Today is March Twenty fourth, twenty twenty one and our first story, Joe Biden, how they secret meeting with historians to discuss just how quickly and how much he can re engineer the United States. Many are likening this to an effort by Joe Biden, push a new deal style policy through, and maybe even a few Five trillion dollar infrastructure package, many conservative, concerned. This will just be a far left push which brings us to our second story. Joe Biden Called foreign national assault, weapons band he's even stated he could pursue executive action too. I'm guns or stopped on violence, many the right and many gun rights activists, including pro second amendment leftists, are concerned. Biden may seek to well take people's guns and our last story. Operations are officially here Evanston. Illinois a suburb of Chicago, as announced they will be providing reparations to the black community

we are also seeing a new effort in Oakland that will provide guaranteed income to low income families. With one caveat, they can't be white, it seems like as reparations start to make their way across the country it moves beyond repair damage and just moves towards well giving non white individuals access to resources that white individuals will naturally have but will explore this before we get started. Leave us a good review. If you like the podcast, there's a lot of work, I put the show and if you think it's deserving of five stars really does help, leave a good comment and share this with your friends. That's really the best way to help support the show. Now, let's get into that first story: Joe Biden recently held an undisclosed

Session they call it to me sounds like a secret meeting with historians to determine how much and how fast he can radically alter these United States in the act. They say Biden's new deal, Reengineering America quickly. One of the ways in which Biden could do this is removing the Senate filibuster, which would allow Democrats to ram through tons of legislation without sixty votes in the Senate. I think the filibuster is a good thing. It requires compromise. You need sixty votes essentially to pass a bill if the Republicans decide to filibuster, and that means you'll have to come to the negotiating table at a time when this country's extremely hyper polarized. I think it's important binds plans and his moves to reengineer America quickly means that Democrats, with their narrow majority in these different branches of government, are planning on doing sweeping changes that half the count.

Does not want at a time when everybody's a little you know hot in their seat and worried about political violence and an escalation in the culture war. Several polls have come out, and this is what's really interesting to me. Some say that Republicans are more likely to advocate for violence. Some say it's actually the far left there are more likely to advocate for violence. While there are several pulsing republicans are growing, increasing. Increasingly agitated and more are likely to suggest violence can be used as a means to get things done. It is still that there are still other poles saying inverse and say that over the past four years, it's actually the very liberal weapon embracing these positions with Joe Biden making these moves. I fear he may be ripping this country apart. You have to understand what re engineering this country means they're, calling it binds noodle, while some people may say to massive infrastructure plan that would help the working class others point out.

The escalation in critical race theory build a blog Yos plan in New York for his race commission to change the world likely other Democrats will believe the same things and Joe Buttons recent calls for massive and sweeping gun control knife from other people, and they say For the most part, there can be moderate changes and they typically dont care, as long as the government makes these changes slowly. Peep, Allow them to happen even if their rights are being stripped away, but a rapid, quick re engineering of this country could be the final straw in just ripping this country apart and I'm worried about it. Why would Joe Biden plan this he's meeting with historians that to me knows that he understands the risks he needs to know what happened in the past and how much we can push this country before it finally erupts into chaos I'm no fan of the Bite administration recently that the other day they now some sanction

on China, and I think you know all point out the positives. That may be the right approach, I'm glad the Bite administration is doing something about China, but then I see things like that: and it says to me that they're making rapid transformational changes, which will people who people who are already agitated in this culture war exactly what exactly what their proposal is and what's happening want to point out. Donald Trump according to VOX com. Rent is a a moderate. He did not Bring about this massive sweeping change they claimed was was going to some of the policies criticized him for came, came from Obama, notably notably the kids in cages thing or the travel ban. These remnants remnants of the Obama administration, Joe Biden, is planning planning on doing they. As as bigger bolder than Obama, and he needs historians to guide him lest he really destroyed this country before we get started had over the TIM cast out com and become a member

to get access to exclusive members. Only segments of the TIM cast iron podcast, that's a show. We do live lady of around eight p m every night. Signing guess. I com helps me and my shows the people who work on them in the event that we get banned or purged this is what allowing us to keep moving forward and allowing us to expand would get a new web come on. We ve got more employees coming, I mean we're. Gonna have writers, have content, videos blogs all that stuff and its with your support so that it can get outcome become a member and don't forget to like share subscribe, hit that Notification Bell. Let's read the story from oxytocin figure out what going on. They say Biden's new deal, re Engineering, America quickly. President Biden recently held an undisclosed EAST room session with historians. That included a discussion of how big is too big and how fast is too fast to jam through once in a lifetime. His

or exchanges to America why it matters that historians view were very much in sync with his own. It is time to go even bigger and faster than any one expected if that means chucking the filibuster and bi partisanship, so be it there's a four things are pushing bite into jam through what could amount to a five trillion dollar plus overhaul of Amerika and vast changes to voting immigration and any quality one yes, full party control of Congress and a short window to go big too. He s party activists begging him on three. He has strong gathering economic winds at his back and for he's popular,

in the polls that last but the immigration, the inequality, I think is, I think all of it is just them basically saying now's our chance to seize the ground. This is political warfare. Okay, call it culture, war, call it conflict, call it cold civil war, call it whatever you want, but these voting changes like HR, one would nationalized the voting process which, for the longest time, was left to the states. That's freaking people out that statements about immigration at a time when we're dealing with a massive migrant crisis on the border of border crisis. That many are criticising, Joe Biden for even the left is criticising Joe Biden over this Joe Biden abandoned many. The plants trump put in place and its only getting worse

Then you have inequality, Joe Biden, rescinded, Trump's executive order on critical race theory. This is the Democrats realizing their power is limited, though they do have full party control of Congress they're on the verge of losing it and likely will in two thousand and twenty two now, should they make massive and sweeping changes that just infuriates the other side and leads us down a chaotic and dangerous path? It's possible that twenty Republicans just when and then revert much of this but Joe, but it will still

be the president and could very easily veto and block much of what the Republicans in Congress could do. It'll depend on if there's a if, if republicans are able to win back the house and who was up for re election in the Senate, they gonna say presidential historian, Michael Bash loss, told axles, Sdr and L B. J may turn out to be the past centuries closest analogues for the by narrow in terms of transforming the country in important ways. In a short time, special ah said, the parallels include the new deal, economic relief that, after our brought nineteen thirty three which saved the country from the depression and chaos, and that's it

Julie disputed be honest, certainly hope, you'll ask some people not sang disputed by you know what with merit necessarily, but that a political argument as to whether or not the new deal did actually save us and bite is on track to leave the country in a different place as Lyndon Johnson did with his great society programmes. People close to bind tell us he's feeling bullish on what he can accomplish and is fully prepared to support the dashing of the Senate filibuster rule to allow Democrats to pass voting rights and other trophy legislation for his party. He loves the growing narrative that he's bolder and

you're thinking than Obama. This temptation to go even bigger Senate republican leader Mitch Mcconnell insists, will create such a fisher between the parties that he compared it this week to nuclear winter, but we're told Biden won't hesitate just ass. He passed the one point: nine trillion dollar covet rescue package with zero republican votes and zero regrets. His team sees little chance he's going to be able to require the government in his image if he play by the rules of bringing in at least ten Republicans, he won't run our noses and we're told that'll, be the Biden touch to rolling the opposition and getting them much closer to the status of latter day after buttons list includes rural broadband expansion. Now that's a good thing which would be transformative for those communities make China tax credits, permanent landmark legislation on climate guns and voting climate guns and voting. That's where you are going to encounter some very serious.

Problems, and I got to say we are not in a simple political bickering time. The time where it's like all binding wants to pass these things. While her, I I know what a time where people are freaking out and both sides there are poles showing have escalating acceptance of some form of political violence, not ok with that. We do not want political violence. We do not want this country falling apart. We need to be unified and Joe Biden is not doing this. This move it ignoring the other side is not going to solve any problems, I'm not sure. What will I will show you vocs dot com and twenty nineteen Democrats are learning are wrong lesson for Trump from Trump. He ran as a moderate, and it worked that's from Matthew, Iglesias for vocs DOT, VOX Com, even they called Trump.

