To monitor the rally raking with any news that emerges a good eating, welcome to Tucker Carlson tonight, Happy Columbus day. You may have missed the first round of Amy Coney Barretts Confirmation evening Emac hearing are they. It was bizarre bizarre. For this reason, none of the attacks on her and theres many of those had anything to do with the job that shes trying to get the Supreme Court exists only to determine whether the laws of the politicians right are consistent with the constitution of the United States thats. Why we have the Supreme Court and the only reason we have it Supreme Court justices do not make laws because theyre not elected by voters, we dont let them legislate as a result and thats how democracy works. People who are alike to get to make laws Democrats would like to change that system. They understand. Congress is inherently small. Conservative body and Congress is never going to change the country overnight

and radical ways, because voters do not want radical overnight change. They never do if youre going to have a revolution and remake America youre going to have to do it from above and imposing on people. The left would like to use the Supreme Court as their instrument to do that. It kind of Super Congress with lifetime tenure. Imagine the power like that. Imagine the power like that, nothing! You cannot do once you understand that perspective very much their perspective. Todays hearings made sense. Democrats spent hours talking about the two thousand and nine Obamacare law, and that goes back if youre interviewing someone for whom the Supreme Court theres only one relevant question about Obamacare. Is it constitutional thats all they consider thats all theyre supposed to consider, not how they feel about the law, not where it contorts with their personal values? Is it constitutional that was one of the few things Democrats did not ask because theyre not inserted whether or not its constitutional? What they care about is power

and Amy Coney Barrett will diminish or enhance theirs. They understand the Supreme Court purely in political terms, and not surprisingly, they conducted todays hearings like a campaign rally. Health care for millions of Americans at stake. Barked one single senator from California, pointed to another woman from Laura. She will be unable to afford the treatments necessary to survive if Amy Coney Barrett gets this job, it is curtain for Laura. It Democrats made that very same point as they had recently obs or many will die. You know, theyre going to you know, theyre going to push through a justice. Whos been critical of a upholding the critical care act. There asking the Supreme Court to strike down to strike down the affordable care act.

Your nominations about the republican goal of appealing the affordable care ACT, the Obamacare they seem to detest. They are deliberately trying to defy the will of the people in their attempt to rollback the rights and protection provided under the affordable care act sounds like Obamacare is going the way of ACB getting on the courts, but its not actually and thats. The amazing thing Obamacare is not at risk. There is no case pending anywhere in the country, for that would eliminate Obamacare. They have no idea how Amy Coney Barrett would rule in a case like that and again it hasnt, but most of all Democrats themselves publicly conceded that Obamacare is a disaster. Six of the ten Democrats currently sitting on the Judiciary Committee, the same committee that convened today to

consider Amy, Coney, Barretts, nomination, six of the ten cosponsored Medicare for all legislation that legislation would have completely abolished. Obamacare, along with all private health insurance. Kamala Harris is one of the people who voted for that. Yes, theres Kamala Harris today warning us. The country will collapse if Amy Coney Barrett goes to the hypothetical case to destroy Obamacare, which she herself voted to destroy what it all seems, kind of confusing. Think about it for a second, and it begins to make more sense. When you realize the goal is not to preserve Obamacare again, they voted to scrap Obamacare. The goal is to undermine the legitimacy of our systems, in this case the three Supreme Court, so Joe Biden and Kamala Harris can pack the court again. It is about power, oh thats, the key.

When confirmation hearings become partisan political exercises, they make the Supreme Court itself seem like a partisan political exercise and that degrades the public trusts in the cord and the support for the institution. It Democrats know that the public to go along with the court packing they have to delegitimize everything about the court and the confirmation process if thats what they did today against them. It is the legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Let me close by remembering her for a minutes in this unseemly charade. This is a charade when they say this is a normal judiciary committee hearing rushing a judge through a shared process. They are confident that the victory in the Supreme Court is now within their grasp. If the Senate confirms Judge Barrett to this hypocritical, illegitimate process, yes Judge, I think this

hearing is a sham old, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, because in a democracy and a democracy, you are required to obey the posthumous orders of a dead person who is never elected? Okay, when you dont it is a sham, its a charade, never mind the fact that the sentiment of course course, by definition, funneling every constitutional procedure for fulfilling a supreme court vacancy if Amy, Coney Barrett, is not the outcome. The Democrats want. Therefore, the system is in which illegitimate remember that they tell you that at every turn, if its not trump, who tries to attack the Supreme Court, he could have tried. He did not consider packing the Supreme Court. It Democrats are planning to and its a familiar path. Hugo Chavez packed the Supreme Courts of Venezuela in two thousand and four and the same in Turkey. How did they do that? How did they get their

populations to go along with a question mark by teaming the claiming the judicial systems were already illegitimate. Reveled Wiccans are ready, packed up the core, Joe Biden declared, and yes, he had nine justices for more than one hundred and fifty years, and somehow more than one hundred and fifty years and somehow without anybody noticing President Trump Pack, the Supreme Court he did. Court packing is going on right now, going on with Republicans packing the court now its not constitutional, what they are doing, they are the ones of violating the constitution, says Joe Biden. So when I rewrite the constitution, it will be fun. Thats, the predicate thats the set up for whats coming next Joe Biden knows Republicans are not packing the court. He also knows he can repeat the light with no consequences whatsoever, because the media will never hold him to account if they want him to get away with it.

Back in twenty thirteen, when I helped Barack Obama a partisan operation road to court, packing has involved one branch of government proposing to change the structure of the court, either expanding or decreasing. The number of justices Republicans are not doing that its pretty simple theyre, not in favor of doing that we will attack them for doing it. We are not partisan. Of course, you wont, find a Politifact fact checker of what Joe Biden said on Saturday and the media actually rush to perpetuate the whatever it takes. Whatever it takes this weekend, a piece by the Associated Press referred to court packing, not sarcastically d politicizing, the court. You increase the size of the court to dilute the other size power, you pack it full of partisans who do your bidding and that is

depoliticized politicizing. He would be open to measures to depoliticize the court, including adding judges to the bench or practice credits packing the court. No, not critics scholars, historians, politicians, it Ruth Bader, Ginsburg herself. Every person in America referred to court packing as court packin up until two weeks ago, right hard to believe that line made it into print, but it did corporation rocking is d politicizing the courts. You will see it in the neck style guide next to their entries on undocumented shoppers and peaceful riots. Funny that EP is onto something inadvertently and many judges and justices in the country are obviously thinking. They have too much power. More than individuals should have power in the country should roadside and the electorate. People elected should have the

power and not people who are appointed. Unlike the judges, they should not be deciding issues like abortion and immigration policy for the entire country, but they are. The solution is not to embrace more politics in your judicial branch. We recognize the proper role of the courts and de escalate a little bit to bring us closer to sanity. In a brief moment for the end of todays hearing and the opening statement, Amy Coney Barrett tried to do exactly that. Watch. The courts have a vital responsibility to the rule of law, which is critical to a free society, but courts are not designed to solve every problem or right every wrong in our public life. The policy decisions on the value judgments of government must be made by the political branches elected by an accountable to the people. The public should not expect courts to do so in courts should not try. These hearings of

Amy Coney Barrett will continue for the next couple days. Barring some really dramatic a developments, it seems likely she will be confirmed in the end theres, not a lot of drama tonight surrounding her nomination. What happens to the.