousand dollars. I would like to help others exercise their right to free from a hostile work environment. The purpose of this cause is too is money for the legal and living mortgage. Rent food transportation, childcare expenses of myself and others who were forced to leave their jobs due to a hostile work, environment and or would like to take legal action, cannot do so due to a lack of financial resources, who have come come to me for support cannot afford to have their identities exposed while still employed. It is precisely this climate of fear that I am seeking to combat with my lawsuit, but revealing the identities of other individuals trapped and has to work environments would compromise their safety and security. Well, listen. Some people would say it's easy for me to speak up, because I run my own business, and that is not true. I mean it certainly true that it's easier for me to speak

fine, but I spoke up when I worked for ABC News Joint venture with Univision. They were a completely woke environment. I was explicitly told that I could not participate in a high profile event because I was too white, even though I actually have a mixed race background. They don't respect Asians and they don't respect a white background and I was told by this company again I could not participate. Sorry and I was actually told by one of the executives it's but racist, I know now. What could I do? File a lawsuit? That's not necessarily why I'm! Maybe I should have. No. I just spoke up, spoke out left and I've told people about this. I tried breaking my car. Fact, which they wouldn't let me do, and I said well, you know what it's called golden handcuffs thirty baton of money and they make it. So you can't really do much. They allowed me to basic the work on my own youtube, gentle, and so I said there still paying me they're discriminating

it's me based on my on my race and my appearance. I mean it had nothing to do with the fact that, with with the fact of being white because by by legal accounts. I qualify as other on these documents because I am not solely one race but was appearance. That's exactly what exactly what Dr Martin Luther I said want to happen, but here it is in full swing. I'm worried about the future because you know seeing cartoon network come out and say to children, see color I simply ask people: do you agree with the dream of doktor king that one day his children will be judged on the content of their character and not the color of their skin now live in a world where the left is advocating for judging people based on the color of their skin. Now I've already many people are left about this and they ve said it's. It's not at odds. You can recognise some

raising their experiences, but not judge them. Because if I say no, you literally can't when you claim that there's white privilege and that its inherent and and supersedes all other issues, you would look. Let's say you have. You took a white man and a black man and you dressed them in fine clothing. You would judge them on what you think: they're statuses, by their appearance, the cholera the skin. We can't do that. I got to be honest. You can learn more about someone based on their shoes than their skin color and that's a fact. There's a teach us this in fundraising sales look at someone's shoes or pay a lot more than anything to do with any other characteristic people with nice shoes, you can probably assume they can afford to get nice shoes. Class issues are paramount. Well, here we go all Hey I've been talking to people about these. These issues, cartoon network, for instance, these p S eyes and, let's be real institution, are wholly embracing. Neo Ray

it ideology when they say its anti racist there's a reason why they're calling it anti racism and not saying don't be racist, because to tell someone not to be racist, we typically associate that with Not discriminating against somebody based on their race, but, as I showed you, some of the most prominent authors, one of the most prominent author, Ebr Mackendy, who who actually some some of the best selling books, has straight up said that the only remedy is discrimination like you to ask your friends and Emily, who don't know about the stuff very, very simply sat on it. You know start anything, we're not hear it have a crazy argument. You some curious. Do you support discriminating against people based on race and when invariably say no, as most will just show them this book from Ibra MAX Candy, and this quote where he says you must. He says, quote racial. I don't even want to read this Abram X, candy says racial discrimination is not inherently racist. It is.

Racism being traditionally defined as positive or net discrimination based on race, I remember for a long time they to say there was positive racism and what they meant was when you claim that agents are good at math. That was a it was racism because it's not true to stereotype, but it was a positive one. You are saying good things about them, but it was still wrong to do because you shouldn't judge people based on race. I agree. I know many agents were not good at math. I knew I knew a kid growing up who is asian and he was not particularly a smart guy. And I knew some agents were geniuses- guess what the Asian had nothing to do with it. It has to do with your access to education, your access to medical treatment, your access to information, whether or not Europe you have two parents as other big big factor in this, yet they keep trying to change conversation and make the end all be all rice. So I'll tell you what I think you have this woman

who who writes this book Robin the Angelo, telling people that she is a racist and she knows it. And that you should listen to what she has to say. Many organizations higher this woman and I dont know why. Why would you take a white woman who claims to be racist and wealthy and tell her to preach to people Or ideology that makes no sense have already laid out who's going to benefit the most from these policies. In my opinion, it's gonna be white people because once they start owning based on race? They're gonna start voting for their own race. I don't know what what what these leftist think is going to happen. It's it's not the what's, gonna happen, so I can have in the way they think it is. It is white progressives who are pushing these policies, Maybe they're misguided or maybe they're being manipulated by overt white supremacists, who are using this a Trojan horse to enact policies that fly in the. Face of the civil rights era, movement and laws, and it's gonna keep happening there

change? Language learning is arguments and there and stop anyone from talking about it. So let me just make one point clear, as we sign off on the story, when you have The white woman tell you she's a racist. Please don't listen to her. Why would you take your device from racists: that's what they're doing they're telling you they are racist and they want you to be like them when they anti racism. They dont mean non racist They mean the same thing just for the different word, so unfortunate alot of people dont want to believe it there. Claim that I have some kind of agenda. So let me look one thing additionally clear I admit I had earlier someone tried claiming that I actually supported these ideas, because simply talking about my heritage with support of some kind of race based policy, the Manila our make it make sure you understand this. Why do do people say heart impose mixed race? Maybe it's because

If any identity, Marian faction gains the ability to Billy to pass laws based on race, I will lose everything I refuse to be a second citizen, I refused to have them, say based on honey, you're, going to face some detrimental policy, because that just means my family goes back to being second class citizens. I won't accept that I will resist it whether it comes to the left or the right. Unfortunately, it looks like the left is, this fight, that's a reality. Smith college colleges still having these conversations. People's lives are still adversely affected. I can say it's a good thing. Jody Shaw has raised nearly two hundred and forty thousand dollars for a reason he's going one someone who's fighting against this with, where with respect and and hopefully in the end, True shows justice activists, the true ones who want real equality among people. Hopefully they win, but it only happens.