A moderate what we're hearing from Mitch Mcconnell a nuclear winter foretold. They report a Senate operating in the nuclear Winter Minority leader Mitch. Mcconnell promises, if the filibuster is eliminated, is one in which law, makers, face incessant roll calls and other inconveniences turning their comfortable lives into a living hell. Why it matters in employing a pocket, Dick language to warn about scorched earth response. The Kentucky Republican is trying to scare Democrats away from the tool their considering to break through the GEO, peas, own political abstinence. They save some tools, Mcconnell's disposal, demanding roll call, votes on procedural points of order, forcing democratic, democratic senators and Vice President Kamel Harris. The Thai breaking fifty first vote to live on stand by the capital. Unnecessary quorum calls pausing, Senate business,

the secondary issues, a roll call vote to ensure all one hundred senators are present on the floor. It only takes one member to call for it rotating Republicans onto the floor for hours, long debate about the motions and bills reminiscent of the technique illustrated in the nineteen thirty nine movie. Mr Smith goes to Washington

asking Senate secretaries to read through lengthy bills and amendments similar to what Senator RON Johnson did before a vote on President Biden Coronavirus for leaf package, which took more than ten hours Senate GOP Aids say they could introduce two thousand page substitute amendments to make the process particularly Tds Senate AIDS. Mcconnell would be very strategic about he and other Republicans fiddle with the rules, and they insist he is not bluffing. They point to a Wall Street Journal opinion piece by columnist, Kim stressed, saying it was spot on in detailing the pain Mcconnell could inflict. If Democrats go down this route. This is political. I'm not entirely worried about Mitch Mcconnell getting political. What I'm worried about is the fact that Joe Biden could deal with the sludge thrown at him by Mcconnell, but that's all it is Republicans, have long state as I

once. I seem to just be going slow down their democrats, but doing nothing to actually oppose their plans or advocate for what Republicans one easiest way to understand this universal health care is a constant talking point from the left with demands they implement this business bill and Republicans offering of nothing to Republicans, I mean other than just trying to stop Democrats. That's not leadership, that's why so many people liked Donald Trump. Well, let's talk about climate guns and what will look? Let's, let's, let's see exactly what will through its climate guns and voting. Ok, let's start with climate. Thirteen states sue the Biden administration over federal oil and gas leasing ban the daily collar reports. A coalition of thirteen states have sued Joe Buttons Administration Wednesday, over its January, twenty seventh ban of new oil and

on federal, federalist quote by executive field, Joe Biden and his administration have single handedly, driven the price of energy up Louisiana attorney General Jeff Landry SAD during a press conference Wednesday Bindings Executive violated, both the outer continental Shelf Lands ACT and the man Releasing act which affirms congresses intend to you U S resources to achieve energy independence, the lawsuit alleged that may just be political bickering. Ok, these fights happen. Thirteen states are suing Biden. We ve seen like we ve, seen things like this before, but let's talk about Joe Biden, let's talk about. Guns, the BBC reports. U S gun Control Biden calls for a ban on assault weapons. The BBC says he renewed his call for to banish all weapons and high capacity magazines and urged Congress to pass bills. That would end loopholes in background checks. Let me let me just pause Roquat. Can you may have heard me say this: there's no loopholes in the background check, pressed,

Anybody who wants to go to a licensed firearm dealer must be process through I see ass next. They national instant criminal track system now for private sales in some places words aloud. It is a crime I minors. A felony to transfer weapon as someone who was not legally allowed to have it? So you still have the responsibility to know what you are doing so in a loophole, though, there's just no universal background check system from a licensed dealer. There is in some places there aren't now. What Joe Biden is proposing is a ban on assault weapons and even threatened executive action, so the problem here and I'm not gonna rehash little gun argument had a ton of it is about it already. Is that assault up and is not legally defined at the federal level, and even when it is, it makes literally no sense. There are many different weapons, there's three printing and what they define as assault weapon. It just makes no sense in I want, and I want to try and make sure I can educate people enough on this issue.

But I will tell you they say what what makes say a Ruger ten thousand twenty two go from a hunting rifle to an assault. Weapon is a pistol grip which changes very little. Or the size of the magazine or that the stock, whether its retractable or folding. These things don't change what the gun does it doesn't change the fact that its the same firearm, they just have strange definitions, is unchanged. The fact that in some places than M one a rifle is concerned, which is a variant on in world war, two style rifle is an assault weapon, but a modern r? Twenty S, isn't that makes no sense. Now that ultimately doesn't matter for the point of this segment, I bring up the guns issue because many people have said that is what will truly ignite a real hot conflict. If Joe Biden announces,

he's gonna do the sweeping the reach trillion dollar package, overhauling, voting and guns and us in inequality, social justice issues and there, and then the gun issues on top of this than people may be pushed to the My fear is we've already seen from the left autonomous zones. You have the g as they call it. The George flowed autonomous Zone in Minnesota, Minneapolis the violence there.

Is excessive. What we ve heard from residence is horrifying. What happens when the federal government takes action? That half the country doesn't not agree with, and then they just say no already Joe Biden come out and said we may need more covert restrictions, but places like Texas said now we good and then they reopened. Joe Biden is not speaking on behalf of a United States like he's Bingham have literally this country for sure, but the red states are telling him shove off the blues data, saying all right, no Biden already, he does not have the confidence of half of this country so pushing forward a hyper pop.

As an hyper polarized massive overhaul of his country. It's going to push people towards dangerous extremes. In my opinion, to collective, historically or post de Palacio announces new world changing racial Justice Commission. They say the move came after the plaza touted it in advance more than a dozen times of the past year, but he gave the eleven Member Commission a deadline to submit its recommendations in December when he, when he'll become when he'll be a lame duck falling than ever November to mayoral election changing did he? Charter requires approval by voters and last happened and twenty nine?

when the powers of the civilian Complaint Review Board were expanded. De Palacio claimed his new panels. Work would be mild in part on that of South Africa's post apart. I truth and Reconciliation Commission saying we want to take from those international models, adapt them adapt them to the reality here. Racism has been with us for years, but can't, but it can be eradicated. Mayor said this group will change the world truth and reconciliation before the election. We heard Democrats say That's the only way to move forward is truth and reconciliation. Well, that generated massive backlash. Conservatives, notably we're freaking out saying: what do you mean by truth and reconciliation commissions? Oh they mean some pretty serious stuff. They mean reallocation of property. They mean restriction on certain rights for certain individuals, they're talking about in Evanston, Illinois, Grand in money to families as reparations they're talking about providing relief to farmers, but only farmers of of color as they as they describe.

This means we are going to see are already divided nation, which has divided based on political ideology and obvious ways: geography We're now going to see it divided additionally, based on race, more so than it already is. This kind of action is exactly what conservatives were angry about when the media kept saying they would bring about truth and reconciliation. Commission now Deblasio wants wants to do it. They to say Deblasio didn't detail, detail that that would happen but said he was open to the idea of paying patients after reporters had the commission's chairwoman, Jennifer Jones, Austin C of the Federation of protestant wealth or agencies has called that something to be considered. Betsy got bomb of the good government Group Citizens Union called the timing of DE bloggers announcement so near the end of his two term tenure very bizarre,

