Good evening and welcome to Tucker Carlson tonight in early two thousand and nine more than twelve years ago, the Obama administration made a surprising unprecedented accusation against Westchester County New York. According to the Obama administration, Westchester was an instrument of white supremacy, not the good liberals who live in Westchester, dont accuse them of being bigots the problem with the buildings they lived in, although single family homes row upon leafy row mailboxes. Those were all examples of racism, literally structural racism and the only solution the Obama people announced was much greater density. More subsidized housing, complex, more high rise apartment building may be some

drug vagrants living on the sidewalk. Only if Westchester County became more like the Bronx to become nonracist. This is something of a surprise to the people who live in Westchester, most of whom are beautiful. Liberals they didnt realize I had a white supremacy problem between twenty million two thousand and ten. According to census, numbers had risen by more than fifty percent. So how could the county be racist? It didnt seem to make any sense in court. The Obama administration explain their reasoning. They singled out westchesters practice of standard zoning referred to county regulations that restrict at the height of certain buildings and limited the placement of sewers to protect the drinking water sounds reasonable, but according to the Obama administration, those were restricted practices, its a legal term. That means they were racist and because they were racist, the Obama administration withheld more than twenty dollars million in federal

funds from Westchester County. The county wanted the money it would have to construct ten thousand low income high density from a very nonracist departments. So this battle didnt get a lot of news coverage, but it went on for all eight years of the Obama administration and in the end, to its credit, Westchester fought back because they could afford good lawyers and they eventually won in court. But many places couldnt afford good lawyers, so they had to relent under pressure from federal ideologues communities and Oregon in Minneapolis, for example, with very little news coverage abolished single family zoning. This all happened in recent years. The question is: why is it happening the goal isnt to eliminate racism? The goal is to eliminate suburbs so, rather than improve the lives of people who live in places, the idea is to destroy the lives of people who live in nice places. Why would you want to do that?

Theres? A very clear political reason: suburbs are typically purple politically Republicans can win just as Democrats can, but if your goal is to make the country and one party state you want to change this, you want to make suburbs into cities, and if you did that youd win every time. Democrats win cities of the ten biggest cities from a Democrats, route, nine of them of the fifty bigots they control. Two thirds doesnt mean they are good at running cities they are not, but making the Citys better is hardly the point winning elections is the point. Democrats are happy to admit this heres congresswoman from yesterday. This is about human and physical infrastructure have been leading this fight care economy as infrastructure, climate justice is infrastructure, housing, injustices, infrastructure and public transit is infrastructure

infrastructure. So these bold investments must be made for workers and families in order for us to have a just, equitable and robust recovery from this pandemic. Housing justice seems like a term ayanna Pressley just made up was it mean of most people were asked, they would say means youre not allowed to prevent people, regardless of what they look like world, where they are from from moving into a specific, neighborhood and thats. True, you cant discriminate you shouldnt be able to, but thats, not what shes talking about shes talking about something very different saying. If neighborhoods look different, then by definition they are racist. One is nicer than the other coming of to make it less nice or else thats, not equity. The Obama administration was on this in two thousand and fifteen. The department of Housing and urban development under Obama issued a final rule

on what it called affirmatively furthering their housing. Julian Castro, the fair housing goal was simply to enforce the fair housing act, which makes it illegal to discriminate housing sales for venting on the basis of race. Again, that was on the book a long time and its not controversial, but that law also requires local jurisdiction is to receive money to take steps to affirmatively further the goal of eliminating race discrimination in housing. This is a complex wordplay but heres what it means under the Obama administration, one important step further. According to Julian Castro, the existence of concentrated poverty and urban centers, as opposed to rural centers, is de facto evidence of discrimination. As long as they there is, a place

is poorer than where you live. Where you live is racist. On the basis of that assumption, they move forward and local jurisdictions were told to eliminate single family zoning and increase density, and if they didnt comply, they might lose millions of dollars in community development block grants. That was a very radical step and most Americans were unaware, was even happening. Handed people who live outside the cities are very against it, including faithful Democrats. None of them were for that. They wanted to live next to section eight housing, they wouldve stayed in the first place, so people hate this idea. Suburbs are very complicated. Organisms like everything humans build they developed over a century in some cases more than a century for good reason. They have federal ideologues come in and destroyed them was very threatening to people. They are not for that again. Even democratic voters are not for that and Joe Biden understands it, not a genius, but

