You'd think I was joking and I kind of em, but not really. For those that are living on the podcast. What I'm displaying on my screen that right now is this famous picture of Mark Zuckerberg walking through a conventions enter. The biggest smile on his face as all of the people around them are wearing virtual reality, headsets, seemingly oblivious to the real world. I wonder what they're looking at you know: you're, probably look it up. The point of this picture is too kind of convey a message. While I dont literally believe Mark Zuckerberg is to be the grand overlord. He has a disproportionate amount of power he's causing problems along with Silicon Valley right, they either he's a representation of the worst of Silicon Valley. In my opinion, I'm sure you won't be too happy with this video. Assuming you see, but we ve seen a wave of censorship. We have seen it dramatically worse with the project. Verity censorship, with my video being censored and now nay. I have a series of stories that I want to go through and talk to you about how things are going to get worse. From here. Unless something is done about big tech IDA Converse,

recently about how, in nineteen eleven, I believe I came over the neighbourhood of the oil company, both them. It was the big you know. Rockefellers oil company was broken up as an illegal monopoly. What we're seeing now is much more dangerous, because one thing to control fuel is another thing to control of thought, and Silicon Valley has that power and they're using it. So the first thing I want to do is make an egg is, is point to a very specific reason. Example of mark Zuckerberg flaunting is power and getting away with it, and then I will talk about some of the more recent ramifications from the hill Zuckerberg could be held in contempt of canadian parliament. After ignoring subpoena. I won't read the story, but they just of it. Canada wants Mark Zuckerberg and Cheryl Sandberg to explain to them some of the issues they have with the platform. Mark Zuckerberg decided not to show up. He wouldn't answer subpoena I can understand some people have argued he's, not a canadian citizen. He owes them now

Johnson is no requirement to shop. However, Mark Zuckerberg is causing massive political change and problems in their country. So, yes, he should be held accountable talk about international all day and night, but this is to show you that sure, with the? U S, we could probably take action against Silicon Valley induce thing recently. We saw Google see us and which I beg you not to get regulated, but other countries not so much so many of you may not be in the. U S, I assure you there are things your country can do. They're not doing. I dont know why we report on the story and suffers and one of the original investors and Facebook it's my understanding said. Maybe Canada should shut them down, but they don't know one. Does the politicians don't stand up to big tack? Why because they're not controlling fuel, their controlling fought. If you're a politician- and you oppose big tech, they will remove you we'll get into that. I won't get about had out of myself.

Here we go any further at over its guess. Tat come slash, doubted if you'd like to support my work, because I am continually challenging the big tech oligopoly and censorship and, of course, at some point, they're not going to like it. And I'm gonna broaching several subjects in this video which there really not gonna like. So. If you want to support my work either, No I'm still reliant on these big tat platforms, pay pal for one scary, but also crypto currency, a physical address, so you want to support me. I am not super worried about getting shot an entirely to the time will come, it will go back to the hill. I bring us they are just as an example of how Zuckerberg has flaunted his his position and his power and authority over other countries in the? U s he has touched Let's take a look at some modern examples. Firstly, our highlight is what met many of you may already be aware of big tech. Crackdown Youtube deletes project Vericourt video on Pinterest censorship, quote

I think that this is a watershed moment in the history of the first moment and big tech, that's from James O Keefe and I dont disagree for those it haven't, felt the story: Pinterest had a whistle blower provide information to avert us proving that interest was censoring conservatives there were censoring some others like Anti WAR left us, but for the most part, Bible versus Christianity, pro life, eventually and organizations were being censored? This really struck a nerve, very toss. Jimmy had their video taken down, they had their twitter. Account suspended. And then, when I commented on the story, I displayed no new information. They came for me too, it important for you to understand Facebook has absolutely taken action against individuals of political influence and that's the first step if you're out of line, they will remove you. Some people have said I'll drop will never win and twenty because of the censorship and nothing being done about it,

That's it that's to be seen wolsey it's hard to predict because tromp has alot of advantages. But the point is: if you challenge actually challenge these systems, they will shut you down and there is nothing. We can do to stop it. This morning I did a video, my second channel, about a left wing activist who was suspended from Twitter because his book had an a symbol on it that twitter didn't like. Removed their controlling what you're allowed to talk about in this circumstance journalism, actually struck inner was removed, and that means it means everything that we have set up into this point on Facebook and Twitter and on Google that has not been banned has been within what is acceptable to attack giants. Of course, faced got rid of politics of Watson and my low and Alex Jones, etc, because what they say is not acceptable. What they

It was helping Donald Trump. However, everything I've said: critical of Facebook, uncritical of Youtube and Twitter has been acceptable up until the curtain was pulled back and James O Keefe showed, without the whistle blower that they were absolutely restricting certain information. All of a sudden, then Google and Twitter said no, and they took our content. And that shows you. There really is a line that you are not allowed to cross. Look it's one thing: if someone's preaching you know hateful things and they say it's bad pr, it's another thing when you prove that they have ill intent and they are politically motivated, then they get rid of you. Well, let's move on the reason I highlight this next origin. The daily beast is to show you what is acceptable, What is the double standard? This is proof the story from the daily beast. We found the guy behind the viral drunk policy video. This is proof that some things are

Annabelle, not an acceptable, not on principle on not causing problems for the elite tech oligopoly when very toss publishes their video. They get a privacy claim. Apparently there are some individuals and that video who didn't want to be publicly known, but they took action. And they are newsworthy, involuntary public figures unfortunate that these things happen. They took action which had negative. Consequences politically motivated and now they are being thrust into the limelight. This individual in the daily be store just shared a video on Facebook, but they argue he is newsworthy. What happens? They get cheered on What are the journalists, the activists and twitter itself say: there's no privacy violation at all spine, vartos they're gone, but of course I did talk about this, why do want to move on? This is this? Is this for example, from the daily collar as to what James O Keefe was suspended for on Twitter, saying a privacy violation,

but I do want to make sure we get through this. Often go into the bigger issues now to the point of Facebook, Why? You have serious problems ahead. The stories from May third asked her card faces, shareholder vote that could force it to ban payments to far right groups. This vote is expected June. Twenty fifth, it's to come, but Mastercard is already banned. People for Their politics is already a dangerous precedent and I'm sure many of you know this would you. May ask yourself, we know about this problem is not a facebook problem, I assure you it is. Facebook is planning a new crypto currency Libra and just got some biddy and just got some pretty big guy mix of words, a pretty big backers visa,

Mastercard of Pay PAL and offer our among firms that will invest around ten million dollars each in consortium that will govern digital coin. The ability to exchange the ability to trade is paramount. First, they will restrict your ability to speak. You think using digital platforms and the activists on the left will say, but in the private platform and pave the way for massive, unaccountable tech oligopoly with no allegiance to anyone and no accountability to do these things. What do you think happens, then? When they a lot their digital coin. They ve already begun to mock monopolize the public. The public space of speech, the President on Twitter, they can remove you and you are no longer in the conversation you to Facebook. They can remove you. You are not in their conversation how many people are meeting at City Hall there conversation but who elect none huh? people, are watching tv, the rating

are collapsing. The internet is where public speeches happening and Facebook will remove you. They have removed people and now We are moving into the digital Crypto currencies space. Many peoples had crypto currency will free us. Will it what a facebook twitter visa, asked a card pay, pal, uber, Google, etc. I know Google and twitter involving just cited as apathetically one of these. Companies come together and then say you know what we have now created massive incentives. To purchase something perhaps, but there are private platform, they can do this right, they can. What do you want to order product and Amazon and Amazon so, What do you want to order product and Amazon and Amazon as we now accept facebooks currency Libra. If you use Facebook, you earn some Libra interest, it's actually better to use labour but instead of U S dollars, who's, gonna, stop them and then what friends when they start saying we actually will charge you more. If you use U S dollars, not just a discount. Now it's now it's a convenience feed, because physical cash is harder deal with our

and then what happens when Facebook says we ve already banned you for your speech, you're not allowed to spend our currency. Certainly you won't be aid to use their new crypto currency unless you are following their hate speech, guidelines and their privacy guidelines. Certainly if you published journalism that would challenge the status quo and prove that they are answering your views. They will remove, you from the platform strike one strike to strike three, and now you can't spend money anymore. It's a terrifying future and nothing is being done about it. But do but listen. Many of you may be saying, look I'm not a conservative. Why should I care Many conservatives are obviously facing the brunt of the censorship you ve seen many people policy Watson for US being banned from Instagram and all we did was post selfies of him in the sunset he makes them. On an already, certainly not the worst of the worst. You can not like as opinions. Fine but the reality is they eventually come for everyone

like we ve seen with the far left activists challenging the rise of a radical right as he calls it getting suspended from twitter. We see this, from just two days ago, Facebook sensors quote, find the scars photo series spot lighting a lot. But your body acceptance issue, the censorship will not end with you or me right now in this country. We have a right to free speech under the first amendment, but many of us view the right to free speech as a principal free speech. It's not a law. The first amendment is a restriction on the government that protects several rights, of which journalism is one of them. We can see they take action against journalism. We ve for a long time, because guess Modal publish the story that Facebook was removed, conservative news they were admitted by face when employing that was gives mono publishing that not vartos. Although there thus did come out later with a whistle blower saying Facebook does this, Finally, they had enough and they actually took out the journalism they eat, uncensored. My commentary on the journalism, whilst not gonna, hurt the store the

