Today is March twenty third, twenty twenty one and our first story, the? U S has joined the European Union issuing sanctions against China for their abuses, Iger Muslims, Muslims in concentration camps. This is the right move but China has responded by issuing sanctions of their own. There are fears that escalating sanctions could result in half. Conflict are next story Mexican, cartels are taking advantage of the ongoing border crisis and sparking big business smuggling humans and engaging in human trafficking. Kamala Harris is being criticized for laughing at the crisis when asked. If she would visit and our last story advocates of gun control Democrats are exploiting the latest crisis to push for law. But it seems like they just don't quite understand what these guns are, how they work and what their actually calling for. Let's break down some of these gun control claims,

before we get started. If you like the show, please leave a positive review, give us five stars and share it with your friends. Sharing the most important thing you can do, because apparently it really helps, grew the show, show inform people that help the show exists. Now, let's get into that first story: in what I can only hope is the right move, the binding administration has joined the EU in sanctioning China over their mistreatment of Uighur Muslims, for those aren't familiar China, China's operating concentration camps for a religious minority, and it's shocking and disgusting time. We saw some action now in the past. I've said I think sanctions may be the right move, I'm not a profit and that a psychic I just hope this makes sense and I will say it out right. The culture WAR is damaging to: U S interests, the fights that we have overcome

go race theory and social justice issues are important for a variety of reasons, but I fear there tearing this country apart and we must do everything we can to give credit where credit is due when things happen that are beneficial to all of us here in United States and the world the longest time China. Has gotten away with the mistreatment of the bigger Muslims, with the mistreatment of those Hong Kong, and there are fears they will try to invade and sees Taiwan. There are fears. The bite administration will not be strong enough to stop. It recently saw peace talks, breakdown, chinese officials went on a fifteen minute rant in insulting the S claiming that we here have serious human rights abuses and our interests are being undermined by the culture war in many different ways from messaging around the world. Putting us in a weak position, to dividing us at a time when we are facing quite possibly the biggest threat we have ever faced

a rising and despotic authoritarian chinese Communist party now We are also seeing a movement to stop hate against Asians So, where things get interesting and it seems that China, absolutely seeks to exploit culture, war tensions and an effort to undermine american interests. We have many people, many articles being written, claiming that credit size in the Chinese Communist Party over their actions pertaining to the abuse of roads. Minorities, as well as their handling of covert, is sign, a phobia that contributes to hate and violence. Now, my friends, I certainly think it is wrong, but we seeing with these hate crimes against the asian community, then I'll, see you I'm glad to see. Finally, people on the left recognizing that agents, are in fact a minority as well, but in the end it is still a divisive issue and it is an excuse to I am criticising the Chinese Communist Party in any way causes this kind of hate or violence to these minorities, not look

I will be fair. There are some crazy people. There always are in their fringe groups that absolutely equate a family running. Small restaurant as part of the Chinese Communist Party is a big difference. We're not here to criticise the people in China or Asians in general I action the Asian we're here to criticise the affair. Authoritarian DES spits, who are pressing religious minorities operating concentration, camp, a concentration camps and threatening the interests of the world and the? U S is it's not Just what China is doing with these? These human rights uses that are cause for concern China has launched the belt and wrote initiative, a massive infrastructure project which is going to give them serious influence over many other countries and risk the? U S position around the world is challenging questions. Do you support us in imperialism or whatever you want to call it. No, no! No, not a genius have access as to classified information and am very critical of war, but I do know

then, if America doesn't remains strong and unified, and we do and breaking apart for whatever reason, then nothing will stop China, authoritarianism and that may be the path were on and scary which why I want to say, I believe, Biden said, Minister, deserve credit from imposing on on China so far, I hope it's the right move so long as there is pro active action being taken to stop the abuse of the bigger Muslims, then I will absolutely give credit to Joe Biden Administration, though I am still cautious that he may not be. But the job and I dont know if commonly Harris or anyone else in administration is going to do the right thing as it pertains to these human rights abuses. Let's get serious today read the news about what's happening with these sanctions and exactly with them, administration is doing before we get started head over to TIM, cast dot com to become a member and help support. My as show as well as the IRL podcast in podcast event, the event we get purged or silenced or smeared or whatever. We need your support.

For now. Ratings are down across the board. Everybody is hurting and we're working overtime to make sure that we can make something meaningful for all of you. So good TIM Casta com you'll get access to exclusive members, only posts which did a segment of the day with prissy mayor the comedian about aliens because trumps director of national. Until said yeah there's some pretty crazy evidence out there and we have Kerch. Lictor inject me the as well as came Iverson. We ve had some progressive mind you in some really interesting conversations, support the show right, TIM cast outcome and don't forget to like share subscribe, hit that notification Bell and let's ride, some pretty serious and sobering news. Npr reports joint EU and sanctions against China over treatment of weaker Muslims? China and the European Union Trade sanctions against each other's officials Monday and the? U S, joined the in Canada. In parallel, I'll two measures by the European Union to protest human rights. Populations and abuses in the Western she

changing our region. The EU imposed travel and economic risk. Sanctions on for of chinese officials in response to the imprisonment of hundreds of weaker Muslims. My understanding is that it's actually in the millions or million plus some those the EU sanctions was Chan. Meanwhile, the director of the changing public security bureau, because of the treatment of workers and changing the sanctions, are the first, The EU has imposed since nineteen. Eighty nine in protest of China's treatment of the team, men square demonstrators in Beijing in response, China has its own sanctions against ten european individuals and for entities quote this move based on nothing but lie Eyes and disinformation disregards and distorts facts grossly, interferes in China's internal affairs flagrantly breaches international law and basic norms governing international relations and severe the undermines China Eu Relations, a foreign ministry spokespersons

The EU move European Parliament members Reinhard, but about a coffer and Michael Dollar, Raphael Gluckman Ill Han check and Marion Lexman were included in China, sanctions the? U S joined the EU and other allies. In a statement secretary of state Anthony blink. In said, I'm sorry Antony, I always do that Anthony. In said, the United States is committed to playing a strong leadership role in global efforts to combat serious human rights abuses through the global magnet ski sanctions, program and similar efforts. The EU. And us, along with Australia, New Zealand in Canada released a joint statement saying we will can. And you to stand together to shine a spotlight on China's human rights violations, we see united and call for justice for those suffering in changing the state and Treasury Department released events, announcing financial terms that send a strong

signal to those who violate or abuse international human rights, and we will take further actions in coordination with, like minded partners, quote We will continue to stand with our allies around the world in calling for an immediate end to the pr sees crimes and for justice for the many victims, blinkin sadness, statement. Jeanette Mohammed is an internet here with your now. We also have this more specific the way from CNBC and I'm going to say it again. Listen I dont, like Joe Biden, don't like as a ministration. I don't like the corporate establishment Democrats, but I will tell you this: when presented with a conflict, between the: U S, interests and foreign adversaries. I set aside. My political concerns with Joe Biden, evident Crafts, as well as with Republicans and I will We must stand united against a growing threat. That is The Chinese Communist Party, I'm more

the binding administration is not up to the task and I'm worried that this may be just words and not legitimate action. That being said, there is at least the words there is at least the action when Donald Trump, asked the Demilitarize zone into North Korea without security. Many criticise them saying he wasn't anything other than pandering to dictators. I'm sorry! I think he deserves credit for that, because it make they could assist. Matched him up right there, no security in North Korea. It was a tremendous act of good faith and I respect Trump for doing it. Joe Biden right now: administration, sanctioning, chinese officials, citing human rights abuses against Wiggers, I dont know if it will be effective. I dont know if it will backfire. I just know I respect and appreciate action being taken by the US to to go after these human rights abuses. I think it's fair to