But if you speak up- and you share videos like this- to help educate people to what's really going on, segment is coming up tonight at eight p m. At Youtube com TIM Cast, IRL, it's a live show thanks for hanging out, and I will see you all then. Marjorie Taylor, Green back in the news again, because she put up a sign that says there are two genders. Male and female quote trust the science. The leftists are freaking out. Their outrage The mainstream media, of course supports their narrative and not the conservative narrative, because that's just the way it always goes, and I gotta be honest. It's really hard to care about the stupidity of all of this stuff. That's going on, look the left is poor sharing a ridiculous narrative on this. All here comes the angry leftist drifters, claiming that I'm wrong shore. Whenever I saw phony tweet it had sexism is when someone says women must do the dishes, equality.

Is when men and women together say you know what anyone can do. The dishes and gender theology says whoever is doing the dish This is a woman. You take a look at these stories and how they're trying to define gender, and you can see that it's what's quite arbitrary. So in that, guard, I would say, Marjorie Taylor, green sign is wrong. Gender is not according to the left. A reference to biological sex is a reference to social constructs for which there are an infinite number. No joke. New York has long supply. Where did the idea that there are infinite numbers of abstract genders? How can you have legislation protecting gender if there is no definable gender, this whatever they comes down to so from this. We have acts, acts and x y trending concern. Say there are two genders genders are social constructs but they're built upon the biological sexes.

And the left just basically says anyone can make up what every gent, whatever gender they want, and now there's a feud over it. This all has to do with the equality ACT in an all start. When Congresswoman Marine Newman put up a transgender rights flag in front of her office, which is across from Marjorie. A green modular green and comes out with a sign that says there are two genders and we live one of the stoop stupidest times in american history. Sure I guess I wonder if people are gonna like romanticize this era the same way they do like the twenties and You know, and the eighteen ninety ease or whatever you know I mean I mean like they make. These, where it shows people going. Those other really can make movies about stuff, like this You know what man I got to be honest. It's really hard to care about all of this stuff, but the sad reality is every single day. We see more insane idea

Gee based nonsense, Zella wont. Let me bring us down for you. I got explain to you what the equality ACT is before we go to what's going on with the signs are, you can understand? What's happening, Marjorie, Taylor, Green, but against this equality act with protections for algae beating? You, Americans is up for a vote in the house. What is it music today says? The house on Thursday is set to pass sweeping legislation prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex sexual orient, station on gender identity, though it faces an uncertain future in the Senate, the equality at amend existing federal civil rights law to extend protections for Lgbtq Americans in what democratic lawmaker. And advocate site would make significant progress towards legal protections for all Americans. It is one of President Joe Biden top legislative priorities. Ok, let me die some. I like the nineteen sixty four civil rights ACT. I like the idea that we tell people you can't discriminate on the basis of certain characteristics, immutable characteristics. Gender identity is the opposite of that

sex and orientation long considered to be, immutable? That's kind of changing, I suppose, particularly around two different schools of thought on transgenderism, and this is where things start to break down, because when you have laws like this and no unified language, what do the laws really mean? The bigger problem that I think we're seeing in all of this not anything to do with well, let me saw down there. One of the biggest problems we have is. There is not one english language anymore. I mean there's always been british English. when the lift- and I you know astray- yeah we're like they do say to see word to their friends but we are now seeing gender mean and allow a handful of different things were hearing what we, if we set transgender actually means a handful of different things. How do you legislate If no one agrees on what the definition is now there may be many left us

arguing and Sanctum pools of big. It is an oyster, I'm. Sorry, I'm not trying to be a big it or or disrespect anybody. I will point out some basic facts: first, There is a millennium, an older view of transgender ISM in this war world. I'm specifically reference a very famous trends woman who explained this? How do you transition from say, mail to female if there's a fair, if there's not just to genders- and In that case, why would you need to have a surgery or or medication, not my opinion, I'm I'm I'm trying to avoid revenues person's name because they are too got harassed. Four things but there are many trends, women and transgender individuals who have pointed out. They view that there's only two vendors and they are based on biological sex and they want to transition via hormone or surgery to the other gender. But now you have the GEN Z transgenderism,

This is where you start to get the non binary plethora of genders, including one I'm not trying to be disrespectful arm, I'm not making it up. Hydro, gender. Hydro. Gender is described by Jens ears. As a gender up, referencing water, you feel fluid or like water Then there is like that. Does there's a whole bunch of other genders. You know like pen, gender and like Demi, gender and suchlike think that these things, but it really seems like is that the younger generation kind of just rebelling, I suppose, is literally just describing personality traits and how they feel and calling them. Now, there's a logical basis to this. I'm not saying it is completely sound in the long run, but the general ideas When you tell someone gender as a reference to do these social constructs around biological sacks, they then say yeah but some women, where long, fifty dresses

someone women where pants? Therefore, you know anybody could make up any kind of social construct. It has not no bearing on an unbiased logical sex, in which case you end up with young people, basically saying: okay, let's just start making up genders the flies in the face of the older transgender ideology. Crap. This resulted in a high profile, transforming being harassed and then of Julie, leaving social media and they think they came back and things like that, but you can see even on the left. There's no more unified understanding of this sort is what happens at Marjorie Taylor during the story from NBC News: Rep Marge Retailer Green, hang sign, mocking congressional neighbours, transgender pride flag in twitter, spat. Green hung a sign facing Rep Mary Newman's office. It says there are two genders male and female trust the science these joint take with this is that Marino and actually mocked Marjorie Taylor, Green first, putting out a video saying Marjorie too,