Nor will continue, and now here we are, but there's a third what what what what Harry on there's more to this. What do you think will happen to any policy? whose starts to challenge the status quo of attack oligopoly, I assure you We do not want to create a world where Visa Mastercard, our teaming up with Facebook, or a new digital currency. If Facebook, if Mastercard us all talking about enforcing bans on the far right and Facebook wants to roll it. A currency things are looking dangerous, the right to exchange value and trade and society should not be beholden to should not be held by a private entity. This is this is a nightmarish, just hope. In future but what about those politicians who would dare stand up for free speech? You may not like Carl, Benjamin You may disagree with everything says, but he did stand up for free speech. Has he made mishaps many people certainly say absolutely and Twitter removed his campaign account

how many people are watching CNN, MSNBC and Fox NEWS quite a bit, but there ratings continue to decline, even Fox news foxes, number one, but their ratings are down. Certainly not bad ass? He announced a really bad Anne and there is there there's an argument. We may that these platforms may have these. These Is China's may have never given someone like Sardine Car Carl Benjamin a chance to speak, but the point is If mainstream news and local journalism is being wiped out and much of local journalism is wiped out by the monopolization. The do up do a lot do opposite, that is Facebook and Google in terms of our ever revenue. Federal and Google control almost all add space period. Because of this, you have to use them to get your message out and if they determine that you ve said bad words, You can't get your message out. Whilst will someone who defends free speech and and challenges a text Ryan be able to whenever again today, maybe and I'll go

I will give props tool as with worn in this regard, when she says we gotta break up attack giants. Perhaps breaking up is the right move but regular an absolutely. We can't allow them to move into the space of controlling the economy through incentives ancient, like listen, many people argued They don't have a monopoly on and on public speech, but who is speaking at City Hall, who is speaking Watching CNN for their speech was watching local news. The ratings are collapsing, a local papers are collapsing, local journalism is collapsing, our local speech is collapsing and its being central. Ice and now they're gonna do the same thing with currency. I assure you and then, if you dare challenge them, they'll, throw you to the wolves. They'll ban, you they lie about you, they'll smear you and their aided and abetted by activists in media, poor thwart Arians. So I asked talking my data dad. Why? Why won't these politicians more than just shut him down. One

Investors said that Canada should just shot Facebook and he said well, of course, the bought and paid for facebooks too powerful. Nobody wants to show Facebook. You have all of your ads removed overnight. No I hear your name again. You won't when it's better to just play ball with the authoritarian tuck oligopoly. Isn't it. What makes you didn't scarier is when you consider what ultimately comes of this shore, Carl Benjamin can speak out in defence of certain things, but what happens when deep, fake technology? create a fake video where someone says that isn't true and Facebook allows it. But if you make a deep fake of sort of say Zuckerberg and he doesn't like it, he can snap his fingers and gone. But what if someone takes your face? My face anyone's face lets? It is a politician who speaks of the people through populist Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders or someone who actually speaks to to populism and says I'm here for the people and then I was a video emerges. You can't really tell what's real or fake where they say something that isn't real,

that bad, but it is kind of damaging and then Facebook says that's acceptable. But the Nancy Policy, video mergers and she sang something. That's laws are speech and Facebook says we're gonna provide the private details of the individual, shared this to a news organization. Whole smear him as a warning, dont speak out against us will shut you down. Spock will share your details if it benefits them and they'll. Take you down, as will the other tat giants, if it's a privacy violation. In this story from Cnet facebooks add targeting, has created a creepy image problem. It can't you, these last few stories. I want to talk about land into the idea, the more joking idea of Mark Zuckerberg as your overlord sure our politicians who stove an opportunity to challenge Facebook but Facebook knows more about you, then you realize in this story talk about despite facebooks too isles plenty of uses are convinced. The show the social network is listening, their conversations, I feel I fear

You may be beyond the point where we can actually do anything about facebooks control over speech there there waiting to a certain capacity, but they do self Instagram Facebook know so much about you. They can predict what you want before you onto it. There's a funny story about a dad who receive letters in the mail from target about pregnancy and mother, for his daughter and got met while my daughter get. Doesn't it turned out, they knew who, because of the big data in the algorithm, Aristotle was actually pregnant. You know that you might think to yourself. I want to challenge this. I wanna defend free speech, but Facebook can already pre empt that face, can ban, you say whatever they want and its because their algorithm can predict what you will end up talking about, and they don't want to risk. It reminds me of Captain America, civil war, when the big airships we're targeting people, they knew could potentially become dissidents and they wanted Only those who had fallen line. We have this story from vocs can elects on Facebook, predict the end of your relationship

exploration dating maybe closer than we think, and many people said they have. We have this story from the washing this makes it even scarier. Social media should be a compliment to real life, not a substitute where they say quote. Addiction is actually the point. That's what social media shareholders are investing in and we know it and I've talked about it behind if you're old engineering, they call it. I'm not joking. There's a company that works with tech firms to manipulate the paper of their users to make them do what they want. We already may be in this era. I mean we're in the era, but we may already be in the world that it can't be changed. Mark Zuckerberg is on top huh You can control what he sees. These tech giants, see you talk about how they don't give their kid cellphones. They want to see this there there isolating themselves, which brings me back to the regional photo. I shared mark Zuckerberg free.

In the real world. Well, while you are all in his virtual environment now, look I love redrawing virtual reality is a fun fun game, but I'm not talking about virtual reality in terms of a headset. We plague we fight robots, fun game by the way. Where will recall the job oculist, but must be critical here, the real virtual world is what the algorithm is feeding you that Mark Zuckerberg and I got I'm being somewhat procedures and a prime using him as a symbol of of tack in general, these companies, one a healthy com, section subject: Dorothy said a healthy conversation. What they deem to be healthy. We are living in a virtual world and if they don't delete this video then know what I'm saying is perfectly acceptable, perhaps because they think they can't lose ever again. They think I've already one? They can delete my channel overnight and lie about me and they have done it. They can say timber What did excellency and what am I going to do? Go while we're living in is our Facebook feeds. Are twitter feed. It are you it's the Youtube algorithm, it's what's being

real virtual world we're living in is our Facebook feeds. Are twitter feed? It are you it's the Youtube algorithm. What's being shown to us that they choose to show to us and they are free from it to an extent. They may think they're in this story from real cup rare, real, clear politics, dont. Let soccer burger, kill free speech, because these TAT Giants Facebook, Google, twitter, etc, joined in with european leaders to sign on to a manifesto of sorts to protect people from bad words because they want to promote healthy conversations. So can can Silicon Valley be deposed of their power? I don't think so. I really don't. I think, we're beyond that point. And they only allow my videos, your comments, because they know it won't really have a big impact. If it did, they take it down, and they have shown us that very tough, had their video removed. I had

by video removed. My video, which was public information, was removed with no chance to appeal. That's them flexing, of course it had given of the story, but it's a warning. They took down a Youtube channel called black pigeon speaks and mentally you are familiar with black pigeon people were outraged. Why was this big whilst channel removed, isn't swear insult he's just kind of a conservative, his general was restored, I don't it could have been an accident, perhaps don't necessarily think it's it's a there's, a big grand conspiracy. I dont think of the people running these these are trolling their moustaches talk about world domination, it's just the dominoes falling falling over and the energy is falling where they lie and that's why we need something to be done about the massive power of these companies. Otherwise we will find ourselves in the end. Just don't be a nightmare which we're Looking into everyday it's getting worse, we ve seen it channels it taken down, and some people have argued. This is a war

its letting you know to fall in line or you will be removed? And that's why the story about the Wall Street Journal in the new currency from Facebook really does terrify me. Facebook tried rolling out some kind of internal currency a long time ago, then really work, but now they have Libra and Mastercard and Visa are behind it. And what then, they can say, you're entitled to free speech and our platform by your harm, to walk immunity, so we're gonna remove modernization like they did to Stephen prouder, Stephen crowded and do anything wrong sitting to break the rules. But you know what you is harmful, so they took away his ad revenue. They want to argue that's right or wrong. Think about what happens when people start using facebooks currency, its one. Thing. If Google wants to sell at your channel, you can't monetize crowd still ass, a way to make money through the channel he has but we're what happens when we'll start using Libra more and more. What happens if this car, The actually succeed, maybe it'll fail the webs of adult succeed with the backing of visa master. And Paypal as pretty damn worrisome. What happens then?