point out the media's absolutely trying to frame Missus O Joe Biden started the fight. Now, I'm not confident Joe Biden started that he is willing to carry on this fight. I know that he's taking actions now which we must give credit for. We have two because, in the event that we actually do break apart and the events in the event, the circumstance that Joe, but an actually is, behold into china- we're in serious trouble. So all I can really do is cross my fingers and say please. I hope they can do this. I hope they can pull this off because I'll put up resent you with my mice, my worrying vision of the future Joe Biden may be compromised Tony Bobby Linsky, a confidant of the Biden family, said that the bite and family is com. Remind- and we know about Joe bringing his on air force. To that worries me, we can see certain deferential behind from from certain individuals, the the transition transition team to China It means we will end up in a future where Chinese

communist culture, the authoritarianism of their party becomes dominant and spreads to the rest of the world There are many people I believe that are ultra wealthy, that feel as though the US has already lost that battle or that something called Thucidites trap predicts serious war which must be averted in which Is they defer to China? I dont want to live in a world that lives under the boot of the Chinese Communist Party. There authoritarian their despotic and they welded p those doors shut and barricaded them in their homes during Covet they lie. To us and the World Health Organization about what was going on with Covin, while in acting their citizens abroad to buy p p gear. We have with few choices and they're, not good ones. It's not an easy choice. To make the? U S, Has tremendous power with military bases around the world. With this american interests persist, but at least in United States for

of the problems and all the authoritarianism. There is still some accountability. China doesn't have that when you criticised police or politicians. They essentially kidnap you and torture you, if you're this minority they put you in camps. If you want your freedom of speech and say Hong Kong, they will oppress you uninstall, a puppet government that is the terrifying future. That is Chinese Communist Party influence, which means as they expand the a belt and road initiative. We are, a serious disadvantage? My fingers crossed unfairly pessimistic CNBC reports. The Biden administration on Monday sanction to chinese officials, the the roles in serious human rights abuses against ethnic minorities and changing Beijing as previously rejected? U S charges but it has committed genocide against the Wiggers muslim population indigenous to the changing weaker autonomous region in Northwest China. China, is also said that allegations of its use of detention camps are groundless.

Instead uses facilities, provide vocational training to up stamp out islamist extremism and separatism, I understand those claims I understand those statements, but we ve seen the photos. We ve seen the videos and we we ve heard from the witnesses and United States. We respect, has a culture, your right to practice their religion. Now I understand we have clashes over ideology and we have internal medical bickering its escalating to a very serious culture war which undermines our interests abroad? And that to me, is the most worrying thing. I don't agree with a critical race theorists I don't agree with many of the left on policy, but I think if, if we don't come together and recognise the greater external threat, we're in serious trouble, I get it. We have internal threats, are our political fights they go on seeming,

forever, but we have to be able to overcome this and remain a unified, United States. Otherwise China will sweep across the globe and they already are Fox news reports. China, infrastructure plan could leave? U S. Grossly disadvantage, acts Navy leader says, as report warns of risks. China's belt, and road initiative poses challenge to: U S. Interests Council on foreign relations warns I'm not a big fan of the CFR either, but I got to tell you man: we are between a rock and a hard place authoritarian interests here in the: U S would strip of our rights and Chinese interests, talk about a rock and a hard place, my friends chinese communist interest to clarify foxes. Ports. China's massive international infrastructure initiative, known as the belt and road initiative, poses a cigar the challenge to U S: economic, political, climate change and secured interests. A new report released Tuesday by the count on foreign relations warrants a retired

leader involved involved. The airport told Fox NEWS that have left unchecked. The initiative could leave the US gross lead, disadvantage, the council on foreign relations. Independent task force chaired by former chief of Paypal Operations, Admiral Gary Rufford and former Obama treasure secretary, Jacob Blue, released the report, Tuesday warning of the implications of China's Belt and road initiative for the. U s rough, had in it and problem problem. Browsing it right in an exclusive interview with Fox NEWS, said: quote: it, is important that America understands just how extensive bri is about the road initiative and how China's been it has been able to expand globally and penetrate into what he considered some of the key factors of what will determine national power in America's role in the world, the cost of inaction is that the United States will find that it will be done dealing with countries that fundamentally are based on chinese infrastructure. Chinese. Information systems and with that a significant amount of Chinese,

influence in many parts of the world. Rough had told Fox the. U S will find itself grossly disadvantaged. If that is allowed to happen, chinese president she's Ping first announced China's belt and road initiative, and twenty thirteen, a planned mould DE trillion dollar infrastructure programme that is intended to link China with more than one hundred countries through railroad shipping and energy projects. The awry seeks to recreate the silk road, an old network of trading routes between the EAST and West, by investing large sums of money into other countries to build such infrastructure Jack's. Already, China's port massive investments into other countries. As part of the initiative proponents say the project will strengthen ties between Beijing and emerging markets, while lifting developing nations out of poverty, however, critics of the hour, I say it is part of China's desire to achieve trade dominance and control in order to compete with United States Rough had said, China has been able to make inroads in key regions

and in key countries, warning that many argue s allies when the most significant moves, China made in its Bri according according Rufford, was in penetrating digital infrastructure in countries around the world. To me, that infrastructure is how we are going to live here, we're going to operate and how information will be garnered and used explained and China has done an incredible job in making that penetration Rufford said the United States needs to become more active in participating in the standard setting bodies as it applies to digital technology. We walked away from that rough had said, this report shows the reads and depth of the belt and road initiative and the need for United States to look at it and say: what are we going to do about it? He added It is spreading chinese influence in ways the. U S had opportunities in the past that we didn't take advantage of

China's had some momentum on this, particularly when you get into the digital space. They have infrastructure already in place and we need to figure out what the strategy should be to wean countries off of that and provide more responsible, more open and more transparent options that allow them to move now the previous administration under Donald Trump, I believed was- doing? A decent job I say decent because there were many things I thought they were doing. That was good. However, could it be perfect? I dont know where their still problems? Yes, but under Donald Trump he made China frightened centre. You see the Democrats were obsessed with Russia. Russia was their big villain. Michael Flynn was adamant that China was the actual threat before Trump they just kept talking about. Russia probably because they wanted to build the cutter turkey pipeline through Syria and Syria's allied with Russia creating problems for the. U S, Donald Trump sought to bolster. U S, manufacturing and strengthen us from within his power.

Mt many of our medicines and our goods are manufactured in China. If China shut off manufacturing, we would be crippled. Maybe horrifying antibiotics aren't even being made here. Vitamin c, not me here. We would be helpless if China decided one day to shut off the manufacturing. Now we do have some of our manufacturing in Mexico, but point We need to shore up our critical infrastructure, because China is adamant. They are hell bent, on gaining dominance around the world. I don't blame them. I don't blame blame any group of people for vying vying for power. And seeking to gain power? But if we believe Our values are better and that human rights free speech and all of these these these values that we hold, must be and be paramount. Then we need to make sure we do not allow China to gain that dominance on Fourchan,

