Today is March sixteenth, twenty twenty one and our first story your media scandal is currently under way after it was revealed that the Washington Post published false quotes from Donal tromp with very little confirmation, just one unnamed source when the Wall Street Journal got a hold of the actual putting it was revealed. The story was fake. What makes the scandal so massive is that several other mainstream news. Outlets pushed the same lie but claimed they had independently confirmed, recording which in fact, did not exist, it seems like the media is biased, say the least, and we likely won't De Annie reckons aviation or correction from money Alan, some refusing to outright admit they were wrong. Our next story mainstream american culture seems to be on the decline ratings for the Grammy's have dropped by fifty three percent. These big Cultural B

that we used to pay attention to like the Emmys, the the Oscars, the Superbowl. They seem to be in decayed and with This comes separation of individuals, differences in view whose opinions and even language, which will ultimately lead to say, the asian and maybe even the breaking up of the: U S, maybe it's a little stream a little ball, but will explore that story and our last story. Segregation is back, the schools, the binding Edmund, duration has reversed a trump policies that barred universe is from implementing racial affinity groups. Many, school districts in blue areas in democrat cities are segregate, students based on race to trigger racial awakenings, most insidiously a white racial awakening. It seems the Democrats are and have been the party of segregation before we get started, though, leave us a good review like the show, give us five stars because it really does help and if you really really like the show, make sure to share it with your friends, because the only way to really grow, applaud

I guess is. If you tell other people, you like the podcast, but enough said, let's get into that. First story: and what is turning out to be one of the biggest media scandals we have seen in a very long time the wash Washington, Post Post, has issued a lengthy correction to an article where they claimed Donald Trump told officials in Georgia to find the fraud and you will be a hero as it turns out. The story is completely false. May you may have heard me talk about this yesterday. My main segment, It wasn't the lead of the segment. I was more concerned about the cultural ramifications of what's happened with the Democratic Party and many people well expressing disdain or disavowing the Democratic Party with a story is actually becoming much more serious. You see while we know the media lies in this instance, the Washington Post put a

for reclaiming they had an independent source confirming this phone call than ever action. The lesson of the phone call. What makes this or so much more insane is Thee numerous news outlets that all claims to have confirmed the exact same lie. Is it my friends? If you look met many people of me and said TIM. How do I convince my friends and family? The media is lying to them or, at the very least, completely irresponsible. My friends, we have another opportunity. So maybe you are one of these people. Maybe you genuinely trust the media and believed them, and I will tell you this: the media's, not all bad. They just get things wrong, often enough to cause very serious problems for our country, So maybe someone shared this video with you, and so you need to watch this understand what the media is doing. I'm gonna break it down for all of you for that. Was that understand this already and haven't heard the story or internet when I say share this video,

Maybe you will find some people who will? Finally, we, why? Because I'm want to go through a series of news outlets that pushed the lie but claimed that they had independently verified what we now know to be false. Salt put it quite simply for you. I was that so many outlets news organization said this conversation with Trump asking someone to find fraud really happen. How can they say that? How did they confirm this? How did every single? How did all of these outlets confirm they didn't, they lied, or, I should say there stand it's our so incredibly low for what they deem to be factual news. They took a random quote from a random person and said boom confirmed in the end. You were lied to or you were misled. I'll put it that way lie and employ

its intent considering. We now know that these, if, if even if we think this news outlets have been duped, the individual who confirmed the call to all these news outlets absolutely lied and that's it. You need to understand what the media operates. Us single source claiming something happened was enough for all of these outlets to push the narrative. Why the trumped up? Perhaps but then think about how easy it is for nefarious actors to manipulate the. Press or maybe or on the left. Maybe a Democrat. Maybe your site What does that? One time will think about it? How many journalists I'll do airports do you think, would be willing to take anonymous court from a Republican whose giving some dubious statement and they'll. Just one of this fact as well, how many smear pieces you think, have emerged on people that you like how many times You are too story we're lucky that can't be true. This is the time where we all need. Look you you need to show people what's happened here,

This is now two months on possibly one of the biggest media scandals we ve seen in years the washing and examined a reports audio, shows the media got the trunk. Georgia story all wrong, do a little bit better wine unexamined, because, while I think your, audio, shows the media fabricated, or it's not just. They got the story wrong. They pushed an absolutely fake story. The examiner reports, I'm sorry, it's an opinion If one thing it's one thing of a single news: outlet publishes a fraudulent anonymously sourced scoop that other thing entirely of multiple newsrooms clay. They independently confirmed the fraudulent scoop. With anonymous sources of their own. The former can be terribly explained away as a simple error. The latter is now so simple. Its unrealistic So many sources would be wrong about the same thing. It's more likely competing. News outlets spoke with the same anonymous individual or individuals, which leads to an uncomfortable question

about whether the media were merely fed bad information or were intentionally manipulated in January, watch it impose, scored a humdinger of a scoop then present Donald Trump still reeling from the result of between twenty election urged Georgia's leak, led elections investigator to quote find the fraud. Lengthy December Funchal saying the official would be a national hero. The Washington Post reported site a single anonymous source who supposedly confirm the details of the private conversation. Other firstly says as post me: three sources. I'm a story. At least that was the standard a long time ago, Parliament is not well right, anymore, place. Gentlemen, I give you The official a p correction published by the Washington Post in a story January thousand twenty twenty one about a phone call between then President Donald Trump, and a lead. Georgia elections investigator the Associated Press based on information, provided by a source. Iranian cely reported that Trump pressed the investigator to quote, find the fraud and setting

would make the investigator a national hero. A recording of the call was made public two months later, a recording that was made to a public two months later revealed Trump did not say either and instead said that if the investigator looked into Fulton County, the investigator would quote, find things that are going to be unbelievable. Trump also told the investigator when the right answer comes out. You'll be praised, it's worse than just correction, it's worse than a series of outlets, actually just somehow confirming the same false details. Some outlets have absolutely refused to issue a hard correct, and are using weasel words to push the same? False narrative and I'll show you that, but first, let's keep reading they gonna, say raw in released audio the phone call released. Audio of the phone call shows that Trump never said those things find the fraud. He never urged the investigations chief to find fraud in the gorges in George's presidential election results. He never promised the investigator would be a national hero, rather Trump said, if you can get to fault encounter,

Georgia, you're, going to find things that are gonna, be unbelievable, the dishonesty he followed this by telling investigators of investigations official she'll be praised when not if she produces the evidence of wrong doing. There is a significant difference between saying you're going to find you're going to find things that are going to be unbelievable. I'm sorry and sends answer, find the fraud. One represents the president notifying an investigations official of voter fraud in a specified county. The other represents the demanding an investigations official get him the results he wants, regardless of the facts of the matter. Further, the Washington Post alleges Trump pressured the official. The report also alleges also that the president's part of the conversation meandered from flattery to frustration and back again, however, with the exception of flattery, a review of the auto, doesn't appear to support these characterizations of the call the Washington Post got it wrong plain and simple. Now they should this correct

if you can believe it. The Washington Post, bumbling bungling its bombshell report, isn't the most scandalous thing about the episode. No most scan. The thing is several newsrooms claimed they independently confirmed the most damning details, b C news reported quote, confirmed the posts, characterisation of the call the resource familiar conversation. Usa tonight claim Georgia official speak and the condition of anonymity to discuss. Internal matters confirm the details of the CALL Abc News ABC News report? Quote President Donald Trump found a chief investigator Secretary of State Brad Reference Burgers office, asking the official to find the fraud and telling this person they would be a national hero for an individual familiar. The matter confirmed to ABC News people, snooze, our unseen and likewise seemingly claimed they. Indeed, dependently confirmed the story through there an anonymous sources. I'd like to show you something I liked I pulled up.