A green opposes what we believe in order to put this flag right in front of her office by all means put up a flag. I dont care, but they did it not as a. I want this flag here as a sign of our support. They did it directly as a target. You know there are targeting Marjorie Taylor, Green. Marjorie Taylor Green responded, the news comes out going after Marjorie Taylor Green, because look. This is just the way things go right. Let me break down for you now the issue that I know that that is that's the gist of the viral story, seriously nights you get that you get the picture. Let me explain some stuff. Do you? I first and foremost have no strong opinions on well. I have some strong opinions for sure, but if they pass this law, so be it if they pass the equality act, okay, I'm not complaining, not not, or

against. For the most part. I know that the latter's plugin screaming I should before it, but there's issues that need to be that they need to be worked out, and the most important thing to do to mention in this is that the bill contradicts itself and would result in chaos. Well, when I say chaos, I dont mean like dogs and cats living together in planes falling out of the sky. I just mean there will be a period disputed legislation over what these words actually mean and how you adjudicate them and you will probably get different rulings, indifferent, different federal districts because this different ideology exist in different locations in the country. Let me explain the bill says that you can discover that on the basis of sex or gender identity. Ok, now, let's jump over to this story. High school track athlete disappointed after Biden D, O J drops supply

of challenge to transgender policy. You may remember this story. This is from just this morning. Let me read a little bit for you and then we'll loop, this all together, Connecticut High School track athlete Alana Smith, told Fox NEWS Wednesday. She was disappointed after the Biden, Justice Department withdrew its support for her lawsuit, seeking to prevent transgender athletes from competing in girls sports. The Justice Department had backed Smith's case last year during the Trump Administration Smith, who is fighting the rule after placing below a transgender runner in a meat told foxes, prime time that she and other female athletes quote, have worked really hard to get our stories out there to get people to realise that fairness needs to be restored in our support and in all other women sports Psmith hopes. People will realise that a lot of biological females have missed out on making it too meets. That really matter and the transgender athletes have take,

in spots on the podium that belong to biological females, quote we train for so many days a week, so many hours to be able to be the best in our state and the best in our region, and these biological males are just taking it away from us and we really deserve it. Smith's attorney, Kristen, Christiana, Holcomb of the alliance defend, freedom vowed. The case will go ahead and call the Doj's decision politically motivated. What is more concerning is this effort took got legal protection for women that took got legal action for women not just isolated to what we see in Connecticut. Even now, the Bite administration is pushing for the so called Equality ACT which ignores the physical differences between men and women and threatens women's privacy? We almost shelters, and yes even women's sport, national level for female athletes like a lotta title, I was designed to ensure that girls, like a lotta a fair and level playing field. Holcomb concluded, we want to move forward and we won. To see women sports protected across the country

I often mention in segments about these issues. Let me make it very simple: for you in major leads, sports football basketball baseball. There is no rule, barring females women from competing in these on these teams and being involved, The issue is when it comes to the owners. They don't recruit females, typically because on the higher end of the bell curve of the best of the best athletes who can play the sport, it's men, I mean basketball is fairly obvious. All of the guys who play basketball for the most part super tall, save Mugsy bows. Who is pretty awesome? they're, mostly tall people, and there are a lot of people who are younger, maybe they're, twelve years old and they're playing baseball and they're really really good And then, once they reach a certain age, they realize how they stopped growing their only five hundred and ninety five. Ten hey, that's not a bad height to be a fairly average. But that's what you want to play: basketball in the NBA

gotta be tall. Now there are some people got mentioned, Bugsy, who is really really really good? I think it was like five three dude was is a legend amazing stuff showing that some people can really break that barrier, but there are some people who just can't compete in major exports and has nothing to do with being a man or woman in the NBA just not tall enough right in female sports, you actually can't we had and the reason for this is pre natal testosterone, there's more fast, muscles allowing for more burst strength, jumping higher faster burning on energy, faster our shoulders larger hands, better grip, stronger joints, double the college in and skin there's a lot of differences between biological males and biological females. Now one of the big things we ve seen when it comes to the debate over transgender individuals in sports has to do with hormone therapy. And so you ve seen many studies and many arguments and there are conflicting sets of research, but

it will say so long as a transgender woman is taking hormone therapy for a certain amount of time. They should. They should be able to compete because they lose his advantages by, I can just say there are many studies that say that is absolutely not sure because- prenatal. Testosterone plays a large role in this anecdotally I'll. Just tell you this, I skateboard even skateboarding for man what we going now? Twenty one or twenty two years I have I have when I was a teenager. I was friends with some of the top female prose in the industry. A good friend of mine that I grew up with was for a wild like one. The best of the best female skateboard. Now, interestingly, she was able to actually com, on the level with all the guys in Chicago, because skateboarding is an art form and if you, if you're willing to

Roy yourself off a building or jump down a massive set upstairs then you ve got the psychological advantage that many other individuals wouldn't have those really interesting to me, and it made me a big proponent of you. No equality in in women skateboarding. But I can tell you this right. Now there there is a dramatic, dramatic gap between the overall skill level, jumping height between biology go female skateboards and biologically male state borders and their even arson. Prominent try, Gender state borders, who are our Trans women, who just are an entirely different skill level. I gotta say I'm: I'm I'm really impressed by their skateboarding, but I've. I've since that several videos from some transgender trans woman, tapers people born biologically male of transition and the skill all of the things they're doing are. I got to be honest, even rivaling, that of some of the best men, no joke,

