A draft of Donald Trump executive order targeting big text. Censorship has been released, it may change and the time you're watching this video. He may have already signed it, but I gotta say I read through this thing, and it looks like Donald Trump- has just nukes big tech from orbit it smart I feel like a lot of the points made. An executive order makes sense, and this view, Well may prevent some online censorship. Now, of course, all the Pundits are lighting up across social media with their pay is about. What's gonna happen, I have Of mine- and I will say it now- they're all wrong- they're- all wrong I think people understand. What's really going out section, thirty for the most part, but I gotta George Town LAW, professor, who gives us his opinion, and it really does look like trumps executive order is correct. He is not, as they say, going to take away liability productions from social media companies per se, trumps executive order, author,

as is the absolutely and potentially the f tc to enforce existing law, that has long since been ignored, you see for the longest time We have dealt with social media censorship, mostly targeting conservative. Really good examples would be hashtag, learn to code and wrapper zoo, be being suspect. For saying o k, dude section, two: three: but he was not intended to protect platforms from removing that kind of content, but they do anyway. Because no one's been enforcing anything I don't want to mess the convict about to read you the news Sienna as CNN reports. It show you there. Of order and over what this man and, dare I say I think, in the next month or two we I don't see any dramatic changes, necessarily what we ve already seen Jack Dorsey, the Sea of twitter step up admit to presumably outside appears admitting to his mistake in fact checking the president the other day, because they put a fact check on trumped up

you can add a tall realising content, which is it, no way protected by section two thirty. The big question arises: our social media platforms, publishers or platforms right. I call him a platform. Now. That argument doesn't necessarily matter it kind of does in certain areas. It's basically, this CNN is a publisher. They choose what appears on their website twitter, is a platform. They let anybody sign up and post things within reason. Section two thirty has very clear guidelines, as to what twitter is allowed to remove and still remain a platform, but if twitter is editorializing Donald Trump tweets, which in no way violate any provisions of section two or no fall under the exemptions of section two thirty, then twitter even though, for the most part they are platform still cross over into publisher territory. Was that mean It means you can sue twitter for the things other people say long story

but we're hoping to get out of this executive order and may not happen is that twitter will be forced to oppose lawful and legal content and taking on things that violate certain rules. Yes, but they can't be and you for saying learned to code and they can't value for having nasty opinions. But let me let me give the full context first let's red with the New York Times, I'm three, it's CNN has to say I do want to show you some concern. If we're very much opposed to some of these changes and will go through what this means before we get started had TIM guest outcomes lashed on it. If you'd like to support my work, there are several wedge can give the best thing you could possibly do share this video. Why well Youtube suppresses content like mine, really doing they prop up mainstream media. The mainstream sources like CNN, get a front page access when dealing with certain issues like a good, dedicated section. Meanwhile, get removed from recommendations, one of them Hence our people really concerned about what Trump is doing with his executive order. I dont think

executive order is going to change this problem I faced, which means the only thing I ask of you is to share the video because it helps keep my channel going. It's it's the best marketing possible, however, If you want to watch, make sure you subscribe to channel the like button, the notification about, and let's get to the news, CNN reports Trump is set to announce the executive order against social media companies. I dont want to reach much of what they say because actually have the executive board for you- and I ll just give you the legit reporting but see it and be in bias. We already seen them coming out against this. I'm curious president trump to announce an executive order against social media companies on Thursday days effort, Twitter, called tourist tweets, potentially misleading mind you, those tweets were opinions. Twitter should not have been intervening. Draft executive order being prepared by the Trump Administration tests, the boundaries of the White House, his authority, in a long shot legal bed. It seeks to curtail the our of large social media platforms by reinterpreting a critical,

one ninety six law that shields websites and tech companies from lawsuits. Our two dramatic escalation by Trump and his war with tech companies, as they struggle with the growing power problem of misinformation on social media. The president, regularly accuse sites of censoring conservative speech. They do it's a fact We have more than enough evidence we have seen at noon, whereas exposes leaked emails, it is a fact that they do. This hashtag learn to code. It was admitted by Twitter is higher ups to me personally and the european project that perhaps they were a little too aggressive in policing a hashtag learned a code. Not familiar. Conservatives were essentially mocking journalists who had written stuff these four years saying that coal mines, to lose their jobs, just learn how to complete programme computers to find new jobs. So journalists started getting laid off. A lot of people said: learn to quote some people used it in a non in a neutral.

Reference like actually just referencing the fright itself, meaning you there and twitter, and you could say I'm confused as to why hashtag learn Dakota so offensive boom you get banned and a lot of people did that. Arguably, According to this new executive order, would not be exempt, and this the call from reclaim that they have provided us with the actual draft of president Tom Social Media censorship, executive order for those from We can, then that is a site that deals with issues of censorship. I'm not going to read all of it, but I'll read as much as I can buy the authority vested in as president by the constitution and the laws United States of America, including the federal property and Administrative Services ACT of nineteen, forty nine as amended. It is here by ordered as follows: free speeches, bedrock of american democracy. Our founding fathers protected the sacred right with the first amendment to the constitution, underscoring the freedom to it press and debate ideas is the foundation for all of our rights as free people, the amount

budgets and growth of online platforms in recent years raises important questions about apply The ideals of the first amendment to modern communications technology? day. Many Americans follow the news. Stay in touch with friends and family and share our views and current events through social media and other online platforms. As a result these forms function in many ways as a twenty first century, equivalent of a public square stop right there. That is not trumps opinion that comes from a Supreme court ruling, let's written as president made clear my commitment to free and open debate on the internet. Such debate is just important online as it, in our universities, are businesses, our newspapers and our homes. It is essential sustaining our democracy, country that has long cherished the freedom of expression. We cannot allow a limited number of online platforms to hand picked the speech that Americans may access. And convey online. This practice is fine. The on american and anti democratic, when large Our full social media companies sensor opinions with which they disagree. They exercise a day

Europe's power online platforms. However, are engaging in selective censorship is hurting our national discourse. Tens of thousands of Americans have reported among other troubling, behaviors online platforms, flagging candidates in appropriate, even though it does not violate any data terms of service, making, unannounced and unexplained changes to policies that have the effect of this, favouring certain viewpoint and the leading conduct an entire accounts with no warning, no rationale and no recourse. At the same time. Social media platforms are invoking inconsistent, irrational and groundless justifications to censor or otherwise punish american speech here at home. Several online platforms are proper from and promoting the russian and disinformation spread by foreign governments like China, Google, for example, credit, search engine for the Chinese Communist Party, which blacklisted searches for human rights, hit data on favor,

well to the Chinese Communist Party and tracked users determined appropriate for surveillance. Google has also established research partnerships in China that provide direct benefits to the chinese military for their part. Facebook and twitter have accepted advertisements paid for by the chinese government that bride, false information about China's mass imprisonment of religious minorities. Twitter is also amplified Chinese China's propaganda abroad. Including by allowing chinese government officials to use its platform to undermine pro democracy protests in in Hong Kong. Now we get to the policy portion where we get a bit more in the weeds. This is very important in I'll. Try out I'll do my best to break down section to protection against arbitrary restrictions. A is the policy of United States to foster clear on discriminatory ground rules, promoting free and open debate on the internet problem

among those rules, is the immunity from liability created by section two thirty of the communications decency act. It is the policy of the United States at the scope of that immunity should be clarified. I ll just give you quit just, and I will read through this. There are specific provisions in section two, thirty that guarantee twitter Facebook Youtube won't be sued. If I say something, that's defamatory or in other ways causes trouble. That leads to a legal problem. However, there's cod guidelines as to what they can remove and they clearly violated. Let's ridden section. Two hundred and thirty was designed to address court decisions from the early days of the internet, holding that an online platform that engage in any editing or restriction of content posted by others thereby became itself a publisher of the content and could be liable for torts. Like defamation, As the title of section two thirty makes clear, the provision is intent

to provide liability protection to a provider of an interactive computer service such as an online platform like Twitter, that engages in quote good samaritan blocking of content when the provider deems the content in terms of sub section. Two thirty see two eight obscene lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively, violent, harassing or otherwise objectionable, subjection to thirty broadly states that no provider of an interactive computer service shall be treated as a publisher or speaker of content provided by another person, but sub section. Thirty see two qualifies that principle when the provider at its the content provided by others, sub paragraph c to specifically addresses protections from civil ability and clarifies that a provider is protected from four liability when it acts end, quote good faith to restrict access to content that it considers too, be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent hurrah.

Or otherwise objectionable. That provision does not extend to deceptive or protects jewel actions restricting online content or actions inconsistent with an online platform. Service, when an interactive computer service provider removes or restricts access to content and its actions do not meet the criteria. Criteria of sub paragraph c to aim it is engaged in editorial. Conduct by making itself an editor of content outside the productions of some Paragraph c, two: eight such a provider forfeits any protection from being, aimed a publisher or speaker under Sub section, two thirty see one which properly applies. Led to a provider that merely provides a platform for content supplied by others. It is the policy of United States that all departments and agencies why section two thirty see according to the interpretation set out in the section. Let me try and break this down and tell you what they'll then be doing

the Wall Street Journal the New York Times they choose, which content appears on their front page. They have employees, they pay them There is almost no user generate content, perhaps may be other than comments. The New York Times will not be held liable for what someone in a comment section says: that's best go to. Thirty is trying to to do. However, they specifically outline its in good faith and the content is considered to be abstain, lewd lascivious, filthy, excessively violet, rising or otherwise. Objectionable would end one consider the wrappers dubious tweet o k due to fall in line with any of those provisions, their eyes The answer is no: if you're not familiar zoo we as a rapprochement. Twitter responded to someone in a political and a political debate. Saying ok, dude like just basically end The conversation like ok do, however, they apparently invest to be some kind of hate speech, and so they

splendid his account. That seems to be completely editorial and I do not believe any reasonable person a court or could justify how that falls under objectionable behavior. I mean it certainly not about it's not Lou, lascivious, filthy. It's not violent. It's not here, passing at all. What trump is basically saying with this is that. If these are the terms set forth, then the c c needs to start enforcing these, and that means people should be a be able if, if we get this clarification to sue Twitter in the event that they engage in this behaviour, long story short twitter will have to make a choice. It will probably be on a case by case basis, but Twitter, Youtube and Facebook could risk losing their protections if they start editorializing content. Take a look at what Donald Trump too, in terms of mail in voting the other day, Don tromp sad! You know! There's

a way that mail in voting doesn't leader, widespread voter fraud and opinion predicting the future. Of course, there's no in fact check that it's a statement about what he thinks will happen in the future, but Twitter decided to add a tag to his tweet thus editorializing well beyond the scope of what actually a protected here's. What I want I want to clarify this rate is very, very complicated. I am not a lawyer. What if the protection is based on someone posting a comment right then you certainly, wouldn't argue that a commenter publishes for the New York Times. However- what? If the New York Times goes in and starts editing, the comments made by people will now you can argue that there actually working with those comments as part of their general publication. Of course, there's a very A strong argument, Workin here, a lot of back and forth, but just because Twitter has hundreds of millions of users they dont regulate, doesn't mean that they are not a publisher. Like the New York Times

The argument ultimately becomes marking in its. I gotta admit this fucking get confusing some people left have argued, is actually the first amendment that protects social media platforms from having to allow anyone to speak. They argued this way. If I have a company in my companies what's up a sign in the window, and I liked some people put. Signs in the window, and, let me know I have let everyone put up a sign in the window However, if your argument is that sex, if your argument is that the enforcement section, two thirty would violate the first amendment. Dare I say section: two thirty is violated. The first moment from the outset and would need to be revoked. Interestingly, Joe Biden himself has called for the four revoking out to section two: thirty outright see he's in the context of section two thirty we can see at the New York Times. He says it should be revoked. It should be revoked because it is not merely an internet company referring to Facebook is propagating falsehoods. They know to be false.