Some of these stories before show you them. I want to stress one other really important aspect of this narrative. The quote was that are really used in the impeachment process. When the Democrat for trying to impeach Trump Post presidency, they used this quote to prove that tromp was things wrong? The media put out a fake story that was confirmed poorly with low standards that should have been blocked by any good and honourable reasonable journalist and then it was used to try and reach the press now. Let me show you some of these things from CNN. Actually, before you see in, and let me say this, we have the story from CNBC. They say Trump pressure, Georgia, top elections investigated to find the fraud and phone call no update the story from January nine from Emma New Burger efforts, CNBC has not yet been corrected. Even though we now know the story is false? And it's been a few days. The story still exists and, of course it absolutely Lee does say

B C news- has confirmed the posts characterisation of the December twenty third call resource when they were the conversation. How do they confirm it did happen, so they pushed a lie. One person who is pushing a false narrative made what ten phone calls and then all of a sudden, you have yourself a national news story, how it works, my friends, a game of telephone, and see what happens as someone right the story, that's clear, Lee sensationalize, it gets them. Traffic all other outlets realize that the risk, if they lose out on this story and so It begin pushing the same narrative and they talk to the exact same people there, so they confirm the details are based on a source where the conversation so who these sources. At this point, I believe it is income upon these news outlets to out these sources for manipulating then for lying? They won't do, of course, because the new of the game is the collusion between the media. Now, while

some of these outlets. Like you today, they still say this. A George officials and the condition of anonymity to discuss internal matters confirm the details of the call to USA. Today this story also not been updated. I'm sorry, I'm sorry. This one actually has been updated. This is amazing. Look at this. That USA today writes correction, a January nine TH. Incorrectly quoted President Donald Trump during a conversation with a Georgia official based on incorrect information provided to USA. Today, a subsequent recording the call published by the Wall Street Journal shows Trump asked the official to look for dishonesty. That's not even true, he said investigate and you will find dishonesty. I think the the I guess fine, maybe even technically the truth, but I love how they still included this line, claiming it was confirmed. Here's my favorite CNN tromp pressure Georgia elections investigated a search for dishonesty of the twenty one about ah updated one. Forty one p m Monday March, fifteenth twenty twenty one. So now

saying he pressure Georgia, elections, investigators to search for dishonesty, that's interesting accords, to the examiner. They say you can't even hear much pressure of anything. It's basically saying investigate what does it mean? Oppressor? Someone This is not a new story, my friends. This is an opinion. Peace is what you need to realize about the media. Trump pressure is an opinion statement. If Donald Trump, Could you please investigate? I think you should you could say he pressured them. You could say he demanded of them. You could say he requested of them. You could say that Trump asked about. They chose the word pressured it creates a framing it's a framing device. That makes it feel as though Donald Trump's yelling at them trying to force them to do it when in reality, Trump could very well be saying. Please help me. Please trump begs for help from Georgia elections investigator to find dishonesty. Here's my favorite part checks out editors, note not even a

correction, you know why CNN won't issue a correction. I say an earlier version of the story published January ninth presented paraphrasing the president's comments to the Georgia elections investigator as direct quotes the store has been updated following the discovery of an audio recording of the call updated, not corrected just an editors, not why, because they did not change the actual now, all they do, is they remove. They removed the words the fraud from the quote. Now it says this. During a stunning, our long phone call earlier this month, Tromp pushed Rapids Burger to quote find votes to overturn election results after is lost about so that that is a different phone call. My new the people of Georgia are angry. People of the country are angry at yadda, rabbits Burger told ABC Good Morning America. He didn't feel pressure from the president, so that's actually a different phone call, which is interesting, a sin and conflicting the two. They say present Donald Trump. Last month

the chief investigator, the Georgia Secretary of state officials, office to search for this firstly, the twenty twenty election telling the individual. Mastication was of national importance. The phone call for supporting the Washington Post is the latest on earth, Africa, okay, so the fine thing was part of the different phone call interesting thing about this. Is that it's about time we get hard actions and they're not doing it CNN is still claiming the exact same narrative they just removed certain quotes. Many olets haven't even done that it's absolutely insane. They say this over the washing examiner, the most likely scenarios abc the Washington Post and others share the same source of or sources. It's either that or a bunch of People manage somehow to be wrong about a very specific claim, which is highly unlikely. The uncomfortable questions we are left with now art to whom did these news outlets? How did the source or sources get the details of the phone call wrong other additional samples of the media reporting bad information provided by anonymous sources. We don't know about merely because

no contrary audio or video, how many anonymously sourced stories are not true. It can happen this easily who, is to say it doesn't happen often further. How many of these bogus stories have enjoyed the backing of supposed independent corroboration when, in fact, newsroom most likely talk to the same person or people. How does one confirm something that is not true, you're asking me. This is exactly what we warned about during the Trump years, when the press dropped all hesitation and standard Regarding the usage of anonymous sources. We warned it would lead to the public. Of dubious or flat out false allegations that are all but impossible to verify. We warned competing newsrooms would feel inclined anyway, to confirm unanimously made allegations with their own name was sources. We warned if even one widely confirmed report basin anonymous sources turned to be false, it would lead only to further erosion of trust in the news industry, now

that we know false reports based on anonymous sourcing can enjoy equally fraudulent corroboration, who is to say there are not more examples of this type of thing. The whole thing is a mess, and it's entirely of the press's own creation, but hey at least the journalist who got it wrong can say they resisted trump. We now have a statement from Donald Trump. He says the Washington Post just issued a correction as the contents of an incorrectly reported phone call. I had with respect to vote or fraud and stated in the great set of Georgia, It is well. I appreciate the washing about Washington Post correction, which immediately makes the joy which a witch hunt a non story? You rigid story was a hoax right from the beginning. I would further appreciate a strong investigation to default in County Georgia and the They see Abrams political machine, which I believe would totally well, I'm not going to be what trumps has, because you too will ban me if I do but Trump thinks it will benefit him to say the least Fulton County has not been properly audited, etc, etc. He's as you will notice that establishment media errors, omissions mistakes in our lies, always slant. One way against me and Republicans

meanwhile, stories that hurt Democrats or undermine their narratives are buried, ignored or delayed until they can do the least harm. After an election, is over look no further than negative coverage of the vaccine that preceded the election and the overdue celebration of a vaccine want the election concluded a strong democracy requires affair. Honest press. The latest media, travesty underscores at legacy. Media outlets should be regarded as political entities, not journalistic enterprises. In any event, I thank the Washington Post for the correction. We then have this Henry Rogers tweets Glenn. This is the impeachment Brit. The fake quote is in it and we can see in the impeachment brief you can see. The quote find the fraud it was. Their fight news. Democrats leaned in leaned on false Wapo, find the fraud quote in impeachment hearings: Rep Madeline, Madeline Dean repeated the now corrected, quotes while encouraging senators to convict Trump in the Senate impeachment trial. The fourth,

the press, these institutions are supposed to be guarding us they're supposed to be protecting the American. People from the lies of manipulations of the authority. There was a big fear with the with the collapse of local journalism, Local politicians will start becoming corrupt and they will get away with it, and I believe that truly does happen. The ideas that it was becoming nationalized that local news isn't as riveting or important to most people, don't care all that much their local comptroller or whatever, so they pay attention more to Donald Trump. That means with less scrutiny on local officials. Corruption will reign supreme. Local news outlets would challenges, officials, the stories would come out and then they would be found culpable of something or or maybe exonerated now it's not happening, but with national level were seeing even with a nationalized press, the the first