scoreboard is an interesting thing and I highlight skateboard because not the same as football words like throw the ball far crash into somebody, there's an art form to it. It's it's. You know some people call like a Marshall art. You can have bravery psychological ability, no psychological strength. We are willing to jump down dangerous things, take a bigger risks and have technical ability where you can do, Oh, you know variety of tricks in combination, some other stuff, I've seen from a biological male transients gaiters is just I gotta, be honest. I think, of these individuals competed in women skateboarding. They would win. Go outright I'm not saying that means every single trans person always would always win, or anything like that. I'm just saying the differences are real, so let's bring it back to this equality act and why the bill itself is contradictory. Now, first and foremost, I understand, and if somebody is transgender and walks into a bakery, this bill would protect them that make sense if they

are in a same sex relationship and they walk into a bakery and said O. I would like to be serviced. This would protect them. And if they are a man or a woman, you couldn't have a feminist or a masculine bakeries. I won't serve men or women or whatever. It does, however, create some very, very interesting problems, adding sex to anti discrimination law. I'm nuts, I'm gonna, get nothing for guess it just consider this. What we are hearing from the lawyers in the school track. Anything you have women's shelters. These are typically designed for biological females, who tend to be smaller in stature, have less muscle, mass and look, let's be real. First, I then men can be abused. Biological males can be abused by their spouses in happens, but typically it goes in one direction: spousal abuses, more devastating for four women for females particular because guys, bigger fists, more muscle, mass tend to be taller and larger. So when

engage in domestic abuse, its pretty devastating. I actually think there's I may have seen that this comparable amounts of domestic vision in the other direction, but quickly, our society kind of ignores this, because a dude being smacked enough ace or slapped by woman doesn't result in the same of damage as either way around. I do think this problematic the laws alone. We should not have discrimination, one where the other here's the point. We separate shelters to protect females and women who are concerned about being in it. To the male, maybe due to some trauma. If a woman was you know sexually abused by men, they prob, not not want to be around who's biologically. Biologically this this bill would take away that protection. I know the left doesn't care they're, absolutely absolutely. In of of but there are many people who are in favour of women's rights. Now I think we should clarify for the sake of this discussion.

And because the left and right don't agree what they mean as biological female writes that biological females are very different to biological males and thus require a different set of protections than biological males would adding this language of sex to the nineteen city force of Rights ACT would mean that you couldn't really have women's locker rooms or showers. I know a lot of people say that I personally, but its legitimately true, you cannot tell someone, you can't do this on the basis of sex. Now there are. There is an interesting argument in that courts have ruled so long as there is an equal and opposite version, or the other, you know biological sex, then it's not discriminatory. So in this regard they say if there's a men's, locker room and men's locker room, you can bar a women from the men's

Ray man from the woman's because they have their own segregated spaces. But then we come down to Orient nation. Now you can't be called on are not origin identity, because identity is inherently internal, you could just say, identify as I see fit and they cannot discriminate. This will remove the protections under these court rulings, so ultimately that means we have set up barriers for female sports so that you know people biological males, don't compete against women, the biological females. The left wants to eliminate those barriers and you will start seeing exploitation. I'm not saying that every trans person, splendid under saying in a bad people exist, and sometimes we will exploit exploit things. But you will you very serious ramifications to this. In the end, it will be biological females who lose out substantially, but the bill itself is contradictory. Like I said, because gender identity and sex you have those two things

the other and then all of a sudden they can't protect one or the other how do you say it's not fair to discriminate on the basis of sex, but then tell biological. Email, she's, not entitled to a space separate from biological males. The argument is that, well, you could I went to the biological male space. If you want to it takes away special protections for biological females, which society long determined was an appropriate thing. But left refers to this as gender segregation and they ultimately want to get rid of it. Look I got, I can t on the stuff to try to explain it for a million years. Battled thing that really matters really matters. Let's just get down to the brass tacks I mean but data's here. Nobody, nobody actually cares about what the sciences I gotta be honest, I mean. Maybe I should say nobody. Alot of people do Ya Margie Taylor Green, saying trust. A science. A lot of people are now saying over at the x x and X, Y is trending, and all of these,

Thus our saying it's trending, because people don't understand that. It's not. You know that, but there's more genders, there's x, x, access x, x Y, there's x, Y Y, ok, the propensity for intersects those or not either x, X, X Y is estimated to be limit. Let me just make sure I get the exact numbers, zero point, one eight percent or as high as one point: seven percent- that's according to the aggregation of on Wikipedia what they took a Peter not entitled to compensation. They shoulda mood ultimately becomes too the great do we strip away the rights of fifty one percent of the population to protect one point: seven using the higher estimate of intersects individuals, and its serious challenge. I mean I dont want to discriminate against people who are in the minority. So are we not, and biological females are the majority. So do we offer majority protection, as is the ultimate argument and I'll tell you this? The end result will,

there's going to be a lot of biological females who will be removed from many athletic programmes because they won't be competitive anymore. You can that that that that's a fact it's why this woman is following this lawsuit in Connecticut, I'm pretty sure it's because she would have placed like eighth or something which would have got her a spot at a scouting event where she could, scholarship, but to transgender women who are not transitioning, we're taking hormones. I think that one first in second place and shattered the that the women's track record several women two women were then dropped from the top rankings, because the tranquil in one the left will say that's good good for them,

and the right will say, it's not fair to these young women who competed and trained every day and just didn't, have the capability to compete against a biological male who is not currently transitioning. They may be at this point, I'm not entirely sure. So therein lies the bigger issue. Do we just get rid of the rights of women to have safe spaces? Should women be afforded safe spaces? That's a simple question: yes or no, don't look at me. You know Twitter, Albania, Youtube Bana! If you say the wrong thing on this one, but conversations that have to have to happen. So, of course, the left has called be transferred back and I mean an express an opinion, one where the other I have just pointed out the actual arguments and what we can expect to happen. Anybody who oppose Is what they're saying and doesn't just blind follow along is going to get, you know, accused of being all the things in the world, I'm so over it man, I'm I'm, I'm just it it is so hard to make me care about this. You know.