We should be setting standards, not unlike the Europeans, are doing relative to privacy, what we are seeing here is that Democrats want to remove this protection because they do view Facebook, Twitter, you tube, etc as publishers of that content, if, that's the case and that the view of the Democrats, then it doesnt matter of two thirty exists, section: two: thirty: is it supposed to be protecting them at all? There's no reason to revoke two hundred and thirty. If these companies are operating outside the confines of what the protection is supposed to be there for, what Trump is saying should be getting fanfare from everybody because think about it, means that they're they're not going to be protected from civil liability. They know and help falsehoods. It also means that they'll have to choose to allow people to speak freely, no matter what, Of course. I think the real issue for many Democrats is that fake news whose misinformation or information

that generally proves them wrong is out of their control and they want Facebook to delete things that make them look bad. There's a lot. It's gonna happen a core linked to this? They want within thirty days the anti the eye. The national Telecommunications Information Administration to file a petition for rule, make with the FCC requesting that the FBI absence the expeditiously proposed regulations to clarify that conditions under which an action restricting access to or availability of me real is not taken in good faith within the meaning of sub. A rough see to aid of section to thirty. Take a look. The conditions under which such actions will be considered to be deceptive, protects or inconsistent with providers terms of. Arrest. He also goes on, however, and says there could be issues with deceptive practices and changing of terms of service. I cannot get rid of it.

Higher thing, because I can't make an hour long, video, you know, but I'll do my best to give you the gist of it if it. So, if a platform like Youtube, tells you hear the rules you can come and and build your business. Indeed, and do your thing, but then arbitrarily in violation of those rules, suspends you shut you down or due to public pressure shut. You down, you could argue, that's just active because you had essentially a contract with the company. They are violating now, of course, money. These companies actually say that can ban you for any reason right. You can try. You're probably loose in the end. What I think happiness? They there may be clarifications here. This probably won't do a whole lot. People we try to start suing. Twitter and Facebook, for Liability issues and if their protections are in question, it ultimately could be a very, very bad thing for everyone. I don't know it's gonna happen: Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, etc. There too big to fail? So, ultimately, what is happening as they better stop

Removing legal speech like hashtag learned to code and allow people to say their opinions. Otherwise, well bill really lose all of those protections. This is the hope Let me show you. I believe I retreat from Count Dracula. He said if they choose up to be a platform. It means people like Alex Jones, and many other people have been banned, could possibly come back. Opinions and comments that could get you band like learn to code, wouldn't be banipal offences anymore. And angular right on that, though I don't necessarily think it will. Be an issue of one or the other. I think object. I think it will be a case by case basis, but It involves their liability protection, so it could ultimately just be as Daniela US sees it that as soon as twitter steps over I end by editorializing the president's tweet. They live, it was those protections in which case they just don't do it Jack made it

very, very serious mistake and I'll show you this mark Zuckerberg Knox Twitter for fact checking trumps as private companies shouldn't be the arbiter of truth. Yet well, Facebook runs a fact, checking arm that goes in and smacks labels on things so their granting that power, and they should not it stuff man, because you got a lotta. People spend a lot of nonsense on Facebook, making money too we'll Jack Dorsey of Twitter chimed in he said there is what ultimately accountable for our actions is accompanying. That's me: please leave our employees out of this will continue to point out incorrect or disputed information about elections globally, and we will admit to and on many that many mistakes we makes This does not make us an arbiter of truth. Our intention is to connect the dots of conflicting statements. And show the information in dispute. So people can judge for themselves more transparency from us as critical yeah yeah yeah Jack made a glorious, glorious, mistake, it was one of the most epic failures of policy

I have ever seen and I made it at a time when Donald Trump and conservatives are looking for a reasonable approach to dealing with censorship. You added the content. Of a non rule, breaking tweet that falls under none of like in none of the provisions of section two thirty. It was trumped giving us in about mail in voting, not objectionable, not lewd, not lascivious, violated. Now An of your rules at all trump didn't make a statement of fact he an opinion. You can argue you can't mislead people bought elections, but tromp was giving its opinion what friends. Is Jack Dorsey, put attack on that tweet, which linked to the opinions of other people and there it is. You have just forfeited your entire argument, in Patterson New Jersey right now, I live in New Jersey, a member alive of the end of a lazy p in the state, has called for an election to be outright cancelled because of widespread voter. Fraud, allegations and corruption charges. The vote was

done by melon ballot, and there are a whole lot of inconsistency signatures don't match. People are being disqualified. Packs of votes are just being discovered. And so it's even the and double icy peace, and we got to do this over Jack. Dorsey saw trumps opinion and decided to at a Tory ally's it by linking to the millions of other people who don't like him in no way was that fixing misleading information, Jack and his team. Think they know better. They think they're, smarter they're, not I'm not saying is it a dig against him like that? You know what I'm saying They literally see trumps tweet and say that's incorrect, its being disputed. Therefore, we should add context. We should add a tory allies. We should add a sentence to what some one else said on the platform that immediately cry

since them over outside of section two to thirty provisions? It was a huge mistake and of course it was exactly what Trump needed to say there. It is. They have now added a sentence to my tweet. They have added my tweet. They have changed text of what I have published. That is what the New York Times does. That is not what an at an open platform does so we'll see what this leads to, but I believe now you could actually argue. With or without the executive or that based on the actions of Jack Dorsey. They have just forfeited section, two thirty protections They are actually editing the content of the users there determining what appears will need lawsuits before things can change. But let's take a look at some of that. Some some comments from some experts will be better context Randy born at is a Georgetown law. Professor said whatever Lee

implications. May result. It seems that both twitter and You spoke our online publishers in competition with other publishers for Our ties and enables the fact they regulate their content only furthers ought further underscores this. They are not, and I M P, like Comcast or our CN. If they're, not publishers with First amendment rights, then perhaps they are closer to common carriers who have a duty not to discriminate Georgetown LA professor. He makes up a really great point: Facebook, Twitter and Youtube. Yes, you two or Income petition to sell advertisements? Well, that's what newspapers do they are actually regulating? The continent appears their platform simply because they dont have strong editorial guidelines, doesn't mean there aren't editorial guidelines there. Are you past rules on what we were allowed to say about the pandemic. They gave us added Torreon guidelines They actually sell ads and split. The money who have us Youtube is playing a very

a very dangerous game my livelihood is Youtube. I've been very successful and I'm very fortunate, but I'll be the first to admit. Youtube is very likely to be a publisher. The same any other service simply because they allow me to be on their platform Romeo only terrorism, they review channels, to determine whether or not you get access to cash, in which case there is a strong argument that they're just accompany hiring people. I would not be happy with it. I'll tell you what you'll be very, very for me and my livelihood, but the argument stance. They are competing with the New York Times. They have a large group of people who produce content, the company themselves adds against it, Seventy adds I just get paid based on the ads that come in. It's gonna be a really wild ride. Moving forward and a lot of people are gonna like it. I know I probably wouldn't it could be the end of my youtube. Gentle we'll see others plays out. Ben Shapiro chimed in saying here is the inevitable effect of destroying to thirty of the CD ate all comments, actions will be taken down, no website

has the resources to actively at all comments in order to show themselves from liability and no webs is willing to leave comments entirely standards free. The invitation to redefine unfair business practice to include comment policing base lawsuits will likely not and well for concern but, as I see the appeal, but I'm wondering just why conservatives are suddenly so unconcerned about political bias among regulators, but I will add, I dont think it matters removal of section two thirty trumps executive order. I think the FAO Does there hasn't been a strong legal case brought to a judge to point out the fact Twitter says, publish on our platform and we urge the plan I'm right, but twitter cells advertisements on this platform. Now the difference between you know Youtube and twitters that twitters pay you They do monetize the contact, your producing, which would be no differently.

They are now the habit and poster Forbes who are publishers and our live a long story short when the Washington Post says something they're, the ones who said it. If they defend they can be sued. Twitter makes money off of our content, they choose who gets to appear and who gets to publish content. They will remove you for saying things like ok dude. Clearly they have oil guidelines. Therefore, what's the difference between Twitter and the Huffington Post- and I mean that literally Stan? You could point out solid differences like well above and oppose they write articles and twitter microblogging site. I don't care Dobbin imposed around, allows users to post and so does Buzzfeed. What's the difference you could Bob interposed has the same protections for sure, but they do at the content. Ok, twitter has now stepped into that game and directly edited Donald Trump tweet. Well there you go there now, one degree into that same territory. I also have sweet from Robbie slavic. He says the the consequence of removing library. Protection would be social meat,

companies, censoring more speech not less order, is about us waging trumps bruised ego, not protecting free speech. In fact, if your goal was to force twitter to take more aggressive action against Trump and against edgy rightwing speech, What you would do us spend the liability protection say goodbye to tweets implicitly accusing Joe Scarborough of murder. In fact, this is part of the reason at many progressives of the others with war and variety, are adamantly in favour of removing the liability protection as well as Joe Biden. Here's what I think we need. I think we need these companies to stop banning legal speech. That should be the standard, many people are speaking out against. You know these changes and this enforcement. I don't agree with that. Necessarily. The executive order may work. It may actually tell Twitter, don't ban. You know lawful speech and set your rules too. To be.