So maybe it's meaningless, but only highlighted the Bosnia circumstances, the plaza scenario or situation because were curious as to what Joe Biden will be doing in terms of equity, inequality and immigration. Are starting to see what Democrats will do and will start to get an image of what Joe Biden will represent. Actual reports Biden puts Harris in charge of the border crisis. Of this one is significant, let's red and then I'll tell you why it so serious. They say President Biden is putting Vice President Harrison Charge of addressing them, I grant Sir TAT, the? U S. Mexico border senior administration officials announced on Wednesday, just as President Obama tasked Biden was. Fixing, the? U S, economy after he assumed office into those, None Biden is putting his own vice president in charge of a problem threatening to overshadow the new administrations. Own successful launch Harris will lead efforts with Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador to manage the flow of unaccompanied children and migrant families arriving at the border in number

not seen since a surge in twenty nineteen starting today, the northern Triangle Nations in Mexico. No, there was eight. There was one senior official dedicated to this effort to be very clear as an important task. Senior administration official told reporters donor conference call. It was hell just an hour before a white ossified event with Biden Harris Homeland Security, Alessandro made May yorkists and health and Human Services Secretary Xavier. Sarah, the announcement and high level meeting coming the same day, the White House arranged a trip for senior aides and member of Congress to South Texas illustrated the breadth of the administration's efforts to get control of the problem. Republicans It Biden is to blame for refusing to reinstate a trump era policy to expel unaccompanied minors, as well as more accommodating language. The president's own prosecutor concedes is connected to its humanitarian values. What they're saying quote President Biden said during the transition, whatever the most urgent need, he would turn to the vice president. One of the three officials braving reporter said today

he is turning to the vice president. The first goal will be stemming the flow of illegal migrant illegal migrants into the. U S in a broader context, Harris will also work on establishing a strategic partnership with the central american countries based on respect and shared values. The work will be conducted with the understanding that these countries are our friends and our neighbours. They are members of our shared community, the Americas and within the western hemisphere, one official said Harris spoke Wednesday morning with Ricardo, Zoo, Ninja, the state departments, special envoy to the northern triangle zone, younger zoo, Niggah and other top border officials. I'm trauma best brown site. Earlier this week for Mexico and plan to go on to Guatemala with the goal of addressing local problems feeling the migration north, they include lacks responses to the covered pandemic. Rapid crime, as well as the after effects of two hurricanes that blue to the region, the by administration had discussed increased aid to address some of these root concerns the bottom line. The people of an

A triangle triangle certainly deserve to experience freedom, opportunity, opportunity and able able to access with The northern triangle, one official, told reporters: they should have to come to the u to S, to seek that freedom and opportunity, and that's what working be working towards tackle our local corruption and ways to improve local economies on the surface is a good thing. It is if commonly heiresses, effectively going to reinstate much trump era policies which stem the flow of illegal immigrants and these caravans. It is a good thing. I will cross my fingers and give them credit for this so far, but I'm not entirely convinced. We will ultimately get something good with Biden's sweeping reforms. And putting Harrison charge. The crisis recently commonly Harris was slammed for last thing in the face of reporters when they asked her. If she would visit the border, she just busted out laughing. Why two extremely inappropriate? What about the suffering of the border was funny to this woman

When they said, Madam vice president, will you be visiting the border? She just starts laughing and she said obviously not today. I dont get it and that worries me. She either doesn't care about the suffering or she doesn't take it seriously at all, and the reason why I don't think she will actually enact many of these policies that will stem the flow of illegal immigrants coming into the US or coming to the border. The very least is well because of this from Newsweek August TH, two thousand and twenty commonly Harris more liberal than Bernie Sanders Senate record analysis shows us right now on the clarify this. For you, there are not saying that Kamel Harris is further left of Bernie. What they're saying is she refuses to compromise in any way with Republicans Bernie Sanders, while he is ideologically far left further left, Uncommonly Harris was at least willing to

seed to Republicans on certain issues, which means the bills that he was involved and supported and voted on. Word not so far left Kamel Harris the furthest left, you'll, see Newsweek, stated democratic presidential nominee, Joe Biden Spic for VP running mate, common Harris, was ranked as being more liberal than Bernie Sanders. The government watchdog site Gov track. Not? U S, rent, all one hundred? U S! Senators with an idea. I d Ology score scores basin, each senators legislative Havre, namely how similar the pattern of bills and resolutions they cosponsor are two other members of Congress. Gov track gave there's an ideology, score of zero point: zero to an era.

Score of zero point: zero zero. Together, they ranked as the most liberal members of the Senate. The websites had Harris joined by partisan bills, the least often compared to set a Democrats of the four hundred seventy one bills that airs cosponsor. Fifteen percent were introduced by a legislator. Who was not a Democrat. The website said what this means is. She is not likely going to compromise with Republicans, not that she's far left now Biden has said no deportations and the first hundred days he lost that Fight Biden did say: do you no more tore him on unmeaning deportations and decriminalizing border crossings, and things like that, especially during debates commonly Harris likely will pursue Joe Buttons agenda and may result in her refusing to cooperate with Republicans

Now what does all lead? What this this is where at was where I get worried, where the story from vocs outcome- and they say the republican revolt against democracy, explained in thirteen charts in one of their graphs. They say from a CBS News, pull republican seed Democrat as something worse than mere rivals. Republicans view. Fifty seven percent of Republicans say the Democrats are enemies. Forty three percent say: opposition among Democrats inverted forty, one percent presidency, Republicans as enemies. Now you may be saying without the majority right. So

Republicans the majority see Democrats as enemies, but not the Democrats. It doesn't matter, it's still forty one percent of Democrats in Republicans as enemies and fifty seven percent of Republicans. Seeing Democrats as enemies republicans dislike compromised, yup, more problems. Now you can argue that this is liberal bias and these polls are not correct. It doesn't matter what matters is we all can recognize to a certain degree. There is a conflict between the Democrats and the Republicans Zach Goldberg tweeted between two thousand and sixteen and two thousand and twenty white liberals became slightly, but significantly less likely to say that political violence is not at all justified. While white conservatives became significantly more likely to give this response, there's a difference here and the difference is republican as a party Democrat as a party and here individuals who are conservative or liberal,

noting this singles out white individuals, particular specifically. What they're basically saying people were asked. Is political violence acceptable and eighty seven point, sixty four of white conservative said not at all today dozen two thousand and sixteen ninety four point, eighty nine say not at all which means over the past four years. More Conservatives have embraced nonviolence, however, among white liberals less said not at all in twenty sixteen white liberals. At eighty six point: nine three meeting more: liberals were likely to liberals were more likely to support violence and Republicans by a small amount in twenty twenty. That number goes down to eighty one point: eight two remarkable Interestingly and twenty sixteen white moderates were the most likely to say: that's. Political violence is not at all acceptable and it makes sense to me in twenty twenty that number dropped to eighty five points:

seven. What this means we are seeing hyper polarization we are seeing an escalation among people who believe they are entitled to use violence, while among all white conservatives, this poll shows that they're less likely to support political violence. They more likely to say it's not at all justified according to a poll from CBS Republicans, are more likely to view Democrats as enemies. Perhaps that means they won't get physically violent with enemies, but they do see them as enemies among the far left and liberals, while they may not view Trump supporters as enemies outright. Those that do are more likely to support the use of violence and assess making turn when we see things checked visit. This is tweet Projector Sobek says Navy Extremism training today shut down sailor who ass my auntie Fabio on rights and radical Islam. Jack was sober, tweeted out a message somewhat too, so that they were going through the military, anti extremism training,

everytime. I try to bring a black lives matter, Anti thought they were. They were struck down, say no, no, no! It's out what it's about. The military was being told, conservatives were the bad guys. So now I hope you understand what has me worried when I tried talking to people of the potential for hot civil conflict, some sort they always poohpooh it and they are now as wrong. It's never gonna happen, but that's a podcast called it can happen here and it can. It's not gonna. Look like what you think it will look like, but it's happening. Many people hold me all the government is too is to resilient they'll they'll. Never you know it's, it's not to get woke they're, not not to do these things they're not going to confiscate weapons, what happens when the military is being trained, as they are now to view conservatives the Gadsden flag as extremism, that's been report, another stories as well and what happens in their told to accept that Anti VON blacklist matter riots are peaceful protests. What happens then, when you a constitute a law abiding citizens expressing your constitutional right?

gets a visit from a police officer or some one in the military. For some reason. National Guard maybe- and they believe fringe far left, woke ideology. Yeah, they'll VI Let your rights, because your extremist already the national sick, that nationals pretty apparatus is getting involved in domestic policy, which is strange because they're supposed to be protecting us from foreign adversaries, not from not an that's what we spying in violation of the fourth amendment, but here we go so this is what has me worried Joe Buttons plan for a sweeping overhaul democrats realizing they have a very small window. They just narrowly got enough power to dramatically make changes to this country. Even if half the country oppose it, they will do it and maybe they're hoping that this other half that they have the country will mostly just

be lethargic. I don't think so. I think it's only going to make things worse. I think you're going to find a lot of people deciding that they've had enough. There's already creepy talk about the country breaking apart and peaceful divorce, and I think that would just greatly benefit China But I suppose doesn't matter all that much because people are just going to think people are just going to get angry and they're gonna, say up for themselves, and they decided to stand up for themselves and much. Should we might say we want a peaceful resolution. We want this country to find unity. Joe Biden could do that but instead he's going to go hard core, hyper, partisan and that's gonna make people go nuts. I live at their necks segments coming up at eight the imo right Youtube com slashed him cast, I all relative live show. We have recession. We have guessed so make sure you check it out and weaving.