When Facebook says lesson, we don't like your opinions We're not gonna ban. You right even break the rules, but we Organ or revoke access to Libra, all of a sudden, now you're outside of the economy, and you can't use Libra its about whether or not you can actually earn money. It's not the fact that Facebook will ban you from their platform or they'll restrict access to you you'll then go to the store and say you know. I want to pay Leah. Bramble say: oh you ve been rejected. Mastercard is already banned. People patriotic has, as has claimed it was Mastercard, took them down. I fear that were already. Here and on maybe maybe we're not bites if Elizabeth worn is going to say it. Then I think it's not a fringe position to say these texts, I have too much power and we know it the privacy abuses. The sharing of our information, the selling of our information, the scandal after scandal after scandal, the censorship, the restrictions on left wing activists there. Finally waking up to it,

I think we're seeing something truly dangerous unless something is done to change it, but I could be wrong. You know, I think what I often say that the people there really is no grand conspiracy, it just dominoes falling over Mark Zuckerberg and the people at Facebook, Google, Twitter, etc Jack Dorsey Sonata, try they want more, they They always want more humans, always want more. The drive to want more is not a bad thing. It's a good thing. If we were satisfied at any point? We wouldn't be successful because think about it. Think about the nomadic tribe who said no, we need more food, more food. If there are any point stopping at today's enough, whereas when it rains is big storm in the focus washed away or destroyed or they eat, the category so they always wanted more. Human drive for more is a good thing, but we also recognise we need limits. That's why I'm a middle of the road can a person I dont think Social is a good idea. I think capitalism is a good idea, but capitalism needs checks and that's what antitrust law

four inside an extremist position to say that anti trust laws should be used. When you have a duopoly to companies. Controlling majority of the ad market. We should probably do something about that. I don't know the right answer is I don't want to advocate for them to do anything, but I do want to highlight the issue. I want to end this video by making one more important point. In the story about the Nancy Pelosi guy. That was deep. That was, they dachstein it up. I dont know if I dont think I haven't pulled up the search, but I did a search for bowl stories. A lot of people are saying that right, it is taking not true, I dont know if I dont think I had it pulled up the search, but I did it. Four bowl stories. A lot of people are saying that right it taking down the Verity story on Pinterest they're, not their absolute, not so I want to make sure at the end of this video I did that kind of little debunk. You can search for yourself, take them from their task. Put it in search and you'll see. It comes up as regards of all that dates for hang out here. It's mostly job,

about Overlords October Malone, I think he's flaunted subpoenas from other countries. You know I just don't see him ever stepping down relinquishing power and unless something is done, it before Anti Trust is not a new thing and there- and there are other coming face- has been said, walking up an anti trust lawyers. Google is begging to to stop the regulation with the regulation is coming and who knows it formerly form it will take But hopefully everything have explained this video so far that twenty five minutes or so was helpful. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think I ll show you some pretty good examples of double standards in this disturbing path. Whereon Maybe something will be done about it. I don't know what that some is, I just think authoritarianism is bad. So let me what you think the commons below keep the conversation going stay tuned, more videos coming up on. My second channel to become slashed. Him cast news at six p m, and I will see you there. This far left activists guy wrote a book

called Alt America in which the stars have little clan heads on them, so Twitter has spent his account and doesn't it doesn't seem like Twitter actually wants to bring this guy back. It's kind of funny as for the longest time, people like me, other you know, moderate centrists, conservatives and, unlike moderate liberal types, have been raped ITALY saying. Actually I have there there even many progressive and people like Glenn Green Walled, my Tracy etc. Who have said If you push for censorship, you will be censored can't tell you. I can only how many times have you heard me say this? How many? videos have I made about censorship back bearing on left well here we have this man David, even now worked shocked. I tell you that twitter action, this account oh gee from the from daily Coast. Which is considered- I don't no kind of fringy, but I wonder, what's guys

Twitter is showing that it won't even try to distinguish hate speech from the efforts to oppose it. Yes quite literally always been that way. This is not new. Been happening, nonstop and at times. I wouldn't my arms in the air and tell you what's gonna happen. Nobody's Lebanon its people seem to learn and theirs. Still shocked that giant Multi national billion dollar corporations. Don't care about you. You notice orient the low price leg you think Oreo cares. You know all these companies changing their low icons, deprived symbols. They don't care they're, just pandering to what our view is socially acceptable, everyone else, we'd better don't do you think Twitter is going. That none of them, then it. Let me tell you something advertise. Sars, that that that is what Twitter, Google will. Whoever the big companies want the ads. Do you think Pepsi? Why

their tweets, tweet to appear alongside you're, simply book no period and there you go now. I certainly think the right to free expression on these massive platforms which have a massive control over political and public discourse. Is more important than their right to generating added revenue and we have a serious conundrum here. They can't operate without revenue they a private business, but their causing too much damage to the public discourse when they get rid of someone's book like this, I dont know what his book is about. I dont care. What is possible he has a right to make? The book has a right to show the art and he shouldn't we suspend from Twitter because he presents his idea period on foot Fortunately, these people don't seem to understand how business works. They think that when, when you know a target changes there? I come to a pride flag that target actually cares and an hour stress, obviously many spill. Many these people see through the corporate bs other being pandered too.

But when you stand up and say twitter, I demand action, get all your little journalist, friends in your weird twitter ADI left to smear to start. Screaming and ranting and rain, while twitter won't take action, four see this add revenue goes down Twitter goes out an old man. Just ban anybody posts anything about this, because even you're fighting against it. Do you think the advert, as cares care pepper, doesn't care that you're, the good guy doktor pepper just does what their add to appear next year, silly book, so there's a rant rent to the rat, let me just ruins guys say and when will end will go through it because man eyes how many times have you a mere rant about this kind of stuff before we get gotta go to TIM guest outcomes, lashed donate. If you'd like to support my work, there is a pay pal optional, crypto option a physical address, but, of course, like comment share subscribe all that Youtube Engagement, says: hey you to this, because really good so given out rights having reached day for,

counting of my suspension from Twitter for posting the image of plan hooded stars from the cover of my book, Alt America, I can at least report one development. Yes, my life has gotten materially materially better without it I can agree with, that's witnessed arable. I no longer I really postcards anymore. I have runs up before I use do actually linked stories like most I find interesting stories now tree like hey you distortions out. I don't do that anymore. Sometimes rarely I never tweet my own content, I just stopped, and now I kind of like I just block people you know. I've never been a big fan of blocking, but I'm just at this point, twitter is just so goddamn awful, like stone, even care less. Thoroughly don't care anymore. I'm just going to be what I feel. Cleaning, and then I ignore literally anybody which would set me just just. I just don't care what let's Yes, on twitter is a gross housekeeper freedom, Actually my friend Luke from

change sad to have you? We are talking about the other day and he said twitters become basically the new bum fights I think that's actually really good point if not familiar bomb fights was this guy, who would offer like a candy bars starving bombs to make em fight each other film and sell it, and it's a joke. It's meant to be, like you know, hyperbolic facetious, whatever body, but he's got a point. Twitter works because it's like people like watching the mob, just tear itself apart. It's just people attacking each other, but let's, let's freedom he's at its true that I very much miss the stream of news at my feet, provided one I had tried to Taylor to my particular needs as a journalist covering the radical right. I certainly miss the instant communication I have had with my colleagues. None of that is going is easy to replace net now I believe this mandate and I work referred to quit. Let s far right, so I think you data could be wrong, but I think that's where the guy's, minders and quality is such tepid, like centrists, intellectual, dark, Webby, note not far right

at all by the way, but the low level stress: let's do it the low level stress of being on twitter, dealing with adversary, conversations contending with the ugliness that Europe's whenever trolls come rolling around is one of those things like regular dry. Even during rush hour that you might that that you most when you stop doing it yeah. I get not look I've I've just before, but my notifications are perma locked at ninety. Nine plus, like the little bell icons, is none then plus I never could never click it. You too, they may not gonna see period and twitter. Like semi notifications, random lakes, Ionian understand why someone will treat me like twitter notifies me, but I don't care like dude. It's not that I don't wanna, see the messages from people who are like Tron. Actually contact me. It's just like wise. Twitter are choosing what which, which out of the five thousand tweets in the past hour, got they're gonna show me and my son, my phone, so

I want to turn off notification because I get dams and museums or private, so that actually is useful for me as a tool of communication, but swipe they'll be like you know I look at my phone I'll have like fifty plus notifications swipe gone dont care not going to read it, and I gotta tell you mean: there's there is there. Happy Medium between us outright right, deleting twitter, which I was really close to doing. I believe most of my tweets, I'm sick of the platform, but this happy medium. When that and just like not engaging anymore, so I thought about I'd like a lot followers be once you have to say so. I'm just gonna never interact for the most part and We would have liked waiting one if you liked waiting it and then I'm ignore everybody in their solely nonsense. In all, some people agree with me on a bad, but you know what I'm done. David says that said, For many obvious reasons, I am working to end the suspension, but I am adamant about not removing an image that isn't hateful but is pure political commentary, but it's a private

platform, they could do whatever they want and I'm fighting for it, because the reductio ad absurdum of twitters reasoning for suspension would leave not just me but any reporter who works to monitor and exposed activities. Afar extremists exposed to the constant threat of being banned simply for doing our mainstream jobs as journalists. Oh you finally figured How many times have journalists been suspended? Quite a few? Actually, how many activists have been suspended for trying to prove that you know some vandalism more violence or something was coming from the far right. Quite quite quite a lot. I've made several videos about this when Will you silly humans? Learn that your disease? I am to censor certain images, will send you partially Simpsons Yogurt there. As I did hear back from twitter. This is and I was given by a company spokesperson. We don't allow hey, call symbols in avatars or header images in order to protect users from

unintentionally be exposed to abusive imagery. That can be upsetting We know that some people may use these symbols to confront a hateful ideology, but it's not always obvious at first glance. In this case, a national context in the account profile clarifies the intent of that isn't always visible in the product. So far, ample someone viewing the header on mobile wouldn't have the MR context and would only see the hateful image they don't care quite literally, are telling you context is irrelevant. Please please David and everyone who wants to fight which, like the farm, understand this. They will come for. You first just I'm just shot at brick. Walls, though it's like it's like you know, you're just shouting at a wall in the walls like but you're, a big it, that's all somewhat scraping than on a brick wall, you're, a big it and a matter humming. To try and save them, they're gonna central you that's the only thing you see. Look at his book, visible could be pro far right