Such that would mean that someone could be on twitter and say really really awful things like really nasty racist things and they couldn't get rid of it same for you to it. Could it would mean that they can ban. My videos, when I say a name, its lawful speech, is protected incentivize them to be hands off, but it would not mean they would ban more. It means they would ban less that way they don't get sued. The biggest problem right now is that section two thirty has not been clarified, trumpets see to do that and enforce the law? Under this? I have no. I yeah how that will play out. We what we can only see, but let me just wrap it up with us in the end. Probably nothing will happen. I mean it. I really really do I'm nothing will happen. It would be devastating from you know. If, if it's ok, I think nothing will happen. I really don't I just I see it. The courts have ever have struck down so many lawsuits and executive order, while its clever, won't necessarily dude

thing, but it will be interesting to see how the FCC seeks to regulate certain content. But this really is about liability protection, so even if the FCC determines that's what actually operate this way. It may be that, starting, you know what once we have cc says here. The clear definitions of lascivious of objectionable. Okay dude clearly is not upon. It is not in their twitter than says. Ok from now on, we won't ban legal speech. That would be the best outcome will see out plays out. Little longer for it today, but stick around I've got more videos coming up at six p m youtube com, slashed him cast news and I'll see you all Last night we saw some of the worst riding we have seen in the past decade, especially as it pertains to black lives matter. I've in too many of these rights. I was in Baltimore out in Saint Louis several times. I've been many different cities, like New York, witnessing protest. I've seen them

escalate into full on riots, and these are some of the worst images I have ever seen. They torched several buildings, one of the buildings, was low income, housing just burned to the ground. You can see on the screen, they looted a target. Now If we get a lot of crazy stuff that comes out of this to purely as early this target so old lady and a rascal shows up with a knife or something and then people's fight. Whether this is just full on crazy Some one in one video to chain saw walking around the city. Why and people are losing it. A lot of people are making the joy about the balloon stuff, like that we saw Auto zone burned down and yeah things are going crazy, but here is more the crazy lorries. Now I got her. I gotta, I gotta remind you, be careful with this preliminary stuff. The news is still coming out. There still image is emerging in the past, like twenty minutes to an hour of fires, burning it's the aftermath of the rise and people are still out, there were out all night but one

These stories that has come out, which will need to be fact, check, mind you is that Do people tried loading upon shop, The owner was havin, none of it and the owner was armed with a rifle in these two people got shot more videos emerged where people are claiming. The cops may have actually killed another guy, maybe pretending to these rights. I'm sorry this right. Now, all this stuff you're. Seeing in my experience, I have covered the stuff I think it's gonna get worse, listen! It's Thursday! That was Wednesday night. That's not even a weekend now. People are seeing all this and I'll. Tell you what our mission amount say it on and ultimately a lot of what a lot of those lefties angry. This is not about justice I assure you it is not you now. I know because I've actually interviewed these people, but an hour long documentary about the stuff. I've gone down His communities and I've asked them and I'll tell you what happens almost every single time when I was in Ferguson, there was a group.

Young black men guarding liquor store from looters, and you know it. They told out that I next standing them as they talk to your rapporteur from Al Jazeera was now with vice news. And they said these- people writing, aren't from our community they're coming from outside the community and they make their take their operative Yes, they just want to steal from us and destroy our community. That's what he said this was talking to your rapporteur and he said that, people who are running in these buildings. They don't actually care about justice, and then you end up with these people. There is, I think, was the new republic. A much are some lefty publication that wrote an article called in defence of looting or something like this I'll. Tell you what men, opportunism, UK people know that when large protests form they can make that sparked for a riot. Word allows them to take the opportunistic move. Stealing and looting.

You did I see when I see these rights. Very few people want justice. Very few could think about it for subversive foremost, You have a story about George Floor, which may mean many of you are probably familiar with This guy should not have died, and it's me on that- these cops need to be charged, in my opinion, Stan were still waiting for information. So we gotta be call about these things about tell you what we, watch. The video of a man saying please, please, please, I can't breathe, they could have just moved yeah. Some people have said, but TIM that's a trick. They do to try to escape. The dude was not struggling, said: please, I've been a situation where our coughed by the cops outside is at a protest Louis and I said several times over in Oregon. Pardon me, sir. Pardon me, sir. Pardon me, sir. These costs are cutting off my circulation, innovation, the cap him up, listen about for me and walked away that simple so of Europe tell me that this dude lying on the ground, saying please I can't breathe and that cop couldn't get me off his neck now you're wrong, brow

you, can argue that is due to all all the worst thing in the world, but you know what in the end, he was deprived of basically every constitutional guarantee that was set forth in this. Great nation, so you want to argue about. You know what went down. Even if Wanna. Tell me this duty did something wrong now, I'm this way the case of someone fighting in running away or pulling a weapon anything. It was a case of a man on the ground, just saying please and then They all came out from across the street showing you wasn't resisting. Some people try to claim But I'll tell you what men I watch that video he's just either looks like he's grumbling and is walking with the police. He gets near the car and then it seems he made it may have fallen over something, even if you want to argue what we see this video is resistance. What passive he say, Eve Eve all down saying now. You gotta pick me up that happens all the time it doesn't justify any It happens. This is this is, in my opinion, we are as close to a clear cut case. We can get an I got flag for the Ahmed Armoury stuff people.

Your honor, but no I want evidence is not so clear cut. Will this to me is simple: Maverick a you're, never to see me cheerleading for agents of the state taking someone's life, even if you think he did something wrong innocent until proven guilty. So I'll tell you, what's really bugging me about all of this is that you actually you have on social media high profile supporting conservatives going for there are, then I am saying it was straight up. Cold, blooded, murder- and, unlike I mean you, have your opinions. I agree. I think this is wrong, but they got they got their own harden and then we see these left. Acting like conservatives are ignoring and unlike non, would you would you what you say and are you Are you the following these people, these bit that the conservatives are and agree with you there, Ruth riding That's where the line drawn the writing. Has nothing to do, in my opinion, with justice, with with doing the right thing

The writing is a combination of boredom rage. Laziness. Greed, I know because I've seen it, they do a lot of people us What will deal with the issue of right? That's the one. That's actually people might say, said, there. Are there met about this nano nano, though not met about this. Many of them are the protein. Just come out for sure are mad about this. I think we're all met about this, like ninety nine, Kind of people are mad about this, but the people Who is that that that the people were actually mad about it? Who mace In writing, or or protests in whatever are a tiny fraction. You get a protest of several hundred people, they're all mad, only a few of them have the rage to spark a riot. The people who come and start burning buildings to the ground there, not calling for joy just. By doing it, I'll tell you this. You could disagree with me, but you are wrong. You can have your opinion, I get it but you're wrong. You know why they burn burned down low income housing. How is that

bout justice there that the taxpayer of funds- been dedicated to helping people who couldn't afford houses and they burned to the ground, not about justice, just boredom and rage The people were angry, maybe they don't know our right, that's fair to say maybe maybe didn't know they're burning down, affordable housing, but come on man. How do you what we eat you thinking stealing a tv is about justice yeah, that's it. They write the left. Right in defence of looting. Looting is the poverty class stealing from the upper nice that I'm not even a man, not you're you're full of it. It is a desperate attempt. Justify the people exploiting these communities, so those people in Ferguson they do what their stores looted they didn't want there Business is destroyed. It sets their community back. It sets their wealth back and ensures that their kids won't have something to build and grow into inherit. That's what recent. They were mad

I'll say some really crazy. Some of the people down a ferguson when I was there during the initial start of the of the of the riots, A lot of them thought it was. A conspiracy may actually thought it was a conspiracy that police were starting riots on purpose to make. Because they knew the riots would destroy the community. As a people told me not, I don't believe it, but they did and and and whether or not you know you want to believe it. It doesn't matter what matter does that they think this is what's happening to their community, so excellent limber. Let me bring it down for you as an Ferguson, and there was a group of people is a big protests in the street right on it was on West orison, large your people and they were doing nothing a lot of stand around and musicals playing the There is an initial spark one night a gas station was burned down and then through it was so I fly out and through this these next few days. People, mostly just standing in the street- Nobody was looting or riding on like that. Other side one day it's at night, one?

walked out of the group and just walks over an shocks. Will some kind of flash bang at people boom less, but that the shock breaks people out anxiety. Spikes peoples are running around all crazy. He was screaming at the police and then again, of people, run straight to the dollar, store and smashed the windows and go right in, and it was up. It was. I that's the catalyst it's like that's the reason why people believed it was on purpose, What about asking people like did something happened like? Why did the cops throw that Flash bank no idea? I have no idea just walked over and threw it like. What would you do that? I don't think it could be a million things could be one bad person, just ruin a flashback. Somebody gets his bore. Aren't always is evil call what everyone some of those people thought was on purpose. The recent I bring that up is because these people, who are looting and writing what justice are they seeking the got, the cops rarity

fired, the FBI's already investigating trumps, called it out and said he's directing especial investigation into it like every everybody is on your side to get rid of these. These cops lock, em up, we cannot. We cannot function, police for minor infractions for four for any infraction would Andrew I've on the spot. If you it takes account of custody responsible for their health. Now understand things can get difficult I understand I hear cop say like you know what, if someone's arms, dangerous job I get it, but not the duties on the ground. Just ain't- please please, please got to be. Standard right will now. These cops are going to get in trouble, we'll see, what extent I don't like the idea of these guys, hitting overcharge simply because of mob mentality. But I certainly this video on. Like I don't see any one hour, I don't see any defence of that none whatsoever, because even like look, even if this guy had done something, I went when you have someone controlled and in custody and their begging for four.

Life. You need for eight minutes and other dude dead, this I was apparently one for forgery of all the things you kidding me a non violent crime, you we try and do not try to defraud someone the fraud somebody money yeah man but think about when it comes forgery like the fund. A system as as insurance and stuff. You know I mean it's tough. Really is bound to show you some stuff man. There's so much talk about ice cube, tweeted out the other day. How? How long before we strike back, you says how long How long will we go for blue on black crime before we strike back nine hundred and fifty four a dot m yesterday morning, ice cube, you got your wish. Bro people went out, make torch stuff. They lit ever thing up. I hope I hope you realize what you are asking for, because this is not what you want to see these people don't seem to understand. None of these people do you d want to live in this? You don't want you to want to see this.