Make your comments. So it'll be fun. You can super chat, that's that's a Youtube com. Tim cast eight pm and we will see you all there. For there are several days, twitter has been inundated with nonsensical an inane statements about gun, control and guns and what people need and what they dont need and its remarkable that comes, People who know literally nothing about guns, I'm not going to pretend to be a gun experts, I'm far from it, I'm just a due to bought some guns last year, but Oh, do you learn a lot when you actually try to buy a gun, go to the range and get some basic training I've taken? Some people to the range and I've given them some basic instruction and firearms and its remarkable how many people have their opinions change them? there actually, given basic instruction like we went to an actual shooting range sat down, had a guy Lesson that you have to do it when you go to many ranges, if you're not like a member or whatever you have to do at least one time explaining proper gun safety, then

people actually go into that range and fire there like. While it didn't realize- and that's just shooting the gun, the first time for people to actually go to restore wow. There was a viral story that I covered. Where a lot rural journalist. What to what I think was Walmart trying to buy some guns and was shocked that she could not have surely body the guns. It's amazing will Joe Biden wants to pet wants Congress to pass a law banning assault weapons, we're going to talk about what that means, because it means nothing, but we also have the usual figures: individuals, like David Hog, he tweeted out that it should not be easier to buy an AR fifteen than it is to vote. Okay, I'm down the only problem, it's harder to buy an AR fifteen than it is to vote. So we'll get into all that you a bit about what Biden is talking about calling for these new laws, but the first thing I'll just say: is these people don't seem to really

Is that when you want to buy a gun, you have to do to get background check now in some circumstances, in some places private sale of firearms. Loud, but let me tell you about how I voted last year than envelope and a male filled it out, put it back in the mailbox I voted. I wish it were that easy. Even we are trying to by a gun from someone else, as usual, usually reasonable precautions. These individuals take typically in many states that do allow the private transfer of guns you have to. No, the individual is legally allowed by the gun. Otherwise, you are committing a felony, in which case they put it on you to make sure you're not selling a gun to someone who's, bad and I'll point out the obvious. We have a background check system you can go in and they background check you if that doesn't work. What are you proposing? Because you are not stopping the tide in this revolution? Three d printed guns are heat

There is nothing you can do about it. What do you do ban three printers? Well, I want to show you how I loved hung about guns these days. Let me show you: some guns polemic talk about what politico saying what but Joe Biden sang, but in calls for federal assault, weapons ban after bolder shooting. The president has also urged the Senate to take up a pair of gun reform bills recently passed by the house of which I think go a little bit overboard. But does it there's a good argument? Do we made earlier that I really do think we have presented jawbone on Tuesday, called for a federal assault, weapons ban and strengthen and strengthened background checks for firearm sales in the aftermath of a deadly supermarket, shooting in Boulder Colorado hoisting. The contentious issue of gun reform among the White House, his top legislative priorities, interesting that we have to

events happening in Chicago almost every weekend? It's only now they're bringing up these stories when we have these bills passing the house and making the way to the Senate. I think it's just people in the media are that they ignore stories until it benefits and that's the reality. The truth is unfortunately gun. Violence is real, it's real happens all the time, and there certain tragedies and atrocities that we ve just seen recently, but man just Google search it and you'll. About all these different places. You never knew its remarkable to me that liberals, dont know or care about these other stories. That probably would still benefit their cause. Little care the media focuses on what will shock and scare white, suburban I'd, progressives, Assain remarks delivered from the state, dining room and in any of the executive mansion bite. It demanded the Senate quickly. Take action on two bills passed earlier this month by the house, which would expand background checks and closed the so called Charleston loophole

But the president went further, it's not a loophole. This is the stupidest thing loopholes. What call basically saying for the most part when it comes to loophole, is that some states allow the private transfer of firearms that, when you firearms, if you privately sell and you sell to a person who was not allowed to have. It is going to follow me. It's already illegal. Ok, you can't do it, so you need to take those take those active measures. What's the difference between that, I suppose and the national interest criminal check system going through an fellow or store. I suppose the idea is then the F b I get a chance to review the individual, but if you take regional precautions tool committing a crime. Transferring up into someone who is, you know shouldn't have one. I suppose the argument, then, is that people trust the government more than a private individual. To do the background check. Okay, I understand that it's still not a loophole. It's just not a law on the books, so you shouldn't

call it a loophole. They do that to make it seem, like people are getting away with something. Instead of saying, we propose new legislation that would change The way private sales happen in places like West Virginia and Wyoming. They say it's a loophole because they want to create this idea that it's all ready the standard that you can't do this, but you can quote what we're still waiting for more information about this weapon in boulder. I dont need to wait another minute, let alone an hour to take common sense steps that will save lives in the future and to urge my colleagues in the house and send it to act. We can ban assault, weapons and high capacity magazine. In this country, once again I got that done when I was a senator it passed. It was the law for the longest time in it brought down these tragic events. We should do it again. Now. That's not true! That's a lie. The Washington Post has fact

Joe Biden's claims. They say fact. Checker analysis Biden's claim that nine ninety four assault weapon brought down mass shootings, the facts. They say a two thousand and four study from the Justice Department found the band's impact on gun. Violence was mixed at best because of exemptions written in the law. If the ban were renewed, the effects on done vines are likely to be small at best and perhaps too all for reliable measurement report said that assault weapons were airily used in gun crimes, but suggested that if the law remained in place, it might have a bigger impact, sure I'll point something out. The problem we have is that these high profile individuals, people like David Hogg, David Hogg, is a kid man. He doesn't know what he's talking about. Stop getting your policy positions from kids, but these democrat types, these establishment, authoritarian, liberal types, they're, authoritarian right by the way, not leftists, don't know anything about the law and they're praising. We should have more young people like him if you're getting your information from a kid who doesn't

Oh what what a gun is, don't be surprised when you're laws don't work, so I ll tell you right now: should anyone care if they ban outright a our fifteen year? If you own it s, I was a they grandfather. I understand people be mad, but I'll tell you this. It wouldn't do a thing why there are other kinds of guns. There are many other kinds of guns, and it would take only a few minutes for someone to modify and our fifteen's internal mechanisms to create a new kind of gun, they could call the or a fifteen or whatever, and it would be exempt. That's the problem. The cat is out of the bag, three printing homes, Cnc machines. You can't do anything about it, not to mention your laws or me Nicholas so Joe Biden is wrong? He wants executive action must play game, my friends, what show ya mean you probably already seen before, welcome to a meme about gun control.