I lived in the cities. I really did care because it affected me and the people around me and then, after that I had some insanity, I said I'm just gonna get at least I don't live anymore. Now, look the people who still live in the cities and I'm like YO. If you still live here and you want to live under these rules and do these things go for it if you want to, but for the stuff go for. I'm not standing in your way. I don't care if you want to have all these rules due to it. I'm gonna go. Do my thing, maybe get a farmer whatever and just have my own little private space and I'll. Let you do you think, is I'll stay out of your hair about that. Problem, I suppose is: where does not lead to Morrow? I do think for the most part stuff like this, isn't actually that important, I think, will adjudicate these things as we get to them, and you know the rules. Cross those bridges as we get to them, but I think there's going to be a lot of angry and hurt individuals going to be a lot of conflict, and I think, like what I said about the equality,

actors that, ultimately it will lead to a particularly chaotic legislative season, not that I'm saying its unique in that regard, but that you're gonna see a lot of really interesting cases where maybe, unlike the ninth District Veil something like. Oh, you know what this down is discriminate on the basis of sex. Because of these reasons, and then in a different district, that's more red they'll say something totally different. Then I'll have to go to the Supreme Court and then the Supreme Court narrowly rule on the matter and you know not really address the broader. Are dove it which will result in more lawsuits to clarify narrow, doesn't mean like five before it means they only focus on one core aspect and then eventual you'll get a bunch of more lawsuits. The issue there is that when we, when we ass. The nineteen sixty four civil rights act. There still work in a law and things like that and you, but you you can clearly define you, know someone's race. Now with the expansion of a lot of these racial eyes. You know leftists, you know critical rice, theory, laws and ideas. You can't there's some story about a guy.

Who did the dna test found out? He was four percent black look super white, but a four percent, and now he's demanding special access to grants and funding and people are saying no to this. There's a funny story about a scholarship that was doing interviews with african american students and a blonde, are blue, eyed white kids shows up and there are like hey, YO african American only and he sent em from South Africa literally born in Africa and they're like get out of here and so the question about these words as terminologies these laws, it's gonna, get particular you'll only interesting, but ultimately my my view is that it will ultimately breakdown the end result. I should say that the final factor in all this is language. What is gender me. Marjorie. Taylor Green thinks gender means something different to what Marie Newman thinks, in which case the law will not function properly. In New York City, gender identity is defined as self expression

so you can't discriminate against me on the basis of self expression. Ok, I mean find if you wanna pass that law, but what does it mean? Can I can I shop to work dress up just up like a giant eagle and be like this? Is my identity? I know it may sound, might sound assert absurd, but some of these questions have to be answered. The argument that I've I've brought up I've talked a lot about this is, is unlimited, one, let's say You show up to work and you get to you, you you, you ve, now discovered your entity in its eagle. Gender. An eagle agenda requires you to wear a fake beak. You know it's like what you identify as and a bird costume. I am not saying this to spare a genuine and bring up a point about the law which I self expression. I talked the lawyer in New York. We said if you tried dressing up like

legal and shown up your job at Starbucks, and they told you to take the clothes off what you refused on the basis of gender identity. They would probably still kick you out and then you would go to court and the judge would laugh at you and I said by what reasonable argument does the judge have the right to laugh at someone over their self expression as per New York City LAW, and he said come on. Everybody knows it's absurd and my response was in the nineteen eighties if you are, having the same argument a man, a biological male dresses up in women's com thing and then says they have a right to present this way, the judge could have laughed them out of the courtroom under the rulings today, they could not do that right. If you give the judge the ability to laugh at someone self expression, then why couldn't they laugh at a Trans Trans, woman, self expression? There's no clearly defined point that you can't. You can't really quantify that point as to what defines a gender, a gender identity when the law

finds it very very broadly as self expression, but an and they say you can't discriminate on then on the name you choose and the clothes you where I know nothing about an eagle is a more extreme point, but that is the point: testing the boundaries of a law, my mutton point of bringing up again and that same four against is just to put it simply at what point do you mock someone's identity? Let's say of a biological? Male who, just like an eagle and the courts, has come on Eagle gender. Now I do in that case dismissed no violation of civil rights. Let's say someone just where's feathers adorned on there. You know over their uniform, yet where feathers sorry doesn't count, but let's you get someone who is transgender but dresses and very very The extreme and exact with way with like massive fake padded hips and like giant platform. Shoes with, like seven, would a judge, a judge, throw that out

disparage anybody. I'm saying like to what degree what a judge have the right to laugh at someone I honestly, It should be at people specially the laws this so anyway. You know I say it's hard to care about these arguments, but the reality is there's a lot to talk about in this stuff and it's hard to have the conversation, because you get banned for he I won't make us what is it a long segment I'll leave us leave us here and we'll talk about more stuff coming up, one p m on this channel. Thanks rang it and I will see well then games stops our skyrocketing again and tons of people are celebrating the ten these as they call it. The basically means the profits that today, the IRL podcast check it out at Youtube. Com Tim cast IRL. If you haven't already, I got a ton of super chats and I'm like look at all of this sweet sweet money coming in to these people, war commenting and the reason it was common in is because gay.

