Annie had an Eric, honest today of all days, so mom brought her to minute, clinic Fc Vs, where you can see a provider Philip prescription and grab essentials like pain, relief products. in one visit even on evenings and weakens you? Can you CS online, with pale health options for quality, affordable care on your schedule, visit minute clinic at sea vs. That's how healthier happens together. Services very allocation prescriptions can be attained. Pharmacy of choice visit many conduct. Our comfort details today, is January, fourteenth, twenty twenty two and our first story, the? U S says it has intelligence that Russia will stage a false flag attack to justify an invasion of Ukraine. What is this just a distraction from the bad administration over failing approval ratings and there is much domestic policy plans interact story, Joe Rogan ones, then being slammed by the media, but this time it turns out he's actually right. I do get one point wrong in this.

believe Joe Rogan arguing about my card and vaccines may have been correct and in our lab story, harmonization of, we're civilization could be resulting in its collapse. I give you an assessment of data from the New York Times talking about how women favour more communal approaches and banning hate speech where men take the opposite position? Now, if you like this, show, please leave of Goodwill you and give us five stars and, if you're really like it share it with your friends now, let's get into that first story today, we have received a shocking new revelation, the U S intelligent. information that Russia will stage a false flag attack on its own soldiers to justify an invasion of Ukraine. And I have only one question: why do I care about Ukraine? What do I care about these foreign conflict? You ve not explained that to me by an administration nominal point, something else out too well

certainly think this is newsworthy and we are going to go in depth on what's going on in Ukraine. I wonder why it is that just The other day, Joe Biden lost a major court ruling with the Supreme Court striking down. Here vaccines, mandate. Joe Biden then comes out and says the states in the and businesses to just have vaccine mandates anyway, and now all of a sudden we're getting speculation from U S intelligence. that's a mention its also on a Friday to so. I can't I don't know to say, but I can tell you a few things: the abruptness by which information has landed in our lab suggests. To me, it's possible the bad administration, trying to shift the narrative off of Joe Biden? Failing approval, writing and is major defeat, the Supreme Court, but that being said, it's also possum there actually is intelligence? Russia is planning to invade Ukraine well invade Ukraine more than they already have, and releasing this on a Friday, because it would make them look even worse.

But I'm really see what the point is in releasing intelligence that indicates, Russia is preparing an operation when they have actually done anything yet other than to distract the american public. I suppose now I want to be fair to be reasonable. Look Russia does want to invade Ukraine. Russia is building up forces on their their west, fraud and Ukraine's eastern front entirely possible. We do see major conflict in the region. I don't want to get trapped in I didn't derangement syndrome where everything is just based upon how bad Joe Biden looks. The reality is, I think there is coming conflict, but also what a poor now the news industry controls what we think about and what we think is important right now we have major information on what China is doing and the escalation of the conflict between Taiwan and China and the United States and I think it's fair to say that the conflict with China is much more pro,

and much more relevant to Americans, considering our manufacturing base being shipped overseas, namely to China, as well as the fact that we are directly interacting with the chinese Navy or on the people's Republic of China, where the call it meanwhile with Ukraine Proxy war. When I look at Ukraine, mine, immediate assessment, is that Joe Biden, powerful, NEO, liberal and neo. Con elites were run in a griffin. They were run. It scam. Another stand to lose tons of money from their ridiculous plan related to natural gas. That's what I see when I see China and the Pacific and Taiwan. I see a real threat to technology production Silicon ships, the? U S, Navy our position in the Pacific Alaska in Hawaii, and I wonder why it is that is not the topic of conversation. Well, my friends

you think we still need to talk about what's going on in Ukraine, because it can have serious effects on what's going to happen here. In United States and also to point out one thing, the individual who wrote this article four CNN, which I'm using it someone who pushed. The Russia Gate narrative to an absurd degree. So take it all. With a grain of salt men, people on the right are pointing out that its very convenient the threat war looms at a time when Joe Biden is being slammed over failing approval. Could it be like having biting at thirty three percent and real, clear politics having bite at forty one percent approval war tends to benefit President's when they are struggling with domestic issues, but I dont think Joe Biden conspired to put russian troops near the eastern border of Ukraine So if anything, it would seem that there is a real problem here, that we need to talk about, and maybe

bite in an administration are trying to explain the crisis to distract american public. But that being said, let's read the news before we get started, had over two TIM cast dot com and become a member top support. My work and the work of our journalists. As a member, you are directly funding the journalists. At TIM, casta common, hard work, they do and you will get access to exclusive members of the tin cast iron podcast. Ton of really awesome people in our library. We ve got Steve Bannon and Alex Jones Marjorie Taylor Green MIKE row recently, so you'll definitely want to check out that huge library of content, but don't forget to like this video subscribe to this channel. I share this video right now everywhere you can Facebook, Twitter, Getter mines whatever it is. You use that's the marketing power of that that's organic growth. It allows us to compete with the likes of CNN. That's that's your direct support. That is greatly appreciated. Here we go from CNN. U S. Intelligence indicates. Russia is preparing operation,

justify invasion of Ukraine. They say the: U S has information that indicates. Russia has pre positioned a group of operative to conduct a false fly operation in eastern Ukraine, it? U S official told scene and on Friday, in an attempt to create a pretext for an invasion. The official said the: U S is evidence that the operatives Trained and urban warfare and in using explosives to carry out acts of sabotage against Russia's own proxy forces, the alibi, in ECHO's statement released by Ukraine's Ministry of Defence on Friday, which said that run special services are preparing provocations against russian forces in an attempt to frame Ukraine. National security adviser, Jake Southern hinted at the Intel during a briefing with report on Thursday. Now I want to pause for a second just ask this question: what does this new information from CNN do for us and who benefits. If Russia right now were to stage a false flag attack would

matter? The answer is no it wouldn't. If they come out and tell you, Russia, faked it right away care? Is Russia still good invade right? Russia's I'm gonna go oh dry. They discovered our plot. Guess we better not invade. No. The point of putting this information is pretext that a new events Russia does invade a war. There is a false wag, the! U S can claim see. We told you this first. The reality is, this could be a false flat, from western forces, the? U S could be seen this so that, when they stage a pre emptive strike on Russia, they can claim see we told you. It was a false flag and when Russia retaliates. They can say how we caught them red handed this intelligence. Does nothing for any of us trying to figure out what actually going on in the region, and it says to me that the benefit for the most part in this story is to distract from Joe Buttons, ailing approval, writing and and his struggle

domestic issues and, in the event of attack by western force or ukrainian forces, give them U s a pretext to retaliate. The point is saying this does nothing good for us. I do not think it was wise to release, information, and it comes from a journalist who pay? lastly had claimed Russia Gate was definitive fact and that turned out to be wrong. The story says quote: our intelligence community has developed in. Nation, oh, has developed information. What does that mean which has now been downgraded, Russia is laying the groundwork to have the option of fabricating the pretext for an invasion. So, let's get on Thursday. We saw this play book and twenty fourteen. They are preparing this play book then, and we will have. The administration will have further details on what we see as potential Lang of the pretext to share with the press over the course of the next twenty four hours. The Ukrainian Defence Ministry said this statement,