among these journalists is for rage. Bait click bake drama trash instead of telling you what really going on, so you can be better informed and make decisions they just tell you what they think will get clicks because they want to sell ads, sell subscriptions and make money, and they accuse me of being a griffin. Meanwhile, I host people than TIM cast our all podcast, that many people criticise and thumbs down me for maybe one about one of the few channels who actually still try to have conversations with people with that you know some people dont like their opinions or be critical of as many people as possible, the girl, biased and, I don't think, I'm pervert at all, although I try to make sure I'm being honest and calling manipulations, because I truly want you to be able to make the best decisions for yourself, and I want to be charge of anything on a mind, my own business, and want to call out those that lie, cheat and steal to gain power. The media doesn't care they're, the true grifters they're, the ones threatened by people like me, because I will call them out other people on

an independent media will absolutely the same. People like Glenn, Green, wild, Matt, Tybee, Michael Tracy, for instance, big fans of those three journalists. Mind you, though absolute we call the lies and establishment press in the manipulations is where we are. We know they lie. Many people haven't been exposed or initiated. I guess this is now becoming a an aspect of my beliefs, dry gases. What people keep repeating that I often say that culture war is people who are discerning and people who are not people who initiated politically and people who are not. The people who are not politically initiated dont know about this stuff than about these problems and don't pay attention. They're, they're, not typically discerning, meaning. You know you you'll, see a new story from CNN go wow, but those of that are familiar with the Gelman Amnesia effect are probably saying out, don't buy this for one second,

and maybe or someone new unity of our continent before and someone share this video with use all explained the government amnesia fact, because I want to whom everybody knows what the says think about something with the way in which you are an expert, maybe a really good at baseball, maybe a huge fan of foot. Maybe you're really good at you know it was across stitch or like knitting or maybe maybe fashion design fabric furniture. Whatever you got some expertise, you pull up a newspaper and it says you know world renowned, knitter, did a double back loop stitch triple variant and your like. That's, not a real thing like this person just made that quite literally made that up your aeronauts garbage idea, and you might be saying that's not a thing would be talking about that. What is this this? This article is fake? What's then, you turn the page figuratively. Making. You click the next link, the next door. You read says war in Syria. You know as insurgent. Does this thing and you

oh wow, I didn't know that was happening. The point is, when you read news about subjects in which you are an expert You can clearly see the falsehoods and well what they got wrong. When you read news- and you are not an expert, did you forget that they were in wrapped in the previous article. That's the government, amnesia effect He read stories, as the layman assume They must be true. Even I now granted, I actually fact check things. So I looked at the correction I saw it was reported and I backtrack some of the claims. That's why I pull up the other stories saying they confirmed this to prove that the washing examiner was correct, because I actually tried to investigate, find the source material. But there are many people who read the news just believing it to be true. The problem is the media will also tell you corporate press that independent voices are bigots and far right and conspiracy theorists. Well, they ve created a trap if you are not,

discerning and you blindly just trust the media you're gonna blindly to the channels like mine are lying. More importantly or worse still, there are political activists that doing it for money, they're doing it for ideological game. They'll take quote from out of context they take only the worst possible statements they would assume I would make so I could say something like Mcconnell is bad and should be impeached. And Nancy Policy is bad and should be impeached and though only take the court about Nancy Policy, to poison the well among those who don't watch my content to the day believe I'm strictly critical of Nancy Policy and not basically everybody to become only on rather pessimistic and many waste. Unfortunately, a trauma I ll try to do better, but that's the name, the game they dont want people to actually see counter information. Think about CNN very famous moment with brine stouter when he told his audience not to watch Fox news.

Or because you know they're the spin, where the real is only watch us anyway. It was telling you not to seek out other opinions. Are information is trying to trick you? I won't tell you to do that elsewhere. Say, go watch CNN see what Brian Stelter has to say and if I'm wrong then so be it. You also had. I think it was Jake Tapper, But you can't read the Wikileaks emails. It's illegal only weaken rate it yeah, don't read the emails that are getting released publicly, that you're allowed to read any one was telling you only come to me for the truth is lying to you, I'm running out of time I sometimes don't have the specific citation pulled up and I'll. Tell people to fact check me as a meme about it. I'll say fact check me. I could be wrong

on this one. Maybe I got that one wrong and I definitely got that one wrong and when I get things wrong or when stories change, I should corrections. What about CNN Baden due to issue a correction? They shouldn't editors note and they just removed the quotes but kept the story. The same opinion pieces masquerading as news now. A lot of what I have just done today is, of course, opinion commentary on new stories, but its journalistic in the sense that I fact check some of the claims before I just started. Reading this I looked at what washing examiner said: Paul the sources they claimed had made these statements and then confirmed many of them dead. I can't confirmed some of them. That's why didn't show them, so I shall leave it at that. The media is not here To be your friend, the media is a corporate machine. Designed to make money is a cat is a capitalistic enterprise. If you

for someone who views yourself as on the left or a socialist, and you dont like capitalism, never forget these companies, even Fox NEWS, right, Bart CNBC, the New York Times, I don't care who they are and where they lean. Their goal is to make money from you. I guess it is what it is: it's going to require people to have a critical eye of the media. If we're going to solve this problem, but I'll leave it there. Next segment is coming up at one the item on this child. Thanks bring it out, and I will see you open the grammar, have been generating quite a bit of controversy with some of their performances. One that I criticized depicted riots where wrapper performed a song is name is little baby. It showed the police is bad guys. The rioters effective

He has good guys and an activist came out joining the set apparently saying we do need allies, we'd accomplices. It was effectively a pro black lives, better riot message now on that one for cancel culture. That's it's their free speech if when I put out bs I'll, be here to counter it, and if you like it, you can watch it but still lead to many people. Questioning the choices for, for one thing is to make a Mallory activist, has been accused of being an antisemite by the New York Times and it caused a lot of controversy for the women's March, for which she was a founder, because people heard some pretty crazy stories about her. I don't necessarily trust the mainstream press, so maybe it's not true, but you did come out and say we need accomplices. Next, we saw Cardi B's performance of web and many people like do who wants to watch this overly sexual Ized award programme? I mean it's just not something we want our kids or families to be watching, and maybe that's a contributor.

the ram, his writings or in the gutter, but I don't think this is a get woke, go broke. Necessarily it may be a get broke, go woke kind of where the Grammy's knew they were failing. They knew that, are facing some serious problems with ad revenue or interest, so they tried to make a show as shocking as possible and endeavour to generate press but either. If an honest questioning when it comes to this party be stuff, what family wants their kids to act? Billy. Watch this like hyper sexual ized behaviour. On tv I mean look, it's one thing. What we ve had in the past scandal, Eclat women jumping around and maybe that cross the line for a lot of families are, they would watch what web takes it a step further. I gotta be completely honest, plus the depiction rights, how many suburban or middle Americans are like? I, like my kids watching the stuff. Many of them probably said- I'm not interested more importantly out have any of the criticism in the controversy. I think we may just be seeing a fright imitation of american Mainstream Culture awards

