Going to do is reenact any of the postdebate analysis on the networks, because the thought of that is too horrible. The only analysis you need is from Mark Steyn, who was not on tv last night. We worth promise worth it whatd, you think. Like many people, I found it terrible, but im actually more concerned with the presidential debate. Commission is so horrified by it that they now want to change the rules to make it more like the traditional boringly, stultifying way respectable debate. If I dont believe in the debate commission, I dont see why, in the republic of three hundred million people, Jane Harman, Olympia, Snowe and a couple of other people, you vaguely remember from the day before yesterday should have a monopoly on presidential debates. If they do change the rules, I hope the President manages to smash through them the way he did through the over formatted format last night. They are not

interested in ratings and im, not quite sure what theyre interested in the journey has no port. Why do you think the Presidential Debate Commission? I know why I didnt like last nights debate, but why are they trying to set up a microphone killing mechanism or whatever theyre doing to tamp it down next time because they always want to over formatted it? Traditionally, these debates, usually they go, will have 92nd opening statements, after which the other party will have forty five seconds for rebuttal to the opening statement followed by a 32nd preremodeled to whatever the next question is in the whole thing is locked down in boredom. What more people tune in for is what happened last night, the two guys going at it directly. I look at it in showbiz terms. Whatever you come out and do an act, one youve got to do

something different and act to a trump is brilliant at pit the responses thats, what people remember youll, be in jail. Only Rosie Odonnell Trump should give it some of those 152nd answers and then said: Nobodys Boating on climate change, its 37th on peoples, list of priorities it wasnt on the list of original topics from debate, which has to be issued three weeks in advance for some reason, and he shouldve just said. Theres a pandemic theres a lock down. There is looting and burning on the streets of american cities. Nobody cares about climate change. I yield the balance of my time to Joe Biden and he can talk about federal subsidies for environmentally friendly window treatments, which actually happened under Obama and let Joe exhaust himself Joe cant, actually fill up the time, give him more time and let him

exhaust himself thats brilliant. Your first point is especially smart. Angry doesnt work, its not effective. I try every night when I write my open, I dont always follow my own advice. Funny works better, sometimes writers, anger works. I dont believe being told that youre a youve got to condemn white supremacy is a good faith question because it implies you somehow have been cozying up to it its like. When did you stop beating your wife? If you ask that you should say thats a fair question, you should also put it to the guy across the stage who boasted about working with segregationist Democrat senators, who said he would do well in South Carolina, because Delaware is a state. Youve got to have righteous anger, but youve got to use it sparingly. Very good advice.