How is anyone supposed to know its critical or trying to expose them? Quick, quite literally, could be pro propaganda for them. So so do think context matters No, and I actually outside of context this. Should be banned, twitter is a platform. Are people engage political conversations, twitter, don't care. Twitter wants, add dollars, guys I don't wanna be next year silly, but the problem this rationale are twofold. First, it accepts at face value the image in my profile is hateful. It is and treats. The text as meaningless. Almost all areas. I seem to recall money- people an account dangler as a big insane context in matter here we are, we ve come full circle. Congratulations on. Finally, realising that the push for authorities- terrorism that you and that is actually controversy involving trump and the first member right now, but I get to that later, maybe from other video, that's wit,

and you say I want big, daddy to censor my opponents. He goes, you know what you're both annoying me Swat sort of both of you. You don't twitter once Twitter wants people to talk about friends Twitter, once people to talk about the latest, the Indices Valley of Game of Thrones Twitter wants you to talk about. Chernobyl. Twitter doesn't want you to post your book, which was a bunch of plan hoods because That is bad for the bottom line. Congratulations, your activism will be silenced and I- sure you, the actual far right, we'll take off the hoods put them in their storage locker and put on some other type of hat and they'll chain. The meaning of whatever they need to say the change that the word and they'll change there Symbols and they'll, hide it all with dung whistles. Now, of course, We stand a left, these dog whistles everywhere, but I gotta say: there's a bit of viruses in reading an article like this, where it's like you Oh me, you everybody has been watching my videos, we ve been sitting here, saying Oh no, look what they're doing these people

I've lost their minds and ours that kind of like smoking a cigar like Europe. Because you can assume that common, so I don't know whatever he shouted. Concludes this one off the ramble for another twenty men for the same thing to talk about every every other week he said I will admit this a lot about twitter. I miss I especially miss its didactic qualities resulting from a to enter and eighty character limit, because it's been, ass. An embassy see how readily people can absorb information once delivered, invites ice chunks actually really bad thing. In my opinion, screaming and not me, able to connect with my fellow journalists is frankly something of a professional debacle, so well content to discuss this with with folks at twitter and report back to you on how it's going. Hopefully at some point my account will be restored. In the meantime that imagine how nice and productive life is when you're off Twitter will hear hear David. I completely agree with you on that. One then now spending less time on twitter. Admittedly, you know all

every damn. Reading news or twitter is there, but you know look this is just another individual who doesn't stand there and there, like first in the chopping block. Ok, when you want to expose someone, you need to have proof. Your proof is hateful you will be banned and the people who are trying to ban will put a nice suit and I don't know what you're talking about and then you'll never be able to prove a limitless. Even if one were to forego I've, also restore before I was in the UK and was Argo, someone about a particular individual who is considered to be a racist and I said that they on Youtube had used some slurs these individuals, I thought you your line, and I said what no not like this person on you to make these words like we talked about and they said, bs I've never seen that prove it. I said. Ok, I pulled my phone searched on Google so and so says acts can find anything. It was really weird because you know the week prior

to expire in the? U s I had seen the story activists were sharing in saying we ve got this guy, so I'm here in the UK, I'm not saying that the exact reason why couldn't find it- I don't know I couldn't find it. But I'll tell you this. On the Google search page, there was nothing at the bottom. It said we have removed. Certain things are being offensive, yadda, yadda yadda, and I and I thought to myself again. I can't prove that the art one question was removed. I couldn't find it, but when I saw that message I said well, there you go. They are their cleansing, the worst of the worst, their hiding list. When someone the far left says something extremely you know, a violent or cause for milk shaking. That's not I mean Maybe the but for some reason no Bennett. We see that we say you're nuts. Then, when you get someone on the fringe, far right of everyone to call it saying some summit

dream is nonsense. Twitter bans it. We do want that on our platform and they clean it up. So I have described it before. The right is being made to look prim and proper, and the left is being made to look like cycle paths. Censorship is backfiring, on the left and they are shocked what happened to them, because you know what they're so entrenched in their insane tribalism that when someone like so you're, it's really annoying. I've been on the left. My whole life- I am still like moderate centre left, like I'm actively like Andrew Yang Dogma, that, due to its great, is not perfect, but he's a really good did and I'm written form and I'm looking for the debates. They don't care, they don't care that you know someone who is a lifelong. You know I was at. I was bud, left fart fart and I guess when I was younger going to be. Everything wearing you know. You know black tee shirts black genes skating hang out other punks and they don't they don't care what my perspective as they don't care that I right. All they know is the tribe sad acts and you do it. The tribe says, but now that their being slammed in the

every single day by their starting to wake up, and standing in the whole time like guys and they ve been yelling at me. Telling me off insulting me. So you know what I will still defenders, I will still stand by this man in your book, should absolutely be allowed on. Twitter. Twitter should reinstate your profile immediately. No questions asked, we know what your intent was. We note the context, as you are allowed to your opinion and your opinion as import for public discourse- I want everyone to see your book. I want them to see your perspective. In fact, I would recommend people by the book and read. It is important to know what people you disagree with. Think knowledge is power if you can better understand the perspective of David I work. Perhaps we can actually come to a better understanding to solve problems in this country, but, what's happening is

well being pushed aside there being divided censorship, doesn't work and people are not being exposed to new ideas. You dont have to agree with them by no means, but I do recommend you try and you know, research and understand those. You do disagree with. Perhaps many of you do agree with him and you do like his book. Well, you, then you should stand and in agreement with me that we should make sure twitter doesn't have the arbitrary power to silence, dissidents and research. Chosen journalists and activists and that all of this is important for public discourse. Complex problem because, as we have seen from the University of Missouri Study Twitter amplifies extremes somewhat, we know when David tweets this it's more are likely to get shared and an incentive to peoples to people's faces than someone talking, Moderate policy and, like you know, social cohesion not the solution, as I do feel like its content like this. That is divisive and makes things dangerous, but at the same time people are, you know you can't regulate human interest. Humans want this, so they do. I don't want to tell you men twitter to another,

to engineer society in the direction it thinks is healthy. That's a nightmare! It's just opium, where a few men Corporations are telling us what were allowed to say in think. Isn't that a nightmare? I can't believe I grew up watching these movies like viva vendetta, you know, hearing stores of nineteen, eighty four animal farm etc. All of these disturbing in future future novel, about how mega corporations or totalitarian and governments are going to restrict thought, and we must fight against it that, arouse whether resistance fighting the author. Preparing machine the mega corporations, the government whatever- and here we have today the left, cheering on my private business. I feel like I'm living in some kind of fantasy nonsense world, but hey I'll, say this final thought, final final, if this is a wake up call for someone like David and he's willingness and behind free expression. I welcome with open arms a handshake and a welcome to the flight

Let's make sure your speeches protected as well as everyone else, as you may like their speech, but two things are important, one that the worst of the worst or exposed when they say what they think and we can see what they're saying and too that you are able to expose them with your thoughts and opinions, do not care if your left right top down whatever religion. The point is Let people speak their minds, so we know it. They truly thinkin. We know their intentions and if they try and hide it, let people like David pilot information. They think will expose them Otherwise we are living in a strange and pc gray. Jumpsuit shaved had world we'll make a corporation is sending us for re education to tell us what we shouldn't shouldn't. Think what a nightmare goddamn rant over stick around more more segments, the common excellent at one p m, and this gentleman

see them bill more often says some really dumb things. He said something of their daily. He made fun of vodka and I'm just like wait. Wait wait! Do that making fun of somebody's appearance sooner whenever but Bill MAR rips political correctness, as J W over Oberlin College scandal. I saw the store and thought to myself, you know, I'm not gonna, be the bill. Mar commentary chance had ton of videos showing that You see said about social justice and little correctness we made some he made a really really important point pushing back calling on liberals to push back against the outrage mob. And lo and behold, Mr Gent, you of the young, Turks is outraged. No one helps right wing more than bill more and making so called political correctness appear to be a significant issue, even it think. It's real it s a minuscule problem here too, the horrors of the right wing, but if it affects more personally when it gets paid to speak on college campuses.

So to him at a huge issue every weekend on tv and makes a tiny issue seem like the end of the world and create false equivalency between progressives and right wing based on his personal peak and pocket book I find it really funny that you have people like John Jago and HU, I will criticise in this capacity but also like David Pachmann, who I do a lot of respect for we ve already conversations but they're both of the opinion that the outrage mob is a fringe thing. There have been People like Kevin Heart was most to host the Oscars, and then he got basically remove long story short because of jokes from ten years ago. All, but it's not a big deal listenin just because this doesn't affect you doesn't mean it's not deal, and he makes that interesting point that is affecting Belmont oh MAR thinks then issue. So what why it's hilarious, that was there was when I went to set political- and I was talking to January-

framing a monolithic S, another story- it happened while ago, but he was yelling at me, say nonsense. I'm are we talking about. We call me a trump support. I'm sorry dude now and I I sense thing like everybody brought up, be criticised me for talking about Anti fought and I said so you're mad that I criticise them for physically attacking people and he's like what about the right job all these. You know far right now like their bad to what you re talking about it's this weird tribe. World. He lives in where he thinks Owen his issues- are important and what's funny about it, as is pointing a bill Margaret a little more only thinks his issues are important. Only by issues are important. Like ok Genk, you don't seem to understand, and everybody lives in in a world with with a view- and you have people should understand this, because this is actually part of a left wing argument on journalism that everybody has a bias and their focused on specific things hopefully get and understand that so for me

I'm wondering why the Democrats are doing bad and I haven't to agree with Bill MAR that regular liberals don't like this stuff. They don't what's wrong with Bill MAR to very wise, I think she's great, not perfect. You said some silly things I called out for that's fine. I tried to be overly despite what Why I mean this is backed jangle just disagree about perfect by the way, I probably said, some silly things, the path. I know. If what they bring up some interesting points about Oberlin and about how liberals need to fight back. So, let's, let's, let's ride through this before we get started, had over two TIM Cast, our consultation on it. If you'd like to support my work, there is a pay pal, optional, crypto option a physical address, but, of course, like comment share subscribe. All of those things help because tells you to you. You, like the content and the what you too busy to determine whether or not I am worthy of being shown to anybody from the college Spill more rips political correctness. Estorade only was over Oberlin College scandal, comedian

Hbo House bill Mark took, took it to S J W during the Friday upset real time by noting that the recent work against Oberlin College. Perhaps these devoted to political correctness, are finally finding that there is a price to pay for their antics. I am glad to hear at Oberlin story is, is is an affront to justice, but it came in the end. They want and justice was served. They won for three four million dollars and I'm not gonna rehashing all sorts of nine couple vetoes on it. Oberlin college ordered Forty four million people you're gonna, be reduced authority free because of some state limits, but it was a small bakery up against a massive institution and the outrage mob and the small bakery one good They say. Are they going to explain why just explained, though, a political, progressive, more is no fan of pc, noting that it does more harm than good to the cause of liberalism.