What you you see on the screen and for those I'll describe describe it. It says at the top. This is a one ten, twenty two: it is a wood stock, a wooden stock rifle and then under it. It says this is a Ruger one thousand and twenty two it looks relatively different. This one appears to have a polymer stock in frame, but it also has a rifle grip and stock below this. It says This is a router ten, twenty two, it's the exact same gun only this one has a magazine in it for effect the rifle on the bottom, in the middle of it up there all the exact same gun, they can take the exact same magazines and the bottom. It says your fear of black stocks does not

change the fact that they are all the same firearm and they are. But let me tell you something which weapon would fall under the law as an assault weapon, the one on the bottom, but guess what they're all the same gun now hold on? What is assault weapon mean it changes from state to state. I dont think the router ten twenty two in the bottom, with the pistol grit and magazine in it, would constitute an assault rifle in places like New Jersey, which is one of the worst states. Forgot, foot down laws in the country, but all you have to do is at a folding stock which allows for easier storage, and then it becomes an assault weapon, the same weapon that can be carried around, that's the same barrel length effectively and each and every one of these guns can take the same magazine. But one becomes an assault Levin because of the pistol grip, its its remarkable, how

much of this doesn't make a whole lot of sense before before you. I show another image, my friends, this is an M one, a it is a wooden rifle and if you show this to the average person of the crowd are actually did this they'll tell you that it's a hunting rifle this. My friends is legally and assault weapon in Maryland. I don't know if fires three hundred and eight. I actually think this might be chambered for seven hundred and sixty two by fifty one, NATO, which is effectively the same thing as a three hundred and eight but everybody. Stickler, I've had some people say: dont use three await and seven six to its own chamber for that pressure. Although it is functional interchangeable, then about people say I you're fine go have do it. Some people say don't risk breaking your weapon, ok, fine chamber for seven six, two by fifty one, whatever get your advice from your people. The point as this is an assault weapon this right here, literally with with it with a ten round magazine and iron sites, effectively something you would see from like world war to accept that use them one ground which had a clip, not a magazine

this is the assault weapon, my friends, the scar. Twenty s is not what you are saying now images, Google search scar, twenty ass, you can see a guy's got a very large scope on it, and this also fire with this one fires three away, so we can handle higher pressure but effectively the same round this is not the assault weapon. Can you explain this to me why the essentially archaic you know: seven, six, two rifle is an assault weapon and this one isn't. It defies logic and reason. So here's the point you want to ban air fifteen. I roll my eyes. A lot of people already have the weapons you'd have to confiscate them. That's never going to happen. It would be impossible, and Someone would just invent something with a different internal mechanism and there you go it's no longer an AR fifteen. I mean the vectors vectors exist and they use a different internal components. So it's just outright meaningless. Now, let's talk about voting, my friends David Hog. He tweeted,

It should not be easier to buy in our fifteen than it is to vote. Ok. When I voted dimension, I got a piece of peace of mail in my mailbox. That's all I never asked for it just showed up one day and I took it and I felt it out as per the rules and I melded beckoned and I was done when you would like to buy a weapon in almost every circumstance you wanna buy online. Ok go to a certain website. There is a variety of websites and find open. You want pay for it, submit your choice of f. I fell to receive the weapon. You'll then get notified of the shipment you'll get notified. What by by your store when they got it, you'll show up you'll fill out a background check form under penalty of, I believe, is under penalty of perjury,

saying that you're a US citizen, you have to check a whole bunch of things saying that you know you're, not a criminal you're, not a following. Then they run it through the system. Then you will either get cleared because the FBI literally checks this. They send it to them, and the FBI is there going through these background, checking you FBI literally looking at your name. Some people get researched so often they'll see your name they'll. Do a quick search and say this person seems to be a law abiding system. We have nothing on file. Whatever find cleared, you're good to go, you can buy your weapon, it happens very quickly. It's called next the national instant criminal check system. If you are not a criminal and you have no history, what would a background check find even in five,

Is it doesn't change anything? In fact, some people will be researched what that means, as you have to wait about twenty minutes, while the FBI Google's your name or whatever and looks a deer background checks, a bunch of databases to see. If you are sent you and you might be, you might be- there might be some of the same name. You might have some some. You know petty offences like tickets are jaywalking, something like that and they'll they'll research. You and you sit around the store and you're. I got gotta wait and then sometimes, when you're getting researched, they come back over twenty minutes and say you've been delayed. We'll call you back when you're cleared and then you leave and then five days later, you'll get a phone call and they'll say yes or no, that's all ready how it works. So let me clarify most of you probably know this, because if you're gonna enthusiasts and you have guns what their advocating for in terms of background checks already exists

if you have a history of mental illness or some other defect, you have to admit to it. If you dont York committing a crime. Now, if you, if you commit a crime and you submit it and they do the background check. On you and find that you lied. Congratulations, you've committed a crime. You will be denied to purchase your firearm. There is, however, I think, there's a I don't know if it's three or five days, but there is a deadline that the FBI, I think is the FBI has, if they are researching can you and they don't complete the process than you are legally allowed to pick up your gun, because you need to you reasonably allowed to bear arms, we have a constitution, but the system is already in place. So let's talk about David Haug is saying a magic. If, in order to vote, you have to fill out a criminal background check that could take up to five days. Imagine if you need an eye de from your state, proving you live where you're, not just your name and imagine if you're definitive forms signing a sworn affidavit, who

war, that you're a U S, citizen, providing yourselves security, number and all the stuff. In order to vote. That's right: it is easier to vote than to buy a gun which brings me to Matt Walsh, who counters the point from David Haug met while says gun ownership is a more important right. Then voting voting is not really a human right at all, but a privilege that should be reserved for those who are qualified to do it properly, but it should be easier to buy a gun, then vote, but it isn't. I have, I somewhat agree with met Walsh. I believe that voting should be right. I am not one of look. I understand there needs to be some kind of civic engagement invites in voting we catches have random people showing up. There has to be something tied voting and I think it's fairly simple when you rush to devote your you, you ve got me no jury duty as a potential thing and me we have the right to vote. I really do I believe in a institutional public with democratic institutions. I am not a fan of this idea that only wealthy lie.

The owners can vote. I do think some restrictions on voting are absolutely fine. Voter Idee, for instance, come on. We need some security, it approval you are and we want to prove. You know that you live somewhere and I also believe there should be a time limit, like you can't vote if you just move somewhere within three months, and I think the reason for that is voting locally, I mean footing federally should be allowed to vote no matter what If you move somewhere and then you ve got a local ordinances, you could dramatically alter the community for everybody else, and you have no ties to the community. That's bad! So I'm fine with with some restrictions, but I do believe voting is right. I don't necessarily believe that it should be easier to buy a gun, then vote. But I understand the point because I tell you this: what good is the right to vote if you have

a right to defend yourself. That's it is a remarkable argument from the authoritarian right. You know. Many of these parkland kids are authoritarian right, not like far right, all traditional less but they're, not on the left there. They. These are not people advocating for Social their literally just advocating for the status quo and the seizure of people's rights. So sorry, the authoritarian left remarkably programme, the libertarian left pro gun, libertarian right programme authoritarian right now pro gun and that's many in the Democratic Party, and I literally mean that now I'll tell you this. When we talk about the right to bear arms to protect yourselves from enemies, both foreign and domestic as well, you know like criminals. What we hear from any of these Democrats is: oh yeah, like you're, ever going to go up against the US government, No. Nobody wants to go up against US government when the police show up at your house, you you do it. The cops say and we recognize

is that in a civil society, police need to be able to make arrests when the National Guard is deployed in an emergency. Guess what? you do what the National Guard Sazen ok get out here is that are otherwise. Why? Because we believe in this country now there are issues especially right now in the culture but for the most part we understand there is a process for a redress of grievances. Many are frustrated that process isn't being it's not easy, but I do think the lawsuits going to the Supreme Court tend to work. Not always it's an imperfect system, but it's still pretty good I'll, throw it back to the World WAR Ii era, where you had the office of censorship, loose lips, sink ships. Okay, many people recognized that there were reasonable restrictions on our freedom of speech and things we could do when we were in a major crisis. So that means cops are up to your house so long as it's legal and they have a warrant. You know you will buy the law. In fact, even if- and this is a tough one for a lot of people, if the cop shop- your house, I'm not

breaking the law, you must, and this is the most important part you must of the two as reasonably as possible- cooperate, because if you want to win and illegal battle and have that reaches of grievances, you can't give them any excuses. Copsewood your house, as you're under arrest, you can say for what you have a warrant. You know call your lawyer and then you win. When you remain calm, it could jam you up, it could be annoying. It could be a violation of your rights, but you don't win by screaming and yelling and fighting with cops. That's not how it works. It's tough! It really is. There are a lot of people who think they're going to be gungho charging the streets and taken

their government, whatever it sorry is just not how it works. We are country of three to thirty million people. There's got to be a democratic process involved and I think it's the key to victory is persuasion. That's the air over in convincing people that you were right. That means filming the police not screaming and yelling, making reasonable statements, and you know. However, I will also point out the fact that people have guns means the cops, aren't going to kick your door in and beat your your your children to death and drag them out of your home. I don't know what these people you know who are like, I mention the Vietcong or the Taliban, for instance that were able to hold back the? U S military with, but rifles there. Like so you're saying you know, Trop supporters in and you know they're gonna run out in the streets and act like the Taliban and unlike no I'm saying that in