For us, it seems like it is inevitable. The prediction say that now because of covered by twenty twenty eight China will overtake the? U s most. Have you not a big fan of STAR Trek, namely the MAC, the next generation? I watch that show with hope that we get to this future It is a classically liberal future. For the most part, technology changes things, but they believe in free speech. They believe in the right to exist. They don't believe Even the authoritarianism of Chinese Communist Party, if they do end up overtaking us in their influence, becomes law around the world and we're not going to have that beautiful future where we of all the stars. We're gonna have an authoritarian Borg like future we're all called then a machine and we basically just suffer under the boat of the collective. That to me is terrifying. That's why, as much as I am not a fan of Biden than I don't trust him, I'm hoping this is the right path for at least to some degree

and we have to remain vigilant. It's tough and oh, isn't it. We were heavily critical of the Democrats and bite and because of their deference to and now we can only hope we can only hope, they're doing the right thing keeping in mind. We have to be active in that fight. And we have to make sure we focus on stories like this. There are lots of stores I gotta talked about. Today is a lot of issues presented the culture war, hopeful this is something that matters more to you and your willing to sharing at the word out about. We don't want the? U S to fall apart. We absent we do not and it seems sometimes gets going that direction with all the articles coming talk about civil war with even me talking about these articles, it's scary, many people say peaceful divorce. I fear, if peaceful force even happened. That's what some people advocate for China just takes over

and then how long until our trade and our need for four key materials is restricted because we don't abide by their influence, their laws were already getting to that were already moving in that direction, and that to me is horrifying. Fox goes on to say: Russia told Fox NEWS about the Trump administration. Toughened up some policies be all right is much broader than just being on trade quote. We need to put in place policies that address the security risk and economic advantage or disadvantage to the United States of China moving faster and more completely in some of the spaces at they ve moved into profits. Adding. There needs to be a broader, more strategic public, private partnership approach. As for the binding ministrations approach to China, rough had said, the night is young. I think You have some experienced hands in the Bud administration, particularly as it applies is to Asia and China. But the real question is what the emphasis on domestic issues covered employment, the discord that exists in the country today. Will there be it

energy and focus on putting together a coherent strategy to tie the many threads together. Rough had added that it's it's early in the Biden administration, but underscored the very good people in the administration that understand China. The implications of what we discuss in the report. Bill. More liberal said we were a silly people because of the culture war and we need to focus on China. Tucker Karlsson said effectively the same thing. The problem as in the mainstream establishment, left we're not getting that rhetoric. I understand Mars is essentially a mainstream liberal, but he's not talking to them majority of mainstream liberals, I mean to show think it's on a million municipal episode, which is great now, but bill more, is he's either he's dying breed. To put it simply, a liberal who d Finally, the Republicans in Tromp but believes in free speech is worried about the expansion of authoritarian chinese communists

from the mainstream left we're getting stories like this from the Washington Post by bipartisan. And political rhetoric about Asia leads to anti asian violence. Here, sign a phobia today, is fuelling a wave of domestic hatred. Ok, I understand that, but that's fringe they're calling out democrat and Republican Alike concerned about China concerns about China to me that strange and they're, using social justice to push As they say, the asian american sense of belonging was already fragile. Before a white gunman took action and committed atrocities in Atlanta, they gonna say he told the police race wasn't his motive, but it's too soon. The blame Trump for what's happening, they say the nineteen eighties officials from both parties cast Japan as the economic enemy. Now it's China, one of the few issues about which Democrats and Republicans agree It's true that China is an extremely bad actor when it comes to espionage and human rights, but decades of official you, foreign policy and rhetoric from the Pandit class have had a unique affect an Asian Americans when the government frets

russian hacking election interference, there's little consequence for Americans of russian heritage. When officials press fear over China or other asian countries. American immediately turned to a time when Rachel script, that questions of loyalty, elite and then belonging of twenty May. Asian Americans most are a skilled distinguishing between people of different asian or our ancestors and the result is that whenever China's attacked so or Asian Americans as a whole. I like this because I'm not here to play this culture Morgan, I get it fine don't want anyone attacked, and I saw this video of these weirdo fringe. Far left. You know, paramilitary guys or whatever, and they are protesting. What about chinese restaurant yeah? That's knots! We should criticise that. I'm scared the culture wars tearing apart and is being weapon ized by China in order to actually undermine our interest and allow them to gain strength, and its

coming from our media institutions. Now, look we see from it PR and CNBC Joe Biden sanctioning China, but we see from the Washington Post and other you know, outlets that they're just there they're using that they're using the code you're warfare power it something that we saw James Lindsey mentioned on the TIM cast iron podcast when he said its political warfare and that there was Period, where chinese social media accounts would complain about, what's called bite swap that means white left. They were mocking us for this social justice. Push for one day. All of a sudden they just agreed with it is account, stop saying it why? Because they realized it, helped them the instability in the? U S and the culture war was bad for us. In this article from China and all news Asia. They say social media worsens growing in He China sentiments in Southeast Asia

social media movements, such as the milk alliance, are tapping into discontent, discontent on the decline of democracy and fears about the rise of China is part of this heat mix is: is Eas Yusof Ishaq Institute visiting Fellow here's a sign? want democracy, not dictatorship and others talking about Singapore, but I highlight this because people in social media are starting to talk about what's happening in China and how what they're doing is bad. That's a good thing, that's the kind of sentiment that we need and then, if it results in sanctions or some kind of action against the Chinese Communist Party, that's what we need, but my fear is they're going to use. Who's the culture war to undermine these very important conversations criticising China. The allay times reports,

anti chinese insults. Disrupt, stop asian hate protest authorities investigate we agree. We don't want violence against any anyone. We dont want war, we don't violence against the Chinese Communist Party. I'm sure some do, I suppose, but the goal is to end the fighting and bring about peace. The problem is war is not so simple. I try to explain the explain these comments are that these these these circumstances to people and I'll give you one example imagine you're in the middle of the woods. The middle of nowhere, absolute middle of nowhere, you're lost, you have limited supplies, you don't know where you are and all of a sudden you know so you're you're carrying your weapon. You ve got some food in some water, but you're running out You see off in the distance and other personal looks just like you, their armed. They have got water, they ve got food. What do you do this? the hypothetical ask a lot of people to question what their immediate reaction would be to be,

ass, the middle of nowhere with limited supplies, no food around seeing someone carrying similar supplies. Many people say that they would work together with an individual to survive. Smart move it surely work, but sometimes not so simple. What if this individual has A little bit of food- and you know if you don't get it you're in trouble or the person has no food. What do you see? A person was armed and they don't have food. Can you trust that they're going to be peace? One work with you? What, if they use their weapon to take from you, your food and water, because they would other survive than die. What, if they're starving the issue with war? When it comes to China, they have people to feed, they have a system to me, pain. They have an ideology that they support. The? U S, a similar, we have our System our ideology and our people, we need to know that enough resources to support our people to keep things stable and then eventually

both sides look at each other and say we won't agree. There is no unity. We completely disagree with what you're doing and we need what you ve got. And then you get war, there are many people would say the: U S should just stop. There. We should essentially just roll over and accept our fate. There many sits. Who would say no, we must fight to survive in the end, I think most life on this planet will fight to survive Now we're not dying were starving, in fact were eating way too much. We have more luxury than ever, but how do we maintain the system? We maintain just enough economic growth to keep american satisfying. How do we prevent instability? It's not easy China will exploit whatever they can putting us at a disadvantage, because we actually have some freedoms in this country. The media, for instance, can pour on whatever they want for the most part. There are national. Instances where there are restrictions in place. Typically, that's with agreement from the news outlets because they don't want to cause the US harm. But China is authoritarian.