I completely agree. I feel I feel like no more and I would have a really excellent conversation and agreeing to a bunch of different things, and he could explain some things to me. I could Besides him for some of his like I get, is a comedian, wants to rag on people and be made as something that disagree with him about, but I think he's off reflective and I think he seeing the light. You know that a good liberal defends free speech, Donald I'm kind of someone's just waited about not being of the barn the american flag, not an antenna hell. No, I don't. I don't know if I could full video on it. Maybe in oxide I've got to go hold up on what of it. I probably will. I think I think I'll do it in, like you know to more segments. Could I really really want to talk about them saying no light burning, but I don't get into that lets. Let's read this so they so this ok College fixed on college fix is voting Fox news courting real time, but I'll read it anyway. It's silly during real time panel segment near times, columnist very wise. You don't, then I can disagree with more in a lot of the silly things he says, and I know a lot of people to screen way more

commentator. Charlie Sykes added that the bullying culture and the calling you out mentality have intensified in recent years. They have spot on. I am you, don't know, I can disagree with more in a lot of the silly things he says, and I know a lot of people to screen way more, but this is a good show. It really is ok because Bill Mars, the kind of liberal you want be at odds with he's the kind of person who wants a bill that ideas ridiculous. I will invite you on and you'll talk and we'll make fun of you and you'll make fun of him excellent, not this ridiculous. Everyone, shrink, as happened our lungs throwing bottles and molotov and twenty people fired. I'm tired of the term political correctness. Psych said later: it's like performative weakness in our motto, culture. We have to find a way to humiliate to drive people out there. We disagree with, and I will

Oh you that there is a huge backlash, the folks on the right, we're baling on liberalism, their basically saying that quote the left wants to destroy you. They hate you. They want to take away your rights, they want to destroy your business. Unfortunately, you have anecdotes like this that make it plausible more asked, How do we get mainstream liberals to stand up to that faction? I'm right here, buddy, I'm right here and I'll. Tell you what they're there are. There are good. Serve additives, there are modern, there are centrist our libertarians and we are all standing here right side by side, the liberals, the real liberals who want to push back on this insanity. I kid you remind me of that that mean of our Lord of the rings where grimly and illegal s or next each other and he's like, I never thought I'd be sent. Side by side with enough war about a friend and unlike yes, it was so surprising to me when feminist Megan Murphy,

I'm pretty sure games. I had a conversation with Ben Shapiro body platform in Miss gendering and, unlike you, have a staunch orthodox, jewish conservative right without with with a radical feminist they're, having a conversation side by side against these weird fringe outrage. Culture is sell it and pc we're going to call it So I can say this about junk. I definitely think he's a way better than a lot of these people. You know he went out on me. I was shocked known for a long time been a show couple times We saw each other vagina, fine conversation, political disagreements. The central you know, centre left type that He is a necessary, like I'm, not a big fan of corporate Democrats either. So I agree with him on that, but I am not a fan of. How's, your Cortez just saying non stomach defend over tribalism, but I do think egg is better. But but again is a lot to criticise the man for special because he even after me, but I try to do my best

when I think someone is is genuine and Jake sat down to her Carlsson and they agreed a lot, and I have tremendous respect for that. You're. U Andrew Yanks, astound Ben Shapiro Dave Reuben Tremendous respect. You want to sit down with somewhat across the hall. That's what we need. Bill Mars: asking the right questions. What can we do to get them to stand up because they have been an active it's time to tell these people too, away, so we can resume the real normal. Sir. In arguments about how we are one country about how we mostly agree on everything and the little things we disagree on. We can fight. Early over on tv on the rating. In person and get rid of bike locks and the bottles and the club in the Maldives and all other nonsense. You only people, don't you walking around with you. No body the armor and weapons none of that stuff. If we can get mainstream liberals to push back on these fringe weirdos and tell them off, I think we have some hope. I do, however, our I will tell you what I say

Gonna happen, I think like Genk Uber coming out and slamming bill more, we are to see all of he's digital media outlets get sick and tired of more and there and accuse of the the worst neuron com. The worst things the book and trying to show shut down Mars, opposition to pc man is almost led him to being ousted as a graduation speaker at Berkeley and twenty fourteen. Two years later, more took it to Emory students who had a paroxysm. Self righteous indignation at a pro trump talking. I so badly want to drop it. Ok, where we hold on our! So this! Yes, I do. I don't necessarily read this quote because I'm I'm I'm concerned about what you too will do. But go marvellously says ice. I I so badly want to India. He then goes on to say, inflict time on these kids into a place where there is actual pan suffering. What happened in this country, so forgive me first stopping on that quote, but you now you tube. As my neck

video on my main channels, me a big segment about our Lord and save your mark. Zuckerberg and Silicon Valley is oppressing speech. I want to be very, very careful that one is better ideas. We found something that really struck a nerve, the very tough story, so we do have to be really really careful and that's why I think they'll Mars right and Jane. Is wrong and that will be the next segment. Listen. I made a video commenting on censorship. And the Silicon overlords said no, and they shut me down They should bear cast down, they filed a complaint against crowd or you can see them flaunt their power beyond just the censorship against conservatives they ve gone after journals So yes, this is a serious problem. It's not just the extra double use, its the it's. The entire tech oligopoly, which is just littered with these people and their oppressive, regressive ideology that seeks to inflict pain and suffering on people for no reason you and have a real discussion with someone like go my real liberal, his audience who collapse and cheers when he said

things like this: it can be done. You can have a conversation, but these fringe Widows, will try and destroy you and they have allies in the media. I'll leave it there. Next conversation, we're gonna move into, is our Lord and say mark, Zuckerberg, which, dear God, I hope you Know- is me being sarcastic, stick around that's a little becoming up shortly. Admittedly, for those of you in the back ass, you may have heard it already so I'll season from- Limburg, Buzzfeed staff plan to walk out in push to get union recognised my understanding, There has been a hundred and twenty three days since Buzzfeed staff cited to union eyes and came like a month after fifteen percent of their staff were laid off, which is really weird when yes hundred twenty three days, I think that's what looks pop over the Buzzfeed news. Buzzfeed news union twitter account and as of the fourteenth, but it was a hundred and twenty three days.

Company, just laid off a huge portion of its staff and now you're, asking for more money. They'll probably have to lay people off this. What what bothers makes out? You know I I you know I just did, Let's talk about what happens when you're company is failing and laying off its death, you decided unionized, you get laid off, lay offs come after being innovation, because the company doesn't have infinite money. The company just laid off if portion of its staff and now you're, asking for more money? They'll probably have to lay people off this? What what bothers makes out? You know You know I just did a video others when vocs went through this. But let me just tell you If you are somebody who works one of these offices, let me make it very clear for you what exactly will happen if you push to get a contract several things first, while contract we really good and from that point on things, can be better. What will happen to you? What will likely be bad? Some people will get raises. Some people will get better,

but the money has to come from somewhere, so it breaks down. Let's say your office has a hundred thousand dollars to spend per year on a specific thing and paying three people- thirty thousand dollars a year, really bad for New York rivals one hypothetical numbers: what ten thousand dollars extra bought, that thirty k there still paying taxes insurance let's just say four hundred forth for three people: thirty k: it cost him a hundred grand in in that year. You then go to them and say: hey everybody. Let's all get together and demand more money. We want forty k, one other go. Where do we find a twenty thousand dollars? I got it fire, one of them. Take the money, we have paid them and split it up between the other two, while it certainly great that one two people will get a raise, their workload will increase and you got fired Maybe you'll be the lucky ones: get fired fire. The point is: if its Buzzfeed is already Lange

pull off. I just don't understand what is going to their minds. Here's where you will read this article that I've got this blog from the Busby Union talking about what they why they wanted and what's really interesting about what you're talking about as they kind of over the fact that bus weeded losing money and laying we block. So, let's report get started at our thinking the council s done it. If you'd like to support my work, there's a pay pal optional, crypto option! A physical address but, of course, like comet, share subscribe. It really helps a channel of engagement from Bloomberg. Buzzfeed staff plan to walk out by Sweden. Ism boys are playing a walk out for Monday Corner people from over the matter. Just days after a similar protest by staff at Vocs media led to that companies. First, labour agreement, Buzzfeed: U S is the greater union eyes in February to me saying they would seek better benefits and fair pay, proceeding sub caught, some colleagues lose their jobs the prior month, what its since then they been calling on Swedes management to recognise their union. So it was all done company is losing money so that away