Gamestop was spiking and people are making tons of money. I do not have Gamestop stock, I'm not going to buy it unless I'm going to stay out of this one. I do have some other stock, Nokia KIA, whatever I don't have AMC either, but it's back right now, market Marie game Stop Corp a hundred and thirty dollars. It is up forty two point, eighty five percent. As of right now it was higher earlier today with a peak of one hundred and seventy dollars. At opening check this out, stop shares jump another. Eighty percent, after board, members cryptic tweet about soft, serve ice cream, spurs frenzied speculation on red it as roaring kitty reveals has doubled his stake in the meme stock, o celebrate now I'm laughing at everything right now, like the big trending

only this morning was like Marjorie Taylor, Green, putting a sign honoured on her wall or outside of our office, and I'm looking at this game. Stop story right and I'm thinking why? Why are these stocks skyrocketing? Because it baffles the mind you gonna be like games? Stop I got I would understand. People are saying like sixteen dollars per share. Made sense it Skype let me not bore all people would I know what's going on, and what do we mean game stopped and what is about what you click? The video you gonna find out. I think she economy is collapsing. I think the economy is collapsing. I think it is all fallen apart. The only thing you can do is smug left as the roller coaster comes crashing down. The only problem is this: roller coaster going down: it's not gonna loop back and go to the start of the ride. Once again, it's going to crash down the Tails are gonna break and we're all gonna go flying off screaming. Okay, look. The game stops thing started, because these hedge funds wanted to short the stock. It basically means they were betting. The stock would fail, but if the stock started doing really really well,

they were gonna lose a ton of money by several as met some of these big hedge funds lost billions of dollars. Well all of these people on Reddit, the little guy who are putting their money in game stop said. Hold the line, don't sell a lot of people sold they exited. Famously David Port of of Barston sports? He lost seven hundred thousand dollars on mean stocks should in this old. I guess we'll have to know at what number he sold, but I ve bought in it like three and four allows a share anyway. I digress long story short The core of this is this idea that game stop was worth more money and these hedge funds exploit the system to do Roy businesses and jobs to extract value from them a bunch of regular people fought back now, mostly they just say I like the stock, because there's already been an investigation, this guy roaring Kitty testified,

to Congress. I believe Congress, yes, Congress. I don't know it was the house of the Senate. I think it was Senate and basically said I like the stock. Here's. What happens this guy roaring kitty? He bought fifty thousand shares of games. stop at a really low number and that its skyrocketed he bought. I think he bought around like what's Sir seven dollars on really low number now, there's something four hundred and thirty. The dude is extremely wretch, guess what he just doubled down here is the political angle to this. A lot of people who were holding game stop believe, that these big hedge funds were still planning on shorting the stock and may have actually made their predict positions worse or more risky. Here's here's the idea. Initially, when games up was low, they were saying. Ok, let's bet against

games stop because who's gonna go to a retail shop during a pandemic ripe. All of these rudders, notably this rowing kitty guy bet on the stock, improving this cost of hedge funds tons of money because they, but it would go down. So we lose a lot, but once game stop reached like four hundred a boy, you, people, sad dude short the stock now cause it can only go down and then a dead, but a lot of people on the Wall Street bats separate were saying: it's not over hold the line because, like other you know, I've ever out, it's called a short squeeze. S was Gub. It'll go up way way more. Some people actually think game stock is going to surpass five hundred- and even a thousand or even ten thousand. I don't know much about stocks, so don't take any advice for me. I we always say that right.

But it does seem like this is nonsensical right. Let me tell you what I think is going on. I think a lot of people are getting rich and I think a lot of people lost a lot of money. I think a lot of people are happy. It's going back up. Maybe they can exit now someone's going to be left holding the bag. When someone else makes money, the money just doesn't appear out of nowhere. You're trading, so there's risk involved game of hot potato. I guess but Wall Street bets this subway at it discovered that the stock market is basically a big casino. Many have criticized them, saying: they're, engaging in just pump and dump schemes, which basically means someone comes out and says this is the stock you got to buy because they have a bunch and then once a that goes up because everyone's buying they sell it, make a ton of money, leave other people holding the bag. So that's what they're called schemes. With all of these users. I believe there's what light around ten. Almost ten million mew of subscribers to Wall Street bets on read. It

they're all now realising the economy is a big ol hunk of junk, and they can just play this game hot potato and try and get rich. They're turning our actual stock market, where people you know, have their retirement in the end and value and that their assets stored, but turning into a casino, nothing, it's funny in a lot of ways: a lot of people probably laughing. I think a lot of gen, Z and millennials are probably laughing a lot of gen. Xers and boomers are probably freaking out, but to me I'm sorry I I was going to say I think the economy is collapsing. I know I know. Let me just let me say say this guy's. When I look at the story about Games up, I think there's something wrong with the economy right bit: the hedge funds trying to short, destroy companies or the fact that everybody can just wrought rally the

talk to insane numbers, but I also think there is something wrong with the economy based on this image, because there are listening, I present to you, the Saint Louis FED, Fred M, one money stock, that's right, it's the Saint Louis fad, DOT, org and the friends has Fred and one minute I better go let let me describe to those who can't see this and you're just listening, perhaps on a podcast on nineteen sixty the total money supply was one hundred and thirty. Eight point nine billions of dollars. The M one money stock is basically the money in circulation well, as the years went on, the money stock gradually was growing. Around nineteen ninety

it was seven hundred and ninety five point for billions of dollars. Okay, so we're not quite yet at trillion huh in two thousand and eight just after the crisis, we were at one one thousand four hundred and seven billions of dollars. So we don't one point four trillion dollars from two thousand and eight until just before two thousand and twenty right into two thousand and twenty and in December it was nearly four trillion in the money supply well in the past year. I think the money supply has quintuple just about quintuple, I mean look,

sickly for those that are just listening. It's not even a hockey stick, you know they have you stick where it's like. The stock is going up or the graph is going up in its spikes. None of this is a straight upward line and then a tapers on a little bit at the top. The current am one money. Stock is eighteen thousand one hundred and five billions of doubt, and I know a lot of people are Sanctum tempting but wait they change just how its calculated in may have twenty. So the real weight on hold on the spikes started before May. Ok, getting into March April. It already started hockey, sticking and now and then in may it does jump quite a bit, but let me show you the financial times: it's the exact same chart of your lives, not the exact same sharp. This is a story from the financial times that says Joe Biden. One point: nine trillion dollar package,

is a risky experiment. It might be no bad thing if the US fiscal stimulus ended up somewhat smaller than now proposed and they have this graph where they say Covid. Nineteen has caused explosive growth of us broad money

a supply, and we can see it is a bit different cause us with this. One gets more into the nitty nitty gritty of the ups and downs, but we can see you can see the financial crisis into those an eight into twenty ten and then you can see in twenty twenty, the giant straight upward, spike okay. So this is year on year, growth of U S: division em for waits, the components of em for money supply by their role in transactions, so M one empty and threw him for that that their different. So some people are saying: timid, just a calculator, a difference between April and may, ok and I'll just stress the spike started before that it started February to March to April there were still a massive spike from April two. I think you know December it's up nearly a trillion dollars and the money supply and then it spikes dramatically by, like fifteen drilling