They can shut down conversations, force conversations and do whatever they want and nobody stops them because well they have the boot on the neck of their citizenry. Unfortunately, while they major disadvantage to the chinese people having to live this way. Some major advantage to the Chinese, From it for us here in the: U S have things things little bit better things: I've been kind of bad weather pandemic. We have in fighting with the culture war, but we have the freedom to speak, to criticise our political leaders and try to improve that system. We can only hope that our ability to criticize the government results, not in destruction and division, but in a refining of that system and improvement. I'm not convinced that'll be the case, because China knows they can exploit this weakness because as much as it's a potential strength, there's a weakness in propaganda, narratives and manipulation can undermine every we are doing to protect ourselves in the end, I do think we are headed towards a one world government of sorts, not because it's a good thing, and not because we wanted

happened, but because it seemingly inevitable due to communications and be an due to a lack of interest in the conflict. However, american interests thought having these trade agreements with China would result in them becoming more like us in the inverse is true what happens then? When both sides say I will not back down, and I will not leave the way you want me to war and that's effectively. Acidities trap, which says when any rising economic power is about to surpass the dominant Power war breaks out in. Twelve of sixteen historical instances in the past five hundred years, it has happened, a war when the USA, China could theoretically wipe out this planet. We have nuclear weapons now and according to stress how generational theory they Every war will be fought with the most devastating weapons available, which means if we you enter war, it will likely be nuclear war and it will be bad for everyone. So what do we do? I don't know the sanctions may be

bad move. The sanctions may ultimately result in an escalation of conflict and a conversation with such far. Aunt em guest, I rollin she said, is none of our business. What they do we, not the world police. We should not go to China, which not be trying to stop this. You know that the human rights abuse because their country, the problem problem, is hung isn't Taiwan? Isn't they claim it? Is the South China he isn't they claim it is. What do we do? We sit back and just take more and more, we watch the atrocities, if we sanction it could lead to war sooner. Maybe if we do nothing, war may be inevitable. Think about what was most guys, I'm never Chamberlain peace in our time. If we just appease Germany, it will all end. And it never did until we made it end. So what do we do? I don't know. I hope Move from the Bite administration is the right move. I do not want to a divisive political segment on culture, war issues

I want to say that so long as the binding administration is actually doing good things to curtail the abuses in China and get these atrocities under control and bring about a better future, they will have my respect. Criticise them where I need to, particularly with the border crisis, because that's been a disaster for now I don't know Let me know what you think in the comments below I'll leave it there segments Not tonight, at eight p m over at Youtube COM slashed him cast iron. Well, thank sprang up and I will see you all them. Yesterday on my main channel, which is youtube dot com slashed him gas? It is a different channel from this one. I covered a stir, worry about CNN being accused of running a story about a staged, Coyote smuggling operation, basically, smuggling illegal immigrants across the border? accusation was that the smuggler was wearing like a boy a clause on fatigues and it just looked way.

Two on the nose have gives the advocacy groups say: The smugglers. Don't actually do this to try and blend in so they did not believe it was real. Now I certainly would believe Cnn would stage something like this or the very least they knew it was staged. Decided to run the store anyway, because you know who cares about the facts right CNN, but in the end, I'll, just what I concluded was the simplest solution. Is they just filmed an illegal border crossing? The question was: why is it that these people wearing these masks and fatigues? Why is so obvious. I gotta tell you it's a simple solution. It really is. There is a boom right now because of Joe Biden failure because it lacks a days ago attitude we get from the Bite administration because their attempts to appease the woke lie. There are many new smugglers getting into the business. Now you guys ever watch breaking

I've only seen a little bit of it, but I remember there's that scene seem right frozen familiar with that show its where the guy he's a teacher is a science teacher they get cancer and then he s cell drugs to pay off his medical bills of gets anyway. He wants to like do not deal like all drugs and he meets these. People out in the middle of the desert and like what are we doing here like why? Don't we just met the mall or something? The point was this guy Heisenberg, you know the main character. He learned about this stuff from movies does not real like. If you want to do a deal, you gotta go in the middle of the desert, which is honestly like more obvious he's weird com, I'm pulling up the middle of nowhere. Someone could see him driving out be like what are they doing as opposed to being in them. On handing someone a package? That's the point. Could it be that this incident we saw with the guy wearing the balaclava, is just Some guy was like damn now

my chance to make some cash because Joe Biden ain't doing nothing about this. Things are getting worse worse than they ever been. So now you get a bunch of guys warlike. I could do that job, not not knowing anything about it puts scheme ask and fatigue is like okay. This is what I'm supposed to do. I guess as giving up masks why it might not look normal, but it could just be new inexperienced smugglers, here's the story, exclusive people, are the new dope. Mexican cartels are seizing on lax border border policies to run multi million dollar human trafficking scheme and are using families as decoys to smuggle single adults and drugs from elsewhere. Can it really be that simple, my friends. See and ended need to stage it? They need the only shop with a camera because

Biden has done such a terrible job in these first few months and come that it's salting in cartels and new smugglers rushing now I will say this. I actually think the cartels are particularly savvy Andy fish and- and I gotta tell you man, you better respect the cartels, I'm not saying at the like what they do, but you respect them in that these people don't play games. I don't think the people who are like you see in this view of the Gatt. The scheme asked That'S- probably some dude who's new to this and he's like. Is this? What I do? The cartels got well oiled machines. They know what's up, they control these tears, Tories, and they shut down anyone who dare oppose them. Even the mexican government that something that even tromp was calling out powerful organisations and they found two big been two new things that have emerged. Sir,

we ve started legalizing recreational marijuana crossed the? U S more and more states are decriminalizing is the appropriate way to say it in response, the cartels needed to find something else. That's worth money, and surprisingly, there were two big things. The first was of a cargoes, no joke avocados man legit. I went down to Mexico just over a year ago, like a year and a half about this point or like a year and five months. And I was talking to the locals and they were like? Oh yeah, yeah man, the cartels figured out, avocados are big business and I was kind of laughing I'm like. Doesn't that mean they're kind of going like legit and they're like yeah, but they're, still the cartels. You know if they're making more money and avocado it's not about drugs, it's about just selling a product. The next big thing, though, people now's the chance. You got his caravans coming from Guatemala, you ve got people come from Honduras

they're making their way through and yet the? U S, government sent none of that under Trump. Now that Joe Biden stepped in and the dude is just befuddled bewildered and falling downstairs, a lot of people are like this. Is our chance. Don't take my word for it. Let me give you the proof news. Busters runs. This story quote letting my hopes up. Illegal immigrant tells ABC Nbc Bite and is why they're here they report, it was bad news bears for the Biden administration on Sunday as the ABC, is this week and embassies Sunday today had to reluctantly admit but the crisis on the southern border was happening because of their policies, but it wasn't some great moral epiphany that led the liberal need to finally tell the truth. It was the fact it Lee immigrants themselves were saying they were crossing because President Biden told them the border was open, so I'm just pause or second poor we'd more this, the loss of life, the crew,

does the cartels the smugglers are telling you to your face. This is Joe Biden. Is Joe Biden we knew that Joe Biden was going to be weak on a lot of these issues. We knew that during the campaign the Democrats were saying things like no deportations and a path of citizenship. That's the kind of rhetoric that even Jake Tapper was roasting. Jen sake for at least that's my understanding of it like isn't this encouraging people listen

I want all these people have a good life each and every one of them deserves a good life, but you don't give them a good life by telling them to cross over the river where they drown or to wander through the desert or took to be fugitives from a law. That's insane! You need to tell them to come here the proper weight. It's not that easy. It's most frustrating thing at you of migrants who come from these countries who do everything right and they come into the United States and they flourish and then for some reason you have advocacy groups and Democrats being like. Let everybody run through the border. Why So they can be second class citizens hiding from cops getting paid over the table. That's not a good life, maybe it's better than where they came from their desperate, but I do not think that is appropriate. That's why the remain in Mexico policy made a lot of sense because it wasn't girls like yeah, we're gonna process your claims, but you ve gotta, wait here now. Mexico wasn't too thrilled about it, took us out