And what scares me now is. As we talk about the Google in the breakdown of all staff man, you got the the powder keg to end all powder kegs. We're still in a lockdown. Ok, things are being with the restrictions are being lifted. Businesses coming back, but people are hot hot tempered. You haven't you eat, you, have you have poured powder into this king and then with a spark. It lights up. What happens is something interesting, I'm I'm hearing from so am I you know like right, Lib friends in some raw right wingers. They dont support the police. Why they use to. You know why, in these big cities, these cops for enforcing unconstitutional decree by the governors, and so there are like to these cops. It's amazing one of these comments were there like. I, like the good cops, I don't like the cops that are enforcing unconstitutional decrees, happens. Yell got fired for saying you refused to do it So now you're seeing pro cops unto me has dwindled because this mistrust

police are showing up to a gym near my house, and there they arrest a guy because you wanted the Jim had his people are not too happy with it It's mostly urbanization has mostly urban police forces on the IRA pod guess I do somebody mentioned some- interesting sang anymore. The super jets that conservatives like least because in small towns you actually do have officer friendly its AL from down the street? You know who the cops are Youtube that there's this relatively you, you know them by name: that's it! That's the housing to deal the community all the time, and so it's closer connections in big These they bring in cops from one area to another area so that they don't they How that I guess so there's no communal ties of the cops just don't care about what happens this. This leads to cops coming out, so it at the Jim it would near where I live called analysed. Someone told me. They believe the cops for enforcing these lock this lock in the gym they won't. Even for near nearby. They brought the cops.

From somewhere else, because they knew local cops, would not forces against their local businesses, because who wants to be ostracised think about it. If Europe how can you live in this area and there like? We I should go enforce unconstitutional degree. You're gonna be like do that. I oh that she have like no way do. I can't do that to the brain people who have to worry about it and that creates huge problems. So I'm watching this video man- this is crazy in LOS Angeles, our nor by the story pulled up. I think I do somebody ah fuck what car was trying to move through the highway avoidable jump on top of the car, the cars it's way. Someone falls down its knocked out. I guess peoples are banging on another cop car they're going nuts, I'm thinking to myself all these big city cops who are enforcing unconstitutional lockdown. They should We are going to regret it. Absolute gonna, write about as you will hear losing what don't that that support them in fact- and I was always there for you, it's funny. It's funny really is

Look at the sweet from Sarah Sovereign, the sort the left doesn't understand. These leftist. Don't talk to conservatives don't talk to what the right is actually saying. She said police It's your gas into a peaceful protest of George of George Floods murder, but stood like the queen's guard, while white ales with guns store The state capitol protests having to wear a mask in a pandemic. We live. Into America's, and if this doesn't make it clear, you're a dummy in. Let me stop your at their says. Omen. One group was he's fully like I guess, they're going there, temperatures checked they were legally and peacefully and calmly and slowly walking. However, she brings up a good point, a point that I said is quite possibly vague. Greatest to a argument I have ever seen yeah. Why is it peaceful protesters come up

and the cops just our fire and tear gas and being bags, and some people say that the protesters started. They started a right and it's like regardless, regardless do what you think would happen if the people Europe, and they were armed. It could get worse for sure, but it makes it makes you think right. I got another one, though this person said unarmed, black and brown folks, getting tier guessed by the police were protesting, lament limit when it limits like I could get going to your gas by police are protesting. The murder of a black man by the police versus heavily armed white people. Being allowed to take over a state capital because they want haircuts So this is the kind of nonsensical an unnecessary lie. What those people agree with you do like those of the people. Saying give me liberty or give me death recognised. The constitutional rights of this George Flagman, with what we're stripped from it from him and that he was killed, Is that not all of them? I'm sure not, although many people I disagree, the most of the sentiment. I've seen from like the white too,

a people are like. We have a right the due process and although they might go as hard as the left, the left is like cold blooded murder. These people are like, while that cop was responsible for that person's life so here you have an opportunity to reach out a hand and say: hey man. Will you will you how, was this guy's rights were deprived and they pay probably say yes, many of them, but then you go out and riot. Smash windows burn target down this Are things get really really weird things get really weird man. If there's gonna be a booger Lou, as like people say I thank you all, the right tacitly now in line with the government in its weird because you'd think what the unconstitutional lockdown you'd think with the violation of their rights they wouldn't but there's a line. The line is when protesters burn, affordable, housing to the ground, you're not going to get conservatives on your side with that one, the line is when they burn at target, they looted the steel tvs, you've lost the conservatives

crazy man. It seemed like there was a real opportunity where something is happening where you ve got this pent up rage over the unconstitutional lockdown, where the right was angry but with the government and angry with police and the worst thing that the left could be doing. Right now is insulting those who are also in this fight against what they view is unconstitutional degree maternity store. I loved on the story, said Occupy Wall Street near two guys and both black and one guy, Was- was yelling sang to alter the black people, don't stand with them; they don't stand with you. You know like these. People have ignored, often ignored our plight, blah blah blah and as other black, says: YO, YO, YO, no man, none of those you do it you, don't you do You reach out to them shake their heads. I welcome to the fight now you get it. Don't you maybe now people really do get it. Maybe in big cities you have cops at are bad cops, maybe in smaller jurisdictions. The cops aren't that bad

and this urban vs rural divide really changes the way people view what the police really are. Like I look, New York City and I see stoppin frisk, which was spent typically targeting black communities, was specifically a gun control measure and unlike come on guys, we can together on this one right, the police were owing to mostly low income minority areas, Michael Bloomberg, himself? It was about race. He did it, like some Bloomberg. They were going for young people because they're looking for weapons. The violation of arguable violation of secondment, depending on how far you go with your view of second moment, you think its absolute, then you ve got adult in these areas with a right to carry their their firearm and the police can come in and take young people from from events, a wall and then to justify. Then of rational for nonsense. You have disproportionately affair. Did the minority community in this regard in New York City eurobonds, protesters saying they hate cops

why they live in a city where the cops don't live near them, don't care about them and disproportionately target minority communities as blunt bloom, its own words and the go to a rural area and you get people those poor among their own business and there's a smaller group of cops, local county sheriff some Debbie's and they now o them and their luggage he's a good guy. That's unfair here, I think it's like men, maybe we can start seeing people come together once again, but unfortunately it's just probably not the case as unfortunate, because it's the left it. Look. This is why this is why I have the bias. I do. Ok, that's why point the direction that I do these people or are on necessarily dragging a bunch of conservative and libertarian, protesters, support trump when they probably agree with you. I may not polluting the writing, but seen anybody cheer for the police on this one imaginative leftists. The first thing they did was had some like a high profile blacklist activist reach,

to sum up, right, wing, protest organization and said: will you march with us this man's rights were violent? You probably within a yes and then you'd have these guys and these guys marching together defending the causes using the findings of our civil liberties, its enemies, unfortunate. That couldn't be the case. People hate each other, more than actual ate them put. The problem really is like I look at this. This tweet with twenty two thousand retweet or Sarah Self Romans with seventy thousand, and I ask you this: I too to these left us. These guys standing on a state capital with with we with their guns. What did they do to you he's our police officers that these people were protein? thing. The cops and the cops were resting money of under these protests. What did these regular Americans, due to you, nothing man? What are you disagree on politics like the policy. We should act for for the economy. I tell you what it's it's. It's

the easiest way to divide the people who aren't in power and that's it we're getting gum What more called these people racists and Bates yeah yeah? I know what she's doing the law thing she wanted was the black lives matter, it has to be like hey constitutional lists. We need your help on this one. That's the last thing she wanted. The government. Overreached took a man's life. What do we do the violation of its fifth amendment right at the least its violating life liberty, the pursuit of happiness at the worst and while our sights in terms of legal and illegal legal issues- and you could even argue central racism involved. So, got this issue that I think people can overlap on the guy Governor Whittemore is Michigan my life, where these producers were she isn't she doesn't want it so she wants to make everyone thinks there bigots makes your people are divided at the bottom, so that no one can t what what the real problem is: the violation of our rights from government actors, be it the pole, he's too, don't care about you or the governor. Enforcing unconstitutional decree knows what things get scared

like I mentioned em out of a few minutes ago, think, because of alluding to the writing? These people are now tacitly be on the side of government, not because they support the government is doing, but because they are so you're seeing people just burn the city to the ground and because of that people on a site you can't and there Bigger threat now unfortunate. I guess what what I mean is is unfortunate, that there was a real up, opportunity for all of us to come together and are calling this out, and I hope this is still there, but I think these people on the left gotta dropped the pretence and stop attending like these dudes, who are waving, Gadsden Flight other enemies. The gas in flags symbol of the Revolution of liberty and freedom. These people define the constitution might disagree, unlike the fundamental premise buying. Ahmed Armoury, but this was not the case people go mad at me over the thing and I look at the

What did you now with with George Floor Numb like no? This is a clear instance of wrong doing for the police. Everyone can just let biogas be bygones drop. The past deal with the problem at hand I guess we'll see, others plays out ice cube. You got your wish. People are strike and back and not it's not it's not, pretty you dont. You do not want to live in this man. I'll tell you what I was on West floors in Ferguson, they burn, that whole city to the whole site that whole street to the ground and as we drove down the street very slowly from the street. You could feel the heat from those buildings. It's it's you I mean if you ve, ever been near a big building fire. You know it. I've I've been at bonfires that they do this thing in Northern Ireland, big bonfires. You can feel that he from very very far away seeing these buildings Berne and, in the end, the energy just coming off. It's like shocking to people never experienced it. I think it's going. The worst this weekend. What I don't understand is theirs. There's no

playing the government could have done to actually have stopped this. They fired the cops immediately. The FBI's been called in. The mayor side with the protesters, yet they still riot and that's why I say it's not about justice, its opportunists stop defending them. Stick around next islands coming about one p m in the channel and I'll see. Well, then I hope we all are ready for some very spicy news. You see, they ve told us, oh and over again that mail in voting does not lead to fraud. That's just fake news, Donald Trump tweeting about it. Slap effect check on that tweet because it ain't true, while trumps tweet was an opinion and they linked to, the opinions of some CNN and wash and oppose journalists. Not facts now was a mistake. We know for a fact. This is true, but let me show you something I mean first most there are watching the video you can see the headline of the first story and I'm sure books too few saw the title of this video. But here we have an easy. Commissioner, quote no basis

four trump claims. Voting by male leads to vote or fraud. Here the real headline New Jersey, W c p leader calls for Patterson Mail in vote to be cancelled. Amid corruption claims to more candidates in putting one of the race winners join the call for a recount and a criminal investigation boy, oh boy, you imagine those really funny overnight. Does he Jack Dorsey tweeting about how we're I'm gonna keep applying r r o. You know labels to tweets that may be misleading and where our He'll goals is to show that people have conflicting views on this. Oh shut up. Bro, you know man, I mad respect, Jack or for setting a billion dollars to. You know you're, giving this money when you're doing school stuff. With that helping. Whatever. Whatever that the frozen familiar is given a bunch of stock away to help me no people, I'm not gonna, get that story, but you know that's cool school. I think checks all around a good did, but I think he just doesn't understand what is doing- and I was making every

thing worse. You want to know why I am actually triggered by what they're doing with trumps tweets because I live in New Jersey, three, thousand mail in ballots had signatures that didn't match the same person signature from the previous election. They disqualified them. Now you may So the right right off the bat that sound strange right. We are so had bundles of votes appearing in mailboxes in one town over from the other one and you're not allowed to bundle or bring in other people's votes on how these can upon together. The male carrier think saw this and was like Yahoo. This can't be rights, you you're, not log, do this is weird reported it now. The end w C p, a leader sang, shut it down not a left or right issue. Everyone agrees. While we can have this but think about the problem that comes with male in voting, you gotta, be I'm sorry, man, a special kind of tribal list.