So look. Let me be real with y'all, I don't exactly know, I'm not an expert on the economy, and I hear many economists who say it's a good thing that they're mass printing trillions of dollars over and over again while nobody is working and the economy has shut down. Okay, well I'll, tell you this those saying people, ain't, saying it's a good thing about: what's going on with game, stop no they're freaking out, saying you're, destroying everything. Let me read, for you, it's happening with game, stop and then I'll tell you what what my plan is and what I'm going to be doing and what I think might actually happen and again, not a financial adviser, not an economy. The daily mail says shares of game. Stop our surging again in a puzzling sequel to last month's frenzy, with the rally immediately following a cryptic tweet about soft serve ice cream from a keyboard member. At Thursdays. Opening bell game. Stop stock jump another eighty percent

to a hundred and sixty four dollars. One day after the shares sort more than one hundred percent, you could double your money in a day. That's crazy, raising fears at small, investors swept up in the mania, could again lose big loose big come on copy editor guys. The rally began light on Wednesday soon after Gamestop Board member and activist investor Ryan Cohen, treated a mysterious image of Mcdonald Soft serve ice cream, accompanied by an abode you icon, of a frog therein, mania, also followed games. Stop evangelist Keith Gill Acre a roaring kitty revealing last week that he had doubled his steak the struggling video game retailer after he testified in Congress. I like the stock. I got to tell you man, this guy RON Kitty made himself like tens of millions of dollars. He doubled his position. He didn't sell when it was at four or five hundred. I think this dude

was looking at. I think it was the Volkswagen short squeeze people referenced where there was an initial spike and then a drop off, and then a massive spike. I think he's looking at in that direction and he's going to jump out when he becomes worth. Maybe one hundred million- I don't know, look I don't know anything about it, don't take advice for me, but I also want to clarify a lot of people say that to avoid liability, like everyone says, don't take advice from me, but you really should not take advice from people on Reddit and twitter. Small traders scrutinized Cohen's ice ice cream in in a frenzy of speculation. Searching for clues could could contain about games future. My friends, the M one money stock is skyrocketing. K money is being printed like crazy, Joe Biden. So We're gonna do another two billion two billion dollars, I'm sorry two trillion dollars and there's going to be another four

trillion dollar stimulus of our infrastructure package. It is just a dumping, it is raining money from the money from the money printers and a lot of people think was welcome. Your potent who said that We are, in an era very similar to the Weimar, Germany, where the hyperinflation hat and people were shovels, shovelling the deutsche marks into the gutters, because they were worth less. Nobody wanted him those too, I wonder, what's going to happen now with everything happening with all this money printing, but let me just point this out someone just became a millionaire because a dude posted a picture of an ice cream cone on Twitter. Look. Ok, I don't know if someone actually became a million, I'm making a point. Somebody holding stock maybe bought in, and then this the stocks skyrocketed from like forty bucks, two hundred sixty, so somebody with a couple hundred k they dumped

now he's got a million bucks. I'm sure somebody made a ton of money. The point is people are getting rich because some guy posted a picture of ice cream cone. Something is wrong with our economy. It's gonna be great right. The economy of the future is going to be people who are rich simply because they posted memes. It's great, that's not meritocracy. That's not even communism. That's democracy! The people who hold power are those who control the media. I think, something's wrong with the economy. Anyway, they say, Cohen, the billionaire founder of online pet supply. Retailer chewy Lastra, disclose that it taken a thirteen percent

They can game, stop and joined. The board touting plans to reinvent the company is an online platform users of the Red at Board Wall Street Bats, who have pushed to buy up game, stop shares view Cullen as the company Savior obsessively analyzed his tweet for signs of insider information. Following the ouster of CFO Jim Bell on Tuesday, one enterprising researcher discovered the following quote: on the website of volition, capital, a major chewy investor quote shoes. First official board meeting included two slides a lot of laughter and a trip to Mcdonald's for soft surf when twitter user Veso shared the theory. His it was like to buy volition capitals managing director pouring fuel on the bonfire of speculation. Wholly F wrote, one user, Ryan Cohen has the reins as ceo, and they just had their first board meeting me as he did at chewy. Other users speculated that the frog symbol represented the classic arcade game from

or is a long use symbol of tradition and change from tadpole to frog. Nobody knows what it means. What they're basically saying is, when this dude was at eating- and you know the company was doing great. They went out for ice cream cones. Now they think the post of the cream colored set symbolizing, he's taking over game, stop and he's gonna save the company and the stock is going to skyrocket, my personal Is that, based on what I've read read the stop stock was undervalued when roaring kitty bought into it? I think he was correct. I don't know know if it's just at one hundred and sixty four or four or five out. I don't know about that, but I think he was right. It was undervalued, game, stop, has a ton of locations. Whenever I go to game, stop, they are packed, I'm not kidding. Okay, there's a handful of game stops near me, and I was surprised to find when I would go in lines- and I don't know if it's begun- to start selling, nicknacks or whatever it is. You know little trinkets and pop dolls or whatever those things are called