At most muster says with NBC spending a last week refusing to call it was having the border crisis in any way. The network tried to make up for lost time by throwing the term at seemingly every opportunity and corresponding dash of burns was the was was, was the Rio Grande Valley, where she? What was at the Rio Grande Valley, where she wind about politicians playing the border blame game burn, spoke with one family via translator. Who explained but they entered the. U S illegally because they wanted to take advantage of the opportunities Biden was giving them burns. Some say the new president gave them hope for life in America. Why did you decide to come now the illegal immigrants as to take advantage of the opportunity The president has given to the people who come from Central America to come with their family, it was the same story in ABC when, when co host Martha with spoke with a father from Brazil to fled to the of his family family, he told her that Biden was getting his hopes up. It it says, did: did you come here?

cause. Joe Biden was elected president and the immigrant, the illegal immigrants, as basically, basically the main thing was the violence in my country, and the second thing I think, was Joe Biden. You know he's like letting up my hope. You know what I mean Definitely when she asked him about trying to under America legally under former president Trump, he said he wouldn't dare tripe. Definitely not. Definitely we had the chance, you know, but this in violence. It's going on today was there last year we used to watch the news, and we definitely wouldn't do this, but right continued to play defence for the Biden administration when Speaking with Republican Arizona, Governor Doug Doozy, flew alongside the governor, as he took an aerial tour of the border to citizens for himself. He said Joe Biden is to blame. She shrugged and through her hands, when suggested Biden, did all he could well told migrants not to combat an interview. The network last week, luckily do see made her look. Foolish read, it said you are. President Biden say here that I dont come. What more can we do? Deuces says? Well, he certainly can communicate more often more clear.

And he should be talking to mexican President Andre Manual Lopez. Oberdoffer he's got a big microphone. He needs to use it appropriately. But the Bite administration has turned back the majority of those crossing into the. U S many distraught after believing they would find refuge in America. She pouted. Meanwhile, the broadcasts networks worse still refusing to show how migrants had crossed over the border illegally earlier this month, while wearing shirts, and holding signs. That said Biden, please let us in and that's true. They were Wang. Shirts. That said Biden, please let us in. I am sick of these pathetic feckless politicians. Donald Trump for all his problems was the guy going, no, no uhuh! No, and they knew it look he's people come the border, their wearing shorts, hang Biden, please let us and because they are manipulating the the emotions of the Democrat voter base to take advantage of the system that results in detriment for every one I have personally see

this. When I was covering what was going on in Sweden, we need make sure that when migrants come in and although people Wang those shirts are placed properly so that they can find work, they are protected by the law. Their rights are guaranteed, but just having them waltz on in creates Surf class and I get it Bernie Sanders set it and twenty fifteen open borders is a Pope Brothers proposal. They want cheap, surf labour people that are scared: the law that won't fight for their rights and we'll get paid dirt wages it's how they circumvent workers rights. The things you accomplished of the past hundred years, but for some reason I see the left ever manipulated by their emotions unfortunately agree to things that hurt them. I love. I love when they're like since the Ronald Reagan, wage, a wealth, inequalities been skyrocketing alike, Alyosha. What what was wolves Republican Party doing back then? What was it that o o o o mass migration there

a party of serious immigration, now I'm in favour of immigration. I absolutely am because we need more workers and more workers means economic expansion. That is good for the United States and the people were coming near them. But will the jet believe in the american dream not like me? of these like young millennial types. I don't think it exists now these people comics. I know it exists, here's the issue, if they just I'm in randomly and the running of the desert. They get sick. These people could die, kids could die and they end up in communities laced with islands, they have no access to their rights. It is just a disaster when they come in properly, we know weakens set them up properly. We know where we can benefit the economy for everybody. There has to be a basic level of control swim, marketable. How does that the Democrats and left just don't seem to care about any of this? Now those really care about his. Don't don't arrests, these people, whenever it's like, do. Let me show

are they really feel calmly, whereas under Firefox laughing and saying not today, when our porter asked her? If she will visit the border just hours after release of photos showing the hell hole, conditions at Biden, migrant camps, oh biting his operating concentration camps and that's it, It was, he was saying about trot right Biden reopened them. So, bite and is now running concentration camps, look he's not, but where is the left on this one? Now there has been some criticism. Yossi has criticized Joe Biden for reopening whether these facilities, but the energy just ain't there look I'll give AOL. Respect for slamming the bite administration for reopening this facility, but where's the where's, the photo up Where's, the coming down and sang Joe Biden tear down this wall is just not there. Now here's the craziest thing about all this:

Comma Harris laughing. I despise this person she's laughing. There are people who are dying at the border. There are cartels smuggling people across. It is a crisis. It is a disaster. It is the worst crisis we ve seen yet and commonly Harris laughs in your face and in their faces it's funny to her. It's always funny this woman laughs inappropriately because she enjoys the suffering you think about what she did when she was in California. Keeping people pass their prison sentences to use as cheap labor to fight wildfires. She took these people and said you get a dollar an hour, whatever they pay and go fight, fires risk your lives for the state and she laughs every time,

You know it's funny. It's almost like how do how did we get a villain president, mocking and laughing and at the suffering of others really be observed that the daily mail reports commonly Harris was asked. If she had plans to visit. Use my school border on Monday, but appeared to laugh at the question posed by our reporter. Do you have any plans to visit? The border came a question while in the tarmac not today, she responded before laughing, but I have before, and I'm sure I will again was that sarcasm. Is she being sarcastic not today sure I'll go again or she's saying a few and f them. I don't care, that's what she's really saying, then the laugh from this administration as an all burned to the ground. Could you imagine you know Joe Biden struggles to get up the stairs? He falls down is saying like it's gonna be commonly Harris. Use can be made president soon we're gonna have

Budget supervillain president. Ok, I'm I'm somewhat kidding right, but think about this. The maniacal laughter at human suffer that's commonly Harris, and I think even the progressives recognise that women have a president sitting there and the remit. Madam president, twenty three children were killed. An air strike, a jungle. Well, you know have to do it again. I guess that's cobblers. She laughs all the time, one of the weirdest things I've ever seen was when she was asked about Joe Biden being a racist, and she just burst out laughing laughing at you laughing in your face laughing in my face laughing in the face of the progressives, who criticise Joe Biden over the racism, Kamel Harris laughs in our faces. Why? Because she knows she got a bunch of dumb liberals who will just vote for her by no matter what, because I hate trump- and you know what,

Brussels, while she said they're laughing in your face as people are questioning Joe Biden has a racist she's. Sitting there laughing in your face. You vote for anyway. Now she's laughing in the faces of the families that are suffering it's disgusting We knew this is who she was, and this is what the administration is. The worst crisis we ve being probably in a generation or more maybe the worst border crisis we ve ever seen Joe Biden unable to handle it he's nowhere to be found. But these these, these these people are being encouraged to combine policies and commonly is laughing about the whole thing remarkable device presents response by the sharp criticism online pay commonly you better get down there. She laughs off a lot of questions because she's, incompetent, no she's, not levy which is incumbent she's laughing at you, he's laughing at all of us, because she knows she can do whatever she wants she can mark. Little smear deride and gloat in the human suffering?

others, because she is a bad person. That's why it was so powerful tools he gathered smacked her down Hirsch. You went when, when Camelot mocked, smoking like laugh about smoking weed, but then was locking up people for smoking weed when she threatened and laughed about locking up single mothers because their kids weren't in school. She is a psychopath who enjoys human suffering. That's why she is laughing when they're, like you called Biden, racist. She bus south laughing. Why cause? She knows. You can't do nothing about it. She knew that even though she called you but in a racist and the media was calling it out. She laughs her ass off because she knew he'd get elected anyway.