We are not doing well and its because nobody cares. We have the opportunity to ouch or listen to whatever we want these days it used to be the guy. M you came on it. It was a big cultural moment. It was what was and everybody decided to watch it. You'll get massive ratings and make massive money. Now everything seems to be breaking apart and with this fragment fragmenting of culture, there is a desperate attempt from the establishment to create this kind of money. Culture get everybody back into the same narrative. The only problem is there overly woke and apply to many double standards which is causing problems who to be involved in an authoritarian culture where there are haves and have nots based on which ideology you believe now. So a lot of people are going to say, not interested, I'm not going to watch, and this doesn't bode well for the massive corporate machine. So let me just say with a bit of optimism as the Grammys fails, as the wokeness fails to net them that audience they want. The good guys may be winning

those who believe in freedom, individuality, free speech, etc. We may be actually taking ground as they lose audience more and more people watching shows like mine. So maybe that's where we're headed I want to show you some of the controversy in what's going out the ratings in the collapse, but I want to make sure I point this out. First and dont bury the lead check this out. Grammy awards twenty twenty one earns aid to eighty two million dollars and national tv add revenue. It may be that what's happening with extreme. Culture is a path towards destruction. It may be that in the next few years they do really really add. Maybe this time around the ratings are getting really really bad, but the revenues- still there, but when the advertisers looked, to the viewer ship and they say, while we overspent on this programme. Well, Then there will be a delay and then the next year or two ad rates will drop precipitously as nobody wants to watch this trip

first, let me just give you the straightforward view of what's happening from the New York Times. Amy's television audience shrinks to a new low. They say the acts of awards show, writings continues: viewers ship foresight, a Grammy awards on CBS, fell to eight point. Eight million viewers, according to Nielsen Throb television, from that's a new low for the show and a fifty three percent drop compared with last year's show, which drew eighteen point: seven million viewers the Previous low was seventeen million in two thousand sex when green a one recorded the year two weeks earlier. The goal globes lost sixty two percent of its audience, attracting six point: nine million viewers and NBC Viewer ship for all lie television events had plummeted. As p life seemed less enthusiastic about watching three hour events part packed with commercial breaks. The Superbowl last month fell to to a fifth ten year low in viewership, and it

there is. There is limited interest in a ceremony that has been scaled down because aquatic krona virus precautions, but unlike the golden globes or the most recent Emmy awards broadcast, which had had a record low and viewers ship. The Grammy awards managed to avoid the use of zoom to power. The ceremony and the show did not lack in star power with performances by Harry Styles, Taylor, Swift, Billy, Eilish, Meghan, the stallion and cardi B, The show at more than three and a half hours drew praise for its production with a mix of lies, performances and a small ceremony in an open air tent outside the staple centre in downtown Allay Trevor, no other shows how likewise received warm reviews. Still the right things. News is likely to have alarm bells for the Academy of motion, picture arts and sciences and the Academy awards broadcaster, ABC view. Worship of last year's Oscars broadcast fell to a low of twenty three points million nominees for this year's awards were announced Monday and Sarah

only is scheduled for April twenty fifth, my friends. What this really is is cultural collapse. We talked about a quite a bit many, us here on Youtube. Several years ago I mentioned that you know. One of the things actually really liked it would like to talk about press on is the stagnation of american culture. Let me ask you a question When was the last time a Christmas song was written, and I mean like a Christmas song that became something that we would repeat every year. Most people will say, you know Maria carries all I want for Christmas. Is you wasn't like that? net or something? Maybe I'm not entirely sure? But my question is about we a the same songs. Jingle Bell Rock was a sign from the fifties at a certain point. Is our asking this question like wasn't that song knew at some point? Why do we just keep repeating the same things every year? Why is it that we have become completely stagnant and rapid?

chess movies become big smash. Blockbusters instead of interesting thought provoking. Movies or stories like Groundhog Day, I remember why Jim Groundwater. Things is unique story. What we get we get derivative stories we get happy there. They and we get to you- know live lived, I repeat edge of tomorrow whenever they renamed to note northern Morocco a fan, I like those movies, entertaining it's fun to play with ideas and make new iterations of similar ideas, but we're getting. Movies that are adaptations. Tv shows that are adaptations, Remax, remakes, remake spider we make every few years Batman Remit. We got another Batman remit come with another Superman Remit common the issue, as people are sick of it there tired their board, everything's boring. What are you doing new video games have come out that are particularly interesting to many people. Right now should certainly there are some What we are seeing, in my opinion, is an absolute fragmentation in the collapse of american culture. It has a lot to do with weakness. In my opinion,

but has a lot to do with the internet, and I think it is a lot to do with just a general cultural decay. We are not pushing new ideas. We are experimenting with stories anymore. Nobody wants to take that economic risk. Well, I think I might, but I think a lot of people are scared. They're scared that they pressed the line. You know they decide here will be something unique: the lose money, certainly there Andy Films and are being it ain't there, where you can make them cheaper and cheaper what mainstream culture? It's done, The unifying seek Day seasons and award programs that Americans used to sit behind and watch are collapsing. Reward show collapsing the Superbowl collapsing. So what happens? My friends as we talk about the culture war? One thing we often don't actually get deeply into is literal. Culture we talk about how you have the woke laughed and you have the

and had a deterrence, and then you have the right in the conservatives in the populist. But what are we actually talked about the fact that in the culture war, the culture that makes up the bedrock for which we are battling on is falling apart. Never been some people decided to make new, shows a new games, and things like that. I respect it, but they find smaller niece audiences, not enough to create a unifying fur there have been some tv shows that brought I've owing to gather sailor game of thrones, but in the past, see if you season. The show just fell to trash This criticism of Grammy's and on how to keep going up. You know this. This idea to talk about the revenue and where I think we're headed the washed in time says wow. This is on network tv, wrong? She Grammy Ward, sparks outrage and sheds viewers. They say not even the most. Was it showing Grammy awards. History could turn out the viewers. The sixty third you will award ceremony that aired Sunday and CBS was on pace to

a ratings low with the times on adjusted audience of eight point. Eight million fewer ship plunge, despite or maybe because of a politically woke, show that featured tributes to last year's blacklist protests and a speech from former women's March leader to Mc Mallory, who declared President Biden. We demand justice, equity and policy to adjust this equity policy. The programme moved quickly from P d. To end see seventeen, however, when wrapper Cardy beat it a pull, dance and performed her hit song web, joining mega these stallion for an explicit interlude and a giant bed. In that for mainstream news outlets was indescribable quote as a new service. That must adhere to. Rick editorial standards. We can't tell you what wop stands for and we can't really say what mega these dine and party be were wrapping about or similar

during their performance either the BBC set in its coverage. Let's just say that the live tv debut performance of their actuated hit took place on a giant bed and they did not look up at all tired. The british network said, in other words, the episode went well beyond the most memorable performance of the two thousand Doesn't three MTV Mute Music Video wards when Madonna and Britney spears Kester during a song, but it failed to spark anything resembling the same uproar so Viewers were certainly surprised. Wows on network tv too, it: CNN senior editor Brandon Greg's, the Grammy's tweeted, what a performance with emerges and emotions of hand claps, eyeballs and fire billboard magazine called it a truly wild performance. Conservatives who took note tied their comments to the entertainment industry council culture. The left is fine with a disgusting performance. Cardy beaches gave the Grammy's but Doktor Zeus's too dangerous for our children. Tweeted turning point USA foundered, Charlie

referring to Doktor Susan Enterprise. Actresses enterprise decision is upsetting the books in how worth editor the daily wired. Kids are now more likely to see Cardi B doing this than DUMBO the nineteen forty one animated film, recently Brock blocked from Disney plazas children menu because of Rachel stereotypes. Let me tell you, what's going on, it's called low common denominator culture? What do you get from Disney films like DUMBO or doctors books? Some of them contained offensive imagery and stereotypes. I, for one, don't care all that much if they stop selling them or if they do. If you don't like it, you can make your own things right, but these are things that we used to tell our kids. You should watch I think it's a sign of cultural decay when we don't make new things and that's why I'm partly critical of money on the right nor screaming about this. Unlike it's time for something new. If you're just repeating cultures of the past, their will nothing eventually but derivatives and hand me downs. At the same time,

however, what we can see from the Grammy's Lois come denominator culture? Let me explain if someone gets offended by doktor suits it doesn't matter. If it is a hundred people or ten people, it must be gotten rid of. If people are offended with DUMBO it doesn't matter, It must be gotten rid of now. Conservatives are offended. The performance we get from Cardy B and a very explicit performance shore, but its lowest common denominator. Adult gratification will we'll call it that they're trying to maximize how many people will watch, because they know what they represent is already dead. The mainstream culture. In this tree is falling apart. Major news outlets ratings are collapsing, national, I'm sorry, local news is collapsing.