people off so now employees are trying to unionized to ask for more money. It's like a self fulfilling prophecy of destruction. You know then we're gonna lay people off if you ve got a guy gods, unfair and then they're gonna collapse even further like what because we want to send our money works. The news guild, which represents Buzzfeed Union, didn't respond to requests for comment, a Buzzfeed representative, Company has made an offer to voluntarily recognise the union, but the terms haven't been accepted. It has been. The table since last week we hoped accepted unions in companies. Frequently far over which workers should be included as part of a new bargaining unit on Thursday Davy Alba, a buzzing reporter tweeted to Buzzfeed chief executive officer on a pretty and Buzzfeed NEWS, editor in Chief and Smith, we are so close. There are only two issues left resolve in our voluntary recognition agreement: job cuts, in January Buzzfeed eliminated fifteen percent of its headcount part of a wave of I wasn't. Media outlets this year, publisher,

like Buzzfeed, once the darling somewhere. The media industry have struggled to media employs, walked a profitable, a business models, but tumult has led journey several media outlets to opt for collective bargaining, while that hasn't prevented, lay offs has, in some cases cushion the blow. For instance, agreements. And help ensure that workers will lose their jobs, get severance pay the money past your car, but from somewhere earlier this month, hundreds of vocs media employs walked off the job. A day later they re too tentative labour agreement. The union contract includes minimum salary guarantees and four months of paid parental leave, among other things. So I will just stressed this before moving on to Buzzfeed statement. If people are getting laid off- and you say hey- we need severance package as if we get laid off they need to get. Money from somewhere to pay for that severance package. What don't you understand? So what they'll do as if I'm gonna have to pay? You said,

a thousand dollars a year. How about? We fire you now with you know a month and a half a severance, so you're gonna get it now, five grand or so or you know, six grand or whatever, and then that extra sixty or so what I refer to the you know, modesty taxes, we save, we can use to pay for the severance backers of everybody else, get it. It means they will Yes, lay somebody off, maybe that somebody be you. But anyway, you will see and understand that money is finite and for business and making money you know. So what sort of this is the Buzzfeed NEWS union dot com slash blog, I'm assuming the bus Virginia to make. Maybe it's not but makes sense that it is they say seven things. You definitely want to know about the Buzzfeed nosing you're. Not so funny made Alyssa Cole, they say what the union. We are you, you are us. We joined together to fight for a contract that ensures better more equitable workplace conditions after months of it fine I'll grievances and goals more than ninety.

Of newsroom staffers from all yours bureau sign the union cards. I would definitely be the ten percent I'd be like never gonna happen, and I would actually here's my thing. I dont want to be a part of union. I've never wanted to be a part of a union. I have no problem with unions, I think they're, very I just and promptly, and I'm sorry, I think a lot of bargaining is great and I think people coming together to to make demands awesome, I'm not interested, that's fine I'll! Just leave. You know. That's me just me, I'm not saying you should I will say that there are certain stupid rules in like federal law, about what you can't or can do, which I was found nonsense goal of homage to leave a leaf, but personally the union's I've been forced to join because you're some jobs I worked at they eat you have to. If you don't want a union, you literally can't get the job that the Ngos BS I was forced to, and then I wasn't able to get promotions or raises because of you in contracts gee. That's one I worked my ass off and I saw the people not working. There

and then I said man, that's not fair, I'm working harder than them. Don't I have an opportunity to move up. Management said: no, because you can contracts forbid it, what they said that and it's not working has seniority over use of big it benefits. Unlike what they're not do they're making more Carter, I didn't like it. So I said why can't I just leave and not be a part of this union. Is ideas being contract, everyone's gonna be a part of it. I quit. I don't want to be involved in that stuff. You can if it works. For you, that's fine, but I don't like the idea. Forced to do it. So I know what is it? We are you? U, r us! I get it! No, I M, not you and many people are not you. What do we want? We want an inclusive contract that covers all non managerial editorial staff media industry standard call an editorial unit within the We will also argue that certain titles should be included If our union is only made up of specific titles instead of recognised as a whole management can it people from the union by changing titles or adding new ones, overtime, yeah

no matter what they can do. They can always make you a manager, and then you are no longer in the union. We want people to be able to change jobs, collaborate and experiment without jeopardizing their union protection, but that's fine. I can agree with that. Certain things are being held up because you know buzz, you don't wanna recognize certain shows so, What's what sort of its own o his from that we got stood up there? at about that, rather than do walk out, but read this what's happening. I was from April after abruptly counts Our last session management has agreed to meet with a mandate to pm we're ready to make progress. Who has the power to recognize us early, Ben Psmith. The editor in chief of Buzzfeed NEWS. Why is important where they are The sooner we recognised the sooner. We can get working on a contract that improves our working conditions, which I believe you deserve good working conditions one. Guarantees due process during terminations, one hundred and agree that should be that that should be granted, and I believe it's a great thing to be arguing for

a diverse newsroom, I don't know what that means, or what you're asking for some pressure Buzzfeed does that ETA? Maybe there's on there specific, reasonable severance during lay offs, and I can agree with this as well- and I mean to address unfair pay differences. There is a means to do that. It's called going. Your boss and sang I want more money and when they say we're not gonna. Give you more money, you say I quit that's it! That's how business like I don't understand, I think one of the problems with like we're the big differences between the left and the right. Is that many people on the left are reliant on collective power, whereas given the right rely on personal responsibility. So I'm kind of a weird like hybrid position, and politics are probably reflected in this in that I believe in a lot of collective policy for sure, but I'm very very much

so for myself want to be left alone? So let me tell you what I do. Let me, let me give you all a lesson: how to get a race. You wanna get arrays at work. Here's to do. Let's say you workin magnets and they're, paying you ten bucks an hour, and you want more money startup onto barking and Wendy's. You know I mean I am using his business as an example of comparable industries applied a working say I must get twelve dollars an hour and if they say no have a nice day, you still get your job. Mcdonalds go to Wendy's. I want twelve thousand our they say. Yes, there you go now go to your boss and and say. I want to raise a twelve dollars an hour and say we can't do it say and offered work at one he's, a twelve thousand, our and I'll take it, and if they say I'm sorry, we can give you the race. Woollen go work, what is at the higher salary- and although I tell you what very likely will say: ok will match it. Then I and call your bluff be prepared for it. Thriller really simple. Here's what I said

But let's say you have a career the job. Let's stay Mcdonald's calls you right now and I mean no disrespect we're not mix Madonna. I actually think perching is worse. Amygdala, let's doubts called you your phone rang. Any answers, Mcdonald's with tells us. A guy says John, I want you to work here, starting tomorrow. What you say yes or no, most well give a second answer. Most people say no core element resolve them. Do that? Let me first off by saying: if you need a jog, need a job take a job but, more importantly, the correct response is not yes or no. It's How much you that mitten! You say I want to know about right, so we got a call me now, and so we want you to work, the register. I'd say: ok, Gimme, a million dollars and I'll work for a month nine dollars for one month then Mcdonalds. That's insane! Why would we pay that? Because I don't want to work there? Are I don't need to work there and if that's it, you gotta pay me to live and work there. So I had a friend who want to get a job and media company.

What kind of did you wanted a job and they offer something like sixty and he sat a market, It gets too low. Ominously not once have all oh, don't I know what you want is I don't think I want it. So when you take the job for ninety, not really which take a job, four hundred twenty, ok hundred twenty, I would do as a great email in that and is but the going to say no and I'm like great, then you don't take a job. What in first place is a good point, so that is this the way I view you know, media if I'm getting paid unfair you did? I did I was advice and eight said here's. What I want is that will give it to you and will pay you action as a great and then I think it what I wanted, so I met with the Boston. I'm, not getting one. I wanted you agreed to this, for that and they said, will take care of it, and I said: ok, they didn't take care of it So I went back and said it wasn't. I care of this is now the second I'm coming. I want changes today or I'm done and they said changes will be an effect immediately. Boom pay rights just like that Bob done it was that simple

and then, after a third time where I said they raise came in, I am still not getting everything. I asked for warm coming out, I'm quitting, they said bizarre, have a nice day. I've Ellis. Does it end of story? That's what I do. But it s a lot of people dont want to do that so when they have problems instead of talking to boss anchors my problem they go. Just complained to their friends. Look How can a rag on if you want anything you deserve it, but I'll end by saying this: Busby doesn't have the money there, Lang, people off there a lot more people off, I guarantee it take that. Take that to our I'll. Take that guarantee right out make that. But, of course I think I could be wrong, but I will I be wanted. That's anyway, the more assignments, a calm, and I will see you in a few minutes. Did you oh! That Donald Trump has frequently called for it to be illegal, to burn the american flag, the first story from the daily wire, Trump endorses amendment that would let Congress Congress private flag burning? However,

I believe it was ruled officially and like eighty nine flag burning is protected speech This would be an amendment that would allow them to specifically prohibit the burning of the flag, the idea, being it's my understanding that while they will still consider a form of expression. They will specifically prohibit flag, burning and nothing else. Well, let's rate and figure out what this actually is and then we also have some, in my opinion, questionable comments from Kansas Owens, which will go through on Friday. Ret Steve Womack ends Steve Danes introduced a constitutional amendment to give Congress the authority to prohibit burning the american flag, which I really doubt will ever passed but let's ride on resolving to set in the House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress, assembled two thirds in each house concurring therein. Following article has proposed an amendment to the constitution of the United States, which will be felt to all intents and purposes as part of the constitution when ratified,