She knows she can act with impunity. She can laugh in your face spit near face disrespect you and derive those who are suffering, and she knows she will get elected anyway. That's the sickness that that that our is dealing with someone said translation. No, she wasn't talking about your vacation plans. Kamala Harris there Kamala Harris, there's a crisis. You are ignoring, not a joke, not funny and people deserve real answers, I'm sure I will again said another furious contributor by also that on Sunday and you'll be making it. At some point. Despite previously, he had no plans to visit Harris was in Florida as she promoted the passage of the one point,

trillion coronavirus relief package. She posts his phone she's like help us here. Florida Florida is doing fine, I mean, except for the riots spring break and the women working on cop cars and stuff, but that's something totally different. Will they be made to answer for laughing about the crisis? The answer is no. Maybe the journalists might actually ask a real question: but I would like to see you know if we had a real press, a real every for every single one would say sake at the next press briefing. Why is Vice President Harris laughing at? What's going on the border? and then, when she gives you some dumb non answer. Well, I think she was just laughing to alleviate attention. No, no! No! No. Why is she laughing at all? I don't care, do you think it's appropriate that she's laughing while children are being locked in cages. Nelson Others have come out showing these in these facilities and it's bad, it's real bad people talk about the pandemic.

And these kids are lying next to each other like shoulder to shoulder, but basically touching so yeah. It's going to be a huge problem. Their claiming that you know under Trump it was kids in cages. I'd like to see the same level of scrutiny now now my purse, opinion I don't blame you administration having kids in these facilities. I don't what I tell you. I think it's really funny he conservatives all of a sudden being like look. What Biden is doing- and this is what really noise me about politics, not divide in minutes, is is doing the right thing with these kids is perfect. No can they give given better facilities? Probably, but they can't just have the kids wander the desert? It's not funny. It's sick, it's a net negative! It's a horrifying. Didn't we find ourselves in Boston deserves to be criticised by the left for their own principles, but they won't do it, which now have conservatives doing it. Hence the stupidest thing ever tromp was not wrong to operate facilities to hold these children when we don't know where their parents are, but

not not wrong. Do the exact same thing, but it is, however, the spineless empathetic leadership that is causing the problem become worse, commonly Harrison knows and she thinks it's. She it's hilarious. She thinks it's funny you up. That's it. That's what we get with President Joe Biden. He makes it worse. The migrant say I am coming because of him and then comma laughs about it. The cartels are using. This The cartels are that they're they're they're getting in the business, they know think about how insanely weak Joe Biden is, that he's opened the door to such crime to such suffering, man I thought the Bod administration was going to be something on banana stuff and stuff, and it is, I just thought it would be funnier than that, not sad and twist

said at an end and the common Harris thing makes it all just so much worse, the mockery, the laughter, it's disgusting, I leave it there. Next, I mean coming up at one p m on this channel. Thanks for out and I'll see you all them. I'm sure by now many of you have heard about the tragic incident that occurred in Boulder Colorado, I'm not going to get into graph. Detail, because I want to focus on the arguments that are affecting us politically from things like this. First and foremost, the culprit in this tragic incident, they said many progressives was a white man, because preliminary photos came out showing what appeared to be a white men as it turns out. I guess quickly. It's not a white guy. How? I wonder how the rules work on the left, but this guy's, apparently a Muslim who hated Trump hated conservatives and had sympathies, ISIS, which is another stereotypical type, mean culprit. I suppose we have a few tweets that are included in a post from the post, MILAN

Ian miles, Chong says from the suspects now removed Facebook page, he said quote: he inherited a growing economy and the unemployment rate was- LO the economy was on an upwards spiral. He won because of racism. Is your comments that the culprit in boulder said about Donald Trump, the recent to bring this up is not because this segment is going to be about this man is certainly going to be about uncontrolled and political manipulation? The left there was one to use Amy, Cisco, sad, you know. Obviously it was a white man that did that and then once the name came out and there was an owl in front of it and people realised it was not yours, you're typical white male. This was a guy with accused of having, ISIS sympathies. Now she said something like: let's not glorify the shooter and focused focus on his name. Alright. Well, as you can probably expect

This is all moving in one direction: gun control- and I gotta tell you my friends. Having become a gun owner in the past year? It's real the insane reading tweets from many of these people, because, right now the big trend on Twitter is a our fifteen. Second, amendment, gun control, etc, and it's amazing how little the people know what they're driven by tribalism. That's it they're, not driven by solutions right? Many of these people said they want gun control because they want to minimize harm. I would believe that if they actually said, that had a conversation with somebody who understood anything about guns. When I try explaining the people anything about guns, they recoil go full tribal and say, why are you defending the person or we just want to lives or they change the subjects, shouted to my good friend Cameron Caskey, who normally I like the tweet the post is in a bit of a you know, traditional leftist, where I should

left us is more of a traditional liberal. You know, programmer grat type personality does is that the EU has us those typical Democrat talking points and when I point out a few things, notably, he sat. He mocks. Second amendment rights. Individuals- and which includes left us and I'll prove it. He says you know he's laughing. It is people who think that their unveiled to defend themselves against the US government and things like that. Response, was you know, ask the Vietcong or the Taliban. Hellfire missiles cannot occupy city streets instead of responding with any kind of defence of his idea. He just breaks down huts, making Starkey jokes, I find I get it. You're trolling, don't actually believe what you're saying our. I guess I felt I walked into that that trap and Caskey doesn't actually believe what purports to to boast about fine, if I got troll, I got trolls, but there are many people who are following him in responding who don't know anything about this stuff. I want to make a simple point about what is a hunting rifle verses? What,

is an actual weapon of war people don't like the truth, frozen art familiar with We get into the news with a set of Judiciary Committee would have been a screen and we're to talk about manipulation, media propaganda and tribalism. I would just like to say all the people who are saying ban a our fifteen's your now saying anything like I don't understand and what it is you actually want to ban, because there's a bunch of other kinds of guns, that function. Similarly, semi automatic rifles and the air fifteen is just one of many would, would banning the air fifteen mean not banning they are ten. Would that mean that, like vectors- and you know routers, those are all fine, Are you saying you don't want semi automatic rifles or you are you're talking specifically about like five five, six, NATO? I don't know what you mean when you say this

I've been trying to this thing where they're like look at every single one of these instances where I tried, you just happened and it's all ar 15S and I'm like that's like saying done. It's like look at all of these incidences with guns and they used a gun I'm ok, you don't really crazy that really wanna get at it, because I've become much more of a gun now don't answer was eight advocates post but as a gun owner- and someone actually knows about this stuff, it's getting really frustrating for makes I'll tell you this. I do believe there are regulations and laws that could actually help solve these problems. I know, and all of this launch to a people recoil in disgusted. Hortense I hold on, I didn't say where those regulations would lie, and I think we need we devil. Legitimate conversation about whether or not background checks work.