There seems to be this weird effect the internet has had on us here. Well, actually I shouldn't say it's weird: it's predictable people are now able to watch whatever they choose to watch so with three hundred and thirty million people you end up with tens of lessons or hundreds of thousands of prominent channels on Youtube and other websites. They can go to to get there then their narratives, so it is completely decentralized. The conversation now the Grammy's are completely irrelevant to anybody. After a year of being beaten over that insane politics, how many people going to care to watch some weird sexual ized performance from these, these artists sort of Wanna column, and it's so ridiculous. As soon as we get from from near post did cardy be fart during her during her Grammy's wipe performance on a giant bed. What were they? Thinking

tell you what they were thinking, they're, desperately trying to shock as many people as possible and pander to the lowest common denominator, which is baser level instincts. I suppose I remember back in. I think it was like two thousand and four I'm hanging out at my friend's house, and we were playing you know, knights of the Old Republic, on all who holds that it was an xbox. I think I can remember and then, buddy gets home and he's like YO. Let's watch some tv and you know referencing night to the Old republic because it was a long time ago. I think it was seven or, and we put on a family guy. I think I think it was family guy. I don't remember- and I said something like dude in the sure there's gonna be one channel, that's nothing but like the simpsons, you can literally just like turn on the Simpsons Channel, and we were all like a dude crazy. We laughed about it. The recently did was because we're lucky these cable channels, where, like it was Like three hours of the Simpsons, I was right today you can go onto Hulu and just play. How many

So it's either of the Simpsons Hundred's over what like thirty years, you will not be to watch every single episode in a single day. What, with what with work and food in everything? It would take you quite some time ago. Every single episode. I mean it could do it in a relatively short amount of time, but a reference that, because everything has become absolutely hyper focused. People are choosing to go to political channels where they get their literal. Politics said back at them. People come to a channel like mine. This one Just over a million subscribers- and I talk about things and been a moderate perspective, but there are people who don't like me because their staunch trump supporters or there are just general conservatives, so they'll go to like next, even greater their progressive like this and won't watch it at all, even though many trump supports probably would watch my content. There are many on the left who will go and only watch one progressive and get the news distilled through that one individual. That's all they care about, they developed a routine and they can watch the shows they want to watch. But this leads us to a dangerous place. You see the culture

or is it just about whether or not one side is going to win over the other such about libertarian verses authoritarian? It's about whether or not we as a country we may cohesive and actually share something that we want to defend and protect. If you watch certain progressive view, tubers you'll end up believing things that aren't true but will drive you towards a left trip, tribal list approach, and maybe you think you know that was certainly there I say that our true, but do I get things wrong, so I am not saying that these people on the left will tell you lies many of them well The right will tell you lies. I think it's an except in a rule system. Like many, the right are more likely to give you information that is factually accurate because they know you can go watch, whatever you want and in the mainstream progressive space because they do have establishment control, they say, are they because they know their audiences captive and tens not to go anywhere else, but now we're getting people war saying instead of watching the Grammy's watched him pool, but the people were TIM Pool might now watch any other channels. New definitely should, but how

time, do we really have the day for our programmes think about this sea back in the day it was the Simpson It was on a seven or a star trek the next generation airing on UPN at eight p m or whatever, when it was syndicated. I think it was a CBS show. I can't remember, or NBC, or something without a budget channels. So at this date, at this time, you'd go home. You turn the tv on an tens of millions of people. What I'll watch the exact same thing? Maybe it's the Grammy's, then they would all go and talk about it. I work today people go home and with what little time they have, there is competition or their attention. Some will choose me somewhat: choose cock Linsky some will choose Dixon hammer, but then their views will be shy the very specifically by a single show. They watch and not everyone else does watch because of this. There is no real unity. There are a lot of people who put out overt lies about me. I try to avoid talking about individuals and their channels and in specific ways or accuse them of doing things publicly, because well I don't

such every single one of calculate skis: videos on a watch, every single one of Stephen Craters videos, but you see people build up this world view based on increasingly smaller cultural factions, where that leads us we'll talk about money, the grim is poles and eighty eighty, two million dollars and national tv add revenue, that's really good for them. They'll probably do this again steer, but the revenue will probably be cut in half or more because what's gonna happen is auditors advertisers owing to say you didn't pull on the numbers and we took a loss. I x, amount of dollars. I only made why amount of dollars the number was less than I spent, so it wasn't worth it for me I'll tell you what I will give you a less money for the add there. You go the Grammy's and at last, but will also notice they overspent last year, and they won't want to do it again and they know the writing, for the game is our collapse. So, the Grammy's may eventually just get cancelled. What happens then? It's really interesting, while there certainly making money today there is something that's going to be affecting us that I think will

this country to disillusion, and I'm not talking about civil war. I've talked about the potential for conflict and civil war, quite a bit a lot of people, people the left, just don't care to hear it and that I think it's an absolute or that I know all everything, but I do think we're in a cold conflict of some sort and that's a quote from a Princeton professor- were fighting each other, we're at each other's throats all the time, but we're all watching different people, even those on the right watch, different people in France. I don't watch Ben Shapiro period maybe I watched even caught her. Sometimes I tend not to watch a whole If anybody there a lot of peace, Probably only watch bench appealed, don't watch me or they watch crowd or not than Shapiro, and thus their getting different views and different opinions. The famous for the left. Ultimately, what I see happening is, while there may be an ongoing cultural conflict across the board, the collapse of a unified culture in this country. The stagnation of culture, in my opinion, will lead to a point where we no longer care to be involved with other. As a community you'll end up seeing

people and you know New York watching different content, specifically aimed at them and their politics and their opinions, and there are people like this pacifica, I'm sorry in the in the Atlantic North Northeast when their opinions are very varied from those in other parts of the country. Instead of getting a national address. We are now seeing a president who gives up he get you up. Let me clarify instead of getting addressed to the nation as a whole. We get a president who gives an address to the blue states and other than the address is to everybody. It doesnt know one agrees that you have read states I now We're not gonna, do what you say: there's no cultural unity, so me. Let me try and wrap this up, otherwise I think it's becoming to verbose the Grammy doesn't matter to me. Amusement of this matters. What matters is that the unifying culture that we had The conversation we had, I mean even game of thrones, contributed to vest of unifying of culture is collapsing

we are on a watch whatever they want to watch they're going to talk about water. They wan to talk about, makes it harder for us to associate with others and our own neighbors to be able to go to work and at the water cooler like hey. Do you see that new movie that just came out well now movies are over Covid shut down the movie industry for the most part and now you turn on Amazon, whatever there's thousands of movies so which one did you watch hated? You see at movie. What's it called it's called spiral, never sought. What's that one, you know it's his movie. Well, ok, not much talk about not much to share. Maybe people are going to stop watching ratings ratings are down for literally everyone's. I wonder what people are really doing. Maybe there's a net positive because its so much that we're going to our culture will collapse, but that people will start developing new fine cultures run new ideas, but here's my prediction. I think that as more and more people dissociate with a greater american culture. You end up with people care, less and you end up push

the United States towards something that very much may be a peaceful divorce, not because of the culture war, but because we just don't care about each other anymore. Maybe economic ties will force things together, but when you combine the culture war, what happens when you get to a point where there is public. Fighting people argue about Trump Trump winds. They say. Why are we going to accept this wise? Why why? Why would eighty million people accept a president? They don't want. What happens then, when someone's like do we watch the same movies. We barely speak the same language. The woke versions of words is different from what most Americans recognize. They have their own semantics, colloquial use of words. So what happens when we are speaking a different language watching different movies and physically fighting with each other, the collapse of the culture? That's what I see happening so again, we can cut size, the Graham is, we can say their down. We can say there there woke or whatever so to get well go broke thing. It's an american decay. And I guess I could rent on this for a long time, but I'll leave it there. Next segment is coming up at four.