Friday that the military units of the aggressor country and its satellite receive orders to prepare for such provocations. The? U S, intelligence, finding comes after a week's worth of diplomatic meetings between Russia and Western. If those over Russia's amassing of tens of thousands of troops along Ukraine's border with talks failed to achieve any breakthroughs as Russia would not commit to the ethical in an american and NATO official said Maskos demands, including that NATO never admit Ukraine into the alliance were non starters. A number of Ukraine's government websites were hit with a cyber attack. On Friday, the development european officials warned would ratchet up tensions over Ukraine even further. We are getting something very fascinating here. I will stress this point again: Roy shot is building troops on the border, at least if we are to believe all of

stories from every country in the region, including Russia. I mean, I think it's a fair assessment. Is that much we know it's true. The challenge here is: who do you trust? Not? Gonna, be honest. I don't trust Russia. I trust United States way more, that I trust Russia and as much as I dont like Joe Biden. I dont trust him all that much, but I'm maybe be was with you As if Joe Biden, Vladimir Putin were standing in front of me and Putin said We are not going to stage cyber attack on Ukraine or anything like that, and then but it was I he really is I'd, be like I'm gonna have to go with Biden on this. One you have to have been hidden, derangement syndrome, to think that your more you're better off, trusting Russia now, of course, the? U S lies, of course, Joe Biden lies and Howdy. Does he calmly Harris has also awful, but I still think an honest assessment would be

as much as Camilla invite an hour awful nasty and corrupt people. They benefit when the? U S benefits, not Russia, but let's be real. Is Russia really biggest threat. No, I don't think it is, and I think, when it comes to China, I'd still probably well. I gotta be honest. If she's in pay and Joe Biden we're standing in front of me enable said something I beg your lesson in either of you guys to be completely honest, based on what I know about. What's going on in Ukraine, Gazprom Victor Shokhin cutter Turkey pipeline, I think, is a fair assessment that the? U S wants Ukraine to win at. It may be due to the fact that there is a lot of interest tied into it, namely the Biden family interests that I can trust. That is corruption. I can trust, when it comes to China, Joe Biden working his private equity deals flying his son or should say flying his son and heir forced to sell his son, can work pro

would he deals in which Joe and hunters share a bank account and hunter promises. Ten percent for the big guy enough was actually hunters had that it may have been one of his partners, yet case. I don't trust their positioning on China to be completely honest, but I do think we face something serious coming out of. Russia quote the russian military plans to begin these activities several weeks before military invasion, which could begin between MID January and MID February? The official said we saw this playbook and twenty fourteen with Crimea. I want to stress another point as much as there is a serious possibility of a conflict with Russia. I dont think is our most pressing issue: Russia a regional power with a relatively small economy and we're gonna act. World WAR three is coming sorry. I still think the answer is China. Now I'm not here to play sides, I'm not here? put out. Videos look as a lot of developments and domestic policy and culture were issues, and I thought to myself as I'm going through this

I'm seeing a lot of people, push Biden Derangement Syndrome on foreign policy. Ok, I the story from Reuters, and I must tell you right now. In this instance, I agree with the Democrats. My criticism and fault with the Democrats is really about their elite. Is NEO liberal war mongering and there lies a manipulations and their crackpot called like behaviour. But a broken clock is right twice a day. and I'm not gonna sit here and just ignore it when they all right for the sake of being like they're, always there always wrong. That's not true. Take a look at the story. Tat cruises. Nord stream to sanction bill fails in U S son it now I saw many people say: look TED crews wanted to impose sanctions on Russia's Nord stream to pipeline. There were some Democrats who side with Republicans but for the most part Democrats filibustered blocking the sanctions immediate, let many lassie people on the right. So why is this TED?

rules is trying to sanction. Russia. Isn't that the playbook? All the Democrats who blocked this clearly must be russian agents. I get the point there. If the Democrats are going to block this, surely there defending Russia right well, the answer is no. There is another being presented will see what happens that would sanction Russia's Nord stream to pipeline in the event of an invasion. In my opinion, that seems more effective when we read the news explained you what's going on Reuters reports, the Senate on Thursday failed to pass a bill to slap sanctions on Russia's Nord stream to natural gas pipeline, sponsored by Republicans editor TED crews. The day after Democrats unveiled their own legislation. tally was fifty five in favour and forty four against the bill that needed sixty votes to pass a major hurdle and a fifty fifty Senate about spanned. Nearly seven hours as majority leader, Chuck Humor, considered options on voting rights legislation. Senator Robert Menendez won the support of many of his fellow Democrats, including Joe Biden for an alternative bill. He introduced

On Wednesday his legislation would impose sweeping sanctions on top russian government and military officials and banking institutions of Moscow engages in hostilities against Ukraine, nominate pause for a second time eggs entirely possible writers has given me the run around with this story. I read similar things and other outlets, but entirely possible news comes out and it shows the Democrats lied in the media back them up cause. I don't trust the mainstream press for the most part, but I will cite if the goal is to prevent Russia from invading Ukraine then said it setting a penny de on them. If they invade is smarter than just penalizing them now, if TED cruises Bill Past, and it would have just put sanctions on Nord stream to then Russia would be like what have I got to lose and thus it makes more sense. The democrat bill would put sanctions on if they crossed line but also point out Joe Biden, is the one who eased the sanctions in the first place back in May Norton

to buy in waves. U S! Sanctions on russian pipeline, so I'm sorry. I'm sorry, I'm gonna have to say this. The Democrats don't get to claim I rode by saying we useless as leverage when it was Joe Biden in the first place, who eased the sanctions you could have just left them on, but I suppose there strategy, as they said it was we'll give Russia this this concession and then hold it against them. If they do something we dont like that's kind of crazy, to be honest, but maybe makes sense. You know you give you your your kid that guy has a tent Tantrum and you say you're. So what do I mean to buy the new Pokemon game and then, if you act the full and taken it away, give him something nice and then make him not want to lose it. That actually makes sense. I talked about this before it's the plot from fast and the furious four right, but Dude says, give all the poor people something if they'll be scared to lose and you will own them so Now seeing this from Democrats, I'm not going to just simply say their insane or they're wrong for the sake of tribal, as am I actually think their plan makes more sense for

theirs. They gonna save Senator Jean Shine, a democratic, originally CO, Sponsor Nord stream to sanctions with crews voted against his bill, sang at rest community in Washington and in Europe over russian aggression against Ukraine should cruises. nation would drive a wedge between the USA and its allies, particularly Germany, the? U S as well. Some european countries, including Ukraine and Poland, opposed the pipeline, which would deprive Kiev of transit fees as well as in, These maskos leverage over Europe where gas prices have been soaring. Previously, I criticised Joe Biden for easing sanctions where he said he would use it as leverage ESA. That's ridiculous! Don't give concessions to but I can certainly be willing. I am certainly willing to admit that right now it seems like this may actually restrict Russia, in the long term. However, look I understand the idea giving someone something so that you can control their behaviour. If you have no leverage, you have nothing. I don't think we can keep playing the game of giving things up to Russia and crossing our fingers. They don't

asked us back because then what happens? Is Russia learns? Ok, all laughed, the deuce threaten the? U S give me whatever I want, that is untenable for the time being, I get it, but maybe that's fair to say their cruises position does make sense to walk back what Biden Dead, but I will stress the point again: I'm not an absolutist, I'm on a moral, absolutist, many people say like you know, ten will do a segment and he'll say one thing, but then immediately contradict that. I hope you understand the purpose of of entered. ending the new ones in these positions? As a lot I dont know it may be that TED crews is right about his position on sanctioning Nord stream to I dont know, I would just say in this house

and moment telling Russia. We will take something away from you. If you invite Ukraine seems there will be effective, not that I like it in the long term. I dont know for sure that the USA stated they are fully prepared if Russia invades Ukraine Zol Big NEWS, and I know what I want to point out. A new cycle issue as well. This stuff with war, has been going on while belt. While many of us talk about culture, war issues and buttons approval writing. I think it's important to focus on what may I, really end up to be a serious international conflict. I dont know how the U S would respond. They say there ready to respond. I dont want the? U S, to get involved, war in Ukraine. It may just be NATO, but that invariably will rope in the United States. It could just be european allies still. I think the conflict is bad, but it is Russia pushing the border and this What may be inevitable as we as well as we read already in the first report from CNN, there have been cyber attacks hitting Ukraine as the: U S,

warning you now Russia could be preparing for war. That's that's! That's a reality and be seen if Russia larger than attack on Ukraine, what might look like you're some possibilities with troops mast on Ukraine's border border Russia has many options for an attack. Experts say, including stepped short, a full scale, invasion and occupation. Many countries in Europe will not tolerate russian invasion of Ukraine, but must be. Russia already invaded there there they have proxy troops they ve taken Crimea. I want to talk to you about what I think is the actual foreign policy threat and something we focused on that. I think we are being distracted away from, to put it mildly. Pentagon worries about chinese buildup near