You just ignore every thing happening around you, I don't know why, therefore mail in voting man. I gotta be honest because evidence of with two instances now where the Republicans cheated cannot all other applicants, but the people cheating we're doing it. For the Republicans I feel like I'm living in a big increase bills. Men, nothing seems to make sense, but it's not just about fraud. Ok, let's talk about ineptitude. Let's talk about these are like these. These votes that were bundle than shouldn't have been. Maybe it wasn't intentional Maybe someone just really dumb, then: do we really want to weaken our election? systems. Now we want to strengthen them in a forest male in voting has these problems. Maybe it's not the right thing to do it right so Jack Dorsey. If you could see the story, puts this fact. Label on Trump and I'm sitting you're going like dude. How dare you were?

I live in my state. We're deal with very serious corruption charges from the end of a p jack. What are you doing so I don't want the solutions, but I saw- I don't think you know, and I should say this in terms the lock down and how we should vote on another solution. I think these are getting better but change them Rules makes no sense and, more importantly, the beggar issue at hand right now wish it with my right arm and reduced stories. Is that the journalists claiming there's no mail and voter fraud are lying to you. Some fortunate that really is Jonathan danced and Joe Village valid what reporters for NBC Local New York have no problem telling us such as the truth. It's literally happening before our eyes. Why would Jack Dorsey Link from trumps tweet to the opinion of some analysts from CNN? It makes no sense. Say this. You wanna come to me and say: there's no melon voter fraud. Then let me ask you this question: what do you call it when

Twenty eight million mail in bed Let's go missing in the last four elections. You gotta be reunited. What were they would, what we were talking about: seven million ballots per election where these bout go. Oh you want to call it Do you mean to tell me that seven million people have decent had have been disenfranchised? Their vote has been a. Perhaps then we aid to secure our elections, much much better, let's see, what's goin on the Patterson, a Jersey, because this is the most important story. This the example. I want you to give people they say, there's no such thing as voter fraud. Bro send them ness and tell them when they say. There's no such thing as voter fraud, its trump be alike. Why would you ignore the pleas of the end w c? Are you a big it? I'm sorry, I gotta defer to the underprivileged underrepresented groups that are concerned. Their votes are being disqualified, mean this literally. If there is a margin, this group of not being like our chair winning is being suppressed because of corruption. You better believe

I want to be like yo fix this. Everyone agrees on this one and BC report. A Patterson and double lacy. P leaders at the recent city council vote by male election was alive ITALY, so flawed at the result should be thrown out and a new election ordered invalidate the election. Let's do it again said Reverend Kenneth Clayton amid reports more than twenty percent. Of all boats, were disqualified. Some in connection with voter fraud allegations these kinds of my people not want to vote anymore, they feel disenfranchise disconnected that their votes don't count, and that is not fair to people. He said now think about what you said about Trump they're saying in that fact, check from Twitter is Trop trying to suppress the vote. They say Republicans just don't want people to vote well Tell you what men rather reverent kind of Clayton says mail in voting. Corruption is making people not want to vote. What's the point of somebody,

yes, snap, your vote of a mail box and thrown a dumpster. What's the point these Rhett revelling are, Everett Clayton to the National Association for the advancement of colored people will soon be filing a written complaint to Governor fell Murphy, who ordered the vote by Male only election and state attorney General Gruber Royal Raw of all, men, are I respect this one hundred percent. I think the bigger problem is that We are changing the rules the last minute, and these problems are bound to happen and governance He is ignoring what's happening in Patterson. He was asked about this. The governor Josie is, is it is. I wasn't fell Murphy. He was asked about this at a press conference he said, will get what we'll get you your answer on this and then two days later is like we're going full statewide melon voting. These people are our are, are seriously concerned. I can't stand the statement. I you know what I live here. I'm leaving Patterson activists are his rockers has experiences. Election is an example of the kind of corruption that allegedly allegedly took place,

Rucker said he never received a ballot, but that election records show someone male than about in his name. I was robbed of the right to vote or not vote Rucker set. I was disenfranchised we're talking about the end of the late Z, be dude, it's not a left or right issue. In fact, you could argue that the left should be in favour of what you're asking for shut it down For some reason, it's the conservatives and the Democrats are in favour of the scrub system. New or I'm sorry. That was, but I regret to say, in favour of a system that could very well opened the door for exploitation, New Jersey, deputy assembly, Speaker, Benjy Wembley and his family, at a definition My vote and my wife are and two sons votes did not count in this pass municipal elections Wembley, sad he as a supporter of Governor Murphy, but given the history vote by male controversies. The governor I've done more to allow in person voting and to ensure safeguards were in place for those bout sent by mail that one in five bout eliminated, some due to alleged corruption.

Wembley said he was fed up with this. That's how you disenfranchise voters, that's the bottom line Let me read you that quote again and please I would like you to take this quote and share it with people. That's how you did Enfranchise voter. That's the bottom line tell me who is suppressing the securing the election guarantees, the people who vote can't get cheated and I'll throw it right back to voter id to. If you guarantee you need id to vote, you can prevent people from having their votes taken from them, whatever the point of the people walks, and they want to go out They got to that. You know that stand or whatever, and they say he hears my name John DOE undergo you voted already. What I didn't, yes, you did too bad, I'm not gonna, let you vote again and that person didn't however, why, because someone is when it voted in their name, so that's less in my opinion, a series of an issue, but the bigger issue is:

when you remove the people from the process mail in voting to get in the mail you coming through out later, I'm going to walk up and snatch you from your mailbox and that's what they're complaining I never got my vote who voted in my name. Somebody did three thousand votes disqualified. Twenty percent when released it, he was still waiting for an explanation from the board of elections. As to why is families? Votes were set aside? He said it. The issue is a signature matching signature magical on file, it's possible for second city. This can change over the years he said voting both should be open for elections, adding that if people can shop in supermarkets and liquor stores using check out machines, they can do it for elections to what it is. What's what does fight for the people. We need in person voting machines with social distancing and let me tell you something: maybe the signatures didn't match, because signature signature is slowly change that you know. I think so and that's another big boy, The problem is not that someone's gonna engage and voter fraud. It's that I can accuse.

As you will vote or fraud. So these electrically votes come in, and I see Community disenfranchise community at like I don't want them the wings. I know who they are voting for, let's invalidate their votes in where possible and argue it was fraud. The whole time see it's not. About necessarily actually commit fraud. Anyone could go in and be like all those votes over there as fraud and they're. Not you get it and then all of a sudden, there's big controversy, and then you gotta postpone it can like or have a reelection given at another election. I'm sorry just because someone pointed instead, here's why these Terrific. So now, there's due to saying my vote was set aside and legitimately voted therein lies the problem, yet still weak this over and over again, who are these people efficacy, commissioner? No basis for trot claims vote. By male leads to fraud. What's what did I just showed you that story? There's this guy? Not. Does this gonna

live here like does not live in America. Does he not have Google? I wonder here's, they say better. Election commission, commissioner Ellen Wind Rob on Wednesday night strongly back at claims for president trumpet mail in voting leave to high levels of fraud, asserting theirs. No basis for such allegations that the falsehoods may well undermine the american people's faith in our democracy. I call this evil. I do either banality of evil or over manipulation, because, while she's saying this literally while she sang this a leader in the end of July Sepia saying our votes are being taken from us. Please help. We now this election stopped and she's coming show, bring him in the back shut up, shut up, nothing's happening. There is no basis for this. There all liars, and you know what you get these journalists who, for whatever tribal as regions, want to come out and say: she's right, I don't

Ask me why the Democrats want, therefore, the media just bend over backwards to ensure they get what they want, but we have this explosive story from Roper politics. Twenty eight million mail in ballot missing the last four elections between two thousand and twelve and two thousand and eighteen. Twenty eight point: three mail in ballots remain unaccounted According to data from the federal Election Assistance Commission, the missing bow amounts to nearly one in five of all absentee balance and bouts mailed to voters residing in states that do elections possibly by mail. There is twenty percent of votes, disqualified, Patterson, New Jersey and double lazy pillars as YO. Stop this realer politics, as one in five bouts went missing in the past for elections strike you as odd. The very least we are problems. We can all agree on that right

there's got to be fixed. Yet, for some reason is news. Organisations are saying now, vote of Milton voter fraud doesn't exist. Why? It's not true! Why are they lying? Are they just stupid? Do they not have Google Yes, that's the case. States and local authorities simply have no idea what happened, whose bouts, since they were, never mailed and the figure of twenty Missing ballots is likely even higher, because some areas in the country, notably Chicago, did not respond to the federal agencies. Survey questions. This figure does not include Bautzen or spoiled undeliverable, or came back for any reason, although There is no evidence. The millions of missing bouts were used fraudulently. The public interest legal foundation, which compiled the public data provided from the electorate, the election assistance Commission

says that the sheer volume of them raises serious doubts about election security. These questions are particularly relevant as the covert nineteen pandemic is forcing states across the country to work with. You know what men there this weird thing I can actually read, because they have this video player blocking the let's ads for your some of his good for, and I can't read this the same election cycle. California legalised about harvesting and observers, say the practice played a key role in asking several Publican congressmen and Orange County in twenty two a long standing GEO Peace Stronghold in a state that has become very liberal in recent decades. Let's talk about what they're saying here wit, while when, as it pertains to missing ballots, maybe not fraud, we don't know about or missing, but also think about this with me:

and harvesting you end up with people who show up and say, hey I'll, bring in your ballot and and drop it off for you, that's about harvesting as and so the big fear and the concern with these missing boats is that lets say: there's an old folks, home right and you got thirty or forty people. And they just filled out their melon bouts. And then one of these guys is a republican, and he knows who the Democrats are. He knows because they argue all the time right and so the knees I a you know, if you guys want I'll, bring em all down the mailbox for ya, then they go thanks, George and they take them. On Ngos, Biden, Biden, Biden, you know a tramp tramp tramp. He throws the bad ones in the trash throws. The trump in the mail and there you go missing ballots. No one knows what happened to him. That's one of the biggest fierce with harvesting. But when you look at something like Patterson, you wonder how these votes got bundle in the first place. Let's just make it simple. Somebody could go

who, in area they know, is overwhelmingly democratic and pull the ballots before their even filled out and throw me the shredder, you good, it's it's it's just that and then you never get to vote and then they simply say you didn't vote, that's disenfranchisement, but of course there's the other problem of once you have melon ballots. These stories of pop up then they will just use them as fuel to disqualify, whoever they want. The fact that millions of unused melon doubts are floating around Every election cycle is not a secret type data here, it sitting there on the internet and you're paying for the server cost notes. Logan church well a spy spend four p. I laugh. So what do people that really focus in the election process do about that they go into ballot, harvesting, if they're so many boats out there in the wind on accounted for by election officials, sure play? Some manpower could be dedicated to go, bring them in, and That's another part of the system where you have a weakness, witnesses and risks to illustrate risk. Churchill notes

that in twenty. Sixteen Hillary Clinton one the popular vote by garnering over two point: eight million, more votes and Donald Trump, but nearly six million on accounted melon belts were never counted, and twenty sixteen more than twice is her margin in the popular vote. The potential to affect elections by chasing down unused, met, Melba Melon belts and make sure they accounted using methods that may or may not be illegal is great, not even that There is one when it where there's a six million unaccounted for melon bouts. You mean to tell me that Hillary Clinton may have lost because someone torched or mail in ballots that simple men. So why are the Democrats advocating for this new idea also possible that six million unaccounted melon bouts were for Trump and they thought they were going away. Because that was enough- and I did not expect trumpet get a margin that he did. I don't know the point is Hilary lost and they say six million vote melon boats, a melon belts were on accounted for. I think it's fair to point out that may have helped Hilary win its who it's hard to say hello