Yeah, I'm over at Youtube COM slashed him cast thanks, rang out, and I will see you all them near the end of Donald Trump administration. He passed an executive order. Barring many elements of critical race theory trainings in the federal government. He also barred contracting companies that used these similar trainings. The media screen that tromp was banning diversity trainings, but that's a manipulation. They weren't tell you what was actually going on. They were using clever words and false framing to make it seem like Donald Trump was a big it when in Rio, Many of these programmes outright violated, the nineteen sixty four civil rights ACT, if you're somebody who doesn't reach beyond the news, believe what you hear on tv, which is probably not many of you without any at all. Well then, you're, just to believe it, Donald Trump as a big it and he's pushing the far right white supremacist ideals, but eventually, look into. What is executive order was, and what was going on you realize Donald Trump was correct.

The Iragon Democrats a whole lot of this channel, and for this many people say you know TIM conservative or his right wing, but in fact I'm actually not recently tweeted that Joe Biden's progressive income tax doesn't go far enough will actually did a feature on my phone, so it doesn't go too far enough. In fact, I'm pretty left on many issues, but I take specific with media deceptions and pushing of agenda, which I view to be overtly racist segregation is back, it's getting worse, it's been getting worse. And I and many others have been talking about this for years. It is not the Republican Party push segregation race basis gaining an overt racism. Theirs certainly some elements of the right and republican Party. Many of these individuals have been excised from the party. However, it is the Democrats That seems to be doing everything in their power to bring back racism and segregation and

I'm going to show you definitively and prove it gives you have you the Republicans as stagnant and obstructionist I'm not a fan of Mitch Mcconnell or the Republican Party leadership, because not only Do I disagree with many of the republican Party policies. They don't fight for anything anyway. So there's thing to really be upset about other than their obstructionist. Ok, they do have some policy positions I disagree with. They ve tried to push, but for the most part, what do they do? The Democrats are on offer and Donald Trump was on offence, and that was about it. There were some good things about Trump, many bad things: but the Democrat seem to be worse than a meme. Among conservatives, Democrats have long been the Party of Jim Crow segregation, slavery, etc. While this is historically true, you often get media outlets say yes, yes, but the parties flipped they ve changed. Maybe, but I'm sorry you, if I just don't see it, it is the Democrats. Today, king racial affinity groups raced base. Segregation is,

blue cities is urban centres that are pushing these policies, and typically is the Republican saying no to this finally for most of us, they disagree with segregation and violations the Civil Rights ACT or who believe in doktor kings. Dream republicans, don't do anything to fight back, except, of course, for Donald Trump, where the story from March Seventh, you Wes Department of Education, curbs decision on race, based affinity groups, affinity groups are basic basically racially segregated groups, universe is due this grade school elementary schools do this and they do it for very overt and racist reason. And I'm going to show you it's back cycle. Jason is getting worse Colombia, just They announced what were learning is hosting site separate graduation ceremonies based on income level, race and ethnicities. Linsey gram for all

his problems, are going to for slammed racial reparations in the covert relief bill. My friends, let's read the new, but let me start by saying we will not solve the problem of racism by segregate the races and providing money to people based on race when the problems tend to be class based and education based and I'll. Show you exactly what bide missed. When and why it so insidious? And then we'll go to the news about what it was segregation expanding across the. U S before we get started had over the TIM cast dot com to become a member and get access exclusive members only podcast segments with a bunch of really great, relations. Either we talk about the collapse of the Anti S. Jake, Will you u toolbars and why it happened? And when you become a member at TIM Guest you're providing safety net. For me and my company in my employees in the event that we get purged or banned, we will see we'll be able to produce content, albeit the reach, wouldn't be nearly as far but at least we.

Still exist in some form, but don't forget to like share subscribe, hit that notification bell. Let me read you the story from the New York Post. They say the: U S: departure education suspended a decision that found racial affinity, groups discriminated against students and staff, the posters learned the goal of the programmes used by New York City, public school system and other school districts is to separate students and staff by racial groups in order to help address discrimination and white privilege, but the practice of separating score rules into racial groups is discriminatory. Determination obtained by the post found the findings ray during the waning days of former president trumps time in office in early January. We're in response to a complaint by the Chicago area, school districts, racial equity, training,. Programmes and lesson plans. Sources, said the findings if implemented could apply to New York City. Other school districts. The post last year exclusively by exclusively reported about city,

Early childhood teachers being asked to be segregated into discussion groups based skin color, race, ethnicity and ethnicity. Following the George, Lloyd, killing at the hands of Minneapolis police and the violent riots that followed after they said, protest, I'm correcting them. Critics rip the initial initiative for pet Wayne, racial stereotypes, one Manhattan principle even asked parents to reflect on their whiteness to address white supremacy, white privileged discrimination. The eighteen page letter of finding drafted by the Federal Department, Education Office of civil rights Enforcement director Carol Ashley, was triggered by a comply followed by a former and Y, see arts teacher who now works in the Evanston Skokie Illinois School District. The deal e findings said the Evanston Skokie School District violated civil rights law by separating administrators in a professional development training programme in August. Twenty nine,

into two groups based on race, white and non white, offering various racially exclusive affinity groups that separates students, parents and community members by race implementing a disciplinary policy that included explicit direction to staffers to consider a student's race when, when meeting when mapping out discipline carried a color resume privilege, walk at separated, seventh and eighth grade students into different groups based on race, quote If you are white, take two steps forward if your person of color with dark skin, take two steps back, if you're black take two steps back, the privilege walk exercise said the girl, was for white students to learn more about white privilege, internalized dominance, Microgram, Russians and how to act as an ally for students of color. The lesson plan said Ashley of the deal we concluded, the school district engage in intentional race discrimination by coordinating and conducting all exclusive affinity groups, which resulted in

separation of participants, indistinct programmes based on right, in violation of the title six regulation, my friends, that is quite literally the nineteen Sixty four civil rights ACT, these blue these urban districts, these democratic politicians, these people in the Biden Ministration they are absolutely reactionary. Which means they are trying to bring us back to a time long since passed reacting to the change the revenue, and brought about by the civil rights movement which de segregated this country, when I was covering Ferguson and Baltimore Riots this was over the police killings of certain individuals. There were certain rooms these organizing areas that were segregated for certain people of certain races- and I thought it was act. We scary and shocking. They said it. The safe space only for people of color or the african diaspora. I thought segregation was wrong. We're supposed to be fighting to be one of one one country, one people, one planet, when human race. Instead

you actually have people like Don Lemon on CNN, demanding that people see color. I think it's fair to point out There are issues of racism that we need to deal with things important point out that we should note these things, but great from it. Programmes would still violate the nineteen, sixty four civil Rights ACT and honestly it'll only make things worse. We have now brought ourselves to a point in this country where we have ended most of the racist programmes and laws, if not all of them. Now there are still remnants, this racism, but the saloon- and here isn't to bring back racist policy or racial discrimination, though that's what the intersection of art and tearing left would want to do. That will only make things worse. Now. I can already tell I whatever ever bring this up. There are many in the left to say TIM. You are wrong. Affinity, groups are a good thing. Let me break down for you, the poor plums we have, and I want to show you this racial affinity groups from the anti racist.