India. Why is that we're talking about Ukraine? Why is it that we're talking about Russia? There is this Russia Panic attack. I guess doesn't seem to make sense to me and I think it is hunter by another border charisma, Ukraine match natural gas are cut or turkey pipeline. Of course, none of this stuff is us

great. I read it all on the internet, but I believe that Joe Biden was heavily invested. Incorrect, corrupt corruptly, as it were, with getting a natural gas pipeline in Ukraine to offset Russia's natural gas monopoly in in Europe. They control large port portion. I believe, like twenty to thirty percent through Ukraine, so along comes Hunter Biden, who's on the Board of Burma, Erasmus, natural gas company. The cutter turkey pipeline was an was. It was planned for a long time, but it falls apart. Then you get the ukrainian conflict and then Donald Trump wins disrupting all of their plans. I believe the conflict with Russia and Ukraine has more to do with Joe Biden, enriching himself. Hillary Clinton in the NEO liberals enriching south and justifying it by saying where to get cheaper gas into Europe and there are ally. If that were the case, you wouldn't need to put Hunter Biden on the Board of harassment, sure I guess a CIA director of former. That would make sense, but

I enrich your own family, Joe corruption me while China is building up near India and there is a very real possibility of an actual war. That's the distraction again, I think conflict of Ukraine would be bad. It's important to pay attention to it, but the real issue is China has only from popular mechanics, China denies remarkable expansion of its nuclear arsenal, just laughable the story from just the other day. I wonder why it is that in mainstream political spaces, this is not the major headline that China, is expanding its nuclear arsenal, popular mechanics reports, you're chinese officials denied reports earlier this month that China engaged in what he calls a remarkable expansion of the country's nuclear weapons arsenal, but stopped short of denying the She was building more nukes period.

meanwhile, the? U S. Department advance claims that China will effectively triple its inventory of nuclear warheads by twenty thirty food. Come the director general of the Department of arms can, The Ministry of Foreign affairs of the People's Republic of China told chinese State television that China is still. fitted to the minimum level of nuclear weapons and its arsenal that is required for national defence. Last the Pentagon annual report on China, warn the country was aiming to build a total of seven hundred deployable thermonuclear warheads by twenty twenty seven thousand warheads by twenty thirty. The report states that China ACE of WAR at construction is so rapid that previous estimates from twenty twenty have become obsolete in just one year. In addition to too, in addition to new warheads, The report warns that China is developing new, intercontinental ballistic missiles I see becomes which are long range missiles capable of hitting the U S homeland.

Additionally, a new age, twenty nuclear capable strategic, long range bomber comparable to the American, be to a spirit. Stealth bar and a new type o nine six ballistic missile submarine are under development per the report. China, ITALY has about. One hundred I see begins, including the d ask forty one pictured above take a look at that empty and six type o forging class ballistic missile submarines each with twelve hell to missiles. China. Currently has a single type of strategic bomber, the age six capable of carrying nuclear tipped, crews, missiles together all three or a nuclear try out of air land and sea, launched nuclear weapons. China reportedly about three hundred and fifty nuclear warheads to arm these delivery systems. I believe the United States Forty five thousand could be wrong, but that the last number that I read Russia has fifty thousand the? U S s twenty five thousand

kind of has only three hundred and fifty, so you may be saying but hold on TIM. Russia has so many more nuclear weapons. Why do we view China as a bigger threat? Well, in the event of all out nuclear war? and certainly understand why Russia is more concern Turning to us, but I dont think the body is gonna, be launching nuclear weapons, its mutually assured destruction, let alone China, Russia, they probably wouldn't do it there, doing well, they're expanding their gaining territory and influence. So you know we'll see: I'm not convinced anyone going to fire nukes. It seems to me that the expansion and control of China is is more prescient as it pertains to four fifth, generational warfare. What is more worrying to me is not a nuclear weapon. Propaganda, manipulation, intelligence. We need to understand about any conflict or supervillain. Here is what I love about. Comic book villains

but but villains want to destroy the earth, but why they live here. You know, that's that's. Why think Lex Luther is such an excellent supervillain. You know who's the guy from Superman, many people who know that, because he just wants control and power to, I think doktor doom is a good supervillain because he thinks he's be in charge. They represent villainy much better than these one dimensional villains or, like I'm, going to mount the ice caps like we'll. Do you live on? This planet, the man. Why would you destroy it? Russia doesn't want to things up with nukes the? U S doesn't want to blow things up with nukes China doesn't want to either they will, if there's a cost risk analysis and and they determine that they benefit or would have more resources. In the event, they use the news, that is to say, if they feel the. U S would take.

Action that would restrict their access to resources and a nuclear weapon would preserve well, they would do it. Let's put it this way. China has one hundred widgets if trade continues and they use intelligence cyber attacks and manipulation. Well that of warfare nuts them two hundred widgets if they use a nuclear weapon, they lose widgets, but think about this. If the? U S engages in militaristic operations, be cyber attacks, intelligence, hacking etc. China could actually deplete and how many widgets they end up having, in which case fire the nukes right? That's it went to be careful of, for the time being, it seems wearing what we're dealing with fourth and fifth generational warfare, which is the reference to insurgency groups and psychological manipulation. China, of course,

as the belgian Road initiative there doing, economic expansion, their engage in economic expansion in South America and Africa and their outpacing? The? U S, and thus we run the risk of encountering through cities, trap the fact that China's rapid economic expansion has already outpaced Russia and thereby believe their set to be bigger than the? U S, I think they may be bigger than the: U S or or their about to be in a few years. It's dangerous. There is a real fear of war my concern that or their elements within the Eu S who recognise this and decided and and their deciding that avoiding new your war is the most important position to take, and thus the U S should seek to. China is a tough decisions. My friends, I do not have access to classified information I cannot see, behind the garden and for all I know, there's some intelligence behind the scenes laughing saying this to pull them, if only he knew he thinks he's so smart ridden popular

mechanics. Meanwhile, they got a report on China's already far the nuclear weapons and they ve got space battles going on. I have no idea. May on the information we haven't, I mean that's happening. I think it's fair to say. War with China is much more prescient. Much more likely to occur. Take a look at this from Reuters. U S, would block defence contractors from using chinese rare earths, less it's interesting January, Fourteenth a bipartisan piece of work. play some introduced in the Us Senate on Friday, woodforest defense contractors to stop buying rare earth from China by two thousand and twenty six and use the Pentagon to create a permanent stockpile of strategic minerals. There are many globalists neoliberals believe trade is how avoid war? China won't go to war with the? U S if it turns out that it would damage them economically, like I said they want more

it's not less. Nuclear war means less for everybody, but if it means more than losing a war than they probably do it, but what if China has very strong trade relations with the? U S, and the? U S separating because of war means they would go without wealthy chinese individuals in the Communist Party want control power and access it. I want to lose it, and thus war could be bad for them. They are better off. I off american politicians and officials so that they just gain more getting into a war, is bad news so what happens when the? U S says we're bringing our factories back or ending free trade, and we're not buying your rare, worse rare earths anymore, that segments trade and thus the theory would be, or the hypothesis would be-