countries where people dont have the right to defend themselves, government agents commit crimes against them and studied about the government is about some lunatic who wants to come in and steal your stuff. Anybody who wants to commit a crime now without the right to defend yourself, you would see your rights completely revoked and eroded they become meaningless, and that's what I think Matt Walsh is saying about the right device. But now he says it's a privilege. I disagree on their part, but I understand what he says: got ownership is more important than voting. That may be. Only in this sense, at least in my opinion, that if you don't have the right to bear arms, your government and corporations can do whatever they want, because they fear no one. They fear nothing. I'm not a fan of that. I dont think you are going to see

american citizens marching the streets with guns, informing you know, factions and a great civil war. Anything like that. I think we are seeing a political war and there's attempts to seize power, but at the american people did not have firearms than criminal actors and rogue agent to the government. Do what they want with impunity, they'd storm into your house, and they do it ever. They want stuck my browser Taylor. Let's talk about Brianna tell you talk about the right to bear arms broke, tellers, boyfriend was had had a legal firearm and the police did not enter the home because they were worried about it and they say you know that they broke the door and they got shot at one cop got hit two difficult situation, but think about?

would have happened. If these people did not have the right to bear arms, I suppose the left would argue and everyone will be alive. I doubt it. I think they would have broken into her home and all of the organs made by the left is that the cops would just kick their way in with impunity and no fear, and they would do it to anyone at any point. For any reason, there needs to be a balance of power. When a government went when it when the people fear their government there's tyranny, and when the government fears there there's their people their freedom is one of the famous quotes I don't think anybody should be shitting at cops or anything like that, but I do think police need to recognize why you have to knock and get a warrant and do the job right, because people in this country are allowed to defend themselves and guess what, when this dude rat Taylors boyfriend shot a cop, he literally shot a cop. The charges against him were dropped. He won why? Because they kicked the door in and he was allowed to defend himself. It's amazing

Isn't it? That's that's the point on I'll bring up all these leftists when they say you know what it. What do you need guns? What about yourself from the government to say no black lives matter? Trans rights, you think cops are bad. Think they're clan members. You sing that song from March against the machine. Some of those who run forces are the saying that burn crosses you that's. Why? Because you think the cops are white supremacist, and then you think that these people should not be allowed to protect themselves from white supremacist unit. I tweeted I tweeted. We need all marginalized people in order in order to end might supremacy marginalized. People must be armed to the teeth and I'm not even kidding white supremacy is a bad thing. Whites premises are bad. You know especially violent once they want a press somebody they want to be. Someone they want to be bigoted. They want to violate someone else's rights. I don't care what you, what you believe who you love, how you want to dress, how identify you have a right to bodily autonomy and to live your life freely and peacefully,

and if somebody wants to take away from you you, by force with violence, you have a right to defend yourself. So I tweeted out the Trans flag with a rifle on it, and I said this under no pretext shall the right to keep and bear arms be infringed that means. Karl Marx quote under no pretext should ammunition in arms, be surrendered that the workers should frustrate this by force, if necessary. That's though the leftist say under no pretext the constitution says the right to keep in bear arms shall not be infringed. I just put them together. You know why I don't care if you're a leftist. I don't care if you're a right winger. What however, as long as we all agree, the right to cuban Baron shall not be infringed under no pretext. Then we're good. It's the authoritarian right corporate democrat types that are all about banning the stuff and guess what So are we establish Republicans, they just say: well, it is reasonable. Now, it's not reasonable, but only with their next

he's comin up at one p m on this channel. Thanks rang out- and I will see you all them- reparations have begun here in the: U S outright and overtly called reparations. Now many people disagree with the idea, but there is an actual: are you made about whether or not the United States government should pay reparations to those who are descendants of slaves. It's it's a real argument. Now many people have come out against at many people come up for it and one of the much of the arguments for it are that historical racism. And lack of access to resources has resulted in historical poverty and by providing reparations to descendants of slaves, namely black families. We can help nor

Alize society and end some of these impoverished areas. By giving resources to these families. I actually think there is a decent argument to be made here. The problem is, we had a civil rights era, we fought for equality and now need to recognize that there is historical wealth affecting people of all races and that by providing people of one race with reparations, I don't think will actually solve the problem. We will still have impoverished individuals of particular races, which brings me to the next point. Now again, I'm actually not opposed to the idea of reparations. I am not I'm not a big fan of it. I don't completely agree with it

I just think there is a logical argument we made and I think it's fair to say: maybe it won't work personally. The reason why I lean against these ideas is because I think there are poor white people as well, and at this point we solve the problem of poverty by focusing on class and not race, and I recognise that there is historical racism which has tat which is tied to poverty, so that interesting argument, then, because if the left truly believes that black families and families of color variety of marginalized peoples are disproportionately affected by racism. Well, then a class based solution would disproportionately benefit them. You just wouldn't leave behind

many poor people. The problem with this is that we have moved beyond any claim of reparations. We are now entering into just anti white government payments. Oakland launches guaranteed pay plan for low income people. What the Associated press leaves out is that this is for low income families of color. That's right. This is not reparations. It's a guaranteed income program that just doesn't give white people guarantee income, its operations, because low income, families of color I mean that could be an asian family could be latino family. I don't they. There's a conversation around providing operations to Letty knows it's about the sentence of black families or those, I'm sorry. Isn't it black Emily's descendants of those who were enslaved, we're seeing the overt reparations happen and Evanston, and I think this segment is important, because White Americans, namely sub suburban night families, are in for a very rude away.

Getting last night on the team cast iron podcast, we hosted Jody Shaw, He is a white liberal woman. She was a staffer at Psmith College is in North Hampton Massachusetts. I believe it's in Northampton. Well, she said, over time there were these conversations around diversity, inclusive iii and equity, and it felt weird you know being criticized: is or demeaned based on your right when they say white people are bad and white people had to do these things, but that she thought it was normal. You know, white people are supposed to complain about the stuff, but then actually I've got so intense and so bad. She was forced to file a complaint about Rachel. This criminal, and against our for being white, and there is this default position. Many

white liberals have had for a long time where they dont feel they have the right to complain about racial discrimination. But this goes back decades. The idea is rooted in a time when white people worthy o overwhelming majority now they're, just a strong, majority between sixty six and seventy percent, but there was a time when it was eighty or ninety percent, and so the idea was they didn't have all that much to complain about. For the most part, because why should they care if a small minority of individuals is criticizing them. Things are different today when, in many cities it's actually not the case that why people make up the majority, at least in some cities and in several institutions it doesn't matter what your race is. They will racially discriminate against you now. That's a violation of the nineteen sixty four civil rights ACT, but, as we start to see things like reparations, there's going to be what the left has been calling for a white racial awakening. Now I personally don't think that

that's a good thing. I think we should all recognise where humans were. Americans, before anything else and we lived together, we share this beautiful and amazing country with a beautiful, an amazing constitution, but something is happening Jodi Shaw's story is effectively what many white nationalists want to happen. Now get out imputing the honor of Joey, I think she's she's, red and she's, a regular liberal individual, who just realized that she was being held back through no fault of her own, simply on the basis of race that cannot. The accepted now white nationalist seek to capitalize on this anger and rage to drum up support for their identitarian policies, but I don't care whether you're a white identitarian or an anti white identitarian. I think I'd into is wrong and I think this country, the great american melting pot, brings many different people of cultures and race together

the problem now is when you hear stories about people saying they finally realised that they were being discussed it against, you will have white racial awakening, it's what white supremacist are hoping for and what I've been warning about. You see reparations for black Residence and Evanston. Honestly, not a big deal to me like I said: I'm not opposed to it. For the most part, although I lean against it, because I dont think it's actually an assault on these problems, but localised reparations maybe makes sense. They got it this way. In Evanston Illinois, you will have like the grand child of a you know of a family that faced racial discrimination, racial covenants, red lining block busting in things