There is little doubt as the number of male in boats increases so does fraud, but twenty twelve report in the New York Times noted that vote Fraud involving melon bout is vastly more prevalent than the in person your father has attracted far more attention a legitimate and administrators say in Florida Wasn t bout scandal seem to arrive like clockwork around election time according to a Wall Street Journal report and voter exploitation in hispanic communities in Texas, mail in boats, quote: spawned a mini industry of consultants who get out the absentee vote, sometimes using questionable techniques, poor, elderly and minority communities are all are most likely to be preyed upon by so called ballot brokers, marginalize communities being targeted preyed upon it. The Democrats are insistent that we expand this. You want these people to be victim. I guess so concerned about fraud in melon bouts.

We're serious enough that into doesn't eight that that it wasn't a report produced by the Caltech MIT Voting Technology project recommended that states restrict or abolish on demand, absentee voting in favour of in person early voting. Why is Jack Dorsey? Putting a fact check on something so blatantly one sided. Why is he argued in favour of something that is just plainly? False Chris Solygia of CNN and the washing post? Analysts are not fact checking anything, and this is what we get. This is the danger of twitters involvement. So now we have big breaking news. You're probably heard Donald Trump is gonna, be signing an elected, an executive order which that's going to target section two thirty, the full details yet, but the rap was just really so stick around cuz at four p dot m I'm going to be going over this and what it means in the reactions what you got. Their stand. Where this comes from this really could you know all of this could really just be one big side, because yesterday I did talk about this being all real. Well now I think them

support take away from this- and I I would ask you this the store that needs to be shared Josie and double icy pilot and double icy, peel and double a c p leader, wants Patterson Melon vote to be cancelled amid corruption claims. This is a story that needs to be shared. We can talk about social media censorship and excitement, but they're really tied together, but the reality is twitter is interfering. The election. The people. Most negatively impacted by this are marginalized communities. So why the Democrats in favour of of hurting them even more? Your guess, is as good as mine. And I will actually I'm sure a lot of people are very strong pings about why they're doing it, corruption being one of them. Let me think about it. If this guy is saying, this is corrupted needs to be stopped and the damage as I know, no doubt stop. It sounds like they're saying we should have more of the system which leads to corruption. Its import simple, like elegant way, there's two people one. The person telling you to put a lock on your front door and the other.

The other guy saying. No, no, don't lock your front door you'd be like. Why don't you want me to lock my front door? What why you telling me not to put a lock on my door? That seems weird Who do you think is more likely to want to burglarize your house, the present tongue, you to secure your house or the person telling you to not secure your house should be obvious right the end of p, are saying: we need security so that we don't disenfranchise our people and the Democrats. Are saying: no, no, don't don't don't don't secure the election. I guess I'll see how things play out to stick around go Timcast net, it's my main channel, all the segment on trumps executive order coming up at four p m for those living in the pot gas. You ve already heard the segments to stick around a lot more to come and I will see you all in the next segment.

Following up on my main channel segment about Donald Trump looming executive order, it would seem that Twitter, Jack Dorsey are. Dare I say panicking over what's about two com, if you haven't seen the segment had over two TIM gas dot net, it's been live as a four p m, but I'll give you quit contact if you missed, it basically Trump is set to sign an executive order by the time you're watching this, maybe They did it basically asking f c c, to clarify the rules around section, two: thirty meaning long story short twitter could lose their section two thirty protections. If they deemed to be a public service. A platform is kind of murky territory, but the general ideas at Trump is trying to combat censorship. Twitter fact checks to month old, tweets by China as Trump buttons web giants with bias investigations following outcry over accuracy, warning on president trumps tweets. The reason

I believe Jack Dorsey and many other platforms are probably freaking out right now is because, while for one, this is can you take me to border button Jack Dorsey's physician specifically, he fact check Donald Trump's opinion. This is a huge, huge mistake, like I'm talking, wow level mistake if you're going to argue that you're a platform, not a publisher. The last thing you want to do is alter the content produced by people who are just a pint. And your platform, but Jack Dorsey his coat. I should say Twitter, colonel those him directly, but he's gonna take responsibility for altered, Donald Trump tweet to send you to the opinions of people, don't like trap that is complete at a tory allies, and while this is it, the perfect answer, but it seems like to avoid any question of political bias. There now fact checking tweets by China. This also following out almost outcry about us,

It meant by Mark Zuckerberg, basically dragging twitter. Ah, what you call a twin, you ever emotional satisfaction, catharsis, I suppose schadenfreude whatever three. What happened twitter is fact, checks to tweets by China after it caused a political storm in the? U S, by flagging to avail trumps tweets for accuracy, sparking fury from the president and accusations of bias zones, media giant at an exclamation point warnings to tweets by China's Foreign Ministry spokesmen, choosing the: U S of starting a crowd of ours pandemic. The timing of the fact checks coincide with political fall out in America from twitters decision to add accuracy, warnings on two of president trumps tweets claiming male election bouts were substantially fraudulent, the decision to single out two of the president's tweets. For fact, checking led to furious accusations of anti conservative bias in the. U S. Trump is now threatening to sign an executive order today, which could expose Google face

work and twitter to government investigations into allegations of bias and more lawsuits, but amid the route twit some are singled out tweets by China's Foreign Ministry Spokesmen Legion, lesion, Zhao, accusing me of armour army of starting a crowd of irish pandemic. He said it, it might be the US army, blood a blot? Ok, you know why twitters doing this they're, like one out by see, look no we're not it's not just trumpets its China to Donald Trump and its executive order, specifically called out China. Okay. This is this. Is it The draft of the executive order got leaked, I'm sure that but I saw it and they immediately were like quick sensor, China. What do we do? Maybe they got heads up on this first, because there are some reports coming out. I don't know what it when exactly leaked, but they're trying to make it seem like they're, not biased, but you go in fact check every politician for every false claim. How much fact check Joe Biden, who lived with the very fine people hopes, but before we will

I want the story. I've gotta give a quick shouted to today's sponsor virtual shield. Virtual shield is a virtual private network service, its basically a program you can download that provides your internet browsing with a basic layer of security. They are hackers. There are government agencies, their general, the fairies, there's one a break and your system steal your data and a VP and is one simple way to protect yourself now it must help people, you look at you. You have lost your doors and windows, but you don't expect people to break and we still do it and to be honest, if somebody really wanted to, they could break the deadlock on your door, but you still have that lock right, because it makes sense to have basic security right now. If you go to hide with TIM dot com, you can get fifty percent off your virtual private network service, it just two thousand fifty cents per month. I'm eternally grateful to virtual chauffeur sponsoring my channel their there one of the few spot of actually haven't. I think it's a great service, so if you want to take you and us

carry security seriously, check out hide with TIM dot com. The link will be in the description below, but let's get back to the main story. They love running this fake story where they claim that tromp sad, some pretty nasty people were very fine people, but they remove the context where tromp sad. I condemn the white supremacist totally. He said they should be condemned totally and was talking about someone else. They remove that they edited twitter. Does nothing so yeah is biased and now they're worried. What do they do is work. It's funny when asked about president trumps expect. Executive order on social media platforms. Nancy policy did not hold back her criticism of the companies All they want is to not pay taxes, yes, Nancy Hello. Basically, they say she slammed the companies for pandering to Donald Trump. When giving in what he wants, because in the wake of this penning executive order they may actually have to, I don't know, do their jobs and beheld to a certain standard, now this move from all I want. I want elaborate mark. Zuckerberg said I did briefly talk

oxide organ the main segment, but I want to really dive into him specifically because he's trying to play it up. Like you, ve said we have a different policy than I think twitter on this he wants to make. It seem like we're, not we're not going to fact check and we're going to be hands off. Let me tell you a funny story: Prager University may be familiar with published a screenshot of a tweet. It made several claims about immigration. It was fact checked by Facebook. So when I saw it appeared my feed or I think I went to their site, I could see that it said we know this has been fact checked by Facebook and you have to click a warning. Before reading the tweet, it was like us a screenshot that they linked to an article which backed up every thing Prager you had claimed one hundred percent

I won't wait a minute, so here's what I did. I took the same shot the same screenshot. I made a new image this time in my post. I linked directly to the fact that article and said something like this article backs up everything in this image and they flagged my content as false, too yeah mark you're, you're, you're, you're, you're, lying okay, they're, all lying there, all sure you know what maybe maybe plus is right. They just want to pay taxes, that's what it's all about! Huh, they're all iris. All they want to do is sell ads. They dont want to deal at the controversy I hate to a certain degree. I can respect that, but you know what you know. This is the territory that you have answered and if you want to play games you reap what you have sown so mark. No, I don't buy it. You sensor people, right all the time you banned on Instagram apologies of Watson, and he had this. Just like him, smoking cigarettes and the sunset look. If you're mad Pugs Watson's, got opinions and is on facing you know like em, I get it back.