I'd, buy the legislatures have three fourths of several states within seven years after the date of its submission and for ratification schoolmate, the Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the. U S, both Womack and Danes issued press releases. Regarding the proposed amendment, Womack stated: our flag is more than a cloth painted red, white and blue. It is assumed of worldwide freedom, unity and liberty. I agree with that, but, I also recognise that some people don't take kindly to what the flag represents, because we do have enemies in this country. It has guided troops into battle. Yes,

flown during our triumphs and challenges absolutely and is placed placed over the caskets of those who have paid the ultimate sacrifice. Generations have fought to defend our stars and stripes, and the american people have simply given too much for the flag. Do not have the ability to protect it. I have tremendous respect for this country and its flag also have criticisms for this country and what the flag represents, but for the most part I believe in respecting the flag, the flag and touched the ground. It should befall it properly and it represents something incredible. I throw the thousands tens of thousands of years of human history we have made it pretty. Damn awesome

and we have we have. We have brought about civil liberties, for so many groups that couldn't have in the past. I understand is coming from my family what it means, because I get you know, listen maybe for people who aren't of dual ethnicities or or multi multiple various heritages. I M a person of diverse genetic and ethnic heritage and a lot of countries in the world. That's really bad. It is, and people too like that, it's impure America is very, very different and that I can do whatever I want. I'm they fall citizen with full rights, America's an awesome things and that's like means a lot to me. I've been to countries where they would do bad things to me if they found out when my parents were right, so there are still many countries in this world or very backwards because I'm damn good job, we're gonna, say the Danes made a similar comment, adding that our nation should always render the flag the honor and dignity it is do several, but

veterans organizations have endorsed the proposal, including the American Legion of Montana, and the Department of Montana veterans of foreign wars on Saturday, tromp himself, a full throated endorsement in a tweet saying that he want. The moment for a strong ban on burning the flag on no brainer. They I want to say, however, although the treaties, Ultimately, seventy thousand quote likes as publication. Numerous twitter users score sheet of the present for support of the proposed amendment, Jeffrey Goodman, psychologist and self described, aren't critic of Trump linked a clip, a clip from a twelve interview. Which the late Supreme Court Justice, Antonym Scully, stated that flag burning was indeed a form of free speech protected by the first amendment and I would tremendous respect for Friskily a statement when he said if I working, I would jail all bearded hippy weirdos whatever, but I am not, and they have a first meant that protects them, and that is that is a tremendous So he said something like are usually said. If I working, I would not allow people to go

about burning american flag. However, we have a first amendment which has the right of free speech. I shall not be abridged and it is addressed in particular to speech critical. The government that was the main kind of speech that tyrants would seek to suppress bearing the flag as a form of expression speech doesn't just mean. Words or oral words, it could be some afore burning, lag, is a symbol that expresses an idea. I hate the government. The government is unjust. Whenever I will say this, I've absolutely no problem with restricting burning in certain certain circumstances, because you don't want someone to light a fire and start a bigger fire united me. So it's not it's not absolute. In my opinion, tromp is wrong as his canvas Owens and she tweeted about you. No one can take away citizenship, which tromp I tweeted something to the effect as well I'll say this. I think those rights Annabelle restrictions on burning a flag for fire safety reasons and if done properly the right way you build a burn, the flag there, that their seriously are issues of people playing with fire that we want. We want taken into consideration

because that is very different from you. Yelling things, so that's true for, like any other kind of expression, if you wanna get a big sign with poles on it and if they look man, you can't have the pool, because the pork turn to weapon that I can understand the daily. Why goes on to talk the ruling in which the majority opinion for taxes be Johnson Justice, Brennan wrote that enough light burning essentially protected, just Gunny Justice Kennedy and I concur in opinion. They say that the jet daily, why reached out to Womack, contains for common. What did anything? But I will do this, let's jump over to Canvass Owens who treated. If I were president the punishment for U S flag, would be the renunciation of citizenship, no jail time, no fine, simply one year to liquidate your assets and get the hell out of our country, in exchange, we extend citizenship to a hard working, legal immigrant and surprise, surprise, is basically a free one disagrees. There are a lot of you I agree with her. I tweeted and starch this agreement, and I lost like fifty followers out of three

the red and thirty, six thousand, that's pretty good odds is pretty good numbers right. Most people agree. I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. In fact, I will say I am personally disgusted by those who are desperate the flag. I take great pride and and at an end, it is an honour to be in a country of such success and progress, so when it comes to historical ideas- and you know, items and and and story and history things that represent where we came from. I really really value these things. Ancient history is very important the burning of a library of Alexander Alexandria, is a curse upon this world, the knowledge that we lost so when I see someone desperate the flag, it's it's its offensive. Unlike listen man, you know represents the success in the progress we have made. As a country, however, burning

flag also represents another bit of that success again. With recognition for the potential for fire hazards, when I see protesters Barnett flag, I laugh right eye. It makes me not like the person, like you know, a man. You know I get I'm not gonna, I'm not gonna hate someone for doing it, but it does give milk us our taste, but I do see that it represents the fact that we do not live in it in a tyrannical tyrannical dick your ship, it means that we have succeeded, and we have found true liberty that you can point. You can point to but whatever politician whenever symbol and tell him to go f themselves, and that means a lot because there are countries that would shut your head off for doing something like this. But America not one of them in Amerika. We can say screw you to anybody and you can't do anything about and that should be protected as much as I don't like. The idea of desecrate symbols that represent progress, and you know unity and things like that. That's how the flag. I fully recognise. There are people who are you

this has caused problems for Obama, flew drones. Over foreign countries and and and bombed children. So certainly we'll see flag as a sign of oppression. I can respect and understand that, but I don't I disagree, judging by our worst and we and we to strive to oust the authoritarian dictators that that the militaristic, whenever you want a column, want to drop bombs in foreign countries for no reason we're on a war with them, I disagree with that. Trunk gets no special favour from me. Wait a commando raids and Yemen's and work to Saudi Arabia and drawn strikes, continue and it was over for me when officer I pulled out, but he's called for removing citizenship as a potential ramification of brain the flag in the past. So no, no, you don't get to complain about censorship of conservatives I was there was another tweet from Kansas. I don't think I've pulled up. You don't get to complain, Aragon here it is.

The open to complain about Sandridge about conservatives, but then get angry. That activists who don't like you, burn your symbols, that burning of that symbol should make. You should give you a sense of pride to a certain degree It reminds me of the pursuit of our future alma and this what's really sad to me because it I feel like the left, has lost their way, an episode of future alma. If you have a note, the show is an alien guy names or Burke its freedom day here in future you know you're, three thousand and cyber eats the earth can flag. It's basically american flag within sight of stars and earth. Everybody gets angry everybody how dare you and they chased him off and he says the eight as a symbol he ate it's because eating it is. It represents the freedom of the flag itself and there's one I who is all of the worst things in the world they make his lawyer. He sacrifice life and limb, are limb and

does life in wars, defending earth and defends or bugs right to eat the flag, making the point that he's right, the flat you know in the flag is another symbol that represents the freedom of that flag. And the guys like he's a cop, polygamous too, I've no matter what he says. Everyone hates em, but I M reminded of that- and I am reminded of what mainstream liberals were very much like. Yes, we understand this, we don't like it. We got it and now, where are we? The regressive left trying to censor speech because it offends them? Well, you know what I funded when someone burns the flag. Admittedly, I don't go into a rage or anything, I'm kind of a tepid individual. As most of you know what I'm like a man like you know, I just like the idea I dont, but you know what the right to do, what you do and so I disagree with that now say yeah, but you know what that's freedom and that's a good thing. Candace Owens someone's also treated one has limitations. You can't yell fire we fear, without consequence, you cannot yell Rachel. Epithets

at some without consequence, and if I were president, you sure I wouldn't burnt a flag without consequence, what they check this out. Even simply, the actors is greatest as we get it you're against free speech and would like more regulation, understood spot on this. Is I can leave. The countess always treated this, the first one seems like an open like just planet the Trump supporters, whatever constructs at it one of supporters we're like non and a bad take. This tweet is quite literally the regressive left argument and I was shocked to see Canada sweetness and unlike well. Ok, canvas, that's no! That's what the left argues. Consequence literally Everything you do as a consequence. Location we know is that you can't do act. But a consequence. Yet you can't literally walk outside without a consequence, it might rain on your part, my poop on you, you might get hit by a car. Yes, things happen when you do things ok, apparently I was educated by you guys you can yell fire in a movie theater, you can