or you know whatever, but I would always see people there browsing I like to go in and look at games and go home and download them. So I've not been particularly bullish on game stop, but outside of that whether the company succeeds, I don't know we'll see I the fact. Is we live in this really crazy world where right now, people are doing really crazy things over the crazy reasons? When I look at game stop, it may just be up It may just be another one of these crazy stories because we've seen short squeezes before, but then I read this story about Joe Biden and is one nine trillion dollar package risky experiment. This is what this guy over at the financial Times, Martin Wolf, he writes how much fiscal stimulus is too much. The debate on this question among economists to support the goals of Joe Biden's US administration have become fierce. That is no bad thing. Policy should be. In this crisis, as during the two thousand financial crisis, one has to evaluate the risks of doing too little against those of doing too much. But one thing is clear: the fact that too little

stimulus was delivered into. Doesn't nine does not mean that mean that far more than that must be right. Today, policy must be judged by ability in current circumstances, while reckon as in the uncertainties and balance of risks, is as I have no objection to the principle of fiscal spending he mentioned stood as a nine. He says it is not yet. Nevertheless, it is vital to recognise what makes a pandemic attack pandemic different from a financial crisis a war on a financial crisis covered nineteen will not necessarily crate and overhang of bad private debt likely to suppress demand indefinitely. In said, the balance of people who have earned well and spent little have actually improved and, unlike a war, the pandemic does not destroy physical capital. There is a good chance. Therefore, that economies will recover really strongly once fear of the disease has waned. If so, the dominant part of the plan fiscal policy response should aim not so much at short term relief, as at quote, building back better by promoting a sustained increase in public and private investment. Ok long story short with economic,

crises money seems to either it's like debt. People aren't spending anymore, so how you get the economy turning again with war, there's an actual destruction of physical assets in value, With the economy, we put everything on pause, so a lot is still there. We did read rather decimate the account I guess you saying that if we reopen ever dumping all of this into the system. It's gonna be weird, I guess on certain unstable, so I'm not here to rag on the game. Stop people! Look if you like the stocky by the stock ripe I'm just here to say whether there's a correlation or not we're looking at a future where people will get rich off of the most insane things. Somebody posted ice cream by I guess family and I think the simpsons tools was it Simpsons or was it family guy made this joke where somebody gets hit in the head and he's like yeah, I was family guy he's on the phone and he's like I,

we should, by a thousand shares of any gets hit and hit a hidden. Hadn't goes waffles, sweet waffles with syrup, and then it everyone on the stock exchange, and I think the nice, the japanese one going waffle, waffle, waffle, they're, just desperately trying to buy waffles, so that stuff happens. Maybe That's the way it'll always be, and it's not going to be concerned about, but I think that's something you should realize. Yes, the printing of money seems will resume and I'll tell you what I did in a second but think people you know ten million people or whatever on Wall Street, that's realizing. They can buy waffles with lots of syrup and make money and be rich for no reason, they're going to start doing it and it's going to be a run on the stock market. It's going to be weird. Meritocracy out the window. Businesses will start seeing their value go up because a guy posted a meme. Apparently people were buying the stock of some company whose ticker symbol was Aagh because it because- and was people were just like by like for no reason. Why not it's it's funny.

The economy is on fire? Our jobs are gone. People are bored so I'll. Tell you what I did I bought batteries. I bought a lot of batteries like these really great reserves batteries and I'm jokingly. Well, I bought Bitcoin recently and I bought Etherium and I've been telling people I'm to buy some chickens. I s look this. These are the most absurd and unstable times. I tell you that we've not seen charts like this before right, the financial times it goes back to nineteen sixty eight. You do not see this massive spike. I we had war constantly throughout these periods when an economic crisis, I don't know when we had the last like an economic crisis, the money supply dropped near like two negatives, and today we literally went negative and today it's a of crisis, but it's spiking. I don't know what you expect.

I just think everyone's kind of lost their mind and everyone's betting on the collapse. I'll put it very simply, I believe that almost everyone now feels that the economy is collapsing or that the system is breaking and they're trying to extract as much value as possible from the system before it falls apart. To put it even simply, I think people think the dollar is not going to be able to do things for you. If you have dollars, I'm not going to tell you what to do, but here's what I did but a lot of ammo. That's because recently I bought some guns, but I believe that there's going to be hyper inflation to to a certain degree. I don't know exactly what a lot of people have warned about this, not an economist, but I take their word for it. We've seen food shortages in Texas due to the storm, but we've also seen food shortages due to Covid and I just think in the long run, we're gonna see prices skyrocket, I've already heard from people that their grocery bills are getting higher and higher, and they're like like is crazy.

I had someone recently tell me they used to spend like a couple hundred bucks a week going T the grocery store. Now they come back and it's like double like four hundred bucks. We had this thing happen here, where I was like. We've got this big production space. We need food for people when they're working like you know it's like an office snack thing. So I said here's a couple hundred bucks go buy stuff and when they came back, I was like where's, the stuff where's the money and they were like. We spend it all, and I was like why it's not even a full card of food, no joke. And so we had a conversation I was like today were they taking money? Where did that money? Go we go to the grocery store to restock you, know, snacks and supplies. I couldn't believe it. So I don't know maybe just maybe move to the middle of nowhere in a more expensive on now. If that make sense, though, things are more expensive in die, but I've heard from other people, they were tweeting stuff about. How like did anybody else notice that the food bills, like your grocery bills, are like going way

up and I'm like dirt otter. Now it makes sense when you look at like they're, just mass printing money and people are working, you can't have people not working and then all of a sudden dumping a bunch of money into the system, because that doesn't seem to make sense. But far be it know me to stuff the I'll leave it their next segment, coming up at four p pm over at Youtube com. Tim cast thanks for hanging out, and I will see you all then.