Whether or not there is an issue with mental health. You see the problem. The regulation to stop gun violence doesn't need to be necessarily on guns. There's other things that can be done in There are areas how about everyone's allowed to keep and bear arms, but then you have specific, I don't know yet you have guards you prepare for these things. I'm just saying so. But a legitimate conversation about gun control and done rights. Does necessarily mean the solution. Putting laws on guns, ammunition and gun accessories, especially with d printing there's photos of people, the three print and mill their own weapons, man, cats out of the bag. Well, here we go baby, near Post, Post Senate, Judiciary Committee to hold gun, violence, hearing Tuesday, atop Senate Committee, will convene Tuesday for a hearing on gun violence less than twenty four hours after the tragedy in boulder

this attitude, a Judiciary committee will kick off its constitutional and common sense steps to reduce gun violence, hearing at ten a m which will consider public health law enforcement and community based approaches aimed at saving lives and making communities safer. I got no problem with that. Issue, I will say it is likely, which I will likely have a problem with. Is that it's all a disguise for just taking away people's rights. The left and the right are in complete agreement, people have a right to keep in bear arms. I know I know all of a sudden everyone's saying hat are you talking about the left wants to ban guns? They don't because I don't consider For a right corporate democrats to be left us, and that is mitten, maybe I should play

fi and we should adapt our speaking on this because I have often referred the Democrats as the left in colloquial sense, but in the true left, the Marxists, the Socialists, I always point out these people, love guns and Karl Marx, told them to NASA. Democrats are starting to push this narrative and we do have these tragedies. I wanna show you just how depraved things can really be set this out. A few weeks ago we saw what looked like a co the native series of fake stories, mass shooting surgeon, Pennsylvania's nation, faces record high mass sergeant. Miss misery, as nation faces record high in Florida record High Tennessee record High met in Wisconsin in New York, Mass shootings fall, but nation faces record high. What's with all of these ideas, stories that are written the exact same way, which are line well

I shouldn't so said: Missus, Ersite, necessarily so long but poorly framed to mislead people into not realising. What's going, You may have heard about what happened in boulder land on these are horrifying stories in it and it breaks my heart when I hear these things, would you dont you about what happened in Chicago Deja did did ya you're about what happened Chicago last weekend. You didn't. Why is that? Why is it that you didn't hear about what happened in Chicago a week ago, because it was I am equally or worse, evil is better or worse these tragedies. I think it's because the woke left. These are white progressive from the suburbs They are not moved or inspired by a story about inner city, black youth, engaging in acts of violence against other inner city, black youth. I am motivated by this because I see these stories and I think it's a nightmare. I lived those I grew up in Chicago. I saw these things ploughed. I saw fights, devolve into into shoot out

or almost shootouts, but I've seen people in Chicago should guns. I'd been shot rant, shot at Random Lane Chicago dont know why? When are they? source which goggled breaks my heart and I look around and they don't tell that story. You know why I think they're actually targeting well to do white liberals. There are not left us, their white liberals, their authoritarian right corporate democrat pipes. These are people who want to be in the tribe and want to push the narrative, and so do they relate to Chicago inner city, youth, violence. Now, of course, not at stories lacking to motivate anybody you'd think they can play the races angolan sites, these poor communities, the problem is Crime is among minorities targeting minorities, so what they do. They focus on other instances where they can make it about a different race attacking a different rice. Thus, race,

I tried to do that with bolder turns out. The guy was actually a Muslim, so I don't know how that plays out with their narrative. We'll talk about gun control, my friends get into some. Some of what we are seeing on social media first thing to do is show you how the best court, probably from Karl Marx now Karl Marx, has one of the best quotes yeah. That's right. I can hear all the communists are all the capitalists cringing, but It's true and I'll, read for you, Karl Marx, said under no pretext should arm. And ammunition be surrendered. Any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated by force, if necessary, whoop Karl he's he he's got it got it on that, one it to him. The reality is Caro marks may have had a fairly dumb ideology, but he had a lot of things right. He pointed out

a lot of important things, the problem is solution. His solutions, not good, I think it's fair to say that marks identified some problems and pointed out some. Areas like this. Where under no pretext should you give up your arms or ammunition. The problem is his ideology, ultimately lead dictators to weapon eyes it for the opposite of what he probably actually intended. That's too bad a lot of his ideas, made sense a lot and I would say his solutions are nightmarish and childish. But when it comes to this, he pointed out something correct and there's ache. You'll see from many leftists they'll say it on Twitter under no pretext. I love it at a fantastic phrase and I'll use it now the right to up the keeping back arms shall not be infringed and under no pretext should our,

and ammunition be surrendered. I agree, and I gotta tell you it's not about, in my opinion, a tyrannical government for many people. It is not for me for me it's about for one I've as an individual. I am not going to be to the whims of some lunatic, wants to break into my house and and and kill and robbed me because he doesn't care about the law. I do care about the law, which means as a law abiding citizens, I abide by the laws as appertains to firearms if they ban certain firearms guess what, depending on what laws work if the grandfather and then you know we're fine, but if they said you can't have it Thank you. I'd give it up, because I follow lot- and therein lies the big problem we lie, Abiding citizens dont want conflict, war or crisis, but we want the right to defend ourselves. I especially have I've already already told in insert states where they're like you're, not allowed to have a gun. Unless you have a legitimate reason, there are oh yeah, you definitely do cause I've, stalkers and creep up. Creepy people have tried breaking in my home. Should I not have the right to do that?

myself. So then they say yes, we only want to ban a our fifteen and unlike fine, but that makes no sense. What are you really banning salt so any other? open that can fire a five hundred and fifty six or two hundred and twenty three is fine. Just not that specific model that specific build you're not telling me anyting most like a look at how we're doing the onion. You might have seen this no way to prevent this says only nation where this regularly happens. It's amazing. I made fun of several news outlets for fact checking the Babylon Bee, but at it is a sad day when we have to remind people what a joke is because people on the left to both If the union is real, so I don't understand

that issue. When you know Snopes had to date, had effected the Babylon. Be it's because many of these these these liberal democrat types, not the left us the leftist by think believed on things but hey we can. We can agree on certain things right. It's these traditions. Democrat types that think satire is real. They think it's real. They think The real story, without the only She was regularly happens. It's just Google search it. That's not true amazing, so I Google search it mass shootings by country, twenty twenty one per capita, the! U S is number sixty six in terms mass shootings. Now, because we are a very large country with three and thirty million people, yet course we have more mass shootings, but that's just hard numbers as an actual taken account of the culture of the issue. Europe has more apparently a small box at the smoke

I'm sorry, it's Norway, but you can see Norway has the death rate per hour. Deaths per one million. Is one point: eight, the? U S is point zero, eight, nine remarkable. So it's just not true. My next question is Chicago New York allay how many mass shootings like how many of these these, like you know, just shooting events, do we have in a Texas where people got or Yarmouth either West Virginia, People are as rationally armed to the teeth and you have constitutional carry she's. Not there is it. It's weird, isn't it? Let me show you some: we have this post From Muslim Marine, a verified, twitter user, he posts and air fifteen uses, its uses, the same exact round my m16 used when I served in the Marines, even as an give duty marine our weapons were stocked locked in an armoury and only permitted during training or war, PS and air fifteen as a weapon of war,

and should not belong in the hands of everyday citizens. No, it isn't. M16 is that's why we have the civilian variant the AR fifteen. Here's. What I don't understand I mean I guess I do get it narrative right. This guy in Muslim Marines, a verified user got two thousand and three under read rates on this post and it's just lies all lies. If I want to sit down with you and have a conversation about what weapons we do want to ban and why you have to at least be honest with me, but they're, not their authoritarian, authoritarian right there not libertarian right there, not authoritarian left there, like centre right, authoritarian, want a mixed system where capitalism works for the powers that be they wanted, take away your rights. They are not about kind of distribution, they're kind of in the middle, I suppose so- maybe there's authoritarian center. He kind of like the Nazis. Let's break this down an AR fifteen is not a weapon of war, quite literally, not depending on which round you have a chamber, for it could be for a variety of purposes.