It was actually a court ruling. I tweeted that together we can peeling to it where they said that, because it doesn't creative potential for direct harm, you can do So it's! U. I understood, but here's the thing to yelling fire in a movie. Is it's now a reference to incitement. So while this was, example. Does it make sense anymore? There is its use as more like an idiot, I suppose, but I will say this and this is wrong. Tromp is wrong. I can certainly understand the sentiment of not wanting someone to burn the flag, but now you have a right to do it and, admittedly I also understand why you dont want hate speech. I detest hate speech. Hate speech exists, a real thing. You know crowd or has the change my mind hates me so that real isn't real change my mind? Well, I suit yourself a legal standard is not real, but it can be defined as speech targeting you no specific, you know various groups based on certain characteristics,

to demean belittle, etc. I don't like the idea that someone would say this group is like you know is. Is this like an insult. That doesn't mean you can say something like on average people you know: nordic countries. Are this height? That's I hate speech talking General, like ethnic cat characteristic of the group, is not is not hate. Speech, saying something like on average people in South EAST Asia have black air. Yes, that's true, but ass. I hate speech what saying something like all people are acts and to some kind of insult, like all all all of group acts are, you know morons, I don't like it doesn't. Even I'd say You have a right to say, you're, stupid things, everybody does he have a right to be. Damn you write me crazy. That's just life so no, I don't agree with Candace. I don't agree with Trump. You can burn the flag as much as I don't like it. I recognize what it represents and I like what it represents. So it's a it's a it's a paradoxical emotion. I would say, because in time, you are destroying a symbol of something I appreciate while creating a symbol,

something I also appreciate. So kind of leads me to tap a position where I say you know what, let's just to find expression. Let's keep in mind. That anybody, who wants to say they should be allowed to burn the flag, but other people should be allowed to speak our hypocrites and, conversely, I dont, admittedly, follow canvas all that often. But if you're gonna complain about conservative censorship, but then say that no one another bit burn the flag, I'm not play that game. Ok you're wrong. I ll leave it there. I like that common from even supplee, though I got one more story coming up for a few minutes, and I will see you shortly. I believe this may be the first time. I've ever talked about Taylor Swift because she's. Being slammed for doing they called pink, washing, washing is when corporations pretend to support the algae BT community and everyone thinks is complete. Certainty that no no! What really believes she cares about this, but I will say: I will say this: there is in fact a rumour that Taylor Swift, herself is gay. Just a rumour don't ask

me by thing it's interesting, because if that's true- and she really does want to like get involved and likes our talk about this and are attacking or for it meant that that's really sad, isn't it like you know, but I do want to act like she is. She is notorious for dating deeds and then like breaking up with em, rang songs about it. Well, there's an interesting story because we often see that's theirs. There's no real way to win right. Is it pink washing or are you actually supporting them well nigh to what you do yet you are doing something wrong because Obama calls it is, Mama, causing a circular firing squad. Romola, that's what it is, from the daily mail she's jumping on the queer bandwagon and trying to capitalize, often music fans, blast Taylor, Swift for her new pride fiend anthem and accuse the corporate star of exploiting gay culture for cash Yeah corporations do this and I would be surprised about the case before we get started them TIM S, accomplished on it, Once more, my work, the semi conscious.

Personal story, I guess that's, why gonna be fine, but if you want to support it, TIM S accomplished stone such donate share, subscribe, etc because I'm a comment, the engage it really helps, but that Yea make of the story, Taylor. Swift has been hit with backlash following the recent release of her pro algae BT. Q, single as detractors accuse the corporate pop star of jumping on the queer bandwagon to make a profit, the track titled. You need calm down was released last week to mark pride month and its lyrics positively reference gay active, organization. Glad the song Finally, heads out at anti algae, bbq sentiment with the lines can- troll, your urges to scream about all the people you hate, because she- never made anybody less game. Please answer really nice line, you not. I mean like if you wanna hate somebody here ears, here's the thing about hate speech right, your mother, do it! I don't like it, but I do not know how to do it. The what are things I hate him

is that if you really have a grievance with somebody over something articulated and talk about the actual idea, you're upset with, if you just arbitrarily hate somebody of their characteristics? Will then we're not gonna agree plan simple! Your lot doing right, your love hate, for you know, slackened like outline both freedom. While fans have been quick to pray, swift for being an allied to the community. Others are blasting twenty nine year old for what they believe is a cynical exploitation of queer culture so if has been the subject of iron, on social media, with hundreds of twitter users hitting out the new single tellers it has never been. All loud for the energy bt q I plus community before and now suddenly she's doing this on other celebrity jumping the queer Bandwagon and trying to capitalize off at one blasted we have another one says she jumped on the bandwagon of commercializing pride. Only It was safe to do so. Where was she five year ago. Ten, no Taylor, Swift. An ounce an album by an l gb.

How would you be the artist or even knows that? What glad is, but now TAT day through the first briquettes hope, my dear Lord, they like Dude Twitter, the nightmare good on good on Taylor. Swift, like you think about it. This way is you're not allowed to come out in support of the algae bbq community at any point now, because you didn't do it soon enough? Maybe she didn't know about it. Maybe now she's this learning. Their issues wants talk about and their attacking her for why would anyone want to come out for anyone in support of any group? If no matter what you do you get accused of all the wrong things? Might as well do it, but then they attack you for not doing it, see how this is insane. Isn't it so Ella may I see tell us which is trying to get that corporate pride campaign money on other. That is why our era that other uses accused swift of trying to make a corporate cash grab like the many brands who use pride theme promotions in order to sell their products. Yup, tell us with new Single is the corporate rainbow

Oh go of the music world. I cannot another stated its really funny about on. I cannot like the I can't even or I caught literally the Yom. Well, I ever of like our generation. It means nothing soon. Last week, Swift surprised vans by performing heard her hit shit. Get off at the stone wall in the New York, gave our work. Only regarded as the birthplace of the current gay rights movement? Her performance came just weeks before the fiftieth, anniversary of the Stone Wall Riots in which queer patrons clash with police officers setting off widespread protests. They say this one person tweeted Taylor, Swift, performance at stonewall, felt so exploitative. It made me sick more. Is turning in her grave and raising her middle finger at your there's, some, the other artists who are fighting for the community dont. Let these corporate made exploits represent. You wake up, Pham you, but you? U one like,

when you have Taylor, Swift, Pepsi, Oreo and Mcdonald's, cheering you want and changing their logos you one there are still bigots. Ok, there are still people who wore homophobic intransigent. All those things and I had again- I stress You'Re- allowed to be. I disagree with it. You know what you mean, but listen, listen, progress like gay marriage speed court, like always really great things, are happening. Why you ragging on Taylor, Swift, clap, you did it! Here's the thing about these, like activist, groups that are not necessarily algae but, like I work for non profits, I would have as a mission the mission can ever end because people's lives are the mission. Ok, so I've talked about the far left, regressive left as an auto immune disorder, I describe it as there was time bigotry was a serious problem. You know, like the all these different forms of bigotry, I wanna get. I understand the word bigotry and what it means misusing the caught in this kind of contacts represents allocates regional stuff Please, activists at we're or to stop your discrimination, and that was a good thing and

What happens when you do for the most part, stopover discrimination with, like the nineteen sixty four civil rights actin like the? U, no pay equality acted things like this. Well, you one, but the act. It was to define their life's fighting for this can't stop because they have nothing else, so they start attacking healthy cells, Taylor, Swift, performing for you and you want is the ultimate symbol of victory. One of them famous mainstream pop stars is now cheering for you, but the fight can't and the mission can't be over. This- must be some kind of symbol of hate exploited. That's, it is oppressors process. No, you won mainstream society to ties. Levels are now supporting you. Congratulations be happy about it. You know I'm going to me because, when I think back to like my family things, they were through with message nation laws today, when I think about you, know commercial, With mixed race families, on like we won, we really did we won we have our rights, we do have the fleeting.

Or I never experienced this. My aunt esters fought hard to make sure I had something they never did and they did it, and I will never resent that I will be. I will be happy about that, and certainly there are still people who are angry every time they see that mixed rice couple on tv. Well, you know what I certain We recognise that like date, that is its pandering lot of corporations. Do every single who mortal doesn't that it makes family, but I laugh about it. You don't mean on why gay men, you know what I can understand the pan like. I can criticized the pandering nature of what they're doing what you know. What it report represents that my family one, we are safe We have our rights, marriage, family, two generations of mysteries families. We did it. Why are they getting men, Taylor, Swift, you did it you one like went when you too, change their logo to the Rainbow flag there it is, they get majesty crowded? What Stephen crowded is so insane it's like that. That's it that's all about. Could you imagine trying to show

somebody, I'm somebody down for calling you gay when you call yourself gay, like Stephen Progress, a compilation of a bunch of things which were pat what impact the there were disrespectful comments in passing. And unlike whatever it's a dude saying, mean things welcome to real life. That's the worst! you have now I may say: oh, but it is, it makes the Euro What have you done to keep the secret any longer? Look? Who came to celebrate the fiftieth anniversary of stone Wall I'm just movement, you did it tell us. This year, cheering you on and now you're mad about it. I don't know if you're on about it, you know what Several social media users were less than impressed that swift. What defies as straight we'll take it the stage the venue, what's what what's wrong that, however sway It was joined by openly gay actor, Jesse Tyler, Ferguson, Stone Wall and he praised the pop for bringing attention to the issue of gay rights. Bravo, he said. We have to keep the secret any longer. Look who came to celebrate the fiftieth. First, we have Stonewall Taylor, Swift, you are a jam, thank you for everything you do and that's the right response.

Glad said you could be glad with a limited edition sticker. Invoking Taylor Swift lyrics from you need to calm down. They sell out quickly so reserve yours right now, you, like that's great glad and just a teller Ferguson are saying the right thing, you did it you one. Why would why? Would you be mad? Like that's really weird and my pain, they say. Meanwhile, since the singles debut lesters, less there's a glad to I'm busy news that they had received an influx of donations. Good news on this is what you know. What that there are some people who are never The problem is, is on the right people ignore Those who art or never happy on the right on the left. However, people are happy. They get articles, they listen to tv shows shut down, people lose their jobs, but listen if they can't even support their own. Three. Why would anyone listen to them and gradual?

actions. You got one the biggest pop starts perform for you and support your cause. You ve done it is the war over no, but most of it is, and there still pockets. I understand all that, but there are some people who will never be happy. This should show us one thing when those bad faith actors outcome. Planning about some tv show or some movies, my offensive joke their not being honest, they're lying they don't care, They just want to be angry, and this is your proof. I ll leave it there. That's right out. See you tomorrow at I am on this channel and for this in the past six thirty ish everyday.