Ask him in Sacramento City, and I want to read for you the first paragraph I did cover this before, but in this context of what's happening with universities. It's important to bring up again for those in art familiar. This is from these Echo Manto City, anti, racist classroom document, which reads racial affinity, groups, offer a structure of inquiry and can address he needs they support us in exploring what has been forbidden, forgotten and unhealed. For example, in racial affinity groups, white people can discover together their group identity, they can cultivate racial solidarity and compassion and support each other. In sitting with the discomfort, confusion and numbness that often accompany white racial awakening, they can also discern white privilege in its impact without the aid or dependence on people of color white people who have formed racial affinity. Groups can report that they recognise their collective commonality and shared history, as well as the impact that their privilege has

and other races and on each racial affinity. Group member- they going to say well many poc- may not need an affinity group to help them relate to their racial group membership. They may need to explore the diversity that exists among Poc and across Poc without having the distraction of having to educate white people on whiteness and it's harm. What they're basically saying they want different groups based on race. They would take all of the small white children and put them in a group to ask them to learn about their shared history. My question is: what do you think that shared history would be, and why would you in just assume it would be inherently negative? Why would these young white people who get together and talk about their race despise their history or view at negatively? Why? Wouldn't they view it positively? My whole life, you now I've. I grew up in a mixed race, family. I've heard about these splendor wonder

an advancements of european settlement in North Amerika. I learned about atrocities in the trail of tears and really horrifying thing slavery, for instance, but typically we What we learn about the inventions, the developments, the technologies, the methodologies of the mostly, if not all, white founding fathers- and I mean span, simply founding fathers. There are many people who, I think, contribute to the founding of this country. Well after the inception of his country and well before, and not all of those ideas came from white people, but for the most part we are told. Historically, it was the white founding fathers and their ideas. If you put these children into these groups- and you follow a logical path, what would you discover? We are a great American, melting pot. We are a great country with great ideals that has resulted in the most expensive set of civil rights for any country on the planet and though we are far from perfect, we are probably want most tolerant societies in the world, and how did it happen why it was

ideology of classical liberalism in the founding fathers who happen to be white? What happens then, when you demonize attack and force these groups to have a racial awakening, they're not going to sit there and self pity, and so they hate them. So many might and many others might actually just become white supremacists segregation is back, it is being pushed by Democrats. Not Republicans, which brings me to the New from today at Columbia, University is hosting six separate, graduation ceremonies with race and ethnicity being partly the defining factor in these different ceremonies. Fox NEWS, says: Columbia University is planning to hold six additional graduation ceremonies for students according to their race and other aspects of how they benefit the New York City. Schools website detail graduation ceremonies for native asian latin acts and black students taking place for Colombia, college Colombia, Engineering,

general Studies and Barnard College at the end of April. Another dubbed fli graduation for first generation and or low income community the school also oh, a lavender graduation for the LGBT Iaq plus community due to chrono virus restrictions of ceremonies will take place online. It's unclear when the port ceremonies were announced, but Sunday was the debt. Line for nominating individuals in Colombia. College Let me engineering and general studies for the Multi cultural affairs, graduation courts Columbia University did not Emily respond to a comment. Last month, Young America's foundation flag, a white only caucus about sex he'll, take place able to university. It was intended to quote give white people a space to learn about the process, learn about and process their awareness of and complicity in unjust systems without harming our friends of color according to an email distributed by the university, the university said

the event was organised by a group of students and eventually did not take place, because it would have been at at odds with university policy and don't and don't forget you s, law and University of Michigan Dearborn, there's a big contravene controversy over. They were calling, a phase. They announced a white only and non white, only Digital CAFE where people could meet gather and talk about these things. Quite literally a racial affinity group. The events were cancelled. The website was taken down there, My understanding it was interesting that the initial backlash shut down the website promoted a racially segregated gathering for white people and people who aren't white if it was really about promoting diversity. Wouldn't there be a multitude of Rachel if it into groups more than just whiten on white, maybe that's why

taken down me. That's why it was stopped, but now we're seeing quite literally the same thing across many different universities and advocacy for it coming from school districts and even Joe Biden Department of Education. Let me show you some things from reason. They say this is from August twenty. Fourth, we twenty, yes black and why you students demanded segregated housing. No, the university didn't agree to it quote and why you not have, does not have and will not create student housing. Excludes any student based on race. My question is how long, how long until this falters, like the other, you know, p, C Cafe and Non Poc CAFE event. They did it eventually collapse and how they are doing racial affinity groups how long until and why you does actually implement racially segregated dorms from Forbes November fifteenth, twenty eighteen,

Racial segregation on american campuses, a widespread phenomenon, Forbes Says- or I should say the author, Richard veteran, the National Association of Scholars, a group most of mostly academics, interested in higher education, issues, only a few research reports annually, but what they lack in quantity they make up in quality. Their studies are extremely carefully done with well documented. Research are young, and s employed on Pierre DE on peer has been searching the segregation of students on college campuses by race, special comment, exercises for african american students, living and recreation facilities segregated erase black student unions and so forth. These practices have existed for decades on some campuses and rather than fading as racial prejudices decline. Witness rapidly increasing interracial marriage as they are flourishing,

Pierre study, mostly completed, should be released around Martin Luther King dynamically. Uniting all is this. All of this is terribly ironic in nineteen. Fifty four in Brown be brown V border education of Topeka, the? U S Supreme Court actively outlawed racial segregation in our schools. Angry white especially in the south, fought the attempt to integrate schools, often leading to violent protest such as when James Meredith became the first black student to enter the University of Mississippi and nineteen sixty two civil rights leaders put their lives and align working for a color blind non race determine society most memorably king, when he articulated his dream, where people quote? Will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character. The bitter struggle to break down Rachel distinctions and education lasted for decades. Now universities are reintroduce segregation making raise the price

very determinant of student participation in some activities, such as black student unions or raced based housing facilities. I maybe, biased my friends, because many of you who are frequent viewers of my content know exactly why this is always freaked me out and we have never been a fan of damage, policy towards Rachel Segregation and critical race theory, and it's because I from a mixed race, family, second generation. It's because I witness, discrimination against my dad, based on his race, even though he was part of an interracial marriage with interracial kids. He was still, he still face detriment based on his race, which made no sense. We were, we were anything but privileged We were supposed to be this family that represent the future of this country, that the progressives fought so hard for that people like Doktor king in a civil rights, are fought so hard for that after lovingly,

Virginia. We were finally supposed to be accepted and actually benefit from the great privileges of the society, but in fact it was the progressive and the Democrats who fought so hard and are continuing to fight to make it all worse. For people like me and my family. Meanwhile, you have many unwitting there. I a useful idiots who support this policy from Democrats, maybe because it grants power or because they are actually white supremacists. Perhaps you don't agree, and you don't believe me, but let me show you used. Let me show you a statement and a comic to break down what is actually happening recently Bill bar the comedian was called racist and it probably has to do a lot with his comedy, which is particularly offensive, but it stems from his appearance. I believe it was at the Grand museum sure, where he mispronounced a a woman's name name. He just pronounced poorly

