And Tucker Carlson is coming up next musical physical Tucker good evening and welcome to the Tucker Carlson tonight for more than two centuries: the? U DOT S Senate has required support of at least sixty senators before they passed major pieces of legislation, and that makes for a cumbersome system. It requires compromise and patients it has endured through the centuries, despite leadership of the body, and that standard of sixty votes often referred to as the often referred to as the filibuster rule and its a democracy. And so when people

note, you had better be certain that a large majority of your citizens support what you are doing as a principle behind the system of government. Whatever you do as a lawmaker, you better be thoughtful about it. Whatever you are doing is wise and wont, hurt her grandchildren in ways that you hadnt bothered to think through and thats. Why? For two hundred and fourteen years we required a super majority in the Senate, its not just an arcane piece of Senate procedure. I wonder if people with different attitudes took control of people in our system. What if these new people didnt care about? The wisdom, what if they didnt believe in democracy, what if they consider, debate and persuasion winning people over instead intended to rule by force? What, if all these people carried about with power,

it would be an obstacle in your path to total control. They never were directed about anything. In fact, they despise clear and precise English. Instead, they would rely on feline misdirection. They lie about everything they themselves were committing and if they wanted to turn the party into a one party state, they wouldnt say that out loud. Instead, anyone who oppose that goal of partisanship they wouldnt even smile as they said it watch. When the Democrats have the White House again, if Mitch Mcconnell tries to do what he did to President Obama and put small minded

partisanship ahead of solving a massive country. We should get rid of the filibuster small minded partisanship. They served the: U Dot S Senate for decades and supported the decades and supported the filibuster when he was there, we will cut them out of the conversation. They suggested that we be open to eliminating the filibuster. If republicans obstruct the agenda. Are you more receptive to taking a look behind that job number one is to get the job number one is to get the majority the second we take control. We

are getting rid of the filibuster. How do we justify and on what grounds? We justify that the same way we we justify that the same way we justified tearing down ancient justified, tearing down ancient statues, statues and they wrote a piece because- and they wrote a piece because apparently and theres a lot at

stake in this conversation, but the last check and balance gone. There will be no limit to the ways that the Democratic Party can remake the country in the first few months and the power we dont have to guess about their plans. They told us what they have plans to do and without thats criminals and behavior, and crushes independent media voices in this channel that past a lunatic prenew deal which does nothing for the environment and does an awful lot for the control of the lot for the control of the country. They will call that immigration.

They will call that immigration reform their core voters are demanding.