China has more incentive to attack because they're losing now, but I tell you this, I don't I don't. I don't like the idea of. I don't like the utilitarianism. This idea that we're going to sacrifice what we have today out of fear of what may come tomorrow. It is true, I believe, and making long term investments. It is true that we did it. We do everything in our power to avoid war with China, but that doesn't come at the at the expense of our own dignity and our own resources, giving away our jobs and by our own are medicines and a rare earth only from China empowers them at its. Why there are threat in the first place we cut him off twenty years ago and said: do you think do hours. We wouldn't have to worry about war, because we would be in control. It's not easy rebel. The answers, man, I don't. no. What I do know is the Russia stuff is probably a distraction: serious shore, but probably a distraction from Newsweek? China tries to

tone down war talk as military tells Taiwan to surrender now from military dot com. Taiwan adds mine laying to defences against China. Can the? U S defined Taiwan? Will Taiwan ultimate ye be the catalyst for a major war? No matter what we do, it could be Taiwan is, is important, and there are many questions, though, why should we care about Ukraine? And if that question is to be asked, why should we about Taiwan and we can answer that. Taiwan produces silicon chips and we need them. Why don't we just use them here in the? U S, why don't? We have rare earths here in the? U S, we do I'm untold in Alaska specially, but we just don't mind them. There were the rare they're called rare earths, but there Surely everywhere, we just rely on China to do all that work for us because they have liked better deposits. I guess not. b. We should start relying

ourselves and not relying on China for the time being that what we do ask that that's why we defend Taiwan. Well. Another reason why we defend Taiwan could just be that we want approved Vietnam to the Philippines, to Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, etc that we're gonna, protect them China will not be allowed to expand and colonize the region they probably will try to. As for Ukraine, well there's a lot of people there to who don't want to live on the boot of Russia. They want a better economy and they have well it's the most fertile farmland in Europe's on pole, and it's really important for the rest of these that you know they can export food and things like that and another of the same resources like silicon ships, but I can tell you the lower standard of living. The lower cost of living makes it really cost effective for technology companies to hire human labor.

Coating development, someone who dies coding and Ukraine is gonna, be making like a thousand times more than your average ukrainian citizens. No joke, I was told that could be a times, have changed, but The average ukrainian monthly salary was the equivalent of four hundred dollars, but somebody who was develop, are working on tech programmes, mobile apps. They could be making a hundred thousand dollars per year, which is not really a thousand times higher, but it is a lot higher than the average salary. So for the? U S, having access to ukrainian labour intact development is very important, may be almost important as getting silicon ships from Taiwan. I don't know about this about, we hire american citizens. We dont worry about the laboring in Ukraine, I mean it is benefiting the people there and helping their economy about. We just focus on our own economy, because we have very serious problems here about. We start setting of factories and

you asked. We rely on our own country, our own labour. We secure our own borders and we stop acting like the world police. It's easy to say it is the? U S has been to a certain degree of stabilizing factor on the world, but let's be real. It's also been massively destabilizing figure on their own particular limit, particularly in the Middle EAST. So I can see here and tell you all of these things and speculate wildly. Ultimately, I end with saying I hope this information was informative and you are free to agree or disagree, because I honestly don't I don't have all the answers. I don't want war to happen, so maybe it's all just one big distraction from Joe Buttons domestic failures, or maybe we really do have something on the horizon that would be devastating to the world. I suppose we will just sit back and see how things develop Ali their necks segments coming up at eight p m over at Youtube outcomes lashed him guest. I arel thanks Rhino, we'll see you all them. Joe Rogan and sedition trending this morning, not together, I just

it's kind of funny that I wake up get to my computer and I see the what's happening, tab showing Joe Rogan is trending and beneath them is sedition. Just To show you what our priorities are. These days, damn. There is something to talk about when it comes to Joe Rogan. What's going other slaves controversy on the episode of his podcast, where he had Josh Zepps the B C broadcaster, Australia BC, not America, yet a conversation oh Cardenas risk in kids and Joe. Got criticism, because I guess you didn't addressed it well enough, and I will be I will actually pylon, I suppose and say I think Joe didn't address it on his show properly, because the issue of my card data and vaccination is an interesting one and there was a very simple point Joe could have up, but I M actually not here too, to criticise Joe. I will also add, as that I've done like how many segments about Joe in the past couple of weeks. I actually find it strange and I kind of

I didn't want to be doing assignment discussing what's going on around your Rogan, but let's be real, the biggest oh biggest podcast, from the biggest chose period, where the biggest political shows period he just had Mc Mass. IRAN is Joe and Joe has made himself one of the most relevant politically relevant figures just by the work he's doing, I'm sure he Billy doesn't see it. You know as nearly as big as many others do, but its resolving it in a wave of press around these ideas and in the culture war. The point that the rich I thought it was through. It would be a great to address this issue of market access. Vaccination jargon as progress is because Joe Rogan and sedition are trending. The issue of sedition has to do with the oath keepers, ten of whom were charged with seditious conspiracy and of the eleventh being their leader, Stuart roads. Mrs very Syria stuff. All of a sudden. You ve got a established,

that authoritarian publications sang aha sedition. It's here, Glenn Greenwell brings up a really great point. He said after year of there being no evidence of sedition and no charges related insurrection, Merrick Garland under pressure. As ok, we will arrest more people and now, a year later, we're getting sedition charges. So anybody paying attention. It's obvious, the net. it was busted. Insurrection wasn't playing out in all of a sudden merit garlands like ok, we got it everything that these people are being charged with we knew about it. Just took him this long to do it because merit Garland was under political pressure that just goes to show. The huge problems were facing in this country is opening its ripped apart, which brings in me now to what I think is also very relevant and its

no Rogan, honest, Joe Joe tweeted. If anyone was gonna, make me look down on the podcast, I'm glad it's Josh adapts, because I love him when he's awesome. However, this is why I was confused. You know Joe Robins. Fantastic is a good day and this just goes to show why he is a good- do Josh Zepps on robins show here is not a good dude. He is duplex Yes, he's a liar he's a estate propagandist Joe, call them out in many ways, but Joe is still trying to be nice to the guy, and I respect that because I have do similar things, but I dont think I don't think I'm here, nice is Joe. I try to insult people, but I have certainly insulted people or Or just gotten frustrated or angry with them, because it is a line you know if you get a guy for ABC, this guy Josh Saps, the guy who came out and said that the quarantine camps where people are being taken without due process

work international arrival bungalows and he said that I was incorrect for calling them out then shown up shortly after they start detaining people without charge or trial. Ok, ok, ok, but I feel like I'm up. engine. The story here is Joe responded to what happened on his show. He says the video is cringing, but happens when you stumbling along form. Podcast, when you didn't know, subjects is going to come up and you win it. Does this subsidy article on the nature of medicine paper on the nature of medicine paper revisited by Vena. Precisely this is what Joe Rogan us posted now in the clip. This is really important. Stuff, that's also dangers of I'm here, I'm sure

doesn't like it, Joe Rogan, sad that the risk of mild Cardenas in children is like with two to four tie. It increases the risk of my card. I dislike two to four times on, like that. There have been many papers only slow down. There are few studies on a big jumping, precise that show for young boys. The vaccine increases their risk of Male Cardenas Josh's apps than correctly states that the risk of mild card data from Cove it is actually higher in children. Joe says he doesn't think this is true. Joe is actually correct, and now I bring you my friends to the issue of alternative facts and how it gets really difficult to navigate. What's going on in the world, Josh's apps