An air fifteen is functionally just a modern semi automatic rifle. So is a Ruger ten, twenty two you going to ban that next, I guess it fires, twenty two, so sure, whatever The point is, this is a lie to manipulation. Right. Let me let me show you the Bush master for those in art. Familiar ok. I know many of you probably know a lot more about guns that But, as someone who has has you know recently been purchasing more weapons and learning about their functions and their uses, I give you the four hundred and fifty bushmaster versus the two hundred and twenty three Remington, the two hundred and twenty three Remington is what you're going to find in this I believe, the m16 for which Muslim Maria's referring to is chambered for five five, six, that's his weapon of war. This is functionally identical. The two Two three remington and the five five six are interchangeable. Almost the same thing, the five five six. I'm not entirely sure. The difference is, I think, a higher pressure. So the two two three remington is still a powerful round. Now

on the left on the screen, I'm displaying a four fifty Bush master with a polymer Tipp. This is larger and larger round, designed to one shot, big game. It is more powerful and more devastating and interestingly, it can fit. My Another is true, but it is my understanding of IRAN correct if I'm wrong for froze out another another guns. More than me, they ve for fifty Bush master can fit. In a magazine that is supposed to be for the staggered two to three. Five, six meaning the magazines are interchangeable. So let me tell you something: the round to the left, which is bigger is bigger:

was designed specifically for hunting. It was literally designed to one shot, big gamehogs and deer. So when you are hunting you're, not firing too many rounds, you didn't five hundred and fifty six going to cut it. You need something better than AR fifteen can be chambered in four hundred and fifty and in fact, that's fairly common in in in the Wikipedia article four four fifty Bush master. They actually show- and I are fifteen so when this guy says they are for teen, uses the same round. What is what does that mean? That's like just like a car can have an engine, so you had a five five six now we're talking about a totally totally different for for different purpose, in which case the four push master, is a hunting round design for hunting using a rifle that is used for hunting. Why would that get banned? What's? What's what? What? What's the issue? It simple, there's two things

Most of you probably know this most of you probably know more than me, but it's just a lie to manipulate and I go to some of the tweets here. Second, amendment is trend. People are discussing the second amendment which guarantees the right of people to keep in bear arms. After an incident in Boulder Colorado, one person says reality check. The second amendment was written about muskets. Was it what's the definition of arms pretty sure. People had private warships back in the day, so I am not entirely convinced. That's correct junk! You give the young Turks as quick quiz What is the only thing in the? U S, constitution, imagines regulations, answer second amendment, it clearly states. People with weapons must be well regulated in America. That has been interpreted to mean. That is the one thing that should have absolutely no regulations insanity. This to me is proof that Jen Huger is not a leftist

He is an authoritarian right, corporate democrat masquerading as a leftist to rope up progressive votes for the Democrats. Of course, I've said that for a long time, right, let's fix this one the actual language of the original article before it was put into the bill of rights, actually clarified, you need not be. In the military to bear arms. They got rid of it out of a fear that they thought it could be construed to prevent conscription, which was very important time. Ok, well regulated. What does that mean? What we get an argument all day and night out it, but it's irrelevant. The text to the second amendment is a well regulated militia that, for you know being necessary for a free state. The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed per head. The founding fathers should have just put the fact that the last part of that in there, but the first part was not referring to a govern and regulated militia. The general idea of you, Chile, read. History was well regular

I did in the sense that regular people, normal people in their homes should have functional, clean up writing weapons because the militia was not the national guard. The militia was not the army, they were farmers, work, wet guns and were called upon when the defense was needed. What does that mean? Well regulated could basically mean when called upon not government telling you can't have the weapon, that's the opposite of what it says. Think about what what what What they're saying here with this paradox of language, a well regulated militia, being you know necessary for free state, etc. The right Keepin bare arm shall not be infringed. Keep and their arms certainly has been. Infringement that. You can't bear arms at all, for any reason, no no joke, but why is it that it would say

a well regulated militia is necessary and that you should keep the right to keep me. I shall not be infringed. How is Genk Huger construing to mean, quite literally, they can restrict what arms you have. Its has not be infringed the right to keep bear arms written about muskets shore, but there are a bunch of there there were a bunch of weapons back then that were devastating. I mean they artillery they had cannons. So what the issue is weak We fought the Revolutionary WAR, the Boston Massacre, gun control. All the stuff played a role in the founding fathers knew it that meant. The idea is it's I think serve as this one wrong too, and then the second It is about tyrannical government. It's not it's. Partly it's about defending a free state period let's say we are these United States and a foreign invader in

AIDS. Our soil. There is a gun behind every blade of grass. That means to maintain a free state from enemies. Both foreign and domestic. The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Perhaps that was the appropriate language they should have used, they didn't, we can argue all day and night, but one thing is clear: the people on the left have no idea what they are talking about when it comes to how guns function and and what their for and why we should or should not have them. That's my biggest problem with it and it's always been problem with it. I've never been a staunch anti to a person. I've never been one of these liberals ban guns. No, because I grew up as like a far left anarchist type and don't trust the government, but at a certain, I kind of like we do, need some regulations, and I cannot put it this way. I think we need national reciprocity. We need uniform code for the entire country. So, as this means Many states like Illinois, New York Maryland New Jersey, would have.

Regulations relaxed. It would mean that some some states would have regulations increased to what extent I am not entirely sure, but in a conversation we had about it. I don't believe in a gun registry. I don't believe in God. Insurance, I used to actually think gun insurance made sense. The problem is the constitution, and it's not the problem for us. The problem for them They want to change the rules and they went out these things They need to amend the constitution. You get the states on board that we now have a talk for the time being, I am interested in sight. To certain states where there Just like look, you could. You can drive the Indiana Eleven Scott. So they did the to Indiana. They buy a gun, they bring it back to Illinois illegally there already breaking the law, so I don't know what else you change when they're already breaking the law, but maybe I'm kind of uniformity, that's about it. Ultimately, I view as being appropriate as every state Caesar reduction and gun control measures. What you're allowed to own

and a slight increase in so I don't or the slight increase is because us I don't know I think it's fair to say that many of these blue states need to have many of their restrictions. So lonely removed to align properly with the second amendment- and perhaps that's where we stop, I dont think red flag, laws work, and I think, as long as the constitution says, you're have the right keep in bear arms. We have a challenge that, if you want to change These laws than you got to change the constitution. Now does the possibility of precedent. When I say I think there should be some increase in some states on basically refer bring to I'm not a poet I had a conversation with a guy in New Jersey. Who does trainings and and train the police and he said he thought that it was. Too easy in some states to acquire weapons and that something we should consider. But if we're looking at it

like blue states, have too many regulations and some sites have too few. The bigger problem is it's not a ten, the blue, data too many regulations and too many regulations and the eighty efforts too confusing and the whole system is broken. Ultimately, what I'm, trying to say is to make sure our making this clear. If everybody, I think we need like a night. Five to ninety nine percent reduction in regulation, and then a very simple, uniform code that affects the entire country. It would probably mean some states would see some kind of increase but overweight Everybody would see like a ninety. Ninety five percent drop in gun control laws are I I can make this one too long. You get the point. I am not an expert on guns, I'm just a due to start buying weapons and learning about it. In the past year, probably get a lot wrong. There are some people and I had this conversation on TIM guest. I rarely my check out the show where I was basically like dude. Along a second amendment, says it there can't be laws blocking this: the right to free speech, the only

You can't do is in sight, someone to commit violence or commit a crime. There's a chance. Is there in that? If they just keep increasing laws and increasing crime than they can have Julie, criminalize, hate speech in I'm saying you know something having to do with incitement and then they claim that hate speeches, incitement? We must defend our rights. Yeah- well, I guess I'll put it. There are put it that way because, as this is conversation that are probably be had fifty billion times for for ten hours or leave their necks, coming up at four p m over at Youtube outcome, liked him castigates rang out, and I will see you all them.