I back the dude from Instagram when it was literally photos of him, like you know like making a facing us They are in his mouth. Is academia selfie shots? I you know a man I want to play games am I going to say, here and take these lies from you over we're better than twitter. We wouldn't do that you're, not you just bad. It's just that. You know getting called out because you can go for the President regret for the smaller channels. Political reports- Facebook Ce Mark, Zuckerberg argued Wednesday that private companies should not be the arbiter of truth online implicitly, implicitly rebuking fellow tech tighten Jack Dorsey. Ever the twitter CEO flagged a pair of President Donald Trump spouse with fact check warnings that provoked the White Ass, his iron. We have a different policy, then I think twitter on this one Zuckerberg told Fox NEWS House. Dana per annum,

in an interview set to air Thursday. You know I just believe strongly that Facebook shouldn't be the arbiter of truth of everything that people say online. I think in general, private companies shouldn't probably shouldn't be, or especially these platform accompanies shouldn't, be in a position of doing that. I love it. I love it. So here's the problem, a new story broke from the Wall Street Journal. Facebook knows that there are great them, was radicalizing people What are they do? Nothing? They stopped it under the rug there now trying to pass it off like well, we shouldn't be the arbiter of truth. No, you, your algorithm is exploiting people and making people go insane. There's a big difference between algorithmic promotion and censorship. A lot of people complain about. Do they say you know I posted a video, and then you too, you know like wont, work recommended- or whenever I have always maintained this in most. My videos, I mention all say, share the video because you to prop up

This is my channel down in props up the mainstream media, I'm not making a dig at you D for doing it, Thank you too, but under any obligation to promote my content. So long as it's visible, I did complain, recently, because you tube shadow band. What am I videos? Hey? If I make a video its legal speech, it's important. You should allow people to see if they choose to you. Dont have to promote it so I get it, it might hurt me and my income, but as long as the videos available for people to seek out and find I'm cool with that Facebook has an algorithm and the algorithm chooses what you see how about this facebook? How about? If you want claim not be the operative truth. You remove the algorithm, and it just read it just chronological order to veto. So when someone posted pops up done end of story, no facebook wants to maximize the amount of time spent on site, so they can maximize, add sales. I get it, I get it. What that means, though, is they want to make the content there? Feeding? You is more likely to get attention from you, so they made an algorithm to do that then spread

fake news, and then one people complain and say: dude. Look all the fake news in your platform there like well we're not the arbiters of truth. I mean the first thing they do. Is they bend over backwards from the left? censoring all this content go way out. Rachel censoring legitimate news from conservative outlets and then they have and show you say: oh well, you know what we're not arbiters of truth. Not spare me dude, it's it's! It's a lie its again, these its way to solve face which problem gay, no more fact checking period, get rid of all of it, and then, when someone posts, it appears it's that simple, because that if someone spreads fake news, so what people spread fake news to each other all the time I went to Walgreens like a couple weeks ago and the lady was talking nonsense about bill gates and stuff, and I'm like that. I don't think that's true. No, I mean it was real crazy. Starfleet. I understand is not a weird things about bill gates. People been sharing, but I mean like just off the rails. Like you know, these are my. I'm, I'm not going to say I'm not gonna, get into it. Let me just tell you it was this

terribly absurd, like ask conspiracies unlike govern withholding stuff, and unlike ok, Facebook is me talking to my friends and family. I mean I actually, Otto really use Facebook to be honest, but if I've sold makes it oh and their alike, in oh uncle, on uncle bill telling is, is thoughts on on unhampered whenever you it happens all the time uncle bills always got opinions. Now they just talk more. The problem arises with us with the algorithm selecting certain content for maximum viewer ship, because then what gets propped up is the most. Insane conspiracy, nonsense, videos, photos and articles it's an exploited by websites, and that's the big problem you want to deal with this I'll, tell you what twitter should not be playing this game at all. Facebook should not and Youtube shouldn't either, but you two very different from the rest of us. Ok, now with Youtube we're getting dangerous territory, we really are, because you know you tube is getting really close to being like an employer

and being liable for the things people publish I'm get into that, but I will tell you if you're interested in that take, I do talk a bit more over at TIM cast dot net in my four p m segment. However, a rapid up there, the long the gist of this is that you know the social media companies are freaking out and trying to ponder desperately mark Zuckerberg. Pandering to tromp is like no. No. We we wouldn't do that inject orgies like butter, but I'll, open China too weak now you're worried, because Trump as waved the sword with cigarettes. A couple more segments coming up for you in a few minutes, and I will see while shortly right now As I understand it, writing and looting is currently going on in Minneapolis for now, I think like the second or third night, depending on where you say it started. I think it's like the third night over the the killing of George Floyd's, a very horrifying story. But I want to go over this store. I hear Eluder was shot dead by pawnshop owner during Georgia, George Floyd Riots and there's a lie. Really hot opinions about whether or not this guy was justified. But I more

am I really want to talk about this Cassandra, fair banks many of you may know our she's been tween up a storm and now they're all trying to cancel her and you can't? I'm going to see a good example of what happens when people try to get you get. You fired from a job, but you don't work for you work for yourself and you ve got your own company everything. It's really really funny. It's kind of what Rogan was saying in the interview with very wise, where he was like we're entering a new era where people just will work for themselves. They can't get cancelled circus. You can say whatever she wants and you can't get fired and income is safe. Same is true. For the most part for me and other people there's no boss, for you call brow words secure. We set our own companies and now we become immune to your cancer culture nonsense, but first and foremost What are our lightly over the story? They say a suspected Luther was reportedly gun down by a pawn shop owner amid riots over a white police officer is we know, I mean

you know what I'll be honest. That's basically the story and Cassandra Fair banks treated this Ella Mayo looting, a pawn shop to F Ace. All business owner isn't fighting for your future Its rightfully ensuring you dont have a future. As you can see, from that video and she was responding to this tweet show you the collective outrage which ultimately goes nowhere this wheat says so so, ok, there's a lot, the go through here. Business fun is fond. Bear with me, Tommy Lorraine said how does looting, riding and destroying your own community bring justice for anyone. Tommy, that's a great question: it's a real question. It doesn't this guy says: if this is your first and only reaction to the death of yet another unarmed black men at the hands, the police. You are part of the problem after Moran. Anyone who shares a mentality- well, ok, body, The first thing I said when I saw that video was it was an unjust killing. We need more, we did we. More video, but it looks really really bad. Then I put

Videos were I'm like here's, the proof the dude wasn't resisting so I'm sorry brow. My first reaction, wasn that why are you looting? My first reaction was the cops killed, a guy. How about that? And now I want to know why you think targeting innocent people attacking them. Destroying their businesses is anyway, bringing justice twenty one. Let's make one thing clear: targeting an auto zone and low income housing in no way helps fight for justice marriage. My question here you made it and what you want they fired. The cops are at the FBI's, forgetting? The mayor is on your side, so no spare me your lies when you wanna go steal a television we all want. Justice for George Floyd, you want to throw brick through the window for no reason other than an out you're a bad person, while this part It responds Cassandra. Rules is much worse than Tommy she's out here applauding looks getting shot for fighting for their future. So this one set breaking,

suspected looter, reportedly shot dead by pawnshop owner during item minneapolis- this comes after hours of ongoing mass writing. Cassandra posted the lapping, Margie. I'll tell you I'm in. I strongly strongly oppose the death penalty? Very much so, I understand. However, there sir instances in which you gonna lose your life man you gonna lose your life, if you, if you, if you cross the line, I am sad to hear, I really am at the sky. Was lewdness. Stop this the store lost his life style. I know a lot of people are probably saying he deserved it, and now you reap what you sow not stuff, I don't like people dying, then I really really don't and You know that it's a very, very hard line for me for what even constitutes death and now here's the kicker look. Here's the real point do was breakin into someone store. You eat. You ve put your off in a position where some one else might lose their life they're gonna defend themselves. So this

This is a point I have to make when it comes to my stance on the death penalty. If you ve subdued someone there are no longer a threat. I do not believe you can and their life. I really really don't. So when it comes to George Floyd what we saw a man lying on the ground, not resisting saying please, please, please, I can't breathe and where they do nothing, that's the difference. This dude said Almah break into this guy's building and take his stuff a guy in there doesn't know of this. Dude gonna hurt him or not, because people are thrown wondering to change, saw dude. You see that video, the guy the changes and though he said I'm going to find myself and you know what I know how you can complain about that. If you break onto someone's property, they got a right to defend themselves. So here's, where gets funny alike. Thus this person said I gotta pull us up what what what what the freak twitter quote. Tweed Cassandra she said. Judging by what has been allowed to take place in Minneapolis, maybe we need more oppression, I'm pretty sure Cassandras Half Chuck

So I know Cassandra, I'm pretty sure, she's half joking about this right, like obviously there's a funny. Point to be made when you like go over the top and exaggerate, but also a fair point. We made that we need more security to stop this. Some capacity or whatever I don't love. I would agree with, like whatever whatever. If the point was like me, policing or more secure. Do not agree with that, but I honestly think she's just try the troll and get a rise out of people for the most part, but there's gonna be a rational discussion about how much policing would be necessary. You wouldn't say this Cassandra, certainly smart after the vote. Information about security, she's very clearly, trolling, these people risk. Says get her fired and she responded. You aunt Ella. Well, that's it. I feel so good Karen culture, failing but gotta understand about cancel culture getting fired. You they're saying I want to speak to your manager. I you you should fire this person Because they are being need to mean I'm, the customer get her fired because under says

that's why this is so fun? I've been cancelled like five times so I have prepared. I have my multiple sources of income and their rights. Each mob proof. Bravo, Cassandra. Bravo I certainly am not one to get bombastic on twitter in this way, but there is a certain catharsis in cancel culture failing and failing miserably. I love it when they post pictures of me in there like PA, look at TIM Pool sitting with these objectionable people and micro who you complaining to you, think I care. I'm a my boss. I run my company. Multiple companies, actually ain't, nothing. You can do about it, playing all you want post wherever you want, do you think, really trying to get hired by Buzzfeed or the New York Times MA. Am I'm gonna go? companies, and I said They got more than enough opportunity, Even outside of this have to worry about your stupid. Cancel culture, you have you have

on this to yourselves the leading the drug that induces the fear the virus of council culture is failing. We are building a society aim and an immunity to this and good with Donald Trump Sex. Or maybe even get better at first many people were for various companies. They realise that people were scared to lose their jobs, so they went hand they went at people lost their jobs, a lot of us people than made new jobs, notably Jack Murphy, you. Maybe no you jack. I shouted a model on a couple of hours ago, because your talk about masculinity, but he had anti for come after him. Posting pictures line do loses his job. So what do you do? Writes a book starts a new career, and now he's is assuming he's better off he's do eat. He turned, That is like it's like a martial arts move like when they come at you like judo, and you turn their energy against them, and if you guys what cobwebby about there's an episode where the guy runs, adamantly Gratis, Rison flips and with a little bit

energy in a redirection that energy becomes a weapon against the person. So you see people like Jack, you get cancelled and they redirect that energy in their food so you can try and banners. You can try and cancel Aussi area adds its it. I'm sorry, man, you ve, lost their power, but that won't stop. Certain organizations from trying outside of the activists this the best Jared halt. Ah Jared reporting for right wing Watch, dare I say, german old act Billy did a really good job reporting on the ground. When I was in, I think it was Portland. And I wondered why it is that he write such trash while he works for a democratic, fundraising, organization. Basically, it's a right wing. What is. It is eight as an arm of the project for the american way to progressive advocacy group in order to make money it appears to at their strategy is to write. Sensation was shot content about the right and monetize it by asking for donations Jared, that's what he does he's not