right, I'm a fan of the guy. Was I've been arguing with and for some time, but the risk of mild Cardenas from covered is worse than the risk of male Cardenas from the from the vaccine. However, there is one study we have this from the guy In sum from September boys, more at risk from Pfizer, jab side effect then covered suggests study. This is one study and that's it and but there are many more studies showing that my card data from covered is this- is it higher risk of it. You point they understand is Joe looked at this study and he said, while that that's interesting, and then he brought it up when we talked about this until cast iron. Well, when the study about four months ago, I think we did a very good job of trying to break this down pointing out. Look you get one study, its report

in the press. It's more reported by right wing source and left wing sources. It doesn't mean its one hundred percent. True, because you still it's hard to navigate the space. The guardian reported healthy boys may be more likely to be admitted to the hospital with a rare side effect of the Pfizer violent at covered vaccine that causes inflammation of the heart, then, with co itself U S. Researchers claim their analysis of medical data suggests that boys aged twelve to fifteen. With underlying medical conditions, are forty six times more likely to be diagnosed with vaccine related mile Cardenas than ending up in a hospital with covered over a four month period. But this not my understanding, as this is not about markup Mile Cardenas. Now the reason I say just correct on the Rogan podcast: they pull up the latest data, which says the risk of my car data from Cove. It is actually higher. A mathematical professional, I'm not here, to tell you what is true or not true, I'm here to try and give you

some scepticism, some healthy scepticism, so that, ultimately you talk to a trusted. Melick professional. My view is You go to your doctor, you say hey, I saw this article in the guardian, it says boys are more at risk from the Pfizer Jab side effects than covert. What do you think if your doktor can't give you satisfactory answers, find a better doctor? And I say this all the time if I hire a carpenter to build a deck- and I say what's the length of this wood and what's the what? What? What's that we wait load of this particular piece of wood relative to see a stronger. What, I dont know I'd be like. I should probably get someone who actually does no good to be standing on this thing. The point is, we are trying navigate the space and you ve got politics playing a role in We think so. Naturally, when Joe Rogan, in my opinion, is an honest conversation and brings up these points, he gets attacked because there is a political agenda behind everything. And yes, there is a political agenda behind many people on the right to move our very up.

to the vaccine and that's why, when the story came out tons of people on the right, we're saying like look, see, look not every single person, mind you and my response was that's crazy. It's one study taken into consideration. Ask your doctors about it. Like you, I mean I'm, not gonna, look at this and be like all its definitive truth. I do think, however- the data has shown there is a risk of Mile Cardenas following sink sequential covered nineteen vaccinations by agents acts we have this from mad or acts ivy. This was pose. I think Genuine posted this. There is a reality here. Absolutely Joe correctly points out in his show as well that if you're gonna vaccinate three hundred million Well, I mean jeeringly giving out six hundred million doses and now, with boosters nine hundred million yeah you're gonna get a high number of adverse events from the vaccination. That's a fact, but but think about this.

well we're really interested in is vaccine adverse events per capita, not necessarily total numbers. I often see people on the right are talking about the various report of like twenty one thousand deaths reported in bears. Ok, and while it is through that various is report as individuals reporting that you know what happened. It's not. These reports are not like a doctor, get point an autopsy and said something was true. Its people saying hey. my dad got the vaccine within a day. He had a heart attack was in the hospital and things like that, but the important factor as people are highlighting this insane look at Vera's. Woe when we rolled out this vaccine there was only a thousand others. Twenty one thousand what's happening and unlike we're doing a mass vaccination roll out, so the number is larger, meaning adverse events will be a larger number as well. We need to break it down by percentage. I am not here Tell you what you should. I should do. Your health men is all on you. I am here to point out that I think

Joe, is the honest one in the room and the other guy is the dishonest one in the room. Let me Lenny limit. Let me tell you, I'm just put a very simply: they see director will lend said last summer. The one thing that axiom can't do is prevent transmission, and I think that's evident by what we are seeing now in New York City, particularly with the all mccrone variant, while they're saying it's over and I don't know they testword, but New York is one of the most vaccinated places in the country and their seeing a record surge in covered cases around twenty five percent of nations covered cases, I believe, come out of New York. Ok, you transmission is rampant. Now here's where it's worth interesting in the conversation Joe Rogan had with Josh UPS. He was correct when he said there is an increased risk of my Cardenas from the vaccines. That's true we ve. it. Ultimately, I think it's a cost benefit analysis that you need to talk to a medical professional about if you're concerned about it, I believe, even the CDC or was it the FDA. One of em made an advisory about John

and Johnson due to I think it was blood clots, I'm not sure, but we ve seen these reports have come out of the EU regulators have talked about you know, suspending certain vaccines are over fears of Mouth Cardenas in blood clots. These adverse events exist, but I believe the official response was that that the likelihood of experience them is substantially lower than a complication from covered, which brings me to the bigger point. If you can still get covert, then my question is this and a break it down Jos responds to Josh that, in my opinion, should have been oh wow. I didn't realize that there was a higher risk of Mile Cardenas from covert according to the latest data and not the vaccines. I suppose, then, if you give a child a vaccine, but they are still able to get covered than there

to have a higher risk of my card Titus. Then, if they worked vaccinated, correct, but that's an interesting point. Isn't it? Ultimately, I dont have the full picture right. What I mean is, even if you get less air tickets vaccinated and he has a higher risk of our car data Then he ends up getting covered. But if the vaccines reduce the severity of symptoms, which is what you know, basically all of the mainstream reporting has told us, then maybe he has build better off, even if he has a greater risk of mild Cardenas. I guess we can break down this way. Mile Cardenas is not the only complication. There are many other things to consider and I'll tell you men, I experienced covered and it was the worst honest I've ever experienced. I don't know why I had it so bad. Some people have said United, I was asked, do regret well, you know what I'm not gonna too much and would just I've had people I've seen people down play it.

I would not wish cover on anybody? I think it's really bad and I've had some very scary. It's scary, it is not an monseigneur for me, obviously I was worry enough to call a doctoring medical treatment, but I know people have and and I'm really worried about him. I know people have gone to the e r no says he knows many people who went to the er are due to vaccination adverse events. I actually do know a handful well a couple people I want to make some very precise in this a couple people that I know personally definitively had adverse reactions to the vaccine, but this is look. It's it's an its known. I suppose the challenge here is conversations like this are impossible to have because of Youtube threat of censorship, and so we have of people who are refusing to speak about it, a lot of people. Scared to speak up about it and thus we're not getting a legitimate conversation on cost benefit. Analysis which I can't tell you. I can't tell you what you should choose to do right. You got oh doctor, you mean you make sure that they they give

sound advice and I'd aside from not one to get banned. I also don't want to be legally responsible for advocating, for some kind of you know cookie treatment, knowing that so I ll just put it this way I know people who have one of the e are actually up. I know more. I know more people who have gone to the e r from the vaccine than I do from covert and that that's that that to me is crazy, but it's hard to its hard to break down their different and it was different things. You know one person had had nerve damage, but they were mostly they're just having there is shaking one person actually really sick from the vaccine and you know to me and my family confirmed, but if you the CDC website. If you go to the FDA website, they will tell you there are adverse events from the vaccine. They're not saying it's, not true. The problem This problem is websites like the daily beast. Look, you do have elements of the right that will say

all the various reporting. This proves it. No it doesn't it. You need to consider the fact that if you give bull scaling problem, I refer to it. If you give a million people a vaccine- There is a point, one percent chance of volume, of address events and it plays out. Well now you ve got a thousand sick people and you get this news, and people like there are a lot of stories about this and then, if you do it, do a hundred million people die of a hundred thousand people in the hospital everyone's gonna be losing their minds the proposal it is the same, but because you give it to more people, it more stories and humans have that bias. That's something very important. Consider Joe Rogan did bring that up in an honest conversation the daily be says. Joe Rogan is mainstreaming right wing misinformation. What's what is right wing about any of that I just I am so sick of the cult. Ok, it's a cult. The daily beast, your occult your called leaders, you put out cult, garbage.