like that they will provide access to loans or a reasonable way to purchase a home in a better neighbourhood to help solve the problem of the poverty. That's created historically from you know from these these laws, those aren't familiar Chicago was the that's it we're the phrase red lining comes from its where they basically would not sell to black families. I certainly think remnants of block, busting and red lining. Have created and contributed to historical racism, however, are we really going to solve that problem these days, when it's already You got to do these things, so Finally I say I dont think re space reparation solve that problem, but here's it's happening in Evanston annoy Illinois and PR reports the city of Evanston, will make reparations available to eligible black residence for what it describes as harm caused by discriminatory housing policies and practices and inaction on the cities. Citys part, the programme is believed to be the first of its kind in the U S and is seen by advocates as a potential

national model. Evanston City Council voted eight to one on Monday to approve the local reparations restored, a housing program, an official confirmed to NPR over email. It will grant qualifying households up to twenty five thousand dollars for down payments or home repairs according to the city, and the end is the first initiative of a city reparations fund that was established in two thousand and nineteen. So, let's stop like. I said. I don't think this is the solution, but I will point out some benefits and some positive argument. I suppose, if the city of Evanston, just the city of Evanston votes, to allocate their taxes this way, I don't care what Evanston does I don't live there? If this is what they think is right, then so be it, and if the resource is being provided are focused primarily, they must be used in specific ways like down payments for how or repairs. Actually

really kind of like the idea. You have dilapidated homes. You have dilapidated neighborhoods. If we can repair this, I'm in favour of it, you don't you take a look at New York City, for instance the of the Upper West side extremely wealthy, while the way taxes work is that they naturally just pay more than taxes because they have more money. It's percentage wise, it's the same for most people with New York City's income tax, but then they can use these taxes to repair poor areas that don't have as much because we as a country as a community, are only strong as our weakest link. So if the city decides to do it I'm out of and not necessarily an agreement. Let it let it limit. Let me slowdown in just gonna break this down the main point and try to get across the segment reparations are not where it ends, as I pointed out from the ape historic, its eventual going to be we're just going to print money and give it to people who aren't white and the problem. I have as I like, the idea of helping the poor, don't like the idea of having it based on

I think there are going to be many impoverished people in Evanston who may be white or mixed race. Families who will not be eligible for this simply because their the wrong race- and I don't like it- I can understand that the trying to rectify past racism, but you don't solve the problem of racism with more racism. Of course, you ask Ebro Ex Kennedy who wants everyone to be racist and segregated than you do, and that seems to be with the left is focusing on and that's what they will get. They say. The program is a step towards revitalizing: preserving and stabilizing black african american owner occupied homes in Evanston, increasing home ownership and building the wealth of black african american residents, building intergenerational equity, young black and african american residents, and improving the retention rate of black and african american homeowners in the city of Evanston November, two thousand and nineteen. In November, two nineteen, the City council, established a reparations fund to support initiatives addressing historical wealth and opportunity gaps for black residents to be funded,

by the first ten million dollars in revenue from the city's tax on the sale of recreational marijuana. The housing program is initially budgeted at four hundred thousand dollars. I'm fine with this check it out. If you live in Evanston and you have a house, your taxes aren't going to the reparations your income tax not going to the reparations. You know it is the people who are buying pot. I don't think they care either. So you buy pot, you pay a tax and that tax goes reparations. Fine. If you don't want to pay that tax and contribute, don't buy pot, and I kind of feel like a lot of people who don't want to contribute to this- probably wouldn't buy pot either. However, I do recognize still the problems of race based programs, which brings me to where it ultimately ends up. The AP reports. The mayor of Oakland California, on Tuesday, announced a privately funded program that will give low income families of color five hundred dollars per month, with no room

rules on how they can spend it. The programme is the latest experiment with a guaranteed income and idea. Giving poor people are set amount of money each month helps ease the stresses of poverty that often lead to poor health, while hindering their ability to find full time work. Sorry, you you're wrong AP notice how they keep saying poor people, poor people, poor people, that's the manipulation, that's the lie there saying low income families of color. So why not low income white families? No, you get to suffer a basin, the color of your skin or your ancestry. Although I suppose most people might figure out, they can problems it identifies. However, they want, and

gain access to these programs as well. You see this is not reparations. This is literally just stripping away the resources from everyone to allocate towards people based on race. This is going to make racism worse, and so I reference the problem here and I reference the Jodi Shaw story to explain the issue of why it's bad that there will be a white racial awakening. Let me tell you, what's going to happen as more and more liberals are to question this low income. Liberals, for instance, or like I can't pay my bills and I don't get money because I'm white, that's it! You know that there could be a wealthy. You know black family, that people say deserves operation, Why should we be focusing on you know? Well, Smith's family are Oprah as oppressed when their extremely wealthy, so these ideas ultimately going dangerous directions now mind delighted, and this is for low income families, but what

happens when white individuals, heavy racial awakening and that's what they're calling for in Sacramento took us up. This is in Sacramento Wherewith on China's Sacrament California. What's gonna be happening in Oakland in Sacramento? That's where the schools are doing, though, affinity groups, so that way Students can form their own groups and talk about their shared history and their feelings and have a white racial awakening. As I have often pointed out, do you think if you take it, our group of white people and then put him in a room and having talk which other other shared history, with the belief that they will just art hating themselves. Some might, but I don't think so. I think every every form of life wants to fight for Sir and so, when you look at a story like Jody Shaw's at Psmith College, she stood up for us off its had stopped making this about race. I don't feel comfortable you're, making a hostile work environment criticising attacking now Jody is a smart. More liberal minded

individual waking up to the realities? That is the critical race theory and the threats posed by these racist policies, but she's not racist? What happens when you do this and people have an awakening and then realize they all racist? What happens when racists and counter the stuff? You know Quite simply, they're gonna just decide to form a racial identity group based on being white and they're, going to use their collective majoritarian power to vote for things they want. California had a proposition that would have removed the civil rights provision from their constitution. It was defeated and I'm glad it was, but if it was removed theoretically, then public institutions in California would have the right to discriminate based on race, and so I asked my Russia, friends, do you know what the percentage that the racial demographic break up in California is mostly what do things like? Seventy percent white so

You look at these smaller cities and you know central enough in California, where their mostly white. Do you think that they are going to use the new found powers to discrimination on the basis of race to harm themselves? Why would they do that I asked my friend: do you think that these conservative areas that are you know all white people? Do you think they would pass law? as and put up signs saying you know only why people aloud and stuff like that, the progressive seem a thing. So am I progressive friends? Don't I said so? Why would you advocate for this? Then it will have a good answer now. Ultimately, I dont think can serve as would do that because I think these ideas have long since faded. It is actually the left that want segregation. It is white progressives calling for segregation and calling for the expansion of this policy

Don't take my word for it: here's a story from CNN to asian american senators back off threat to oppose bye nominees. After does agrees to add senior aapi advisor, seen in reports, senators, Tammy, Duckworth and Mazie Hirono on Tuesday, backed off their threat to vote against any of President Jovan's nominees nominees who aren't minorities after going public with their anger, the cabinet lacks Asian Americans and Duckworth earlier saying she felt insulted by the White House's attempts to brush off her concerns. I got it people use identity for everything? The alt right has criticized me heavily saying that the only reason I don't understand identitarian ism is because I don't have a racial identity being mixed race, maybe they're right. The only thing I had with my friends, growing up, was that we were all Americans and that's why I like America, because I think civil rights one. I think they were right to fight for I'm glad they did

and now we have a great american melting pot and I think it's been fantastic up until the establishment, NEO liberal editorial types and far leftist started coming out, seizing power and basically tearing the country apart. I don't blame conservatives for the culture war. I in fact blame the woke leftists now there are many anti woke left us. I don't agree with them on social. Moreover, but hey look, we can argue economic policy all day and night and authoritarianism, but I think we have a serious problem with the country being torn apart by policies. Like we see from these these Democrats, you must have a mighty that the person must be minority or else no higher the best person I dont care and on part asian. I dont care just just higher the best person in Oakland. There are giving money straight cash, which means if they, if the money is printed or granted from the beautiful

that are somewhat that it deletes the buying power of everybody else more likely, though it's going to be from taxes, in which case people are going to be paying money and that money is gonna, be allocated to other people based on race. How is that going to solve the problem of racism when you create right animosity between people? It's it's not going to I think you're a lotta racists on the West Coast, and I think there are a lot of white supremacist like real ones, who will use this to gain power and it'll work

It will you're going to see people finally snapping saying they're, tired of being made fun of, in fact, many of the alt right over the past. Several years have stated this publicly. They were tired of being attacked for being white, so they found the only group that made them feel safe and wanted. There's a meme about this, where it's like a white guy minding his own business and then a diverse group starts screaming at him. These are white oppressor. He looks to his right and as a big group of white people with torches and they're. Like don't worry, you can be one of us where we appreciate you, and so he joins the torch March. That's.