he knows the fierce and when asked about it during the last campaign, he lied watch bite and reassure you that its racist even to suggest that he would want to change America suburbs here. It is look what hes doing now, the president an awful lot of suburbanites or to site theyre going to vote. For me at least the polling data suggests, as opposed to him and talking about Biden, is going to send these folks out to suburbia and they will end up with houses in suburbia. A lot of suburban voters did vote for Joe Biden, partly on the basis of that claim that he wasnt going to send a lot of people to the suburbs. But I was a complete lie now Joe Biden is preparing to do just that at the time. His defense was that the rule by itself was not enough to restructure and eliminate suburbs for local communities. Didnt want to comply with the rules, they lose millions of dollars if they could survive.

What Biden didnt say is that the HUD rule was just the first step in his new infrastructure plan, which you can read online, and you should Biden calls for dramatically expanding the federal governments power over suburbs. The plan calls for implementing the revision of something called the home act first proposed by Cory, Booker of Newark, who was a lunatic and reckless that goes much farther than anything. The Obama administration even attempted it would cut billions of dollars to any local government ordinances that ban apartment buildings from certain residential areas or set of minimum block size for a single family home. So under this law, are no longer in charge of how large your lot sizes can be. You have no control over anything whats the point of having a local government at that point, but it goes farther. It doesnt simply cut off

funding to suburbs that dont comply with its equity rules. It prevent states from getting federal transportation rates of any kind if they refused to allow high res apartments or high density, zoning and their suburbs, and that is very different. Unlike the HUD Grant, that is money they have to have they cant refuse. It needs federal transportation dollars to fix their streets and highways, and it is their money anyway. It is every year by citizens of their state. The Biden administration is in no mood for negotiation with suburban homeowners with their decent schools and crime free streets living in the 1950s America. According to the principles of equity, those people must be bigots. By definition, they are living better than people in densely populated cities are living. Therefore, we must crush them. This is not a conspiracy theory

very soon it could be the law. The bill. Abolishing the suburbs is a major part of the Biden. Administration is infrastructure plan that legislation is still being negotiated tonight, but already the media are rushing to defend it. What shows they are? What liars here is USA. Today, for example, the largest newspaper bidens proposal would reward grants and tax benefits to cities that change zoning laws to bolster more equitable access to affordable housing, a house with a white picket fence and a big backyard for the fourth of July barbecue may be a staple of the american dream, but experts and local politicians say multifamily. Zoning is key to combating climate change, racial injustice and the nations growing housing crisis. Really, if you wanted to fix the affordable housing crisis, maybe you would prevent foreign

governments from buying up residential housing which they are doing, or black rock from buying up single family homes and turning them into rentals. Maybe you would make some effort to loosen the housing market a little bit but theyre not doing that theyre doing the opposite. You may ask yourself in the federal government, really ban you from having a suburban home in a backyard celebrating the fourth of July, with your kids, all in the name of climate change and racial equity, and they prevent suburbs from having roads if they dont know the low income housing projects under existing civil rights law. A plan like this only works if the feds can prove that your roads are somehow racist, and that is exactly the case they are making right out in the open open its, not just the Obama administration. Pete Buttigieg is now saying it watch this. The interstate system was built to keep certain groups in in certain groups. Out

often this wasnt just an act of the left. Often this was a conscious choice. Racism physically built into some of our highways eisenhowers interstate highway system, is racist. I 95 is tell us how PETE Buttigieg does he even believe that no one believes that just like leaving Westchester County is bigoted its not about racism, stop with that its about power and for multinational corporations like Blackrock driving down the cost of homes even further and building more apartment high rises in the suburbs that has been the goal of the most powerful people in the world for some time. In fact, just a few years ago, the World Economic Forum released a video explaining you will own nothing and you will be happy

whats, less clear is why more self described conservatives whose job is not only to conserve things, arent objecting to this its like they dont, even notice its happening. They are negotiating this bill. The future of the way Americans.