German, at an honest conversation, he read the guardian: is this insane right wing information from the guardians stupid effing? I won't swear this time like I did yesterday. What about Joe Rogan is wing? What does he said that he's dead? Is peace pro life, his approach, gay marriage? She wants traditional families. What is even mean right wing information, it's the guardian. For Heaven's sake. This is the stupidity of the modern era, and this is what I just can't stand about. What you know the media reports something Joe Rogan says it. The media calls him right. Wing shut your stupid crackpot mouth I am just I'm glad to see job islands. Could it be an approval writing at thirty, three percent fouche trust. At thirty one percent, you must be

truly stupid to believe these people. At this point, is what I see when I see job in trending alongside sedition. What that means is, while certainly one is more important than the other. In my opinion, you can see the culture war is so real that Joe in bringing up a guardian article on his show is called for wing misinformation, because these people are effing psychopath EC cult members if you are so stupid that for to go? You read the guardian, and today the daily beast tells you we misinformation and you're. Like ok, that's correct, then please, please bow of the political space. This is the insanity of the modern condition. The database he's got a bigger audience than Tucker Carlsson and shown entity combined and just might be doing

more damage, media matters Alex Patterson Peterson says, on the latest new abnormal I dont care. The daily beast is a crackpot psychopathic website that rights garbage. Yet, of course, most probably knew that's where I live and bring it up. Well, I guess the issues because Joe Rogan is treading on twitter because other crackpot cult members are putting up garbage information. So do do me this favor do Joe Rogan. This favor share the guardian article share his tweet and ask your your cult, member friends and family. How is it right wing misinformation when its reported by the guard is the guardian right wing and see what they say because that visit this is how we break the narrative. Now to be fair. We are given their CNN ratings are down. Ninety percent. Thank you, sir. One up, there must truly be fire. You know, B B,

helping us out- or maybe it's just evil- will not provide see ends. Psychotic babbling is now on is it no people and even watching anymore? Thank you good. I ask you this. in relation to what Joe Rogan saying what have I said on my show, guest IRA Tyrell is right wing. Yes, he doesn't mean anything, You know I was what we were talking about. The other day we had met Gibbey, libertarian feller We are the show, and I said I and I brought this up we're talking about this and I was like what about this show is rightwing. Luke has goes on these anti trump rents and the Trump supporters are like Luke. Raw in he slammed tromp heavily, and then I actually defended Trump, and that's always been my position. My position is like stop making me defend the guy you know, but when you go trumped around hence in dude right now. We ve got this posts from our in sea. Research,

claiming that commonly Harris told people to do Google, as if she said, if you find information. Do Google because she never said that and not, means going around words. Clauses do google it so annoying. I dont want to defend, MILAN Harris but don't lie about what she said, she did not tell people to do. Google. She said when people are King for something across town. They usually do google it that's it. What that's if, if you're like when people are trying to I may large platform, usually do jump on it. You don't say: do jump to get on top of the ladder. That's me quoting are, and why are you doing that you stupid enough? You don't need to do it. I don't care what the left or the right quote, people properly, so we can properly inform people and they can make better decisions for their lives. But I tell you this is the exception on the right? Is the rule on the left, the guardian reports, this boy's more at risk from Pfizer, jab side effect than covered study suggests. Does that means definitively true?

It's one study it was reported by the guardian ensample. I had a report in September, Joe Rogan quotes it and the left maximum calls it right. Wing misinformation. Just please help break people from this cult. It seems like we are winning and I'm very happy with that. The more Joe Rogan talks, the better off we are but showing the article from the guardian. I am what what I can't stand. You know what I can't say exactly that commonly Harris scenario they post the quote firmer. I watched the owners, I teach you really tell people to do, Google, that's crazy, and then she didn't. And why are you putting out this trash and I just can't stand a man? I don't care about the left. I don't care about the right. I don't care about up down whatever I care about. it. Information and I are you know when I see everything they lied about with Trump it frustrate

buddy. I forgot about it that point about you, know IRA, good I've got derailed. What about that show is right. Wing right, right and left, don't mean anything anymore so on TIM Guest, I rallied looks very libertarian and Argo Capitalist kind of kind of character, not a fan of trumpets. Republicans. The Democrats and as this weird authoritarian left, leaning, tech guy Lydia producer she's. Just traditional conservative then you have me, which is like centre left, post, liberal politically homeless. Frequently, defending tromp while being somewhat critical of, and we have an eclectic voice and we have these disagreements and that we bring various personalities, guests typically conservative and libertarian types, some leftist we actually just have a liberal on the show Bosnia and she was fantastic, but the left really does want to come on the show they call it right wing, they call it right wing and you know what men so be if right wing just means like real world. Fine

I remember that line when Colbert sad Ray He has a liberal bias. Perhaps that was the case. twenty years ago, good sir, but today Ya'Ll living cracked. fantasy land where four months after left wing the guard and publishes data they're, calling it right wing misinformation. So please spare me Joe Rogan is not right wing. Nothing he promotes is right. Wing dude is in favour of universal basic income for Heaven's sake, but here we are welcome to the modern condition, my friends, but you heard it here very Let me show you this omission from the New republic in a sick, the three ruling the Supreme Court upholds the covered pandemic. Oh shut up, you lunatics, but whatever its frustrating, isn't it look?

It would help me out if you share these videos. I think I do a good job of breaking down my points and, if you think it's its effective, please consider sharing this with people who are trapped in the matrix, but the very least All you need do is take the daily beast article in the garden article and ask your friends and family about it is Joe row, in spreading. Rightly misinformation. The articles, the guardian, is that right wing. How does that make sense? unless we large so far left word, but what is left even me at this point. What is right, weighing misinformation mean it's so dumb right. Misinformation like what traditional families are good for children, whatever I'm over it. Next augments coming up at one p m on this, gentle thanks ran up and I'll see. You owe them. Men used to be manlier, that's not the trumpets, it's true writers has this story from back in two thousand and seven men's test.

Asked her own levels declined in the last twenty years and we have this story from Forbes. You are not the man, your father. was among millennial men. Your tea levels are getting low. Many of you may be familiar with the famous video from the Tri guys. I think they were with Buzzfeed. They went out. Got there too tossed her own levels, checked and boy was it bad These young men, who I believe were in their twenties, had tests. strong levels equal to that of eighty year old men. and I certainly blame the guys. I guess I can blame our culture I can blame our parents and you know- The things you can do at my understanding to increased levels is exercised. Work out, lift some waits each some red meat. we are a nation of increasing femininity, and we have in the media, the constant berating of men being told that they are toxic. We masculine, which

not true. There certainly is toxic masculinity, but most men are just positively masculine, but as we demonize men more and more and more. There is one direction. We are headed towards my friends and it's very simple, come his arm and you can blame the women I'm kidding by the way, I'm only half actually it which brings me to the main point of this segment esteem, from the New York Times. The gender gap is taking us to unexpected places, surprising. Would it be too many of you to find that communism arises out of more feminine viewpoints and cultural desires? This is not to deal eyes, women or say they're wrong. In fact, I think the feminine viewpoint is important nay essential to a functioning society but as with talks, masculinity, there is also toxic femininity and if you have