But a lot of people were feeling nobody likes to be attacked by some things. I can't change, but I assure you people will do whatever they can survive when they feel threatened same as any other creature on this planet now, maybe not any other, but most other creatures try to survive. I think the problem is left as an anti terrorism, which is in government, which is happening now in front of us, which is taken by allocating tax resources, is going to create a surge in the other direction and literally happened over the past few years. It's going to result in insane policies from Democrats from governors and the President and then you're going to see white people in this country start to ask themselves questions about what the laws should be and what they want. It's almost like the Democrats figured it out The Democrats. Historically, the Party of Jim Crow, the clan slavery in the south and the civil war have always been in favour of racism.

And many people say yeah. Well, the party switched they didn't. I don't think they did. I think what actually happened is the Democrats realized. The paths of victory was subversive, not overt when they came out, they were racist. They were unpopular because people don't like racism. Even conservative Republicans mind do the first senators in this country that were black up the first politicians at federal level. I, but I believe, or Republicans Abraham Lincoln Republican now Republicans certainly have their share of racists and always have, and there were people probably would have a Democrat. The past people flock and can get a confederate flags who are public and now so there, is some blending of the parties over time. But now the Democrats are proposing policies that will ultimately just lead to white people as the majority voting

or their own interests, and there you go. What more do you expect will happen and that's it the fact that their straight giving money to low income families is, I just its. I think it's just proof that it's not about reparations its literally just about racists trying to segregate They say the reason white households in Oakland on average make about three times as much annually than black households according to the Oakland Equity index. It's all oh I'm not a legacy of the black Panther Party, the political movement, those found in Oakland Oakland, the nineteen sixties best or justification pay inequity. We have cultural issues, when I look at movies, and they say that they are going to have a blackmail lead or whatever in this new series anchor at cool actually kind of like it. I've talked to many friends, many conservatives and I've got things like the first.

Marvel movies. You had iron man white, do yet get Captain America, white dude and for White did. Do you really think that every Single Marvel movie. They're gonna make us it's gonna, be a white dude at a certain point: you're gonna get a female of color and asian lady at the mexican guy you're and have different people had lining as the main heroes in these stories. That's just unnatural com. Once so. When they come out, they announced was a change Jane. She, I think, is a new one in what was there doing and it's an asian superhero led I'm like go, I think we need it. I think we need representation and I We need our are our movies are. Are our tv shows our comic books to reflect the diverse America? The problem is, wokeness is, is they preach? They beat over that and they don't treat these people like regular people, that's not going to work. Here's what we need. You do! A movie black panther. I thought black Panther was actually fantastic seriously, because you had will conduct you had. You know too trawler this leader, who was

ethnonationalist. He was like our country is only for our people and it's like wow, and then you had the bad guy. Who was basically Hitler, who Hitler who our like our people best the it was, like looking at these two kind of awful ideologies, especially how they had come. What was their, their government was based on, ritualistic, bloodline, combat patriarchal bloodline, combat seeing that and seeing that that new ones that political debate was fantastic, even have the line where it's like a child like, if we open our borders to these other people they'll bring their problems with them. I'm like it's, really amazing thing to see that political discourse happening, and I think it important to show that even you know the king of will conduct. Understands issues of immigration similar to I would have arguments in this country. That's what we need showing people of different backgrounds and fates, religions, races showing them experiencing some

the problems that we do. The problem is a lot of the woke up. We actually getting is like they scream that white people are bad. They claim why people are the villains and that's just going to perpetuate racism. I think in the end, what really helps us come together is just watching a tv show with characters of all different backgrounds. We have a lot of commercials where there's mixed race families. I think that's fine. I really dont care. I do think there's an theirs. I got what what these commercials do is you'll have like a mixed race, family and it's all most every single commercial. Well, you'll get this conspiracy theories to think the real reason there doing it is to push an agenda, and that's just not true the real reason they do. It is they're trying to get every single demographic to buy their product. So you see a black father and he's like pouring abolish curios and then a white mother. There not doing it because they're trying to push them agenda there doing it, because there are like

we want literally every one of his country by our product and so the trying to get that much representation on the tv. I think that's fine, I think it's the ads, whatever grub good. In the end, I think we need to recognise ourselves as Americans. First, how amazing would that be people arguing about we're taxpaying Americans and were sending foreign aid for gender studies in Pakistan A as an argument. I want the pipes and flint to be fixed right. I mean that figurative, because they have been When I think about what's going on in inner cities, when I think about going on in Evanston or Chicago, I want those things to be fixed. I think at this Point of the solution is, as Americans we're gonna, take care of our own. We're going to take care of the people who are paying into the system and who are deserving of Or I think a lot of people are deserving of help. Don't get me wrong, but it's like if we are all part of this community as Americans and we're putting in resources. That means we should help the poor. That's my opinion

it means. I think we should be tackling these billionaires. Why dont much care for? Why? Should I care of Tom styles gonna pay more money that guy was free? hundreds of millions of dollars to ban guns, and then I look at these progressive left us and they say things like like the legitimate ones, not the fate corporatist. Now they believe socialism, but I don't agree with that, but they do but even the right to bear arms, and I think you know what every Trans person, every marginalized person, should be armed to the teeth. Carry around you cast you, twenty five technical shot gun load up a double out buckshot. Do it it's your right to keep and bear arms? and I don't like the idea of white supremacist, hurting or or taking away someone's rights either. I dont want them to gain power, but I think, what's happening at the establishment level is going to exacerbate that. It's almost like it's. Plan. Now, I believe in a utopian vision of America, a great amount of a great american melting pot of people of all different backgrounds who are sitting back

smoking cigars and their little rascal overweight, grill enough Food Holden. There are fifteen in whatever I'm kidding by the way, but I love the libertarian joke where its I just want my tran trans, you know get married, Franz women track gay marriage to transmit couple to build a smoke pot and shoot guns and their property in peace. Something like that. You get the point it's like those of us who are libertarian and that's, I think, the good guys. We don't care what other people do. You know mean for the most part I do if you got property and your trans, you are you are a gay married couple? Whatever you want to smoke pot, you want to mind your own business and you want to have a bunch of guns. I want you to do it. I want you to buy in Bitcoin. I want you to be able to legally smoke pot grow what you want and be left alone, and that means we had a protect. The rights of everybody, and that also means we look at projects like this in Oakland and in Evanston when they're centered around race. This is more of an authoritarian practice that will will create

ideological zealots that will result in more racism. I think people need to understand what dont tread on me means it means bro. You don't try me what trod on you? You go, do your thing and I hope you're happy and have a good day, and I think the rights that I have other rights that you deserve as well. I tweeted something about people. You know the right to to keeping and bear the right to keep barometer be infringed, and then somebody some leftist responded like sore. You basically saying using the black Panther part you should have a ton of guns and I was like yet this one hundred per cent. Yes, yes in every one of them and they showed up in Virginia to defend the right to bear arms and they were praised by conservatives into a if it gets. Libertarians and sky responded based on like yeah dude. Absolutely the Trans Committee should be armed. If you are concerned about these people being targeted by transposing bigots wanna hurt them. I think they have a right to exist and have all their rights defended.

They should have guns I'll leave it there I'll rent on this later. Maybe it's Rl Podcast, but I leave it there. You get the point. I don't think reparation is going to solve the problem. I'm not opposed to helping the poor, but focusing on race is creating more problems than it's. Solving next segment is coming up, but four p m over at Youtube COM slashed him cast as my main channel thanks hanging out, and I will see well then.