I mean you could argue that he is reporting, think it's fair he's fairies advocating he's advocating for you to common fund them for their causes. Usually tweeted Cassandra, fair banks are order for the gateway pundit and an influential Magua world personality took too I've dream on Twitter over the weekend to read passages from the Euro bombers manifesto and take aim at leftist and anti racist activists and how's. This news dude: why should anyone care? Because you live in that easy crazy world. Now, I'm sorry dude, I I dont care. Literally don't care. It's not news. These activists are bored, their anger. They're burning things there writing for no reason just because they want to because it feels good, though not getting justice for anybody. Let us guy

Cassandra made a comment about Somalians blowing up their own buildings and in Minneapolis they're burning down their own buildings. Any says somebody find this how she in Dc Finder. What does that mean? We try to do? No, that's where it goes home. You can't counselor and I gotta find her hour. I did I get it their desperate cancel, cultures and working so much isn't anymore. Is it and this is what happens now? They're gonna panic? Oh no, oh! No! I! cause. This person harm will escalate it. It's too bad. I'm looking forward future, though I'm excited about what comes from. Is it from the executive order, because I think it'll be positive Trump executive order. I don't know for sure, but also be the first point out man. He could negatively impact. My business and being on you to pick a herd, everybody, but you know what I'm just sick of this I'm sick of all of it. I'm sick of these people will see how things play. I guess, but our anyway I wrap it up with this. You can't cancel us anymore. You can't cancel the uncontrollable

and Cassandra, loving it and she's gettin his edges. She can there's nothing. You can do about it too bad for poor babies. You lose your power should have had the first I got one more segment coming up for you in a few minutes and I will see while shortly We have a major breaking update on the culture war front seat. He transgender athlete policy violates title nine. According to the Education Department, the? U S. Education department found that Connecticut policy to allow transgender athletes to competing girl. Sports violates title nine. This is huge humanity the story, but there's a lawsuit from several young females who are they run track and they have to compete against males the males identify as female, but as the story goes at least, you know up until the private putting these males weren't undergoing any kind of medical transition and any capacity they're, just males who say they identify as female. Well

according to the Department of Education, that is a violation of their civil rights, and we now I have a response from the from the likes organization, sports governing body, Connecticut, saying there defending the policy on others. Since they could lose federal funding over this. They now we have a federal guy. Since this may aid these young females in their loss illustrate the story. Patch reports a Connecticut policy that allows transgender athletes to compete in girls sports. Now I gotta stop there, because it not being clear Enough Connecticut policy that allows trench transitory athletes to compete at mining is any division that means. If someone is born female, they could choose to compete in male athletics. The issues they don't because, typically they can't many women are biologically different However, in some circumstances, like with the issue of MAC Bags, whose biologically female but is transit, in hormones to mail. This person does compete against,

males in wrestling. So I'll read more the ruling which was obtained Thursday by the Associated Press comes, sponsor a complaint filed last year by several female track athletes who argue that too, transgender runner sword and identified as male at birth and unfair physical advantage? The office setting a forty five page letter that it makes big to withhold federal funding over the policy which allows a transgender athletes to participate as the gender with which they identify. If the policy is a violation of title nine federal civil rights law that guarantees equal. Education opportunities for women, including in athletics, it has quote, did night female student athletes, athletic benefits and opportunities, including advice. And saying to the finals at events higher level petitions awards, metals, recognition and the possibility of greater visibility to colleges and other benefits. The Connecticut interests I think I've got a conference which overs, he's glass exports in the state has set its power, she is designed to comply with the states law boring sir,

all from discriminating against transgender students, a call seeking com, it was left Thursday with sea. I see as a spicy check it out. The schools are like. The state is mandating. We do this, otherwise the violation of civil rights law and other fats our government saying well Yaller violating civil rights law, so you could have to pick. One c like the schools, are between a rock and a hard place. Ultimately, though, federal law will supersede the state, but let's read some more on the story: a Turk as for the alliance defending freedom who represent the girls who brought the complaint, said they would have a comment later on Thursday, the as for civil rights ruling names, the CIA C and school districts, the transgender runners in those falling the complaint competed glad very. Further, whenever ok, so that very go the office that it will cost. Either initiate administrative proceedings to suspend, terminate or refuse to grant or continue and defer financial assistance to the C. I a sea and those districts or further.

Access to the. U S. Department of Justice well begins by sea on us in its letter, The office for civil rights said it noted. By the CIA Sea and the school districts of its pending decision in February, but that sub the current negotiations failed, the result in an agreement over the policy, the dispute? which is already the subject of a federal lawsuit centres on two transgender sprinters. Terry or an Andrea year, one who have frequently outperform their competitors winning a combined fifteen girls, state, indoor or outdoor championship races in TWAIN. Seventeen accorded lawsuit lawyers They transgender athletes have argued that boy, both are undergoing hormone treatments that have put them on an equal footing with the girls. They are competing against full stop, not true. Now it may it sure they're on hormone there, The UK is the last story, though I am a cover story. They weren't below just tell you some men, pre Natal, test, strong plays a role in the development of fast twitch and slow twitch muscles, I'm not a biologist, but this

generally understood thing in sports. That means when you are developing in the womb the amount of test up through the preyed on testosterone, Yorks, Those two changes. Your bodies, development, regardless whether or not you are changing late, IRAN after puberty. More importantly, you have to point out that, even if they're on hormone therapy, they ve been fitted from their entire lives of male puberty, so they have advantages, I'll give you a real world example. So you can understand this ring. Leaned skateboarding brought this up, because I loved skateboarding in this part of you know my my culture. An eleven year old boy sat me history recently by performing a ten Eighty degrees spin on a standard sized half pipe. It was, I believe, nineteen. Ninety nine, when Tony HAWK the we most famous the most famous skateboard on the world, landed a nine hundred degrees turn. It was great the breaking when he did and its

I can merely it what's taken twenty years for that to be broken, now by and eleven year old boy who added on another rotation to ten eighty. We don't see this among little girls I mean this with no disrespect, I mean, as with all due respect, the skill level of female skaters, is definitely going up and we're seeing some truly impressive moves from young women, but recently videos. We ve, seen from from younger girls, are on the same age are getting closer. Do Limited spends and nowhere near as good as setting historical records in the sport. The first Kennedy ever perform. Was on a mega ramp, so people dont viewed as the saying is done by a believe. A ten year old boy, I think, was Mickey Bruce call not entirely sure we're just not seeing the same level of competitiveness, competitiveness even before puberty. And I mean this with all due respect in no do. I think anyone should be discriminating against any one in there lies the problem:

not saying that these thou biological males should be removed, because it's you know it's. In favour of discrimination. No, I think we need to avoid discrimination. There are females who are being deprived of opportunities as a serious issue. That's the way their viewing title night it would seem is that there are great benefits given people who perform really really well enough Lennox in colleges. Women should be, granted the same opportunities as men, males and females, when we recognise that's males in He may have different bodies, then you have to place them in separate divisions because they perform differently because the because of the news it, laws that are passing their pudding, males, and the female division, thus taking away the opportunities of females. I'm not talking about your you mean about what man is or woman as I'm talking about male and female, and that's just it isn't matter, identify as matters what you buy a lot. Because we are and how that changes things you can do. Yet there are some males that do better or worse than females, not the point make a new division

We then need a transgender athlete division, and maybe that will for these individuals, new opportunities and more opportunities, and therein lies the bigger solution. You can't take away someone else's opportunities. You discriminate against them a little bit more. Is it the plaintiffs sought to block the participation of Miller in year? What ball seniors from spring track meets, which were later, can so because of the covered nineteen pandemic, they were also seeking to erase all records set by the transgender athletes. You know, I think these This way, to put it is transit, their female is not the same as biological female. We know that that's true ask any the USA, biological female. You get it. Ok, transgender female! You get it. Ok, maybe those need to be separated and we did the same thing for transgender males, or whenever or Harvey already described it. Maybe we need for divisions,

maybe you have transgender females and transgender males compete against each other, because that kind of even the playing field for both of them, but it doesn't it if it's not fair to one, Class one identity group to take away things they fought for to try and help a different identity group. It just doesn't make sense. It is one of eighteen states, along with Washington DC that allow transit or high school athletes to compete without restrictions according to Trans athlete, not come, which track state power she's in high school sports across the country several our states of policies, barring the participation of transgender athletes, I dont recently became the first state to pass a law banning transgender women from competing and women sports, I can civil liberties, union and legal voice, Father federal lawsuit, contending that love violates the. U S constitution, because it is discriminatory and an invasion of privacy. Now there are some. Arguments there and the invasion of privacy argument, but

discriminatory especially basin. The nineteen sixty four civil Rights ACT, which states you can't discriminate on the basis of sex. If we are talking It says the basis of sex. Ok, we're on top, but identity you want and identity, we do have a conversation. It says on the basis of sex. That means these rights or biologically mail by place it by creating a debate. And where any mail can enter any division. You are now taking away the opportunities of females. Therefore, or violating the nineteen sixty four civil rights ACT. Of course, the response once from the sports governing body is in defence. How can a their response, because it's really just a waste of words, but they say following the ruling, the the governing body of states. Classic athletes is issued. A response defending its long standing statute is gonna get interesting, but I think Connecticut is gonna, lose this one, and I think this may be a dramatic change.

To how these rules are being enacted. Dare I say those who advocated for biological mail to compete against pouch of emails? I think they're going to lose this one, I think they already have Connecticut is just the first out of. All the lawsuit will likely move forward now, with a lot of support. The federal government, the state may have no choice. Now, it's possible gonna understate loss as note this is the law you loose and if they appeal and they keep taking up to the Supreme Court then we get a nation wide ruling on this, and I think it's going to favour these young females and not the trend under athletes. I may not have this in any disrespect are added to our communities, I'm only seeking to minimize the discrimination, that's my opinion, in which case were empty,

get up I'll leave their stick around next augments coming up tomorrow at ten, a m on this channel and I'll see you all them.