Imbalance is where the problem arises, and today, my friends, the problem has arisen. Now, if I take a look at may be somewhat traditional values or or individuals who express them. You have the mother and father. male the man's role in the women's role and how they complement each other and create a functioning and successful society, but what happens when women are suppressed and oppressed? You become cold and violent, more prone to taking risks, and this is making this up actually data. When females female influence enters the political space war is less likely. This is actually what we're bringing the York times. The problem we face now is an inversion. It appears that authoritarianism may become more likely, as women start getting a disproportionate amount of power? To put it simply, this is me basically saying it appears, based on my assessment, that the appropriate level of male

male balances equal, but we'll have equal right now. We have among millennial, women. Seventy percent are Democrat and, among Republicans, fairly evenly split between men and women, but slightly less women are Republicans. This is me that male testosterone decreases, many men start behaving very weakly and becoming less charismatic, less prone to risk. Taking you get an overwhelming good, disproportionate amount of femininity in a government which leads to authoritarianism and, on the back, this up not just science, but also an interesting article about the russian Revolution and how women can see what women the time were seen as all or willingly conservative, but how many of you may, eight and that makes no sense. Women are progressives, their left, no they're communal and authoritarian, and this explains a whole lot.

not everything. But let me start by reading the story from the New York Times, which breaks down the gender gap is taking us to unexpected places. Well, I, if you ve been reading this news for the past twenty years, You'Re- probably not surprised by this. I have not been researching the stuff that long and I'm not surprised by this, because I've read stories like this for a while, now going back several years, Are they going to say you know blah blah blah did studies they found. Women are more likely to be in college and all these things they say, while liberal and latin invocation among female students reached a high and twenty sixteen male students remained far below their nineteen. Seventy one high the interesting thing here is that Males used to be more left, leaning than women, but, alas, let me just point out something you understand about the semantics here and how left and right shift and change. I'm gonna make a bold, right now, and just tell you outright that if we are going by the classical terminology of left and right, it is fair to say that it may be fair,

that say: Hassan the left wing, as he's called streamer, is actually further right wing than I am as his Vash, and this is going back to the classical definitions of left and right from the french Revolution, where the right or the aristocracy they the status quo and the left were the revolutionaries. If you watch my show or you watched him, guests were fairly reformist to revolutionary. We are not overtly revolutionary nonviolent, but we are also very anti establishment and anti status quo to a certain extent. We like the constitution, but we call for a radical changes in this country. When it comes to mass of multinational corporations, the populist view tends to be there in the working class. Now you may end up in this weird situation where the aristocracy and the proletariat left, whatever they want to call themselves, are in alignment, which is strange, but it doesn't mean it's true

when we do a show and TIM cast our where we rag on unit party establishment, politics from the left and the right were critical of Donald Trump, but defend him in certain respects. We call for say abolishing the Federal Reserve and we want the legalization of wrecks drugs are all fairly revolutionary ideas. Now we respect the constitution because it safeguards human rights, but that's not reactionary, in fact Luke, when on a rather day against Donald Trump, for some reason you get the likes of Hassan envoy. Should I single amount, but their promise. Multinational corporation and status quo government mandating medical procedures on people. That's a big one. For me, that's very now now Hassan is talked about how he wants to national lies the medical industry, but that still not revolutionary. That's actually authoritarian and backs up a lot of my points if the power structures are currently in play like in place, the big pharmaceutical companies there already in power

and the response from the left is to enshrine their power at a national level. That's not left wing in the classical sense. That's actually in support of the aristocracy. It would enshrine their powers now, of course, maybe they're saying they want to completely dismantle the system and replace those who are in charge with someone else that still bolsters the bolsters the intelligentsia and the intellectual elites in the revolution and in their version of the revolution I do think is fair to say in reality, left and writer, plainly meaningless and stupid to argue that I or they or anybody is left or right and just tribal signifies this point. But let's talk about. Let's get back to gender and the significance here, they're gonna, say then I found an Iphone nation survey and twenty seventeen of three thousand fourteen college students asked if you had to choose, which do you think, is more important. First, an inclusive society or protecting free speech rights, men sixty

one thousand thirty nine in favour of free speech, women sixty four to thirty, five in favour of diverse society. Mature These are both male and female college. Students in the night Foundation survey support the view that the first amendment should not be used to protect hate speech, but the men were more equivocal at fifty six to forty four then women at seventy one to twenty nine. So when you hear hate speech must be banned, it is women overwhelmingly saying this, but could it be that it is directly tied to testosterone and those who have taken high levels of testosterone being more pro or or having natural high levels? Being more prone to risk taking. That is to say, I understand the problems of hate speech. However, I think the risk is worth the reward we can't just lock down and keep every safe, and therein lies the advanced towards communism, authoritarianism, corporatism or fascism. The more feminine a person is

the more likely they are to prefer safety over risk. Now far, be it from me to pretend, like I'm an evolutionary psychologist, but I'd be willing to against it hearing the thoughts of say you know a bright Weinstein's or on this, that I pronounce it on broadcasting or any other evolutionary biologist and psychologists to discuss the ideas as to why it is women tend to prefer safety and men tend to take risks. One hypotheses- and this actually may be theoretical- may be conserved scientific fact. For now I don't know is that men are disposable, so in the early nomadic tribes of of humanity, women must be protected and kept safe because they were creating and nurturing life However, you dont need that many men to create nurture life, but you do need many women. So what happens?

is the men are able to take risks because if they die, you still have some men to have babies with the women, but the women, those who create life, if you lose women than you struggle to make more babies, and thus a natural tendency emerged women that prefer. Safety tended to survive more and a society that protected women was more likely to produce more babies and, as such, the majority of humanity tends to fault flow in that direction. It's not absolute, but that's out. Revolution tends to work and I think that's true a missing it's. My personal hypothesis of ring loves information we're going to save the data on college students reflects trends and the electorate at large. The Pew Research centre, via the times with survey data showing that, among all voters, Democrats are fifty six percent female. While Republicans are fifty two percent mail for a combined gender gap of eighteen points, pew

Identical gender splits among voters would edify as liberal and those at and conservative I'd like to throw it back to it. Dot: COM, Vauxhall article, I've reference quite a bit June twentieth. Twenty eighteen Republicans have a millennium woman problem nearly Seventy percent of young women say they are leaning towards democratic candidates in the midterms. Now, why is that my opinion is status quo safety, no taking risks. I'd like to bring you back in time, my friends to the Bolshevik Revolution from the website, bowl, dot info not entirely sure if it's the most factual historical assessment, but they do say this and I find it interesting before them Lucian. Ok, so this is the soviet revolution. Might you before the revenue

women were seen as the most conservative layer of the working class being directly responsible for care of the family? They often hesitated and were even opposed to taking strike action, but this turns into the eggs into its exact opposite when living conditions had become intolerable, with a lack of red, the spiralling inflation and with many them with their husbands, fighting on the front? Thus women workers, especially in textile industries, having reached the limit? was humanly endurable, decided, take action. Steve Bettin mentioned this. Wait, I'm on the show he said in the french revolution. It wasn't until the women came out and marched. At the revolution actually happened, men are willing to take stand up, but women less likely so it wasn't till in the Bolshevik Bolshevik Revolution, that women they were so strained at the safest course of action was revolution that it actually occurred when I'm with what that means

in the status quo as bad as everything had gotten in the Soviet it all in the Inn pose a precision Russia, women, were on willing to strike men had pointed out. There is a very serious problem. Something there are unhappy with food was harder and harder to come by and then women said I don't want to engage. It is not safe. Now, maybe it's an unfair assessment by all means criticised me: income Allow us what you think, but it seems like women being less risk of more averse to risk than not wanting to engage. It was only when it was so obvious to them that they had no food and changing to occur, that they actually rose up and took political act. What do we have now, while in the United States we have a hard core authoritarianism across the board vaccine mandates? Why it's safe? Now, in my opinion, I should think it's risky, but if you are trusting of the US

employment in the status quo, when they come out and tell you, this is safe You are more likely to adhere to suit the authority as opposed to risk of entering off and doing something drastic for what you have no data. I can actually respect the position, but there is a tendency between many women to differ in this regard. I once worked for a company where I was one of five directors. and I believe that the other four were female. The company was having very serious problems. We were the ones running it, so we had to make a decision a decision was dramatic, risky change. It may her. In the short term, but our long term prospects will greatly in improve,