Sorry, if I'm butchering your name well, he was called racist. A woman on Twitter posted Jen's, calling Biber a racist Wilber and his beautiful wife MIA bill. Burr is in fact married to a black woman, and I don't think that matters. I think there are two people who love each other, good for them. I'm I'm glad I'm. Actually. It's actually amazing that we can see how far we have come in terms of Inter of civil rights and where we. Today in terms of accepting people who just love each other. However, a man named Clayburn Griffin, a verified twitter user tweeted. After this image while I'm not suggesting biller is racist, a white man having a non white wife, so safe Claver and Griffin sometimes be a sign of racism. So you shouldn't assume someone isn't racist just because they own, and it is his word, a minority what's

just say: love servant they may very well- and this is what Clayborn says have have one, because they are racist, one of the most shocking displays of overt race system. I have ever seen on this platform and its come. From someone purportedly on the progressive left now, of course, there are many progressive who push back on p, like this, and slam, then, is not indicative of every single person on the left, mind you, but it is enough. There are elements of the far right that are crazy and creepy, and I think yes, that's enough to be criticized and to criticize what they believe. But I have no problem criticizing fringe far farright conspiracies and I have no problem criticizing fringe far left conspiracies. The issue is that while Trump may have Emboldened some of these people he has never been, the establishment has never been the media and he bear. He struggled to action, maintain any semblance of an administration when he was president. Many of his appoint

is turned on him. John Bolton was a dumb who stabbed stabbed in the back and Trump struggled to get a lot done. The establishment, political political class Democrats and Republicans they push many narratives that we must be concerned and, right now and in the past several years, the past decade, it has been the establishment Democrats with tacit support from progressives, pushing this ridiculous behavior. There are many dirt bag left us. They call themselves that I absolutely respect for calling out the whole the critical race theory- and I love the means there was one. I think it was from Cal Kolinsky Progressive, where it said something like we just want health care, and it was like the sad you know: depressed meme, meme guy and then Democrats offering up critical race theory. They think that by having a diverse military industrial, complex progressives will just fallen line, but perhaps

This is why we see censorship affecting the Anti war left, as well as conservatives, those who push back on this psychotic orthodoxy and dogmatic like behavior from the democratic establishment that, for some reason- has always pushed for segregation. Maybe there was a brief fleeting moment for a couple of I don't know- maybe I was too young, but they were the. There were the party of segregation then, and today they are the party of segregation so I will absolutely be calling them out, because these are the ones who freak me out. Let me show you this meme image. There is a black man who says this is an historic moment people of color finally have a space safe from white, privileged discrimination and theirs, man putting up assign who says actually this sign has been in the past he spent at the university for decades it's a sign where there is an ed scratched off of a certain word, and it says people of color, dormitory and they're pointing out the segregation was then and it is being brought back now.

Under a very similar name? It's the same thing and I think it's fairly obvious. If you pay attention and your critical of this, the problem, I suppose it there are many people who not paying attention. So while it may be obvious, when you see them doing it, if you're a tribal who goes along with this, if you're, a dogmatist who believes in an edit Arianism or your democratic state, you're a democratic, establish politician, you're, probably in favor of this, because it gives you our you can cancel those who disagree with you policy wise. You can get your politician elected. You can accuse tromp of being racist, and I ll give you an example. Take a look at this from law not come executive order forcing cancellation of more diversity. Events do Doj groups say the dangerous the quantity of suspending more than just trainings have already begun to play out. Groups for diverse staff at just a department have scrapped more events,

our concerns. They would violate trumps recent executive order, prohibiting diversity and inclusion, training you see how serious it is to call it diversity, but then actually advent for students to be separated based on race. Is it diversity when we have different ideas and where people of different racial or ethnic backgrounds and identities isn't it diversity when we are altogether working together at what point? Did diversity come to mean racial segregation? It semantics its double speak straight at a nineteen eighty four, they argue that segregation is diversity there doing it and it's happening right, None of us, it's only gotten worse, maybe have hurt me talk about a lot of this stuff for some time, maybe this is just an update for you, because now we're seeing just how bad it's gotten and I think it's going to continue to get bad and I think those of us who believe even true classical or social liberalism where the inn

Virtual is protected, we're losing. Maybe we're not completely losing maybe denies it in the night is always darkest before the dawn and we're really seeing is that the more this kind of behaviour happens, the more regular following the tune out and these Petitions well get woke and go broke. How many people actually want this? The scary thing to me is that it's likely there are, you know what I'm gonna say it. They try to argue that there are crypto, fascist or crypto white Nationalists, this guy Clayburn Griffin, for instance, on Twitter has to be. He has made one of the most overtly white supremacist things. I've ever seen, but I shouldn't call it most of her. I should say it's subversive We knew that someone in an interracial relationship may secretly be racist. It's insane and absolutely is insane. Dilber is married to a beautiful. What they look like a very loving relationship, and this woman slammed clay born telling him to. Basically,

shove off an absolutely billboards. An epoch and amazing comedian he's a rat dude, and I don't care about the rate of him or his wife. I think he just as a good job, I'm glad he calls out the stuff when he does he's not per. But he tries to play it safe a little bit sometimes, and I think his wife's seems like a very lovely, an intelligent person. So so what? Why would the skies? this and how many more people exist like him, who believe these things and our secret pushing this while claiming to be on the left. It reminds me of the truth about the abusive male feminist they claimed. What women, but there actually just trying to use feminism as he s a you, know, foot in the door to get inside spaces with these women and then abuse them here today, We now have Lindsey Gram decrying what he calls reparations in the covered relief bill hidden inside a president

providing one point. Nine trillion corner virus relief bill as a special programme that will dole out race based cash to black farmers, says Jus, appealingly, grim quote, and this bill, if you're a farmer or loan will be forgiven up to one hundred and twenty percent, if you're African American, some other minority, but if you're a white person, no forgiveness, why do that? Why tell a poor white person You are not entitled to being helped. Why should our taxes be segregated? We fought long and hard in this country to end the racism and it is not the Republicans bringing back as much as I am no fan of Linsey grim. I can give him respect for calling out race based programmes that give money to people based on race. This should be outright illegal, which take a look at Joe Biden said and will bring together the? U S, department, education, suspended, a decision that found racial affinity.

Discriminated against students and staff, to put it mildly,. It is now ok to discriminate against people based on At these schools- and I am no fan- and I completely disagree with it- forest Apple's Linsey Groundless slammed. The national black Farmers Association calls for grand to apologize of a racist comments. If you criticise Is the government giving up money based on race, they'll? Call you racist here we are. Where does this all lead us at a time when we are hyper polarized worse than we ve ever been at a time when it seems like we have no unifying culture. Grammy's ratings are down, I'm user down, Superbowl ratings are down. None of us are. The same programmes, it were. Our culture is fracturing at a time when culture Stagnation is on the rise. Movies are repetitive redundant repeats adaptation. We also have an effort by the left and Democrats to separate people based on race

This may be the most divisive time in american history. We don't agree on policy, we dunk. We as politicians, we don't agree on social issues, and then being separated on a bunch of different issues. Tv shows. We watch the comment. There's we listen to our income levels where we live, who we vote for and now apparently race. So what do you think's going to happen? You not divide and conquer means. Here we go. Is there a solution to the division that I believe it eventually result in conquering. I don't think so. I could go to the Woke left us and Argue? I think what they're doing is wrong and noticed. Tell me I'm wrong. They'll scream, you know, takes one, no one, nothing or get resolved, you gotta, go look at twitter and you know twitter and you many of these once Anti S, J, W types that were critical of all the stuff have now become anti anti establishment

while they may not be supporting overt woken us there, certainly critical of those who are challenging the status quo and challenging critical race theory, and I find that outright strange. The progressive left many the populists once you dont support? This will still line up behind it to go after trot supporters. Well, fine consent, or what you consider a threat. What you want to consider a threat, but here in the- and what will happen as we will be completely divided, nor be conquered, or at the very least we just collapse. Now we can see rival nations start to take over and become a superpower. That is table zation may very well lead to international conflict and war. So I don't know I don't know if that will happen. I can't see the future I can only tell you that I I argued this is a problem is becoming worse. It will only it will likely only get worse seeing Joe Biden is rescinding complex. Cheetah border uncritical race theory, allowing He's raced based set segregation to continue

and why should I assume the Democrats would do anything else? Dividing this nation will make it easier for Democrats and corrupt politicians, Republicans included to maintain power. So here we go, but in the end, with no unified front For America, no unified community or culture or mission- and we just get crushed and that's why I think we're headed Oliver there. Next I coming up tonight at Youtube outcomes lashed him cast, I r l it's alive show we take your comments. We read I'm so come hang out at eight p m and we will see you all then.