I was. I was voted against the women said an innocent of direct paraphrase a bit, but almost direct quote. I was told it's just a storm and we must whether it stay the course my response was the ship is sinking and if we don't take a dramatic change and venture off into a direction for which we know very little, we will sink my attitude and I firmly believe this was. We may not know what lies to the west, but we do know. If we keep going straight, we will stay in a storm. The response from them is, but if we stay through the storm and stay the course our plan will work and storms happen It's not wrong to assume, but I find it interesting as I reflected upon it, that my reaction was take the risk. We know not what lies in that direction, but it's better than staying in bad weather and their response was what we ve done has always worked so stay the course in the storm will end. Of course. In the end I was proven

right to a certain degree. Now we still don't know what lie to do west of our ship in the storm, but the company failed and they failed miserably lot of people got fired. And work out very well and may be, the best bet would have been the risk, even if we didn't succeed, but when I take a look at these historical revolutions of the french Revolution to the communist readily It says to me that and I'm not saying it's a bad thing we're and have a desire to maintain the status quo, because it's the safest option and that's really important men can do dumb things. I mean men, speed in cars, going a hundred and twenty miles an hour and crashing and dying, and women don't do those things. So, what's my point in all this,

To me right now, I think one of the biggest problems in our country is the feminist nation of men and the disproportionate amount of power among female among more feminine voices. Women are essential to a functioning society and they, in my opinion, need to have a role in government on policy, but it needs to be well balanced. With the masculine view, there needs to be an honest assessment of risk taking verses risk of. version, but when you have nothing but risk aversion, you're driving towards a cliff while someone is screaming at you look, I understand we might crash, but we're going to go off a cliff. If we don't move in some instances, have a guy saying we have no choice but to turn, and it turns out the woman is correct. The point is, if you're, having a rational, honest discussion about the way we're supposed to be going, it seems like you, need a positive mail and masculine and feminine voice in this picture.

but we're not getting that overwhelmingly we're getting a more feminine take on things and What I mean by this, like to back it up, is when our culture is moving heavily towards censoring hate speech, and that is the feminine perspective we are, we aren't we are in balanced and they are going to create problems, yes, I don't like hate speech, but we understand why we accept the risks are, to a certain degree, the feminine view. is no no, no shouted down its unsafe and what we ve been were hearing endlessly safety safety, safety, safety, vaccine mandates and what's happened. Our economy is collapsing. It's about time. We take the masculine approach, least balance out the approach and say: can we have safety while still accepting some risk, because if we only do saving bad things happen from NPR twenty eighteen female voters, marriage gap and the midterms married women tend to have.

or conservative beliefs in and vote more up off for more Republicans, while single women tend to be aligned more Democrats, that dynamic shift may that economic may shift in this year's mid term. Sets twenty team now could be that women who are conservative are more likely to get married. It could be that women with a masculine presence in their lives are more likely to vote Republican. I dont know I do think it. However, or to point out that seventy percent of young women are leaning democratic. Perhaps it is just that women who are conservative get married, like I said

but suffice it to say as more and more young people aren't getting married and having kids, you are going to get an increasingly more feminine electorate and political body, in which case, in my opinion, without the proper balance of of male and female energy, you could collapse eclipse you guys you, the matrix, spoiler alert for those I didn't see has been for some time now, but that's basically the premise of the matrix I've, if us again emphasise spoiler, but the premise of the movie as much as many people tried clammy. It was well. all that was that the system could not survive without the male and female presence and the yearning for each other. Although those particularly conservative, I mean think about it, if men and women don't wanna, be together the matrix collapses, that was the premise that so so the idea was, The initial matrix didn't survive at anomalies that eventually broke down NEO being that a combination of the anomalies in this new matrix,

by having NEO and Trinity separate, but next to each other, constantly yearning for each other. It solidified the system and allowed the matrix to do away with the anomalies as people finally accepted it. too silly idea from in the movie. But the general metaphor is that if men and women don't desire each other, your civilization will collapse. Fighting Willie, robbed, politics will become unbalanced and I think that's fair, a fair point

I actually agree with it. I believe, as I stated, you needed an honest balance between masculine and feminine energies and for a long time we had nothing but masculine energies. Now we're shifting towards the feminine- and I don't think that's gonna- help us at all in the work of the New York Times. They point out that there is a pacifying effect to women in politics. I now think that makes sense a really do it. It makes sense to me. Maybe it's not right that with a hard core patriarchy and unless women involved in politics, you are more likely to get risk. Taking so you're gonna end up with more chaotic outcomes, harder pricked, entrepreneur warfare. For instance, when you bring women to the picture, there's morbid a desire for safety, which means there'll, be a pacifying effect, saying, do not go to war. If we don't have to that can be a good thing. It can be a bad thing, but you get an inverted

Of this problem, when you only have safety, you get people unwilling to take risks to challenge things that need to be challenged, and thus you end up with authoritarianism Yoda with communism and corporatism. You end up with people, so you know with people voting for or supporting lockdown mandates etc, which destroy lives. So it's in my opinion. You know, I look back, adds tribal warfare and things like this, and I don't know exactly what I was like, which it did have a major donor. Patriarch after a long period of time, conflict are to arise, men became you, no more dominant politics and women to a certain degree of swimming always played a role in politics, and thus you ended up with conquest. Worn conflict so may argue that actually greatly benefited mankind, but there also has a lot of death, so I actually think we can slow down. We can have progress without burning the system down. We can recognise that conflict as a natural part of life be in the attic.

Kingdom or inhuman civilization- and we can also recognise that we need to have that balance of of masculine energy, anthem and energy feminine energy? The point is, I see this and I see that out of New York Times and they say women overwhelmingly favour banning hate speech. That's what we're seeing now in our civilization, big tech companies have an overwhelmingly feminine presence and energy and they don't care. They want safety and security; they don't want to take risks me, I'm open it taking risks. I can appreciate respect the position, but I think, risk taking as the appropriate response. The scientific data shows this. Of course, there are men who safety. Of course, there are women who want risks, but there's a tendency. I think that tendency is easily reflected by biology, evolutionary biology, biologist psychology, and I think we need to consider these factors as we watch what's going on. In no way do I think the sovereignty, the problems. I suppose it's just interesting to assess. That's about it.

There are some people who say things like repeal the nineteenth. I don't agree with that. I certainly There is an issue that, when you have low testosterone, males just block Billy siding with women because they think it look at em laid that creates an amber. No, we need a good balance of masculine in feminine energy, because we are one species of people that have men and women and we all play a role in the society given role to any one sex, race or religion. I think, is a bad idea. Hey I,

what I'm saying is real diversity of thought and opinion helps make us stronger. What we have right now is not that we have homogenization, we have racial engender homogenization, that's not a good thing. The left will deny it because I want to believe it, but their overt tribalism and adherence to authority is burning everything down I'll leave it there, hey just a fund Friday segment. I guess next. I've been coming up at four p m over at Youtube COM slashed him guest. Thanks, rang it up and I'll see you all them.